AUTHOR=Tinguely Pascale , Frehner Lorenz , Lachenmayer Anja , Banz Vanessa , Weber Stefan , Candinas Daniel , Maurer Martin H. 

TITLE=Stereotactic Image-Guided Microwave Ablation for Malignant Liver Tumors—A Multivariable Accuracy and Efficacy Analysis

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Oncology

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2020

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.00842

DOI=10.3389/fonc.2020.00842

ISSN=2234-943X

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Background:</bold> Therapeutic success of thermal ablation for liver tumors depends on precise placement of ablation probes and complete tumor destruction with a safety margin. We investigated factors influencing targeting accuracy and treatment efficacy of percutaneous stereotactic image-guided microwave ablation (SMWA) for malignant liver neoplasms.</p><p><bold>Materials and methods</bold>: All consecutive patients treated with SMWA for malignant liver tumors over a 3-year period were analyzed. A computed tomography-based navigation system was used for ablation probe trajectory planning, stereotactic probe positioning, and validation of probe positions and ablation zones. Factors potentially influencing targeting accuracy [target positioning error (TPE)] and treatment efficacy within 6 months [ablation site recurrence (ASR)] were analyzed in a multivariable regression model, including challenging lesion locations (liver segments I, VII, and VIII; subphrenic location).</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> Three hundred one lesions (174 hepatocellular carcinomas, 87 colorectal liver metastases, 17 neuroendocrine tumors, and 23 others) were targeted in 191 interventions in 153 patients. The median TPE per ablation probe was 2.9 ± 2.3 mm (<italic>n</italic> = 384). Correction of ablation probe positions by repositioning was necessary in 4 out of 301 lesions (1%). Factors significantly influencing targeting accuracy were cirrhosis (<italic>R</italic> 0.67, CI 0.22–1.12) and targeting trajectory length (<italic>R</italic> 0.21, CI 0.12–0.29). Factors significantly influencing early ASR were lesion size &gt;30 mm (OR 5.22, CI 2.44–11.19) and TPE &gt;5 mm (OR 2.48, CI 1.06–5.78). Challenging lesion locations had no significant influence on targeting accuracy or early ASR.</p><p><bold>Conclusions:</bold> SMWA allows precise and effective treatment of malignant liver tumors even for lesions in challenging locations, with treatment efficacy depending on targeting accuracy in our model. Allowing for many tumors to be safely reached, SMWA has the potential to broaden treatment eligibility for patients with otherwise difficult to target tumors.</p>