Abstract
Objective:
Ovarian cancer (OV) is the most fatal and frequent type of gynecological malignancy worldwide. TIMELESS (TIM), as a circadian clock gene, has been found to be highly expressed and predictive of poor prognosis in various cancers. However, the function of TIM in OV is not known. This study was designed to investigate the biological functions and underlying mechanisms of TIM during OV progression.
Methods:
Cell viability assay, cell migration assay, immunohistochemistry staining, qPCR analyses, and tumor xenograft model were used to identify the functions of TIM in OV. Bioinformatics analyses, including GEPIA, cBioPortal, GeneMANIA, and TIMER, were used to analyze the gene expression, genetic alteration, and immune cell infiltration of TIM in OV.
Results:
TIM is highly expressed in OV patients. TIM knockdown inhibited OV cell proliferation, migration, and invasion both in vitro and in vivo. Genetic alteration of TIM was identified in patients with OV. TIM co-expression network indicates that TIM had a wide effect on the immune cell infiltration and activation in OV. Further analysis and experimental verification revealed that TIM was positively correlated with macrophages infiltration in OV.
Conclusions:
Our study unveiled a novel function of highly expressed TIM associated with immune cell especially macrophages infiltration in OV. TIM may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker and immunotherapy target for OV patients.
Introduction
Ovarian cancer (OV) is the second leading cause of gynecologic cancer-related death in women around the world (1). The poor OV outcome is largely driven by the high rate of intraperitoneal dissemination and extraperitoneal metastasis in newly diagnosed cases (2). Survival rates for OV have only modestly changed for decades, and the 5-year survival rate remains below 45% (3). Therefore, it is very urgent to characterize the mechanisms and to identify the associated biomarkers for earlier diagnosis and treatment of OV.
More and more epidemiological evidences have suggested that a disturbed circadian rhythm was positively correlated with the risk of health disorders, such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, and cancer (4, 5). Biorhythms are essential for maintaining the whole-body homeostasis, while the disruption of biorhythms can cause the dysregulation of homeostasis and accelerate the development of diseases (6–8). Circadian rhythm disruption can contribute to suppress melatonin, which is a neurohormone known for its role in hindering cancer initiation and progression (9–11). Recent studies have demonstrated that circadian disruption might play a role in the etiology of cancers, including colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer (12, 13). However, the mechanisms for the circadian rhythm in cancer are not well elucidated. One study has pointed out that circadian disruption led to circadian dysregulation of DNA repair genes and increased DNA damage and potentially elevated cancer risk (14).
TIMELESS (TIM), as a circadian clock gene, was originally identified in Drosophila melanogaster as an integral part of the circadian rhythm (15). TIM protein can interact with Cryptochrome (CRY) and Period (PER) proteins and has a negative effect on the circadian cycle (16, 17). In mammals, TIM is the best characterized gene in DNA replication and damage repair by controlling DNA replication and maintaining the stability of replication fork and genome (18, 19).
TIM has been reported to be highly expressed in various cancers and to be involved in the development and progression of cancer (20–22). TIM can regulate sphingolipid metabolism and promote tumor cell growth through Sp1/ACER2/S1P axis in breast cancer (23). TIM promotes the tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer by activating the β-catenin signal pathway and binding to Myosin-9, to induce its nuclear translocation (24). Accumulated studies have shown TIM has vital roles in modulating DNA damage, replication stress, and tumor growth (25). Enhanced levels of TIM and Claspin protect cancer cells from oncogene-induced replication stress in a checkpoint-independent manner, which is beneficial to tumor growth (26). However, the expression level and precise role of TIM and whether it can be treated as a novel biomarker for earlier diagnosis or treatment in OV are not defined yet.
In our study, we found that TIM expression was significantly increased in OV. Both in vitro and in vivo studies revealed that TIM promoted the OV cell growth. We have identified the genetic alteration of TIM in patients with OV. TIM co-expression network analysis revealed a wide effect of TIM on the immune cell infiltration and activation in OV. Furthermore, we showed the positive correlation between TIM expression level and the macrophages infiltration in OV. Thus, TIM might be a potential prognostic biomarker and immunotherapy target for OV patients.
Materials and Methods
Clinical Samples
Human ovarian cancer, ovarian cysts, and normal ovarian epithelium were obtained from either Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fengxian Hospital, Southern Medical University, or Department of Gynecology, Changzhou Maternal and Child Care Hospital. None of them received radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and other related antitumor therapies before surgery. All human materials were obtained with informed content, and protocols were approved by the ethical review committee of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research in Human Production (authorized by the Shanghai Municipal Government).
Cell Culture and Reagents
Human ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3, OVCAR3, ES-2, OV429, A2780, CAOV3, OVCAR8 were all preserved in Shanghai Cancer Institute, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. All cell lines were cultured in the indicated medium according to the ATCC protocols and supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotics (100 μg/ml streptomycin and 100 units/ml penicillin) at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. All cell lines were tested negative for Mycoplasma contamination and authenticated with short tandem repeat assays.
siRNA Transfection
Cells were plated at 60–70% confluence in 60 mm dishes. SKOV3 and OVCAR3 were transfected with si-TIM or with a non-targeted siRNA as a control. The siRNA oligonucleotides were synthesized from GenePharma (Shanghai, China), and the detailed sequences of the siRNA used in this study were shown as follows: si-TIM-1, 5’-GCUAGAGAUUGUCUCCCUUTT-3’;si-TIM-2, 5’-CCAAAUACAUCCUGGGCAATT-3’. Negative control was scrambled siRNA targeting no known gene sequence. The transfection steps were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols using Lipofectamine® RNAiMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 13778030).
Construction of Lentivirus Constructs
The recombinant lentivirus containing shRNA targeting TIM and vector controls were purchased from (GeneCopoeia). Cells were infected with 1 × 106 recombinant lentivirus-transducing units in the presence of 6 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma, H9268). Twenty-four hours after infection, cells were selected and maintained with 2 μg/ml puromycin (Gibco, A1113802, USA). The knockdown efficiency of TIM was detected by qRT-PCR.
RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Takara, a7603-1). PrimeScript RT-PCR kit (Takara, PR036A-1) was used to perform the RT according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time qPCR was performed using Bestar® SybrGreen qPCR master mix (DBI, DBI-2043) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. mRNA expression was normalized to endogenous GAPDH expression in the same sample. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with an Applied Biosystems PRISM 7500 Sequence Detection System by using the default thermal cycling conditions: one initial cycle at 95°C for 10 min and 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C plus 30 s at 60°C. Sequences of the primers were used to amplify genes as follows:
TIM-F: GTTTTGGCAATCTGCCTAAGGA,
TIM-R: GCAGCTCATACAAGGTTTCACT,
GAPDH-F: ACAACTTTGGTATCGTGGAAGG,
GAPDH-R: GCCATCACGCCACAGTTTC.
Cell Viability Assay
SKOV3 and CAOV3 cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 3,000 cells per well with 100 μl of complete culture medium and cultured for 2–5 days. Each group contained four repeats. Ten μl Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, WST-8, Dojindo, Japan) solution was added to each well after 24, 48, 72, and 96 h and then cultured for an additional 1 h. The cell viability was measured at 450 nm with a Power Wave XS microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, USA).
Cell Migration
For the cell migration assay, 2.5 × 104 cells were seeded into the upper chamber of the transwell plate (Millipore, USA). Cells were allowed to migrate for 24 h at 37°C. The migrated cells were then fixed and stained with 0.1% crystal violet, six randomly selected fields were photographed, and the cell numbers were counted.
Immunohistochemistry Staining
IHC staining was performed as described previously (27). Briefly, the formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded liver tissue slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated for histopathological evaluation. The sections were blocked in 10% BSA and then incubated with primary antibodies (TIM, Abcam ab72458; CD68, Servicebio, GB113150) overnight at 4°C and with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Then the sections were treated with DAB substrate liquid (Thermo, S21024-2) and counterstained by hematoxylin. All the sections were observed and photographed with a microscope (Carl Zeiss).
In Vivo Tumor Xenograft Model
Six-week-old female athymic nu/nu mice were randomly divided into two groups and injected subcutaneously in the lower back with a total of 2 × 106 sh-NC or sh-TIM SKOV3/OVCAR3 cells in 150 μl PBS. Four weeks later, mice were sacrificed, and the tumor was isolated and the tumor weight was measured. All animals received humane care according to the local or national requirements for the care and use of laboratory animals.
Data Mining Using TCGA, GTEx, TIMER, cBioportal
The gene expression data in OV were obtained using either GEPIA2 database (http://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn/#analysis) based on TCGA and GTEx cohort. The immunome of different immune cell types infiltrated into the tumors in OV was analyzed using Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) 2.0 database (http://timer.cistrome.org/) (28). The LinkedOmics database (http://www.linkedomics.org/login.php) was applied to analyze the differentially expressed genes related to TIM from the TCGA-OV cohort through the LinkFinder module in the database (29). Function module analysis of Gene Ontology biological process (GO_BP), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways by the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were performed in the LinkInterpreter module. The genetic alterations and the network module of TIM in OV were obtained from cBioPortal (www.cbioportal.org) (30). A protein-protein interaction network analysis was conducted to analyze the expression of TIM and the potential interactions through STRING (https://string-db.org/) (31). GeneMANIA (http://www.genemania.org) was also used to indicate the predicative values of TIM (32).
Statistical Analysis
Data were presented as the means ± standard error of mean (SEM). Statistical analyses were done using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). One-way ANOVA or two-tailed student’s T-test was used for comparison between groups. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
TIM Expression Is Significantly Increased in Ovarian Cancer
In order to identify which circadian clock-related gene plays vital roles during OV progression, we analyzed 16 circadian clock-related genes using TCGA database and found that TIM was the most significantly upregulated gene in OV (Supplementary Figure 1). Also, by using CCLE database, TIM mRNA was widely expressed in different tissues (Supplementary Figure 2A). To explore the distinct expression of TIM in different cancers, we first analyzed the level of TIM mRNA expression in pan-cancer via GTEx and TCGA and found increased TIM mRNA expression in the majority of cancers, indicating the important role of TIM during tumorigenesis and progression (Supplementary Figure 2B). TIM mRNA expression was significantly upregulated in ovarian cancer (OV) tissues compared to normal ovarian epithelial tissues (Figure 1A). Using CPTAC samples, increased TIM protein expression was also found in ovarian cancer tissues compared to normal tissues (Figure 1B). We also found the mRNA and protein expressions of TIM were related to the disease stages and tumor grades (Supplementary Figures 2C–D).
Figure 1
Furthermore, the gene expression data from four independent GEO databases (GDS3592, GSE18520, GSE12470, GSE26712) also showed that TIM mRNA expression was significantly increased in ovarian cancer samples (Figure 1C). We further verified the protein levels of TIM in 176 OV samples from several hospitals by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis, and the results showed that the protein levels of TIM were upregulated in different types of ovarian cancer compared to benign tumors (Figure 1D). Among 176 ovarian cancer patients, 75.6% ovarian cancer tissues showed high TIM protein level, while 24.4% showed low TIM protein level (Figure 1D).
TIM Knockdown Inhibited OV Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion Both In Vitro and In Vivo
To investigate the biological functions of TIM during OV progression, we first tested the mRNA of TIM in seven different OV cell lines including SKOV3, OVCAR3, ES-2, OV429, A2780, CAOV3, and OVCAR8 by qPCR. SKOV3 and OVCAR3 showed relatively high TIM expression, while CAVO3 and OVCAR8 showed relatively low TIM expression (Figure 2A). Therefore, we have chosen SKOV3 and OVCAR3, two cell lines, for subsequent functional experiments. To gain further insight into the oncogenic roles of TIM in OV, we knocked down the TIM expression by siRNA. We detected >80% decrease of TIM expression in mRNA levels by qRT-PCR (Figures 2B, C). CCK8 assay showed that cell proliferation of SKOV3 and OVCAR3 was significantly inhibited by TIM knockdown (Figure 2C). Also, cell migration was also inhibited by TIM knockdown (Figure 2D). Next, to explore the effect of TIM on the proliferation of OV cells in vivo, we stably knocked down TIM by short hairpin RNA (shRNA) in OV cells, which was verified in SKOV3 and OVCAR3 cell lines by qRT-PCR (Figure 2E). In the orthotopic xenograft mouse model, the tumor growth was obviously reduced in TIM knockdown group compared with control group, which was revealed by tumor weight (Figure 2F). IHC staining results showed that Ki67 staining was decreased in the tumors from TIM knockdown group compared to control group (Figure 2G). Taken together, those data suggested a promotive effect of TIM in OV growth both in vitro and in vivo.
Figure 2
Genetic Alteration, Expression, and Interaction Analyses of TIM in Patients With OV
The genetic alterations, correlations, and networks of TIM were analyzed using the cBioPortal online tool for OV. We found that two or more alterations were detected in TCGA-OV datasets (Figure 3A). TIM was altered in 51 samples (3%) of the total 1,680 OV patients (Figure 3B). Moreover, we conducted a protein-protein interaction analysis to explore the potential interactions with TIM with both STRING and GeneMANIA analysis (Figures 3C, D). The results showed the other circadian clock-related proteins, such as TIPIN, PER1, PER2, PER3, and CRY2, and DNA replication/repair-related proteins, such as CHEK1, RPA1, RPA2, and RPA3, were the potential interactive proteins with TIM. And those might be closely associated with TIM-related molecular functions.
Figure 3
The Co-Expression Network of TIM in OV
For gaining more deep knowledge about the biological functions of TIM in OV, the LinkFinder module in the LinkedOmics database was applied to check the co-expression pattern of TIM in TCGA-OV cohort. We found that 6,313 genes (red dots) positively correlated with TIM, and 4,464 genes (green dots) negatively correlated with TIM as shown in Figure 4A. The heatmaps showed that the top 50 genes positively and negatively associated with TIM, respectively (Figures 4B, C). GO biological analysis indicated that the co-expressed genes of TIM mainly participated in cell cycle, cellular defense response, interleukin-4 production, interferon-gamma production, macrophage activation, leukocyte migration, etc. (Figure 4D). Furthermore, KEGG pathways analysis indicated the co-expressed genes of TIM were mainly enriched in cell cycle, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs), antigen processing and presentation, hematopoietic cell lineage, etc. (Figure 4E). Taken together, the above results show that TIMELESS co-expression network had a wide effect on the immune cell infiltration and activation in OV.
Figure 4
TIM Expression Is Closely Correlated With Macrophages Infiltration in OV
We further explored whether TIM can affect the immune cell infiltration in OV. The correlations between TIM expression level and different immune cell infiltration levels were analyzed using TIMER2.0 online database. The results showed that TIM has significant positive association with B cells, neutrophils, and macrophages, while no significant correlations with CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and dendritic cells (Figure 5A). As macrophages have the best correlation with TIM expression level in OV (Supplementary Figure 3A), therefore we focused on the macrophages and checked the macrophage infiltration by using the OV tissue microarray. IHC analysis of 176 tumor tissues from OV patients revealed a positive association between TIM expression and the number of CD68+ macrophages in OV tissues (Figure 5B). In addition, chemokines, including CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CCL18, and CCL20, play a vital role in macrophage recruitment. We identified that those chemokines were significantly upregulated in OV compared to normal tissue (Supplementary Figure 3B). Thus, TIM might exhibit a regulatory role on macrophages infiltration in OV.
Figure 5
Discussion
Circadian rhythm disorders are positively correlated with the risk of cancer in many types of cancer (10, 33, 34). Recent studies have demonstrated that circadian clock genes are involved in tumorigenesis, metastasis, as well as in chemotherapeutic resistance (23, 24, 26, 35). Approximately 70% of OV are found to be involved in the metastases during initial diagnosis. Most patients die of malnutrition and intestinal obstruction secondary to the abdominal metastatic niche. TIM, a core gene related to circadian clock, is aberrantly upregulated in cancers, such as breast cancer and pancreatic cancer (36, 37).
TIM knockdown suppressed the self-renewal of cancer stem cells and the cancer cell invasion and migration abilities in breast cancer (38). Another study revealed that TIM regulated the sphingolipid metabolism through Sp1/ACER2/S1P axis, promoting the tumor cell growth of breast cancer (23). TIMELESS can inhibit the breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis by downregulating MMP9 expression (39). In colorectal cancer cells, TIM expression mediated by ERK suppressed G2/M arrest (20). Furthermore, TIM activation by H3K27 acetylation promoted the tumorigenesis of colorectal cancer by binding to Myosin-9 (24). Those provide us the evidences for the different ways of TIM in promoting tumorigenesis.
In this study, we identified a novel function of TIM in OV, which may provide a new basis for the treatment of OV. TIM is highly expressed in OV tissues compared with the corresponding normal tissues. Functional study showed that TIM knockdown inhibited the OV cell proliferation and migration. By using the cBioPortal online tool, the alterations were detected in OV. Also, we found the potential interacted proteins with TIM, which are the circadian clock-related proteins and DNA replication/repair-related proteins, suggesting TIM might play its role by interacting with those proteins. This requires further investigations. Co-expression network analysis suggested that TIM had a wide effect on the immune cell infiltration and activation in OV. Therefore, we focused on the infiltrated immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of OV for our following study.
TME plays a critical role in cancer cell proliferation, migration, and metastasis and could affect tumor progression and recurrence. TME is composed by cellular and non-cellular components, including fibroblasts, endothelial cells, different types of immune cells, together with cytokines, growth factors, and extracellular matrix (ECM) et al. (40–42). Immune cells in TME showed to harbor either tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressing activities. Our study found that TIM was positively associated with B cells, neutrophils, and macrophages, while no significant correlations with CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and dendritic cells, suggesting that TIM might also affect the immune status. Therefore, it is worth to further investigate the role of TIM in the field of tumor immunotherapy.
The most frequently found immune cells within the TME are tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), which are necessary to drive tumor progression, invasion, and metastasis (43–45). We found that macrophages have the best correlation with TIM expression in OV. By IHC staining of OV microarray, we verified the positive correlation between TIM expression and the macrophages infiltration in OV. However, how TIMELESS influences the macrophage infiltration during OV progression and the underlying mechanism are still under investigation. Previous studies have shown that TIM is involved in regulating the phagocytosis of bacteria in Drosophila (46). Whether the phagocytosis of macrophages is regulated by TIM needs to be further investigated, which will provide us more information for the macrophage function affected by TIM. In addition to the phagocytosis of macrophages, TIM might have impact on the macrophage migration and invasion, which also need to be further investigated.
In conclusion, we performed the comprehensive analysis of the expression and immune cell infiltration for TIM in ovarian cancer and revealed that TIM had an effect on the immune cell infiltration during OV, especially for macrophages. Thus, TIM might be used as a potential prognostic biomarker, and targeting TIM might constitute a new approach for the immunotherapy intervention of OV.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from Fengxian District Science and Technology Commission Project (No. 20181802 to XX), Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (No. 201940506 to XX), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81974407 to RZ).
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research in Human Production (authorized by the Shanghai Municipal Government). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The animal study was reviewed and approved by the East China Normal University Animal Care Commission. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.
Author contributions
RZ conceived the project, and XX, DL and ZW designed the experiments and interpreted data in the manuscript. XX, FG, LH and XC performed the experiments. XX and DL performed bioinformatics analyses and wrote the manuscript. DL, ZW and RZ edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.732058/full#supplementary-material
References
1
LheureuxSBraunsteinMOzaAM. Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Evolution of Management in the Era of Precision Medicine. CA Cancer J Clin (2019) 69(4):280–304. doi: 10.3322/caac.21559
2
TorreLATrabertBDe SantisCEMillerKDSamimiGRunowiczCDet al. Ovarian Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin (2018) 68(4):284–96. doi: 10.3322/caac.21456
3
WebbPMJordanSJ. Epidemiology of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol (2017) 41:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.08.006
4
JamesSMHonnKAGaddameedhiSVan DongenHPA. Shift Work: Disrupted Circadian Rhythms and Sleep-Implications for Health and Well-Being. Curr Sleep Med Rep (2017) 3(2):104–12. doi: 10.1007/s40675-017-0071-6
5
HausELSmolenskyMH. Shift Work and Cancer Risk: Potential Mechanistic Roles of Circadian Disruption, Light at Night, and Sleep Deprivation. Sleep Med Rev (2013) 17(4):273–84. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2012.08.003
6
GibsonEMWilliamsWP3rdKriegsfeldLJ. Aging in the Circadian System: Considerations for Health, Disease Prevention and Longevity. Exp Gerontol (2009) 44(1-2):51–6. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2008.05.007
7
YuEAWeaverDR. Disrupting the Circadian clOVk: Gene-Specific Effects on Aging, Cancer, and Other Phenotypes. Aging (Albany NY) (2011) 3(5):479–93. doi: 10.18632/aging.100323
8
ZhangSDaiMWangXJiangSHHuLPZhangXLet al. Signalling Entrains the Peripheral Circadian clOVk. Cell Signal (2020) 69:109433. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.109433
9
BondySCCampbellA. Mechanisms Underlying Tumor Suppressive Properties of Melatonin. Int J Mol Sci (2018) 19(8):2205. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082205
10
Group, I.M.V. Carcinogenicity of Night Shift Work. Lancet Oncol (2019) 20(8):1058–9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30455-3
11
WangFYeungKLChanWCKwokCCLeungSLWuCet al. A Meta-Analysis on Dose-Response Relationship Between Night Shift Work and the Risk of Breast Cancer. Ann Oncol (2013) 24(11):2724–32. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt283
12
PapantoniouKCastano-VinyalsGEspinosaATurnerMCMartin-SanchezVCasabonneDet al. Sleep Duration and Napping in Relation to Colorectal and Gastric Cancer in the MCC-Spain Study. Sci Rep (2021) 11(1):11822. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91275-3
13
Lozano-LorcaMOlmedo-RequenaRVega-GalindoMVVazquez-AlonsoFJimenez-PachecoASalcedo-BellidoIet al. Night Shift Work, Chronotype, Sleep Duration, and Prostate Cancer Risk: CAPLIFE Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2020) 17(17):6300. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176300
14
KoritalaBSCPorterKIArshadOAGajulaRPMitchellHDArmanTet al. Night Shift Schedule Causes Circadian Dysregulation of DNA Repair Genes and Elevated DNA Damage in Humans. J Pineal Res (2021) 70(3):e12726. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12726
15
GotterAL. A Timeless Debate: Resolving TIM’s Noncircadian Roles With Possible clOVk Function. Neuroreport (2006) 17(12):1229–33. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000233092.90160.92
16
JangARMoravcevicKSaezLYoungMWSehgalA. Drosophila TIM Binds Importin Alpha1, and Acts as an Adapter to Transport PER to the Nucleus. PloS Genet (2015) 11(2):e1004974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004974
17
BuszaAEmery-LeMRosbashMEmeryP. Roles of the Two Drosophila CRYPTOVHROME Structural Domains in Circadian Photoreception. Science (2004) 304(5676):1503–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1096973
18
Smith-RoeSLPatelSSSimpsonDAZhouYCRaoSIbrahimJGet al. Timeless Functions Independently of the Tim-Tipin Complex to Promote Sister Chromatid Cohesion in Normal Human Fibroblasts. Cell Cycle (2011) 10(10):1618–24. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.10.15613
19
McFarlaneRJMianSDalgaardJZ. The Many Facets of the Tim-Tipin Protein Families’ Roles in Chromosome Biology. Cell Cycle (2010) 9(4):700–5. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.4.10676
20
NeilsenBKFrodymaDEMcCallJLFisherKWLewisRE. ERK-Mediated TIMELESS Expression Suppresses G2/M Arrest in Colon Cancer Cells. PloS One (2019) 14(1):e0209224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209224
21
WangFChenQ. The Analysis of Deregulated Expression of the Timeless Genes in Gliomas. J Cancer Res Ther (2018) 14(Supplement):S708–12. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.187382
22
ZhouJZhangYZouXKuaiLWangLWangJet al. Aberrantly Expressed Timeless Regulates Cell Proliferation and Cisplatin Efficacy in Cervical Cancer. Hum Gene Ther (2020) 31(5-6):385–95. doi: 10.1089/hum.2019.080
23
ZhangSHuangPDaiHLiQHuLPengJet al. TIMELESS Regulates Sphingolipid Metabolism and Tumor Cell Growth Through Sp1/ACER2/S1P Axis in ER-Positive Breast Cancer. Cell Death Dis (2020) 11(10):892. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03106-4
24
CaoMWangYXiaoYZhengDZhiCXiaXet al. Activation of the Clock Gene TIMELESS by H3k27 Acetylation Promotes Colorectal Cancer Tumorigenesis by Binding to Myosin-9. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2021) 40(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-01936-4
25
YoungLMMarzioAPerez-DuranPReidDAMeredithDNRobertiDet al. TIMELESS Forms a Complex With PARP1 Distinct From ItsComplex With TIPIN and Plays a Role in the DNA Damage Response. Cell Rep (2015) 13(3):451–9. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.017
26
BiancoJNBergoglioVLinYLPillaireMJSchmitzALGilhodesJet al. Overexpression of Claspin and Timeless Protects Cancer Cells From Replication Stress in a Checkpoint-Independent Manner. Nat Commun (2019) 10(1):910. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08886-8
27
LiJYangXMWangYHFengMXLiuXJZhangYLet al. Monoamine Oxidase A Suppresses Hepatocvellular Carcinoma Metastasis by Inhibiting the Adrenergic System and Its Transactivation of EGFR Signaling. J Hepatol (2014) 60(6):1225–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.02.025
28
LiTFuJZengZCohenDLiJChenQet al. TIMER2.0 for Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells. Nucleic Acids Res (2020) 48(W1):W509–14. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa407
29
VasaikarSVStraubPWangJZhangB. LinkedOmics: Analyzing Multi-Omics Data Within and Across 32 Cancer Types. Nucleic Acids Res (2018) 46(D1):D956–63. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1090
30
GaoJAksoyBADogrusozUDresdnerGGrossBSumerSOet al. Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the Cbioportal. Sci Signal (2013) 6(269):pl1. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004088
31
SzklarczykDGableALLyonDJungeAWyderSHuerta-CepasJet al. STRING V11: Protein-Protein Assoviation Networks With Increased Coverage, Supporting Functional Discovery in Genome-Wide Experimental Datasets. Nucleic Acids Res (2019) 47(D1):D607–13. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1131
32
Warde-FarleyDDonaldsonSLComesOZuberiKBadrawiRChaoPet al. The GeneMANIA Prediction Server: Biological Network Integration for Gene Prioritization and Predicting Gene Function. Nucleic Acids Res (2010) 38(Web Server issue):W214–20. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq537
33
ShafiAAKnudsenKE. Cancer and the Circadian ClOVk. Cancer Res (2019) 79(15):3806–14. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0566
34
ZhangYPapantoniouK. Night Shift Work and Its Carcinogenicity. Lancet Oncol (2019) 20(10):e550. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30578-9
35
TangQMXieMRYuSLZhouXXieYLChenGJet al. Periodic Oxaliplatin Administration in Synergy With PER2-Mediated PCNA Transcription Repression Promotes Chronochemotherapeutic Efficacy of OSCC. Advanced Sci (2019) 6(21):1900667. doi: 10.1002/advs.201900667
36
FuALeadererDZhengTHoffmanAEStevensRGZhuY. Genetic and Epigenetic Assoviations of Circadian Gene TIMELESS and Breast Cancer Risk. Mol Carcinog (2012) 51(12):923–9. doi: 10.1002/mc.20862
37
RellesDSendeckiJChipitsynaGHyslopTYeoCJArafatHA. Circadian Gene Expression and Clinicopathologic Correlates in Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg (2013) 17(3):443–50. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2112-2
38
ChiLZouYQinLMaWHaoYTangYet al. TIMELESS Contributes to the Progression of Breast Cancer Through Activation of MYC. Breast Cancer Res (2017) 19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13058-017-0838-1
39
LiBMuLLiYXiaKYangYAmanSet al. TIMELESS Inhibits Breast Cancer Cell Invasion and Metastasis by Down-Regulating the Expression of MMP9. Cancer Cell Int (2021) 21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-01752-y
40
WangHChenL. Tumor Microenviroment and Hepatovellular Carcinoma Metastasis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (2013) 28 Suppl 1:43–8. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12091
41
HanahanDCoussensLM. Accessories to the Crime: Functions of Cells Recruited to the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Cell (2012) 21(3):309–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.022
42
PetitprezFVanoYABechtEGiraldoNAde ReynièsASautès-FridmanCet al. Transcriptomic Analysis of the Tumor Microenvironment to Guide Prognosis and Immunotherapies. Cancer Immunol Immunother (2018) 67(6):981–8. doi: 10.1007/s00262-017-2058-z
43
RiveraLBBergersG. LOVation, Lovation, Lovation: Macrophage Positioning Within Tumors Determines Pro- or Antitumor Activity. Cancer Cell (2013) 24(6):687–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.11.014
44
CondeelisJPollardJW. Macrophages: Obligate Partners for Tumor Cell Migration, Invasion, and Metastasis. Cell (2006) 124(2):263–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.007
45
QianBZPollardJW. Macrophage Diversity Enhances Tumor Progression and Metastasis. Cell (2010) 141(1):39–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.014
46
StoneEFFultonBOAyresJSPhamLNZiauddinJShirasu-HizaMM. The Circadian Clock Protein Timeless Regulates Phagovytosis of Bacteria in Drosophila. PloS Pathog (2012) 8(1):e1002445. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002445
Summary
Keywords
ovarian cancer, macrophages, chemokines, bioinformatic analysis, TIM
Citation
Xing X, Gu F, Hua L, Cui X, Li D, Wu Z and Zhang R (2021) TIMELESS Promotes Tumor Progression by Enhancing Macrophages Recruitment in Ovarian Cancer. Front. Oncol. 11:732058. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.732058
Received
28 June 2021
Accepted
29 July 2021
Published
19 August 2021
Volume
11 - 2021
Edited by
Xu Wang, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, China
Reviewed by
Zhijun Liu, Duke University, United States; Lei Shi, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Weiting Qin, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Xing, Gu, Hua, Cui, Li, Wu and Zhang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Rong Zhang, rongzhang1965@163.com; Zhiyong Wu, wuzhiyong@fudan.edu.cn; Dongxue Li, ldxx18@163.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Molecular and Cellular Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.