REVIEW article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Cancer Cell Signaling
Disrupting the CCND1–CDK4 Protein-Protein Interaction: Emerging Strategies to Target Cyclin D–Dependent Kinase Assembly in Cancer
- EK
Emadeldin Kamel 1
- SM
Sally Mostafa Khadrawy 2
- MA
Mohamed A. M. Ali 2
- NA
Noha A. Ahmed 1
- MR
Mostafa R. Abukhadra 3
- SA
Saleh Alkhedhairi 4
- FF
Faris F. Aba Alkhayl 4
- AM
Al Mokhtar Lamsabhi 5
1. Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt
2. Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3. United Arab Emirates University College of Science, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
4. Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
5. Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Cyclin D1 (CCND1)–CDK4 complex formation is a gatekeeping event for G1 progression and a central vulnerability in many cancers, as underscored by the clinical impact of ATP-competitive CDK4/6 inhibitors. Yet catalytic-site inhibition does not fully address the biology of CDK4, which operates across multiple assembly and regulatory states and can be modulated by partner proteins and cellular context. These features motivate an alternative strategy: direct disruption of the CCND1–CDK4 protein–protein interaction (PPI) to prevent (or destabilize) productive complex formation. In this review, we synthesize the structural and mechanistic basis of CCND1–CDK4 assembly, highlight how endogenous regulators—particularly INK4 family inhibitors—provide biological proof-of-principle for antagonizing cyclin–CDK interfaces, and evaluate engineered approaches aimed at interface blockade. We compare peptide-and peptidomimetic modalities (including constrained/stapled peptides), intracellular biologics such as intrabodies, and emerging structure-guided and computational discovery efforts, emphasizing what constitutes convincing evidence of true PPI disruption versus indirect loss of kinase signaling. Finally, we discuss translational considerations—delivery, selectivity, pharmacodynamic biomarkers, and resistance—and propose a practical validation framework to accelerate the development of bona fide CCND1–CDK4 PPI disruptors.
Summary
Keywords
Cancer, CCND1-CDK4 Inhibition, CDK interface, INK4 family, protein-proein interactions
Received
07 March 2026
Accepted
15 June 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Kamel, Khadrawy, Ali, Ahmed, Abukhadra, Alkhedhairi, Aba Alkhayl and Lamsabhi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Emadeldin Kamel
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.