AUTHOR=Dong Vincent , Sevgi Duriye Damla , Kar Sudeshna Sil , Srivastava Sunil K. , Ehlers Justis P. , Madabhushi Anant TITLE=Evaluating the utility of deep learning for predicting therapeutic response in diabetic eye disease JOURNAL=Frontiers in Ophthalmology VOLUME=2 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ophthalmology/articles/10.3389/fopht.2022.852107 DOI=10.3389/fopht.2022.852107 ISSN=2674-0826 ABSTRACT=Purpose

Deep learning (DL) is a technique explored within ophthalmology that requires large datasets to distinguish feature representations with high diagnostic performance. There is a need for developing DL approaches to predict therapeutic response, but completed clinical trial datasets are limited in size. Predicting treatment response is more complex than disease diagnosis, where hallmarks of treatment response are subtle. This study seeks to understand the utility of DL for clinical problems in ophthalmology such as predicting treatment response and where large sample sizes for model training are not available.

Materials and Methods

Four DL architectures were trained using cross-validated transfer learning to classify ultra-widefield angiograms (UWFA) and fluid-compartmentalized optical coherence tomography (OCT) images from a completed clinical trial (PERMEATE) dataset (n=29) as tolerating or requiring extended interval Anti-VEGF dosing. UWFA images (n=217) from the Anti-VEGF study were divided into five increasingly larger subsets to evaluate the influence of dataset size on performance. Class activation maps (CAMs) were generated to identify regions of model attention.

Results

The best performing DL model had a mean AUC of 0.507 ± 0.042 on UWFA images, and highest observed AUC of 0.503 for fluid-compartmentalized OCT images. DL had a best performing AUC of 0.634 when dataset size was incrementally increased. Resulting CAMs show inconsistent regions of interest.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the limitations of DL for predicting therapeutic response when large datasets were not available for model training. Our findings suggest the need for hand-crafted approaches for complex and data scarce prediction problems in ophthalmology.