Subtrochanteric femur fractures are uncommon in children, accounting for only 4%–10% of all pediatric femoral fractures (1, 2). Despite their low frequency, these fractures require emergency care and have a high hospitalization rate. According to Pombo and Shilt's definition, subtrochanteric fractures are those occurring within 10% of the total femur length below the lesser trochanter (3). These fractures are unstable due to the strong muscular forces on the proximal fragment, causing flexion, abduction, and external rotation. Treatment options depend on the patient's age, weight, fracture pattern, associated injuries, and the surgeon's experience (4, 5). While spica casting remains a common treatment for patients under 5 years old, older children (aged 5–16 years) typically require surgery (6).

Various methods are available for managing femoral fractures in children, such as titanium elastic nails (TENs), locking plates, or external fixators (6). The optimal treatment for subtrochanteric femur fractures in school going children is still controversial. TENs are a well-established surgical option for children under 11 years of age, whereas rigid locking intramedullary nails are recommended for adolescent patients (7). With advancements in surgical techniques, TENs have been extended to include length-stable (transverse or short oblique) fractures in the proximal 1/3 of the femoral diaphysis and subtrochanteric fractures (8). However, in cases of spiral or comminuted subtrochanteric fractures, or fractures in heavy children (over 45 kg), TENs have a high failure rate. In such situations, locking plates are a viable alternative. Pediatric proximal femur locking plates may not always be readily available in developing countries, and standard locking plates used for subtrochanteric femur fractures may not provide sufficient fixation points in the short proximal femur segment, potentially compromising stability.

In this article, we introduce another internal fixation instrument for subtrochanteric fractures, namely the Ortho-Bridge System (OBS). The OBS was developed and designed in China with independent intellectual property rights held by Walkman Biomaterial Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China (patent number: ZL200510010654.3). It primarily comprises rods, clamps, and screws (Figure 1, Supplementary file S1), which can be freely combined by the surgeon to form individual internal fixation complexes. Unlike the single position and direction of screws in standard plate fixation, OBS screws offer adjustable positions and directions to match specific situations, enhancing versatility and ease of use (Figure 2). Angular screw options provide better resistance to pull-out and improved stability. This three-dimensional adjustability of OBS screws stands as the primary advantage of this system over traditional plate fixation, making it a preferred choice for treating pediatric subtrochanteric fractures. Biomechanical and clinical analyses have demonstrated favorable results with OBS for pelvis and long bone metaphyseal fractures, particularly in aged patients with osteoporosis (9). To the best of our knowledge, there have been limited reports on the use of OBS in the treatment of pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures. Therefore, this retrospective study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of OBS in managing length-unstable subtrochanteric femur fractures in school going children.

As shown in Table 1, there were 12 boys and 7 girls with an average age at the time of surgery of 10.4 years (range: 6.2–15.1). The causes of the injuries were as follows: vehicle accidents in 10 patients (52.6%), falls over 3 meters in height in 3 patients (15.8%), and sport-related injuries in 6 patients (31.6%). The average weight of the patients was 41.5 kg (range: 21–78). The affected side was the right femur in 6 cases (31.6%) and the left in 13 cases (68.4%). Two patients sustained pathologic fractures involving aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC). One patient sustained an ipsilateral tibia fracture, and another had an ipsilateral radius fracture. All fractures were closed fractures without any neurovascular injuries. The study included 14 (73.7%) complex fractures and 5 (26.3%) spiral fractures. The average time from injury to surgery was 4.5 days (range: 3–8).

The average operation time was 111 min (range: 90–180) and the average surgical blood loss was 134 ml (range: 70–300). The average hospitalization time was 11.5 days (range: 7–14). The mean follow-up period was 14.5 months (range: 12–18). Radiographic follow-up revealed that the mean time to achieve union was 12.7 weeks (range: 8–16). Throughout the follow-up period, there were no patients with superficial or deep infection, implant failure, malalignment, or refracture. Additionally, no cases of osteonecrosis of the femoral head or heterotopic bone formation were observed. At the latest follow-up, one case exhibited limb lengthening of 10 mm on the operative side, attributable to excessive traction during fracture fixation. All patients had their implants removed after fracture union, with no complications reported. All patients achieved excellent results based on the Harris scoring criteria at the latest follow-up.

Pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures can be challenging to treat due to the instability and displacement of the short metaphyseal fragments, as well as limited remodeling potential of the proximal femur. So far, there are several methods of managing subtrochanteric femur fractures, including simple spica casting for younger children and surgeries with internal or external fixation for older children. Spica casting following traction requires a prolonged hospital stay and demonstrates the limited capability of restoring the limb length and alignment (6). The most suitable fixation device for treating pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures has not been determined. In our current study, we have demonstrated that using OBS for fixing these fractures can lead to good functional outcomes.

As shown in Table 2, there are several fixation device options for subtrochanteric femur fractures, including TENs, standard locking plates, and external fixators (12–15). TENs has been widely applied in treating patients with length stable fractures and those weighing less than 49Kg. However, high failure rate were reported when it used in managing length unstable, proximal or distal femur fractures, and in heavy children. Sink et al. reported a 22% complication rate in fractures of the proximal 1/3 of the femur treated with TENs (18). To enhance the strength of elastic nails, many scholars have made improvements in the placement technique and the number of nails used. It has been noted that pushing the nail into the greater trochanter apophysis or the posterior femoral neck cortex has improved the mail's support strength (8). Satisfactory results have been achieved in the treatment of length stable fractures, such as transverse or short oblique subtrochanteric fractures. Regarding long oblique subtrochanteric fractures, a comparative study by Tang et al. found similar outcomes between TENs and plate fixation (16). However, their study did not include complex fractures, and the age range of the patients was between 7 and 10 years. In some young children, the narrow medulla of the femur cannot accommodate three TENs, and this method does not improve stability. In our study, out of the 19 cases, 14 had complex fractures, making it challenging to achieve local three-point support. The short proximal segment tends to flex and rotate due to the pull of attached muscles. Complications after TENs fixation are related to the severity of comminuted fractures, and the probability of complications is significantly higher in the group with unstable fractures.

There are 5 children in the article, weighing over 50 kg. Multiple studies have indicated that children weighing more than 49 kg are five times more likely to experience complications after undergoing elastic nail surgery compared to other children (10). Compared to TENs, rigid locking intramedullary nails have the advantages such as strong stiffness, anti torsion force, and biomechanical stability. However, rigid nailing requires an entry point located laterally to the tip of the trochanteric physis to prevent harm to blood vessels near the proximal femur. It is suitable only for older patients who have a sufficiently large medullary canal for nail placement. There is a potential risk of growth arrest in the greater trochanter apophysis, resulting in coxa valga and heterotopic bone formation when the trochanteric physis is violated (19). Very proximal and distal femoral fractures remain challenging to treat with rigid nails. In case of polytrauma or open injuries, external fixation is considered an alternative (14). However, it has limited applicability in closed fractures due to an increased risk of pin tract infection, refracture, and loss of reduction. Additionally, in subtrochanteric femur fractures, there may not be enough space for pin placement in the proximal femoral segment.

For decades, plate fixation has been used for length unstable femur fractures, and has delivered anatomical reduction and adorable clinical outcomes (20). Patrikov et al. have used reconstruction or bridging steel plates to effectively treat comminuted proximal femoral fractures in children (21). However, the use of standard locking plates for these pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures, as shown in Figures 3, 4, may offer only minimal points of fixation due to the short proximal segment, which might not provide a robust construct. Danişman et al. have achieved good results in treating pediatric subtrochanteric fractures by using adult proximal humerus locking plates (17). This can be a viable alternative, especially in regions where pediatric proximal femur locking plates are not available.

In our institution, we have adopted the OBS for treating length-unstable subtrochanteric fractures, and this approach has yielded satisfactory clinical outcomes. The OBS is a novel type of fracture fixation device, which combines the structural principles of locking plates, external fixators, and spine screw-rod systems. The system comprises connecting rods, fixing clamps, and screws. During the operation, the choice and assembly of fixed and anatomical clamps, as well as connecting rods, can be customized according to the patient’s age, weight, and fracture type to achieve personalized fixation. Indirect reduction procedures and less invasive operative techniques are preferred because they cause minimal damage to the blood supply to the fragments, contributing positively to the healing process. The anatomical module of the proximal humerus or femur allows the placement of multiple locking screws into the patient’s femoral neck at different angles, resulting in increased angular stability. For younger children, when the size of anatomical clamps is too large, as shown in Figure 2, the proximal end of the connected rods can be pre-bent, and a nail can be inserted into the femoral neck through a single-hole clamp, or slide clamps can be attached to the rod, allowing screws to be placed in various directions to achieve three-dimensional fixation within limited space.

Biomechanical analysis indicates that the OBS can withstand a higher axial load and distribute the load to the femur, making it better suited for early functional exercise and fracture healing (22). The combination of connecting rods and clamps can better disperse stress to avoid stress concentration and reduce the risk of metal fracture. When bearing weight, the connecting rods can slide slightly in the axial direction to form dynamic compression which stimulates callus formation, prevents stress shielding, and reduces the risk of osteoporosis. In our study, all fractures healed well, with an average time to union of 12 weeks, including pathological fractures. We achieved favorable outcomes using the OBS for treating length-unstable subtrochanteric femur fractures in children aged 5–16 years. Although one child had a slight leg length discrepancy, it did not affect limb function. However, the OBS has certain disadvantages when compared to intramedullary devices. These include traditional plate-related issues like blood loss due to open reduction, extensive soft tissue dissection, and longer incision scars.

Our study has several limitations. First, this retrospective study involved a small number of cases, giving the low incidence of pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures. Second, there was no control group with different implants. Third, the OBS is relatively costly compared to TENs or classic compression plates, which is a significant drawback to consider in fracture management. To further assess the technique's effectiveness, well-designed, multicenter and prospective trials comparing it with pediatric proximal femur locking plating or intramedullary nailing are needed. We will try to gather more data and enhance the study's evidence level in the future work.

This study reports the promising outcomes of using OBS for fixing subtrochanteric femur fractures with length-unstable patterns in children of 5–16 years old. The OBS offers customization based on the patient's age, weight, and fracture type, allowing for individualized treatment. The use of screws in various directions enhances fixation strength. In summary, this system offers personalization, flexibility, convenience, and stability, making it a viable alternative for treating pediatric subtrochanteric femur fractures.