ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol., 07 October 2026

Sec. Experimental Pharmacology and Drug Discovery

Volume 17 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2026.1931755

Anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibodies attenuate airway inflammation and epithelial barrier dysfunction in asthma

  • Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Objective:

Nectin4 is an epithelial cell-adhesion molecule that may be involved in airway inflammatory responses. However, the effects of Nectin4 targeting in asthma has not yet been investigated.

Methods:

Here we engineered anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibody, N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab, their effects on airway epithelial dysfunction and inflammation. Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus 1 (Der p 1)–stimulated normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells and ovalbumin-induced asthmatic BALB/c mice were used as experimental models.

Results:

Anti-Nectin4 antibody treatment restored epithelial barrier dysfunction and was associated with changes in IL-33-related, MyD88/IRAK, and Afadin/Rac1 signaling in NHBE cells. In the murine asthma model, administration of N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab reduced airway inflammation, airway resistance, and immune cell infiltration in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Histological analysis demonstrated decreased inflammatory cell infiltration, goblet cell hyperplasia, and fibrosis in lung tissues. Anti-Nectin4 antibody treatment was also associated with modulation of IL-33/MyD88-related signaling components.

Conclusion:

These findings indicate that anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibodies attenuate airway inflammation and improve epithelial barrier function. Further preclinical studies are warranted to determine the potential of Nectin4 targeting in asthma.

Introduction

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory respiratory disease that causes repeated bronchoconstriction and airflow limitation, affecting 262 million children and adults worldwide in 2019 with high mortality in low and lower-middle-income countries (). It is characterized by cardinal symptoms of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), cough, chest tightness, and breathing difficulties (), manifesting with varying severity and impact on quality of life ().

Asthma treatment primarily focuses on controlling symptoms and preventing flare-ups by reducing inflammation and managing airway constriction. The main treatments currently used for asthma are corticosteroids and controller medications, such as inhaled long-acting bronchodilators (LABA) (). However, Long-term and high-dose use of corticosteroids can lead to various side effects, such as pneumonia, opportunistic infections, diabetes and lipid disorders (; ). Therefore, there is a need to develop safer and more potent alternative drugs that can effectively manage asthma symptoms over long periods, even at high doses. In recent years, there has been a shift from steroid treatment to an increased uptake of biologics with six Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved (). While available biologics effectively reduce asthma symptoms and exacerbation rates to varying extents (), often target specific phenotypes for higher response rates, and in some cases, requiring patient testing to confirm eligibility for certain subpopulations (; ).

Nectin4 is a transmembrane cell adhesion molecule from the Nectins family that regulates cellular activities by promoting the formation of intercellular junctions (Takai et al., 2008a). Nectin4 has been identified as a marker for cancer relapse and metastasis and is associated with poor prognosis across various carcinomas (Takano et al., 2009; ; ; ). Furthermore, our previous research demonstrated that Nectin4 is highly expressed in the lung tissue of asthmatic mice and that elevated levels of this protein are also present in the blood of asthma patients (). We found that, compared to wild-type asthmatic mice, the knockdown of Nectin4 significantly alters airway responsiveness and inflammation and affects the expression of Afadin as well as the activated forms of Src and Rac1 (). Nectin4 contributes to cell growth, angiogenesis, proliferation, and apoptosis through the involvement of the Rac1 and PI3K/Akt pathways (Siddharth et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2016).

IL-33 is an epithelial-derived alarmin cytokine that plays an important role in initiating and amplifying airway inflammation. It is mainly released from epithelial barrier tissues such as the bronchus, nasopharynx, and skin in response to cellular stress or injury (; ; ). IL-33 binds to its receptor ST2 together with the co-receptor IL-1 receptor accessory protein (IL-1RAcP), forming a signaling complex that activates downstream MyD88-dependent pathways (; ; ). Activation of this pathway promotes inflammatory responses by inducing cytokine production and immune cell activation, thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of allergic airway inflammation (; ; ; Schneider et al., 2009; Schmitz et al., 2005).

Given that airway epithelial cells are major sources of IL-33 and that Nectin4 is involved in epithelial junctional signaling, we hypothesized that Nectin4 modulation may be associated with IL-33-related inflammatory responses, either directly or indirectly through changes in epithelial barrier function. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of Nectin4-targeting antibodies on epithelial barrier function, IL-33-related signaling, and airway inflammation.

To date, only one nectin4-specific drug-Enfortumab Vedotin-has been approved on urothelial carcinoma () and the clinical trials that test novel therapeutics are only five. Moreover, the potential role of Nectin4 as a therapeutic target in asthma has not been investigated. In this study, we evaluated the preclinical effects of anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibodies on airway epithelial dysfunction and inflammation using bronchial epithelial cells in vitro and an experimental asthma model in vivo.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and reagents

The antibodies used were mouse anti-MyD88, IRAK1, IRAK4, TRAF6, Nectin4 antibodies (purchased from Novus), and antibodies against Erk1/2, p-Erk1/2, p38, p-p38, JNK, p-JNK, NF-κB, and p-NF-κB (from Cell Signaling Technology), and Afadin (from Invitrogen), Rac1 (from BD biosciences), Rac1-GTP (from Neweast biosciences). Mouse interleukin (IL)-4, 5, mouse tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, Interferon gamma (IFN-γ), IL-33, ST2, IL-1Racp enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were purchased from R&D Systems and NeoBiolab. Recombinant human and mouse Nectin4 proteins were purchased from R&D Systems. All assays were conducted according to the manufacturers’ protocols, unless indicated otherwise.

Development of phage display-derived Nectin4-specific antibodies, N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab

The scFv clones were isolated from a human phage library (Hu#1, YntoAb) by biopanning using purified recombinant human Nectin4 (rhNectin4; 2659-N4, R&D Systems). The recombinant human Nectin4 antigen was immobilized on immunotubes and coated in sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4 °C. After coating, the tubes were blocked with 3% skim milk in PBST (PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20) for 1 h at room temperature. Phage particles (∼1015 CFU) were incubated with the immobilized antigen. After incubation, unbound phages were removed by washing five times with PBST, and bound phages were eluted using 100 mM triethylamine and immediately neutralized with 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.4). The eluted phages were used to infect Escherichia coli at 37 °C for 1 h, and infected bacteria were plated on LB agar plates containing ampicillin and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The following day, bacterial colonies were inoculated into SB medium containing ampicillin and cultured to an optical density (OD600) of approximately 0.6. Helper phage (VCSM13) was added for phage amplification. Phages were harvested from culture supernatants and purified by polyethylene glycol (PEG8000)/NaCl precipitation, resuspended in PBS, and used for subsequent rounds of biopanning. A total of three rounds of panning were performed to enrich antigen-specific phage clones.

Individual bacterial colonies were isolated, and monoclonal binders were screened by ELISA against recombinant human Nectin4. scFv proteins were expressed in the periplasm of E. coli following IPTG induction, and periplasmic extracts were used for ELISA screening. ELISA signals were measured using antigen-coated plates (rhNectin4) and non-coated wells (background), and the differential optical density (ΔOD) between the two conditions was used for clone selection. Clones meeting the predefined criteria (target OD > 1.0 and background OD < 0.2) were considered positive binders. Selected antigen-specific clones were further analyzed by Sanger sequencing. Sequence analysis revealed redundant sequences, and representative clones were selected based on sequence quality and diversity. Ultimately, two clones (N-1T1C8 and N-1T3H9) were selected for further characterization.

Nectin4-specific scFv binders were inserted into scFv-Fc vectors and transiently expressed in Expi293F cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). The scFv-Fc antibodies were secreted into the culture supernatant, and monoclonal scFv-Fc antibodies were purified by protein A affinity chromatography, followed by dialysis against PBS (pH 7.4). The purity of N-1T1C8Ab and N-1T3H9Ab was greater than 95% as determined by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining. The typical antibody yield ranged from 1.5 to 3.0 mg per 100 mL of culture. After dialysis with PBS, the antibody concentration was measured using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, United States).

Determination of binding activity of antibodies

Human (2659-N4; R&D system) and mouse (3116-N4; R&D system) Nectin4 antigen were coated into ELISA plates (1 μg/mL, 50 μL/well) in sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) at 2 °C–8 °C overnight using 96-well plates (Corning). After coating, plates were blocked with 3% skim milk in PBST (PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20) for 1 h at room temperature. N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab were diluted from 0 μg/mL to 2000 μg/mL and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. Plates were washed three to five times with PBST between each step. Goat anti-human IgG HRP was diluted to 1:20,000, added to the microplate, and incubated for 1 h. The TMB working solution was added to the microplate plate and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Hydrochloric acid (1 M) was used to stop the reaction. A microplate reader (Thermo, VARIOSKAN LUX) was used to read the absorption value at 450 nm. The four-parameter curve was fitted using SoftMax software, and the sample’s half maximal effective concentration (EC50) value was calculated.

Cell culture

Normal human bronchial primary epithelial cells (NHBE) were cultured in bronchial epithelial cell growth medium supplemented with the BEGM BulletKit™ (Bronchial Epithelial Cell Growth Medium) (Lonza) at 37 °C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Before treatment, cells were incubated and converged to 70%–80% in the cell culture flasks. Cells were treated as follows: Der p 1: Pretreated with 10 μg/mL for 8 h before adding N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab. N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab: 1, 10, 100 μg/mL for 48 h. Cell proliferation was determined using the MTT cell viability assay kit (Roche). NHBE cells were seeded onto 96-well plates, and after treatment, 10 μL MTT was added to each well and incubated for 4 h. 100 μL Solubilization solution was added to each well for overnight. Cell viability was determined by measuring the absorbance of each well at 550 nm using a microplate absorbance reader. Trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) was measured using an Epithelial Volt/Ohm Meter (EVOM) (EVOM2, World Precision Instruments, FL). Baseline TEER was measured before any treatment and defined as 0 h. TEER was subsequently measured at 4, 8, 24, and 48 h after antibody administration. TEER was calculated by subtracting the resistance of a blank insert from the measured resistance and multiplying the resulting value by the surface area of the insert (1.12 cm2). TEER values were expressed as Ω·cm2.

Animals

Specific-pathogen-free BALB/c (DBL, Eumseong-gun, Korea) mice were maintained under pathogen-free conditions at 20 °C ± 2 °C, 50%–70% humidity, and 12 h light/dark cycle. Mice were randomly assigned to four groups of 6–8 mice per group: control; ovalbumin (OVA); OVA + N-1T1C8Ab; OVA + N-1T3H9Ab groups. The mice were stimulated with intraperitoneal injection of 50 μg of OVA emulsified in 10 mg of aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)3) in 0.1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) on days 0 and 14, and were then exposed to 5% OVA aerosol every day from day 21–23. N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab were respectively administered by intratracheal injection on days 18–23, with PBS used as a vehicle control. Twenty-four hours after the last intranasal challenge, airway resistance was evaluated, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and blood were collected, and lung tissue was harvested for protein extraction and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson’s trichrome staining. All animal procedures followed a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital (SCHBC-animal-2020-11).

Measuring mouse lung mechanics

Lung mechanics in the mice were determined using the flexiVent apparatus (SCIREQ, Montreal, QC, Canada). The mice were anesthetized with 2.5 mg/kg tiletamine and xylazine (Zoletil™; Bayer Korea, Seoul, Korea). After sedation, a tracheostomy was performed, and an 18-gauge cannula was inserted and connected to a computer-controlled ventilator. The mice were ventilated with room air with a tidal volume of 0.2 mL at a rate of 150 breaths/min. After 2 min of ventilation, the quasi-static compliance was measured as reported previously ().

Western blotting

For Western blot analysis, the protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, United States). Proteins were separated and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes, which were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in 0.1% Tween 20 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS), and incubated with anti- MyD88, IRAK1, IRAK4, TRAF6, Erk1/2, p-Erk1/2, p38, p-p38, JNK, p-JNK, NF-κB, p-NF-κB, nectin4, afadin, rac1, and rac1-gtp antibodies (4 °C, overnight) followed by horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies. Bands were visualized using the WEST-ZOL plus Western blotting Detection System (iNtRON, Seongnam, Korea). The relative abundance of proteins was determined by quantitative densitometry with normalization to β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, United States).

Histological assessment of lung tissue

A portion of each left lung was fixed in 4% (v/v) buffered paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Lung sections were stained with H&E for histopathological analyses or with Masson’s trichrome to evaluate the collagen content and distribution, or with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) to detect mucus secretion or with Toluidine stain to detect mast cell. Images were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States).

For double immunofluorescence staining, lung sections were incubated with primary antibodies against Nectin4 and Rac1-GTP overnight at 4 °C. The sections were then incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) and PE-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (Abcam, United Kingdom) at a dilution of 1:200 for 2 h at room temperature. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI, and fluorescence images were acquired using a confocal microscope (Leica, Germany).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

IL-4, IL-5, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-33, ST2, IL-1Racp levels in lung lysates from mice were determined using ELISA. The lower detection limit was set at 2 pg/mL (IL-4), 7 pg/mL (IL-5), 1.88 pg/mL (TNF-α), 2 pg/mL (IFN-γ), 6.85 pg/mL (IL-33), 0.014 ng/mL (ST2), 0.1 ng/mL (IL-1Racp) based on the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 22.0 software. Data are expressed as means ± standard errors of the mean (SEMs). For the TEER time-course experiment, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to evaluate the effects of treatment, time, and treatment × time interaction, followed by Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons. The differences between groups were determined using the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s post hoc test and Mann- Whitney U test. P < 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibodies demonstrate binding affinity and restore barrier function without cytotoxicity in NHBE cells treated with Der p 1

We evaluated the binding affinities of N-1T1C8Ab and N-1T3H9Ab to recombinant human and mouse Nectin4 by ELISA. For human Nectin4, the EC50 values of N-1T1C8Ab and N-1T3H9Ab were 12.9556 and 37.1964 μg/mL, respectively (Figure 1A). For mouse Nectin4, the corresponding EC50 values were 20.7807 and 77.7941 μg/mL, respectively (Figure 1A). These results demonstrate that both antibodies bind to human and mouse Nectin4, confirming their cross-reactivity with mouse Nectin4. To assess cytotoxicity, NHBE cells treated with Der p 1 were exposed to varying concentrations of N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab (1–100 μg/mL) for 48 h (Figure 1B). No significant differences in cell viability were observed following treatment with either antibody compared with the controls. Next, we investigated the effects of N-1T1C8Ab and N-1T3H9Ab on epithelial barrier function by measuring TEER in Der p 1-treated NHBE cells. Repeated-measures analysis revealed significant treatment × time interactions for both N-1T1C8Ab and N-1T3H9Ab (both p < 0.001). At 48 h, treatment with either antibody at 1, 10, or 100 μg/mL significantly attenuated the Der p 1-induced reduction in TEER (Bonferroni-adjusted p < 0.05; Figure 1C). Together, these findings indicate that both antibodies bind Nectin4 without detectable cytotoxicity and are associated with improved epithelial barrier function following Der p 1 exposure.

FIGURE 1

Anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibodies modulate IL-33-related signaling components in NHBE cells treated with Der p 1

Following Der p 1 exposure, the expression levels of IL-33 and its receptor components, ST2 and IL-1 receptor accessory protein (IL-1RAcP), were significantly increased in NHBE cells (p < 0.05; Figures 2A,B). Treatment with N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab showed variable effects on these IL-33-related signaling components, with reductions observed for selected markers and antibody concentrations, although the changes in IL-33 did not reach statistical significance. Overall, the effects of anti-Nectin4 antibody treatment on IL-33-related signaling were marker- and concentration-dependent rather than uniformly suppressive.

FIGURE 2

Anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibodies modulate MyD88/IL-1R-associated kinase (IRAK) signaling in NHBE cells treated with Der p 1

The expression levels of MyD88, IRAK1, IRAK4, and TRAF6 (Figures 3A,E), as well as p-NF-κB/NF-κB, p-JNK/JNK, p-p38/p38, and p-ERK1/2/ERK1/2 (Figures 3C,G), were assessed in NHBE cells after Der p 1 exposure. N-1T1C8Ab significantly reduced IRAK4 expression at 1, 10, and 100 μg/mL, whereas MyD88, IRAK1, TRAF6, NF-κB, JNK, p38, and ERK1/2 showed decreasing trends without statistical significance (Figures 3A–D). In contrast, N-1T3H9Ab significantly reduced MyD88, IRAK1, and TRAF6 expression at 100 μg/mL and IRAK4 expression at 10 μg/mL. NF-κB and JNK showed decreasing trends following N-1T3H9Ab treatment, whereas p38 and ERK1/2 showed no consistent reduction (Figures 3E–H).

FIGURE 3

Anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibodies modulate Afadin/Rac1 signaling in NHBE cells treated with Der p 1

Nectin4/Afadin and Rac1 pathway protein levels were increased in NHBE cells after Der p 1 exposure (Figures 4A,C). However, both the expression of Nectin4/Afadin and the levels of the activated form of Rac1 (Rac1-GTP) were decreased after N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab treatment (Figures 4B,D), indicating that Nectin4 blockade was associated with altered Afadin/Rac1 signaling following Der p 1 exposure.

FIGURE 4

Anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibodies attenuate airway hyperresponsiveness and lung inflammation in asthmatic mice

In the OVA-induced asthma model, mice were treated with N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab as shown in Figure 5A. The OVA group exhibited significantly increased airway resistance (Rn) in response to inhaled methacholine concentrations (MCh; 0–50 mg/mL) compared to the control group, whereas treatment with N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab attenuated this response (Figure 5B). BALF analysis showed a significantly increased total cell numbers and counts of macrophages, eosinophils, neutrophils, and lymphocytes in the OVA group. Anti-Nectin4 antibody treatment reduced total inflammatory cell counts, including eosinophils and neutrophils (Figure 5C). Histopathological examination further revealed prominent peribronchial inflammatory cell infiltration in OVA-exposed mice, which was significantly reduced following N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab treatment (Figures 5D,E). OVA exposure also increased goblet cell hyperplasia and mucus production, collagen deposition, and mast cell accumulation, whereas these pathological changes were attenuated by anti-Nectin4 antibody treatment (Figures 5F–H). Collectively, these results show that anti-Nectin4 antibody treatment ameliorated multiple features of experimental asthma, including airway hyperresponsiveness, inflammatory cell infiltration, and airway remodeling.

FIGURE 5

Anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibodies modulate inflammatory cytokines and IL-33-related signaling components in asthmatic mice

The levels of IL-4 and TNF-α were significantly increased in the OVA group compared with the control group, whereas IL-5 and IFN-γ showed no significant differences (Figure 6A). Treatment with N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab significantly attenuated the OVA-induced increase in IL-4, while no significant changes were observed in IL-5, TNF-α, or IFN-γ following antibody treatment (Figure 6A). In addition, IL-33 and its receptor components, ST2 and IL-1RAcP, were significantly elevated in the OVA group compared with the control group. Anti-Nectin4 antibody treatment reduced the levels of these IL-33-related signaling components (Figure 6B). Overall, anti-Nectin4 antibody treatment was associated with selective modulation of inflammatory cytokines and IL-33-related signaling components in the OVA-induced asthma model.

FIGURE 6

Anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibodies modulate MyD88/IRAK-related signaling in asthmatic mice

To determine whether the signaling changes observed in NHBE cells were also present in vivo, we assessed MyD88/IRAK- and MAPK-related signaling proteins in lung tissues. MyD88, IRAK4, and TRAF6 were significantly increased in the OVA group compared with the control group, whereas IRAK1 showed an increasing trend (Figures 7A,B). Treatment with either N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab significantly reduced MyD88, IRAK1, IRAK4, and TRAF6 compared with the OVA group. In addition, the phosphorylation levels of NF-κB, p38, and ERK1/2 were significantly increased in the OVA group, whereas JNK phosphorylation showed an increasing trend (Figures 7C,D). Among these signaling proteins, ERK1/2 phosphorylation was significantly reduced by both anti-Nectin4 antibodies, whereas NF-κB, JNK, and p38 phosphorylation was not significantly altered following antibody treatment.

FIGURE 7

Anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibodies modulate Afadin/Rac1 signaling in asthmatic mice

Nectin4 and Afadin expression and Rac1-GTP levels were increased in the lungs of OVA-exposed mice compared with the control group (Figures 8A,B). Treatment with N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab reduced Nectin4 and Afadin expression as well as Rac1-GTP levels. Consistent with the Western blot results, double immunofluorescence staining showed increased Nectin4 and Rac1-GTP signals in the lungs of OVA-exposed mice, which were reduced following treatment with either anti-Nectin4 antibody (Figures 8C,D).

FIGURE 8

Discussion

The study was designed to determine whether anti–Nectin4 antibody reduces airway inflammation and hyperreactivity in a murine model of allergen-induced asthma. We observed that intratracheal administration of anti-Nectin4 antibody before allergen challenge reduced IL-4 levels, airway resistance, and inflammatory cell infiltration in asthmatic mice. These effects were accompanied by changes in Nectin4/Afadin–Rac1 signaling and selected components of IL-33- and MyD88/IRAK-related signaling in bronchial epithelial cells and asthmatic mice. However, the present data demonstrate associations and do not establish that modulation of these pathways is required for the observed effects of Nectin4 blockade.

Junctional proteins are essential components of cell-cell adhesion in epithelial tissues, playing a pivotal role in maintaining the integrity of the epithelial barrier (). In asthma, disruption of epithelial junctional proteins increases airway permeability and facilitates the penetration of allergens and inflammatory mediators into the airway tissue (). This process promotes inflammatory cell recruitment and contributes to airway hyperresponsiveness and chronic inflammation. Several junctional proteins, including claudins, occludin, and cadherins, have been reported to regulate epithelial barrier function and inflammatory responses (; ; ; Tan et al., 2019; Xiao et al., 2011). Consistent with the importance of epithelial barrier integrity in asthma, Der p 1 exposure reduced TEER in NHBE cells in the present study, whereas anti-Nectin4 antibody treatment attenuated this reduction. This finding suggests that Nectin4 blockade may be associated with preservation of epithelial barrier function, although individual tight junction proteins were not evaluated.

Nectin4 is an immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule that functions at both adherens and tight junctions (Takai et al., 2008b). It contributes to cell–cell adhesion and plays an important role in maintaining epithelial tissue integrity and regulating intercellular signaling pathways (). Through interactions with adaptor proteins such as Afadin, Nectin4 may influence intracellular signaling pathways involved in cellular proliferation, inflammation, and cytoskeletal organization. In the present study, anti-Nectin4 antibody treatment was accompanied by changes in Nectin4/Afadin expression and Rac1 activation in both NHBE cells and asthmatic mice, supporting a potential association between Nectin4-related junctional signaling and the observed effects of antibody treatment.

Our previous study identified Nectin4 as a potential biomarker for asthma. Nectin4 deletion reduced airway inflammation and inflammatory cytokine production and was associated with reduced activation of the Src/Rac1 signaling pathway (). Together with the present findings, these observations further support a role for Nectin4 in airway inflammatory responses, although the specific contribution of Afadin/Rac1 signaling to the effects of anti-Nectin4 antibodies remains to be determined.

To date, Nectin4 is highly expressed in a variety of tumors while showing minimal expression in normal tissues, making it an attractive target for antibody-based cancer therapies, including antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) (; ; ). Notably, the anti-Nectin4 antibody–drug conjugate Enfortumab vedotin has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, indicating that Nectin4 is a therapeutically actionable target in human disease (; ). Although Nectin4–targeted therapy has not yet been explored in asthma, these findings provide a rationale for investigating Nectin4 blockade as a strategy to modulate airway inflammation. Unlike Nectin4-targeted ADCs used in oncology, the antibodies investigated here were evaluated for their potential to modulate Nectin4-associated epithelial and inflammatory responses rather than to deliver a cytotoxic payload. In the present study, anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibody treatment was associated with improved epithelial barrier function and attenuation of airway inflammation in vitro and in vivo. Changes in Nectin4/Afadin–Rac1 signaling and selected components of IL-33/MyD88-related signaling were observed following antibody treatment. Administration of N-1T1C8Ab or N-1T3H9Ab reduced airway inflammation, airway resistance, and the number of immune cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Histological analysis further demonstrated decreased inflammatory cell infiltration, goblet cell hyperplasia, fibrosis, and mast cell accumulation in lung tissues. These findings suggest that anti-Nectin4 treatment may attenuate airway inflammation and associated pathological features in this preclinical asthma model.

Currently, several monoclonal antibodies are available for asthma treatment, including anti-IgE, anti-IL-5, anti-IL-5 receptor α, and anti-IL-4 receptor α antibodies (). Although these biologics improve disease control in many patients, their clinical efficacy varies depending on asthma phenotype and inflammatory profile. Consequently, additional therapeutic targets, particularly epithelial-derived alarmins such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), IL-25, and IL-33, are actively being investigated (). Because IL-33 participates in both type 2 and non-type 2 inflammatory pathways, targeting IL-33-related signaling may provide broader therapeutic benefits than strategies focusing exclusively on type 2 inflammation (). In contrast to these cytokine- or cytokine receptor-targeted approaches, Nectin4 is an epithelial cell-adhesion molecule, and its targeting may represent a distinct strategy involving epithelial barrier function and associated inflammatory responses. However, further studies are required to determine whether Nectin4 targeting provides therapeutic advantages over currently available or emerging biologics.

IL-33 plays an important role in the initiation of allergic airway inflammation by activating immune cells such as eosinophils, mast cells, and innate lymphoid cells (; Stolarski et al., 2010; ). Binding of IL-33 to the ST2 receptor recruits the adaptor protein MyD88, leading to activation of downstream inflammatory signaling pathways including NF-κB and MAPKs (; ). In the present study, anti-Nectin4 antibody treatment was associated with changes in IL-33-related signaling components and MyD88-related signaling. However, the effects were not consistent across all signaling components or antibody concentrations. Therefore, these findings support an association between Nectin4 blockade and IL-33/MyD88-related signaling rather than establishing suppression of this pathway as a primary mechanism of action.

This study has several limitations. Detailed structural changes in the airway epithelium and the expression of tight junction proteins such as claudins, ZO-1, and occludin were not evaluated. In addition, although anti-Nectin4 treatment was associated with changes in IL-33/MyD88-related signaling, the present study does not establish whether Nectin4 directly regulates IL-33 or whether these changes occur secondarily to improved epithelial barrier function and reduced airway inflammation. Furthermore, the hierarchical relationship between Nectin4/Afadin–Rac1 signaling and IL-33/MyD88-related signaling remains unclear. Thus, whether these pathways are independently modulated or functionally interconnected following Nectin4 blockade cannot be determined from the current data. Further mechanistic studies are needed to clarify these relationships and determine their contribution to the observed effects of anti-Nectin4 antibodies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our findings show that anti-Nectin4 antibody treatment is associated with improved epithelial barrier function and reduced eosinophilic airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness. Further preclinical studies are warranted to characterize the mechanisms, safety, and pharmacological properties of anti-Nectin4 antibodies before their potential clinical application in asthma can be considered.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

P-HL: Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft, Validation, Methodology. MA: Writing – review and editing, Validation, Methodology. SY: Methodology, Validation, Writing – review and editing. A-SJ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, Conceptualization.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2020R1A2C1006506) and Soonchunhyang University.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Summary

Keywords

airway inflammation, antibody, asthma, drug evaluation, Nectin4

Citation

Lee P-H, An M, Yoon S and Jang A-S (2026) Anti-Nectin4 monoclonal antibodies attenuate airway inflammation and epithelial barrier dysfunction in asthma. Front. Pharmacol. 17:1931755. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2026.1931755

Received

08 July 2026

Revised

30 August 2026

Accepted

07 September 2026

Published

07 October 2026

Volume

17 - 2026

Edited by

Wuqiang Zhu, Mayo Clinic Arizona, United States

Reviewed by

Yura Son, Mayo Clinic Arizona, United States

Sachin Budhathoki, University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: An-Soo Jang,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics