Abstract
Throughout their species seasonal succession, diatoms of the Arctic Ocean experience a radical habitat transformation, from surviving the dimly lit winter within sea-ice or in the water column, to rapid growth under increasing irradiances, forming massive spring blooms beneath melting ice and later in open waters. Therefore, their evolutionary path has been moulded by the opposing challenges of maximizing light capture part of the year while maintaining highly efficient photoprotection capacities to limit photodamage upon bursts of supra-optimal illumination. Two main photoprotection mechanisms exist in diatoms i) nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) supported primarily by the xanthophyll cycle (XC) and stress-related Lhcx antenna proteins and, ii) a rapid repair cycle of photosystem (PS) II core protein, PsbA, upon photodamage. Previous studies suggest that freezing temperatures slow protein turnover and favour photoprotection strategies that rely primarily upon XC-NPQ in polar taxa. We aim to revisit this hypothesis by dissecting the high-light response of five Arctic diatom species that dominate contrasting ecological niches: sea-ice, marginal ice-zone and open waters. We exposed each species to a high-light stress and subsequent recovery period under low light, with and without, inhibitors of XC-NPQ (dithiothreitol) or of plastid protein translation (lincomycin), blocking de novo replacement of PsbA. We confirmed the crucial role of XC-NPQ in protecting PSII but also report unexpected observations that challenge our current understanding of psychrophile species response to light stress. First, the impact of lincomycin on PSII photoinhibition was stronger than that of DTT, despite PsbA turnover being undetectable by immunoblots in most cases. Second, while our data support planktonic species showing better tolerance to high light than sympagic species, we found unsuspected diversity in photoprotection strategies. We hypothesize that these differences support a gradient from conservative strategies, possibly optimized for survival in the extreme sea-ice habitat of sympagic species, to productivity-oriented strategies in open water planktonic species dominating during the bloom period. In the transforming, brighter, Arctic Ocean, the adaptedness of this community-wide strategy scheme could be undermined, shaking up the historical dominance of certain diatom taxa.
Introduction
In the Arctic Ocean, microalgal growth is constrained by seasonal light availability characterized by extreme photoperiod cycles interacting with the snow and sea-ice cover formation and melt dynamics (). This radical seasonal habitat transformation leads to shifts in light intensity which can be stressful to photosynthetic life. Nonetheless, microalgae, and particularly diatoms (Pierella Karlusich et al., 2025), thrive in the winter-to-spring transition, and exploit the changing environment through a highly productive seasonal species succession () (Figure 1A). Typically, pennate diatoms overwhelmingly dominate sea-ice (sympagic) communities, whereas a mixture of pennate species (such as Fragilariopsis and Pseudo-nitzschia genera) and centric species (notably the Chaetoceros and Thalassiosira genera) are found in water beneath snow-covered ice (; ; Poulin et al., 2011; ), together with other phytoplankters such as Phaeocystis sp. (). As melting progresses, light penetrates deeper in the water column and most of the time, annual productivity climaxes in massive blooms consisting mostly of centric diatoms extending to the marginal ice-zone (ice-covers ≈50% of water) (Payne et al., 2024). In open waters, as nutrient concentrations decline and grazing pressure surges, different specialization patterns are observed among centric species, found either near the surface or in the deepening chlorophyll (Chl) a maximum (; ). Therefore, contrasted photoadaptation and photoprotection strategies, spanning a broad range of growth light optima and maximal growth rates, are observed in Arctic diatoms occupying different ecological niches (; ). Importantly, all Arctic diatoms’ show high plasticity enabling survival under both prolonged winter darkness (; ; ) and supra-optimal light conditions (; Leu et al., 2016; ; ; ). For example, sympagic species like Nitzschia frigida start growing under infinitesimal light intensities () and persist late into the melt season when averaged daily irradiance at the ice-water interface can exceed 100 µmol photons m-2 s-1 (; ). Likewise, Thalassiosira and Chaetoceros species start growing under the sea-ice cover but can experience illumination of up to 1,000 µmol photons m-2 s-1 in open waters (). Additionally, light fluctuations are caused by advective transport beneath snow-covered sea-ice with heterogenous optical properties (Tao et al., 2024), sudden mixing events induced by shelf break (Randelhoff et al., 2018) and wind driven mixing which is being amplified under climate change ().
FIGURE 1
While increasing light transmission to the Arctic Ocean (through shrinking sea-ice cover) has supported greater diatom productivity in recent years (Lewis et al., 2020), thus possibly more biomass being transferred to upper trophic levels, high-light stress can also decrease their nutritive quality (Leu et al., 2010; ). Light stress also induces photodamage to photosystem (PS) II, which can eventually lead to photoinhibition (). Therefore, uneven capacities to overcome intensifying light stresses among Arctic taxa could impact future community composition and ecosystem functioning. Upon excessive light absorption, reduced electron acceptors downstream of PSII accumulate and decrease its photochemical efficiency. Thus, excited Chl a lifetime and the likelihood of generating toxic radicals increase, promoting photodamages to PSII by oxidising its core proteins, PsbA and PsbD (sometime referred to as D1 and D2, respectively) (). Limiting these deleterious effects is uniquely challenging in polar environments as consumption of ATP and NADPH by the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle is severely slowed down by low temperature (Young et al., 2015). Two main photoprotection features allow diatoms to limit photodamage and photoinhibition.
Firstly, the deployment of mechanisms favouring dissipation of excess absorbed light energy by PSII as heat — at the expense of competing processes like photochemistry and fluorescence — collectively termed nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) (). In diatoms, the main NPQ component is related to a one-step xanthophyll cycle (XC), by which diadinoxanthin (DD) conversion to diatoxanthin (DT) is favoured under high light (). Accumulating DT interacting with stress-related proteins (Lhcx) in PSII behaves as a quencher enhancing heat dissipation (; ). In darkness or under low light, the opposite DT conversion to DD is favoured, but NPQ relaxation time varies broadly between species and conditions. In temperate diatoms, the XC-dependent NPQ component typically relaxes in 15–20 min (). Strikingly, sustained XC-NPQ with relaxation prolonged for more than 24 h in darkness is observed in some Arctic species, especially ice-related low light specialists (; ). Moreover, Arctic diatoms can contain enormous quantities of xanthophylls (; ) implying high xanthophylls concentrations in the thylakoid lipid membranes (), which could provide further photoprotection through antioxidants () or membrane fluidity regulation functions ().
Secondly, photoinhibition is countered by the PSII repair cycle, in which the FtsH hexameric protease degrades damaged PsbA/PsbD allowing replacement by functional ones (). Before repair, broken PSII act as non-photochemical quenchers, thus protecting neighbouring active PSII (through so-called “photoinhibition quenching” or qI (Nawrocki et al., 2021)). So far, trade-offs between these NPQ and PSII turnover have been little studied in polar diatoms. From a handful of studies (; Petrou et al., 2010; ; ), the emerging big picture is that freezing temperatures restrict the velocity of PSII repair, such that polar species are more reliant upon XC-NPQ for photoprotection. This conclusion is supported by similar observations in cold-adapted green algae (Pocock et al., 2007; Ni et al., 2017), Phaeocystis antarctica () and the temperature-dependence of PSII-repair rate in the temperate Thalassiosira pseudonana (Wu et al., 2012). The contributions of XC-NPQ and qI to total NPQ are often distinguished on the basis of their characteristic relaxation times; on the order of tens of minutes for DD to DT conversion (; ), and hours for PSII repair in temperate diatoms, which can also be further described via PsbA quantification by immunoblots (Wu et al., 2011; ; Nawrocki et al., 2021). However, the extent of sustained XC-NPQ in Arctic diatoms (; ), with kinetics overlapping PSII repair, compromises the power of this approach (see rationale in Material and methods).
Consequently, to understand how divergent photoadaptive strategies support diatoms ecological success in the Arctic, and in turn impact the rest of the trophic chain (Leu et al., 2016), it is not sufficient to study their growth under stable light conditions (; ; ; ). We must also investigate how they overcome bursts of supra-optimal light intensities. We tested the hypothesis that Arctic species are more reliant on XC-NPQ than upon rapid PSII repair to overcome acute light stress (Figure 1A). We used the same panel of five species, dominating in contrasting seasonal niches from sea-ice to open waters, for which we previously documented a low-to-higher light specialization gradient (), and distinct XC-NPQ behaviour (). This unprecedently large species panel and comprehensive experimental design, for a study on high-light stress in polar microalgae, allow us to position previous assumptions in an ecological context. As such, we hypothesized that if rapid PSII-repair cycle plays an important role in Arctic diatoms, it would most likely be observed in late succession planktonic species, showing physiological traits more like their temperate counterparts (Schiffrine et al., 2020; ; ). All strains were subjected to identical high-light stress, either without or with drugs inhibiting XC-NPQ (dithiothreitol) or plastid genome translation (lincomycin), thereby preventing PSII repair, for three treatments in total. We report that ice-related species tend to be more susceptible to photoinhibition than planktonic ones. Like previous studies on polar taxa, we did not observe pronounced PsbA degradation with immunoblots (Petrou et al., 2010; Ni et al., 2017). Although the contribution of PSII repair remains unresolved, we unexpectedly report that in four out of five Arctic diatoms, plastid genome translation contributes as much, if not more, than XC-NPQ to limiting PSII photoinhibition. Our discussion brings a fresh perspective on the unsuspected complexity and multifaceted photoprotection strategies of Arctic diatoms in the context of their extreme habitats and beyond the frontline provided by XC-NPQ.
Materials and methods
Diatoms culturing and acclimation
The same five Arctic diatom strains typical of contrasting seasonal light niches as in () were used; Nitzschia frigida (kindly provided by A. Juhl), Fragilariopsis cylindrus (CCMP1102, Culture Collection of Marine Phytoplankton), Thalassiosira gravida (RCC5318, Roscoff Culture Collection), Chaetoceros neogracilis (RCC2278) and Chaetoceros gelidus (RCC2046). Throughout the manuscript, we use the term ice-related species to refer to N. frigida, F. cylindrus and T. gravida altogether (Figure 1A), but exclude the two Chaetoceros species mostly found in open waters. The reader is referred to () for a thorough description of each species ecological niche. Cultures were grown in seawater (Baffin Bay 67.48 N; 63.79 W), sterilised by filtration (0.2 µm) and enriched with f/2 medium plus silicates. Culture triplicates of 600 mL were acclimated under 50 µmol photons m-2 s-1 (measured with a US-SQS/L spherical quantum sensor (Walz, Germany)) and maintained in exponential growth by diluting with fresh medium every two-to-three day. Cell numbers and diameter were measured using a Beckman Multisizer 4 Coulter Counter (Miami, FL, United States) except for N. frigida which required microscopy counting (Utermöhl method). The Chl a concentration (estimated with a 10AU fluorometer, Turner Designs, San Jose, CA, United States), cell diameter and growth rate were monitored every two-to-three day. Our previous studies showed that using this common growth light intensity enables high XC-NPQ capacity () in all species, while remaining reasonably close to their maximal growth rate (). Continuous 24 h illumination was used to avoid potential biases due to diurnal rhythmicity of NPQ (). Cultures growth and all experiments were conducted in a 0 °C lab.
Experimental design and variable fluorescence approach
A Water-PAM fluorometer (Walz) was used to monitor minimal fluorescence, F0 (open reaction centres), with a blue modulated measuring light and maximal fluorescence, FM, probed with the same measuring light while a saturating multiple turnover flash (6,000 µmol photons m-2 s-1, 600 ms) reduces all PSII electron acceptors (closed reaction centres). To let enough time for sustained XC-NPQ to relax and measure the true maximal dark-adapted quantum yield of PSII, FV/FM, calculated as (FM-F0)/FM, we incubated cultures of different species to varying time in darkness which we had previously defined in (). These dark incubation times ranged from 24 h for N. frigida and F. cylindrus, to 12 h for T. gravida, and to 20 min for C. neogracilis and C. gelidus. With NPQ fully relaxed, we also measured the PSII functional absorption cross-section (σPSII) with a single-turnover flash (10,000 µmol photons m-2 s-1, 100 µs) of blue light (455 nm) applied by a Fluorescence Induction and Relaxation (FIRe) fluorometer (Satlantic, Canada, curves fitted with the MATLAB software using the FIReWORX script written by Audrey Barnett (https://sourceforge.net/projects/fireworx/). Dark-acclimated cultures were then transferred to a custom-made glass vessel lightened with LED and maintained agitated with a magnetic stirrer. A light stress was then applied by exposing the cultures to 250 µmol photons m-2 s-1 for 2 h, an ecologically relevant common light-stress level. Converted into daily irradiances considering the chosen 24 h photoperiod, 250 µmol photons m-2s-1 is comparable with the irradiance sea-ice species experience during their last days of growth, or Arctic planktonic cells at the deep chlorophyll maximum being brought up to the surface by vertical mixing, making it suitable for our comparative ecophysiological study (see Figure 1 in ()). Crucially, the period of sea-ice breakup corresponds to the broadest overlaps between each species niche, while more intense light stress, combined with nutrient scarcity, is a challenge predominantly faced by late-season specialists like the Chaetoceros genus. The light-stress treatment was then followed by a recovery period of at least 1 h at 5 µmol photons m-2 s-1, which was extended in the species for which it was insufficient to fully relax NPQ in control treatment, i.e., the described light stress here without inhibitor addition (see Results). The same experiment was repeated for three treatments i) control, ii) with addition of dithiothreitol (DTT) (500 µM final concentration (Lavaud et al., 2002)) to inhibit DD de-epoxidation to DT and therefore XC-NPQ and, iii) with addition of lincomycin (500 μg/mL final concentration (Wu et al., 2012)) to inhibit plastid genome translation, thus PsbA de novo synthesis, and thereby PSII-repair ().
At different time points (see Results), 3 mL aliquots were sampled and transferred into the Water-PAM cuvette and left in the dark for 15 s before measuring minimal and maximal fluorescence, termed F0’ and FM’ respectively. In this context, FV’/FM’ represents the potential quantum yield of PSII in the dark, for a given NPQ state, rather than a true maximal (FV/FM) or effective (ΔF/FM’ or ϕPSII) quantum yield, measured under actinic light. We note that 15 s is possibly not long enough for full reoxidation of PSII acceptors in the context of high-light stress (which would increase the measured F0’), therefore we limited our analysis of variations in FV’/FM’ to the subsequent recovery period under low light (5 µmol photons m-1 s-1). We made this compromise — using a short 15 s in the dark before measuring variable fluorescence — to avoid underestimating NPQ due to the potential relaxation of fast NPQ components. The quantum yield of NPQ (φNPQ) was calculated as F0’/FM’- F0’/FM and NPQ as FM/FM’-1. Because some Arctic diatom species show sustained XC-NPQ relaxation overlapping with times characteristic of PSII-repair, it is not possible to distinguish XC-NPQ from qI simply by analysing relaxation kinetics as in temperate organisms (). Instead, we used the following logic. The FV’/FM’ levels are constrained by two factors: i) any process that compromises photochemistry (like photodamage) and, ii) kinetic competition with nonphotochemical quenchers. To disentangle these effects, we can predict how NPQ alone — assuming a Stern-Volmer relationship — should affect FV’/FM’. Deviations from this predicted value can then be attributed to loss of photochemistry due to photodamage more confidently. To do so, we used the photochemical quenching (qP), parameter as a diagnostic tool (with supporting evidence for the validity of this parameter in diatoms provided below). Originally introduced to estimate the extent of photochemical quenching in a sample exposed to light (), qP is calculated as:
Where FS is the minimal fluorescence in steady-state under actinic light, and F0’ is the minimal fluorescence expected if all reaction centres were open while NPQ remains active. The crucial F0’ is often unavailable experimentally, but can be derived experimentally as (Oxborough and Baker, 1997):if it is assumed that all decrease in maximal fluorescence (FM’) is imputable to a Stern-Volmer-like quencher. In our case, with samples exposed to low light during recovery and then incubated 15 s in darkness, we have access to a measured F0’ which can be compared to its theoretical value. Therefore, in:qPd gives variable fluorescence during low light relaxation, normalized to what it would be if the only process influencing FM’ and F0’ was a Stern-Volmer-type quenching (qPd = 1 under this condition). Values of 1-qPd above 0 (i.e., F0’ > theo. F0’) indicate the extent of PSII photochemistry limitation caused by persistent reduced electron acceptors or photodamaged reaction centres, independently of NPQ level (see in plants (Ruban and Murchie, 2012)). Many reasons suggest this approach to distinguish decrease in FV’/FM’ mediated by NPQ from photoinhibition could be even more powerful in diatoms than in plants, and allow circumvention of some of the difficulties that sustained XC-NPQ entails in Arctic species; i) the theoretical relationship between NPQ and PSII photochemistry has been validated in some pennate diatoms (), ii) the Stern-Volmer linear relationship between NPQ and DT is robust in diatoms (including the five species used here ()) and, iii) diatoms lack state transitions (a non-Stern-Volmer-like photoprotection mechanism) (Owens, 1986). However, caution in data interpretation remains crucial as NPQ dynamics in these Arctic species have yet to be thoroughly examined. Moreover, during prolonged and intense light stress, changes in PSII cross-section, due to Chl a bleaching or de novo synthesis of PSII antenna/pigments for instance, are possible and would affect reference values of FM and F0. We monitored pigment concentrations to confirm that Chl a remained roughly stable (Supplementary Figure S1).
Pigment sampling and quantification
Before, and at various time points during high-light stress and following low light recovery, sub-samples of 15 mL were collected and quickly filtered onto GF/F filters (Whatman®, 0.7 μm, 25 mm), flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until analysis. Samples extracted in 100% methanol were mixed (70:30, vol:vol) with a buffer solution (tetrabutylammonium acetate (28 mmol L−1)) following a method adapted from Ras et al. (2008). Pigments content was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography with a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C8 3.5 μm column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States). The de-epoxidation state (DES, in %) of the xanthophyll pool was calculated as:
Protein extraction and immunoblots
Samples of 25–35 mL were collected for characterization of protein allocation traits (before high-light stress or inhibitor addition). The number of replicates was always at least three (triplicate in control treatment) and extended up to 9 for some species/protein targets. Additionally, at various time points during high light experiments material was sampled to monitor PsbA degradation/repair kinetics, for all treatments (except only control in F. cylindrus) and possible regulation of Lhcx isoforms, for only the control treatment. Samples were filtered onto GF/F filters, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until extraction. Filters were thawed and placed in FastPrep lysing vials with 400 uL of 1X Protein Extraction Buffer (PEB, Agrisera (Sweden) AS08_300). Cells were lysed for 3 cycles of 60 s at 6.5 m s-1 with 60 s intervals on ice between cycles. The lysing vials were centrifuged at 16,100 x g for 5 min, the supernatant, which contained cell debris, was transferred to a 600 µL microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged again at 16,100 x g for 3 min. The resulting supernatant was transferred to another 600 uL microcentrifuge tube and stored at −80 °C until analysis. Immunoblots analysis was carried out as described in (Wu et al., 2012), except that the FCP6 blot was incubated overnight with a 1:5,000 dilution of the primary antibody in 2% ECL blocking solution immediately after transfer. Primary antibodies purchased from Agrisera were diluted as follows: PsbA/D1 (AS05 084) 1:10,000, RbcL (the large sub-unit of Rubisco) 1:10,000 (AS01 017), FtsH 1:5,000 (AS11 1789). The FCP6 antibody (provided by Dr. Erhard Rhiel) was diluted 1:5,000. The Anti-FCP6 detects all four Lhcx isoforms in Phaeodactylum tricornutum (), and samples of this species filtered after a similar 2 h high-light stress (1,000 µmol photons m-2 s-1) were used as pseudo-standards for this assay. After washing, all blots were incubated in a 1:15,000 dilution of secondary antibody (anti-rabbit HRP, Bio-Rad, lot 64230791) and agitated gently on a rotator table for 1 h at room temperature. Chemiluminescence was detected using Amersham™ ECL Select (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, now Cytiva, RPN2235) and imaged with a VersaDoc CCD system (Bio-Rad). Band densities were quantified using ImageLab software (v4.0, Bio-Rad) based on a standard curve.
Curve fitting and statistical analysis
All curve fitting and statistical analyses were performed in R software version 4.3.0. The nls. multstart package (Padfield et al., 2021) was used to test different non-linear functions to fit φNPQ relaxation as a function of low light recovery time (t) and a Hill function was selected based on the lowest median Akaike Information Criterion across species Treatment (more details in Supplementary Figure S2):where φNPQM is the maximum extrapolated φNPQ value immediately at light extinction, t50 is the recovery time for which half of φNPQ has relaxed and n is a sigmoidicity factor.
We integrated this analysis in a comprehensive framework including previous studies on this species panel (; ), to scrutinize how different photophysiological parameters may shape interspecies high-light stress response on statistical basis. We focused on parameters that reflect the interplay of adaptation and acclimation before exposure to high-light stress, encompassing growth rate, PSII integrity and light absorption, productivity assessed through 14C-uptake curves and PSII electron transport, photoprotection provided by NPQ and the XC, and protein allocation strategies (total of 19 parameters). Because not all parameters were measured simultaneously on the same biological replicates, and we aimed at capturing variation arising from adaptation and acclimation rather than replicate-level noise, we used the mean values from three independent replicates for each species. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey post-hoc tests were used to confirm significant differences between species for a given parameter.
A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on the 19 acclimation parameters across the 5 species (mean centred and scaled) was conducted to reduce dimensionality and visualize the top contributors in a biplot. We previously observed that during low light recovery, FV’/FM’ and qPd behave differently across species, thus providing complementary information (see Results). Therefore, we summed the value of both parameters after 5 and 60 min of low light recovery and divided them by four (giving a value bounded by 0 and 1) to obtain a comprehensive index of PSII inhibition for all species and treatments. We appended these computed PSII inhibition indices to their associated species treatments, resulting in a total of 22 parameters. We then calculated Pearson correlation coefficients among the parameters using cor() function in R.
Results
Protein allocation strategies
All protein allocation traits explored revealed significant differences between species (ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test, P-value <0.05) (Figures 1B–D). The molar ratio between the PsbA PSII core protein and Chl a was the highest in the open water Chaetoceros gelidus (0.69 ± 0.26 mmol·mol-1) and the lowest in the dual sympagic/planktonic life form Fragilariopsis cylindrus (0.15 ± 0.07 mmol·mol-1) (Figure 1B). Nitzschia frigida, Thalassiosira gravida and C. neogracilis showed intermediate values (between 0.25 and 0.41 mmol·mol-1) significantly lower than in C. gelidus. The molar ratio between the large subunit of Rubisco and PsbA (a proxy of carbon fixation versus photochemistry capacities (Li and Campbell, 2017)) was significantly higher in C. neogracilis (222.91 ± 90.5 mol·mol-1) than in all species (as low as 21.14 mol·mol-1 in C. gelidus) except F. cylindrus (108.67 ± 36.83 mol·mol-1) (Figure 1C). A similar interspecific pattern was observed for the FtsH/PsbA molar ratio (a proxy for PSII turnover capacities (Li et al., 2016; )). The highest average values were observed in C. neogracilis and F. cylindrus, intermediates ones in N. frigida and T. gravida, and values one order of magnitude lower in C. gelidus (Figure 1D).
NPQ and xanthophyll cycle (XC) kinetics over high-light stress and low light recovery
Culture of the five species were submitted to high-light stress (2 h under 250 µmol photons m-2 s-1) in three different treatments; control, with addition of DTT (inhibiting diatoxanthin (DT) conversion to diadinoxanthin (DD)) and with addition of lincomycin (inhibiting plastid protein translation, and therefore de novo PsbA synthesis). We first focus on NPQ dynamics during the high-light stress. All species reached substantial φNPQ; C. gelidus reached the highest values, close to 0.8, while T. gravida displayed the lowest values, especially in the first hour of stress (0.4–0.5 φNPQ) (Figure 2A). Under DTT treatment, φNPQ was, unsurprisingly, much lower, remaining 0.2 in all species during the first 15 min (Figure 2B). Subsequently, φNPQ increased roughly linearly with time in all species despite DTT addition, with the steepest increase in N. frigida. Comparing lincomycin to control treatments, T. gravida was the only species showing a noticeable increase in φNPQ, reaching a final value of 0.6 (lincomycin) compared to 0.5 (control) (Figure 2C).
FIGURE 2
During low light recovery (5 µmol photons m-2 s-1), N. frigida and T. gravida consistently showed slower φNPQ relaxation (Figures 2D–F, see also Supplementary Figure S2). Since φNPQ above 0.2 remained after 1 h of recovery in control treatment only for these species, we decided to keep monitoring ϕNPQ relaxation over a total of 6 h (N. frigida) and 12 h (T. gravida). Chaetoceros gelidus showed an outstandingly fast φNPQ relaxation half-time (t1/2) of ≈1.5 min under control and lincomycin treatments (Supplementary Figure S2). Excluding DTT treatments, this relaxation half-time is approximately one order of magnitude faster than the second fastest t1/2 measured, in C. neogracilis under lincomycin treatments (t1/2 not available for control treatment in this species). Despite slower φNPQ relaxation in the three ice-related species, near full relaxation was reached at their respective last measurement time point (Figure 2). Under DTT treatment, the starkest contrast in the reversibility of φNPQ was seen in C. gelidus, with φNPQ remaining at roughly 0.25 after 1 h of low light recovery. Stable Chl a concentrations over the treatments suggest persistent NPQ is not an artefact due to Chl a bleaching (Supplementary Figure S1). Chaetoceros gelidus also contrasted with the ice-related species in that its φNPQ relaxation was not slowed down by lincomycin addition (versus control treatment) (Supplementary Figure S2). However, despite slower φNPQ relaxation upon lincomycin addition for most species, no species showed a marked increase in non-reversible φNPQ between control and lincomycin treatments at the end of low light recovery.
Under control treatment, all species converted large amount of diadinoxanthin (DD) to diatoxanthin (DT) (Figure 3, the de-epoxidation state (DES) is shown in Supplementary Figure S3) via the XC. As expected in diatoms (), DT conversion strongly correlated with NPQ induction, with or without lincomycin addition (Supplementary Figure S4). The largest DT concentrations were reached in F. cylindrus (≈25 mol · 100 mol Chl a−1), about twice as much as the second largest, C. neogracilis, and five times more than in T. gravida (lowest concentrations). Fragilariopsis cylindrus also reached the largest DES with 75%, but the gap in DES compared to other species was narrower than for DT accumulation (all reached at least 60%) (Supplementary Figure S3). Treatment with DTT nearly fully abolished DT conversion in all species but N. frigida (Figure 3A), the species that also reached the highest φNPQ under DTT treatment (Figure 2B). In N. frigida and F. cylindrus, substantial DT remained after φNPQ had fully reversed (except with DTT) (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3
Quantum yield of PSII and photochemical quenching over low light recovery
In Arctic diatoms, XC-NPQ relaxation kinetically overlaps with typical hour-scale range of PSII repair usually associated to the reversal of the slow, qI, component of NPQ (Wu et al., 2011; ; Nawrocki et al., 2021). Indeed, in our previous study, the three ice-related species investigated here took more than 12 h to fully relax NPQ when transferred from the growth light level used here to complete darkness (). As an alternative, we here chose to investigate the parallel dynamics of the maximal potential quantum yield of PSII (FV’/FM’) and the potential photochemical quenching parameter in the dark (qPd) during low light recovery. The maximal potential capacity to use light for PSII photochemistry during recovery is shown by FV’/FM’, but it does not discriminate between losses due to a Stern-Volmer-like NPQ, damaged PSII or persistently reduced PSII acceptors (closed reaction centres, not expected in darkness). After 60 min of low light in control treatments, the recovery of FV’/FM’ (relative to its initial value) was almost complete in C. neogracilis, F. cylindrus and C. gelidus, but below 70% in T. gravida and N. frigida, for which full recovery was only reached after more than 3 h of low light (Figure 4A). Under DTT treatment, FV’/FM’ recovery was clearly slower and did not return to value as high as for control treatment, with a much stronger effect on N. frigida, T. gravida and C. gelidus (Figure 4B). With lincomycin addition, FV’/FM’ recovered value after 60 min of low light was even lower than with DTT treatments in all species but C. gelidus (Figure 4C). Interestingly, FV’/FM’ recovery seemed to plateau with lincomycin (more visible in N. frigida and both Chaetoceros), which was not the case with DTT addition for which recovery progressed nearly linearly with time for the full duration of low light exposure.
FIGURE 4
With some caveats (see Material and methods), the potential photochemical quenching in the dark, i.e., qPd, can be used to assess decreases in PSII photochemistry beyond the effect of NPQ strictly arising from a Stern-Volmer-like mechanism (see Supplementary Figure S5 and (Ruban and Murchie, 2012; )). Accordingly, the reversal of processes that compromise PSII photochemistry, like an unusually slow “reopening” of reaction centres or the repair of damaged PSII, can be visualized by plotting 1-qPd as a function of time during low light recovery. In this representation, 1-qPd = 1 indicates complete PSII inactivation. For example, after 5 min of low light recovery under control treatment, 1-qPd equals roughly 0 in C. neogracilis (Figure 5A, green symbols). This suggests that the ≈50% decrease in FV’/FM’ measured simultaneously in this species/treatment (Figure 4A) was entirely due to XC-NPQ outcompeting PSII photochemistry, rather than photodamaged PSII. To summarize these relationships, FV’/FM’ (normalized to the initial FV/FM value) is plotted against 1-qPd in Figure 6. A theoretical linear relationship with a slope of −1 is expected if FV’/FM’ decreases solely through loss of photochemistry capacities — either via photodamage or reaction centre closure — rather than kinetic competition with other quenchers (i.e., NPQ) (see Supplementary Figure S5 for more details). As such, Figure 6A confirms that XC-NPQ strongly influences FV’/FM’, but not necessarily qPd in the control treatment. The exception is C. gelidus, for which the near-instantaneous ϕNPQ relaxation was not accompanied by complete FV’/FM’ recovery (Figure 3), suggesting some PSII remained damaged or closed (1-qPd>0) (Figure 5) longer than it took XC-NPQ to relax (Figure 2). A contrario, under DTT treatment, decrease in FV’/FM’ is strongly correlated to 1-qPd, suggesting damaged or closed reaction centres predominantly drive the decline in FV’/FM’ rather than nonphotochemical processes competing with PSII photochemistry (Figure 6B). Additionally, the near agreement of these relationships with the theoretical model supports that there are no other type of PSII fluorescence losses involved, like state transitions or Chl a bleaching. Under lincomycin treatment, 1-qPd began relaxation at lower initial values than with DTT treatment, but its recovery was slower and stagnated at higher levels (Figure 5C). This suggests that some PSII cannot regain capacity for photochemistry following high-light stress when plastid protein translation is inhibited. Overall, lincomycin treatments shows a situation intermediate to control and DTT, where both the XC-NPQ and a slowly reversible loss of PSII photochemical efficiency contribute to the decrease in FV’/FM’ (Figure 6C).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
Overall, analysing both FV’/FM’ and 1-qPd allows to discriminate the influence of XC-NPQ — assumed to behave as a Stern-Volmer process — from that of other processes, including photodamages, on PSII photochemistry during low light recovery. The values of both FV’/FM’ and 1-qPd at 5 and 60 min of low light recovery were averaged to derive a comprehensive PSII inhibition index — ranging from 0 to 1 in all species and treatments combinations — and used in the multivariate analysis.
Protein kinetics; PsbA turnover and Lhcx expression
To determine if some long-lasting NPQ (qI), or loss of PSII photochemistry capacity (qPd<1), could be linked to photodamaged PsbA proteins, we sampled material to quantify PsbA via immunoblots over the high-light stress and low light recovery kinetics (four time points spread between t0 and after 1 h of recovery). Surprisingly, across all species and treatments, only C. gelidus under DTT treatment showed a negative correlation between PsbA/Chl a and time of experiment (P-value = 0.003, significant after Bonferroni correction for 13 relationships tested), with a modest slope leading to a ≈20% relative decrease in PsbA/Chl a at the end of low light recovery (Figure 7). This is in stark contrast with FV’/FM’ and 1-qPd often indicating 50%-to-75% loss of PSII photochemistry compared to pre-stress levels under both DTT and lincomycin treatments. We also attempted to detect increases in Lhcx isoforms accumulations (only for the control treatment) with a promiscuous Lhcx anti-body (FCP6) () originally developed for Cyclotella cryptica (Westermann and Rhiel, 2005). The anti-body worked consistently only for N. frigida, revealing a doubling in total Lhcx, distributed among at least two isoforms, after 60 min of low light recovery (Figure 8).
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 8
Statistical analysis
We added the protein allocation traits (Figure 1) to a list of 16 photoacclimation parameters related to growth, PSII integrity, productivity assessed with 14C-uptake curves and PSII electron transport, and the characteristics of NPQ and the XC, determined in the same species and growth light intensities in previous studies (see (; ) and parameters definition in Supplementary Figure S8). Interspecific differences in photoacclimation were largely explained by two components in a PCA space, explaining 50% and 30% of variance respectively (Figure 9A) (all PCA outputs in Supplementary Data S4). Parameters linked to the maximal rate of C-fixation () were correlated with Rubisco/PsbA, and closely aligned with PC1, showing a clear distinction between N. frigida, T. gravida and C. gelidus on one extreme and F. cylindrus and C. neogracilis on the other. The biological meaning of PC2 was more amalgamated, with the main contributors including FV/FM, maximal ϕNPQ at one pole and the Chl a specific initial slope of C-fixation at the other (αChl, in Figure 9A). The longest distance in PC2 was between T. gravida and C. gelidus (Figure 9A). The Pearson correlation coefficients among these parameters were computed together with the PSII photoinhibition index (averaged FV’/FM’ and qPd at 5 and 60 min of recovery) under each treatment (Figure 9B) and the interspecific significant differences for all parameters are tested with an ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc tests (Supplementary Figure S8). This reveals that the maximal ϕNPQ is positively correlated with reduced PSII inhibition in control treatment (r = 0.63), but this correlation is much stronger in lincomycin treatment (r = 0.95) (Figure 9C). In DTT treatment, the inhibition of the main photoprotective mechanism, XC-NPQ, revealed strong correlations (|r| > 0.7) between PSII inhibition and NPQ/DT, as well as the three protein allocation traits.
FIGURE 9
Discussion
Considering the number of species included, the three treatments used, and the biochemical quantification of proteins and pigments in parallel to PSII fluorescence monitoring, this study represents one of the most comprehensive analyses of Arctic diatoms’ (or any polar microalgae’s) high-light response. Additionally, the five species investigated each occupy a distinct ecological niche over their seasonal succession, allowing us to link light stress tolerance to Arctic diatoms’ unique ecology and with the support of our previous works on these same species (; ). We targeted two key photoprotective mechanisms in diatoms: XC-related NPQ and PSII repair cycle. While confirming a central role for XC-NPQ in coping with high-light stress, our results additionally revealed unexpected patterns, challenging the usual assumption of a single dominant photoprotection mechanism and instead pointing to a more diverse set of strategies across Arctic diatom species succession.
The sympagic N. frigida and the marginal ice-zone planktonic, T. gravida, displayed heightened sensitivity to high-light stress, characterized by longer NPQ relaxation times (Figure 2), and severely compromised PSII photochemistry (Figures 4, 5). However, F. cylindrus, found in ice-covered waters and within sea-ice brine channels, showed strong tolerance to light stress, comparable with the two open water Chaetoceros species under the control treatment. Using specific inhibitors to abolish each photoprotective mechanism in the following treatments, we surprisingly observed that the magnitude of the effect of lincomycin (blocking plastid protein translation and PSII repair) was either comparable to, or more severe than, DTT (blocking XC-NPQ) in four out of the five species (see Supplementary Figure S8). This seriously undermines the prevailing notion that XC-NPQ is the dominant, and often solely considered, photoprotection mechanism at play in polar diatoms. Moreover, the only species which was clearly more affected by XC-NPQ inhibition than by lincomycin was C. gelidus, which is abundant at the end of the Arctic bloom season and in Atlantic influenced waters (; ; ). Interestingly, C. gelidus also tend to dominate at the subsurface Chl a maximum and below, which could promote a strategy reliant upon more nitrogen versus its congeneric C. neogracilis often found at the surface (see below) (). Nevertheless, these observations seem to negate our initial hypothesis that open water planktonic species, which evolved under slightly higher temperatures and tend to be more alike their temperate counterparts (Schiffrine et al., 2020; ), would rely more on PSII repair cycle than do ice-related species (Figure 1A). Even more perplexing, we could not clearly associate impaired PSII photochemistry observed upon lincomycin addition to a decrease in PsbA as observed per immunoblots (Supplementary Figure S6).
Therefore, a parsimonious working model consistent with our dataset must explain, on the one hand, how functional PSII photoinhibition can be so pronounced while the loss of PsbA (assessed via biochemistry) is often small or undetectable, and on the other, why this process is strongly exacerbated when lincomycin inhibits the translation of plastid-encoded proteins. Although counterintuitive at first, there are precedents in earlier findings of fluorometric indicators of PSII functional photoinhibition (sustained NPQ-qI and lower FV’/FM’) not directly correlating with a loss of PsbA in polar taxa (; Petrou et al., 2010). We propose that delayed PsbA degradation (via FtsH), tightly coupled to de novo PsbA synthesis, may serve as an extremophile photoprotection strategy. In this scenario, damaged PSII reaction centres remain connected to the antenna and act as qI-type quenchers, distributing excitation pressure away from active centres (Nawrocki et al., 2021). Degradation of these centres would be delayed until new components are ready for immediate replacement, obscuring changes in PsbA abundance in immunoblots analysis. In this model, even if protein turnover is difficult to detect biochemically, PSII repair remains active, which is consistent with the exacerbated functional PSII inhibition upon lincomycin addition. However, this interpretation challenges previous studies (; Petrou et al., 2010; ) which suggested that cold temperatures kinetically limit the contribution of protein turnover to the high-light response of polar taxa, a point discussed below. Delayed damaged PSII degradation promoting longer qI lifetime may complement the hallmark sustained XC-NPQ of Arctic diatoms (; ) with a second slow-relaxing quenching mechanism originating from a different quencher. The slightly lower FV’/FM’ compared to what 1-qPd predicts in DTT treatment (Figure 6B) are consistent with such qI quenching being at play, whose effect becomes more apparent when XC-NPQ is inhibited.
Notably, even in temperate strains, inactivated PSII reaction centres awaiting recycling can account for up to 60% of the total PSII pool in diatoms (; Li et al., 2016). Another surprising observation was that C. gelidus showed the highest PsbA/Chl a ratio together with the largest functional PSII cross-section (along with F. cylindrus) (Supplementary Figure S8). Chlorophyll a being allocated to more PSII reaction centres should lead to lower σPSII (assuming roughly equal Chl a allocation between PSI and PSII among species), and both parameters were indeed negatively correlated across the four other species (R2 = 0.82) (Supplementary Figure S9). This suggests that C. gelidus may maintain large pool of “spare unassembled” PSII (Levitan et al., 2019) ready to replace damaged ones when needed, a photoprotection strategy also documented in the centric temperate Skeletonema costatum () and an Arctic Micromonas (Ni et al., 2017). In this case, degradation/replacement of inactivated PsbA can occur without needing de novo synthesis, which could explain why we measured a significant decrease in PsbA by immunoblots only in this species (Figure 7). Such a PSII repair strategy would also not be hampered, in the short term, by lincomycin treatment and may explain, in combination to its extremely high maximal ϕNPQ, the relative resistance of this species to this treatment (Supplementary Figure S8).
While the effect of lincomycin is often narrowly interpreted as blocking PsbA turnover, it could also abolish regulatory strategies relying on other plastid-encoded protein synthesis that are crucial in Arctic diatoms’ extreme environment. Before entertaining this hypothesis further, we must ask if the timescale of our experiment, combined with low temperature, kinetically allow for protein translation to be a significant part of the strategy. Although Lhcx proteins are nuclear-encoded, our results confirm that, at least in N. frigida, rapid protein translation in response to high-light stress is possible at 0 °C in an Arctic species (Figure 8). This regulation at the protein level was is fast as in P. tricornutum during a similar high-light stress conducted at 20 °C (). This Lhcx increase suggests that rapid PsbA turnover is at least possible in Arctic diatoms, despite obvious methodological challenges in monitoring it. Also supporting this proposition is the fact that a significant decrease in PsbA was seen only in C. gelidus, the species that showed the lowest FtsH content — which typically correlates with lower proteolytic degradation rates ().
Therefore, it is plausible that lincomycin’s impact reflects not only a direct constraint on the repair of PSII — i.e. reversing net photoinhibition — but also indirect effects that favour the occurrence of photodamage and gross photoinhibition (as assessed by PSII fluorescence). Diatoms’ plastid genome is remarkably conserved and contains relatively few genes, most of which encode subunits of major photosynthetic complexes (PSI and PSII, cytochrome b6f, Rubisco, among others) (Yu et al., 2018). Still, theoretically, the abundance of these complexes, or of specific subunits, might be rapidly adjusted to help cope with high-light stress. Crucially, the two potential bottlenecks to photosynthesis in microalgae, plastoquinol oxidation by the cytochrome b6f (Sukenik et al., 1987) or carboxylation by Rubisco, are reliant on plastid-encoded subunits. Interestingly, if the rate of plastoquinol oxidation can be accelerated via an increase in cytochrome b6f stoichiometry, it could additionally support enhanced capacity for cyclic electron flow (CEF), while strong XC-NPQ favours the oxidation of the plastoquinone pool (). This alternative electron rerouting produces extra ATP which may sustain PSII repair and could relieve electron bottlenecks favouring PSII photodamages and inhibition. In diatoms, the rate of CEF is often considered low under non-stressful conditions, with extra-ATP production offset by alternative electron fluxes towards the mitochondria (), whose operation has recently been reported in an Arctic diatom (Rehder et al., 2025). Yet under stressful conditions, typical of polar environments () or during high-light stress triggering large XC-NPQ (), CEF is likely a crucial component of diatoms’ regulatory toolkit. Likewise, an upregulation of Rubisco concentration is possible, which could increase the C-fixation rate and provide a larger energy sink on PSI acceptor side (see correlation between C-fixation capacities and PSII inhibition indices in Figure 8B). Crucially, polar diatoms compensate for slower catalytic rates at low temperature by accumulating large concentrations of Rubisco (Young et al., 2015), but a dynamic regulation of its abundance to overcome a sudden increase in light has yet to be documented. In all cases, if the inhibition of these putative processes by lincomycin contribute to its surprisingly pronounced impact on PSII photoinhibition, these hypotheses remain consistent with our dataset only when considered together with the delayed degradation of damaged PSII proposed above. We favour this model over alternative slow-relaxing quenching components, such as the qH mechanism described in higher plants (Malnoë, 2018), which we would not expect to be enhanced by lincomycin since its regulators are nuclear-encoded.
Given the lack of clear PsbA degradation patterns across taxa, we turned to a broader statistical approach to scrutinize other key factors potentially influencing Arctic diatoms’ light stress resistance, combining the analysis of protein allocation traits shown in Figure 1 with our previous description of various photoacclimation parameters on the same species panel (; ). A PCA revealed that parameters related to maximal productivity explained the most variance among the five species and strongly correlated with PC1 (Figure 9A, plus all parameters contribution in Supplementary Data S4), for which C. neogracilis and F. cylindrus had values much higher than the three other species. Interestingly, PC1 was correlated with RbcL/PsbA, but also less intuitively, with FtsH/PsbA and lower slopes in the relationship between NPQ and DT. From coefficient correlations comparison (Figure 9B), and in view of the current state-of-knowledge, we propose that in our experimental design, three features favoured species’ PSII tolerance to high-light stress — approximated by the PSII inhibition index computed in Results — when the bulk of photoprotection provided by XC-NPQ was abolished by DTT: i) The maximal rate of carbon fixation, ii) PSII repair cycle capacities (approximated by FtsH/PsbA) and, iii) an overlooked photoprotective role of xanthophylls free in the lipid membrane (), as opposed to those PSII-bound and directly involved in NPQ (; ); with higher free xanthophylls yielding lower NPQ/DT slopes and higher DD + DT pools (Figure 9C). Given the dominant role of XC-NPQ under control and lincomycin treatments, we could not clearly identify strong relationships between the PSII inhibition index and other photoacclimation features.
Nevertheless, these hypotheses remain based on a limited number of species and photoacclimation parameters analysed across our studies. Other important traits, for instance alternative electron flows (; ; Rehder et al., 2025), or ROS production and detoxifying machinery (Schneider et al., 2016), could play differential roles in the high-light stress response among different species. Plus, biovolume, which has been shown to scale with some photophysiological parameters (; ), also aligns particularly well with the high-light response scheme depicted here, especially under control treatment, from 15,000 μm3 in T. gravida to ≈40 μm3 in F. cylindrus and C. neogracilis (Table 1 in ). However, given the limited sample size spanning four orders of magnitude in biovolume, including it as a covariate seemed unadvisable. Finaly, we must consider that the photoacclimation parameters used here represent acclimation to a single growth light intensity and do not reflect the full plasticity range of the species studied. For instance, while F. cylindrus displayed a high light tolerance similar to the open water C. gelidus here, we know from () that its maximal carbon fixation rate and growth rate start to decline at lower growth light levels than C. gelidus. Eventually, achieving a complete depiction of how Arctic diatoms photoprotection capacities align with their seasonal niche, will also entail analysing how other environmental factors influencing physiology interact with light stress tolerance, such as temperature, pCO2 and nutrient availability (Petrou et al., 2011; Schiffrine et al., 2020; ; Rehder et al., 2024).
Conclusion
Our findings confirm the crucial role of XC-NPQ in the high-light stress tolerance of Arctic diatoms, while also challenging the notion of a monolithic photoprotection strategy. We suggest an underappreciated role of xanthophylls not involved in NPQ (; ), and highlight the need to investigate for possible high-light-regulated putative proteins encoded in the plastid genome. As other before us, we failed to capture clear kinetics of PsbA degradation (; Petrou et al., 2010; ). We propose that this reflects delayed proteolysis of damaged PsbA (; Li et al., 2016), such that degradation occurs only when it can be immediately followed by replacement via coupling with de novo synthesis. Overall, we show that high light tolerance among Arctic species aligns reasonably well with their seasonal niche, despite considerable interspecific heterogeneity in traits shaping photoacclimation strategies (Figure 9). Moreover, the marked specialization observed at both extremes of the succession could contribute to the outstanding ecological success of N. frigida and C. gelidus, which regularly dominate sea-ice communities (Poulin et al., 2011) and planktonic spring blooms (; ), respectively. Chaetoceros gelidus displayed uniquely fast XC-NPQ relaxation, favouring rapid return to maximal potential PSII efficiency such as in temperate counterparts (), despite suffering from significant photodamages. This risky strategy may give C. gelidus the edge over competitors when racing for nutrients in bloom conditions. By contrast, the resilience-oriented strategy of N. frigida, characterized by sustained NPQ and the smallest PSII cross-section — making it a smaller photoinhibition target () — likely enhances survival in one of the most hostile environments for photosynthetic life. Global change rapidly disrupting the Arctic ecosystem () could lead to future misalignments between diatom species photoprotection strategies and their transforming niches, shaking up the prevalence of historically dominant taxa in this fragile environment.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
DC: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. SG: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. MS: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review and editing. ND: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. MMA: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review and editing. MB: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. DAC: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. JL: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. We thank the contribution of CNRS in the framework of the IRL 3376 Takuvik, the Canada Excellence Research Chair on Remote sensing of Canada’s new Arctic frontier (MB), NSERC Canada Discovery and Northern Supplement grants (RGPIN-2017-04505) (JL), the Sentinel North program of Université Laval (Canada First Research Excellence Fund) and the research network Québec-Océan for their financial support.
Acknowledgments
We thank F. Bruyant for technical support, V. Richard for her support with HPLC analyses, Prof. A. Juhl and E. Riel for kindly providing us with the N. frigida strain and the FCP6-antibody, respectively.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author JL declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphbi.2025.1745893/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Alou-FontE.MundyC. J.RoyS.GosselinM.AgustíS. (2013). Snow cover affects ice algal pigment composition in the coastal Arctic Ocean during spring. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.474, 89–104. 10.3354/meps10107
2
ArdynaM.ArrigoK. R. (2020). Phytoplankton dynamics in a changing Arctic Ocean. Nat. Clim. Chang.10, 892–903. 10.1038/s41558-020-0905-y
3
BailleulB.BerneN.MurikO.PetroutsosD.PrihodaJ.TanakaA.et al (2015). Energetic coupling between plastids and mitochondria drives CO2 assimilation in diatoms. Nature524, 366–369. 10.1038/nature14599
4
BalzanoS.PercopoI.SianoR.GourvilP.ChanoineM.MarieD.et al (2017). Morphological and genetic diversity of beaufort sea diatoms with high contributions from the Chaetoceros neogracilis species complex. J. Phycol.53, 161–187. 10.1111/jpy.12489
5
BlaisM.ArdynaM.GosselinM.DumontD.BélangerS.TremblayJ. É.et al (2017). Contrasting interannual changes in phytoplankton productivity and community structure in the coastal Canadian Arctic Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr.62, 2480–2497. 10.1002/lno.10581
6
BlommaertL.ChafaiL.BailleulB. (2021). The fine - tuning of NPQ in diatoms relies on the regulation of both xanthophyll cycle enzymes. Sci. Rep.11, 1–17. 10.1038/s41598-021-91483-x
7
BojkoM.Olchawa-PajorM.GossR.Schaller-LaudelS.StrzałkaK.LatowskiD. (2019). Diadinoxanthin de-epoxidation as important factor in the short-term stabilization of diatom photosynthetic membranes exposed to different temperatures. Plant, Cell and Environ.42, 1270–1286. 10.1111/pce.13469
8
BonisteelE. M.TurnerB. E.MurphyC. D.MelansonJ. R.DuffN. M.BeardsallB. D.et al (2018). Strain specific differences in rates of photosystem II repair in picocyanobacteria correlate to differences in FtsH protein levels and isoform expression patterns. PLoS One13, 1–24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0209115
9
BoothB. C.LaroucheP.BélangerS.KleinB.AmielD.MeiZ. P. (2002). Dynamics of Chaetoceros socialis blooms in the north water. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr.49, 5003–5025. 10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00175-3
10
BradburyM.BakerN. R. (1984). A quantitative determination of photochemical and non-photochemical quenching during the slow phase of the chlorophyll fluorescence induction curve of bean leaves. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics765, 275–281. 10.1016/0005-2728(84)90166-x
11
BuckJ. M.KrothP. G.LepetitB. (2021). Identification of sequence motifs in Lhcx proteins that confer qE-based photoprotection in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Plant J.108, 1721–1734. 10.1111/tpj.15539
12
CampbellD. A.TyystjärviE. (2012). Parameterization of photosystem II photoinactivation and repair. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics1817, 258–265. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.04.010
13
CampbellD. A.HossainZ.CockshuttA. M.ZhaxybayevaO.WuH.LiG. (2013). Photosystem II protein clearance and FtsH function in the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Photosynth. Res.115, 43–54. 10.1007/s11120-013-9809-2
14
CroteauD.GuérinS.BruyantF.FerlandJ.CampbellD. A.BabinM.et al (2021). Contrasting nonphotochemical quenching patterns under high light and darkness aligns with light niche occupancy in arctic diatoms. Limnol. Oceanogr.66, S231–S245. 10.1002/lno.11587
15
CroteauD.LacourT.SchiffrineN.MorinP.-I. P.ForgetM.-H. M.BruyantF.et al (2022). Shifts in growth light optima among diatom species support their succession during the spring bloom in the arctic. J. Ecol.110, 1356–1375. 10.1111/1365-2745.13874
16
CroteauD.JensenE.WilhelmC.BailleulB. (2024). Comparing diatom photosynthesis with the green lineage: Electron transport, carbon fixation and metabolism. Diatom Photosynth. Prim. Prod. High-Value Mol, 1–44.
17
CroteauD.JaubertM.FalciatoreA.BailleulB. (2025a). Pennate diatoms make non-photochemical quenching as simple as possible but not simpler. Nat. Commun.16, 2385. 10.1038/s41467-025-57298-4
18
CroteauD.JaubertM.QuemarT.FalciatoreA.MaesA.BailleulB. (2025b). A photoprotection dial maps holistic light-stress response in diatoms. Prepr. bioRxiv. 10.64898/2025.12.11.693581
19
Dall’OstoL.CazzanigaS.HavauxM.BassiR. (2010). Enhanced photoprotection by protein-bound vs free Xanthophyll pools: a comparative analysis of chlorophyll b and Xanthophyll biosynthesis mutants. Mol. Plant3, 576–593. 10.1093/mp/ssp117
20
DegerlundM.EilertsenH. C. (2010). Main species characteristics of Phytoplankton spring blooms in NE Atlantic and arctic waters (68-80° N). Estuaries Coasts33, 242–269. 10.1007/s12237-009-9167-7
21
DuncanR. J.SøreideJ. E.NielsenD. A.VarpeØ.WiktorJ.TobinM. J.et al (2024). Seasonal environmental transitions and metabolic plasticity in a sea-ice alga from an individual cell perspective. Sci. Rep.14, 14984. 10.1038/s41598-024-65273-0
22
FinkelZ. V.IrwinA. J. (2000). Modeling size-dependent photosynthesis: light absorption and the allometric rule. J. Theor. Biol.204, 361–369. 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2020
23
GalindoV.GosselinM.LavaudJ.MundyC. J.ElseB.EhnJ.et al (2017). Pigment composition and photoprotection of arctic sea ice algae during spring. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.585, 49–69. 10.3354/meps12398
24
GilstadM.SakshaugE. (1990). Growth rates of ten diatom species from the Barents Sea at different irradiances and day lengths. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.64, 169–173. 10.3354/meps064169
25
GiossiC. E.KrothP. G.LepetitB. (2025). Xanthophyll cycling and fucoxanthin biosynthesis in the model diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum: recent advances and new gene functions. Front. Photobiol.3, 1–7. 10.3389/fphbi.2025.1680034
26
GoldmanJ. A. L. L.KranzS. A.YoungJ. N.TortellP. D.StanleyR. H. R. R.BenderM. L.et al (2015). Gross and net production during the spring bloom along the Western antarctic peninsula. New Phytol.205, 182–191. 10.1111/nph.13125
27
GossR.JakobT. (2010). Regulation and function of xanthophyll cycle-dependent photoprotection in algae. Photosynth. Res.106, 103–122. 10.1007/s11120-010-9536-x
28
GossR.LepetitB. (2015). Biodiversity of NPQ. J. Plant Physiol.172, 13–32. 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.03.004
29
GuérinS.RaguénèsL.CroteauD.BabinM.LavaudJ. (2022). Potential for the production of carotenoids of interest in the polar diatom Fragilariopsis Cylindrus. Mar. Drugs20, 491. 10.3390/md20080491
30
GuérinS.BruyantF.GosselinM.BabinM.LavaudJ. (2024). Photoperiodic dependent regulation of photosynthesis in the polar diatom Fragilariopsis Cylindrus. Front. Photobiol.2, 1–15. 10.3389/fphbi.2024.1387119
31
HegsethE. N. (1989). Photoadaptation in marine arctic diatoms. Polar Biol.9, 479–486. 10.1007/BF00261029
32
HoppeC. J. M.FuchsN.NotzD.AndersonP.AssmyP.BergeJ.et al (2024). Photosynthetic light requirement near the theoretical minimum detected in arctic microalgae. Nat. Commun.15, 1–10. 10.1038/s41467-024-51636-8
33
JoliN.ConciaL.MocaerK.GutermanJ.LaudeJ.GuerinS.et al (2024). Hypometabolism to survive the long polar night and subsequent successful return to light in the diatom fragilariopsis cylindrus. New Phytol.241, 2193–2208. 10.1111/nph.19387
34
KaleR.HebertA. E.FrankelL. K.SallansL.BrickerT. M.Posp\’\išilP. (2017). Amino acid oxidation of the D1 and D2 proteins by oxygen radicals during photoinhibition of Photosystem II. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.114, 2988–2993. 10.1073/pnas.1618922114
35
KennedyF.MartinA.BowmanJ. P.WilsonR.McMinnA. (2019). Dark metabolism: a molecular insight into how the antarctic sea‐ice diatom Fragilariopsis cylindrus survives long‐term darkness. New Phytol.223, 675–691. 10.1111/nph.15843
36
KeyT.McCarthyA.CampbellD. A.SixC.RoyS.FinkelZ. V. (2010). Cell size trade-offs govern light exploitation strategies in marine phytoplankton. Environ. Microbiol.12, 95–104. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02046.x
37
KropuenskeL. R.MillsM. M.van DijkenG. L.BaileyS.RobinsonD. H.WelschmeyerN. A.et al (2009). Photophysiology in two major Southern Ocean phytoplankton taxa: photoprotection in Phaeocystis antarctica and Fragilariopsis cylindrus. Limnol. Oceanogr.54, 1176–1196. 10.4319/lo.2009.54.4.1176
38
KvernvikA. C.HoppeC. J. M.LawrenzE.PrášilO.GreenacreM.WiktorJ. M.et al (2018). Fast reactivation of photosynthesis in arctic phytoplankton during the polar night. J. Phycol.54, 461–470. 10.1111/jpy.12750
39
KvernvikA. C.RokittaS. D.LeuE.HarmsL.GabrielsenT. M.RostB.et al (2020). Higher sensitivity towards light stress and ocean acidification in an Arctic sea‐ice‐associated diatom compared to a pelagic diatom. New Phytol.226, 1708–1724. 10.1111/nph.16501
40
KvernvikA.HoppeC.GreenacreM.VerbiestS.WiktorJ.GabrielsenT.et al (2021). Arctic sea ice algae differ markedly from phytoplankton in their ecophysiological characteristics. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.666, 31–55. 10.3354/meps13675
41
LacourT.LarivièreJ.FerlandJ.BruyantF.LavaudJ.BabinM. (2018). The role of sustained photoprotective non-photochemical quenching in low temperature and high light acclimation in the bloom-forming arctic Diatom Thalassiosira gravida. Front. Mar. Sci.5, 1–16. 10.3389/fmars.2018.00354
42
LacourT.BabinM.LavaudJ. (2020). Diversity in xanthophyll cycle pigments content and related nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) among microalgae: implications for growth strategy and ecology. J. Phycol.56, 245–263. 10.1111/jpy.12944
43
LafondA.LeblancK.QuéguinerB.MoriceauB.LeynaertA.CornetV.et al (2019). Late spring bloom development of pelagic diatoms in Baffin Bay. Elem. Sci. Anth7, 44. 10.1525/elementa.382
44
LavaudJ.RousseauB.EtienneA. L. (2002). In diatoms, a transthylakoid proton gradient alone is not sufficient to induce a non‐photochemical fluorescence quenching. FEBS letters, 523, 1–3. 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02979-4
45
LavaudJ.StrzepekR. F.KrothP. G. (2007). Photoprotection capacity differs among diatoms: possible consequences on the spatial distribution of diatoms related to fluctuations in the underwater light climate. Limnol. Oceanogr.52, 1188–1194. 10.4319/lo.2007.52.3.1188
46
LavaudJ.SixC.CampbellD. A. (2016). Photosystem II repair in marine diatoms with contrasting photophysiologies. Photosynth. Res.127, 189–199. 10.1007/s11120-015-0172-3
47
LazárD. (2015). Parameters of photosynthetic energy partitioning. J. Plant Physiol.175, 131–147. 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.10.021
48
LepetitB.VolkeD.GilbertM.WilhelmC.GossR. (2010). Evidence for the existence of one antenna-associated, lipid-dissolved and two protein-bound pools of diadinoxanthin cycle pigments in diatoms. Plant Physiol.154, 1905–1920. 10.1104/pp.110.166454
49
LepetitB.SturmS.RogatoA.GruberA.SachseM.FalciatoreA.et al (2013). High light acclimation in the secondary plastids containing diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum is triggered by the redox state of the plastoquinone pool. Plant Physiol.161, 853–865. 10.1104/pp.112.207811
50
LeuE.WiktorJ.SøreideJ. E.BergeJ.Falk-PetersenS. (2010). Increased irradiance reduces food quality of sea ice algae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.411, 49–60. 10.3354/meps08647
51
LeuE.GraeveM.WulffA. (2016). A (too) bright future? Arctic diatoms under radiation stress. Polar Biol.39, 1711–1724. 10.1007/s00300-016-2003-1
52
LevitanO.ChenM.KuangX.CheongK. Y.JiangJ.BanalM.et al (2019). Structural and functional analyses of photosystem II in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.116, 17316–17322. 10.1073/pnas.1906726116
53
LewisK. M.van DijkenG. L.ArrigoK. R. (2020). Changes in phytoplankton concentration now drive increased Arctic Ocean primary production. Sci.369, 198–202. 10.5194/bg-2019-289
54
LiG.CampbellD. A. (2017). Interactive effects of nitrogen and light on growth rates and RUBISCO content of small and large centric diatoms. Photosynth. Res.131, 93–103. 10.1007/s11120-016-0301-7
55
LiG.WorochA. D.DonaherN. A.CockshuttA. M.CampbellD. A. (2016). A hard day’s night: diatoms continue recycling photosystem II in the dark. Front. Mar. Sci.3, 1–10. 10.3389/fmars.2016.00218
56
MalnoëA. (2018). Photoinhibition or photoprotection of photosynthesis? Update on the (newly termed) sustained quenching component qH. Environ. Exp. Bot., 154, 123–133. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.05.005
57
NawrockiW. J.LiuX.RaberB.HuC.De VitryC.BennettD. I. G.et al (2021). Molecular origins of induction and loss of photoinhibition-related energy dissipation. Sci. Adv.7, 1–14. 10.1126/sciadv.abj0055
58
NiG.ZimbalattiG.MurphyC. D.BarnettA. B.ArsenaultC. M.LiG.et al (2017). Arctic Micromonas uses protein pools and non-photochemical quenching to cope with temperature restrictions on Photosystem II protein turnover. Photosynth. Res.131, 203–220. 10.1007/s11120-016-0310-6
59
OwensT. G. (1986). Light-harvesting function in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Plant Physiol.80, 739–746. 10.1104/pp.80.3.739
60
OxboroughK.BakerN. R. (1997). Resolving chlorophyll a fluorescence images of photosynthetic efficiency into photochemical and non-photochemical components - calculation of qP and Fv’/Fm’ without measuring Fo. Photosynth. Res.54, 135–142. 10.1023/A:1005936823310
61
PadfieldD.O’SullivanH.PawarS. (2021). rTPC and nls.multstart: a new pipeline to fit thermal performance curves in r. Methods Ecol. Evol.12, 1138–1143. 10.1111/2041-210X.13585
62
PayneC. M.van DijkenG. L.ArrigoK. R. (2024). Pan-Arctic analysis of the frequency of under-ice and marginal ice zone phytoplankton blooms, 2003–2021. Elem. Sci. Anth12, 00076. 10.1525/elementa.2023.00076
63
PetrouK.HillR.BrownC. M.CampbellD. A.DoblinM. A.RalphP. J. (2010). Rapid photoprotection in sea-ice diatoms from the East Antarctic pack ice. Limnol. Oceanogr.55, 1400–1407. 10.4319/lo.2010.55.3.1400
64
PetrouK.DoblinM. A.RalphP. J. (2011). Heterogeneity in the photoprotective capacity of three Antarctic diatoms during short-term changes in salinity and temperature. Mar. Biol.158 (5), 1029–1041. 10.1007/s00227-011-1628-4
65
Pierella KarlusichJ. J.CosnierK.ZingerL.HenryN.NefC.BernardG.et al (2025). Patterns and drivers of diatom diversity and abundance in the global ocean. Nat. Commun.16, 3452. 10.1038/s41467-025-58027-7
66
PocockT. H.KoziakA.RossoD.FalkS.HünerN. P. A. (2007). Chlamydomonas raudensis (UWO 241), chlorophyceae, exhibits the capacity for rapid D1 repair in response to chronic photoinhibition at low temperature. J. Phycol.43, 924–936. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00380.x
67
PoulinM.DaugbjergN.GradingerR.IlyashL.RatkovaT.von QuillfeldtC. (2011). The pan-Arctic biodiversity of marine pelagic and sea-ice unicellular eukaryotes: a first-attempt assessment. Mar. Biodivers.41, 13–28. 10.1007/s12526-010-0058-8
68
RandelhoffA.SundfjordA.CentreF. (2018). Short commentary on marine productivity at Arctic shelf breaks: upwelling, advection and vertical mixing. 293–300.
69
RasJ.ClaustreH.UitzJ. (2008). Spatial variability of phytoplankton pigment distributions in the Subtropical South Pacific Ocean: comparison between in situ and predicted data. Biogeosciences5, 353–369. 10.5194/bg-5-353-2008
70
RehderL.RokittaS. D.HoppeC. J. M.BuschmannI.JasperL.RostB. (2024). Different temperature sensitivities of key physiological processes lead to divergent trait response patterns in Arctic phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr.69 (8), 1845–1856. 10.1002/lno.12633
71
RehderL.RostB.KranzS. A.RokittaS. D. (2025). Increased light‐enhanced dark respiration under warming suggests intensified metabolic coupling in an Arctic diatom. New Phytol.247, 2499–2506. 10.1111/nph.70359
72
RubanA. V.MurchieE. H. (2012). Assessing the photoprotective effectiveness of non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching: a new approach. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg.1817, 977–982. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.03.026
73
SchiffrineN.TremblayJ.-É.BabinM. (2020). Growth and elemental stoichiometry of the ecologically-relevant arctic diatom Chaetoceros gelidus: a mix of polar and temperate. Front. Mar. Sci.6, 1–15. 10.3389/fmars.2019.00790
74
SchneiderR. J.RoeK. L.HanselC. M.VoelkerB. M. (2016). Species-level variability in extracellular production rates of reactive oxygen species by diatoms. Front. Chem.4, 5. 10.3389/fchem.2016.00005
75
SukenikA.BennettJ.FalkowskiP. (1987). Light-saturated photosynthesis—limitation by electron transport or carbon fixation?Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics891, 205–215. 10.1016/0005-2728(87)90216-7
76
TaoR.NicolausM.KatleinC.AnhausP.HoppmannM.SpreenG.et al (2024). Seasonality of spectral radiative fluxes and optical properties of Arctic sea ice during the spring-summer transition. Elementa12, 1–20. 10.1525/elementa.2023.00130
77
WestermannM.RhielE. (2005). Localisation of fucoxanthin chlorophyll a/c-binding polypeptides of the centric diatom Cyclotella cryptica by immuno-electron microscopy. Protoplasma225, 217–223. 10.1007/s00709-005-0083-9
78
WuH.CockshuttA. M.McCarthyA.CampbellD. A. (2011). Distinctive photosystem II photoinactivation and protein dynamics in marine diatoms. Plant Physiol.156, 2184–2195. 10.1104/pp.111.178772
79
WuH.RoyS.AlamiM.GreenB. R.CampbellD. (2012). Photosystem II photoinactivation, repair, and protection in marine centric diatoms. Plant Physiol.160, 464–476. 10.1104/pp.112.203067
80
YoungJ. N.GoldmanJ. A. L.KranzS. A.TortellP. D.MorelF. M. M. (2015). Slow carboxylation of Rubisco constrains the rate of carbon fixation during Antarctic phytoplankton blooms. New Phytol.205, 172–181. 10.1111/nph.13021
81
YuM.AshworthM. P.HajrahN. H.KhiyamiM. A.SabirM. J.AlhebshiA. M.et al (2018). Evolution of the plastid genomes in diatoms. Adv. Botanical Res., 129–155. 10.1016/bs.abr.2017.11.009
Summary
Keywords
Arctic Ocean, diatoms, lincomycin, nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ), photodamage and PSII repair cycle, photoprotection, seasonal succession, xanthophyll cycle (XC)
Citation
Croteau D, Guérin S, Savoie M, Donaher N, M. Amirian M, Babin M, Campbell DA and Lavaud J (2026) Nonphotochemical quenching and beyond: multi-layered photoprotection shapes light-stress tolerance across seasonal niches in Arctic diatoms. Front. Photobiol. 3:1745893. doi: 10.3389/fphbi.2025.1745893
Received
13 November 2025
Revised
16 December 2025
Accepted
19 December 2025
Published
21 January 2026
Volume
3 - 2025
Edited by
Rajagopal Subramanyam, University of Hyderabad, India
Reviewed by
Milan Szabo, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, Hungary
Ranay Mohan Yadav, University of Hyderabad, India
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Croteau, Guérin, Savoie, Donaher, M. Amirian, Babin, Campbell and Lavaud.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dany Croteau, dany.croteau.3@ulaval.ca
† Present address: Dany Croteau, Institute of Integrative Biology and Systems, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada, Johann Lavaud, UMR6539 LEMAR- Laboratory of Environmental Marine Sciences, CNRS, University Brest, Ifremer, IRD, Institut Européen de la Mer, Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, Plouzané, France
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.