AUTHOR=Tompuri Tuomo T. TITLE=Metabolic equivalents of task are confounded by adiposity, which disturbs objective measurement of physical activity JOURNAL=Frontiers in Physiology VOLUME=6 YEAR=2015 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2015.00226 DOI=10.3389/fphys.2015.00226 ISSN=1664-042X ABSTRACT=

Physical activity refers any bodily movements produced by skeletal muscles that expends energy. Hence the amount and the intensity of physical activity can be assessed by energy expenditure. Metabolic equivalents of task (MET) are multiplies of the resting metabolism reflecting metabolic rate during exercise. The standard MET is defined as 3.5 ml/min/kg. However, the expression of energy expenditure by body weight to normalize the size differences between subjects causes analytical hazards: scaling by body weight does not have a physiological, mathematical, or physical rationale. This review demonstrates by examples that false methodology may cause paradoxical observations if physical activity would be assessed by body weight scaled values such as standard METs. While standard METs are confounded by adiposity, lean mass proportional measures of energy expenditure would enable a more truthful choice to assess physical activity. While physical activity as a behavior and cardiorespiratory fitness or adiposity as a state represents major determinants of public health, specific measurements of health determinants must be understood to enable a truthful evaluation of the interactions and their independent role as a health predictor.