AUTHOR=Wang Hongju , Wang Lu , Sun Nannan , Yao Yang , Hao Liling , Xu Lisheng , Greenwald Stephen E. 

TITLE=Quantitative Comparison of the Performance of Piezoresistive, Piezoelectric, Acceleration, and Optical Pulse Wave Sensors

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Physiology

VOLUME=Volume 10 - 2019

YEAR=2020

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2019.01563

DOI=10.3389/fphys.2019.01563

ISSN=1664-042X

ABSTRACT=The accurate measurement of the arterial pulse wave is beneficial to clinical health assessment and is important for the effective diagnosis of many types of cardiovascular disease. A variety of sensors have been developed for the non-invasive detection of these waves, but the type of sensor has an impact on the measurement results. Therefore, it is necessary to compare and analyze the signals obtained under a range of conditions using various pulse sensors to aid in making an informed choice of the appropriate type. From the available types we have selected four: a piezoresistive strain gauge sensor (PESG) and a piezoelectric Millar tonometer (the former with the ability to measure contact force), a circular film acceleration sensor and an optical reflection sensor. Pulse wave signals were recorded from the left radial, carotid, femoral and digital arteries of 60 subjects using these four sensors. Their performance was evaluated by analyzing their susceptibilities to external factors (contact force, measuring site and ambient light intensity) and by comparing their stability and reproducibility. Under medium contact force, the peak-to-peak amplitude of the signals was higher than that at high and low force levels and the variability of signal waveform was small. The optical sensor was susceptible to ambient light. Analysis of the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of the pulse wave parameters, showed that: the tonometer and accelerometer had good stability (ICC>0.80), the PESG and optical sensor had moderate stability (0.46<ICC<0.86). Intra-observer analysis showed that the tonometer and accelerometer had good reproducibility (ICC>0.75) and the PESG and optical sensor had moderate reproducibility (0.42<ICC<0.91). Inter-observer analysis demonstrated that the accelerometer had good reproducibility (ICC>0.85) and the three other sensors had moderate reproducibility (0.52<ICC<0.96). We conclude that the type of sensor and measurement site affect pulse wave characteristics and the careful selection of appropriate sensor and measurement site are required according to the research and clinical need. Moreover, the influence of external factors such as contact pressure and ambient light should be fully taken into account.