Front. Physiol. Frontiers in Physiology Front. Physiol. 1664-042X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fphys.2021.839872 Physiology Retraction Retraction: Bactericidal/Permeability-Increasing Protein Improves Cognitive Impairment in Diabetic Mice via Blockade of the LPS-LBP-TLR4 Signaling Pathway Frontiers Editorial Office *

Approved by: Geoffrey A. Head, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Australia

 *Correspondence: Frontiers Editorial Office editorial.office@frontiersin.org

This article was submitted to Integrative Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology

 28 12 2021 2021 12 839872 20 12 2021 20 12 2021 Copyright © 2021 Frontiers Editorial Office. 2021 Frontiers Editorial Office

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Retraction of the Original Research Article Bactericidal/Permeability-Increasing Protein Improves Cognitive Impairment in Diabetic Mice via Blockade of the LPS-LBP-TLR4 Signaling Pathway by Sun, Q., Li, T., Li, Y., Wei, L., Zhang, M., and Deng, S. (2021). Front. Physiol. 11:718. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00718

The journal and Chief Editors retract the 11 February 2021 article cited above.

Following publication, concerns were raised regarding the validity of the data in the article. The authors failed to provide the raw data or a satisfactory explanation during the investigation, which was conducted in accordance with Frontiers' policies. Given the concerns, and the lack of raw data, the editors no longer have confidence in the findings presented in the article.

This retraction was approved by the Chief Editors of Frontiers in Physiology and the Chief Executive Editor of Frontiers. The authors agreed with this retraction.