<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Physiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Physiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Physiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-042X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1330157</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphys.2024.1330157</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Physiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Strain-controlled electrophysiological wave propagation alters <italic>in silico</italic> scar-based substrate for ventricular tachycardia</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Willems et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1330157">10.3389/fphys.2024.1330157</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Willems</surname>
<given-names>Evianne</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2119400/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Janssens</surname>
<given-names>Koen L. P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dekker</surname>
<given-names>Lukas R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/9466/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van de Vosse</surname>
<given-names>Frans N.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1960174/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cluitmans</surname>
<given-names>Matthijs J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/565304/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bovendeerd</surname>
<given-names>Peter H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/32987/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Biomedical Engineering</institution>, <institution>Eindhoven University of Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Eindhoven</addr-line>, <country>Netherlands</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Cardiology</institution>, <institution>Catharina Hospital</institution>, <addr-line>Eindhoven</addr-line>, <country>Netherlands</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Maastricht University Medical Center</institution>, <addr-line>Maastricht</addr-line>, <country>Netherlands</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Philips Research Eindhoven</institution>, <addr-line>Eindhoven</addr-line>, <country>Netherlands</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/385055/overview">Michele Orini</ext-link>, University College London, United Kingdom</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/27099/overview">Joakim Sundnes</ext-link>, Simula Research Laboratory, Norway</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/76746/overview">Oleg Aslanidi</ext-link>, King&#x2019;s College London, United Kingdom</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Evianne Willems, <email>e.kruithof@tue.nl</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>09</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1330157</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>30</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>21</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Willems, Janssens, Dekker, van de Vosse, Cluitmans and Bovendeerd.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Willems, Janssens, Dekker, van de Vosse, Cluitmans and Bovendeerd</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>
<bold>Introduction:</bold> Assessing a patient&#x2019;s risk of scar-based ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction is a challenging task. It can take months to years after infarction for VT to occur. Also, if selected for ablation therapy, success rates are low.</p>
<p>
<bold>Methods:</bold> Computational ventricular models have been presented previously to support VT risk assessment and to provide ablation guidance. In this study, an extension to such virtual-heart models is proposed to phenomenologically incorporate tissue remodeling driven by mechanical load. Strain amplitudes in the heart muscle are obtained from simulations of mechanics and are used to adjust the electrical conductivity. </p>
<p>
<bold>Results:</bold> The mechanics-driven adaptation of electrophysiology resulted in a more heterogeneous distribution of propagation velocities than that of standard models, which adapt electrophysiology in the structural substrate from medical images only. Moreover, conduction slowing was not only present in such a structural substrate, but extended in the adjacent functional border zone with impaired mechanics. This enlarged the volumes with high repolarization time gradients (&#x2265;10&#xa0;ms/mm). However, maximum gradient values were not significantly affected. The enlarged volumes were localized along the structural substrate border, which lengthened the line of conduction block. The prolonged reentry pathways together with conduction slowing in functional regions increased VT cycle time, such that VT was easier to induce, and the number of recommended ablation sites increased from 3 to 5 locations.</p>
<p>
<bold>Discussion:</bold> Sensitivity testing showed an accurate model of strain-dependency to be critical for low ranges of conductivity. The model extension with mechanics-driven tissue remodeling is a potential approach to capture the evolution of the functional substrate and may offer insight into the progression of VT risk over time.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>myocardial infarction</kwd>
<kwd>functional border zone</kwd>
<kwd>longitudinal tissue remodeling</kwd>
<kwd>mechanics-driven conduction velocity</kwd>
<kwd>long-term risk evolution</kwd>
<kwd>phenomenological model</kwd>
<kwd>strain amplitudes</kwd>
<kwd>virtual-heart simulations</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Cardiac Electrophysiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Survivors of myocardial infarction have an increased risk of scar-based ventricular tachycardia (VT) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Solomon et al., 2005</xref>). VT is an abnormal heart rhythm, where the ventricles beat too fast and lose their pump function. Such arrhythmias can evolve in the months to years after infarction. Clinical markers, such as the left ventricle (LV) ejection fraction, are frequently insufficient to predict a patient&#x2019;s risk for VT, and the relationship between scar, electrophysiology, and tissue remodeling over time is poorly understood. Consequently, discrimination of post myocardial infarct patients into groups of high and low VT risk can be difficult in the clinic, which results in redundant placement of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Moreover, for patients selected for invasive treatment, ablation success rates are low.</p>
<p>In literature, a computational heart model is presented to detect patients at risk of VT after myocardial infarction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Arevalo et al., 2016</xref>). To assess this risk, personalized simulations of the cardiac electrophysiology are performed, where the infarct area is differentiated from remote tissue in terms of ion channel properties and transverse conduction velocity (CV<sub>T</sub>). In a subsequent study, the model was used as tool to guide invasive treatment by targeting ablation locations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Prakosa et al., 2018</xref>). This promising approach to predict VT risk and to provide ablation guidance, is optimized to perform accurate electrophysiological simulations of the heart. However, the evolution of VT risk over time is typically not included in this approach.</p>
<p>It is known that the geometry and material properties of an infarct evolve over time. Machine learning can help to include infarct substrate evolution in computational risk predictions, and it is suggested to repeat model-based risk assessment at follow ups in the clinic to account for remodeling in the diseased area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Shade et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Popescu et al., 2022</xref>). Still, to our knowledge, there are no genuine longitudinal modeling studies of post-infarct VT performed. Ongoing remodeling can be caused by mechanical load, but in turn also locally alters mechanical load. The effects of mechanics-induced electrophysiological remodeling may play an essential role in explaining the evolution of VT risk over the long timeframe (months to many years) in which post-infarct VTs typically occur. Within this study, we want to explore whether and how changes in mechanical load can alter electrophysiological characteristics and VT risk with it. We focus on mechanical load-induced remodeling of CV<sub>T</sub>, which can be a substrate for VT.</p>
<p>In multiple experiments, a relation between strain and conduction velocity (CV) is shown, from which an overview is given in the review of Jacot et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jacot et al., 2010</xref>). Notably, in a series of studies, an increase in CV was observed for higher strain amplitudes in pulsatile stretch experiments with myocyte cultures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zhuang et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shyu et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Pimentel et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Shanker et al., 2005</xref>). The CV remained elevated up to hours after the stretching procedure was stopped, which shows the lasting nature of those effects. We assume this permanent effect to be caused by the stain-induced increase in connexin-43, which was observed when strain recured often enough. This is of interest as we noted that connexin expression is linked to slow conduction and VT susceptibility in the healed BZ (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Greener et al., 2012</xref>). In support of the assumption, a canine study demonstrated that both connexin density and CV in transmural direction increase over the wall depth, with highest values in the last 60% toward the endocardium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Poelzing et al., 2004</xref>). This matches with distributions of myofiber-strain, which are highest in endocardial regions as well (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bogaert and Rademakers, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ashikaga et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ashikaga et al., 2009</xref>), further substantiating the idea that repetitive strain, or the lack of it, might affect connexin and CV. The transmural direction in which the CV was measured is perpendicular to the myofiber orientation, and we assume that strain can therefore be linked to CV<sub>T</sub>, which is altered in conventional models as well to reflect the effect of infarction.</p>
<p>Our hypothesis is that a link between recurring fiber-strain amplitudes and CV<sub>T</sub> can be of importance to the development of substrate-based VT, as fiber-strains during the cardiac cycle are affected by stiff fibrosis. We expect that via strain amplitudes, the presence of the infarct affects CV<sub>T</sub> not only in the infarct core and border zone (BZ), as implemented in conventional heart models, but also in remote tissue parts where mechanics is impaired due to the adjacent structural infarction. Therefore, in this study, we propose a phenomenological model of the relation between fiber-strain amplitude and CV<sub>T</sub>. To test our hypothesis, the phenomenological model proposed is implemented in an existing pipeline (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The effects of our hypothesis on electrophysiology simulation outcomes are analyzed in terms of CV<sub>T</sub> distributions, repolarization time gradients, and virtual stress test results. Finally, the sensitivity of repolarization time gradients to the definition of the strain-CV<sub>T</sub> relation is explored as well.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Overview of a virtual-heart model to simulate VT. In the current methods (black), the effect of the structural infarct area is taken into account by altering ion channel properties, which affect the action potential duration, and by reducing CV<sub>T</sub>. In this paper, an extension (red) is proposed to include strain-induced remodeling of CV<sub>T</sub> as well, which is important for VT risk evolvement over time. Finally, for both models with and without extension, a virtual stress test is performed in an attempt to induce VT.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-15-1330157-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Model geometry</title>
<p>The simulations are performed on a truncated ellipsoidal geometry with a rule-based myofiber field, which represents an idealized LV (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bovendeerd et al., 2009</xref>). The wall and cavity volumes are set to 136 and 44&#xa0;mL. In the ellipsoid, two infarct geometries are considered, where the infarct core extends from 14% to 51% of the ventricle height (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). A 100%-transmural core enclosed by a 9&#xa0;mm thick BZ is implemented to ensure the induction of VTs, as it is known that larger BZs give higher risk for VT. Secondly, an endocardial 67%-transmural core with a 9&#xa0;mm thick BZ is implemented to investigate whether the extension has the same effect for a non-transmural infarct. The total infarct volumes, including core and BZ, are 15&#xa0;mL and 11&#xa0;mL respectively.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Visualization of infarct and BZ in a short axis cross section at &#xbc; height of the LV, and in a long axis epicardial view. In shades of red, the distribution of different myocardial layers is visualized, as given in subfigure <bold>(B)</bold> In gray, two different combinations of infarct core and structural BZ geometries are schematically depicted, where the latter is a mixture of fibrotic and healthy tissue. The total infarct volume % of the LV is given for both situations. <bold>(B)</bold> For each myocardial layer, a different intrinsic APD is modeled by altering the Gks conductivities to mimic manifested APD measurements as presented by Poelzing et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Poelzing and Rosenbaum, 2004</xref>). <bold>(C)</bold> Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2_4">2.4</xref> (red) describes the phenomenological relation between fiber-strain amplitudes <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and CV<sub>T</sub> when <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">act</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is set to 1. Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2_4">2.4</xref> is fitted to a linear regression line through the combined data sets of subfigure D (gray). The meaning of the parameters is visualized in the figure, and corresponding values are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. <bold>(D)</bold> Experimental CV<sub>T</sub> measurements as obtained from Poelzing et al. (red) ((<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Poelzing et al., 2004</xref>) and simulated strain amplitudes <inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (black) over LV wall. <bold>(E)</bold> Visualization of six pacing sites at the endocardium. <bold>(F)</bold> Difference in mesh resolution for the mechanical (3&#xa0;mm) and electrophysiological (500&#xa0;&#x3bc;m) simulations.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-15-1330157-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Model of cardiac mechanics</title>
<p>The model of Janssens et al. is applied to simulate the mechanical behavior of a chronic infarct ventricle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bovendeerd et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Janssens et al., 2023</xref>). The material model and parameter values are copied from this study as well. A brief summary of their methods will be given in this section.</p>
<p>The myocardium is modeled as a non-linear, transversely isotropic, nearly-incompressible material. The Cauchy stress tensor is given by<disp-formula id="e2_1">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x21c0;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x21c0;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2.1)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>This tensor is composed from two parts to account for both passive, <inline-formula id="inf4">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and contractile active, <inline-formula id="inf5">
<mml:math id="m6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, myocardial stresses. <inline-formula id="inf6">
<mml:math id="m7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> depends on the time <inline-formula id="inf7">
<mml:math id="m8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> elapsed since cardiac activation, and on the length <inline-formula id="inf8">
<mml:math id="m9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> of the contractile element. This active component is only present in parallel with the myofiber orientation <inline-formula id="inf9">
<mml:math id="m10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x21c0;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. To simulate a chronic infarct, the passive stress <inline-formula id="inf10">
<mml:math id="m11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is increased by changing the multiplication factor <inline-formula id="inf11">
<mml:math id="m12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> from 1 to 10 in the infarct core to represent stiff fibrosis. Furthermore, the active component is eliminated by setting the multiplication factor <inline-formula id="inf12">
<mml:math id="m13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> to 0 to represent the loss of contractile myocytes in this area. To simulate the structural BZ, which is a mixture of infarct and healthy tissue, both <inline-formula id="inf13">
<mml:math id="m14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf14">
<mml:math id="m15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> values are linearly interpolated from the infarct core to the surrounding healthy tissue, where they are set to 1. The infarct size and geometry differ from those in Janssens et al., and are described in Sec. 2.1.</p>
<p>The ventricle is coupled to a 0D closed-loop lumped parameter model, which represents the circulatory system. Finally, the equation of conservation of momentum is solved:<disp-formula id="e2_2">
<mml:math id="m16">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2207;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mo>&#x2219;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2192;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2.2)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Rigid body motion is suppressed by restricting the in-plane solution of basal nodes to its nullspace, which suppresses the average rotation about the long axis as well, and by constraining the base in the out-of-plane direction. The endocardial surface is subject to a uniform pressure. During isovolumetric contraction and relaxation, this pressure is determined such that mechanical equilibrium is obtained at a constant LV volume. The pressure during filling and ejection is computed from the interaction with the circulatory system. The simulated cardiac cycle is initiated by homogeneous activation of the myocardium. Strains are computed by using the LV geometry at t &#x3d; 0 as reference, and fiber-strain amplitudes are defined as the difference between the local maximum and minimum logarithmic fiber-strain as experienced during the computed cardiac cycle.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Model of cardiac electrophysiology</title>
<sec id="s2-3-1">
<title>2.3.1 Reference model</title>
<p>Following the electrophysiology methods of Arevalo et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Arevalo et al., 2016</xref>), the monodomain equation is used which models cardiac tissue as excitable medium, with diffusion and local excitation of membrane voltage:<disp-formula id="e2_3">
<mml:math id="m17">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2202;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2202;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">w</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2207;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2219;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2207;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2.3)</label>
</disp-formula>
<inline-formula id="inf15">
<mml:math id="m18">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the conductivity tensor describing the effective voltage diffusion through the tissue, <inline-formula id="inf16">
<mml:math id="m19">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> the membrane voltage which is solved for, <inline-formula id="inf17">
<mml:math id="m20">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> the membrane surface area-to-volume ratio, <inline-formula id="inf18">
<mml:math id="m21">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> the membrane capacitance, <inline-formula id="inf19">
<mml:math id="m22">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> the ionic model which describes the total transmembrane current, <inline-formula id="inf20">
<mml:math id="m23">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">w</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> the ionic variables, and <inline-formula id="inf21">
<mml:math id="m24">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is an external stimulus current which can be applied. A zero transmembrane potential flux is imposed on the domain boundary, assuming there is no current flowing into or out of the domain. In this study, <inline-formula id="inf22">
<mml:math id="m25">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is set to 0.14&#xa0;&#x3bc;m<sup>-1</sup>, <inline-formula id="inf23">
<mml:math id="m26">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> to 1&#xa0;&#x3bc;F/cm<sup>2</sup>, and <inline-formula id="inf24">
<mml:math id="m27">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> to 40&#xa0;&#x3bc;A/cm<sup>2</sup> during the delivery of stimuli.</p>
<p>For <inline-formula id="inf25">
<mml:math id="m28">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, the Ten Tusscher ionic model for human ventricular myocytes is used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ten Tusscher and Panfilov, 2006</xref>). The structural BZ is simulated by altering peak conductivities which are kept constant over the whole BZ: for the sodium current (&#x2212;62%), L-type calcium current (&#x2212;69%), and potassium currents Gkr (&#x2212;70%) and Gks (&#x2212;80%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Arevalo et al., 2016</xref>). This causes an elongation in action potential duration (APD), decreased upstroke velocity and decreased peak amplitude compared to the healthy modeled myocytes. In contrast to the model of Arevalo et al., an intrinsic transmural gradient in APDs is implemented in the remote tissue by altering the peak Gks potassium current in the endocardium (&#x2b;110%), sub-endocardium (&#x2212;5%), midlayer (&#x2b;30%), and epicardium (&#x2b;145%), yielding intrinsic APDs of 242, 294, 274, and 232&#xa0;ms respectively when paced with a basic cycle length of 600&#xa0;ms in single cell simulations. In tissue simulations, this manifests APDs that gradually increase from 238&#xa0;ms at the epicardium to 282&#xa0;ms at the endocardium (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>), which is in agreement with measurements of canine APDs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Poelzing and Rosenbaum, 2004</xref>). The gradual increase and maximum difference of 44&#xa0;ms corresponds with measurements in healthy areas of human hearts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Boukens et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Srinivasan et al., 2019</xref>). Those manifested (tissue) APDs differ from the intrinsic (isolated cell) APDs due to cell-to-cell communication, also called the electrotonic coupling of cells. The thicknesses of the 4 transmural layers are based upon methods in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Franzone et al., 2006</xref>). Those layers and the APD distributions are visualized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>.</p>
<p>To simulate electrical pulse propagation, the along-fiber conductivity value for <inline-formula id="inf26">
<mml:math id="m29">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is determined to match a CV along the myofibers of 0.6&#xa0;m/s in remote and BZ tissue. The conductivity is set to 0 in all directions in the infarct core. In the reference model, the methods of Arevalo et al. are followed further by setting CV<sub>T</sub> (thus in sheet and normal direction) to 0.3&#xa0;m/s in remote tissue. In the structural BZ, CV<sub>T</sub> is set to 0.08&#xa0;m/s and kept constant to represent the effect of a 90% decrease in transverse conductivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Arevalo et al., 2016</xref>). In our extended model, the implementation of CV<sub>T</sub> deviates from that of Arevalo et al., as explained in the next section.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3-2">
<title>2.3.2 Extended model</title>
<p>In our new model, we introduce two adjustments to the reference model such that CV<sub>T</sub> is dependent on both an effect of the structural BZ, and of myofiber strain amplitude. Therefore, CV<sub>T</sub> is determined by<disp-formula id="e2_4">
<mml:math id="m30">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2.4)</label>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf27">
<mml:math id="m31">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> represents the transverse velocity of 0.3&#xa0;m/s in the reference model when no effects of scar or strain are taken into account. The first adjustment is that the effect of the structural BZ is not kept constant, but CV<sub>T</sub> depends on fibrotic density as myofibers can be separated by fibrotic tissue. Through <inline-formula id="inf28">
<mml:math id="m32">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as introduced in Sec. 2.2, CV<sub>T</sub> decreases from its reference value to eventually zero in the infarct core where fibrotic density is highest. The second adjustment is that CV<sub>T</sub> is affected by a newly proposed phenomenological relation between fiber-strain amplitudes <inline-formula id="inf29">
<mml:math id="m33">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and CV<sub>T</sub>:<disp-formula id="e2_5">
<mml:math id="m34">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x25b;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>tanh</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x25b;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x25b;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2.5)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>This is a sigmoidal relation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>) where the CV<sub>T</sub> boundaries are set within a physiological range for surviving myocardial tissue. These boundaries are controlled by the allowed variability, <inline-formula id="inf30">
<mml:math id="m35">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, around the basic velocity <inline-formula id="inf31">
<mml:math id="m36">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, which is chosen such that the minimum velocity matches the minimum in the reference model of 0.08&#xa0;m/s. The function will return 1 if the local strain amplitude equals <inline-formula id="inf32">
<mml:math id="m37">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, which will result in a CV<sub>T</sub> of <inline-formula id="inf33">
<mml:math id="m38">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (0.3&#xa0;m/s) when using Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2_4">2.4</xref>. The steepness <inline-formula id="inf34">
<mml:math id="m39">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and shift <inline-formula id="inf35">
<mml:math id="m40">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> of the relation are chosen to match CV<sub>T</sub> sensitivity to strain. Their values are determined from combining a canine CV<sub>T</sub> dataset from literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Poelzing et al., 2004</xref>) with strain amplitudes <inline-formula id="inf36">
<mml:math id="m41">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> obtained from a simulation of healthy LV mechanics (Sec. 2.2). <inline-formula id="inf37">
<mml:math id="m42">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and CV<sub>T</sub> are both transmurally sampled in a 2&#xa0;cm thick slice at the equator of the LV and increase over the wall depth from epi-to endocardium (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2D</xref>). This positive correlation (r<sup>2</sup> &#x3d; 0.952) is reflected in a positive slope in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2_5">(2.5)</xref> through <inline-formula id="inf38">
<mml:math id="m43">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. All parameter values are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. For both the reference and extended model CV<sub>T</sub> is zero in the infarct core, but for the extended model, CV<sub>T</sub> is expected to be more heterogeneous and to extend beyond the structural BZ into the functional BZ with impaired mechanics, which cannot be detected from contrast enhanced images. To determine CV<sub>T</sub> values in the electrophysiology model, a weak coupling between the models of mechanics and electrophysiology is established. This is done by obtaining strain amplitudes <inline-formula id="inf39">
<mml:math id="m44">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and infarct density <inline-formula id="inf40">
<mml:math id="m45">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> from the model of mechanics, which are then used in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2_4">2.4</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Parameter values in Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2_4">2.4</xref> and Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2_5">2.5</xref> to describe the relation between fiber-strain amplitude and CV<sub>T</sub>, visualized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf41">
<mml:math id="m46">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> [m/s]</td>
<td align="left">0.30</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>Basic velocity</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf42">
<mml:math id="m47">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> [m/s]</td>
<td align="left">0.44</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>CV</italic>
<sub>
<italic>T</italic>
</sub> <italic>variability</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf43">
<mml:math id="m48">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> [-]</td>
<td align="left">20.6</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>Sensitivity constant</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf44">
<mml:math id="m49">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> [-]</td>
<td align="left">0.1665</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>Strain amplitude resulting in</italic> <inline-formula id="inf45">
<mml:math id="m50">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3-3">
<title>2.3.3 Virtual stress test</title>
<p>To evaluate VT risk, a virtual stress test is performed. In such a test, electrical stimuli are applied at six different sites, A through F, around the BZ at the endocardium (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2E</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kruithof et al., 2021</xref>). First, the Ten Tusscher cell model was stimulated 500 times prior to tissue simulations to reach steady-state. The resulting states of gating variables are given as input for the tissue simulations. For these tissue simulations, at each defined site, six stimuli (S1) with a cycle length of 600&#xa0;ms are applied, followed by a premature stimulus (S2). To explore the vulnerable window in which VTs can be induced, a range in S2 timings with 5&#xa0;ms increments from earliest electrical capture to 15&#xa0;ms after the latest induced VT is simulated, resulting in a range from 320 to 370&#xa0;ms. Each stimulus has a duration of 2&#xa0;ms, an amplitude of 40&#xa0;&#x3bc;A/cm<sup>2</sup> and is applied to a tissue area with a diameter of 3&#xa0;mm.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Numerical implementation</title>
<p>Unstructured finite-element tetrahedral meshes are generated with an average resolution of 3&#xa0;mm and 500&#xa0;&#x3bc;m for the mechanics and electrophysiology model respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2F</xref>). Mechanics simulations are performed in FEniCS with timesteps of 2&#xa0;ms (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://fenicsproject.org/">fenicsproject.org</ext-link>). The displacement field is represented by quadratic Lagrangian basis functions, corresponding to a system of 106,852 degrees of freedom. Electrophysiology simulations are performed in the CARP framework with timesteps of 20&#xa0;&#x3bc;s&#xa0;(<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.opencarp.org/">opencarp.org</ext-link>). The membrane voltage potential is approximated by linear Lagrangian basis functions, corresponding to 108,2784 degrees of freedom. To incorporate mechanical results into the electrophysiology simulation, fiber-strain amplitudes are linearly interpolated from the lower resolution mechanics mesh to the higher resolution electrophysiology mesh. From these interpolated strain-amplitudes, CV<sub>T</sub> values are obtained through Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2_4">2.4</xref> and discretized in 9 levels from which the center values are imposed to the extended electrophysiology model using the methods of Costa et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Costa et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>2.5 Experiments performed</title>
<p>The effect of strain-induced CV<sub>T</sub> remodeling on the electrophysiological simulation outcomes is explored for the two infarct cases as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>. For each case, one mechanics cardiac cycle was simulated. Fiber-strain amplitudes from these simulations were used in the extended model to modify the distribution of CV<sub>T</sub>. Virtual stress test simulations from Sec. 2.2.3 are performed for both the reference and extended model to assess the effect of strain-dependent CV<sub>T</sub>.</p>
<p>To investigate the sensitivity of the results to the parameter settings of the novel strain amplitude-CV<sub>T</sub> relation, the values of <inline-formula id="inf46">
<mml:math id="m51">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (steepness) and <inline-formula id="inf47">
<mml:math id="m52">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (shift) were varied with respect to the baseline values as presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> &#x3b1; was set to 50%, 70%, 100%, 150% and 250% compared to the default value. <inline-formula id="inf48">
<mml:math id="m53">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> was set to 122%, 111%, 100%, 89%, and 78%. This results in even distributions of strain amplitude-CV<sub>T</sub> curves as shown in the top row of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>, which are applied to the transmural infarct case. For datasets with overall higher measured strains (large <inline-formula id="inf49">
<mml:math id="m54">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), typically a lower sensitivity to variations in strain (small <inline-formula id="inf50">
<mml:math id="m55">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) is expected. Therefore, when both parameters are varied, only smaller values for <inline-formula id="inf51">
<mml:math id="m56">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are considered for larger values in <inline-formula id="inf52">
<mml:math id="m57">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6">
<title>2.6 Evaluation methods</title>
<p>The simulation results are analyzed in terms of the spatial repolarization time gradients (RTG) map. This map is created for the last S1 stimulus in the simulation, where repolarization time is defined as the moment at which the membrane voltage repolarized to &#x2212;70&#xa0;mV. From these RTG maps, <italic>RTG</italic>
<sub>
<italic>vol</italic>
</sub> and <italic>RTG</italic>
<sub>
<italic>mean</italic>
</sub> metrics are extracted where RTG<sub>vol</sub> [ml] represents the tissue volume with gradients &#x2265;10&#xa0;ms/mm, which are critical for conduction block (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Restivo et al., 1990</xref>). RTG<sub>mean</sub> [ms/mm] indicates the mean RTG value within this volume with RTGs above 10&#xa0;ms/mm. These metrics are computed for all performed experiments, such that the effects of mechanical feedback and parameter variability on RTG can be explored. The RTG metrics during baseline rhythm are an indication for VT risk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Cluitmans et al., 2021</xref>), and only require S1 stimuli. For the sensitivity test, these metrics are computed for one pacing site only (site A in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2E</xref>) to save computational costs.</p>
<p>For the virtual stress test simulations, all six pacing sites are used and S2 stimuli are applied as well. The results are captured in <italic>vulnerable windows</italic>. These windows define for each pacing site and S1-S2 interval whether VT was induced or not. Here, VT is defined as electrical activity sustained for at least 800&#xa0;ms after S2. In case of occurrence of VT, exit points are defined as the location with earliest second activation time, counted from the start of S2 sustained for at least 800&#xa0;ms after S2. In case of occurrence of VT, exit points are defined as the location with earliest second activation time, counted from the start of S2.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Mechanics</title>
<sec id="s3-1-1">
<title>3.1.1 Stroke volumes and ejection fractions</title>
<p>For the simulations of cardiac mechanics, PV-loops are created to capture the global function of the healthy and infarcted ventricles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). Stroke volume and ejection fraction for the healthy case are 68&#xa0;mL and 61% respectively. For the transmural and non-transmural infarcts, this reduced to 57&#xa0;mL and 55%, and 58&#xa0;mL and 56% respectively.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Left: PV-loops as simulated for the healthy LV and the implemented infarcts. Right: myofiber-strain traces during the cardiac cycle where the filling, isovolumetric contraction, ejection, and isovolumetric relaxation phases are indicated with vertical lines. Next to it, spatial distributions of strain amplitudes are given for the infarct cases with an epicardial (top row) and a cross-section view (second row) in which the structural infarct core and border zone are indicated with black lines.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-15-1330157-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-1-2">
<title>3.1.2 Fiber-strain traces and amplitudes</title>
<p>Epicardial fiber-strain traces over time for a healthy case, at the infarct core, the outer BZ, and remote close to the BZ are given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref> (right-side). For the healthy case, myofiber strain rises during filling and decreases during the ejection phase. At the infarct core (location 1), the fiber-strain shows less increase during filling due to the increased passive stiffness in this area. However, the lack of contractility in this area results in tissue bulging (stretch) during ejection, increasing the fiber-strain during this phase. Therefore, strain amplitudes are still high in the infarct core. For the outer structural BZ (location 2 and 2&#x2032;), strain during filling is reduced as well as this region is adjacent to the stiff core. Bulging during ejection is less compared to that in the infarct core as active contractile function is mostly retained in the outer BZ, resulting in low amplitudes in and around this region. Finally, in remote tissue close to the BZ (location 3 and 3&#x2019;), strain traces become more similar to those of the healthy case. Asymmetry in strain results left and right to the infarct is induced by different fiber orientations in those regions relative to the infarct. Overall, strain amplitude is lower at the epicardium compared to the endocardium, in the structural BZ of the infarct, and in parts of remote tissue closely located to the structural BZ.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-1-3">
<title>3.1.3 Left ventricular CV<sub>T</sub> distributions</title>
<p>From the distributions of strain amplitude (<inline-formula id="inf58">
<mml:math id="m63">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and scar density (<inline-formula id="inf59">
<mml:math id="m64">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, the LV distributions of CV<sub>T</sub> are created (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2_4">2.4</xref>) for the healthy and two infarct cases. A wider distribution of CV<sub>T</sub> values is observed for the infarct cases compared to the healthy case (histogram <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>), as both <inline-formula id="inf60">
<mml:math id="m65">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf61">
<mml:math id="m66">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are affected by infarction. For the healthy case, all velocities are within range of 0.20 and 0.49&#xa0;m/s, where the majority is between 0.26 and 0.43&#xa0;m/s. For the infarct case, the majority is still within the same range, but conduction slowing induced velocities below 0.20&#xa0;m/s as well.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Top: Histogram of CV<sub>T</sub> values for the healthy and transmural infarct case as obtained with the extended model. The majority of the tissue in the extended models has a CV<sub>T</sub> in the range of 0.26&#x2013;0.43&#xa0;m/s. For the infarct case, velocities below 0.2&#xa0;m/s are observed, which are not present for the healthy case. Furthermore, CV<sub>T</sub> for the reference model is given as well, in which CV<sub>T</sub> is divided over three velocities to represent completely non-viable (first bar), BZ (third bar) and remote tissue (seventh bar). For this reference model, a velocity of 0.3&#xa0;m/s is assigned to tissue remote from the infarct, which covers 89% of the wall volume (out of frame in the histogram shown). Bottom: Spatial CV<sub>T</sub> distributions over the LV for the two chronic infarcts, for the extended (top row) and reference model (bottom row). The same discretization and colors are used as for the histogram above.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-15-1330157-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The spatial distributions of CV<sub>T</sub> are shown in the lower half of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>. For both reference (bottom row) and extended (top row) models, conduction slowing is mainly localized at the infarct region. However, for the extended models, this is not limited to the structural BZ but extends to remote parts close to the infarct as well. These regions can be described as functional BZ as they have impaired mechanics due to their connection to the infarct area. Through the model extension, the tissue volume with severe conduction slowing (CV<sub>T</sub> &#x2264; 0.1&#xa0;m/s) increased from 13.0 to 17.5&#xa0;mL (&#x2b;35%) for the transmural infarct case. For the non-transmural infarct case, this increased from 10.6 to 17.6&#xa0;mL (&#x2b;66%). Furthermore, CV<sub>T</sub> heterogeneity is present in far remote tissue, where higher values are located towards the endocardium, and rapid CV<sub>T</sub> changes are present at the apex.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Electrophysiology</title>
<sec id="s3-2-1">
<title>3.2.1 Repolarization time gradients</title>
<p>A total of 24 (2&#x2a;12 settings) RTG maps were created, 2 CV<sub>T</sub> distributions (reference and extended) for the 2 infarct cases with 6 stimulus sites each. We found that largest RTG values are clustered at the boundary of the structural BZ, in which a prolonged APD was implemented. The mechanics-extension further enhances these high RTG values at the structural BZ boundary (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>, left).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Left: repolarization time gradient maps for the reference model, extended model, and the difference (mechanics-extended minus reference). The extended model further highlights the high gradients on the boundary of the ionic-remodeled border zone. Right: RTG<sub>vol</sub> and RTG<sub>mean</sub> per pacing site (dots), with their average values (color bars) and standard deviations (black bars) for both the reference and extended models.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-15-1330157-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>RTG<sub>vol</sub> and RTG<sub>mean</sub> values with their average and standard deviations across the 6 stimulation sites are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref> (right-side). The mechanics extension causes RTG<sub>vol</sub> to increase for all 18 simulation settings. For both infarct cases, this increase in RTG<sub>vol</sub> is on average 1.3&#xa0;mL. The mechanics extension has minimal effect on RTG<sub>mean</sub>, which is similar for reference and mechanics-extended simulations, and remains between 12.7 and 14.0&#xa0;ms/mm for all simulations. RTG<sub>mean</sub> increased with 0.09&#xa0;ms/mm for the transmural cases, and with 0.26&#xa0;ms/mm for the non-tranmsural infarct case. Overall, strain-induced remodeling increased both the volume with severe conduction slowing and RTG the most (dangerous) for the non-transmural infarct case. For a more detailed insight in the effect of the extension on RTG, RTG histograms for the transmural infarct case are given in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Appendix A</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-2">
<title>3.2.2 Virtual stress test</title>
<p>Vulnerable windows for both the reference and extended models are given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref> (middle). The mechanics-extension has several effects. For the transmural infarct, it more than doubled the vulnerable window width. Importantly, the three VTs as induced in the reference model (labeled X, Y and Z in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>) could be replicated. Their exit sites covered a larger area (orange lines in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>, right-side) compared to the reference results. Additionally, two novel VT patterns (U and V) could be induced. A more detailed analysis showed that the increased inducibility in the extended model was caused by an elongated line of conduction block compared to the reference, due to the enhanced RTGs on the structural BZ boundary. This, together with the additional conduction slowing adjacent to the structural BZ, allowed VT to be more easily sustained. The membrane voltage plot left in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref> demonstrates this finding: the reentrant pathway is not sustained in the reference model, as the tissue was not ready for re-activation when the wavefront arrived too early, in contrast to the extended model due to a slightly longer cycle time.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Left: an example of an VT activation times map which shows that VT inducibility can differ for the two models, especially when the effect of the S2 stimulus is on de edge between propagation (white arrow) or conduction block (white block). Middle: vulnerable windows are given with pacing sites A through F on the vertical and S1-S2 time intervals [ms] on the horizontal axis. Color coding indicates whether VT was induced for the reference (gray) or the mechanics-extended model (orange). Characters (U-Z) are used to indicate which windows showed the same VTs. Right: Exit points for each VT pattern are visualized in a schematic representation of the epicardium and endocardium. The assigned characters correspond to those next to the vulnerable windows, and are colored orange if they appeared in the extended model only.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-15-1330157-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Despite its high RTG metrics, only small vulnerable windows are present for the non-transmural infarct case (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>, middle). The induced VT patterns differ completely between the reference and extended model. However, their small inducibility windows (5&#xa0;ms) make them clinically irrelevant.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2-3">
<title>3.2.3 Sensitivity testing</title>
<p>The <inline-formula id="inf62">
<mml:math id="m67">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf63">
<mml:math id="m68">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> parameters of the strain amplitude-CV<sub>T</sub> model (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2_4">2.4</xref>; Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2_5">2.5</xref>) were varied to perform a sensitivity test on the transmural infarct case. This resulted in steepness and horizontal shift variations of the strain amplitude-CV<sub>T</sub> relational curve as shown in the top row of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>. For each setting, a simulation is performed resulting in a total of 13 RTG maps which are analyzed in terms of RTG<sub>vol</sub> and RTG<sub>mean</sub>. Within the tested range, the maximal variation in RTG<sub>vol</sub> (second row of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>) is smaller for altering <inline-formula id="inf64">
<mml:math id="m69">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (0.9&#xa0;mL) or <inline-formula id="inf65">
<mml:math id="m70">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (0.6&#xa0;mL) than for altering pacing sites (1.7&#xa0;mL, right side <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>: mechanics-extended, transmural infarction). The variations in RTG<sub>mean</sub> are minimal. Finally, with the simultaneous increase of <inline-formula id="inf66">
<mml:math id="m71">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and decrease of <inline-formula id="inf67">
<mml:math id="m72">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, variability in RTG<sub>vol</sub> (0.29&#xa0;mL) and RTG<sub>mean</sub> (0.2&#xa0;ms/mm) is smallest as the curves overlap in the low range of CV<sub>T</sub>, critical for cell-uncoupling and thus RTG. This overlap is also present in histograms of critical RTGs, from which a complete overview is given in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Appenidx B</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Sensitivity testing of the <inline-formula id="inf53">
<mml:math id="m58">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> function. The <inline-formula id="inf54">
<mml:math id="m59">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf55">
<mml:math id="m60">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> parameters are adjusted to obtain homogeneous increments in steepness and shifts of the curve (top row). The corresponding effects on RTG<sub>vol</sub> is shown for one pacing site (second row). The central values for <inline-formula id="inf56">
<mml:math id="m61">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf57">
<mml:math id="m62">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&#x3b5;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">V</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (black lines in the top row) are used as default for the stress test simulations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>) for which six pacing sites are used.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fphys-15-1330157-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<p>In this study, we explore the hypothesis that chronic changes in mechanical load, expressed in terms of fiber-strain amplitude over the cardiac cycle, affect the transverse electrical propagation velocity and thereby affect VT risk. Therefore, a phenomenological model to describe strain-induced remodeling is implemented as an extension to virtual-heart models from literature.</p>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>4.1 Methodological modifications</title>
<p>To include the effect of mechanical tissue load, we introduced several modifications to our reference electrophysiology methods. First, in the reference model, CV<sub>T</sub> is altered in the structural BZ based on measurements in canine infarcts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Yao et al., 2003</xref>). Supported by cultured cell experiments, we proposed a phenomenological model in which CV<sub>T</sub> is altered by recurring strain amplitudes, on top of the effect of structural abnormalities. We found a strong positive correlation (r<sup>2</sup> &#x3d; 0.952) between experimental CV<sub>T</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Poelzing et al., 2004</xref>) and simulated myofiber strain amplitude, as they were both lower at the epicardium and higher in the last 60% towards the endocardium. We fitted the model on this correlation, by setting the central CV<sub>T</sub> to 0.3&#xa0;m/s as is done conventionally, around which CV<sub>T</sub> varies due to the effects of strain. This adaptation results in different CV<sub>T</sub> values for infarct and healthy regions as strain modulates around the stiff infarct.</p>
<p>Second, the effect of fibrotic density on CV<sub>T</sub> is modelled as a continuous linear relation, instead of the discrete 3-level relation assumed in conventional models. In this way, the highest fibrotic density naturally results in no electrical activity in the non-viable infarct core. Additionally, the spatial CV<sub>T</sub> distribution is more heterogeneous as it results from the combined effects of fibrosis and fiber-strain amplitudes. These amplitudes are, for example, not constant over the wall depth, and are modulated nearby the stiff infarct. The CV<sub>T</sub> distribution is therefore discretized in 10 levels instead of the aforementioned 3 (core, structural BZ, and remote) in the reference model.</p>
<p>Thirdly, in order to follow the Poelzing data used in the relationship between experimental CV<sub>T</sub> and strain, we introduced in our model the transmural APD gradient present in those experimental canine data too. The presence of such transmural APD gradients in human data has been a topic of discussion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Boukens et al., 2015</xref>). For completeness, we have performed simulations without the transmural APD gradient too (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Appendix A</xref>). Here we implemented a homogeneous APD (287&#xa0;ms when paced with 600&#xa0;ms intervals) over the wall depth. For these simulations, RTGs were lower than for the simulations with transmural APD gradient, and no VTs could be induced. This might be caused by the smaller difference in APD between remote and border zone tissue in this model. Moreover, the occurrence of VT is a binary &#x2018;all-or-nothing&#x2019; response, sensitive to various modeling choices. Introducing the effect of strain on CV<sub>T</sub> might result in VTs in more critical cases. However, the impact of mechanics on electrophysiology substrate is similar under both conditions (with and without transmural APD gradient), enhancing RTGs on the border of the infarct area.</p>
<p>Fourth, we apply a weak coupling between the model of mechanics and electrophysiology. This is motivated from the long time-scale of conduction remodeling observed in cultured cell experiments. This remodeling took a few hours of applied pulsatile stretch, and persisted several hours after the stretch was removed. We assumed that recurring &#x2018;pulsatile&#x2019; strains are mimicked during hours of sinus rhythm, which will induce remodeling of CV<sub>T</sub>. These effects would persist long enough to remain in the short timeframe during which stress test pacing is applied. Additionally, the period of pacing is too short to induce further remodeling. It was therefore sufficient to only simulate mechanics during sinus rhythm, from which the results are used to define a static distribution of CV<sub>T</sub>. The numerical uncoupling of mechanics and electrophysiology saves computational costs, and easily allows usage of different simulation environments and mesh compositions for both domains. The downside is that it overlooks instantaneous processes, like the (dynamic) response of strain-sensitive ion channels. However, this was not needed for the focus of our study on tissue remodeling (permanent) over time, in search for underlying mechanisms of VT evolution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>4.2 Tissue heterogeneity and VT risk</title>
<p>Our results show a significant effect of mechanical load on the simulation outcome of cardiac electrophysiology. For the healthy LV, transmural variety in fiber strains resulted in heterogeneity in CV<sub>T</sub> over the ventricular wall depth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). The largest strains and, therefore, the highest CV<sub>T</sub> are found at the endocardium, which is in agreement with experimental results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Poelzing et al., 2004</xref>). For the infarcted LV, elevated or reduced fiber-strain amplitudes caused further CV<sub>T</sub> heterogeneity at the infarct area. It should be noted that this resulted in CV<sub>T</sub> slowing in remote regions adjacent to fibrotic areas, opposed to conventional models where conduction slowing is limited to structural regions only. Including this functional BZ within regions of impaired mechanics might be a first step in modeling continuous infarct remodeling and expansion.</p>
<p>A second effect of the extension is an increase in tissue volume with severe conduction slowing and in RTG<sub>vol</sub>, which are both substrate metrics. The increase in RTG<sub>vol</sub> was localized at the structural BZ boundary (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). We think the lowered CV<sub>T</sub> adjacent to the structural BZ facilitates cell-to-cell uncoupling on the BZ boundary. This enhances the expression of differences in APD between the structural BZ (longer) and adjacent remote tissue (shorter), increasing RTG on the boundary in between. The elevated RTG caused the lines of conduction block to be longer, resulting in larger reentrant circuits. This, in combination with the lowered CV<sub>T</sub> in the remote part of reentrant pathways, can prolong reentrant cycle time and more easily result in sustained VT. Those effects might be even more pronounced if cardiomyocyte and APD heterogeneity after infarction is caused by mechanical load as well, as suggested in recent work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Amoni et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>LV ejection fraction reduced from 61% in the healthy case to 55% and 56% in the two infarct cases, and did not indicate the difference in VT inducibility. It may show that the LV ejection fraction as current clinical marker is a too global indicator for mechanical function and VT risk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Deng et al., 2016</xref>). Our hypothesized strain-induced remodeling might be a way to include local mechanical dysfunction in the assessment of VT risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<title>4.3 Clinical implications</title>
<p>The hypothesized strain-induced remodeling of CV<sub>T</sub> might help detect critical regions in the modelled heart. Our extended model could replicate the VT morphologies and their exit sites as identified by the reference model. This is desirable as in previous studies the exit sites as predicted by conventional models and observed retro- and prospectively matched quite well for several swine and human cases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Prakosa et al., 2018</xref>). On top of that, novel induced VTs were observed which can lead to identification of additional ablation targets.</p>
<p>The methods presented in this study might be a first step in modeling the effects of pathology induced changes in mechanics on VT risk, which is of interest as post-infarct patients can develop heart failure or dilation. This can alter strain, and a correlation between those diseases, heterogeneous connexin distribution, dispersed impulse conduction, and VT risk is shown (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Peters et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kitamura et al., 2002</xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">van Rijen et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Boulaksil et al., 2010</xref>). However, further experiments should be performed to validate our results and the implemented strain-induced remodeling of CV<sub>T</sub>, as it remains a theoretical hypothesis unproved.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-4">
<title>4.4 Limitations and recommendations</title>
<p>In this study, the phenomenological model proposed captures the effects of strain on CV<sub>T</sub>, implicitly capturing the role of connexin. Connexin proteins are often assumed to be the link between strain and conductivity, because strain affects connexin expression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Shanker et al., 2005</xref>), which in turn affects myocardial conductance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">van Rijen et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Boulaksil et al., 2010</xref>). In future work, explicitly including connexin in a more detailed model might help to obtain additional insight into the process of CV<sub>T</sub> remodeling over time.</p>
<p>Both our mechanics and electrophysiology models are partly based on animal data. For example, the reference electrophysiology model from literature already included conduction slowing and a prolonged APD in the border zone, which they based on canine data. In our model extension, we had to determine the CV<sub>T</sub>-strain relationship from canine CV<sub>T</sub> data too. Although we believe our current approach is sufficiently relevant to human conditions to study the potential modulating effects of mechanical strain on conduction velocity, this species mismatch should preferably be addressed in future studies.</p>
<p>Strain data from endo-to epicardium in literature is divers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ashikaga et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bogaert and Rademakers, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Costa et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Takayama et al., 2002</xref>), which results in uncertainty in the accuracy of the relationship between strain and CV<sub>T</sub> proposed. Therefore, we investigated the effect of parameter variation in the extended model. In particular, we focused on parameters that alter the steepness and shift of the relation proposed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). We found the definition of the relation for low strain amplitudes (&#x2c2;0.12) to be critical. Relational changes for this range affected RTG results the most, because those low amplitudes are found in and around the BZ, where they determine the amount of conduction slowing. This finding stresses that further research is needed to investigate whether the proposed relation correctly describes strain-induced remodeling of CV<sub>T</sub>, especially for lower strain amplitudes. Further improvements may be obtained with personalized models, which allows for validation by linking patient-specific strain-imaging data.</p>
<p>In the model of mechanics, chronic infarct areas were implemented by increasing the stiffness as a result of fibrotic tissue, and by reducing contractility due to a loss of myocytes. However, contraction was initiated simultaneously throughout the LV, neglecting asynchronous electrical activation. As a next step, this can be included which would allow simulation of a feed forward cycle to describe post-infarct tissue evolution. Altered strains around the infarct may affect the electrical conductivity, which will affect mechanical activation in turn and therefore further modulate the strain. This cycle can then be repeated. Such a feed forward cycle is not yet included.</p>
<p>Finally, in this work, only one mechanics cardiac cycle was simulated which is not enough to reach hemodynamic steady state. To investigate the consequences, we performed a convergence study in which we ran the model for transmural infarct for 5 subsequent cycles. On top of that, both the mechanics and electrophysiology mesh was refined, and the number of CV<sub>T</sub> discretization levels was doubled. Strain amplitudes remained similar in remote areas while low strain amplitudes in the BZ region (&#xb1;0.15) further reduced by up to 0.02. The spatial CV<sub>T</sub> distribution remained similar and CV<sub>T</sub> in the BZ reduced maximally with 0.06&#xa0;m/s. The lowered amplitudes and CV<sub>T</sub> further enhance the effect of the mechanics extension, and the effect on the critical RTG substrate remained the same (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Appendix A</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>5 Conclusion</title>
<p>We hypothesized that transverse myocardial conduction velocity alters with recurring myofiber strain amplitude. In a model of cardiac electromechanics, this hypothesis led to transverse conduction slowing in the structural BZ, successfully replicating its abnormal electrophysiological behavior. On top of that, conduction slowing was heterogeneous and extended into tissue regions adjacent to the infarct area, with impaired mechanical function. This &#x2018;functional&#x2019; BZ fostered accumulation of high repolarization time gradients along the structural substrate boundary. In a stress test, it led to an increase of the vulnerable window of occurring VTs, and additional VT patterns. Our hypothesis might be a first step to consider the effects of pathology induced changes in mechanical diseases in silico VT-risk estimations. However, further experiments should be performed to investigate the accuracy of the relationship between strain and conductivity proposed.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>EW: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing&#x2013;original draft, Investigation, Software. KJ: Methodology, Writing&#x2013;review and editing, Software. LD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing&#x2013;review and editing. FvV: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing&#x2013;review and editing, Project administration, Resources. MC: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing&#x2013;review and editing, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources. PB: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing&#x2013;review and editing, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Software.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This publication is part of the computational-model-based decision support for patients at risk for sustained ventricular tachycardias project (project no. 17983) of the research program High Tech Systems and Materials which is financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>Author MC was employed by Philips Research Eindhoven.</p>
<p>The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
<p>The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2024.1330157/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2024.1330157/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Amoni</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vermoortele</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ekhteraei-Tousi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Do&#xf1;ate Puertas</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gilbert</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Youness</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Heterogeneity of repolarization and cell-cell variability of cardiomyocyte remodeling with in the myocardial infarction border zone contribute to arrhythmia susceptibility</article-title>. <source>Circulation Arrhythmia Electrophysiol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>e011677</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/CIRCEP.122.011677</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arevalo</surname>
<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vadakkumpadan</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guallar</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jebb</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malamas</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>K. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Arrhythmia risk stratification of patients after myocardial infarction using personalized heart models</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>11437</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11438</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms11437</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ashikaga</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coppola</surname>
<given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hopenfeld</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leifer</surname>
<given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McVeigh</surname>
<given-names>E. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Omens</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Transmural dispersion of myofiber mechanics: implications for electrical heterogeneity <italic>in vivo</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.</source> <volume>49</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>909</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>916</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.074</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ashikaga</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Spoel</surname>
<given-names>T. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coppola</surname>
<given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Omens</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Transmural myocardial mechanics during isovolumic contraction</article-title>. <source>JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging</source> <volume>2</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>202</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.11.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bogaert</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rademakers</surname>
<given-names>F. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Regional nonuniformity of normal adult human left ventricle</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Physiology-Heart Circulatory Physiology</source> <volume>280</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>H610</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>H620</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.2.H610</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Boukens</surname>
<given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sulkin</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gloschat</surname>
<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ng</surname>
<given-names>F. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vigmond</surname>
<given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Efimov</surname>
<given-names>I. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Transmural APD gradient synchronizes repolarization in the human left ventricular wall</article-title>. <source>Cardiovasc. Res.</source> <volume>108</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>188</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>196</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cvr/cvv202</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Boulaksil</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winckels</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Engelen</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stein</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Veen</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jansen</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Heterogeneous Connexin43 distribution in heart failure is associated with dispersed conduction and enhanced susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. heart Fail.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>913</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>921</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/eurjhf/hfq092</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bovendeerd</surname>
<given-names>P. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kroon</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delhaas</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Determinants of left ventricular shear strain</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Physiology-Heart Circulatory Physiology</source> <volume>297</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>H1058</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>H1068</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpheart.01334.2008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cluitmans</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bear</surname>
<given-names>L. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nguy&#xea;n</surname>
<given-names>U. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Rees</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stoks</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ter Bekke</surname>
<given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Noninvasive detection of spatiotemporal activation-repolarization interactions that prime idiopathic ventricular fibrillation</article-title>. <source>Sci. Transl. Med.</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>620</issue>), <fpage>eabi9317</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/scitranslmed.abi9317</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Costa</surname>
<given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoetzl</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rocha</surname>
<given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prassl</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Plank</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Automatic parameterization strategy for cardiac electrophysiology simulations</article-title>. <source>Comput. Cardiol.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>376</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arevalo</surname>
<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prakosa</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Callans</surname>
<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trayanova</surname>
<given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A feasibility study of arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction</article-title>. <source>EP Eur.</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>iv60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>iv66</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/europace/euw351</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Franzone</surname>
<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pavarino</surname>
<given-names>L. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taccardi</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Effects of transmural electrical heterogeneities and electrotonic interactions on the dispersion of cardiac repolarization and action potential duration: a simulation study</article-title>. <source>Math. Biosci.</source> <volume>204</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>132</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>165</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mbs.2006.06.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Greener</surname>
<given-names>I. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sasano</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Igarashi</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strom</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosenbaum</surname>
<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Connexin43 gene transfer reduces ventricular tachycardia susceptibility after myocardial infarction</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.</source> <volume>60</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1110</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.042</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jacot</surname>
<given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raskin</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Omens</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCulloch</surname>
<given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tung</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Mechanostransduction in cardiac and stem-cell derived cardiac cells</article-title>. <source>Mechanosensitivity Heart</source>, <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>139</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-90-481-2850-1_5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Janssens</surname>
<given-names>K. L. P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kraamer</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barbarotta</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bovendeerd</surname>
<given-names>P. H. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Post-infarct evolution of ventricular and myocardial function</article-title>. <source>Biomechanics Model. Mechanobiol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>1815</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1828</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10237-023-01734-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kitamura</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohnishi</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoshida</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Okajima</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azumi</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ishida</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Heterogeneous loss of connexin43 protein in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with ventricular tachycardia</article-title>. <source>J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>865</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>870</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00865.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kruithof</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amirrajab</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cluitmans</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lau</surname>
<given-names>K. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Breeuwer</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Influence of image artifacts on image-based computer simulations of the cardiac electrophysiology</article-title>. <source>Comput. Biol. Med.</source> <volume>137</volume>, <fpage>104773</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104773</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peters</surname>
<given-names>N. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coromilas</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Severs</surname>
<given-names>N. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wit</surname>
<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Disturbed connexin43 gap junction distribution correlates with the location of reentrant circuits in the epicardial border zone of healing canine infarcts that cause ventricular tachycardia</article-title>. <source>Circulation</source> <volume>95</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>988</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>996</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/01.cir.95.4.988</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pimentel</surname>
<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamada</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kl&#xe9;ber</surname>
<given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saffitz</surname>
<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Autocrine regulation of myocyte Cx43 expression by VEGF</article-title>. <source>Circulation Res.</source> <volume>90</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>671</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>677</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/01.res.0000014823.75393.4d</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Poelzing</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akar</surname>
<given-names>F. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baron</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosenbaum</surname>
<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Heterogeneous connexin43 expression produces electrophysiological heterogeneities across ventricular wall</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Physiology-Heart Circulatory Physiology</source> <volume>286</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>H2001</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>H2009</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpheart.00987.2003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Poelzing</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosenbaum</surname>
<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Altered connexin43 expression produces arrhythmia substrate in heart failure</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Physiology-Heart Circulatory Physiology</source> <volume>287</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>H1762</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>H1770</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpheart.00346.2004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Popescu</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shade</surname>
<given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lai</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aronis</surname>
<given-names>K. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ouyang</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moorthy</surname>
<given-names>M. V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Arrhythmic sudden death survival prediction using deep learning analysis of scarring in the heart</article-title>. <source>Nat. Cardiovasc. Res.</source> <volume>1</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>334</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>343</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s44161-022-00041-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prakosa</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arevalo</surname>
<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boyle</surname>
<given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nikolov</surname>
<given-names>P. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ashikaga</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Personalized virtual-heart technology for guiding the ablation of infarct-related ventricular tachycardia</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biomed. Eng.</source> <volume>2</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>732</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>740</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41551-018-0282-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Restivo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gough</surname>
<given-names>W. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>el-Sherif</surname>
<given-names>N. A. B. I. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Ventricular arrhythmias in the subacute myocardial infarction period. High-resolution activation and refractory patterns of reentrant rhythms</article-title>. <source>Circulation Res.</source> <volume>66</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1310</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1327</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/01.res.66.5.1310</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shade</surname>
<given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prakosa</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Popescu</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Okada</surname>
<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chrispin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Predicting risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis using multimodality imaging and personalized heart modeling in a multivariable classifier</article-title>. <source>Sci. Adv.</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>31</issue>), <fpage>eabi8020</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/sciadv.abi8020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shanker</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamada</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Green</surname>
<given-names>K. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamada</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saffitz</surname>
<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Matrix protein&#x2013;specific regulation of Cx43 expression in cardiac myocytes subjected to mechanical load</article-title>. <source>Circulation Res.</source> <volume>96</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>558</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>566</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/01.RES.0000158964.42008.a2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shyu</surname>
<given-names>K. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>B. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuan</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Angiotensin II receptor antagonist blocks the expression of connexin43 induced by cyclical mechanical stretch in cultured neonatal rat cardiac myocytes</article-title>. <source>J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.</source> <volume>33</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>691</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>698</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jmcc.2000.1333</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Solomon</surname>
<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zelenkofske</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McMurray</surname>
<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Finn</surname>
<given-names>P. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Velazquez</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ertl</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Sudden death in patients with myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both</article-title>. <source>N. Engl. J. Med.</source> <volume>352</volume> (<issue>25</issue>), <fpage>2581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2588</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMoa043938</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Srinivasan</surname>
<given-names>N. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orini</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Providencia</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dhinoja</surname>
<given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lowe</surname>
<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahsan</surname>
<given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Prolonged action potential duration and dynamic transmural action potential duration heterogeneity underlie vulnerability to ventricular tachycardia in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation</article-title>. <source>EP Eur.</source> <volume>21</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>616</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>625</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/europace/euy260</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Takayama</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Costa</surname>
<given-names>K. D.</given-names>
</name> <name>
<surname>Covell</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Contribution of laminar myofiber architecture to load-dependent changes in mechanics of LV myocardium</article-title>. <source>American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology</source> <volume>282</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>H1510</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>H1520</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ten Tusscher</surname>
<given-names>K. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Panfilov</surname>
<given-names>A. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Alternans and spiral breakup in a human ventricular tissue model</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Physiology-Heart Circulatory Physiology</source> <volume>291</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>H1088</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>H1100</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpheart.00109.2006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van Rijen</surname>
<given-names>H. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eckardt</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Degen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Theis</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ott</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Willecke</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Slow conduction and enhanced anisotropy increase the propensity for ventricular tachyarrhythmias in adult mice with induced deletion of connexin43</article-title>. <source>Circulation</source> <volume>109</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1048</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1055</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/01.CIR.0000117402.70689.75</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>T. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tseng</surname>
<given-names>Y. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Regulation of connexin 43 gene expression by cyclical mechanical stretch in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes</article-title>. <source>Biochem. biophysical Res. Commun.</source> <volume>267</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>551</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>557</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/bbrc.1999.1988</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hussain</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patel</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peters</surname>
<given-names>N. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boyden</surname>
<given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wit</surname>
<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Remodeling of gap junctional channel function in epicardial border zone of healing canine infarcts</article-title>. <source>Circulation Res.</source> <volume>92</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>437</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>443</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/01.RES.0000059301.81035.06</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhuang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamada</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saffitz</surname>
<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kl&#xe9;ber</surname>
<given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Pulsatile stretch remodels cell-to-cell communication in cultured myocytes</article-title>. <source>Circulation Res.</source> <volume>87</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>316</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>322</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/01.res.87.4.316</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>