Abstract
The band-7 protein family comprises a diverse set of membrane-bound proteins characterized by the presence of a conserved domain. The exact function of this band-7 domain remains elusive, but examples from animal and bacterial stomatin-type proteins demonstrate binding to lipids and the ability to assemble into membrane-bound oligomers that form putative scaffolds. Some members, such as prohibitins (PHB) and human stomatin-like protein 2 (HsSLP2), localize to the mitochondrial inner membrane where they function in cristae formation and hyperfusion. In Arabidopsis, the band-7 protein family has diversified and includes plant-specific members. Mitochondrial-localized members include prohibitins (AtPHBs) and two stomatin-like proteins (AtSLP1 and -2). Studies into PHB function in plants have demonstrated an involvement in root meristem proliferation and putative scaffold formation for mAAA proteases, but it remains unknown how these roles are achieved at the molecular level. In this minireview we summarize the current status of band-7 protein functions in Arabidopsis, and speculate how the mitochondrial members might recruit specific lipids to form microdomains that could shape the organization and functioning of the respiratory chain.
INTRODUCTION
Biological membranes are highly organized proteolipid domains and there is increasing evidence of fine-scale organization into microdomains (Whitelegge, 2011; ). These comprise localized assemblies of specific proteins and lipids and are important in the spatial and temporal control of membrane protein complex assembly and regulation. Membrane microdomains are formed by specific protein–protein and protein–lipid interactions that take place within and in the vicinity of membranes, often guided by specialized proteins acting as scaffolds. Some of the most important membrane-integrated protein complexes occur in the inner mitochondrial membrane, which houses the respiratory chain. Despite our increasing knowledge about the composition of respiratory complexes, we have a much less detailed understanding about the dynamics, regulation, and assembly of these complexes at the molecular level within the membrane environment. It is also unclear to what extent scaffold proteins and interactions with specific lipids are involved. In this review we highlight the functions of the band-7 family of scaffold proteins in plants and speculate how a conserved mechanism of self assembly into oligomeric ring structures together with lipid interactions could contribute to the creation of microenvironments within the mitochondrial inner membrane.
BAND-7 FAMILY PROTEINS: MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD PROTEINS WITH DIVERSE FUNCTIONS
The band-7 protein family comprises a diverse set of prokaryotic and eukaryotic membrane proteins characterized by the presence of a conserved “band-7” domain in the central regions of the protein sequence. The domain name stems from the first identified member, human stomatin (or erythrocyte band 7.2b protein). The superfamily is also known as “SPFH” according to the initials of its members (stomatin, prohibitin,flotillin, HflC/K; Tavernarakis et al., 1999). Band-7 family proteins generally form oligomers and regulate the assembly and activity of super-molecular protein complexes in various cellular localizations, often linked to membrane microdomains (). Despite its high degree of conservation, the precise function of the band-7 domain remains unknown in most organisms. Over the years numerous examples have emerged demonstrating regulation of various ion channels and transporters by stomatins (Price et al., 2004; ; Montel-Hagen et al., 2008). Prohibitins (PHB) function in mitochondrial cristae formation (Merkwirth et al., 2008), flotillins are lipid raft markers involved in trafficking events in animal cells (), and prokaryotic HflC/K type proteins regulate the activity of membrane-bound proteases ().
YEAST AND ANIMAL MITOCHONDRIAL BAND-7 PROTEINS ARE INVOLVED IN THE TURNOVER OF MEMBRANE PROTEINS AND AFFECT RESPIRATORY CHAIN ORGANIZATION AND MITOCHONDRIAL MORPHOLOGY
A small subset of eukaryotic band-7 proteins is localized to mitochondria. These include PHBs and mammalian stomatin-like protein 2 (SLP2), both of which have been implicated in regulating the activities of mitochondrial metalloproteases, thereby affecting processes such as cristae formation and respiratory chain assembly (Steglich et al., 1999; ; Merkwirth et al., 2008; Tondera et al., 2009).
The first native band-7 protein complex studied was the yeast PHB complex. This large complex (1.2 MDa) is composed of PHB1 and PHB2 units arranged as an oligomeric ring of 16–20 nm diameter and is associated with the mitochondrial inner membrane facing the intermembrane space (Nijtmans et al., 2000; Tatsuta et al., 2005). A second PHB complex was discovered in yeast that additionally contains a matrix-exposed AAA protease (Steglich et al., 1999). AAA-type proteases belong to the metalloprotease family and contain an additional ATP-hydrolysing domain. They are thought to function in membrane protein quality control (). PHB in yeast was found to negatively regulate matrix-AAA (mAAA) activity, thereby influencing turnover rates of mitochondrial-encoded respiratory chain subunits (Steglich et al., 1999). Transient associations of PHBs with cytochrome c oxidase subunits were demonstrated in yeast, implying that the PHB complex has chaperone functions in complex IV assembly (Nijtmans et al., 2000). Mammalian PHBs were also shown to interact with complex IV subunits, as well as with subunits of complex I (NADH dehydrogenase; ; Schleicher et al., 2008; Strub et al., 2010). Knockdown of PHBs in mouse cells also affects mitochondrial morphology because of altered proteolytic processing of the inner membrane GTPase OPA1 (optical atrophy 1) by metalloproteases (Merkwirth et al., 2008).
Detailed insight into band-7 protein complex formation was gained from a cystallography study of the conserved stomatin domain from mouse (). The basic unit in the crystal was found to be a banana-shaped dimer capable of forming a ring-shaped structure required for stomatin function in ion channel modulation. A ring structure was also observed by single particle analysis of a purified stomatin complex from cyanobacteria (), making it likely that other band-7 family proteins might also adapt this shape as assembled complexes. A related stomatin-like protein from human and rodents, SLP2 (stomatin-like protein 2), also forms a large (1.8 MDa) complex in mitochondria (Reifschneider et al., 2006). Notably, no ortholog of mammalian SLP2 is present in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mammalian SLP2 is peripherally associated with the mitochondrial inner membrane on the side of the intermembrane space (; ), where it forms a complex with mitofusin-2 (Mfn-2), a GTPase of the outer membrane mediating mitochondrial fusion. Mammalian SLP2 also interacts with PHBs in a smaller 250 kDa complex (). Knockdown of SLP2 in HeLa cells caused increased proteolysis of PHBs and respiratory chain subunits from complexes I and IV by metalloproteases (), as well as a reduction in membrane potential, but had no effect on mitochondrial morphology (). By contrast, SLP2 knockdown in mice was reported to be embryo lethal (), the same as knockouts of PHBs in mice (Merkwirth et al., 2008). A T-cell specific knockdown of SLP2 caused a reduction of complex I (NADH dehydrogenase) subunits and reduced complex I activity (). Interestingly, human recombinant SLP2 was demonstrated to bind preferentially to cardiolipin (CL) in an in vitro pull-down assay that utilized liposomes with varying phospholipid composition (), although the specificity of this interaction is debatable because the assay lacked additional control proteins. Additionally, yeast genetic studies have revealed that enzymes involved in CL and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) synthesis pathways are essential for survival in phb knockout strains, underlining a functional link between lipid synthesis and PHBs (; Osman et al., 2009).
PLANT BAND-7 PROTEINS
The band-7 protein family is more diverse in higher plants than it is in yeast and animals, and includes a plant-specific group of proteins classified as HIR (hypersensitive response induced), as well as a larger number of PHBs and two stomatin-like proteins (Nadimpalli et al., 2000). This large diversity in higher plants is down to gene duplications and may be linked to the requirement to adapt to environmental stress conditions (Van Aken et al., 2010).
The Arabidopsis genome encodes 17 genes that contain the band-7 domain (InterPro IPR001107). The gene products fall into five distinct classes based on sequence homologies with animal and yeast orthologs: seven genes belong to the PHBs, of which five are expressed, two are stomatin-like (AtSLP1 and -2), four belong to the HIR proteins (HIRs1-4), (Qi et al., 2011), three resemble flotillins, and one protein has similarities to erlin proteins from animals (; Figure 1A). Arabidopsis band-7 proteins are found in various subcellular membrane localizations according to the SUBA database (). Most of these locations are based on mass spectrometry data from various proteomics studies, but for PHBs, SLPs and HIRs, additional in vivo data from fluorescent tagging experiments are available (Marmagne et al., 2004; Van Aken et al., 2007, 2009; Qi et al., 2011; ). According to these data, Arabidopsis PHBs are primarily localized to mitochondria (Van Aken et al., 2007), although localization to the cytoplasm and the nucleus was suggested in a separate study (). However, this result is controversial because cytoplasmic localization was not confirmed by any additional cytosolic markers. AtSLPs are found exclusively in mitochondria (), whereas HIRs are localized to the plasma membrane (Qi et al., 2011). Although nothing is known about the functions of the three flotillin-like proteins or the erlin-like protein, forward and reverse genetics studies have started to elucidate the molecular roles of HIRs, PHBs, and SLPs.
FIGURE 1
PLANT MITOCHONDRIAL BAND-7 MEMBERS
In plants, much less is known about the specific functions of SLPs and PHBs in mitochondria and how the complexes they form relate to each other. Research into plant PHBs and SLPs so far suggests that the two complexes are physically distinct and are not functionally redundant, yet they seem to share several functions with animal and yeast orthologs.
The best-studied plant band-7 family proteins are the PHBs. The seven Arabidopsis PHBs fall into two classes (type I or II) according to similarities with yeast and animal PHB1 and PHB2 (Van Aken et al., 2007, 2010). Reverse genetics has revealed diverse functions for plant PHBs (Van Aken et al., 2007). Knockout of AtPHB3 resulted in retarded growth of roots and shoots which was linked to reduced cell division and expansion in apical meristems, as well as alterations in mitochondrial morphology, indicative of a lack of cristae. By contrast, knockout of AtPHB4 did not result in any obvious growth phenotypes, but a double phb3/4 mutant was lethal. From this study it was concluded that AtPHBs are important to sustain increased metabolic demands related to cell division in meristems supporting differentiation in apical tissues.
A mutant in the phb3 gene was also identified as eer3-1, a loss-of function conditional point mutation allele leading to an extreme constitutive ethylene response in etiolated seedlings (). An independent loss-of function allele, phb3-3 was identified in a mutagenesis screen for deficiencies in hydrogen peroxide-induced nitric oxide (NO) accumulation (Wang et al., 2010). This point mutation was mapped to a glycine to aspartate change inside the conserved band-7 domain, but it remains unknown what effect this mutation has on PHB complex formation. Both phb3-3 and an independent T-DNA knockout allele showed NO-related phenotypes and increased resistance to high salinity, pointing toward yet unknown functions of PHB3 in NO homeostasis, possibly via the respiratory chain.
Tandem-affinity purification of tagged PHB3 revealed that it interacts with all other expressed PHBs (1, 2, 3, 4, and 6), as well as some enzymes and proteins of unknown function (Van Aken et al., 2007). Some class II PHBs have also been found associated with subcomplexes of complex I, possibly as contaminants in mass spectrometry studies (). The native PHB complex was later characterized by two-dimensional blue native and SDS-PAGE (Piechota et al., 2010). Arabidopsis PHBs form a hetero-oligomeric complex of 1 MDa, but they also participate in a 2 MDa complex together with the mAAA proteases FtsH3 and FtsH10. No complex containing a FtsH protease without PHBs could be identified, suggesting that the PHB complex acts as a scaffold to stabilize the FtsH oligomeric complexes. Other studies of PHBs in Petunia flowers and in tobacco leaves indicated links to cellular senescence, reactive oxygen species production and mitochondrial morphology (; ). Based on these findings, PHBs were suggested to act as universal scaffolds in the mitochondrial inner membrane, likely associated with lipid microdomains that affect a variety of mitochondrial processes (Van Aken et al., 2010).
The two other mitochondrial band-7 family members, stomatin-like proteins (SLPs) were established as mitochondrial proteins in various proteomics studies (Millar et al., 2001; ; ). SLP1 has also been identified in detergent-resistant membrane fractions thought to be derived from the plasma membrane (). The AtSLP1 protein was also shown to be capable of binding to Zn2+ (Tan et al., 2010) and is threonine-phosphorylated within its hydrophilic C-terminus (). Both AtSLP transcripts were upregulated in the phb3 mutant, and AtSLP2 has been identified as a stress-responsive gene in a number of microarray experiments (Van Aken et al., 2009).
Our own work has dealt with functionally characterizing AtSLP1 (At4g27585) and AtSLP2 (At5g54100). Both AtSLPs have one conserved band-7 domain, as well as one hydrophobic stretch located within this conserved domain (Figure 1B). We have identified a class II (-3R) mitochondrial targeting sequence (MTC) in both SLP sequences, which, upon cleavage, results in a short N-terminal sequence that is probably located in the mitochondrial matrix. The bulk of the proteins likely reside in the intermembrane space. Mature SLP1 is slightly longer (368 amino acids) than SLP2 (360 amino acids), and it possesses a unique hydrophilic C-terminus not present in SLP2 that harbors the phosphorylation site ().
We have localized SLP1 to a large protein complex (3 MDa) in the mitochondrial inner membrane where it most likely interacts with AtSLP2, possibly organized in a ring shape. Sequence homologies suggest that AtSLPs are the plant orthologs of animal SLP2. Knockout of AtSLP1, but not AtSLP2 affects the abundance of complex I and related supercomplexes, but not other respiratory complexes (). We interpret this specific effect on complex I either as a consequence of deficient complex I assembly, or an increased complex I turnover that is mediated by proteases (likely of the AAA-type) in the inner membrane.
We also hypothesize that complex I deficiency in the absence of SLP1 is related to changes that occur in the local membrane environment. The sequence homology of AtSLPs with human SLP2 may suggest that Arabidopsis SLPs can also bind to specific mitochondrial inner membrane lipids such as CL and PE. Lipid-binding could occur at residues located within the hydrophobic SLP membrane anchor, and may help stabilize the membrane anchorage of the SLP oligomers. Additionally, residues found within the band-7 domain could bind to lipids, possibly to keep the SLP complex in close proximity to the inner membrane (Figure 1C). This scenario resembles binding of cholesterol by the stomatin proteins podocin and C. elegans Mec-2 to the N-terminal hydrophobic domains and the band-7 domain (). Cholesterol binding was mapped to, a conserved proline residue located just upstream of the band-7 domain that proved to be crucial for ion channel regulation by Mec-2.
In a similar manner, the plant PHB complex is likely to bind lipids (CL and/or PE) and assembles into a ring-shaped structure, with the C-termini facing the intermembrane space. Protein interaction data derived from PHBs so far suggest no physical associations between SLPs and PHBs in Arabidopsis (Van Aken et al., 2007; Piechota et al., 2010), and it is not clear how the two complexes relate to each other functionally. Because of their different gene expression patterns in Arabidopsis based on microarray data and on promoter-GUS fusion plants (Van Aken et al., 2007; ) and the differing growth phenotypes of knockout mutants, we conclude that PHBs and SLPs are not functionally redundant. For example, class I PHBs are highly expressed in root meristem tissue and single phb3 knockout mutants have a dwarfed growth phenotype with short roots, whereas class I double phb mutants are embryo lethal. By contrast, SLP genes are not highly expressed in root meristems, and slp1/2 double knockout plants are viable and do not show abnormal growth morphology (). Currently nothing is known about respiratory chain function and the abundance of supercomplexes in phb mutants.
DO PLANT PROHIBITINS AND STOMATIN-LIKE PROTEINS COOPERATE IN RESPIRATORY CHAIN ASSEMBLY?
We suggest that a possible solution to the apparent functional specificity of SLPs and PHBs despite overlapping properties of the proteins could be that the two complexes cooperatively connect mitochondrial quality control (MQC) by proteases with respiratory chain assembly (Figure 2). Evidence from our work and from mice and HeLa cells points toward a specific function for the SLP complex in the assembly and/or turnover of complex I (; ; ). Studies into yeast and mouse PHBs suggest that the PHB complex likely functions in the assembly or turnover of complex IV (Nijtmans et al., 2000; Strub et al., 2010), although other studies imply that it is also related to complex I (; ). Cardiolipin-binding by SLP and PHB ring complexes could directly affect the formation of functional supercomplexes which are known to be dependent on the incorporation of multiple CL molecules internally and at the interphases between complexes (; Pineau et al., 2013). The SLP and PHB complexes likely change their local membrane environment by specifically sequestering CL and/or PE, possibly by forming a localized network of rings that helps respiratory chain assembly at specific sites. This could take place in a coordinated fashion between both complexes, such that both rings affect the membrane environment and each other by altering the tension, charge distribution and possibly even curvature of the inner membrane. Membrane-bound AAA-proteases likely contribute to turnover rates of respiratory chain components as part of MQC. In animal cells metalloproteases also help processing OPA1, thereby determining cristae ultrastructure and mitochondrial morphology (Merkwirth et al., 2008; Tondera et al., 2009). Recently, cristae morphology governed by OPA1 processing has also been linked to the assembly status of supercomplexes, although a direct connection between OPA1 and supercomplexes is so far missing (). In plants, no OPA1-like protein exists and the mechanism determining cristae morphology remains unknown.
FIGURE 2
In summary, we place SLP and PHB complexes at the heart of a mechanism that incorporates AAA proteases and phospholipids, thereby affecting respiratory chain function at the point of assembly and turnover. We hypothesize that CL/PE binding by SLPs/PHBs creates defined areas of respiratory chain assembly and quality control. Currently this theory is speculative, but could be addressed experimentally. Firstly, a detailed inventory about defects in the respiratory chain in the respective Arabidopsis mutant backgrounds is needed, in combination with an analysis of the lipid-binding properties of AtPHBs and AtSLPs. These results, together with complementary structure-function approaches and high resolution imaging techniques will give new insights into the extent of cooperation between these protein complexes and will clarify where their specificities lie. This information will not only advance our understanding of inner membrane compartmentation, but also help to elucidate band-7 protein function throughout the kingdoms.
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1
Ací-PérezR.Fernandez-SilvaP.PeleatoM. L.Perez-MartosA.EnriquezJ. A. (2008). Respiratory active mitochondrial supercomplexes.Mol. Cell32529–53910.1016/j.molcel.2008.10.021
2
AhnC. S.LeeJ. H.HwangA. R.KimW. T.PaiH. S. (2006). Prohibitin is involved in mitochondrial biogenesis in plants.Plant J.46658–66710.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02726.x
3
BazanS.MileykovskayaE.MallampalliV.HeacockP.SparagnaG. C.DowhanW. (2013). Cardiolipin-dependent reconstitution of respiratory supercomplexes from purified Saccharomyces cerevisiae complexes III and IV.J. Biol. Chem.288401–41110.1074/jbc.M112.425876
4
BirnerR.NebauerR.SchneiterR.DaumG. (2003). Synthetic lethal interaction of the mitochondrial phosphatidylethanolamine biosynthetic machinery with the prohibitin complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Mol. Biol. Cell14370–38310.1091/mbc.E02-05-0263
5
BoehmM.NieldJ.ZhangP. P.AroE. M.KomendaJ.NixonP. J. (2009). Structural and mutational analysis of band 7 proteins in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp strain PCC 6803.J. Bacteriol.1916425–643510.1128/JB.00644-09
6
BornerG. H. H.SherrierD. J.WeimarT.MichaelsonL. V.HawkinsN. D.MacAskillA.et al. (2005). Analysis of detergent-resistant membranes in Arabidopsis. Evidence for plasma membrane lipid rafts.Plant Physiol.137104–11610.1104/pp.104.053041
7
BourgesI.RamusC.de CamaretB. M.BeugnotR.RemacleC.CardolP.et al. (2004). Structural organization of mitochondrial human complex I: role of the ND4 and ND5 mitochondria-encoded subunits and interaction with prohibitin.Biochem. J.383491–49910.1042/BJ20040256
8
BrandJ.SmithE. S.SchwefelD.LapatsinaL.PooleK.OmerbasicD.et al. (2012). A stomatin dimer modulates the activity of acid-sensing ion channels.EMBO J.313635–364610.1038/emboj.2012.203
9
BrowmanD. T.HoeggM. B.RobbinsS. M. (2007). The SPFH domain-containing proteins: more than lipid raft markers.Trends Cell Biol.17394–40210.1016/j.tcb.2007.06.005
10
ChenJ. C.JiangC. Z.ReidM. S. (2005). Silencing a prohibitin alters plant development and senescence.Plant J.4416–2410.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02505.x
11
ChristiansM. J.LarsenP. B. (2007). Mutational loss of the prohibitin AtPHB3 results in an extreme constitutive ethylene response phenotype coupled with partial loss of ethylene-inducible gene expression in Arabidopsis seedlings.J. Exp. Bot.582237–224810.1093/jxb/erm086
12
ChristieD. A.LemkeC. D.EliasI. M.ChauL. A.KirchhofM. G.LiB.et al. (2011). Stomatin-like protein 2 binds cardiolipin and regulates mitochondrial biogenesis and function.Mol. Cell. Biol.313845–385610.1128/MCB.05393-11
13
ChristieD. A.MitsopoulosP.BlagihJ.DunnS. D.St-PierreJ.JonesR. G.et al. (2012). Stomatin-like protein 2 deficiency in T cells is associated with altered mitochondrial respiration and defective CD4(+) T cell responses.J. Immunol.1894349–436010.4049/jimmunol.1103829
14
CogliatiS.FrezzaC.SorianoM. E.VaranitaT.Quintana-CabreraR.CorradoM.et al. (2013). Mitochondrial cristae shape determines respiratory chain supercomplexes assembly and respiratory efficiency.Cell155160–17110.1016/j.cell.2013.08.032
15
Da CruzS.ParoneP. A.GonzaloP.BienvenutW. V.TonderaD.JourdainA.et al. (2008). SLP-2 interacts with prohibitins in the mitochondrial inner membrane and contributes to their stability.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1783904–91110.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.02.006
16
DunkleyT. P. J.HesterS.ShadforthI. P.RunionsJ.WeimarT.HantonS. L.et al. (2006). Mapping the Arabidopsis organelle proteome.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1036518–652310.1073/pnas.0506958103
17
EubelH.JanschL.BraunH. P. (2003). New insights into the respiratory chain of plant mitochondria. Supercomplexes and a unique composition of complex II.Plant Physiol.133274–28610.1104/pp.103.024620
18
GehlB.LeeC. P.BotaP.BlattM. R.SweetloveL. J. (2014). An Arabidopsis stomatin-like protein affects mitochondrial respiratory supercomplex organisation.Plant Physiol.1641389–140010.1104/pp.113.230383
19
GlebovO. O.BrightN. A.NicholsB. J. (2006). Flotillin-1 defines a clathrin-independent endocytic pathway in mammalian cells.Nat. Cell Biol.846–5410.1038/ncb1342
20
HajekP.ChomynA.AttardiG. (2007). Identification of a novel mitochondrial complex containing mitofusin 2 and stomatin-like protein 2.J. Biol. Chem.2825670–568110.1074/jbc.M608168200
21
HeazlewoodJ. L.Tonti-FilippiniJ. S.GoutA. M.DayD. A.WhelanJ.MillarA. H. (2004). Experimental analysis of the Arabidopsis mitochondrial proteome highlights signaling and regulatory components, provides assessment of targeting prediction programs, and indicates plant-specific mitochondrial proteins.Plant Cell16241–25610.1105/tpc.016055
22
HeazlewoodJ. L.VerboomR. E.Tonti-FilippiniJ.SmallI.MillarA. H. (2007). SUBA: the Arabidopsis subcellular database.Nucleic Acids Res.35D213–D21810.1093/nar/gkl863
23
HolthuisJ. C. M.UngermannC. (2013). Cellular microcompartments constitute general suborganellar functional units in cells.Biol. Chem.394151–16110.1515/hsz-2012-0265
24
HuberT. B.SchermerB.MullerR. U.HohneM.BartramM.CalixtoA.et al. (2006). Podocin and MEC-2 bind cholesterol to regulate the activity of associated ion channels.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10317079–1708610.1073/pnas.0607465103
25
ItoJ.TaylorN. L.CastledenI.WeckwerthW.MillarA. H.HeazlewoodJ. L. (2009). A survey of the Arabidopsis thaliana mitochondrial phosphoproteome.Proteomics94229–424010.1002/pmic.200900064
26
KiharaA.AkiyamaY.ItoK. (1996). A protease complex in the Escherichia coli plasma membrane: HflKC (HflA) forms a complex with FtsH (HflB), regulating its proteolytic activity against SecY.EMBO J.156122–6131.
27
KlodmannJ.SunderhausS.NimtzM.JanschL.BraunH. P. (2010). Internal Architecture of Mitochondrial Complex I from Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant Cell22797–81010.1105/tpc.109.073726
28
KolodziejczakM.GibalaM.UrantowkaA.JanskaH. (2007). The significance of Arabidopsis AAA proteases for activity and assembly/stability of mitochondrial OXPHOS complexes.Physiol. Plant.129135–14210.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00835.x
29
LangerT. (2000). AAA proteases: cellular machines for degrading membrane proteins.Trends Biochem. Sci.25247–25110.1016/S0968-0004(99)01541-8
30
MarmagneA.RouetM. A.FerroM.RollandN.AlconC.JoyardJ.et al. (2004). Identification of new intrinsic proteins in Arabidopsis plasma membrane proteome.Mol. Cell. Proteomics3675–69110.1074/mcp.M400001-MCP200
31
MerkwirthC.DargazanliS.TatsutaT.GeimerS.LowerB.WunderlichF. T.et al. (2008). Prohibitins control cell proliferation and apoptosis by regulating OPA1-dependent cristae morphogenesis in mitochondria.Genes Dev.22476–48810.1101/gad.460708
32
MillarA. H.SweetloveL. J.GiegeP.LeaverC. J. (2001). Analysis of the Arabidopsis mitochondrial proteome.Plant Physiol.1271711–172710.1104/pp.010387
33
Montel-HagenA.KinetS.ManelN.MongellazC.ProhaskaR.BattiniJ. L.et al. (2008). Erythrocyte glut1 triggers dehydroascorbic acid uptake in mammals unable to synthesize vitamin C.Cell1321039–104810.1016/j.cell.2008.01.042
34
NadimpalliR.YalpaniN.JohalG. S.SimmonsC. R. (2000). Prohibitins, stomatins, and plant disease response genes compose a protein superfamily that controls cell proliferation, ion channel regulation, and death.J. Biol. Chem.27529579–2958610.1074/jbc.M002339200
35
NijtmansL. G. J.de JongL.SanzM. A.CoatesP. J.BerdenJ. A.BackJ. W.et al. (2000). Prohibitins act as a membrane-bound chaperone for the stabilization of mitochondrial proteins.EMBO J.192444–245110.1093/emboj/19.11.2444
36
OsmanC.HaagM.PottingC.RodenfelsJ.DipP. V.WielandF. T.et al. (2009). The genetic interactome of prohibitins: coordinated control of cardiolipin and phosphatidylethanolamine by conserved regulators in mitochondria.J. Cell Biol.184583–59610.1083/jcb.200810189
37
PiechotaJ.KolodziejczakM.JuszczakI.SakamotoW.JanskaH. (2010). Identification and characterization of high molecular weight complexes formed by matrix AAA proteases and prohibitins in mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana.J. Biol. Chem.28512512–1252110.1074/jbc.M109.063644
38
PineauB.BourgeM.MarionJ.MauveC.GilardF.Maneta-PeyretL.et al. (2013). The importance of cardiolipin synthase for mitochondrial ultrastructure, respiratory function, plant development, and stress responses in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell254195–420810.1105/tpc.113.118018
39
PriceM. P.ThompsonR. J.EshcolJ. O.WemmieJ. A.BensonC. J. (2004). Stomatin modulates gating of acid-sensing ion channels.J. Biol. Chem.27953886–5389110.1074/jbc.M407708200
40
QiY. P.TsudaK.NguyenL. V.WangX.LinJ. S.MurphyA. S.et al. (2011). Physical association of Arabidopsis hypersensitive induced reaction proteins(HIRs) with the immune receptor RPS2.J. Biol. Chem.28631297–3130710.1074/jbc.M110.211615
41
ReifschneiderN. H.GotoS.NakamotoH.TakahashiR.SugawaM.DencherN. A.et al. (2006). Defining the mitochondrial proteomes from five rat organs in a physiologically significant context using 2D blue-native/SDS-PAGE.J. Proteome Res.51117–113210.1021/pr0504440
42
SchleicherM.ShepherdB. R.SuarezY.Fernandez-HernandoC.YuJ.PanY.et al. (2008). Prohibitin-1 maintains the angiogenic capacity of endothelial cells by regulating mitochondrial function and senescence.J. Cell Biol.180101–11210.1083/jcb.200706072
43
SteglichG.NeupertW.LangerT. (1999). Prohibitins regulate membrane protein degradation by the m-AAA protease in mitochondria.Mol.Cell. Biol.193435–3442.
44
StrubG. M.PaillardM.LiangJ.GomezL.AllegoodJ. C.HaitN. C.et al. (2010). Sphingosine-1-phosphate produced by sphingosine kinase 2 in mitochondria interacts with prohibitin 2 to regulate complex IV assembly and respiration.FASEB J.25600–61210.1096/fj.10-167502
45
TanY. F.O’TooleN.TaylorN. L.MillarA. H. (2010). Divalent metal ions in plant mitochondria and their role in interactions with proteins and oxidative stress-induced damage to respiratory function.Plant Physiol.152747–76110.1104/pp.109.147942
46
TatsutaT.ModelK.LangerT. (2005). Formation of membrane-bound ring complexes by prohibitins in mitochondria.Mol. Biol. Cell16248–25910.1091/mbc.E04-09-0807
47
TavernarakisN.DriscollM.KyrpidesN. C. (1999). The SPFH domain: implicated in regulating targeted protein turnover in stomatins and other membrane-associated proteins.Trends Biochem. Sci.24425–42710.1016/S0968-0004(99)01467-X
48
TonderaD.GrandemangeS.JourdainA.KarbowskiM.MattenbergerY.HerzigS.et al. (2009). SLP-2 is required for stress-induced mitochondrial hyperfusion.EMBO J.281589–160010.1038/emboj.2009.89
49
Van AkenO.PecenkovaT.van de CotteB.De RyckeR.EeckhoutD.FrommH.et al. (2007). Mitochondrial type-I prohibitins of Arabidopsis thaliana are required for supporting proficient meristem development.Plant J.52850–86410.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03276.x
50
Van AkenO.WhelanJVan BreusegemF. (2010). Prohibitins: mitochondrial partners in development and stress response.Trends Plant Sci.15275–28210.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.002
51
Van AkenO.ZhangB. T.CarrieC.UggallaV.PaynterE.GiraudE.et al. (2009). Defining the mitochondrial stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana.Mol. Plant21310–132410.1093/mp/ssp053
52
WangY.RiesA.WuK. T.YangA.CrawfordN. M. (2010). The Arabidopsis prohibitin gene PHB3 functions in nitric oxide-mediated responses and in hydrogen peroxide-induced nitric oxide accumulation.Plant Cell22249–25910.1105/tpc.109.072066
53
WhiteleggeJ. (2011). Up close with membrane lipid-protein complexes.Science334320–32110.1126/science.1214084
Summary
Keywords
plant mitochondria, respiratory chain, protein complexes, band-7 protein family, cardiolipin, microdomains
Citation
Gehl B and Sweetlove LJ (2014) Mitochondrial Band-7 family proteins: scaffolds for respiratory chain assembly?. Front. Plant Sci. 5:141. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00141
Received
31 January 2014
Accepted
24 March 2014
Published
08 April 2014
Volume
5 - 2014
Edited by
Daniel H. Gonzalez, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Argentina
Reviewed by
Olivier Van Aken, University of Western Australia, Australia; Hanna Janska, University of Wroclaw, Poland
Copyright
© 2014 Gehl and Sweetlove.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lee J. Sweetlove, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK e-mail: lee.sweetlove@plants.ox.ac.uk
This article was submitted to Plant Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.