<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.00141</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Redox Systemic Signaling and Induced Tolerance Responses During Soybean&#x2013;<italic>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</italic> Interaction: Involvement of Nod Factor Receptor and Autoregulation of Nodulation</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Fernandez-G&#x00F6;bel</surname> <given-names>Tadeo F.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/553202/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Deanna</surname> <given-names>Roc&#x00ED;o</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/599045/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mu&#x00F1;oz</surname> <given-names>Nacira B.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/343061/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>Germ&#x00E1;n</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/601422/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Asurmendi</surname> <given-names>Sebastian</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/414278/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Lascano</surname> <given-names>Ramiro</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/553432/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Instituto de Fisiolog&#x00ED;a y Recursos Gen&#x00E9;ticos Vegetales, Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Instituto Nacional de Tecnolog&#x00ED;a Agropecuaria</institution>, <addr-line>C&#x00F3;rdoba</addr-line>, <country>Argentina</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Departamento de Ciencias Farmac&#x00E9;uticas, Facultad de Ciencias Qu&#x00ED;micas, Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biolog&#x00ED;a Vegetal, Universidad Nacional de C&#x00F3;rdoba, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient&#x00ED;ficas y T&#x00E9;cnicas</institution>, <addr-line>C&#x00F3;rdoba</addr-line>, <country>Argentina</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>C&#x00E1;tedra de Fisiolog&#x00ED;a Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, F&#x00ED;sicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de C&#x00F3;rdoba</institution>, <addr-line>C&#x00F3;rdoba</addr-line>, <country>Argentina</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Instituto de Biotecnolog&#x00ED;a, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agron&#x00F3;micas, Instituto Nacional de Tecnolog&#x00ED;a Agropecuaria</institution>, <addr-line>Buenos Aires</addr-line>, <country>Argentina</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Jeremy Astier, INRA UMR1347 Agro&#x00E9;cologie, France</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Pascal Ratet, Institut des Sciences des Plantes de Paris Saclay (IPS2), France; Marc Libault, The University of Oklahoma, United States</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Ramiro Lascano, <email>hrlascano@hotmail.com</email>; <email>lascano.ramiro@conicet.gov.ar</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Microbe Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>141</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>17</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2018</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>28</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2019 Fernandez-G&#x00F6;bel, Deanna, Mu&#x00F1;oz, Robert, Asurmendi and Lascano.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Fernandez-G&#x00F6;bel, Deanna, Mu&#x00F1;oz, Robert, Asurmendi and Lascano</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The symbiotic relationship between legumes and nitrogen-fixing rhizobia induces local and systemic responses, which ultimately lead to nodule formation. The autoregulation of nodulation (AON) is a systemic mechanism related to innate immunity that controls nodule development and involves different components ranging from hormones, peptides, receptors to small RNAs. Here, we characterized a rapid systemic redox changes induced during soybean&#x2013;<italic>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</italic> symbiotic interaction. A transient peak of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation was found in soybean leaves after 30 min of root inoculation with <italic>B. japonicum</italic>. The ROS response was accompanied by changes in the redox state of glutathione and by activation of antioxidant enzymes. Moreover, the ROS peak and antioxidant enzyme activation were abolished in leaves by the addition, in either root or leaf, of DPI, an NADPH oxidase inhibitor. Likewise, these systemic redox changes primed the plant increasing its tolerance to photooxidative stress. With the use of non-nodulating <italic>nfr5</italic>-mutant and hyper-nodulating <italic>nark</italic>-mutant soybean plants, we subsequently studied the systemic redox changes. The <italic>nfr5-</italic>mutant lacked the systemic redox changes after inoculation, whereas the <italic>nark-</italic>mutant showed a similar redox systemic signaling than the <italic>wild type</italic> plants. However, neither <italic>nfr5-</italic> nor <italic>nark-</italic>mutant exhibited tolerance to photooxidative stress condition. Altogether, these results demonstrated that (i) the early redox systemic signaling during symbiotic interaction depends on a Nod factor receptor, and that (ii) the induced tolerance response depends on the AON mechanisms.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>systemic changes</kwd>
<kwd>redox signaling</kwd>
<kwd>rhizobia</kwd>
<kwd>soybean symbiosis</kwd>
<kwd>ISR/PGPR-like response</kwd>
<kwd>autoregulation of nodulation</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Instituto Nacional de Tecnolog&#x00ED;a Agropecuaria<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100010677</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="83"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
<word-count count="0"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p>The symbiotic interaction between legume plants and nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria has great importance at a basic, ecological and economic level and, the legume&#x2013;rhizobium symbiosis interaction is the most important in terms of the biological nitrogen fixation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Graham and Vance, 2003</xref>). Moreover, the legume&#x2013;rhizobium interaction could also induce PGPR like-responses, improving host plant growth and tolerance/resistance to abiotic/biotic stress conditions. In this sense, it has been postulated that the enhanced tolerance/resistance in inoculated plants is achieved by an ISR modulated by JA and ET (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Pieterse et al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Rhizobia have acquired the ability to evade the initial microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP) triggered immunity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Boller and Felix, 2009</xref>) by modulating the host immune response to avoid being recognized as a pathogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Zamioudis and Pieterse, 2012</xref>). In this regard, many biochemical, molecular and hormonal changes occur at local and systemic levels during the legume&#x2013;rhizobium interaction so that rhizobia coordinate the organogenesis of the nodule with infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Nadzieja et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>The species-specific interaction between rhizobia and their host plant is determined by nodulation (Nod) factors from rhizobia and the structure of the Nod-factor receptor (NFR) in the host. Nod factors are formed by a chitin backbone with an N-linked fatty acid moiety attached to the non-reducing terminal sugar and other modifications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Oldroyd and Downie, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Oldroyd et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Nitrogen availability and Nod factors are major local regulators. On the other hand, an innate immunity-related mechanism, called AON, is the systemic control of the nodulation process and involves long-distance root&#x2013;shoot&#x2013;root signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Caetano-Anolles and Gresshoff, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Ferguson et al., 2010</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2018</xref>). During AON, rhizobia trigger the synthesis of CLE peptides in the root (GmRIC1 and GmRIC2 in soybean) that move via xylem to the shoot, where they bind to a LRR receptor kinase, the nodulation autoregulation receptor kinase (NARK). This binding triggers the production of a SDI, which moves back to the roots and inhibits nodule formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Searle et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Okamoto et al., 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Ferguson et al., 2010</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Indrasumunar et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Reid et al., 2013</xref>). Although the chemical nature of SDI is not completely known, some evidence postulates CKs as putative SDI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Chen et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Sasaki et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Mens et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Reactive oxygen species were initially characterized as toxic by-products of aerobic metabolism. Nowadays, however, ROS are also considered signaling molecules involved in several signaling pathways in organisms from bacteria to mammal. Thus, the concept of oxidative stress moves toward oxidative or redox signaling. This dual role of ROS depends on its tight generation/scavenging ratio in different subcellular location. The ROS scavenging capacity of plants is supported by the well-known antioxidant system, which is composed by soluble antioxidants like ascorbate and glutathione as well as by enzymes like SODs, CATs, APXs, and GRs. This system forms a hub that acts as a cellular redox state buffering mechanism that regulates the cellular redox homeostasis. Changes of the cellular redox state provide important information and act on the sensing, signaling and response to internal or external stimuli (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Asada, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Foyer and Noctor, 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>The RBOH proteins or NADPH oxidase complex in plants are major sources of apoplastic ROS and key players in the oxidative or redox signaling. RBOH mediates cell-to-cell communication and long-distance signaling in response to different stress conditions. The long-distance or systemic signaling mediated by ROS travels at a rate similar to an electric signal, and is independent of ET, JA, or SA signaling. The systemic redox signaling participates in the regulation of systemic acclimatory mechanism to stress conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Miller et al., 2009</xref>). ROS and nitric oxide are involved in the systemic defense signals, either against pathogens or abiotic stress, as evidenced by their synthesis upon these stresses, and can be propagated over long distances through the phloem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Gaupels et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Local redox changes in root hairs and roots induced during different stages of the symbiotic interaction have also a key role in nodulation regulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Peleg-Grossman et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">C&#x00E1;rdenas et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Mu&#x00F1;oz et al., 2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2014b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Robert et al., 2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Arthikala et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, we analyzed the systemic redox changes during the <italic>Glycine max&#x2013;Bradyrhizobium japonicum</italic> interaction and their implications on ISR/PGPR-like response. In addition, we investigated the involvement of Nod factors perception and AON mechanisms in the ISR/PGPR-like response by performing experiments with non-nodulating <italic>nfr5-</italic> and hyper-nodulating <italic>nark</italic>-soybean mutants. Thus, the feature of AON as an autoimmunity mechanism as well as the involvement of the anti-senescence hormone CKs in the systemic control of nodule development led us to hypothesize that AON mechanisms are underlying the ISR/PGPR-like response induced during legume&#x2013;rhizobia symbiotic interaction.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec><title>Plant and Bacterial Growth Conditions</title>
<p><italic>Glycine max</italic> (L.) Merr. <italic>cv.</italic> Bragg <italic>wild type (wt), nts1007</italic> (hyper nodulating <italic>nark-</italic>mutant) and <italic>nod139</italic> (non-nodulating <italic>nfr5-</italic>mutant) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Carroll et al., 1985</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1986</xref>) were used in this work. Seeds were surface-disinfected for 10 min in sodium hypochlorite 5% (v/v) and washed successively with distilled water. The seeds were germinated on filter paper moistened with distilled water in a chamber at 28&#x00B0;C in the dark for 3 days. Then, seedlings were placed in aerated plastic trays with B&#x0026;D solution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Broughton and Dilworth, 1971</xref>) supplemented with 0.625 mM KNO<sub>3</sub> and 0.313 mM Ca(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (1,25 mM of total nitrogen concentration). The B&#x0026;D solution was replaced every 7 days. Soybean plants were grown in a growth chamber under 16 h photoperiod (250 &#x03BC;mol m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>) at 26 &#x00B1; 2&#x00B0;C.</p>
<p><italic>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</italic> USDA 138 strain was cultured in yeast extract mannitol (YEM) medium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Vincent, 1971</xref>) at 28&#x00B0;C with constant agitation (180 rpm) for 5 days. For the treatments, the bacteria were washed and resuspended in sterile water (OD<sub>600</sub> = 0.8).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Treatments Conditions</title>
<p>The root of 12-days-old soybean plants were inoculated with 2.5 mL of washed <italic>B. japonicum</italic> USDA 138 strain (OD<sub>600</sub> = 0.8) per liter of hydroponic medium. The first trifoliate leaf was collected at different times post-inoculation and immediately frozen or used for measurement.</p>
<p>For the DPI treatments, an NADPH-oxidase inhibitor (50 &#x03BC;M), was added 30 min before inoculating <italic>B. japonicum</italic> to either the root or leaf according to the experiment. The inhibitor was added to the hydroponic medium for the root application or sprinkled locally in the first trifoliate leaf. DPI application does not affect the normal growth of <italic>B. japonicum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Mu&#x00F1;oz et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>For the photooxidative stress treatment, the first trifoliate leaf of 12-days-old inoculated and non-inoculated (control) plants were treated with 1,1&#x2032;-dimethyl-4, 4&#x2032;-bipyridinium dichloride (PQ). PQ is a viologen that acts at the photosystem I level by intercepting the electrons that are going from ferredoxin to NADP+, thus enhancing chloroplastic ROS generation and inhibiting ascorbate regeneration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Asada, 1999</xref>). The leaves were splashed uniformly with 20 &#x03BC;M of PQ and 0.01% Tween 20 at 24 and 48 hpi and physiological parameters were measured after 24 h of PQ treatments. PQ was replaced by water in control treatments.</p>
<p>Purified Nod factors and chitosan treatments were performed in the same way than <italic>B. japonicum</italic> inoculation, in the hydroponic medium. Chitosan is a fungal elicitor.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Apoplastic Superoxide Radical (O<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>) and Hydrogen Peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) Production in Leaves</title>
<p>Superoxide levels were determined histochemically with nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) staining, which reacts with superoxide radicals to produce a blue formazan precipitate. Leaves were incubated in 0.01% (w/v) NBT solution in 25 mM K-Hepes buffer (pH 7.6) in the darkness at 28&#x00B0;C for 2 h. Color images were transformed in invert 8-bit images and gray value intensity of the blue stain was quantified using the ImageJ software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Schneider et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> generation was histochemically determined with 3,3&#x2032;-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining. The leaves were incubated in 0.02% (w/v) DAB solution in 50 mM Tris acetate buffer (pH 5) and incubated in the darkness at 28&#x00B0;C for 2 h. Color images were transformed into invert 8-bit images and gray value intensity of the DAB stain was quantified using Optimas 6 (Optimas Corporation, Bothell, WA, United States). Total optical density (OD) was calculated as log inverse gray value of pixels within an area boundary relative to the analyzed area.</p>
<p>Hydrogen peroxide was also estimated in leaf extracts as previously described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Guilbault et al. (1968)</xref>. A blank with CAT was included for each sample. Frozen leaf samples were ground to a fine powder with liquid nitrogen and homogenized 1/10 (w/v) in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), containing 1 mM EDTA and 1% polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP). Homogenates were centrifuged at 16,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> at 4&#x00B0;C for 25 min and the supernatant was used to determine protein and hydrogen peroxide concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Glutathione and Ascorbate Content</title>
<p>The glutathione and ascorbate content in soybean leaves were determined as previously described by our group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Rodr&#x00ED;guez et al., 2010</xref>). Leaf samples were homogenized (100 mg of fresh weight material) in 1 mL of cold 3% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and 100 mg PVPP. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> at 4&#x00B0;C for 15 min and the supernatant was collected to for analyze of glutathione and ascorbate content.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Antioxidant Enzymatic Activities</title>
<p>Superoxide dismutase activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 560 nm, as previously described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Casano et al. (1997)</xref>. GR activity was assayed following the decrease at A340 nm because of NADPH oxidation, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Schaedle and Bassham (1977)</xref>. CAT activity was determined by measuring the decrease at 240 nm because of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Gallego et al., 1996</xref>). APX activity was measured according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Nakano and Asada (1981)</xref> by measuring the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>-dependent oxidation of ascorbate at 290 nm (the extract medium for this enzyme contained 5 mM ascorbate).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Total Protein Content</title>
<p>Soluble proteins were estimated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bradford (1976)</xref>. Bovine serum albumin was used as a standard for calibration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Chlorophyll Content</title>
<p>The Chlorophyll content of the first trifoliate leaf was estimated using a handheld SPAD CL01 meter (Hansatech Instruments, Pentney King&#x2019;s Lynn, United Kingdom). The results are expressed as unitless parameter (SPAD units, 0 to 100), which is proportional to leaf chlorophyll.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthesis</title>
<p>Quantum efficiency of PSII photochemistry under ambient light conditions (250 &#x03BC;mol photon m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>, 25 &#x00B1; 2&#x00B0;C) (&#x03A6;PSII) was measured using a pulse amplitude modulated fluorometer (FMS2, Hansatech Instruments, Pentney King&#x2019;s Lynn, United Kingdom). <italic>F</italic><sub>v</sub>/<italic>F</italic><sub>m</sub> ratio was calculated using (<italic>F</italic><sub>m</sub> -<italic>F</italic><sub>0</sub>)/<italic>F</italic><sub>m</sub>, where <italic>F</italic><sub>m</sub> is maximal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted state and <italic>F</italic><sub>0</sub> is minimum fluorescence yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Maxwell and Johnson, 2000</xref>).</p>
<p>Photosynthesis was determined using a portable infrared gas analyzer (Li-COR-6400, United States). Leaf chamber setting parameters were: LED light source of 800 &#x03BC;mol. m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>, leaf temperature 25&#x2013;26&#x00B0;C, CO<sub>2</sub> concentration of 400 &#x03BC;mol. mol<sup>-1</sup> and 500 flow.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Performance Index</title>
<p>The performance index, is an indicator of leaf vitality, the measurements were performed with the Pocket PEA chlorophyll fluorimeter (Hansatech Instruments, Pentney King&#x2019;s Lynn, United Kingdom).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Total Antioxidant Capacity (FRAP), Malondialdehyde Content (MDA), Chlorophylls, and Sugars</title>
<p>The samples were homogenized using a mortar and pestle under liquid nitrogen and adding 80% EtOH. Then, centrifugation was carried out at 12,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic>, 4&#x00B0;C during 10 min. This extracts were used to measure FRAP, lipid peroxidation (MDA content), chlorophylls and sugars.</p>
<p>For FRAP determination, 5 &#x03BC;L of supernatant was diluted 20 times with 80% EtOH and mixed with 100 &#x03BC;L reaction buffer (5 mL of acetate buffer 0.3 M pH 3.6; 0.5 mL of TPTZ 10 mM (2,4, 6 Tris (2 pyridyl) s-triazine) diluted in 40 mM HCl and 0.5 mL of FeCl<sub>3</sub> 200 mM). This mixture was left to stand for 20 min at room temperature to react and the reaction was subsequently measured at 593 nm. TROLOX was used as a standard to calculate FRAP capacity of the samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Benzie and Strain, 1996</xref>).</p>
<p>Malondialdehyde levels were quantified according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Heath and Packer (1968)</xref>. Briefly, 200 &#x03BC;L of each sample was mixed with 200 &#x03BC;L of 20% TCA + 0.5% TBA, incubated at 80&#x00B0;C for 20 min and immediately cooled in ice. The mix was centrifuged at 13,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 10 min and the absorbance of the supernatant was read at 532 nm and 600 nm.</p>
<p>Chlorophylls were calculated by spectrofluorometry at 654 nm in a reaction with 50 &#x03BC;L of extract and 450 &#x03BC;L of EtOH.</p>
<p>Sugars were determine in a reaction of 5 &#x03BC;L of each extract with 45 &#x03BC;L of EtOH and 150 &#x03BC;L of antrone that was incubated 20 min at 4&#x00B0;C, 30 min at 80&#x00B0;C and 20 min at 25&#x00B0;C. The reactions were subsequently measured at 620 nm. Glucose was used to calibrate a standard curve.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase Activity (PAL)</title>
<p>The PAL activity was measure according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Beaudoin-Eagan and Thorpe (1985)</xref>. The enzyme activity was expressed in nmol of <italic>trans</italic>-cinnamic acid.mg protein<sup>-1</sup>.min<sup>-1</sup>, where 1 U is defined as 1 nmol <italic>trans</italic>-cinnamic acid.mg protein<sup>-1</sup>.min<sup>-1</sup>. 300 mg of leaf samples were homogenized in 3 mL of Tris-HCl buffer 50 mM pH 8.5 with 2-mercaptoethanol 14.4 mM and 100 mg PVPP, and centrifuged at 6,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 10 min at 4&#x00B0;C. The supernatant were passed through a column of celite and centrifuged at 10,000 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 15 min at 4&#x00B0;C. Total protein concentration was determined using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bradford (1976)</xref> assay.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Hormone Identification and Quantification by Liquid Chromatography Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-ESI/MS-MS)</title>
<p>Phytohormones were extracted from 200 g of dry weight leaf as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Durgbanshi et al., 2005</xref>) with some modifications. Plant material was homogenized in an ultraturrax T25 basic homogenizer (IKA, Staufen; Germany) with 5 mL deionized water. D2-SA and D6-JA (Leibniz- Institute of Plant Biochemistry; Halle, Germany) were used as internal standards. A total of 50 ng of each standard was added to the samples. The samples were centrifuged at 1,540 &#x00D7; <italic>g</italic> for 15 min and the supernatant was adjusted to pH 2.8 with 15% (v/v) acetic acid and extracted twice with diethyl ether. The organic fraction was evaporated under vacuum. Dried extracts were dissolved in 1 mL methanol and filtered on a vacuum manifold at a flow rate below 1 mL.min<sup>-1</sup>. The eluate was evaporated at 35&#x00B0;C under vacuum in SpeedVac SC110 (Savant Instruments; New York, NY, United States). Four biological replicates were used for the assays.</p>
<p>Hormones were separated from samples using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). An Alliance 2695 separation module (Waters; Milford, MA, United States) equipped with a Resteck Ultra C18 column (100 &#x00D7; 2.1 mm, 3 &#x03BC;m) was used to maintain performance of the analytical column. Fractions were separated using a gradient of increasing methanol concentration, constant glacial acetic acid concentration (0.2% in water), and an initial flow rate of 0.2 mL min<sup>-1</sup>. The gradient was increased linearly from 40% methanol/60% water-acetic acid at 25 min to 80% methanol/20% water-acetic acid. After 1 min, the initial conditions were restored, and the system was allowed to equilibrate for 7 min. Hormones were identified and quantified using a quadruple tandem mass spectrometer (Quattro Ultima, Micromass; Manchester, United Kingdom) fitted with an electrospray ion (ESI) source, in multiple reactions monitoring mode (MRM). This assay was performed using precursor ions and their transitions (m/z) to SA (m/z 137/93), D2-SA (m/z 141/97) and JA (m/z 209/59), D6-JA (m/z 215/59) with retention times of 4.35 and 14.30 min, respectively. Collision energies used were 20 eV for both and the cone voltage was 35 V. The analyses were accomplished using MassLynk version 4.1 (Micromass).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Ethylene Content by Gas Chromatography</title>
<p>Prior to <italic>B. japonicum</italic> inoculation, 12-days-old plants were transferred to 580 cm<sup>3</sup> glass jars containing 100 mL of B&#x0026;D solution. Three plants per bottle were placed and inoculated with <italic>B. japonicum.</italic> The containers were sealed to prevent the loss of gaseous hormone. Subsequently, samples were taken through syringes of 10 mL 30 min post inoculation, and subsequently conserved in sealed 10 cm<sup>3</sup> vial tubes at 4&#x00B0;C until quantification.</p>
<p>Ethylene content was determined by gas chromatography according to adaptations of the methodology described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Hardy et al. (1968)</xref>. Briefly, 1 mL of air sample was injected and quantification was carried out for 2 min in a Hewlett Packard Series II 5890 gas chromatograph by determining the ET peak between the retention times of 1.4 and 1.55 min.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>Three independent experiments with their corresponding number of replicates for each case were performed in different dates. All data are presented as the mean &#x00B1; standard error (SE). Comparisons between different treatments were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey tests using InfoStatTM Software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Di Rienzo et al., 2016</xref>). The results were considered significant when <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05.</p>
<p>A multivariate statistical analysis was performed using a principal component analysis (PCA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Johnson and Wichern, 2006</xref>) to explore associations between genotypes/treatments and the set of physiological variables.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<sec><title>NADPH Oxidase-Dependent Systemic Redox Changes Are Induced in Soybean Leaves After Root Inoculation With <italic>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</italic></title>
<p>As mentioned above, the establishment of the symbiotic relationship between legumes and rhizobia depends on both local and systemic complex signaling pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Ferguson et al., 2018</xref>). In this regard, although the participation of local ROS signaling in roots after symbiont perception has been widely studied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">C&#x00E1;rdenas et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Mu&#x00F1;oz et al., 2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2014a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Damiani et al., 2016</xref>), much less is known about the ROS systemic production during the legume&#x2013;rhizobium interaction. We evaluated histochemically the systemic ROS (O<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) generation in leaves after 30, 60, 120 and 240 min of root inoculation with <italic>B. japonicum</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A,B</xref>). The pictures of the stained leaves were transformed in numeric values using image processing software as described in &#x201C;Materials and Methods.&#x201D; Besides, the content of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in leaves was also quantified by spectrofluorometer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>). Interestingly, the H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> generation were differentially modulated in leaves after root inoculation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The inoculated plants displayed H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> generation from 30 to 120 min after root inoculation and the levels were higher than those of the control plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A,C</xref>). However, these levels decreased after 240 min post inoculation even below the levels of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> observed in the control plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Systemic ROS generation is induced after root inoculation with <italic>B. japonicum</italic>. Leaves of non-inoculated (control, C) and inoculated (I) plants were sampled at different times after root inoculation (nd represent times not determined), and incubated with <bold>(A)</bold> 3,3&#x2032;-diaminobenzidine (DAB) or <bold>(B)</bold> NBT for H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> staining, respectively. The pictures of the stained leaves were transformed into 8-bit images and the gray value intensity (O.D.) was quantified by image processing software. Results are the means of three independent experiments (four leaves per treatment). Data are means &#x00B1; SE. Asterisks indicate significant difference between control and inoculated treatments (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test). <bold>(C)</bold> H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> quantification by spectrofluorometer. The results are the means of three independent experiments (six leaves per treatment). Data are means &#x00B1; SE. Asterisks indicate significant difference between control and inoculated treatments (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00141-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In the case of O<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>, a transient peak of O<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> generation was induced at 30 min post inoculation, whereas no differences were observed in the later times with respect to the non-inoculated control plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>). Moreover, this systemic and transient response was specific for <italic>B. japonicum</italic>. Indeed, the addition of purified Nod factors to the roots induced a transient systemic ROS induction, whereas treatments with chitosan, a fungal elicitor, induced a sustained systemic ROS induction (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>).</p>
<p>In order to further characterize the cellular redox state changes in leaves after root inoculation, the content of ascorbic acid, glutathione, MDA and the activities of SOD, GR, CAT, and APX were measured (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Systemic redox changes are observed after root inoculation with <italic>B. japonicum</italic>. Leaves of non-inoculated (control, C) and inoculated (I) plants were sampled at different times after root inoculation and <bold>(A)</bold> total ascorbic acid, and <bold>(D)</bold> glutathione levels were measured. The reduced/total ratio of <bold>(B)</bold> ascorbic acid, and <bold>(E)</bold> glutathione was calculated. MDA content <bold>(C)</bold> was quantified. Data are means &#x00B1; SE of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant difference between control and inoculated treatments (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00141-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>NADPH oxidase complex modulates the systemic redox changes after root inoculation with <italic>B. japonicum</italic>. Leaves or roots of 12-days-old soybean plants were pretreated 30 min with 50 &#x03BC;M DPI (+DPI) or DMSO (&#x2013;DPI), and then roots were inoculated with <italic>B. japonicum</italic>. After 30 min of root inoculation, leaves of non-inoculated (control, C) and inoculated (I) plants were sampled and incubated with <bold>(A)</bold> 3,3&#x2032;-diaminobenzidine (DAB) for H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> quantification. The results are expressed relative to non-inoculated plants (assigned a value of 1). DAB precipitated in leaves was measured and transformed into optical density (OD) by the image processing software Optimas<sup>&#x00AE;</sup>. The results are the means of three independent experiments (four leaves per treatment). Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test). SOD <bold>(B)</bold>, GR <bold>(C)</bold>, CAT <bold>(D)</bold> and APX <bold>(E)</bold> activities were measured 30 min post inoculation in leaves of plants whose roots were pretreated with DPI (+DPI) or DMSO (&#x2013;DPI). Data are means &#x00B1; SE of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant difference between control and inoculated treatments (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00141-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The total ascorbic acid content increased in leaves only at 30 min post inoculation compared to leaves of non-inoculated plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). No significant differences were observed in the ascorbic acid redox state (reduced/total ratio) at any of the evaluated times (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). On the other hand, total glutathione content in leaves remained unaltered with the inoculation. The glutathione redox state (reduced/total ratio), however, decreased at 30 min in leaves of inoculated plants compared with control plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2D,E</xref>). Likewise, the content of MDA, which is an intermediary metabolite of lipid peroxidation used as an oxidative stress marker, significantly increased in leaves of inoculated plants after 30 min of root inoculation thereby correlating with ROS induction (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>).</p>
<p>NADPH oxidase complex plays important roles in local signaling during symbiotic interaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Peleg-Grossman et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">C&#x00E1;rdenas et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Montiel et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Mu&#x00F1;oz et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Robert et al., 2018</xref>) as well as in systemic signaling triggered by wounding, heat, cold, high-intensity light, and salinity stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Miller et al., 2009</xref>). To investigate the participation of this complex during the systemic ROS induction in leaves after root inoculation, we pretreated the roots or leaves with 50 &#x03BC;M DPI, a well-known inhibitor of flavoprotein enzymes that is extensively used as an NADPH oxidase inhibitor (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). Interestingly, the induced systemic ROS generation observed in leaves of inoculated plants was completely abolished when DPI was applied in leaf, and a partial inhibited when DPI was applied in root (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). Moreover, this inhibitor completely abolished the induction of SOD, GR, and CAT activities observed in leaves 30 min post inoculation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">D</xref>). Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed in the APX activity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3E</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition, JA, SA, and ET levels remained apparently unaltered in leaves 30 min after root inoculation with <italic>B. japonicum</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Systemic ROS generation precedes to systemic hormonal changes after root inoculation with <italic>B. japonicum</italic>. Jasmonic acid <bold>(A)</bold>, salicylic acid <bold>(B)</bold>, and ethylene <bold>(C)</bold> were quantified 30 min after root inoculation from leaves of non-inoculated (control, C) and inoculated (I) plants. Data are the means of four leaves &#x00B1; SE for jasmonic acid and salicylic acid, and seven leaves for ethylene of three independent experiments. No significant differences were observed between control and inoculated plants (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00141-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>NFR5-Dependent Systemic ROS Induction After Root Inoculation</title>
<p>To further study the systemic redox changes induced during the soybean&#x2013;<italic>B. japonicum</italic> interaction, we analyzed ROS generation in leaves of non-nodulating <italic>nfr5-</italic>mutant and hyper-nodulating <italic>nark</italic>-mutant soybean plants after 30 min of root inoculation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). The leaves of <italic>nark-</italic>mutants showed a systemic ROS induction in response to <italic>B. japonicum</italic> inoculation similarly to that of the <italic>wt</italic> soybean plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). However, neither the systemic generation of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> nor O<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> were induced in leaves of <italic>nfr5-</italic>mutant soybean plants 30 min post inoculation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>The systemic ROS induction after <italic>B. japonicum</italic> inoculation depends on NFR5 signaling pathways. Roots of 12-days-old <italic>nfr5</italic> and <italic>nark</italic>-soybean mutant plants or <italic>wt</italic> plants were inoculated with <italic>B. japonicum</italic> (I), and the first trifoliate leaf was sampled after 30 min and incubated with <bold>(A)</bold> nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) or <bold>(B)</bold> 3,3&#x2032;-diaminobenzidine (DAB) for O<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup> and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> staining, respectively. Non-inoculated plants were used as control (C). Upper panels, NBT and DAB stained leaves; lower panels, NBT and DAB quantification. The pictures of the stained leaves were transformed into 8-bit images and the gray value intensity (O.D.) was quantified with image processing software. The results are the means of three independent experiments (four leaves per treatment). Data are means &#x00B1; SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences between control and inoculated plants (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00141-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>From Root to Shoot: Root Inoculation Induced Systemic Tolerance to Photooxidative Stress</title>
<p>The legume&#x2013;rhizobium symbiotic interaction can mediate an increased tolerance to abiotic stresses in host plants by an ISR modulated by JA and ET (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Dimkpa et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Pieterse et al., 2014</xref>). Furthermore, genetic and cell biological evidences revealed the role of ROS as a second messenger during the plant responses to the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Miller et al., 2007</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Melchiorre et al., 2009</xref>). In this regard, the NADPH oxidase complex not only initiates ROS production but also amplifies them (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Foreman et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Torres and Dangl, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Miller et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Robert et al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>Stress conditions, in general, are associated with increases in the ROS production, mainly in the chloroplasts, which ultimately leads to photooxidative stress. In order to evaluate the systemic beneficial effects of the symbiotic interaction, the tolerance of non-inoculated and inoculated plants to PQ treatments, an herbicide that increase the chloroplasts ROS production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Lascano et al., 2003</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Melchiorre et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Robert et al., 2009</xref>), were evaluated. The first trifoliate leaf of non-inoculated and inoculated plants was treated with PQ at 24 and 48 h post inoculation. The selected physiological parameters related to photosynthesis to be assessed after 24 h of PQ application were SPAD, PSII, and <italic>F</italic><sub>v</sub>/<italic>F</italic><sub>m</sub> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure S2</xref>). Under control conditions (without PQ), no significant differences were observed between non-inoculated and inoculated plants (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS3">Supplementary Figure S3</xref>). Likewise, no significant differences were observed between non-inoculated and inoculated plants treated with PQ at 24 h after root inoculation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). However, the leaves of inoculated plants were more tolerant than leaves of non-inoculated plants when PQ was applied after 48 h of root inoculation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p>Root inoculation induced photooxidative stress tolerance in leaves. Paraquat (PQ; 20 &#x03BC;M) was sprayed in the first trifoliate leaf of inoculated plants after 24 and 48 h of root inoculation with <italic>B. japonicum</italic> (I +PQ). Non-inoculated plants were used as a control (C +PQ) and without PQ (C &#x2013;PQ). The chlorophyll content (SPAD) <bold>(A)</bold>, quantum efficiently of the PSII (&#x03A6;PSII) <bold>(B)</bold>, and maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II (<italic>F</italic><sub>v</sub>/<italic>F</italic><sub>m</sub>) <bold>(C)</bold> were analyzed 24 h after PQ treatment. The results are the means of three independent experiments (nine leaves per treatment). Data are means &#x00B1; SE. Different Latin and Greek letters indicate significant differences between treatments after 24 and 48 h post inoculation, respectively (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00141-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>ISR/PGPR-Like Response: Participation of Nod-Factors and AON-Signaling Pathways?</title>
<p>To evaluate the involvement of Nod-factors and AON signaling in an ISR/PGPR-like response induced during soybean&#x2013;<italic>B. japonicum</italic> interaction, <italic>nrf5</italic>- and <italic>nark</italic>-mutant soybean plants were used. Leaves of mutant and <italic>wt</italic> plants were treated with PQ 48 h after root inoculation, and then diverse physiological&#x2013;biochemical parameters were assessed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). The performance index is an integrative and sensitive parameter that gives quantitative information on the plant performance reflecting the functionality of both photosystems I and II (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Strasser et al., 2000</xref>). After PQ treatments, leaves of <italic>wt</italic> inoculated plants showed an increase in the performance index in comparison to leaves of non-inoculated <italic>wt</italic> plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7A</xref>). However, the leaves of inoculated and non-inoculated <italic>nfr5-</italic>mutant plants showed no significant differences after this treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7A</xref>). Curiously, the <italic>nark-</italic>mutant plants showed a lower tolerance upon inoculation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7A</xref>). Furthermore, the photosynthesis rates were significantly lower in <italic>wt</italic> non-inoculated with respect to <italic>wt</italic> inoculated plants, whereas no effect of inoculation was observed in leaves of <italic>nfr5-</italic> and <italic>nark-</italic>soybean mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7B</xref>). In a PCA performed to identify associations between physiological&#x2013;biochemical parameters and the different plant genotypes under photooxidative stress treatments, the first two principal components (PC 1 and PC 2) of the analysis explained 85.1% of total variability in the data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7C</xref>). In a PCA, the cosine of the angle between two parameter vectors approximates the association among the parameters, with acute and obtuse angles indicating positive and negative correlations, respectively, and right angles denoting no correlation between parameters. The PC1 of the biplot indicated that SPAD, performance index, <italic>F</italic><sub>v</sub>/<italic>F</italic><sub>m</sub>, photosynthesis, stomatic conductance and FRAP were positively associated and these vectors were oriented toward <italic>wt</italic>-inoculated plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7C</xref>). Interestingly, control and inoculated <italic>nfr5</italic>- and <italic>nark</italic>-mutant genotypes were located closed to non-inoculated <italic>wt</italic> plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7C</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption><p>The induced-photooxidative stress tolerance in leaves after <italic>B. japonicum</italic> inoculation depends on Nod factors- and AON-signaling pathways. The first trifoliate leaf of 12-days-old <italic>nfr5</italic>- and <italic>nark</italic>-mutant soybean plants and <italic>wild type</italic> (<italic>wt</italic>) plants were sprayed with 20 &#x03BC;M paraquat (PQ) after 48 h of root inoculation with <italic>B. japonicum</italic> (I). Non-inoculated plants were used as a control (C). The chlorophyll content, SPAD, maximum quantum efficiency of Photosystem II (<italic>F</italic><sub>v</sub>/<italic>F</italic><sub>m</sub>), sugars and MDA content, photosynthesis, stomatic conductance, performance index and the ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) were analyzed 24 h after PQ treatment. <bold>(A)</bold> Performance index (PI) was set as an indicator of the overall fitness of the photosynthetic apparatus. <bold>(B)</bold> Net photosynthesis. Data are means &#x00B1; SE of nine leaves of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences between control and inoculated plants (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test). <bold>(C)</bold> Biplot from the first and second principal components (PC1 and PC2) of principal components analysis (PCA) showing relationships between inoculated <italic>wt</italic> plants and SPAD; Performance Index; <italic>F</italic><sub>v</sub>/<italic>F</italic><sub>m</sub>; Photosynthesis; Stomatic conductance and FRAP.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00141-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity, a key enzyme of the phenylpropanoid pathway and another ISR marker, was evaluated. The analysis of PAL activity revealed that this activity was induced in leaves of <italic>wt</italic> inoculated plants as compared to <italic>wt</italic> non-inoculated, while no significant differences were observed between non-inoculated and inoculated <italic>nfr5-</italic> and <italic>nark-</italic>mutant plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption><p>Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) is induced under photooxidative stress conditions in <italic>wild type</italic> (<italic>wt</italic>) inoculated plants. The first trifoliate leaf of 12-days-old <italic>nfr5</italic>- and <italic>nark</italic>-mutant soybean plants and <italic>wt</italic> plants was sprayed with 20 &#x03BC;M paraquat (PQ) after 48 h of root inoculation with <italic>B. japonicum</italic> (I), non-inoculated plants were used as a control (C). PAL activity was measured in the first trifoliate leaves after 24 h of PQ treatment. Data are means &#x00B1; SE of three leaves of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate significant differences between comparisons (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00141-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Likewise, to analyze the participation of hormones related to ISR or AON, we assessed the levels of JA and SA in leaves after 72 h of root inoculation (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS4">Supplementary Figure S4</xref>). The content of these hormones was similar among treatments and genotypes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS4">Supplementary Figure S4</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Discussion</title>
<p>The relationships between plants and microorganisms are active, co-evolutionary processes that can result in incompatible or compatible interactions. The great majority of microorganisms are not able to invade and establish compatible interaction with plants, whereas a few species have developed strategies to establish a compatible interaction ranging from mutualistic (symbiotic) to pathogenic interactions. Plants recognize different signal molecules from microorganisms, like MAMPs and other pathogenic and symbiotic signals that modulate the immune system of plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Limpens et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Couto and Zipfel, 2016</xref>). The ligand molecules, receptors and the downstream signaling pathways involved in plant&#x2013;microorganism interaction have been deeply characterized in the last 10 years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Zipfel and Oldroyd, 2017</xref>). In this sense, the species-specific legume rhizobium symbiotic interactions and race-specific plant pathogen interactions share many similarities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cao et al., 2017</xref>). MAMPs and symbiotic signals are recognized by cell-surface receptor kinases, which are composed by an extracellular domain involved in ligand perception, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular kinase domain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Gourion et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Miwa and Okazaki, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Masson-Boivin and Sachs, 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Legume rhizobium symbiotic interactions are orchestrated by a fine-tuning molecular dialog. Initially, the recognition of both Nod factors and MAMPs involves different cellular events, including increases of ROS production and cytosolic calcium concentration. Previously, we characterized the local redox changes and calcium involvement in root hairs during soybean&#x2013;<italic>B. japonicum</italic> symbiotic interaction under control, abiotic and biotic stress conditions. A specific symbiotic calcium-dependent ROS signature occurred during the early events of soybean&#x2013;<italic>B. japonicum</italic> symbiosis, which was completely different to ROS signature induced by pathogen elicitors or by abiotic stressful condition during the symbiotic interaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Mu&#x00F1;oz et al., 2012</xref>). Under moderate short-term salt stress (50 mM NaCl) treatment, <italic>B. japonicum</italic> could be sensed as a pathogen and its sensing may induce root hair cell death by a hypersensitive-like response and therefore may inhibit the nodulation process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Mu&#x00F1;oz et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Robert et al., 2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">2018</xref>). Interestingly, the addition of calcium partially rescued the root hair death and inhibition of nodulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Mu&#x00F1;oz et al., 2014a</xref>). These results are in line with recent study that showed close similarities between symbiotic an immune pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Zipfel and Oldroyd, 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition to generating local responses in roots, plant microorganism interactions also induce systemic responses that prepare the whole plant to upcoming challenges. SAR and ISR are the most studied systemic responses triggered by pathogen or beneficial microorganism, respectively. These systemic responses are mainly modulated by SA, for SAR, and JA and ET, for ISR. On the other hand, SAA is a systemic response triggered by abiotic stress conditions that provoke excess excitation energy, where chloroplastic and apoplastic ROS production play a key role.</p>
<p>Even when some evidence demonstrates the role of ROS as systemic signals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Miller et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Gilroy et al., 2014</xref>), this aspect has not been investigated in legume&#x2013;rhizobium interaction. The initial aim of the present work was to characterize the systemic redox changes induced during the soybean&#x2013;<italic>B. japonicum</italic> symbiotic interaction and to assess their relationship with ISR/PGPR-like response. Our results showed that soybean&#x2013;<italic>B. japonicum</italic> interaction induces a rapid redox systemic changes given by a transient peak of ROS at 30 min post inoculation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Furthermore, this interaction produces changes in the total content of ascorbate, glutathione redox state as well as higher MDA content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>), and higher antioxidant enzymes activity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). Ascorbate-glutathione-NADPH and the interconnected antioxidant enzymes of the Asada&#x2013;Halliwell cycle are key components of the redox hub that controls the cellular redox state. Perturbations of this redox buffering mechanism trigger redox signaling pathways, where even the oxidative damage could be also part of the oxidative or redox signaling, explaining the dual role of ROS as toxic and signal molecules. Ascorbate and glutathione are the major soluble antioxidants. The redox potential among NADPH, glutathione and ascorbate, where glutathione has middle values between NADPH and ascorbate could explain why we found changes in the redox state only in glutathione pool. Moreover, many evidences indicate that conditions with enhanced ROS production has less impact on the ascorbate redox state pool than on glutathione pool, generating altered cellular redox state characterized by a highly reduced state of the ascorbate pool and partially oxidized state of the glutathione pool. Changes in the glutathione redox state have been previously characterized in oxidative signaling processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Kranner et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Foyer and Noctor, 2011</xref>). The cellular redox state, mainly determined by the ratio between generation and scavenging capacity of ROS in different subcellular compartments, is an integral source of information for the plant cell that modulates growth, development and different responses to environmental conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Foyer and Noctor, 2011</xref>). Recently, systemically auto propagating waves of ROS, calcium and electric signals has been integrated in a model for rapid systemic cell-to-cell communication in plants that is involved in the acclimation to abiotic stress condition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Choi et al., 2017</xref>). In this regard, the NADPH oxidase complex (RBOH respiratory burst homolog protein) plays a key role within this model. The RBOH proteins are localized on the plasma membrane and generate superoxide radical in the apoplast, which quickly dismutates to hydrogen peroxide spontaneously or by SOD activity.</p>
<p>Our results also showed that the inhibitor of NADPH oxidase complex, DPI, abolished the systemic redox changes induced during the soybean&#x2013;<italic>B. japonicum</italic> symbiotic interaction, indicating the involvement of this complex in the systemic redox signaling (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
<p>As it was mentioned above, ROS and redox changes could act as priming molecules and thus improve the responses to different stress conditions. In line with this, inoculated soybean plants were more tolerant to a photooxidative stress condition induced by PQ treatments. This finding indicates that <italic>B. japonicum</italic> inoculation could prime soybean plants by inducing ISR/PGPR-like response through redox changes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption><p>Proposed model for the ISR/PGPR-like response induced during <italic>B. japonicum</italic>&#x2013;soybean interaction. Red arrows and circles indicate the already described signaling pathway involved in AON. Green arrows and circles indicate the proposed signaling pathways arising from this research. In <italic>wt</italic> plants, rhizobia-induced CLE peptides (RIC1 and RIC2) are produced in root after NFR5-dependent symbiont perception. Then, CLE peptides are transported via xylem to shoot, where they bind to GmNARK triggering the production of the SDI, which moves back to the roots and inhibits nodule formation (red arrows and circles). A potential role for the systemic ROS production in the AON mechanism as well as in the ISR/PGPR-like response is proposed. In this sense, cytokinins play a dual role, participating in the mechanism involved in AON and in the ISR/PGPR-like response (green arrows and circles). AON, autoregulation of nodulation; CKs, cytokinins; GmNARK, <italic>Glycine max</italic> nodulation autoregulation receptor kinase; ISR, induced systemic resistance; NF, Nod factors; NFR5, Nod factor receptor 5; PGPR, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RIC, rhizobia-induced CLE peptides; SDI, shoot-derived inhibitor.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00141-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To further investigate the specificity of the systemic response and its role in the ISR/PGPR-like response, we performed treatments with purified Nod-factors from <italic>B. japonicum</italic> as well as using Nod factor receptor plant mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). Similarly to <italic>B. japonicum</italic> inoculation, Nod factors treatment induced transient peak of ROS. Moreover, the systemic response was completely different when plant roots were treated with two derivatives of chitin oligosaccharides, Nod factors or chitosan, a potent pathogen elicitor (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>).</p>
<p>The Nod factor receptors have been characterized in different legumes. They are composed by pairs of LysM-receptor kinases and therefore share many similarities to chitin receptors. Soybean contains two genes GmNFR5&#x03B1; and GmNFR5&#x03B2; among others within its genome but only GmNFR5&#x03B1; is functional in <italic>Glycine max</italic>. Chemically induced non-nodulating nod139 mutant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Carroll et al., 1986</xref>) present a single nucleotide substitutions (non-sense) within the coding region of the GmNFR5&#x03B1; and this results in the elimination of most of the kinase domain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Indrasumunar et al., 2010</xref>). The <italic>B. japonicum</italic> inoculation of <italic>nfr5-</italic>mutant (nod139) lacked the systemic ROS changes and was non-tolerant to photooxidative stress conditions through ISR/PGPR-like response (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, we also analyzed the participation of AON in the systemic redox changes and ISR/PGPR-like response induced by <italic>B. japonicum</italic> inoculation. For this purpose, we used mutant plants that lost the GmNARK function (nts1007 with a mutation of V370D) and that exhibit supernodulation phenotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Searle et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Lin et al., 2010</xref>). GmNARK is an LRR receptor kinase homolog to <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> CLAVATA1, but without conserved function of inflorescence meristem regulation. GmNARK is expressed in the root and shoot and its main function is in local and systemic regulation of nodulation. Locally, root GmNARK plays a key role in the nitrate inhibition of nodulation mediated by NIC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Lim et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Reid et al., 2011a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Mirzaei et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Ferguson et al., 2018</xref>). Systemically, leaf GmNARK participates in the AON by perceiving CLE peptides from rhizobium inoculated roots (RIC1 and RIC2) and inducing the synthesis of SDI, which is transported by phloem to the root where it provokes the inhibition of nodulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Searle et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Lim et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Reid et al., 2011b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Ferguson et al., 2018</xref>). The <italic>nark</italic>-mutant showed the same systemic redox changes than the <italic>wt</italic> plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>); however, this mutant failed to induce the ISR/PGPR-like response with tolerance to photooxidative stress condition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>). Likewise, the phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity, which catalyzes the conversion of <sc>L</sc>-phenylalanine to <italic>trans</italic>-cinnamic acid, showed a significant increase only in the inoculated <italic>wt</italic> plants, whereas this activity remained unaltered in both mutants upon the inoculation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>). These results indicate that both Nod factors perception and AON signaling are necessary for the activation of PAL, the key enzyme in the phenylpropanoid pathway and a marker of ISR and primed plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Conrath, 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Transcriptomic analysis using this mutants showed that GmNARK regulates the expression of JA pathway genes and participates in plant defense responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Kinkema and Gresshoff, 2008</xref>). The promoter region of GmNARK gene contains multiple <italic>cis</italic>-elements involved in plant responses to hormones and biotic stresses. Likewise, GmNARK expression is induced by ABA and NaCl and its overexpression increases the sensitivity to salt and ABA treatment, thus indicating the involvement of this receptor also in the responses to abiotic stresses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Cheng et al., 2018</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Pieterse et al. (2014)</xref> have well established the importance of SA, JA/ET as key signals in the regulation of the plant systemic immune responses SAR and ISR. In the present work, these hormones neither showed any difference in <italic>wt</italic> soybean at 30 min post inoculation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>), where the ROS peak was detected, nor at 72 h post inoculation in <italic>wt, nark</italic> and <italic>nfr5</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS4">Supplementary Figure S4</xref>), where the ISR/PGPR-like response is established.</p>
<p>The molecular identity of SDI is still unknown. In <italic>Lotus japonicum</italic> the CLE-RS1/2-HAR1 interaction triggered the production of CKs in shoot, which have been postulated as SDI. CKs production in the shoot of <italic>Lotus</italic> is mediated by the activation of isopentenyl transferase 3 (LjIPT3) in a HAR1 dependent pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Sasaki et al., 2014</xref>). Likewise, CKs have been largely characterized as positive regulator of nodulation at root level (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Murray et al., 2007</xref>). This dual role could depend on the site of synthesis, the concentration and the type of CKs as well as the receptor involved in the process. Moreover, the CKs that promote nodulation are independent of AON signaling. However, the anti-senescence and stress tolerance functions of CKs induced during legume&#x2013;rhizobium symbiotic interaction have not been studied yet. In this context, we propose that ISR/PGPR-like response induced during legume&#x2013;rhizobium symbiotic interaction may be related to the AON-related CKs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>).</p>
<p>After root inoculation, and in opposition to what was observed in <italic>Lotus</italic>, recent data showed an GmNARK-independent induction of GmIPT5, an ortholog of LjIPT3 in soybean shoots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Mens et al., 2018</xref>). This finding suggests differences between soybean and <italic>Lotus</italic> pathway or an uncertainty of the IPT-AON association.</p>
<p>Altogether, our results showed that the NADPH-dependent transient systemic redox changes induced after root inoculation with <italic>B. japonicum</italic> in soybean rely upon Nod factor signaling and that these changes are involved in the priming and induction of the ISR/PGPR-like response (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>). In this sense, CKs play a dual role, participating in the mechanism involved in AON and ISR/PGPR-like response (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>). Finally, the involvement of the AON mechanisms in the ISR/PGPR-like response also suggests that systemic redox changes induced during soybean&#x2013;<italic>B. japonicum</italic> interaction are early components of the AON pathway. Nevertheless, future studies should be addressed to confirm this hypothesis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>RL, SA, and NM designed the experiments. TF-G and RD conducted the experiments. TF-G analyzed the data. TF-G, GR, and RL co-wrote the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conflict of Interest Statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure">
<p><bold>Funding.</bold> This work was supported by grants from the Agencia de Promoci&#x00F3;n Cient&#x00ED;fica y Tecnol&#x00F3;gica, Argentina (PICT-2008-0067), Instituto Nacional de Tecnolog&#x00ED;a Agropecuaria (INTA- PNBIO-1131022), and Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnolog&#x00ED;a (SECYT) Universidad Nacional de C&#x00F3;rdoba.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ack>
<p>Thanks to the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient&#x00ED;ficas y T&#x00E9;cnicas de la Rep&#x00FA;blica Argentina (CONICET) and Instituto Nacional de Tecnolog&#x00ED;a Agropecuaria (INTA). TF-G is a Ph.D. student from CONICET and RL and SA are researchers from CONICET. Thanks to Julia Ver&#x00F3;nica Sabio y Garcia for the help with the English of the manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.00141/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.00141/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.TIF" id="FS1" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>FIGURE S1</label>
<caption><p>Systemic H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> generation in leaves after root treatments with <italic>B. japonicum</italic>, purified Nod factors and chitosan. H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> was quantified by spectrofluorometer. The results are the means of three independent experiments (six leaves per treatment). Data are means &#x00B1; SE. Asterisks indicate significant difference between non-inoculated and inoculated plants (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test).</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_2.tif" id="FS2" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>FIGURE S2</label>
<caption><p>Diagram of the experimental system for paraquat (PQ) treatment. 12-days-old soybean plants were inoculated with <italic>B. japonicum</italic>, and PQ treatments were performed in leaves at 24 and 48 h post inoculation (hpi). The physiological parameters were measured 24 h after PQ treatment.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_3.TIF" id="FS3" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>FIGURE S3</label>
<caption><p>Relatives values (inoculated/control) of SPAD, PSII and <italic>F</italic><sub>v</sub>/<italic>F</italic><sub>m</sub> in plants at 24 and 48 h without paraquat (PQ) treatments; the parameters were measured at 48 and 72 h post inoculation, respectively. The results are the means of three independent experiments (nine leaves per treatment). Data are means &#x00B1; SE. No significant differences were observed between non-inoculated and inoculated plants (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test).</p></caption></supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_4.TIF" id="FS4" mimetype="image/tiff" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>FIGURE S4</label>
<caption><p>Jasmonic acid <bold>(A)</bold> and salicylic acid <bold>(B)</bold> contents in leaves of non-inoculated and inoculated plants at 72 h post inoculation (hpi). The results are the means of four replicates &#x00B1; SE (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, Tukey test). No significant differences were observed between non-inoculated and inoculated plants.</p></caption></supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arthikala</surname> <given-names>M.-K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montiel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x00E1;nchez-L&#x00F3;pez</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nava</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>C&#x00E1;rdenas</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quinto</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Respiratory burst oxidase homolog gene a is crucial for rhizobium infection and nodule maturation and function in common bean.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>2003</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.02003</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29218056</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Asada</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>The water-water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>50</volume> <fpage>601</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>639</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.601</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15012221</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beaudoin-Eagan</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thorpe</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Tyrosine and phenylalanine ammonia lyase activities during shoot initiation in tobacco callus cultures.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant physiol.</italic></source> <volume>78</volume> <fpage>438</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.78.3.438</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16664262</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benzie</surname> <given-names>I. F. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strain</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of &#x201C;antioxidant power&#x201D;: the frap assay.</article-title> <source><italic>Anal. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>239</volume> <fpage>70</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/abio.1996.0292</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8660627</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boller</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Felix</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>60</volume> <fpage>379</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>406</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19400727</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bradford</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1976</year>). <article-title>A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.</article-title> <source><italic>Anal. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>72</volume> <fpage>248</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>254</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Broughton</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dilworth</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1971</year>). <article-title>Control of leghaemoglobin synthesis in snake beans.</article-title> <source><italic>Biochem. J.</italic></source> <volume>125</volume> <fpage>1075</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1080</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1042/bj1251075</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5144223</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caetano-Anolles</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gresshoff</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Plant genetic control of nodulation.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Rev. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>45</volume> <fpage>345</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>382</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.mi.45.100191.002021</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Halane</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gassmann</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stacey</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The role of plant innate immunity in the legume-rhizobium symbiosis.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>68</volume> <fpage>535</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>561</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-041030</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28142283</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>C&#x00E1;rdenas</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x00ED;nez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x00E1;nchez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quinto</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Fast, transient and specific intracellular ROS changes in living root hair cells responding to Nod factors (NFs).</article-title> <source><italic>Plant J.</italic></source> <volume>56</volume> <fpage>802</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>813</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03644.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18680562</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carroll</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcneil</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gresshoff</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Mutagenesis of soybean (<italic>Glycine max</italic> (L.) Merr.) and the isolation of non-nodulation mutants.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>114</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0168-9452(86)90057-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carroll</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McNeil</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gresshofft</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Isolation and properties of soybean [<italic>Glycine max</italic> (L.) Merr.] mutants that nodulate in the presence of high nitrate concentrations.</article-title> <source><italic>PNAS</italic></source> <volume>82</volume> <fpage>4162</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4166</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.82.12.4162</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16593577</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Casano</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x00F3;mez</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lascano</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trippi</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Inactivation and degradation of CuZn-SOD by active oxygen species in wheat chloroplasts exposed to photooxidative stress.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>38</volume> <fpage>433</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>440</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029186</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9177029</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Knockdown of LjIPT3 influences nodule development in lotus japonicus.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>55</volume> <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>193</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pct171</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24285753</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The soybean gmNARK affects ABA and salt responses in transgenic <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>514</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.00514</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29720993</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>W. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallace</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harper</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mittler</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gilroy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Orchestrating rapid long-distance signaling in plants with Ca2+, ROS and electrical signals.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant J.</italic></source> <volume>90</volume> <fpage>698</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>707</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.13492</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28112437</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Conrath</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Molecular aspects of defence priming.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>16</volume> <fpage>524</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>531</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2011.06.004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21782492</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Couto</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zipfel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Regulation of pattern recognition receptor signalling in plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Rev. Immunol.</italic></source> <volume>16</volume> <fpage>537</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>552</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nri.2016.77</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27477127</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Damiani</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pauly</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Puppo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brouquisse</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boscari</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide control early steps of the legume &#x2013; rhizobium symbiotic interaction.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>454</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00454</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27092165</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Di Rienzo</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casanoves</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Balzarini</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tablada</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robledo</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source><italic>InfoStat: Statistical Software.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>C&#x00F3;rdoba</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de C&#x00F3;rdoba</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dimkpa</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weinand</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asch</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Environ.</italic></source> <volume>32</volume> <fpage>1682</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1694</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19671096</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Durgbanshi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arbona</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pozo</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miersch</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sancho</surname> <given-names>J. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x00F3;mez-Cadenas</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Simultaneous determination of multiple phytohormones in plant extracts by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Agric. Food Chem.</italic></source> <volume>53</volume> <fpage>8437</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8442</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf050884b</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16248534</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Indrasumunar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayashi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Molecular analysis of legume nodule development and autoregulation.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Interact. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>52</volume> <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00899.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20074141</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mens</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hastwell</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Legume nodulation: the host controls the party.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Environ.</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.13348</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29808564</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Foreman</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Demidchik</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bothwell</surname> <given-names>J. H. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mylona</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miedema</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Torres</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase regulate plant cell growth.</article-title> <source><italic>Nature</italic></source> <volume>422</volume> <fpage>442</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>446</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature01485</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12660786</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Foyer</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noctor</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Redox regulation in photosynthetic organisms.</article-title> <source><italic>Antioxid. Redox Signal.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume> <fpage>861</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>905</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/ars.2008.2177</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19239350</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Foyer</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noctor</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Ascorbate and glutathione: the heart of the redox hub.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>155</volume> <fpage>2</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.110.167569</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21205630</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gallego</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benavides</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tomaro</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Effect of heavy metal ion excess on sunflower leaves: evidence for involvement of oxidative stress.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>121</volume> <fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>159</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0168-9452(96)04528-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gaupels</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Durner</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kogel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Production, amplification and systemic propagation of redox messengers in plants? The phloem can do it all!</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>214</volume> <fpage>554</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>560</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.14399</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28044323</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gilroy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>W. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Toyota</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Devireddy</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>A tidal wave of signals: calcium and ROS at the forefront of rapid systemic signaling.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>623</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>630</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2014.06.013</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25088679</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gourion</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berrabah</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ratet</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stacey</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Rhizobium &#x2013; legume symbioses: the crucial role of plant immunity.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>20</volume> <fpage>186</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>194</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2014.11.008</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25543258</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vance</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Update on legume utilization legumes: importance and constraints to greater use.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>131</volume> <fpage>872</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>877</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.017004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12644639</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guilbault</surname> <given-names>G. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brignac</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Juneau</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1968</year>). <article-title>New substrates for the fluorometric determination of oxidative enzymes.</article-title> <source><italic>Anal. Chem.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>1256</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1263</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ac60264a027</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5743279</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hardy</surname> <given-names>R. W. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holsten</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burns</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1968</year>). <article-title>The acetylene - ethylene assay for N2 fixation: laboratory and field evaluation.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>1185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1207</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.43.8.1185</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heath</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Packer</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1968</year>). <article-title>Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts.</article-title> <source><italic>Arch. Biochem. Biophys.</italic></source> <volume>125</volume> <fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>198</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Indrasumunar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kereszt</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Searle</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miyagi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>C. D. T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Inactivation of duplicated nod factor receptor 5 (NFR5) genes in recessive loss-of-function non-nodulation mutants of allotetraploid soybean (<italic>Glycine max</italic> L. Merr.).</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>51</volume> <fpage>201</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>214</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pcp178</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20007291</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Indrasumunar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Searle</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kereszt</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Men</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carroll</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Nodulation factor receptor kinase 1 a controls nodule organ number in soybean (<italic>Glycine max</italic> L. Merr).</article-title> <source><italic>Plant J.</italic></source> <volume>65</volume> <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04398.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21175888</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wichern</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Multivariate analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>Encycl. Stat. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>2011</volume> <fpage>8279</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8282</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6092041</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22256265</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kinkema</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gresshoff</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Investigation of downstream signals of the soybean autoregulation of nodulation receptor kinase GmNARK.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>1337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1348</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/MPMI-21-10-1337</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18785829</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kranner</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Birti&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pritchard</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Glutathione half-cell reduction potential: a universal stress marker and modulator of programmed cell death?</article-title> <source><italic>Free Radic. Biol. Med.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>2155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2165</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.02.013</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16785029</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lascano</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Melchiorre</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luna</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trippi</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Effect of photooxidative stress induced by paraquat in two wheat cultivars with differential tolerance to water stress.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>164</volume> <fpage>841</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>848</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00073-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lascano</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mu&#x00F1;oz</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Melchiorre</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trippi</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Paraquat: an oxidative stress inducer</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Herbicides - Properties, Synthesis and Control of Weeds</italic></source>, <role>ed.</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Hasaneen</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>InTech</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Y. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hwang</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Soybean nodule-enhanced CLE peptides in roots act as signals in gmnark-mediated nodulation suppression.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>52</volume> <fpage>1613</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1627</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pcr091</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21757457</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Limpens</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Zeijl</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geurts</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Lipochitooligosaccharides modulate plant host immunity to enable endosymbioses.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Rev. Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>53</volume> <fpage>311</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>334</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-phyto-080614-120149</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26047562</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kereszt</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gresshoff</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Suppression of hypernodulation in soybean by a leaf- extracted, NARK- and Nod factor-dependent, low molecular mass fraction.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>185</volume> <fpage>1074</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1086</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03163.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20100211</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Masson-Boivin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sachs</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Symbiotic nitrogen fixation by rhizobia &#x2014; the roots of a success story.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>44</volume> <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2017.12.001</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29289792</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maxwell</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>G. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Chlorophyll fluorescence&#x2014;a practical guide.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>51</volume> <fpage>659</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>668</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/51.345.659</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Melchiorre</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trippi</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Racca</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lascano</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase overexpression in wheat protoplast: photooxidative stress tolerance and changes in cellular redox state.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Growth Regul.</italic></source> <volume>57</volume> <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10725-008-9322-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mens</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haaima</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gresshoff</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Local and systemic effect of cytokinins on soybean nodulation and regulation of their isopentenyl transferase (IPT) biosynthesis genes following rhizobia inoculation.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>1150</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.01150</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30135694</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schlauch</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tam</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cortes</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Torres</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shulaev</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The plant NADPH oxidase RBOHD mediates rapid systemic signaling in response to diverse stimuli.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Signal.</italic></source> <volume>2</volume>:<issue>ra45</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/scisignal.2000448</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19690331</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shulaev</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mittler</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Reactive oxygen signaling and abiotic stress.</article-title> <source><italic>Physiol. Plant.</italic></source> <volume>133</volume> <fpage>481</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>489</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01090.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18346071</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rizhsky</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hegie</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koussevitzky</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mittler</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Double mutants deficient in cytosolic and thylakoid ascorbate peroxidase reveal a complex mode of interaction between reactive oxygen species, plant development, and response to abiotic stresses.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>144</volume> <fpage>1777</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1785</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.107.101436</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17556505</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mirzaei</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Batley</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>El-Mellouki</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meksem</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Neodiversification of homeologous CLAVATA1-like receptor kinase genes in soybean leads to distinct developmental outcomes.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>8878</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-08252-y</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28827708</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miwa</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Okazaki</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>How effectors promote beneficial interactions.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>38</volume> <fpage>148</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2017.05.011</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28622658</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Montiel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nava</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>C&#x00E1;rdenas</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x00E1;nchez-L&#x00F3;pez</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arthikala</surname> <given-names>M.-K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santana</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A Phaseolus vulgaris NADPH oxidase gene is required for root infection by rhizobia.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>53</volume> <fpage>1751</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1767</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pcs120</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22942250</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mu&#x00F1;oz</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Melchiorre</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Racca</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lascano</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Saline and osmotic stress differentially affects apoplastic and intracellular reactive oxygen species production, curling and death of root hair during <italic>Glycine max</italic> L.&#x2013; <italic>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</italic> interaction.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>78</volume> <fpage>76</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.12.008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mu&#x00F1;oz</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lascano</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014a</year>). <article-title>Negative short-term salt effects on the soybean-<italic>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</italic> interaction and partial reversion by calcium addition.</article-title> <source><italic>Funct. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>41</volume> <fpage>96</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>105</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/FP13085</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mu&#x00F1;oz</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soria-d&#x00ED;az</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manyani</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x00E1;nchez-matamoros</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gil Serrano</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meg&#x00ED;as</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014b</year>). <article-title>Structure and biological activities of lipochitooligosaccharide nodulation signals produced by <italic>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</italic> USDA 138 under saline and osmotic stress.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Fertil. Soils</italic></source> <volume>50</volume> <fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-013-0843-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Murray</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karas</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sato</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tabata</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amyot</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szczyglowski</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>A cytokinin perception mutant colonized by rhizobium in the absence of nodule organogenesis.</article-title> <source><italic>Science</italic></source> <volume>315</volume> <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>104</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1132514</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17110535</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nadzieja</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stougaard</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Epidermal auxin biosynthesis facilitates rhizobial infection in <italic>Lotus japonicus</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant J.</italic></source> <volume>95</volume> <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.13934</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29676826</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nakano</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asada</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>867</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>880</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076232</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Okamoto</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohnishi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sato</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakazono</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tabata</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Nod factor/nitrate-induced CLE genes that drive HAR1-mediated systemic regulation of nodulation.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>50</volume> <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pcn194</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19074184</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Okamoto</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shinohara</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mori</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsubayashi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kawaguchi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Root-derived CLE glycopeptides control nodulation by direct binding to HAR1 receptor kinase.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Commun.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume>:<issue>2191</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms3191</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23934307</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oldroyd</surname> <given-names>G. E. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Downie</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Coordinating nodule morphogenesis with rhizobial infection in legumes.</article-title> <source><italic>Anual Rev. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>59</volume> <fpage>519</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>546</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092839</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18444906</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oldroyd</surname> <given-names>G. E. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murray</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poole</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Downie</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The rules of engagement in the legume-rhizobial symbiosis.</article-title> <source><italic>Anual Rev. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>45</volume> <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>144</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132549</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21838550</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Peleg-Grossman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Volpin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levine</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Root hair curling and rhizobium infection in <italic>Medicago truncatula</italic> are mediated by phosphatidylinositide-regulated endocytosis and reactive oxygen species.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>58</volume> <fpage>1637</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1649</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erm013</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17420174</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pieterse</surname> <given-names>C. M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zamioudis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berendsen</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weller</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Wees</surname> <given-names>S. C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>P. A. H. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Rev. Phytopathol.</italic></source> <volume>52</volume> <fpage>347</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>375</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24906124</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gresshoff</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011a</year>). <article-title>Inoculation- and nitrate-induced CLE peptides of soybean control NARK-dependent nodule formation.</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Plant Microb. Interact.</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>606</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>618</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/MPMI-09-10-0207</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21198362</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayashi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gresshoff</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011b</year>). <article-title>Molecular mechanisms controlling legume autoregulation of nodulation.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>108</volume> <fpage>789</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>795</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcr205</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21856632</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gresshoff</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Structure &#x2013; function analysis of the Gm RIC1 signal peptide and CLE domain required for nodulation control in soybean.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>64</volume> <fpage>1575</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1585</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ert008</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23386683</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Melchiorre</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Racca</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trippi</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lascano</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Apoplastic superoxide level in wheat protoplast under photooxidative stress is regulated by chloroplast redox signals: effects on the antioxidant system.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>177</volume> <fpage>168</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.05.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mu&#x00F1;oz</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alvarado-Affantranger</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saavedra</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davidenco</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodr&#x00ED;guez-Kessler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase function at very early symbiont perception: a local nodulation control under stress conditions?</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>69</volume> <fpage>2037</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2048</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ery030</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29394394</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mu&#x00F1;oz</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Melchiorre</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanchez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lascano</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Expression of animal anti-apoptotic gene Ced-9 enhances tolerance during <italic>Glycine max</italic> L.&#x2013; <italic>Bradyrhizobium japonicum</italic> interaction under saline stress but reduces nodule formation.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<issue>e101747</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0101747</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25050789</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodr&#x00ED;guez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taleisnik</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lenardon</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lascano</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Are Sunflower chlorotic mottle virus infection symptoms modulated by early increases in leaf sugar concentration?</article-title> <source><italic>J. Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>167</volume> <fpage>1137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1144</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2010.03.004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20413182</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sasaki</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suzaki</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soyano</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kojima</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sakakibara</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kawaguchi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Shoot-derived cytokinins systemically regulate root nodulation.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Commun.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>:<issue>4983</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms5983</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25236855</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B76"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schaedle</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bassham</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Chloroplast glutathione reductase.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>59</volume> <fpage>1011</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1012</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.59.5.1011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B77"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rasband</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eliceiri</surname> <given-names>K. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>NIH Image to imageJ: 25 years of image analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Methods</italic></source> <volume>9</volume> <fpage>671</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>675</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.2089</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B78"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Searle</surname> <given-names>I. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Men</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laniya</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buzas</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Iturbe-Ormaetxe</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carroll</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Long-distance signaling in nodulation directed by a clavata1-like receptor kinase.</article-title> <source><italic>Science</italic></source> <volume>299</volume> <fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>112</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1077937</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12411574</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B79"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Strasser</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsimilli-Michael</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples</article-title>,&#x201D; <source><italic>Probing Photosynthesis: Mechanism, Regulation and Adaptation</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Mohanty</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yunus</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pathre</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Taylor and Francis</publisher-name>), <fpage>443</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>480</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B80"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Torres</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dangl</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Functions of the respiratory burst oxidase in biotic interactions, abiotic stress and development.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>397</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>403</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.014</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15939662</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B81"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vincent</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1971</year>). <source><italic>A Manual for the Practical Study of Root-nodule Bacteria.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Blackwell Scientifoc Publications</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B82"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zamioudis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pieterse</surname> <given-names>C. M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Modulation of host immunity by beneficial microbes.</article-title> <source><italic>MPMI</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>150</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0179</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21995763</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B83"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zipfel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oldroyd</surname> <given-names>G. E. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Plant signalling in symbiosis and immunity.</article-title> <source><italic>Nature</italic></source> <volume>543</volume> <fpage>328</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>336</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature22009</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28300100</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<glossary>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<def-list id="DL1">
<def-item>
<term>ABA</term>
<def>
<p>abscisic acid</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>AON</term>
<def>
<p>autoregulation of nodulation</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>APX</term>
<def>
<p>ascorbate peroxidase</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>CAT</term>
<def>
<p>catalase</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>CKs</term>
<def>
<p>cytokinins</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>DPI</term>
<def>
<p>diphenyleneiodonium</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>ET</term>
<def>
<p>ethylene</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>GmNARK</term>
<def>
<p><italic>Glycine max</italic> nodulation autoregulation receptor kinase</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>GR</term>
<def>
<p>glutathione reductase</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>hpi</term>
<def>
<p>hours post inoculation</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>HAR1</term>
<def>
<p>hypernodulation aberrant root formation 1</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>IPT</term>
<def>
<p>isopentenyl transferase</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>ISR</term>
<def>
<p>induced systemic resistance</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>JA</term>
<def>
<p>jasmonic acid</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>LCO</term>
<def>
<p>lipo-chitooligosaccharide</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>LRR</term>
<def>
<p>leucine-rich repeat</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>MAMPs</term>
<def>
<p>microorganism associated molecular patterns</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>MDA</term>
<def>
<p>malondialdehyde</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>NF</term>
<def>
<p>Nod factors</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>NFR5</term>
<def>
<p>Nod factor receptor 5</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>NIC</term>
<def>
<p>nitrate-induced CLE peptides</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>PAL</term>
<def>
<p>phenylalanine ammonia-lyase</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>PGPR</term>
<def>
<p>plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>PQ</term>
<def>
<p>paraquat</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>RBOH</term>
<def>
<p>respiratory burst oxidase homolog</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>RIC</term>
<def>
<p>rhizobia-induced CLE peptides</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>ROS</term>
<def>
<p>reactive oxygen species</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>SA</term>
<def>
<p>salicylic acid</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>SAA</term>
<def>
<p>systemic acquired acclimation</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>SAR</term>
<def>
<p>systemic acquired resistance</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>SDI</term>
<def>
<p>shoot-derived inhibitor</p>
</def>
</def-item>
<def-item>
<term>SOD</term>
<def>
<p>superoxide dismutase</p>
</def>
</def-item>
</def-list>
</glossary>
</back>
</article>