<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.00639</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Methods</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Additive Manufacturing of Devices Used for Collection and Application of Cereal Rust Urediniospores</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group> 
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Pretorius</surname> <given-names>Zacharias A.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/333943/overview"/>
</contrib> 
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Booysen</surname> <given-names>Gerrie J.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib> 
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Boshoff</surname> <given-names>Willem H. P.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib> 
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Joubert</surname> <given-names>Jozua H.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib> 
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Maree</surname> <given-names>Gerrie J.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib> 
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Els</surname> <given-names>Johan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/721565/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Plant Sciences, University of the Free State</institution>, <addr-line>Bloemfontein</addr-line>, <country>South Africa</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Centre for Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing, Central University of Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Bloemfontein</addr-line>, <country>South Africa</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Product Development Technology Station, Central University of Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Bloemfontein</addr-line>, <country>South Africa</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Jonathan Spencer West, Rothamsted Research (BBSRC), United Kingdom</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Rohan Benjamin Essex Kimber, South Australian Research and Development Institute, Australia; Li Huang, Montana State University, United States</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Zacharias A. Pretorius, <email>PretorZA@ufs.ac.za</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Technical Advances in Plant Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>639</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>02</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2018</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>29</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2019 Pretorius, Booysen, Boshoff, Joubert, Maree and Els.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Pretorius, Booysen, Boshoff, Joubert, Maree and Els</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Optimized inoculation procedures are an important consideration in achieving repeatable plant infection when working with biotrophic rust fungi. Several plant pathology laboratories specializing in rust research employ a system where the collection and application of fungal spores are accomplished using an exchangeable gelatin capsule. Urediniospores are collected from erumpent pustules on plant surfaces into a capsule fitted to a cyclone collector controlled by a vacuum pump. By adding light mineral oil to the same capsule, the spore suspension is then sprayed onto plants by means of a dedicated atomizer (inoculator) connected to an air pressure source. Although devices are not commercially available, modern day technologies provide an opportunity to efficiently design and manufacture collectors and inoculators. Using a process called Additive Manufacturing (AM), also known as &#x201C;3D printing,&#x201D; the bodies of a collector and inoculator were digitally designed and then laser-sintered in nylon. Depending on availability, copper or aluminum tubes were fitted to the bodies of both devices afterward to either facilitate directed collection of spores from rust pustules on plant surfaces or act as a siphon tube to deliver the spore suspension contained in the capsule. No statistical differences were found between AM and metal inoculators for spray delivery time or spore deposition per unit area. In replicated collection and inoculation tests of wheat seedlings with urediniospore bulks or single pustule collections of <italic>Puccinia triticina</italic> and <italic>P. graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic>, the causal organisms of leaf rust and stem rust, consistent and satisfactory infection levels were achieved. Immersing used devices in acetone for 60 s followed by a 2 h heat treatment at 75&#x00B0;C produced no contaminant infection in follow-up tests.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>3D printing</kwd>
<kwd>atomizer</kwd>
<kwd>cereal rust fungi</kwd>
<kwd>cyclone collector</kwd>
<kwd>spore collector</kwd>
<kwd>spore applicator</kwd>
<kwd>urediniospores</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Research Foundation<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001321</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="26"/>
<page-count count="7"/>
<word-count count="0"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Several methods are available for controlled inoculation of cereal plants with urediniospores of rust fungi. In general, the method of choice depends on the number of plants to be inoculated, their growth stage, source and amount of inoculum, and available research infrastructure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Knott, 1989</xref>). Procedures include the application of dry spores to plant surfaces by dusting, either directly or by using a carrier such as talcum powder, brushing of plant surfaces with sporulating lesions on infected plants, transferring dry spores to leaf surfaces using a moistened spatula or similar instrument, dipping seedling leaves into water on which spores are floated, or by spraying plants with a spore suspension (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Browder, 1971</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Knott, 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Roelfs et al., 1992</xref>). Urediniospores could be suspended in water containing a surfactant, in isoparaffinic, light mineral oil products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Roelfs et al., 1992</xref>), e.g., Soltrol<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> 130 (Chevron Phillips Chemical Company) or, more recently, in Novec<sup>TM</sup> 7100 (3M<sup>TM</sup>) engineered fluid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">S&#x00F8;rensen et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Browder (1965)</xref> described the construction of an air pressure operated brass atomizer delivering a spore-oil suspension from an inoculum reservoir in an attached glass vial. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Browder (1971)</xref> developed a system to collect spores by means of a cyclone collector into a gelatin capsule (size 00) which could be directly transferred, after adding carrier oil, to an atomizer (also referred to as an inoculator). Although the design of atomizers used may differ, cereal rust facilities such as the University of Minnesota, ARS-USDA Cereal Disease Laboratory, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, CIMMYT, and laboratories in Australia and South Africa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Kolmer et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Fetch et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Pretorius et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Terefe et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Elmansour et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Lan et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Steffenson et al., 2017</xref>) have all reported the application of spores suspended in light mineral oil. If a supply of clean collectors and inoculators and a flushable inoculation booth are available, many isolates can be handled with ease. This approach is particularly suited to rust race analyses where several sets of differential lines need to be inoculated with different isolates in one session.</p>
<p>The devices described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Browder (1971)</xref> are not commercially available and are manufactured by a conventional milling process that requires a specialized workshop and skilled personnel. Likewise, costs, and the availability of a suitable carrier oil and gelatin capsules could be prohibitive in some countries. From experience we have also noted variation in delivery efficiency between batches of atomizers manufactured from metal. This often impacts negatively on experiments due to the over or under application of inoculum.</p>
<p>The objective of this project was to design a new collector and atomizer, using the basic operational principles proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Browder (1971)</xref>, but employing Additive Manufacturing (AM) to facilitate a more consistent and easy to produce product. AM refers to a process by which a three-dimensional (3D) computer-aided design (CAD) is used to construct a component layer by layer by depositing material available in a fine powder form (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Weller et al., 2015</xref>). The term &#x201C;3D printing&#x201D; is often informally used as a synonym for AM and allows the cost-efficient production of customized products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Weller et al., 2015</xref>). AM, however, is a more comprehensive description as it encompasses the entire range of technologies involved in efficiently translating model data into a physical object (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Gibson et al., 2010</xref>). A variety of different metals, plastics and composite materials may be used in the manufacturing process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Levy et al., 2003</xref>). The technology has many applications, e.g., in aerospace, automotive, biomedical and engineering fields, and for manufacturing industrial machines and consumer products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Guo and Liu, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Wohler et al., 2017</xref>). In addition, AM has evolved from rapid prototyping to construction of end-user products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Sossou et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec><title>Devices, CAD and 3D Printing</title>
<p>In a cereal rust context, the basic principle of the interchangeable device-capsule system is the controlled collection of fungal spores and expulsion of small amounts of inoculum in suspension, often in oil, onto plant parts. By connecting an air vacuum to the cyclone collector, fungal spores are drawn up through the copper intake tube and accumulate on the inside walls and/or in the conical bottom of the capsule. Once oil is added and the capsule fitted to an inoculator, air pressure applied to the inlet socket allows the spore suspension to escape through a siphon tube before being discharged as a fine mist.</p>
<p>Based on the descriptions by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Browder (1971)</xref>, devices were digitally designed with Solidworks<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> software (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>) and manufactured in nylon using an EOSINT P 385 thermoplastics laser sintering system. PA 2200, a polyamide 12 based powder which serves a variety of applications<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn01">1</xref></sup>, was used in the sintering process.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Cross section of a digitally designed cyclone spore collector used in handling cereal rust urediniospores.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00639-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Cross section of a digitally designed inoculator used in handling cereal rust urediniospores.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00639-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Once the body of a device was manufactured, excess powder was removed from flow channels by compressed air. For each device, a copper or aluminum tube fitted afterward allowed for either the controlled collection of fungal spores from rust pustules, or was used as a siphon tube connecting the inoculator body with the spore suspension in the capsule (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Design of a complete inoculator fitted with a copper tube and containing a gelatin capsule.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00639-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Design of a complete collector fitted with a copper tube and containing a gelatin capsule.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00639-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Device Testing</title>
<sec><title>Spray Time</title>
<p>The spray delivery time of AM inoculators and traditionally manufactured metal inoculators was compared. For this purpose, the time (seconds) to discharge 0.8 ml carrier Soltrol 130<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> isoparaffinic oil at a 25 kPa pressure setting, using a Vacuubrand<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> pump (model MZ2), was recorded for 10 inoculators of each type. The experiment was designed to include two sprays for each inoculator and an independent but similar repetition, using different sets of inoculators.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Spore Deposition</title>
<p>The number of urediniospores deposited per centimeter square was determined by spraying a suspension of 0.4 mg spores per ml Soltrol 130<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> isoparaffinic oil onto microscope slides. To mirror the freehand spray pattern of an actual seedling inoculation protocol, the glass slides, covered with a thin layer of Plantex<sup>&#x00AE;</sup>, were vertically positioned on a rotating platform in the inoculation booth. To allow for a quantifiable number of spores per unit area, the adhesive side of each slide passed only once through the spray cloud. Three slides were sprayed with each of two AM and two metal inoculators, respectively. The number of urediniospores applied was counted, using a stereo microscope, on two 1-cm<sup>2</sup> squares drawn earlier on the lower side of each slide. Identical experiments were conducted for urediniospore deposition of <italic>Puccinia triticina</italic> (<italic>Pt</italic>, causal agent of wheat leaf rust) and <italic>P. graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic> (<italic>Pgt</italic>, causal agent of wheat stem rust).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Handling Single-Pustule Isolates</title>
<p>The efficiency of collectors and atomizers in handling urediniospores from individual leaf or stem rust uredinia (pustules) was tested. Following collection of spores from a single uredinium using an AM cyclone collector connected to a vacuum pump, 0.3 ml Soltrol 130<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> isoparaffinic oil was added to the capsule and sprayed onto one pot of 7-day-old Morocco wheat seedlings. Morocco, which is susceptible to both leaf and stem rust, was grown in Mikskaar Professional Potting Soil 70 (distributed by Hygrotech, Pretoria, South Africa) in 10-cm diameter plastic pots. This process was repeated using an additional three different collectors and atomizers for each of the rust pathogens and the entire experiment was repeated. The number of leaves studied per pot ranged from 31 to 51, and from 39 to 49, in the <italic>Pt</italic> and <italic>Pgt</italic> single-pustule tests, respectively.</p>
<p>To determine the level of infection on the number of plants that would constitute a regular differential set as used in phenotypic race analysis, four pots, each containing five clumps of Morocco, were inoculated with spores collected from a single pustule suspended in 0.8 ml Soltrol 130<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> isoparaffinic oil. This procedure was conducted for both rust pathogens. In total, 123 seedling leaves were evaluated for <italic>Pt</italic> and 113 leaves for <italic>Pgt</italic> infection with spores collected from a single uredinium, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Handling Bulk Spore Collections</title>
<p>Infection levels on primary leaves of Morocco seedlings were investigated in a spore multiplication procedure. Using urediniospores collected in bulk and Soltrol 130<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> isoparaffinic oil, 0.8 ml inoculum of each pathogen was applied to four pots of Morocco seedlings. The spore concentration was 1 mg spores / ml oil for <italic>Pt</italic> and 5 mg / ml for <italic>Pgt</italic>. Pots were placed on a rotating disk in an enclosed inoculation booth and fully expanded primary leaves were spray-inoculated by connecting the Vacuubrand<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> pump, registering a pressure of 25 kPa during operation, to the atomizer. For each pathogen this treatment was replicated using different atomizers.</p>
<p>In all infection experiments the inoculation booth was flushed with water for 30 s between sprays and standard protocols for cleaning, post-inoculation drying of seedlings, dew chamber incubation and maintenance in the greenhouse were applied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Pretorius et al., 2012</xref>). Since the response of wheat lines in routine screening or race typing experiments is determined on a qualitative infection type, the number of infected leaves (infection frequency) and minimum number of uredinia on any leaf were determined in the experiments described above.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Sterilization</title>
<p>Sterilization tests for AM collection and inoculation devices were conducted with <italic>Pt</italic> and <italic>Pgt</italic>, using metal devices as control treatments. Collectors and inoculators of each type, cleaned according to the regular protocol for metal devices at the UFS rust laboratory, were used to initiate experiments.</p>
<p>For each of <italic>Pt</italic> and <italic>Pgt</italic>, six AM and six metal collectors were exposed to urediniospores as would be experienced during routine spore handling operations. Three collectors of each type and for each pathogen were then submerged in acetone for 60 s followed by a 2 h heat treatment at 75&#x00B0;C in an oven. The remaining collectors were considered as unsterile controls. Clean gelatin capsules were attached to each collector and a vacuum generated in the absence of any urediniospores. Each capsule was filled with 0.3 ml carrier oil which was sprayed, using a clean inoculator, onto one pot of Morocco seedlings.</p>
<p>In a mock inoculation treatment, six inoculators of each type and for each pathogen were used to spray 0.8 ml of a 0.5 mg urediniospore per ml oil suspension. Similar to the collectors, half of the inoculators were then submerged in acetone for 60 s and heat-treated at 75&#x00B0;C for 2 h. Using the treated and untreated inoculators, 0.3 ml clean carrier oil was sprayed per device onto one pot of Morocco seedlings. The infection frequency and number of pustules per leaf were recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>Data for spray delivery time, urediniospore deposition, and infection frequency of untreated AM and metal devices were analyzed for variance using NCSS v.8 statistical software. Since analysis of variance did not indicate any factor as a significant source of variation, data from duplicate experiments was pooled and no further mean separation tests applied.</p>
</sec>
</sec></sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<sec><title>Spray Time</title>
<p>According to analysis of variance neither device type (<italic>F</italic> = 1.15, <italic>P</italic> = 0.289), individual inoculator (<italic>F</italic> = 1.61, <italic>P</italic> = 0.139), replicates (<italic>F</italic> = 0.02, <italic>P</italic> = 0.886) nor experiments (<italic>F</italic> = 0.4, <italic>P</italic> = 0.528) significantly influenced results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The mean time for AM inoculators to deliver 0.8 ml carrier oil was 11.1 s as opposed to 10.6 s for the metal devices. Variable delivery times occurred for both device types with 8.1 to 15 s being recorded over replicates and experiments for AM inoculators and 7.1 to 14.9 s for metal inoculators (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Spray delivery time of and urediniospore deposition by inoculation devices produced by Additive Manufacturing (AM) in comparison with traditionally manufactured metal inoculators.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Criterion</th>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<th valign="top" align="center">Device type</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Variable<sup>1</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Range</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Spray time</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mean time (s)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.1 &#x2013; 15.0</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Metal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.1 &#x2013; 14.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Spore deposition</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Rust species<sup>2</sup></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mean no. spores per cm<sup>2</sup></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">102</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93 &#x2013; 115</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Metal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">108</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">70 &#x2013; 137</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pgt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">111</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80 &#x2013; 151</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Metal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">113</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69 &#x2013; 148</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic><sup>1</sup>According to analysis of variance for both spray time and spore deposition experiments no factors were significant sources of variation; <sup><italic>2</italic></sup><italic>Pt</italic>, <italic>Puccinia triticina</italic> and <italic>Pgt</italic>, <italic>P. graminis</italic> f. sp. tritici.</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec><title>Spore Deposition</title>
<p>No significant variation was revealed for rust species (<italic>F</italic> = 1.48, <italic>P</italic> = 0.234), device type (<italic>F</italic> = 0.36, <italic>P</italic> = 0.779), or replicates (<italic>F</italic> = 0.47, <italic>P</italic> = 0.5) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The mean of 102 <italic>Pt</italic> urediniospores deposited per cm<sup>2</sup> by an AM inoculator was statistically similar to the mean of 108 spores deposited by metal inoculators. Likewise, <italic>Pgt</italic> spore numbers per unit area were closely related for both device types, with 111 spores per cm<sup>2</sup> for AM atomizers and 113 for metal ones (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Over replicates and experiments, <italic>Pt</italic> spore numbers ranged from 93 to 115, and from 70 to 137 for AM and metal inoculators, respectively. For <italic>Pgt</italic>, counts ranged from 80 to 151, and 69 to 148 spores per cm<sup>2</sup> for the respective device types (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Handling Single-Pustule Isolates</title>
<p>The collection of a single rust pustule and the spray cloud discharged from an inoculator are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>. Deposition of urediniospores collected from a single pustule of either <italic>Pt</italic> or <italic>Pgt</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>) produced satisfactory and repeatable infection levels on wheat seedlings (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). When a single <italic>Pt</italic> pustule suspension of 0.3 ml was applied to one pot of wheat seedlings, a 100% infection frequency and minimum of 10 pustules per leaf were observed. Likewise, the application of 0.3 ml inoculum containing spores from a large, single <italic>Pgt</italic> pustule produced 15 or more pustules per leaf with all plants in a pot being infected.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Collection of urediniospores from a single pustule of <italic>Puccinia graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic> on a wheat leaf using a cyclone spore collector constructed with Additive Manufacturing (AM). The brass T-piece, which connects devices to either a vacuum or pressure pump, is also shown.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00639-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p>Discharge of light mineral oil by an inoculator constructed with AM. The brass T-piece, which connects devices to either a vacuum or pressure pump, is also shown.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00639-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption><p>Infection of a primary wheat leaf after inoculation of a differential set of 20 entries with a single pustule of <italic>P. graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic> using an inoculator produced with AM.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00639-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Efficiency of spore collectors and inoculation devices produced by AM in producing rust infection on wheat seedlings and verification of sterilization procedures in comparison with traditionally manufactured metal inoculators.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Criterion</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Rust species<sup>1</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Treatment<sup>2</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Device type</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Number of leaves<sup>3</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Infection frequency<sup>4</sup></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Minimum no. pustules per leaf</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Rust infection</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SPI / pot</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">248</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pgt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SPI / pot</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">268</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SPI / 4 pots</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">123</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pgt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SPI / 4 pots</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">113</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Bulk / 4 pots</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">310</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pgt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Bulk / 4 pots</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">364</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x00A0;&#x00A0;7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7"><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Device sterilization<sup>5</sup></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Pustule numbers per leaf</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="7"><hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Collector</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">146</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">149</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Metal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">155</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Metal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">144</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 &#x2013; 6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pgt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">147</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pgt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">144</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 &#x2013; 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pgt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Metal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">149</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pgt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Metal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">149</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 &#x2013; 3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Inoculator</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">145</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">148</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 &#x2013; 3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Metal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">145</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Metal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">147</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 &#x2013; 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pgt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">151</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pgt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">AM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">144</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2 &#x2013; 5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pgt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Treated</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Metal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">141</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>Pgt</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Metal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">144</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 &#x2013; 4</td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><italic><sup>1</sup><italic>Pt</italic>, <italic>Puccinia triticina</italic> and <italic>Pgt</italic>, <italic>P. graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic>; <sup><italic>2</italic></sup>SPI, single pustule isolate and bulk = bulk isolate; <sup><italic>3</italic></sup>Total number of wheat seedling leaves assessed over replications; <sup><italic>4</italic></sup>Percentage of wheat seedlings showing signs and symptoms of rust infection; <sup><italic>5</italic></sup>Sterilization consisted of submerging devices for 60 s in acetone followed by a 2 h heat treatment at 75&#x00B0;C. Collectors and devices not cleaned after exposure to urediniospores served as control treatments.</italic></attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In the simulated differential set distributed as 20 &#x201C;entries&#x201D; over four pots and sprayed with single pustules of either <italic>Pt</italic> or <italic>Pgt</italic> suspended in 0.8 ml oil, all seedling leaves were infected by both pathogens. The number of rust pustules was evenly distributed with a minimum of 4 and 5 pustules recorded per leaf for <italic>Pt</italic> and <italic>Pgt</italic>, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). In general, higher infection levels were obtained with <italic>Pt</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption><p><italic>Puccinia</italic> <italic>triticina</italic> infection obtained with an inoculator produced with AM.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-10-00639-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Handling Bulk Spore Collections</title>
<p>Application of 0.8 ml <italic>Pt</italic> inoculum at 1 mg spores / ml oil to four pots of Morocco seedlings, as would be used in a spore bulking exercise, resulted in a minimum of 29 pustules on a leaf but more than 40 on others. The stem rust spore multiplication test, using 0.8 ml of a 5 mg / ml suspension, ensued in 7 to 30 pustules per leaf. Similar to previous tests, a 100% leaf and stem rust incidence was obtained (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Sterilization</title>
<p>During validation of the sterilization process, leaf rust infection frequencies of 24.6 and 49.7% were obtained from spores accumulated in clean gelatin capsules attached to unsterile AM and metal collectors, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Contamination levels reached 1 to 6 pustules per seedling leaf. For <italic>Pgt</italic>, the infection frequencies resulting from used AM and metal collectors were 28.6 and 29.3%, with 1 to 3 contaminant pustules per leaf. When unsterile inoculators of both types were used to spray Morocco seedlings with clean oil, contamination ranging from 34.4 to 61.5% infected plants was observed amongst the <italic>Pt</italic> and <italic>Pgt</italic> treatments. Number of pustules varied between 1 and 5 per leaf. According to analysis of variance, infection frequency data obtained for unsterile collectors did not differ significantly for rust species (<italic>F</italic> = 0.84, <italic>P</italic> = 0.396) or device type (<italic>F</italic> = 2.08, <italic>P</italic> = 0.2). Similarly, infection data from unsterile inoculators was statistically alike for rust species (<italic>F</italic> = 2.34, <italic>P</italic> = 1.77) and device type (<italic>F</italic> = 1.9, <italic>P</italic> = 0.217). No infection sites were observed on seedlings sprayed with inoculators first submerged in acetone and then dried at 75&#x00B0;C for 2 h (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Discussion</title>
<p>Depending on infrastructure and standard operating procedures, research laboratories employ different systems when inoculating host plants with urediniospores of rust fungi. If spray-inoculation is preferred, spores could be suspended in water, isoparaffinic oil or engineered fluid. Alternatively, dry spores can be allowed to settle on plant surfaces by dusting or directly applied with a spatula or small brush.</p>
<p>Use of a spore-oil suspension, contained in a gelatin capsule and sprayed onto seedling leaves by means of a dedicated atomizer connected to an air pressure source, is favored by many rust laboratories due to ease of use, small amounts of inoculum required and consistency in infection levels. The uniform deposition of inoculum on seedling leaves by these venturi atomizers, which expel the suspension as a solid cone of fine droplets when pressurized air passes through a throat over the end of the fluid delivery tube, was emphasized by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Rowell (1985)</xref>. A further advantage is that the same capsule used for spore collection is used for inoculation after oil has been added. A disadvantage of the system, irrespective of whether conventional or AM devices are used, is that the gelatin capsules liquefy when they come into contact with water. However, 0.5 ml Eppendorf<sup>&#x00AE;</sup> microcentrifuge tubes fit the dimensions of the AM collector and inoculator and can be used with minimal alteration should fungal spores dispersed in water be a requirement. The AM devices could not be manufactured in a single step operation but required manual assembly of the copper tubes. In addition, for some inoculators it was necessary to clear the small delivery tube from presumably powder deposits. Although the PA 2200 material used in the production process features desirable strength and stiffness properties, chemical and heat resistance and consistent long-term behavior (see footnote 1), the durability of the AM devices needs to be verified after prolonged use.</p>
<p>The availability of a large quantity of collectors and inoculators is useful when many isolates need to be applied in a single session, such as in pathogen race typing experiments. In view of the re-emergence of wheat rusts on several continents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Olivera et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Singh et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Newcomb et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ali et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Olivera Firpo et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Lewis et al., 2018</xref>) several international laboratories are engaged in multi-isolate experiments where spore collection and inoculum application are done on a regular basis, reflecting the potential value of the equipment.</p>
<p>Despite their advantages, neither the cyclone collectors nor the atomizers are commercially available in South Africa. Local manufacturing by conventional milling from a solid metal block requires a specialized workshop and skilled personnel with consequent time and cost implications. Inoculators developed with AM did not differ significantly from the traditional metal devices in spray time or spore deposition. Using urediniospores from single rust pustules or bulk spore samples, AM devices were consistent in spore collection and infection of wheat seedlings and provide a viable alternative to metal devices originally obtained by means of a subtractive and labor intensive process. Similar to the procedure described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Browder (1971)</xref>, the operation of a collector or inoculator requires connection to a vacuum or pressure source, respectively. To facilitate these unions, a T-piece manufactured from brass was used in our experiments. The long end of the T-piece connects to the air source by means of rubber tubing, another fits into the tapered friction joint of the apparatus, whereas the third opening is closed manually when either suction or pressure is required.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>ZP conceptualized the idea. GB, JJ, and JE designed and manufactured the prototypes. WB, GM, and ZP conducted the validation tests.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conflict of Interest Statement</title>
<p>The design of the inoculator has been registered in Europe, United States, and South Africa. Neither the employing institutions nor any of the authors hold a patent on the devices described. Should a third party be interested in ordering any number of the devices, the University of the Free State and Central University of Technology will be reimbursed. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure">
<p><bold>Funding.</bold> The National Research Foundation is thanked for funding (UID 96099) during prototype development.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ack>
<p>The Directorate Research Development, University of the Free State, is thanked for registering the inoculator design.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodriguez-Algabal</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thach</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x00F8;rensen</surname> <given-names>C. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hansen</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lassen</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Yellow rust epidemics worldwide were caused by pathogen races from divergent genetic lineages.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>1067</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.01057</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28676811</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Browder</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1965</year>). <article-title>An atomizer for inoculating plants with spore-oil suspension.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Dis. Rep.</italic></source> <volume>49</volume>:<issue>455</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-94-2-0273B</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30754288</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Browder</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1971</year>). <article-title>Pathogenic specialization in cereal rust fungi, especially <italic>Puccinia recondita</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic>: concepts, methods of study and application.</article-title> <source><italic>Tech. Bull. U.S.Dep. Agric.</italic></source> <volume>1432</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elmansour</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dracatos</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Identification and characterization of seedling and adult plant resistance to <italic>Puccinia hordei</italic> in selected African barley germplasm.</article-title> <source><italic>Euphytica</italic></source> <volume>213</volume>:<issue>119</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10681-017-1902-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fetch</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitchell Fetch</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zegeye</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Races of <italic>Puccinia graminis</italic> on wheat, oat, and barley in Canada in 2009 and 2010.</article-title> <source><italic>Can. J. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>37</volume> <fpage>476</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>484</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gibson</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stucker</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <source><italic>Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Heidelberg</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Mech. Eng.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>215</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>243</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Knott</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <source><italic>The Wheat Rusts - Breeding for Resistance. Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>. <publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer Verlag</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kolmer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hughes</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Physiologic specialization of <italic>Puccinia triticina</italic> in the United States in 2009.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Dis.</italic></source> <volume>95</volume> <fpage>935</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>940</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-11-10-0786</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30732114</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hale</surname> <given-names>I. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herrera-Foessel</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Basnet</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Randhawa</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huerta-Espino</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Characterization and mapping of leaf rust and stripe rust resistance loci in hexaploid wheat lines UC1110 and PI610750 under Mexican environments.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>1450</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.01450</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28878791</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levy</surname> <given-names>G. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schindel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kruth</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Rapid manufacturing and rapid tooling with layer manufacturing (LM) technologies, state of the art and future perspectives.</article-title> <source><italic>CIRP Annals</italic></source> <volume>52</volume> <fpage>589</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>609</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60206-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Persoons</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bebber</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kigathi</surname> <given-names>R. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maintz</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Findlay</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Potential for re-emergence of wheat stem rust in the UK.</article-title> <source><italic>Commun. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>1</volume>:<issue>13</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s42003-018-0013-y</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30271900</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Newcomb</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olivera</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rouse</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szabo</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gale</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Kenyan isolates of <italic>Puccinia graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic> from 2008 to 2014: virulence to <italic>SrTmp</italic> in the Ug99 race group and implications for breeding programs.</article-title> <source><italic>Phytopathology</italic></source> <volume>106</volume> <fpage>729</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>736</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-12-15-0337-R</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27019064</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olivera</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newcomb</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szabo</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rouse</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gale</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of race TKTTF of <italic>Puccinia graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic> that caused a wheat stem rust epidemic in southern Ethiopia in 2013-14.</article-title> <source><italic>Phytopathology</italic></source> <volume>105</volume> <fpage>917</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>928</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-11-14-0302-FI</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25775107</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olivera Firpo</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newcomb</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flath</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sommerfeldt-Impe</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szabo</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carter</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Characterization of <italic>Puccinia graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic> isolates derived from an unusual wheat stem rust outbreak in Germany in 2013.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>66</volume> <fpage>1258</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1266</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppa.12674</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pretorius</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bender</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herselman</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prins</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Seedling resistance to stem rust race Ug99 and marker analysis for <italic>Sr2</italic>, <italic>Sr24</italic> and <italic>Sr31</italic> in South African wheat cultivars and lines.</article-title> <source><italic>Euphytica</italic></source> <volume>186</volume> <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10681-011-0476-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pretorius</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Visser</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Terefe</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herselman</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prins</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soko</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Races of <italic>Puccinia triticina</italic> detected on wheat in Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi and regional germplasm responses.</article-title> <source><italic>Austr. Plant Pathol.</italic></source> <volume>44</volume> <fpage>217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>224</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13313-014-0339-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roelfs</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saari</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <source><italic>Rust Diseases of Wheat: Concepts and Methods of Disease Management.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Mexico, DF</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CIMMYT</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rowell</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>&#x201C;Controlled infection by <italic>Puccinia graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic> under artificial conditions,&#x201D; in</article-title> <source><italic>The Cereal Rusts</italic></source> <volume>Vol. 1</volume> <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Bushnell</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roelfs</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Orlando, FL</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press Inc.</publisher-name>), <fpage>283</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>321</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hodson</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lagudah</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayliffe</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhavani</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Emergence and spread of new races of wheat stem rust fungus: continued threat to food security and prospects of genetic control.</article-title> <source><italic>Phytopathology</italic></source> <volume>105</volume> <fpage>872</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>884</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-01-15-0030-FI</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26120730</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>S&#x00F8;rensen</surname> <given-names>C. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thach</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hovm?ller</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of spray and point inoculation methods for the phenotyping of <italic>Puccinia striiformis</italic> on wheat.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Dis.</italic></source> <volume>100</volume> <fpage>1064</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1070</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-12-15-1477-RE</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30682276</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sossou</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Demoly</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montavon</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gomes</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>An additive manufacturing oriented design approach to mechanical assemblies.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Comp. Des. Eng.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jcde.2017.11.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Steffenson</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Case</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pretorius</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coetzee</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kloppers</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Potential vulnerability of barley to African pathotypes of <italic>Puccinia graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic> and sources of resistance.</article-title> <source><italic>Phytopathology</italic></source> <volume>107</volume> <fpage>950</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>962</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/phyto-11-16-0400-r</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28398875</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Terefe</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Visser</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pretorius</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Variation in <italic>Puccinia graminis</italic> f. sp. <italic>tritici</italic> detected on wheat and triticale in South Africa from 2009 to 2013.</article-title> <source><italic>Crop Prot.</italic></source> <volume>86</volume> <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2016.04.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weller</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kleer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Piller</surname> <given-names>F. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Economic implications of 3D printing: market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Prod. Econ.</italic></source> <volume>164</volume> <fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wohler</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Campbell</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diegel</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kowen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caffrey</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <source><italic>3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, State of the Industry, Annual Worldwide Progress Report.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Fort Collins, CO</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Wohlers Associates, Inc.</publisher-name></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn01"><label>1</label><p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.eos.info/">https://www.eos.info/</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>
