Abstract
The ubiquitin system is essential for multiple hormone signaling pathways in plants. Here, we show that the Arabidopsis thaliana E3 ligase BRIZ, a heteromeric ligase that consists minimally of BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 proteins, functions in abscisic acid (ABA) signaling or response. briz1 and briz2 homozygous mutants either fail to germinate or emerge later than wild-type seedlings, with little cotyledon expansion or root elongation and no visible greening. Viability staining indicates that briz1 and briz2 embryos are alive but growth-arrested. Germination of briz mutants is improved by addition of the carotenoid biosynthetic inhibitor fluridone or gibberellic acid (GA3), and briz mutants have improved development in backgrounds deficient in ABA synthesis (gin1-3/aba2) or signaling (abi5-7). Endogenous ABA is not higher in briz2 seeds compared to wild-type seeds, and exogenous ABA does not affect BRIZ mRNAs in imbibed seeds. These results indicate that briz embryos are hypersensitive to ABA and that under normal growth conditions, BRIZ acts to suppress ABA signaling or response. ABA signaling and sugar signaling are linked, and we found that briz1 and briz2 mutants excised from seed coats are hypersensitive to sucrose. Although briz single mutants do not grow to maturity, we were able to generate mature briz2-3 abi5-7 double mutant plants that produced seeds. These seeds are more sensitive to exogenous sugar and are larger than seeds from sibling abi5-7 BRIZ2/briz2-3 plants, suggesting that BRIZ has a parental effect on seed development. From these data, we propose a model in which the BRIZ E3 ligase suppresses ABA responses during seed maturation and germination and early seedling establishment.
Introduction
The ubiquitin system is a post-translational protein modification system in which E1, E2, and E3 enzymes catalyze the attachment of one or more ubiquitins to substrate proteins. E3s, or ubiquitin ligases, facilitate the transfer of activated ubiquitin from an E2 to the substrate, either directly or by forming a thioester bond with the ubiquitin prior to its transfer to the substrate. E3s are the key specificity components in ubiquitination of substrate proteins and therefore their presence and activity are important points of regulation. Additional proteins in the ubiquitin system modulate the activity, localization, or abundance of ubiquitinated proteins (Oh et al., 2018), remove ubiquitin, or modulate the above processes. In plants, the ubiquitin system affects multiple developmental and environmental responses and hormone signaling pathways (reviewed in Vierstra, 2011; Sadanandom et al., 2012; Gibbs et al., 2014; Kelley, 2018; Miricescu et al., 2018), including the abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthetic and signaling pathways (reviewed in Liu and Stone, 2011; Yu et al., 2016; Jurkiewicz and Batoko, 2018; Zhang et al., 2019).
Abscisic acid is a hormone that affects many aspects of plant development and stress responses (reviewed in Finkelstein, 2013; Yoshida et al., 2019). It influences embryo development, seed maturation, dormancy, germination, growth, senescence, and allows plants to respond appropriately to drought, salinity, and pathogens. The ABA biosynthetic gene GLUCOSE INSENSITIVE 1 (GIN1, also called ABA DEFICIENT 2, ABA2) encodes a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase enzyme that converts xanthoxin to ABA aldehyde, and mutants have reduced ABA levels (Cheng et al., 2002; González-Guzmán et al., 2002). The canonical ABA signaling pathway (reviewed in Cutler et al., 2010) begins with ABA perception by PYRABACTIN/PYRABACTIN-LIKE (PYR/PYL) proteins, followed by inhibition of clade A type 2C protein phosphatases (PP2Cs). Sucrose non-fermenting related-1 (SnRK) 2 type kinases previously held in check by PP2Cs are subsequently activated and can phosphorylate downstream targets including bZIP transcription factors such as ABI5 (Zhang et al., 2019) or ion channels in guard cells (Munemasa et al., 2015). The Raf-like kinase RAF10 interacts with PP2Cs and phosphorylates SnRK2s and several downstream transcription factors (Nguyen et al., 2019), and multiple other Raf-like kinases are important for SnRK2 phosphorylation and ABA responses (Lin et al., 2020). Additionally, the glycogen kinase-like protein BRASSINOSTERIOD INSENSITIVE 2 (BIN2) phosphorylates PP2Cs (Cai et al., 2014), suggesting that Raf-like and BIN2 kinases modulate the core ABA signaling pathway.
Abscisic acid signaling is also regulated by the ubiquitin system, and dozens of E3 ligases involved have been identified (reviewed in Yu et al., 2016). The substrate binding subunit of a CULLIN4-type E3 ligase, DDA1 (for DET1-, DDB1-ASSOCIATED1), interacts with PYLs 4, 8, and 9 in vivo and facilitates the proteasomal degradation of PYL8 (Irigoyen et al., 2014). RING FINGER OF SEED LONGEVITY (RSL1) is a plasma membrane E3 that regulates intracellular trafficking of PYL4 (Bueso et al., 2014). The E3s PUB12 and PUB13 target the PP2C ABI1 for degradation (Kong et al., 2015), and the E3s RGLG1 and RGLG5 ubiquitinate the PP2Cs PP2CA, ABI2, and HAB2 in vitro and regulate their abundance in vivo (Wu et al., 2016). PHLOEM PROTEIN 2-B11 (PP2-B11) is an F-box protein in an SCF-type E3 that targets the kinase SnRK2.3 for degradation (Cheng et al., 2017).
Components downstream of SnRK2 kinases are also modulated by the ubiquitin system. The E3 RHA2b ubiquitinates MYB30, a transcription factor that negatively regulates ABA signaling, in vitro, interacts with it in vivo, and affects its accumulation in plants (Zheng et al., 2018). The E3 AIP2 (ABI3-interacting protein) ubiquitinates the transcription factor ABI3 in vitro and reduces its levels in vivo (Zhang et al., 2005). Loss of the E3 DESPIERTO results in decreased ABI3 and ABI4 expression during seed development, reduced ABA sensitivity during germination, and loss of dormancy (Barrero et al., 2010). LOSS OF GDU2 (LOG2, also referred to as AIRP3) binds to and monoubiquitinates the mature form of RD21, a drought-induced cysteine protease, in vitro, and LOG2 loss-of-function mutants are ABA hyposensitive (Kim and Kim, 2013).
Many E3s that affect ABA signaling do not have identified substrates to date. Reduced expression of the E3 RING-H2 FINGER A (RHA2a) or over-expression with the 35S promoter result in diminished or enhanced ABA responses, respectively (Bu et al., 2009). TUBBY9 encodes an F-box protein, a substrate-specificity subunit of the CUL1-based E3 ligases, and loss-of-function mutants have reduced ABA sensitivity, while TUBBY9 over-expression results in ABA hypersensitivity (Lai et al., 2004). RING DOMAIN AND DOMAIN-OF-UNKNOWN-FUNCTION 1 and 2 (RDUF1 and RDUF2) loss-of-function mutants are ABA-hyposensitive (Kim et al., 2012).
ABI5 is a bZIP transcription factor with a major role in seed germination (Lopez-Molina et al., 2001, and reviewed in Skubacz et al., 2016). The first loss-of-function allele, abi5-1, was recovered in a screen for ABA-resistant germination in Arabidopsis thaliana (Finkelstein, 1994). Characterization of multiple loss-of-function abi5 alleles indicates that plants lacking ABI5 are not phenotypically different from wild-type plants in the absence of exogenous ABA, including in their stomatal responses under low water potential conditions (Finkelstein, 1994; Nambara et al., 2002). ABI5 protein is highest in dry seeds (Piskurewicz et al., 2008) and its abundance is modulated by multiple E3 ligases. KEEP ON GOING (KEG) encodes an E3 whose loss-of-function mutants accumulate ABI5 protein and are hypersensitive to ABA (Stone et al., 2006). Recombinant KEG ubiquitinates ABI5 in vitro (Liu and Stone, 2010). The E3 CUL4-based substrate specificity factors DWA1 and 2 (DWD hypersensitive to ABA1 and 2) function in ABA signaling and negatively affect ABI5 levels in vivo (Lee et al., 2010a). HYPERSENSITIVE DCAF 1 (ABD1) is another substrate receptor of a CUL4-based ligase that interacts with ABI5 and plays a role in ABI5 degradation (Seo et al., 2014).
Loss-of-function mutants of many of the E3s described above have phenotypes that are modest or only visible under exogenous ABA treatment, with the exception of keg mutants, which grow slowly and have arrested growth after developing one set of true leaves (Stone et al., 2006). In addition to ABI5, KEG is implicated in degradation of other bZIP transcription factors (Chen et al., 2013) and is involved in intracellular trafficking and pathogen responses (Gu and Innes, 2012). These additional functions likely contribute to the keg loss-of-function phenotype.
Previously, we identified T-DNA insertion mutations in genes encoding two related E3 proteins called BRIZ1 (for BRAP2-RING-Znf Domain) and BRIZ2 (Hsia and Callis, 2010). Homozygous T-DNA insertion lines of either BRIZ gene have the same severe phenotype of post-germination growth arrest, suggesting that both proteins are required for the same processes. We reported that BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 proteins preferentially form heteromers in vitro and are found in the same complex in vivo (Hsia and Callis, 2010). Using a complementation assay, we showed that wild-type RING domains of each protein and the BRIZ1-BRIZ2 interaction domain are required for in vivo function (Hsia and Callis, 2010). We proposed that BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 function as subunits of a heteromeric E3 ligase.
Here, we further characterize the phenotype of loss-of-function briz mutants and provide evidence that BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 suppress ABA signaling in germination and early seedling growth. briz mutants do not have elevated endogenous ABA levels and their germination is hypersensitive to exogenous ABA. Reduction of ABA with a biosynthetic inhibitor allows some post-germination growth of briz embryos. briz2 mutants exhibit improved germination and growth in abi5-7 or gin1-3 mutant backgrounds that have deficiencies in ABA signaling or synthesis, respectively. Similarly, briz1 mutants exhibit increased germination in the abi5-7 background. We also show that some briz2-3 abi5-7 double mutants are able to grow to maturity and set seed. Seeds from briz2-3 abi5-7 plants are hypersensitive to sucrose and glucose. These data support a model where the BRIZ E3 complex functions to suppress ABA responses during seed germination and post-germination seedling growth.
Materials and Methods
Plant Material and Growth Conditions
Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Col-0 (CS70000), briz1-1 (At2g42160, SALK_085207), briz2-1 (At2g26000, SALK_094761), briz2-2 (At2g26000, SALK_151060), briz2-3 (At2g26000, FLAG_122B09), and gin1-3 (At1g52340, CS6147) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center in Columbus, Ohio1 and the briz lines were back-crossed at least four times to Col-0. The abi5-7 allele (At2g36270, E74-1) as described in Nambara et al. (2002) was first obtained from Eiji Nambara and later re-acquired from Ruth Finkelstein (UC Santa Barbara).
Seeds were surface-sterilized in a solution of 25% commercial bleach and 0.1% Triton-X100 (Sigma, 93443) for 10 min, rinsed with sterile H2O, and stratified at 4°C for at least 24 hours (h) before plating. For bacto-agar-grown seedlings, seeds were plated on solid growth media (GM) consisting of 4.3 g/L Murashige and Skoog basal salt mixture (Sigma, M 5524), 1% sucrose (Fisher Scientific), 0.5 g/L MES (Calbiochem 475893), 1X B vitamins (0.5 μg/ml nicotinic acid, 1 μg/ml thiamine, 0.5 μg/ml pyridoxine, and 0.1 μg/ml myo-inositol, all from Sigma), and 8 g/L BD Bacto Agar (Fisher Scientific), pH 5.7. After 2 weeks at room temperature under constant light, seedlings were transplanted from agar GM plates to soil and plants were grown at 20°C with 50% humidity and 16 h light/8 h dark.
Growth Media Modifications
A 100 mM fluridone (Chem Service, Inc. N-13217) stock in DMSO was diluted in GM to a final concentration of 100 μM. A 1 M brassinolide (BL; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-391736) stock in DMSO was diluted in GM to a final concentration of 10 μM. Plates with 0.1% DMSO were used as solvent controls for fluridone and BL plates. A 10 mM ABA (Sigma, A-1049) stock in ethanol was diluted in GM to a final concentration of 0.1 μM. A 100 mM gibberellic acid (GA3; Sigma, G-7645) stock in ethanol was diluted in GM to final concentrations of 10, 100, 200, or 1 mM. A 1 M aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid (ACC; Sigma, A-3903) stock in ethanol was diluted in GM to a final concentration of 50 μM. A 50 mM 2,4D (Sigma, D-8407) stock in ethanol was diluted in GM to a final concentration of 1 μM. Plates with 0.1% EtOH were used as solvent controls for ABA, GA3, 2,4-D, and ACC plates. GM plates with mannitol or glucose contained 1% mannitol or 1% glucose instead of 1% sucrose.
Genotyping
Primers sequences for PCR genotyping are listed in Supplementary Table S1. For briz1-1 lines, primer 9-097 was used with primer 9-098 to produce a WT gene-specific product, and primer 9-098 was used with the T-DNA left border primer 9-001 to produce a T-DNA junction product. For briz2-1 lines, primer 6-674 was used with primer 6-675 to produce a WT gene-specific product, and primer 6-675 used with the T-DNA left border primer 9-001 to produce a T-DNA junction product. For briz2-2 and briz2-3 lines, primer 6-981 was used with primer 6-982 to produce a WT gene-specific product. For briz2-2 lines, primer 6-982 was used with the T-DNA left border primer 9-001 to produce a T-DNA junction product. For briz2-3 lines, primer 6-982 was used with the T-DNA left border primer 8-133 to produce a T-DNA junction product. For abi5-7 lines, a dCAPs reaction was used. After amplification with primers abi5-7dCAPS-F and abi5-7dCAPS-R, products were digested with HinfI and separated by 3% agarose gel electrophoresis. A second HinfI site is present only in the abi5-7 allele. For gin1-3 lines, products generated with primers 6-745 and 6-746 were separated by 3% agarose gel electrophoresis. The gin1-3 allele has a 50 bp deletion and these primers span the deletion site, making a shorter PCR product. PCR genotyping was used to identify F2-F4 individuals of the specified genotype.
SCR/Germination Experiment
Age-matched seeds were used and were ~7 months post-harvest and the results were similar for seeds ~2 weeks post-harvest. Seed status was assessed at the designated times using forceps and a dissecting microscope in a sterile hood to be able to rotate each seed to see seed coat rupture (SCR) and radicle emergence (germination). The data represent the mean of three independent experiments, with three replicas of ~50 seeds per genotype per experiment.
Viability Staining
Seeds from BRIZ1/briz1-1, BRIZ2/briz2-1, and BRIZ2/briz2-2 plants were plated on GM plates and grown in a controlled environment (constant light, 22°C) for 15 or 30 days. Embryos that emerged from the seed coat were selected for the experiment. Sytox Orange nucleic acid stain in DMSO (Invitrogen, S11368) was diluted in water to a working concentration of 250 nM. Fluorescein diacetate (FDA) powder (Invitrogen, F1303) was dissolved in acetone to make a 5 mg/ml stock, then diluted in water to a working concentration of 5 μg/ml. Embryos were either left untreated or were heat-treated at 98°C for 5 min. Embryos were stained for 10–15 min before imaging with an Olympus Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (model FV5-LDPSU). Sytox stained seedlings were imaged using the 10x lens and filter with laser excitation at 543 nm. FDA stained seedlings were imaged using the 10x lens and filter with laser excitation at 488 nm.
ABA Determination
The two silenced lines were the T2 generation from two independent briz2-1 lines initially complemented by expressing Myc-BRIZ2 protein (Hsia and Callis, 2010). Initially with 100% germination in a homozygous briz2-1 background, progeny from some individuals showed 0% germination. Seeds were soaked in water for 1 h at room temperature and water was removed before flash freezing. ABA levels were then determined by the Danforth Center, St. Louis, MO2 as described in Chen et al. (2009) with D6ABA used as an internal standard. A mix of D6ABA and ABA were used for a standard curve.
Embryo Excisions
Embryo excisions were performed as described in Lee et al. (2010b) and shown in Lee and Lopez-Molina (2013). Excised embryos were placed on sterilized 60 μM nylon net filters (Millipore #NY6002500) on top of GM solid media and photographed using a dissecting microscope. To identify briz1-1 and briz2-3 seeds, which are indistinguishable from wild-type at the dry seed stage, seeds from heterozygous BRIZ1/briz1-1 or BRIZ2/briz2-3 plants were plated on the appropriate growth media, and seeds that had not germinated after 48 h were selected for excision. Age-matched seeds were used.
SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting
For visualization of Myc-BRIZ2 protein, seeds were plated on GM plates and stratified at 4°C for 24 h, then ground in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, and one EDTA-free protease inhibitor tablet (Roche, 1836153)/10 ml. Bio-Rad Protein Assay was used to quantify total protein. About 50 μg total protein was loaded on a 9% polyacrylamide gel for SDS-PAGE separation, and then transferred to a PVDF-P membrane (Immobilon). Membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat powdered milk (Carnation or Sunny Select from local grocery stores) dissolved in TBS + 0.1% Tween 20 (Sigma, P1379). Myc-tagged proteins were detected with Anti-Myc-mouse (Roche # 11667149001) followed by the secondary antibody peroxidase-conjugated AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L; Jackson ImmunoResearch) at a dilution of 1:10,000. SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific) was used as a chemiluminescent substrate. Chemiluminescence was captured on X-ray film (Phenix).
For visualizing endogenous ABI5 protein, abi5-7 seeds (dry), Col seeds (dry, stratified at 4°C for 24 h, or stratified at 4°C for 24 h and then plated on GM and grown under constant light at 22°C for the indicated times), and briz1-1 and briz2-3 seeds (stratified at 4°C for 24 h and then plated on GM and grown under constant light at 22°C for 72 h and identified by their non-germination) were ground in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM PMSF, 50 μM MG132 (Peptides International), and one EDTA-free protease inhibitor tablet (Roche, 1836153)/10 ml. Lysates were collected after centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and total protein concentrations were measured with Bio-Rad Protein Assay. About 25 μg total protein per sample was loaded on a 10% polyacrylamide gel for SDS-PAGE, and then transferred to a PVDF-P membrane (Immobilon). Membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat powdered milk dissolved in TBS + 0.1% Tween 20, as described above. ABI5 protein was detected with anti-ABI5 (gift from R. Vierstra, WU-STL) at a dilution of 1:5,000 followed by the secondary antibody peroxidase-conjugated AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L; Jackson ImmunoResearch) at a dilution of 1:10,000. ProSignal Dura (Prometheus # 20-301) was used as a chemiluminescent substrate. Chemiluminescence was digitally imaged in the linear range of detection using the ImageQuant LAS400 imaging system (GE).
Seed Size Measurements and Protein Comparison
For seed size measurements (Supplementary Figure S7), seeds were placed on double-sided tape on a microscope slide and photographed through a dissecting microscope. BRIZ2/briz2-3 abi5-7 and BRIZ2/briz2-3 ABI5 were siblings from the cross used to generate the briz2-3 abi5-7 double mutant plants. Seed length was measured using Image J. For seed weight measurements, for each genotype, three groups of 100 seeds were weighed. For embryo size measurements, embryos were excised as described above and measured using Image J. Measurements were analyzed using GraphPad Prism.
RNA Extraction and Quantitative PCR
Seedlings were grown in liquid GM under constant light for 6 days and treated with 50 μM ABA or 0.1% ethanol as mock treatment for 6 h. Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, 74903) according to manufacturer’s instructions. About 2.4 μg of total RNA was used in a 20 μl reverse transcription reaction performed with Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, 18080-044). Real-time PCR amplification was performed with 50 μl of reaction solution containing 1 μl of first-strand cDNA, 10 pmoles of each primer, and 1x SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, A46109). Relative transcript levels were obtained using the comparative Ct method. The experiment was performed independently three times with three technical replicates each time.
Results
briz Seeds Are Defective in Seed Coat Rupture and Germination, but briz Embryos Are Alive
Previously we briefly described the effects of loss-of-function T-DNA insertions in BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 in Arabidopsis (Hsia and Callis, 2010). Here, we more closely analyze the behavior of briz homozygous seeds over time and assess their ability to initiate SCR separately from radicle emergence. SCR typically occurs before radicle emergence, with the latter process generally acknowledged as germination (reviewed in Holdsworth et al., 2008). Examples of the three phenotypic classes quantified in Figures 1A–E are shown in Figure 1F: no SCR, no radicle; SCR; and SCR, radicle. Under our growth conditions, age-matched wild-type (Col) seeds rapidly transverse through SCR and complete germination by 48 h (Figure 1A, “SCR, Radicle” class). Seeds from plants heterozygous for a T-DNA insertion in the coding region of either BRIZ1 (briz1-1) or BRIZ2 (briz2-1, -2, and -3) segregate for two strikingly different phenotypes in a 3:1 ratio. Three-fourths of the seeds exhibit a wild-type phenotype, largely completing SCR and germination by 48 h at 20°C. However, one-quarter of the seeds fail to exhibit SCR even after 7 days (Figures 1B–E, “No SCR, No radicle” class). Between 7 and 14 days, a few seeds exhibit SCR (although it is often abnormal, with ruptures randomly across the surface rather than directly along the root axis), and some of these continue on to germinate. However, these germinated seedlings do not accumulate visible levels of chlorophyll, their cotyledons fail to expand and reflex, and root elongation is minimal (Figures 1G,H). The briz mutant phenotype referred to in this work includes both non-germinated seeds, seeds with SCR only, and the pale, undeveloped, late germinating embryos shown in Figures 1G,H. All briz1-1, briz2-1, briz2-2, or briz2-3 single mutants exhibit strongly delayed SCR and when germination occurs, have phenotypically similar seedlings that fail to progress in development.
Figure 1
We hypothesized that the briz phenotype may result from embryo cell death and that passive absorbance of water could be sufficient for delayed SCR and late embryo protrusion from the seed coat. We used Sytox orange and FDA staining (Truernit and Haseloff, 2008) to test the viability of briz seedlings. Sytox orange penetrates non-viable cells and stains nuclei. FDA enters living cells and is converted to a fluorescent compound, fluorescein, by cytosolic esterases. Before staining and confocal microscopy, embryos were either left untreated or were killed with a brief 98°C heat treatment. As expected, control Col embryos did not stain with Sytox orange unless they were heat-treated (Figures 2T vs. S). Untreated Col embryos stained with FDA (Figure 2U), while heat-treated Col embryos did not (Figure 2V). These results show that cells in Col embryos are alive unless they are killed with heat treatment. Col seeds used in the experiment were soaked for a few hours in water because these seeds are morphologically similar to 15-day-old briz seeds.
Figure 2
Seeds from BRIZ1/briz1-1, BRIZ2/briz2-1, or BRIZ2/briz2-2 plants were plated on GM for either 15 or 30 days before briz embryos were collected. Like Col embryos, 15-day-old briz1 and briz2 embryos did not stain with Sytox orange (Figures 2D–F) unless they were heat-treated prior to staining (Figures 2A–C). Untreated briz1 and briz2 embryos stained with FDA (Figures 2G–I). These results show that cells in 15-day-old briz1 and briz2 embryos are alive unless they are killed with heat treatment. The same tests were performed on 30-day-old briz embryos. Similar to 15-day-old embryos, 30-day-old briz1 and briz2 embryos were primarily Sytox orange negative (Figures 2M–O) unless heat-treated first (Figures 2J–L), and untreated embryos were FDA positive (Figures 2P–R). These results indicate that cells are alive in 30-day-old briz embryos even though the embryos are arrested at the germination/post-germination stage.
The briz Phenotype Can Be Partially Rescued by the Carotenoid Biosynthetic Inhibitor Fluridone, and the Mutant Phenotype Returns With Addition of Low Levels of ABA
Environmental conditions were sought that would promote germination and/or growth of briz embryos. Because single homozygous briz individuals cannot be grown to maturity for seed production, all studies were conducted on seeds from selfed heterozygous BRIZ/briz parents. When seeds from BRIZ1/briz1-1 or BRIZ2/briz2-2 plants were plated on GM alone or on GM containing the solvent controls DMSO or ethanol, ~0.25 of the seeds exhibited the briz phenotype (Figure 3; Supplementary Figure S1), as expected for the segregation of a single recessive trait (also see Figure 1). Chi-square goodness of fit tests confirmed that phenotypic segregation of seeds from heterozygous BRIZ1/briz1-1 and BRIZ2/briz2-2 plants fit an expectation of 3:1 wild-type:briz, with p-values of 0.18 and 0.35, respectively (n = ~220 seed).
Figure 3
We tested the effects of light or various additions/modifications to GM plates and predicted that conditions that rescued the briz phenotype would reduce the fraction of seeds with a typical briz phenotype. This fraction was unaffected by incubating the plates at RT in the dark (Figures 3A,B). Neither the absence of sucrose nor the addition of mannitol had a significant effect on the fraction of briz seedlings (Figures 3A,B). Similarly, the fraction of briz seedlings was unaffected by addition of the synthetic auxin 2,4,dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4 D), the ethylene precursor ACC, or BL (Figures 3A,B; see Supplementary Figure S1 for example of BL plates). The results were the same for seeds segregating for either briz1-1 (Figure 3A) or briz2-2 (Figure 3B).
By contrast, addition of fluridone, a carotenoid biosynthetic inhibitor that also blocks ABA biosynthesis (Bartels and Watson, 1978), resulted in a significant reduction of phenotypically briz embryos (Figures 3A,B). Similar results were observed for a second briz2 allele, with seeds from a BRIZ2/briz2-1 parent (Supplementary Figure S2; for examples of plates for all mutants, see Supplementary Figure S3A, which are non-green because of insufficient chlorophyll-protecting carotenoids, resulting in photo-oxidative damage to chlorophylls, Bartels and Watson, 1978). These results demonstrate that fluridone promotes further development of homozygous briz seedlings. However, few briz seedlings had expanded visible true leaves, and those that did were smaller than their wild-type siblings, indicating that suppression of the briz phenotype was incomplete.
To determine whether fluridone’s ability to suppress the briz phenotype is caused by a reduction in endogenous ABA and not a reduction in some other carotenoid-related metabolite, we tested the effect of including 0.1 μM ABA in the GM plates in addition to fluridone. While this concentration of ABA did not inhibit germination of wild-type Col seeds (Supplementary Figure S3B), it strongly affected germination of a subset of seeds from BRIZ/briz parents. Around 25% of the seeds failed to germinate and looked identical to the briz seeds grown on GM plates (Figure 3). These results suggest that the growth-promoting effect of fluridone on briz seeds results from lowering endogenous ABA levels, not from affecting the levels of other products derived from the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway.
briz Seeds Do Not Hyper-Accumulate ABA
briz seeds phenotypically resemble wild-type seeds plated on a high concentration of exogenous ABA (Leung et al., 1994). One possible explanation for the strong growth-arrested phenotype (Figures 1, 2) and hypersensitivity to added ABA (Figure 3) seen in briz mutants could be an elevated level of endogenous ABA. To test whether briz seeds have higher (ABA) than wild-type seeds, we measured (ABA) in two lines whose progeny exhibited a 100% briz phenotype. These lines arose from two independent transgenic lines that initially expressed an epitope tagged form of BRIZ2 (Myc-BRIZ2) in the briz2-1 background (Hsia and Callis, 2010). In subsequent generations, 100% of the seeds exhibited the briz phenotype, suggesting that both the endogenous BRIZ2 gene and the Myc-BRIZ2 transgene had silenced. Western blots of seed protein extracts verified that non-germinating seeds from one line (S, for silenced) did not express Myc-BRIZ2 protein encoded by the transgene, while Myc-BRIZ2 protein was readily visible in an independent line that carried the same transgene and exhibited 100% germination (Figure 4A). Seeds from the two silenced lines and age-matched Col were hydrated for 1 h, after which ABA content was determined. briz seeds did not have a significantly higher level of ABA than the wild-type control, and in fact S1 had a slightly lower ABA level (Figure 4B). Analysis of ABA content in briz1-1 seeds was not possible because we could not obtain silenced lines in the briz1-1 mutant background that gave the 100% briz seeds needed for the analysis. Altogether these data suggest that briz embryos do not hyper-accumulate ABA, and that briz embryos are hypersensitive to both endogenous and exogenous ABA.
Figure 4
ABA Does Not Affect BRIZ mRNA in Seedlings
To evaluate whether ABA affects BRIZ expression, we used qPCR to measure relative BRIZ mRNA levels in 6-day-old Col seedlings treated with for 6 h with ABA. Exogenous ABA induces robust transcriptional responses at this developmental stage (Lopez-Molina et al., 2001). Expression of RD29A, a well-known ABA-responsive gene (Nakashima et al., 2006), increased by approximately ~100-fold after ABA treatment, indicating a strong response to ABA (Figure 4C). However, neither BRIZ1 nor BRIZ2 mRNA levels were affected by ABA treatment (Figure 4C).
briz2-2 gin1-3 Double Mutants Have Increased Germination, Greening, and Growth
To test whether the briz phenotype can be suppressed if endogenous ABA is reduced genetically, BRIZ2/briz2-2 plants were crossed with ABA-deficient gin1-3 plants. GIN1 (also called ABA2) encodes a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase enzyme involved in ABA biosynthesis (Cheng et al., 2002). gin1-3 is a null allele with a deletion in the second exon which results in an early stop codon, and gin1-3 plants have low levels of endogenous ABA (Cheng et al., 2002). Seeds from plants homozygous for gin1-3 and heterozygous for BRIZ2/briz2-2 were plated on GM and they segregated for a reduced fraction of seeds/seedlings with a briz phenotype (χ2 = 29, p < 0.0001 for 3:1 WT:briz) compared to seeds from BRIZ2/briz2-2 heterozygous plants (χ2 = 0.007, p = 0.93). Seeds from a gin1-3 single mutant sibling had nearly 100% germination and greening (Supplementary Figure S4A). Exogenous ABA restored the 3:1 ratio of WT:briz phenotype in the seeds from BRIZ2/briz2-2 gin1-3 plants (χ2 = 0.06, p = 0.8; Supplementary Figure S4A), indicating that low ABA resulting from the gin1-3 mutation allowed the additional growth of briz mutants. briz2-2 gin1-3 seeds were identified by their slower germination and growth (circled in red, Figure 5A). After 2 weeks, an average of 92.3% of the briz2-2 gin1-3 mutants had greened (Figure 5B) and most had developed true leaves (Figures 5C,D). However, briz2-2 gin1-3 plants remained small and most eventually died on the GM plates or wilted quickly and died after they were transplanted to soil. The loss of GIN1 likely contributed to the poor survival of the double mutants because gin1-3 single mutants are smaller than wild-type plants and wilt quickly (Cheng et al., 2002) and were challenging to grow to maturity under our growth conditions. A few plants that were transplanted to soil were verified by PCR to be homozygous for briz2-2 (Supplementary Figure S4). These results show that a reduction in endogenous ABA allows further development of briz2-2 seedlings and support the hypothesis that briz2-2 seedlings are growth arrested due to ABA hypersensitivity.
Figure 5
In the gin1-3 Background, Heterozygous BRIZ1/briz1-1 Plants Produce More Underdeveloped Seeds Than Their WT BRIZ Sibs
BRIZ1/briz1-1 plants were also crossed with gin1-3 plants, and seeds from plants homozygous for gin1-3 and heterozygous for BRIZ1/briz1-1 were plated on GM. All 80 seeds germinated and looked wild-type. This was surprising, as we expected approximately 25% (the briz1-1 homozygotes) to have a slow growth phenotype similar to briz2-2 gin1-3 double mutants (see Figure 5). All seedlings were genotyped and only three possible briz1-1 homozygotes were identified (Supplementary Figure S5A). These numbers do not fit the expected ratio of 1:2:1 WT:het:mutant for BRIZ1 (X2 = 28.189, p < 0.0001). Instead, they fit a ratio of 1:2 WT:het (X2 = 0.311, p = 0.577), with the briz1-1 gin 1-3 double mutant seeds frequency much reduced. Both male and female homozygous briz1-1 gametophytes are still viable in the gin1-3 background (if either gametophyte is not viable, a 1:1 WT:het ratio would be expected, and these data do not fit that ratio, with X2 = 8.165 and p = 0.004). In a larger plating of 300 seeds, only 12 seeds did not germinate (presumably homozygotes for briz1-1), well below the expected number of 75. These results suggest that many homozygous briz1-1 seeds in the gin1-3 background do not develop to the mature seed stage.
To investigate why there were fewer than expected briz1-1 homozygotes, we examined siliques of heterozygous BRIZ1/briz1-1 plants in the gin1-3 background. Siliques of BRIZ1/briz1-1 gin1-3 plants contained more undeveloped or collapsed seeds (40.2%) than gin1-3 plants that were wild-type for BRIZ1 (24.6%; Supplementary Figure S5B). gin1-3 single mutants have defects in seed development and have many undeveloped seeds (Cheng et al., 2002), so our observation of 24.6% undeveloped seeds in gin1-3 plants that were wild-type for BRIZ1 was not surprising. These results suggest that in addition to seed loss due to gin1-3, many homozygous briz1-1 mutant seeds in the siliques of heterozygous BRIZ1/briz1-1 plants do not develop.
Despite the lower than expected number of homozygous briz1-1 seeds, we were able to identify one homozygous briz1-1 seedling (Supplementary Figures S5C,D). The seed took more than 1 week to germinate, and development was very slow (the photo in Supplementary Figure S5C was taken 26 days after plating). The seedling eventually developed four true leaves but died after it was transplanted to soil.
GA3 Increases Germination of briz Mutants
Abscisic acid and gibberellic acid (GA) act antagonistically during germination, so the ability of exogenous GA to affect the briz phenotype of delayed or no germination, or arrested seedling growth was tested. Seeds from heterozygous BRIZ1/briz1-1, BRIZ2/briz2-1, or BRIZ2/briz2-3 plants were plated on GM or GM containing GA3. Homozygous briz seeds were identified after f5 days by their slower germination and the percent of the briz class of seeds that germinated was scored at 1 and 2 weeks (if all briz seeds germinated, the percent is 100%). After 1 week on GM, 0% of homozygous briz1-1 seeds, 3.3% of homozygous briz2-1 seeds, and 0.8% of homozygous briz2-3 seeds had germinated. On GM plates containing 10 μM GA3, these percentages increased to 19.0, 35.5, and 42.0%, respectively (Figures 6A–C). Increasing the concentration of GA3 to 100 μM, 200 μM (Figures 6A–C), or 1 mM (Figure 6D) did not greatly increase germination above that observed for 10 μM GA3.
Figure 6
briz Embryos Are Hypersensitive to Sucrose and Glucose and Elongation Can Be Promoted by GA3
The effects of exogenous hormones on the embryo can be blocked if the seed coat remains intact. Because briz seeds are slow to exhibit SCR, we excised embryos from their seed coats to better assess the effects of exogenous GA3 on embryo growth. To identify homozygous briz seeds for the experiment, which cannot be distinguished at the dry seed stage, seeds from heterozygous BRIZ/briz plants were plated for 48 h on the types of GM plates described in Figure 7, and non-germinated seeds were selected. PCR genotyping after the experiment confirmed that these were briz1-1 or briz2-3 mutants (Supplementary Figure S6). Embryos removed from their seed coats and placed on GM (plain GM contains 1% sucrose) for 5 days remained growth arrested, though an increase in size and anthocyanin was visible (Figure 7A), and the addition of GA3 had no effect (Figure 7B). Glucose had the same effect as sucrose, inhibiting greening and growth (Figures 7G,H). When placed on media without sugar (Figure 7C) or with 1% mannitol as an osmotic control (Figure 7E), cotyledon greening and expansion was visible after 5 days in both briz1-1 and briz2-3 embryos. On both medias, briz hypocotyls elongated with added GA3, while the roots remained short (Figures 7D,F). Wild-type Col embryos greened on all media types and had elongated hypocotyls on medias containing GA3 compared to the same medias without GA3 (Figure 7, bottom row). These results indicate that compared to Col, briz1-1 and briz2-3 single mutants are hypersensitive to the sucrose concentration present typically in GM (1%). A combination of excision from the seed coat and a lack of sucrose in growth media allows briz mutants to develop more than previously observed, and to better respond to GA3. Seed age likely affects briz responsiveness to lack of sucrose, as seeds stored at RT for >6 months showed reduced greening on media without sucrose (Supplementary Figure S7).
Figure 7
ABI5 Levels Are Higher in briz Seeds
ABI5 is a bZIP transcription factor that is important for ABA responses during germination (Lopez-Molina et al., 2002). Given the strong growth arrest and ABA hypersensitivity without increased endogenous ABA in briz mutants, we asked whether ABI5 levels are higher in briz embryos. Seeds from BRIZ1/briz1 or BRIZ2/briz2-3 plants were plated on GM, stratified for 24 h at 4°C, and then incubated at RT for 72 h to identify briz seeds by their non-germination status. Protein extracts from these seeds were compared to protein extracts from wild-type seeds, either dry, stratified, or stratified and then incubated at RT for various timepoints (Figure 8; Supplementary Figure S8). In wild-type seeds, ABI5 levels fell after 24 h of stratification at 4°C, and continued to fall after the seeds were moved to RT. By 72 h, ABI5 levels were greatly reduced. By contrast, ABI5 protein was still visible in briz1-1 and briz2-3 seeds after 72 h at RT. These data indicate a correlation between lack of greening and growth and visible ABI5 protein levels in briz seeds.
Figure 8
In the abi5-7 Background, Both briz1 and briz2 Mutants Have Increased Germination, Greening, and Growth
To test whether ABI5 protein contributes to the growth arrest of briz embryos, we genetically eliminated ABI5. BRIZ1/briz1-1, BRIZ2/briz2-1, and BRIZ2/briz2-3 plants were crossed with abi5-7 plants. The abi5-7 null allele contains a point mutation resulting in an early stop codon, and abi5-7 seeds exhibit reduced sensitivity to ABA (Nambara et al., 2002). F3 seeds from F2 homozygous abi5-7 plants also heterozygous for BRIZ1/briz1-1, BRIZ2/briz2-1, or BRIZ2/briz2-3 were plated on GM. briz1-1, briz2-1, and briz2-3 mutants in the abi5-7 background had increased germination compared to the same alleles in wild-type ABI5 F3 siblings, though they grew more slowly than wild-type seedlings (Figures 9A, 10A). PCR genotyping confirmed that these small, slowly developing, green seedlings were double mutants (Figures 9, 10). We were able to recover two briz1-1 abi5-7 plants. Both grew to maturity on soil but produced few seeds, which failed to germinate (Figures 9D,E; Supplementary Figure S9).
Figure 9
Figure 10
F3 plants homozygous for abi5-7 and heterozygous for BRIZ2/briz2-3 were propagated to produce F4 seeds. Double mutant F4 seedlings with true leaves were transferred from plates to either soil or magenta boxes with GM. A subset survived to flower and produce seeds (Supplementary Figure S10). These plants produced leaves slowly and had small rosettes.
Seeds From briz2-3abi5-7 Plants Are Hypersensitive to Sucrose and Glucose When Compared to Seeds From BRIZ2/briz2-3 abi5-7 Plants
Homozygous briz2-3 abi5-7 plants (Supplementary Figure S10) produced seeds. Interestingly, these seeds were longer and weighed more and their embryos were longer than seeds from wild type (Col) and single mutant abi5-7 plants (Supplementary Figure S11).
When seeds from the briz2-3 abi5-7 plants were plated on GM, germination was slow, as previously observed with briz2-3 abi5-7 seeds derived from heterozygous BRIZ2/briz2-3 abi5-7 plants (see Figure 10), but surprisingly, after 10 days, the germinated seedlings did not have green cotyledons on GM (with 1% sucrose; Figure 11A). To directly test whether the sucrose present in GM inhibits germination and growth of seeds from double mutant briz2-3 abi5-7 plants as observed previously with briz single mutant embryos, seeds were also plated on GM without sugar, GM with 1% mannitol instead as an osmotic control, or with 1% glucose instead of sucrose (Figure 11). Seeds from Col, abi5-7, and BRIZ2/briz2-3 plants were plated as controls. After 10 days, only 21.7% of briz2-3 abi5-7 seeds had germinated on GM containing sucrose, significantly lower than 88.3, 78.3, and 66.7% on GM lacking sugar, containing mannitol, or containing glucose, respectively (Figure 11D, left graphs). Some seeds from briz2-3 abi5-7 plants that germinated on GM (+1% sucrose) had green cotyledons initially (Supplementary Figure S12A), but they did not expand fully, the green faded after several days, and by 10 days the seedlings were noticeably purple (Figure 11C, leftmost image and Supplementary Figure S12B).
Figure 11
In addition to inhibited germination on GM containing sucrose or glucose, briz2-3 abi5-7 mutants had inhibited cotyledon greening and expansion (Figure 11). Ten days after plating, none of the briz2-3 abi5-7 seedlings on GM plates containing sucrose or glucose had expanded green cotyledons, a significant difference compared to ~70% of the germinated seedlings on GM lacking sugar or on GM containing 1% mannitol in place of sucrose (58.3% of total seeds plated for both; Figure 11D, right graphs). We also noticed that seedlings grown on GM without sucrose from briz2-3 abi5-7 plants, while green at 10 days, then yellowed/senesced earlier than seedlings from Col or abi5-7 plants when maintained on the same plates for 2.5 weeks (Supplementary Figure S13). To summarize these results, sucrose inhibited germination of briz2-3 abi57 mutants, while both sucrose and glucose inhibited cotyledon expansion and greening.
Discussion
The two Arabidopsis BRIZ genes, BRIZ1 and BRIZ2, were originally identified in a reverse genetic screen for phenotypic effects resulting from T-DNA insertion in genes encoding RING-type E3 ligases (Hsia and Callis, 2010). Although BRIZ1 and 2 share the same domains, single loss-of-functions mutants in either briz1 or briz2 have similar phenotypes, indicating that they are not functionally redundant. BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 interact in vitro and when over-expressed in planta, and expression of truncated BRIZ proteins unable to form heteromers fail to complement the briz mutant phenotypes, leading us to propose that the two proteins normally function in a complex as a single E3 ligase activity (Hsia and Callis, 2010). However, the biological functions of the BRIZ heteromer remained unknown.
We show here multiple lines of evidence to support the hypothesis that briz1 and 2 embryos are hypersensitive to ABA. First, their macroscopic phenotypes resemble ABA-arrested seedlings: defective in germination, greening, true leaf formation and cotyledon expansion, while maintaining cell viability. briz1 and briz2 seeds are also defective in SCR, an ABA-modulated process. Although SCR was traditionally thought to be ABA-independent because SCR occurs on ABA-containing media that blocks subsequent radicle emergence, current evidence indicates that exogenous ABA does not penetrate through the seed coat or through the layer of cuticle outside the single cell layer of endosperm, which blocks ABA exposure to the embryo (De Giorgi et al., 2015). In nicking experiments, which expose embryos to the media, exogenous ABA is effective in blocking SCR in wild-type seeds (Barros-Galvão et al., 2019). In contrast, SCR in nicked abi5-7 seeds is almost completely insensitive to exogenous ABA, indicating a key role for ABI5 in this process (Barros-Galvão et al., 2019). Next, the carotenoid biosynthesis inhibitor fluridone, which reduces endogenous ABA levels, partially relieved the growth arrest of briz embryos. This effect was reversed on media containing fluridone plus 0.1 μM ABA, a concentration that does not inhibit germination of wild-type seeds. The partial rescue of briz2 growth in a genetic background of reduced ABA content and the partial rescue of both briz loci in the abi5-7 mutant background additionally supports this model. Exogenous GA3, which functions antagonistically to ABA, promoted germination and cotyledon greening of briz mutants. Altogether, these results support the hypothesis that briz mutants are hypersensitive to ABA and that BRIZ plays a role in ABA signaling under non-stress conditions most predominantly during germination and early seedling growth.
Although briz1 and briz2 single mutants have the similar phenotypic differences from wild type, briz1 mutants were not phenotypically rescued to the same extent as briz2 mutants in either the abi5-7 or gin1-3 backgrounds. For example, while we were able to obtain mature briz2-2 gin1-3 double mutant plants, we could not obtain mature briz1-1 gin1-3 double mutants, likely as a result of increased double mutant seed loss observed in siliques of BRIZ1/briz1-1 gin1-3 plants. These results suggest that the in vivo functions of BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 are not completely redundant. We previously observed that their in vitro biochemical activities were not equivalent (Hsia and Callis, 2010), and these differences could result in loss of BRIZ1 having in a more severe effect in vivo, although we do not understand the mechanism.
The phenotype of briz mutants in the abi5-7 background supports a model in which BRIZ is important during germination but is less important for later vegetative growth. Our hypothesis is that BRIZ acts as a brake on ABA signaling, and loss of BRIZ leads to ABA hypersensitivity in briz seeds. Loss of ABI5, which promotes inhibition of germination by ABA (Finkelstein and Lynch, 2000), partially compensates for the hypersensitivity to ABA in briz abi5-7 double mutants and allows many seeds to germinate. However, their remaining ABA hypersensitivity is still strong enough to delay germination for an extended period of time. Once past germination and seedling establishment, the ability of briz2-3 abi5-7 double mutants to grow to maturity with some seed set suggests that loss of BRIZ2 does not play a major role during later vegetative and reproductive growth. Whether BRIZ2 affects ABI5 accumulation, localization, and/or phosphorylation is challenging to assess. 72-h-old non-germinated briz seeds do have detectable ABI5 protein, but whether this results from the arrested germinated state or is causal in arresting growth is not certain.
How exactly might BRIZ function in ABA signaling? The roles of BRIZ orthologs could provide clues. Human BRAP2/IMP (BRCA1-associated protein 2, also called IMP for Impedes mitogenic signal propagation) is an E3 ligase with the same BRAP2, RING, ZnF UBP, and coiled-coil domains as Arabidopsis BRIZ1 and BRIZ2. BRAP2/IMP acts as a cytoplasmic retention factor for multiple proteins (Li et al., 1998; Asada et al., 2004; Davies et al., 2013) and reduces Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling (Matheny et al., 2004). In Ras signaling, IMP sequesters the scaffold protein KSR1 and prevents KSR1 homo-oligomerization. In the presence of growth factor, IMP self-ubiquitinates and targets itself for proteasomal degradation. KSR1 is then free to homo-oligomerize and act as a scaffold for the kinase Raf and its substrate MEK. Like IMP, BRIZ could function as an adaptor protein between ABA signaling components.
Raf-like kinases and a MAPK scaffold protein have been identified in plants. There are 48 Raf-like kinases in Arabidopsis (Jonak et al., 2002), including CTR1 (also called SIS1 for SUGAR-INSENSITIVE1). Though mostly known for its role in ethylene signaling, CTR1 also plays a role in sensitivity to both ABA (Ghassemian et al., 2000) and sugar (Zhou et al., 1998; Gibson et al., 2001). RAF10 and RAF11 are Arabidopsis Raf-like kinases that promote seed dormancy and ABA response (Lee et al., 2015). It was recently reported that multiple other Raf-like kinases are also involved in ABA signaling (Lin et al., 2020). RECEPTOR FOR ACTIVATED C PROTEIN KINASE 1 A (RACK1A) is an Arabidopsis MAPK scaffold protein (Guo et al., 2007; Cheng et al., 2015). Arabidopsis RACK1 proteins are encoded by three genes (RACK1A, B, and C; Chen et al., 2006). rack1a mutants are hypersensitive to ABA (Chen et al., 2006), and the increased ABA hypersensitivity of rack1a rack1b and rack1a rack1c double mutants suggests that the RACK1 genes function redundantly to reduce ABA response (Guo et al., 2009). Whether BRIZ proteins have any relationship with Raf-like kinases or MAPK scaffold proteins is unknown. One hypothesis is that BRIZ might modulate the abundance or activity of a Raf-like kinase or a scaffold protein in an ABA-dependent manner.
We found that briz1 and briz2 embryos are hypersensitive to exogenous sucrose and glucose, which is not an osmotic effect. A number of ABA signaling mutants have altered sensitivities to sugar. For example, mutants that are insensitive to glucose include the PP2C phosphatase mutant abi2-1 (Dekkers et al., 2008) and the transcription factor mutants abi3-1 (Yuan and Wysocka-Diller, 2006; Dekkers et al., 2008), abi4 (Arenas-Huertero et al., 2000), abi5 (Arenas-Huertero et al., 2000), and abf2 (Kim et al., 2004). Overexpression of ABI3, ABI4, or ABI5 results in glucose hypersensitivity (Finkelstein et al., 2002). Sugar-related phenotypes are evident in alternative names for many ABA-related genes. ABA2 is also called GIN1 for GLUCOSE INSENSITIVE 1, ISI4 for IMPAIRED SUCROSE INDUCTION 4, and SIS4 for SUGAR INSENSITIVE 4. ABI3 is also called SIS10 for SUGAR INSENSITIVE 10. ABI4 is also called GIN6 for GLUCOSE INSENSITIVE 6 and has several other sucrose-based names including SIS5 for SUGAR INSENSITIVE 5. With mutant phenotypes related to both to both ABA and sugar, BRIZ joins the collection of genes involved in both signaling pathways.
While abi5-1 mutants are somewhat resistant to high levels of glucose (Arenas-Huertero et al., 2000), briz abi5-7 double mutants retain sensitivity to glucose and sucrose. This indicates that briz sugar sensitivity occurs independent of ABI5. Curiously, abi5-7 briz2-3 double mutants derived from homozygous abi5-7 briz2-3 parents are more sensitive to sucrose than double mutants derived from heterozygous BRIZ2/briz2-3 parents, and seeds from abi5-7 briz2-3 plants are larger than seeds from abi5-7 BRIZ2/briz2-3 plants. It is possible that in ABA-hypersensitive briz2-3 abi5-7 plants, the transport of sugars or other nutrients to the developing embryo or seed is affected. The pigmentation visible in briz mutants plated on sucrose or glucose resembles descriptions of anthocyanins produced in response to high levels of exogenous sugar (Dekkers et al., 2008). The behavior of seeds from briz2-3 abi5-7 mutants, which are hypersensitive to the 1% sucrose in agar GM plates compared to briz2-3 abi5-7 mutants derived from BRIZ2/briz2-3 abi5-7 plants, suggests that the parental BRIZ2 genotype affects sugar sensitivity.
The reasons for heterogeneity in briz germination phenotypes, and for the partial rescue of some but not all briz seeds with reductions in ABA synthesis, ABA signaling or with the addition of GA3, are unknown. These variable responses could reflect a phenomenon called bet-hedging, where differences in germination behavior are observed even when genetically identical seeds are grown under the same environmental conditions. These differences can act as a mechanism to ensure species survival under possible variable, stressful conditions (Bradford, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2017; Cortijo and Locke, 2020). GA and ABA can act as a bistable switch to control germination, and this switch can amplify variability in germination (Abley et al., 2020). Perhaps briz individuals with altered ABA responses have amplified differences in ABA-GA antagonism during germination, with individuals “flipping” either one way or the other.
Gibberellic acid opposes most ABA responses by repressing ABA synthesis and ABA signaling, and the ratio of GA:ABA regulates the developmental outcome (Liu and Hou, 2018; Shu et al., 2018; Vishal and Kumar, 2018). The initial GA signaling event is GA-induced degradation/inactivation of the DELLA family of proteins. DELLAs suppress germination, in part by repressing expansin gene expression to prevent endosperm cell wall weakening and expansion (Sánchez-Montesino et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2020), and promote anthocyanin biosynthesis by sequestering the negative regulators JAZ and MYBL2, freeing other TFs to promote transcription of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes (Xie et al., 2016). Although it remains possible that defective GA signaling could contribute to the observed ABA hypersensitivity, possibly in an organ-specific and/or developmentally specific manner, we observed that briz seed germination is enhanced and seedling hypocotyls elongate in response to exogenous GA. Therefore, we are framing further experiments to test the hypothesis that the BRIZ ubiquitin E3 ligase plays a role in the ABA and sugar response network.
In summary, BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 are two RING-type E3 ligases involved in ABA signaling or response, either directly or indirectly. BRIZ is important for germination and early seedling growth, and further analysis of BRIZ function will provide insight into ABA’s role in regulating this critical developmental transition in the plant life cycle.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
KL, MH, and JC designed the research and wrote the paper. KL, MH, Y-TC, and JC performed research and analyzed data. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation; MCB-0929100 to JC (co-PI, R.D. Vierstra, PI) and IOS-1557760 (JC, PI) and funds from the Paul K. and Ruth R. Stumpf Endowed Professorship in Plant Biochemistry and the UC Davis Alumni Award Foundation for Teaching and Scholarly Work to JC. We acknowledge support from Hatch CA-D*-MCB-5554-H.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Laurens Pawels and Alain Goossens (VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium) and John Riggs, Brandan Schultz, Jonathan Gilkerson, Damian Guerra, Sara Hotton, and other past and present members of the Callis lab, for many helpful suggestions and discussions. We thank UC Davis undergraduates Elaine Zhang, Stephanie Ng, Daisy Carrillo, Osman Nusmair, Matthew Wright, Alisha Sousa, Christine Knox, technicians Brandan Schultz, Khin Kyaw, and Sonia Chapiro, and summer intern Imani Bunn. We thank Eli Nambara and Ruth Finkelstein for the gift of abi5-7 seeds, Dr. Finkelstein for assistance with genotyping the abi5-7 allele and helpful discussions, and Max Gasser for PCR genotyping assistance. We also thank R. Vierstra (Washington University, STL) for gift of anti-ABI5 antibody, Charles Gasser for assistance with analysis of briz gin segregation, and the University of California-Davis Controlled Environment Facility (CEF) for assistance with the propagation of transgenic plants.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.641849/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AbleyK.Formosa-JordanP.TavaresH.ChanE.LeyserO.LockeJ. C. W. (2020). An ABA-GA bistable switch can account for natural variation in the variability of Arabidopsis seed germination time. bioRxiv [Preprint]. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.05.135681
2
Arenas-HuerteroF.ArroyoA.ZhouL.SheenJ.LeonP. (2000). Analysis of Arabidopsis glucose insensitive mutants, gin5 and gin6, reveals a central role of the plant hormone ABA in the regulation of plant vegetative development by sugar. Genes Dev.14, 2085–2096. PMID:
3
AsadaM.OhmiK.DeliaD.EnosawaS.SuzukiS.YuoA.et al. (2004). BRAP2 functions as a cytoplasmic retention protein for p21 during monocyte differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol.24, 8236–8243. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.18.8236-8243.2004
4
BarreroJ. M.MillarA. A.GriffithsJ.CzechowskiT.ScheibleW. R.UdvardiM.et al. (2010). Gene expression profiling identifies two regulatory genes controlling dormancy and ABA sensitivity in Arabidopsis seeds. Plant J.61, 611–622. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04088.x
5
Barros-GalvãoT.VaistijF. E.GrahamI. A. (2019). Control of seed coat rupture by ABA-INSENSITIVE 5 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Seed Sci. Res.29, 143–148. doi: 10.1017/S0960258519000059
6
BartelsP.WatsonC. (1978). Inhibition of carotenoid synthesis by fluridone and norflurazon. Weed Sci.26, 198–203. doi: 10.1017/S0043174500049675
7
BradfordK. J. (2002). Applications of hydrothermal time to quantifying and modeling seed germination and dormancy. Weed Sci.50, 248–260. doi: 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0248:AOHTTQ]2.0.CO;2
8
BuQ. Y.LiH. M.ZhaoQ. Z.JiangH. L.ZhaiQ. Z.ZhangJ.et al. (2009). The Arabidopsis RING finger E3 ligase RHA2a is a novel positive regulator of abscisic acid signaling during seed germination and early seedling development. Plant Physiol.150, 463–481. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.135269
9
BuesoE.RodriguezL.Lorenzo-OrtsL.Gonzalez-GuzmanM.SayasE.Munoz-BertomeuJ.et al. (2014). The single-subunit RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase RSL1 targets PYL4 and PYR1 ABA receptors in plasma membrane to modulate abscisic acid signaling. Plant J.80, 1057–1071. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12708
10
CaiZ. Y.LiuJ. J.WangH. J.YangC. J.ChenY. X.LiY. C.et al. (2014). GSK3-like kinases positively modulate abscisic acid signaling through phosphorylating subgroup III SnRK2s in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.111, 9651–9656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316717111
11
ChenY. -T.LiuH.StoneS.CallisJ. (2013). ABA and the ubiquitin E3 ligase KEEP ON GOING affect proteolysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors ABF1 and ABF3. Plant J.75, 965–976. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12259
12
ChenJ. -G.UllahH.TempleB.LiangJ.GuoJ.AlonsoJ. M.et al. (2006). RACK1 mediates multiple hormone responsiveness and developmental processes in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot.57, 2697–2708. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl035
13
ChenQ.ZhangB.HicksL. M.WangS.JezJ. M. (2009). A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based assay for indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase. Anal. Biochem.390, 149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.04.027
14
ChengW. H.EndoA.ZhouL.PenneyJ.ChenH. C.ArroyoA.et al. (2002). A unique short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase in Arabidopsis glucose signaling and abscisic acid biosynthesis and functions. Plant Cell14, 2723–2743. doi: 10.1105/tpc.006494
15
ChengZ.LiJ. -F.NiuY.ZhangX. -C.WoodyO. Z.XiongY.et al. (2015). Pathogen-secreted proteases activate a novel plant immune pathway. Nature521, 213–216. doi: 10.1038/nature14243
16
ChengC.WangZ.RenZ.ZhiL.YaoB.SuC.et al. (2017). SCFAtPP2-B11 modulates ABA signaling by facilitating SnRK2.3 degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet.13:e1006947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006947
17
CortijoS.LockeJ. C. W. (2020). Does gene expression noise play a functional role in plants?Trends Plant Sci.25, 1041–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.04.017
18
CutlerS. R.RodriguezP. L.FinkelsteinR. R.AbramsS. R. (2010). Abscisic acid: emergence of a core signaling network. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.61, 651–679. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112122
19
DaviesR. G.WagstaffK. M.McLaughlinE. A.LovelandK. L.JansD. A. (2013). The BRCA1-binding protein BRAP2 can act as a cytoplasmic retention factor for nuclear and nuclear envelope-localizing testicular proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1833, 3436–3444. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.05.015
20
De GiorgiJ.PiskurewiczU.LouberyS.Utz-PuginA.BaillyC.Mène-SaffranéL.et al. (2015). An endosperm-associated cuticle is required for Arabidopsis seed viability, dormancy and early control of germination. PLoS Genet.11:e1005708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005708
21
DekkersB. J. W.SchuurmansJ. A. M. J.SmeekensS. C. M. (2008). Interaction between sugar and abscisic acid signalling during early seedling development in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol.67, 151–167. doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9308-6
22
FinkelsteinR. R. (1994). Mutations at two new Arabidopsis ABA response loci are similar to the abi3 mutations. Plant J.5, 765–771. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1994.5060765.x
23
FinkelsteinR. (2013). “Abscisic acid synthesis and response” in The Arabidopsis Book. ed. ToriK. (Washington, DC: The American Society of Plant Biologists), e0166.
24
FinkelsteinR. R.GampalaS. S.RockC. D. (2002). Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell14, S15–S45. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010441
25
FinkelsteinR. R.LynchT. J. (2000). The Arabidopsis abscisic acid response gene ABI5 encodes a basic leucine zipper transcription factor. Plant Cell12, 599–609. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.4.599
26
GhassemianM.NambaraE.CutlerS.KawaideH.KamiyaY.McCourtP. (2000). Regulation of abscisic acid signaling by the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell12, 1117–1126. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.7.1117
27
GibbsD. J.Md IsaN.MovahediM.Lozano-JusteJ.MendiondoG. M.BerckhanS.et al. (2014). Nitric oxide sensing in plants is mediated by proteolytic control of group VII ERF transcription factors. Mol. Cell53, 369–379. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.12.020
28
GibsonS. I.LabyR. J.KimD. (2001). The sugar-insensitive1 (sis1) mutant of Arabidopsis is allelic to ctr1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.280, 196–203. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4062
29
González-GuzmánM.ApostolovaN.BellésJ. M.BarreroJ. M.PiquerasP.PonceM. R.et al. (2002). The short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase ABA2 catalyzes the conversion of xanthoxin to abscisic aldehyde. Plant Cell14, 1833–1846. doi: 10.1105/tpc.002477
30
GuY.InnesR. W. (2012). The KEEP ON GOING protein of Arabidopsis regulates intracellular protein trafficking and is degraded during fungal infection. Plant Cell24, 4717–4730. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.105254
31
GuoJ.LiangJ.ChenJ. -G. (2007). RACK1, a versatile scaffolding protein in plants?Int. J. Plant Dev. Biol.1, 95–105.
32
GuoJ.WangJ.XiL.HuangW. -D.LiangJ.ChenJ. -G. (2009). RACK1 is a negative regulator of ABA responses in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot.60, 3819–3833. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp221
33
HoldsworthM. J.BentsinkL.SoppeW. J. J. (2008). Molecular networks regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after-ripening, dormancy and germination. New Phytol.179, 33–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02437.x
34
HsiaM. M.CallisJ. (2010). BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 proteins form a heteromeric E3 ligase complex required for seed germination and post-germination growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem.285, 37070–37081. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.168021
35
IrigoyenM. L.IniestoE.RodriguezL.PugaM. I.YanagawaY.PickE.et al. (2014). Targeted degradation of abscisic acid receptors is mediated by the ubiquitin ligase substrate adaptor DDA1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell26, 712–728. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.122234
36
JonakC.OkreszL.BogreL.HirtH. (2002). Complexity, cross talk and integration of plant MAP kinase signalling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.5, 415–424. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00285-6
37
JurkiewiczP.BatokoH. (2018). Protein degradation mechanisms modulate abscisic acid signaling and responses during abiotic stress. Plant Sci.267, 48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.10.017
38
KelleyD. R. (2018). E3 ubiquitin ligases: key regulators of hormone signaling in plants. Mol. Cell. Proteomics17, 1047–1054. doi: 10.1074/mcp.MR117.000476
39
KimS.KangJ. Y.ChoD. I.ParkJ. H.KimS. Y. (2004). ABF2, an ABRE-binding bZIP factor, is an essential component of glucose signaling and its overexpression affects multiple stress tolerance. Plant J.40, 75–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02192.x
40
KimJ.KimW. (2013). The Arabidopsis RING E3 ubiquitin ligase AtAIRP3/LOG2 participates in positive regulation of high-salt and drought stress responses. Plant Physiol.162, 1733–1749. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.220103
41
KimS. J.RyuM. Y.KimW. T. (2012). Suppression of Arabidopsis RING-DUF1117 E3 ubiquitin ligases, AtRDUF1 and AtRDUF2, reduces tolerance to ABA-mediated drought stress. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.420, 141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.02.131
42
KongL.ChengJ.ZhuY.DingY.MengJ.ChenZ.et al. (2015). Degradation of the ABA co-receptor ABI1 by PUB12/13 U-box E3 ligases. Nat. Commun.6:8630. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9630
43
LaiC. P.LeeC. L.ChenP. H.WuS. H.YangC. C.ShawJ. F. (2004). Molecular analyses of the Arabidopsis TUBBY-like protein gene family. Plant Physiol.134, 1586–1597. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.037820
44
LeeS. J.LeeM. H.KimJ. I.KimS. Y. (2015). Arabidopsis putative MAP kinase kinase kinases Raf10 and Raf11 are positive regulators of seed dormancy and ABA response. Plant Cell Physiol.56, 84–97. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu148
45
LeeK. P.Lopez-MolinaL. (2013). A seed coat bedding assay to genetically explore in vitro how the endosperm controls seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Vis. Exp.9:e50732. doi: 10.3791/50732
46
LeeK. P.PiskurewiczU.TureckovaV.StrnadM.Lopez-MolinaL. (2010b). A seed coat bedding assay shows that RGL2-dependent release of abscisic acid by the endosperm controls embryo growth in Arabidopsis dormant seeds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.107, 19108–19113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012896107
47
LeeJ.YoonH.TerzaghiW.MartinezC.DaiM.LiJ.et al. (2010a). DWA1 and DWA2, two Arabidopsis DWD protein components of CUL4-based E3 ligases, act together as negative regulators in ABA signal transduction. Plant Cell22, 1716–1732. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.073783
48
LeungJ.Bouvier-DurandM.MorrisP. C.GuerrierD.ChefdorF.GiraudatJ. (1994). Arabidopsis ABA response gene ABI1: features of a calcium-modulated protein phosphatase. Science264, 1448–1452. doi: 10.1126/science.7910981
49
LiS.KuC. Y.FarmerA. A.CongY. S.ChenC. F.LeeW. H. (1998). Identification of a novel cytoplasmic protein that specifically binds to nuclear localization signal motifs. J. Biol. Chem.273, 6183–6189. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.11.6183
50
LinZ.LiY.ZhangZ.LiuX.HsuC. -C.DuY.et al. (2020). A RAF-SnRK2 kinase cascade mediates early osmotic stress signaling in higher plants. Nat. Commun.11, 613–613. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14477-9
51
LiuX.HouX. (2018). Antagonistic regulation of ABA and GA in metabolism and signaling pathways. Front. Plant Sci.9:251. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00251
52
LiuH. X.StoneS. L. (2010). Abscisic acid increases Arabidopsis ABI5 transcription factor levels by promoting KEG E3 ligase self-ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Plant Cell22, 2630–2641. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.076075
53
LiuH.StoneS. L. (2011). E3 ubiquitin ligases and abscisic acid signaling. Plant Signal. Behav.6, 344–348. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.3.13914
54
Lopez-MolinaL.MongrandS.ChuaN. H. (2001). A post germination developmental arrest checkpoint is mediated by abscisic acid and requires the ABI5 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.98, 4782–4787. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081594298
55
Lopez-MolinaL.MongrandS.McLachlinD. T.ChaitB. T.ChuaN. H. (2002). ABI5 acts downstream of ABI3 to execute an ABA-dependent growth arrest during germination. Plant J.32, 317–328. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01430.x
56
MathenyS. A.ChenC.KortumR. L.RazidloG. L.LewisR. E.WhiteM. A. (2004). Ras regulates assembly of mitogenic signalling complexes through the effector protein IMP. Nature427, 256–260. doi: 10.1038/nature02237
57
MiricescuA.GoslinK.GracietE. (2018). Ubiquitylation in plants: signaling hub for the integration of environmental signals. J. Exp. Bot.69, 4511–4527. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery165
58
MitchellJ.JohnstonI. G.BasselG. W. (2017). Variability in seeds: biological, ecological, and agricultural implications. J. Exp. Bot.68, 809–817. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw397
59
MunemasaS.HauserF.ParkJ.WaadtR.BrandtB.SchroederJ. I. (2015). Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated control of stomatal aperture. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.28, 154–162. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.10.010
60
NakashimaK.FujitaY.KatsuraK.MaruyamaK.NarusakaY.SekiM.et al. (2006). Transcriptional regulation of ABI3-and ABA-responsive genes including RD29B and RD29A in seeds, germinating embryos, and seedlings of Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol.60, 51–68. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-2418-5
61
NambaraE.SuzukiM.AbramsS.McCartyD. R.KamiyaY.McCourtP. (2002). A screen for genes that function in abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics161, 1247–1255. PMID:
62
NguyenQ. T. C.LeeS. J.ChoiS. W.NaY. J.SongM. R.HoangQ. T. N.et al. (2019). Arabidopsis Raf-like kinase Raf10 is a regulatory component of core ABA signaling. Mol. Cell42, 646–660. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2019.0173
63
OhE.AkopianD.RapeM. (2018). Principles of ubiquitin-dependent signaling. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.34, 137–162. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-062802
64
PiskurewiczU.JikumaruY.KinoshitaN.NambaraE.KamiyaY.Lopez-MolinaL. (2008). The gibberellic acid signaling repressor RGL2 inhibits Arabidopsis seed germination by stimulating abscisic acid synthesis and ABI5 activity. Plant Cell20, 2729–2745. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.061515
65
SadanandomA.BaileyM.EwanR.LeeJ.NelisS. (2012). The ubiquitin-proteasome system: central modifier of plant signalling. New Phytol.196, 13–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04266.x
66
Sánchez-MontesinoR.Bouza-MorcilloL.MarquezJ.GhitaM.Duran-NebredaS.GómezL.et al. (2019). A regulatory module controlling GA-mediated endosperm cell expansion is critical for seed germination in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant12, 71–85. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.10.009
67
SeoK. I.LeeJ. H.NezamesC. D.ZhongS.SongE.ByunM. O.et al. (2014). ABD1 is an Arabidopsis DCAF substrate receptor for CUL4-DDB1-based E3 ligases that acts as a negative regulator of abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell26, 695–711. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.119974
68
ShuK.ZhouW.ChenF.LuoX.YangW. (2018). Abscisic acid and gibberellins antagonistically mediate plant development and abiotic stress responses. Front. Plant Sci.9:416. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00416
69
SkubaczA.Daszkowska-GolecA.SzarejkoI. (2016). The role and regulation of ABI5 (ABA-insensitive 5) in plant development, abiotic stress responses and phytohormone crosstalk. Front. Plant Sci.7:1884. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01884
70
StoneS. L.WilliamsL. A.FarmerL. M.VIerstraR. D.CallisJ. (2006). KEEP ON GOING, a RING E3 ligase essential for Arabidopsis growth and development, is involved in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell18, 3415–3428. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.046532
71
TruernitE.HaseloffJ. (2008). A simple way to identify non-viable cells within living plant tissue using confocal microscopy. Plant Methods4:15. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-4-15
72
VierstraR. (2011). The ubiquitin-26S proteasome system at the nexus of plant biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.10, 38–397. doi: 10.1038/nrm2688
73
VishalB.KumarP. P. (2018). Regulation of seed germination and abiotic stresses by gibberellins and abscisic acid. Front. Plant Sci.9:838. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00838
74
WuQ.ZhangX.Peirats-LlobetM.Belda-PalazonB.WangX.CuiS.et al. (2016). Ubiquitin ligases RGLG1 and RGLG5 regulate abscisic acid signaling by controlling the turnover of phosphatase PP2CA. Plant Cell28, 2178–2196. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00364
75
XieY.TanH.MaZ.HuangJ. (2016). DELLA proteins promote anthocyanin biosynthesis via sequestering MYBL2 and JAZ suppressors of the MYB/bHLH/WD40 complex in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant9, 711–721. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.01.014
76
XuH.LantzouniO.BrugginkT.BenjaminsR.LanfermeijerF.DenbyK.et al. (2020). A molecular signal integration network underpinning Arabidopsis seed germination. Curr. Biol.30, 3703.e4–3712.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.012
77
YoshidaT.ChristmannA.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK.GrillE.FernieA. R. (2019). Revisiting the basal role of ABA–roles outside of stress. Trends Plant Sci.24, 625–635. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.04.008
78
YuF.WuY.XieQ. (2016). Ubiquitin–proteasome system in ABA signaling: from perception to action. Mol. Plant9, 21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.09.015
79
YuanK.Wysocka-DillerJ. (2006). Phytohormone signalling pathways interact with sugars during seed germination and seedling development. J. Exp. Bot.57, 3359–3367. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl096
80
ZhangX.GarretonV.ChuaH. -H. (2005). The AIP2 E3 ligase acts as a novel negative regulator of ABA signaling by promoting ABI3 degradation. Genes Dev.19, 1535–1543. doi: 10.1101/gad.1318705
81
ZhangJ.HafeezM. T.DiD.WuL.ZhangL. (2019). Precise control of ABA signaling through post-translational protein modification. Plant Growth Regul.88, 99–111. doi: 10.1007/s10725-019-00492-4
82
ZhengY.ChenZ.MaL.LiaoC. (2018). The ubiquitin E3 ligase RHA2b promotes degradation of MYB30 in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Physiol.178, 428–440. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00683
83
ZhouL.JangJ. C.JonesT. L.SheenJ. (1998). Glucose and ethylene signal transduction crosstalk revealed by an Arabidopsis glucose-insensitive mutant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.95, 10294–10299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.17.10294
Summary
Keywords
Arabidopsis, E3 ligase, abscisic acid, ubiquitin, hormone signaling, germination, ABI5, ABA2
Citation
Linden KJ, Hsia MM, Chen Y-T and Callis J (2021) The Arabidopsis thaliana E3 Ubiquitin Ligase BRIZ Functions in Abscisic Acid Response. Front. Plant Sci. 12:641849. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.641849
Received
15 December 2020
Accepted
10 February 2021
Published
16 March 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Derek Gingerich, University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire, United States
Reviewed by
Qi Xie, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Eiji Nambara, University of Toronto, Canada
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Linden, Hsia, Chen and Callis.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Judy Callis, jcallis@ucdavis.edu
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Plant Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.