<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.908659</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Realization of Lodging Tolerance in the Aromatic Grass, <italic>Cymbopogon khasianus</italic> Through Ploidy Intervention</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Vimala</surname> <given-names>Yerramilli</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Lavania</surname> <given-names>Umesh Chandra</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/498581/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>Madhavi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lavania</surname> <given-names>Seshu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>Sarita</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Basu</surname> <given-names>Surochita</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Botany, Chaudhary Charan Singh (CCS) University</institution>, <addr-line>Meerut</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Botany, University of Lucknow</institution>, <addr-line>Lucknow</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Botany, Chowdhary Mahadev Prasad (CMP) College (Constituent College of Central University of Allahabad)</institution>, <addr-line>Prayagraj</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Department of Botany, Tripura University (A Central University)</institution>, <addr-line>Agartala</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Jen-Tsung Chen, National University of Kaohsiung, Taiwan</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Muhammad Ajmal Bashir, University of Tuscia, Italy; Yavar Vafaee, University of Kurdistan, Iran</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Umesh Chandra Lavania, <email>lavaniauc@yahoo.co.in</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Breeding, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>09</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>908659</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>30</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>20</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2022 Vimala, Lavania, Singh, Lavania, Srivastava and Basu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Vimala, Lavania, Singh, Lavania, Srivastava and Basu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Artificial polyploidy that brings about increase in cell size confers changes in histo-morphology leading to altered phenotype, causing changes in physiological attributes and enhanced concentration of secondary metabolites. The altered phenotype is generally a manifestation of tissue hardiness reflected as robust plant type. Based on a case study undertaken on an industrially important grass, <italic>Cymbopogon khasianus</italic> (2<italic>n</italic> = 60) valued for its citral rich essential oil, here we report that the artificial polyploidy not only brings about enhancement in concentration of essential oil but also facilitates lodging tolerance. The latter is contributed by ploidy mediated changes that occur to the cells and tissues in various plant organs by way of increased wall thickening, tissue enhancement and epidermal depositions that enable robust features. An exhaustive illustrated account covering various micro-/macro-morphological, skeletal and histochemical features constituting growth and development vis-a-vis ploidy mediated changes is presented highlighting the novelties realized on account of induced polyploidy.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>polyploidy and lodging tolerance</kwd>
<kwd>ploidy mediated histological changes</kwd>
<kwd>polyploidy and secondary metabolites</kwd>
<kwd>polyploidy breeding</kwd>
<kwd>aromatic grass</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="45"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="6180"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>It is an established fact that multiple cyclic episodes of whole-genome doubling or polyploidization have led to evolution and speciation in flowering plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Wendel, 2015</xref>). The wondrous cycles of genome doubling are thought to be correlated with periods of extinction or global climate change over the geological time scale, while polyploids often thrive in harsh or disturbed environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Van de Peer et al., 2021</xref>), and could colonize new habitats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Moraes et al., 2022</xref>). There are contrasting viewpoints about polyploidy as an evolutionary force, spanning from &#x201C;evolutionary dead end&#x201D; to &#x201C;major player in evolution&#x201D; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lavania, 2020</xref>), but an established ecological force (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Van de Peer et al., 2021</xref>). Initial models of polyploid evolution based on studies spanned over 70 years, considered autopolyploidy as an evolutionary dead end (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Stebbins, 1999</xref>), but subsequent studies led to believe that polyploidy <italic>per se</italic> both auto- and allo- are the source for evolutionary innovation and species diversification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Van de Peer et al., 2021</xref>). Evidence accumulated on ecological niche vis-a-vis polyploid establishment underpin that polyploids evince broader adaptability and vast ecological tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">teBeest et al., 2012</xref>) and owe higher invasive potential compared to their diploid relatives (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Pandit et al., 2011</xref>), although the distribution of such polyploid lineages may have restricted range distribution in preferred environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Villa et al., 2022</xref>). It is also surmised that there is differential response to both biotic interactions and abiotic stress on polyploids vs. non-polyploids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Van de Peer et al., 2021</xref>). Polyploid organisms are thought to be more resilient to extreme environments owing to increased genetic variation, bufferring effect and adaptive potential of duplicated genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Van de Peer et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Doyle and Coate, 2019</xref>). As such, stress response in general is an important factor in the establishment of polyploidy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Van de Peer et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Identification of several critical genome replication/duplication events during the periods of major environmental and climate change (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Alix et al., 2017</xref>), have led to propose that environmental constraints could elicit polyploidization/genome duplication as an escape to overcome the vagaries of harsh environment as adaptive speciation and survival strategy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Levin, 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>While discussing the likely patterns of speciation in next 500 years, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Levin (2019)</xref> opines that if the global climate undergoes major changes, then this will lead to an increase in the number of plant chromosomes, and thereby an increase in the current proportion of polyploids in angiosperms to 35&#x2013;50%, and an overall proportion up to 50% of the Earth&#x2019;s plant species as polyploids. He further argues that such polyploidy incidences would be more pronounced in short-statured herbaceous plants. This is consistent with our earlier observations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Lavania and Srivastava, 1988</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">1990</xref>), where it is observed that the subcultures of the diploid vs. autoteraploid calli when grown over a passage of monthly subcultures under stressful environment <italic>in vitro</italic>, exhibit differential effect to polyploidization, whereby the diploids turn into polyploids but the tetraploids retain the original ploidy status.</p>
<p>The polyploidy/genome doubling is considered a natural consequence to overcome abiotic stress. It is known to bring about changes in transpiration, water use efficiency, photosynthetic rate, phenology, antioxidant response, and morphology etc. that confer success to polyploids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Maherali et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Deng et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Soltis and Soltis, 2014</xref>). A lot has been discussed about the significance of both auto- and allo- polyploidy in conferring novelty and value addition to plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Levin, 1983</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Lavania and Vimala, 2022</xref>), especially where the plant biomass is the source of economic product, and their active metabolite components are valued in industrial applications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Lavania, 2005</xref>). It was therefore planned to explore whether polyploidy could lead to changes that confer morphological robustness from cultivation perspective, targeting a species that is cultivated through vegetative tillers under commercial cultivation, and the sexual system is deficient.</p>
<p>The genus <italic>Cymbopogon</italic> Spengel comprises a group of aromatic grasses that are either densely or loosely tufted. Although, almost all the species produce essential oil in the secretory cells present in the vegetative tissues of shoot, leaf and inflorescence, but only six species are majorly used for commercial cultivation, and the <italic>C. khasianus</italic> is one of them (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Kumar et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lavania et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Yogendra et al., 2021</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Soenarko (1977)</xref> has provided detailed information on morphological, anatomical, geographical and ecological data on 55 species from taxonomic perspective, pinpointing that most of the species are perennial, where lateral branches/tillers are appressed to the main axis (culm). The perennial growth habit makes the growing tiller prone to lodging, and more so in <italic>C. khasianus</italic> because it becomes taller than the other species in the fast-growing season during warm and humid conditions.</p>
<p>The present study was undertaken to explore ploidy mediated approach to help realize genetic enhancement of an elite clone of an industrially important aromatic grass that suffers from lodging, and examine histo-morphologocal, qualitative and yield contributing characters from breeding perspective.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Plant Material</title>
<p>An elite clone namely &#x201C;CIM-Suwarna&#x201D; of <italic>Cymbopogon khasianus</italic> (Hack) Stapf (ex Bor), (2<italic>n</italic> = 60), developed at the CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow, India (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Lal et al., 2010</xref>) was targeted to develop its clonal autotetraploids. Another clone &#x201C;Krishna&#x201D; of a related species <italic>Cymbopogon flexuosus</italic> said to produce highest concentration of lemongrass essential oil and popular in cultivation was used as a &#x201C;Check.&#x201D;</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Realization of Clonal Polyploids</title>
<p>The target species is an aromatic grass that sports laterally proliferating tiller formation, where meristem is basal and lay deep seated beneath the leaf sheath. As such special efforts are required for colchicine administration for induction of polyploidy. Accordingly, the clonal polyploids were developed following the experimental protocol standardized by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lavania et al. (2012)</xref>. The axillary buds on fast-growing slips (tillers) were exposed to target the basal meristem, followed by immersion of bud bearing region of such slips in 0.1% (v/w) aqueous solution of colchicine in 2% DMSO for 7 h at 25&#x00B0;C, followed by thorough washing in running water and planting in soil. Emerging plantlets were screened for leaf stomata size, and those with uniformly and distinctly enlarged stomata, roughly twice the volume of source diploids, were selected followed by cytological screening to isolate polyploids. Both diploid and polyploid (auto-tetraploid) clones derived from the &#x201C;same source tiller&#x201D; were screened out through six passages of clonal propagation spread over 2 years for ploidy stability, and planted in field for further observations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Micromorphological and Productivity Analysis</title>
<p>Cytologically stable autopolyploids vis-a-vis source diploids were scored for ploidy associated changes in morpho-anatomical features associated with plant biomass, cell geometry of vascular and non-vascular tissue, and essential oil secretory cells by light and fluorescence microscopy.</p>
<p><italic>(i) Tissue preparation for histological examination for essential oil secretory cells:</italic> Hand cut sections of leaf and culm were prepared and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in 0.75% Schiff&#x2019;s reagent. The sections were then washed three times (10 min) with a freshly prepared solution of 0.5% (w/v) sodium metabisulfite in 0.1% HCl and mounted in 1N.HCl according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Lewinsohn et al. (1998)</xref>. The stained sections were examined under microscope using both transmitted light and epifluorescence (blue or UV excitation). The size and frequency of essential oil glands was recorded at 40X magnification. Size of the essential oil secretory cells was calculated with the help of ocular micrometer, and cell frequency estimated by counting the number of cells/cm<sup>2</sup> of the leaf area. Following similar staining procedures, the essential oil cells could also be seen in the surface view.</p>
<p><italic>(ii) Tissue preparation for epicuticular depositions, cell geometry</italic>: To examine phytoliths on leaf surface, cleaned leaf pieces were boiled for 1&#x2013;2 h by gradually raising the temperature of the waterbath from 80 to 100<sup>&#x00B0;</sup>C to digest the soft tissues according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Parry and Smithson (1958)</xref>. Thereafter the leaf pieces were carefully washed and stained in 1% safranin in 70% glycerol, and observed under microscope for recording quantitative measurements. For recording data on cell geometry fresh leaves were scratched to clear the adaxial epidermal surface to record observations on abaxial surface.</p>
<p>To scan epicuticular wax deposition on leaf, the third mature leaf from a well grown tiller was excised, washed thoroughly in dH<sub>2</sub>O distilled water, rinse dried and fixed in 5% Glutaraldehyde overnight and then transferred to phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), followed by dehydration through alcohol series. Air dried samples cut into 2&#x2013;3 mm<sup>2</sup> pieces were loaded on SEM Aluminum stubs using double sided adhesive tape. Samples were coated in POLARON SC-7640 Sputter coater at 18 mA current for 160 s in which Gold-Palladium alloy was used as coating material. The samples were then scanned using a conventional scanning electron microscope LEO-430. The leaf abaxial surface ultra-structural details were examined and exposures were captured at desired magnifications.</p>
<p>To record the width of leaf mid-vein, middle region of the leaf was selected (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Wilkinson, 1979</xref>). The glycerine mounts of hand-cut vertical sections (V.S.) stained in 1% safranin were examined under Nikon Eclipse Ni (Japan) microscope for anatomical characters. The measurements were recorded with a calibrated eyepiece at 100&#x00D7;.</p>
<p><italic>(iii) Biomass and essential oil yield</italic>: For recording observations on biomass and essential oil yield, both progenitor diploid and its corresponding autopolyploid clones, along with a standard &#x201C;Check&#x201D; (clone Krishna of <italic>C. flexuosus</italic>) were grown in 10-m<sup>2</sup> plot with 36 hills per plot and plant to row distance 50 cm at the experimental field of the CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow, India. Data on herbage yield were taken at 4-monthly harvests over 1 year. Essential oil concentration in the leaves harvested at a similar growth stage was estimated by hydrodistillation in Clevenger&#x2019;s equipment adjusted to 60&#x00B0;C and run for 2 h, and qualitative analysis of essential oil was done by GLC.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<p>Both the diploid and its corresponding autopolyploid grown under similar conditions were examined for recording the data on morphological, histological and metric traits and productivity analysis. A general account of observations recorded for morphologial and histological features is provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, and the key features related to realization of sturdiness are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. The data related to yield contributing characters and breeding potential of the developed polyploid clone are provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>. All the qualitative features related to the theme of the study are depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Exomorphology, anatomy and growth related patterns affected by ploidy change (&#x00B1; <italic>SE</italic>) in the <italic>Cymopogon khasianus</italic>.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">S. No.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Characters</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Diploid</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Tetraploid</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Color (as per RHS catalog: Leaf sheath</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Yellow green 146C</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Yellow green 146C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leaf (adaxial)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Green group N137B</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Green group N137B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leaf (abaxial)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Green group 137A</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Green group 137A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stem color</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Yellow green 146D</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Yellow green 146D</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spikelet color</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Grayed green</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Grayed green</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Flowering time</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Nov-Dec</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">September</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of tillers (1 year)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97 &#x00B1; 0.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81 &#x00B1; 0.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of leaves per tiller</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3&#x2013;7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4&#x2013;8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Plant height (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">147 &#x00B1; 0.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">158 &#x00B1; 0.71&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Culm length (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">228 &#x00B1; 0.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">255 &#x00B1; 0.63&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Inflorescence Length (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75 &#x00B1; 0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">97 &#x00B1; 0.53&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of nodes in culm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15 &#x00B1; 0.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12 &#x00B1; 0.31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Length of internode in the middle region of culm (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.0 &#x00B1; 0.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.5 &#x00B1; 0.58&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Average Diameter (cm) of culm between 2nd and 3rd node</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44 &#x00B1; 0.009</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.49 &#x00B1; 0.004&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of vascular bundles in the culm</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">115 &#x00B1; 0.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">145 &#x00B1; 0.88&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Area of the culm cross section occupied by the vascular bundles (mm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.54 &#x00B1; 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.35 &#x00B1; 0.09&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Area (L X B) of single culm vascular bundle of the 3rd concentric ring (&#x03BC;m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22,500 &#x00B1; 687</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31,500 &#x00B1; 814&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Area of Meta-xylem vessel (L &#x00D7; B) culm Vascular Bundle of the 3rd concentric ring (&#x03BC;m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,524 &#x00B1; 54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,857 &#x00B1; 24&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">19</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leaf mesophyll thickness/vascular thickness (&#x03BC;m)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">165 &#x00B1; 6.03/90 &#x00B1; 0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">195 &#x00B1; 5.48&#x002A;/115 &#x00B1; 1.38&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Average thickness of leaf cuticle: adaxial/abaxial (&#x03BC;m)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.7 &#x00B1; 00/1.85 &#x00B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.55 &#x00B1; 0.02&#x002A;/3.7 &#x00B1; 00&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Root Stele diameter (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.936 &#x00B1; 0.038</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.051 &#x00B1; 0.014&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Thickness of root vascular tissue (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.202 &#x00B1; 0.005</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.244 &#x00B1; 0.003&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of vascular bundles in root</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.8 &#x00B1; 0.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.3 &#x00B1; 0.21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Percentage of leaf vascular tissue</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54.54%</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Average Leaf length &#x00D7; width (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100 &#x00B1; 2.0 &#x00D7; 1.24 &#x00B1; 0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92 &#x00B1; 1.8 &#x00D7; 1.31 &#x00B1; 0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">26</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Average number of leaf major vein</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16 &#x00B1; 0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13 &#x00B1; 0.21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">27</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Average distance between major veins (mm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.042 &#x00B1; 0.026</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.210 &#x00B1; 0.044&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">28</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Average leaf area (cm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.18 &#x00B1; 0.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.38 &#x00B1; 0.29&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lumen size of essential oil containing cell (&#x03BC;m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">947 &#x00B1; 21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,747 &#x00B1; 32&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Essential oil concentration in fresh herb (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52 &#x00B1; 0.03<break/>Citral = 82.0%<break/>Geraniol = 3.9%</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.66 &#x00B1; 0.05&#x002A;<break/>Citral = 85.9%<break/>Geraniol = 2.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Area of Leaf midrib in vertical section (&#x03BC;m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">742,500 &#x00B1; 3,163</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,026,000 &#x00B1; 1,391&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">32</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Average number of oil cells in leaf sheath</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">205 &#x00B1; 0.683</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">178.7 &#x00B1; 1.21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Area occupied by bulliform cell/cm<sup>2</sup> of leaf vertical section</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3145 &#x00B1; 0.016</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3093 &#x00B1; 0.006&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Area of stomatal complex (&#x03BC;m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">804.96 &#x00B1; 27.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1260.84 &#x00B1; 34.8&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stomatal index</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.65 &#x00B1; 1.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.9 &#x00B1; 0.802&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stomatal guard cell area (&#x03BC;m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">174.1 &#x00B1; 12.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">254.8 &#x00B1; 35.8&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">37</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Size of leaf epidermal cell (&#x03BC;m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,911 &#x00B1; 119.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,249 &#x00B1; 90.8&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">38</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phytolith size (&#x03BC;m<sup>2</sup>) on leaf abaxial surface</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">261.07 &#x00B1; 22.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">374.11 &#x00B1; 21.17&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Phytolith frequency/mm<sup>2</sup> of leaf abaxial surface</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">106 &#x00B1; 9.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80 &#x00B1; 13.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">40</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Macrohair frequency/mm<sup>2</sup> of leaf abaxial surface</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.61 &#x00B1; 1.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.45 &#x00B1; 3.86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">41</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Size of macrohair (&#x03BC;m<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">530.22 &#x00B1; 24.73</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">850.97 &#x00B1; 34.45&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">42</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wax frequency/10&#x03BC;m<sup>2</sup> (on epidermal surface)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.42 &#x00B1; 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.63 &#x00B1; 0.32</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>&#x002A;Values significantly different with respect to diploid by Student&#x2019;s t-test at P = 0.05.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Histomorphological features in the progenitor diploid and corresponding autotetraploid related to plant hardiness enabling lodging tolerance in the tetraploids.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Name of the species</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Ploidy status</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Hypodermal sclerenchyma thickness of culm cross section (&#x03BC;m) &#x00B1; <italic>SE</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Thickness of vascular region in culm cross section<break/>(mm) &#x00B1; <italic>SE</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Thickness of hypodermal sclerenchyma of leaf<break/>adaxial/abaxial (&#x03BC;m) &#x00B1; <italic>SE</italic><break/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Average wax flake length (&#x03BC;m) on stomata/<break/>epidermal surface &#x00B1; <italic>SE</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Area occupied by phytoliths (mm<sup>2</sup>)/cm<sup>2</sup> of leaf abaxial surface &#x00B1; <italic>SE</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Increase in thickness of hypodermal sclerenchyma in culm in 4<italic>n</italic> over 2<italic>n</italic> (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Increase in thickness of culm vascular region (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Increase in hypodermal sclerenchyma of leaf in 4<italic>n</italic> over 2<italic>n</italic> (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Increase in wax flake length in 4<italic>n</italic> over 2<italic>n</italic> (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Increase in the area occupied by phytoliths in leaf in 4<italic>n</italic> over 2<italic>n</italic> (%)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. khasianus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2<italic>n</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.9 &#x00B1; 0.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.725 &#x00B1; 0.094</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89.02 &#x00B1; 0.92<break/>/69.44 &#x00B1; 1.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.45 &#x00B1; 0.095<break/>/0.921 &#x00B1; 0.062</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.82 &#x00B1; 0.113</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">103.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">4<italic>n</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39.96 &#x00B1; 0.80&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.025 &#x00B1; 0.227&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">117.6 &#x00B1; 1.49&#x002A;<break/>/120.3 &#x00B1; 0.70&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.37 &#x00B1; 0.095&#x002A;<break/>/1.46 &#x00B1; 0.095&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.76 &#x00B1; 0.140&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>&#x002A;Values significantly different with respect to diploid by Student&#x2019;s t-test at P = 0.05.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Essential oil secretory channels and essential oil/biomass yield in the progenitor diploid and corresponding autotetraploid in <italic>Cymbopogon khasianus.</italic></p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Name of the species</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Ploidy status</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Lumen size of essential oil-containing cell (&#x03BC;m<sup>2</sup>) &#x00B1; <italic>SE</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Frequency of essential oil channels/cm<sup>2</sup> of leaf VS &#x00B1; <italic>SE</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Essential oil concentration in fresh herb (%) &#x00B1; <italic>SE</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Area (cm<sup>2</sup>) covered by essential oil-producing cells/cm<sup>2</sup> of leaf VS &#x00B1; <italic>SE</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Number of tillers arising from a slip in 60 days &#x00B1; <italic>SE</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Fresh herb biomass (kg 10 m<sup>&#x2013;2</sup>) &#x00B1; SE</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Increase in essential oil channel area under cover in 4<italic>n</italic> over 2<italic>n</italic> (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Increase in essential oil concentration in 4<italic>n</italic> over 2<italic>n</italic> (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Increase in biomass yield in 4<italic>n</italic> over 2<italic>n</italic> (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Increase in essential oil productivity in 4<italic>n</italic> over 2<italic>n</italic> (%)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. khasianus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2<italic>n</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">947 &#x00B1; 21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3,168 &#x00B1; 97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52 &#x00B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.030 &#x00B1; 0.0002</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.8 &#x00B1; 0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.96 &#x00B1; 0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">4<italic>n</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1,747 &#x00B1; 32&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2,175 &#x00B1; 21&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.66 &#x00B1; 0.05&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.038 &#x00B1; 0.0004&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.4 &#x00B1; 0.22&#x002A;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.87 &#x00B1; 0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>C. flexuosus&#x2014;</italic>clone <italic>Krishna</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2<italic>n</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">412 &#x00B1; 17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,419 &#x00B1; 12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.65 &#x00B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.018 &#x00B1; 0.0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.3 &#x00B1; 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.00 &#x00B1; 0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>&#x002A;Values significantly different with respect to diploid by Student&#x2019;s t-test at P = 0.05.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Development of lodging tolerant autotetraploid <italic>Cymbopogon khasianus.</italic> <bold>(A)</bold> One month old plant of the tetraploid (4<italic>n</italic> = 120) and <bold>(B)</bold> corresponding source diploid (2<italic>n</italic> = 60). <bold>(C&#x2013;E)</bold> Field view of fully grown plants, <bold>(C)</bold> check clone &#x201C;Krishna&#x201D;, <bold>(D)</bold> lodging tolerant autotetraploid, and <bold>(E)</bold> lodging diploid progenitor.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-908659-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Somatic chromosomes and pollen grains of <italic>C. khasianus:</italic> somatic chromosomes <bold>(A)</bold> source diploid (2<italic>n</italic> = 60) and <bold>(B)</bold> autotetraploid (4<italic>n</italic> = 120); pollen grains &#x2013; <bold>(C)</bold> diploid, <bold>(D)</bold> tetraploid.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-908659-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>SEM images of leaf surface features in <italic>Cymbopogon khasianus</italic> in the diploid (upper column) vs. autotetraploid (lower column) showing: <bold>(A&#x2013;D)</bold>. Stomata with cuticuler wax deposition, <bold>(B&#x2013;E)</bold>. Wax crystals, and <bold>(C&#x2013;F)</bold>. Phytolith (small arrow) and macro-hair (large arrow).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-908659-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Leaf epidermal features in <italic>Cymbopogon khasianus</italic> in the diploid (upper column) vs. autotetraploid (lower column) showing: <bold>(A&#x2013;D)</bold>. Phytolith (arrow marked)/stomata, <bold>(B&#x2013;E)</bold> secretory channels filled with essential oil (stained magenta), <bold>(C&#x2013;F)</bold> cuticle thickness.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-908659-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>VS of leaf (mid rib section) and TS of culm (partial) in the diploid (left) and tetraploid (right). Note, enhanced thickening/sclerenchymatus regions in the hypodermal and vascular bundle region in the tetraploid. Sclae bar = 200 &#x03BC;.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-908659-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>It is observed that there is an overall increase in body size of the developed polyploid. This is consummated through increased cell size at all the organizational levels, including tissues, organs, and micromorphological constituents, and their associated developmental changes in cell wall thickening, and metabolic changes related to photosynthetic efficiency and secretion of secondary metabolites in the form of the essential oil. Whereas, tissue thickening enables plant sturdiness, an increased cell size adds to biomass and physiological efficiency for enhanced essential oil concentration, leading to overall lodging tolerance and enhanced productivity of the economic product. Specific details based on these observations are dealt in discussion section.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Vast data accumulated on the biology of polyploids for over more than 100 years suggest that polyploids are sturdier than diploids owing to the thicker stem and leaves and associated corresponding changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Ramsey and Ramsey, 2014</xref>), sporting enhanced efficiency in stressed environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Pandit et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">teBeest et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Levin, 2019</xref>), as also offering the advantage of evolutionary novelty (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Levin, 2002</xref>), and profound amenability in diverse habitats, albeit having restricted distribution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Villa et al., 2022</xref>). It is with this background that the present study was undertaken on a supposedly paleo-hexaploid (2<italic>n</italic> = 60) species of the <italic>Cymbopogon</italic> species complex (base number &#x00D7; = 10, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Soenarko, 1977</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Lavania, 1988</xref>) to further enhance its biological potential by ploidy elevation for wider adaptability and enhanced productivity.</p>
<p>The results presented here demonstrate successful realization of genetically stable clonal autopolyploids in a commercially important aromatic grass valued for its citral rich essential oil used for its multifarious applications in aroma industry. Whereas, the target species used in this study is known to produce high biomass compared to other species of the genus, but the high biomass producing canopy <italic>per se</italic> is fraught with danger of lodging when challenged by intense air velocity and rains encountered in the fast-growing season. The instant induced polyploid reported here has been found to overcome such lodging challenge on account of stout stem, thicker and broader leaves realized in the polyploid owing to enhanced sclerenchyma in the vascular and epidermal regions and waxy coating/siliceous phytolith in the cuticular surface. At the same time the induced polyploid offers commercial advantage of enhanced biomass and increased concentration of essential oil, thus a dual advantage from cultivation perspective.</p>
<p>Comparative assay of micromorphological characters in diploids and autotetraploids reveal a clear-cut increase in the cell size reflected at all levels, including epidermal cells, vascular tissue, stomatal guard cells, essential oil secretory cells, phytolith size, cuticle thickness, and even epicuticular waxy deposition, albeit there is decrease in frequency of all such cells in per unit area. Nevertheless, there is an overall enhancement in the area occupied by the cells constituting larger tissues and organs. In particular, for the tissues contributing to economically important part, i.e., essential oil secreting cells in the source biomass, there is an overall increase in the area occupied by the essential oil secreting cells by 26.7%, and biomass yield by 20.3%, essential oil concentration by 26.9%, enabling an overall increase in essential oil productivity by 34%. At the same time the instant polyploid clone could withstand lodging pressure challenged by strong air currents and heavy rains encountered during the growing season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1D</xref>). Further, when compared with an elite clone &#x201C;Krishna&#x201D; of a related species <italic>Cymbopogon flexuosus</italic>&#x2014;taken as &#x201C;Check&#x201D; (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>), the polyploid clone of <italic>C. khasaianus</italic> is superior by 237% in terms of the productivity of the economic product, i.e., citral rich essential oil.</p>
<p>The exhaustive data presented amply suggest that there is an overall increase in body size of the developed polyploid consummated through increased cell size at organizational levels, including tissues, organs and micromorphological constituents, and their associated developmental and metabolic changes. The major constituent components that deserve particular attention are highlighted below:-</p>
<sec id="S4.SS1">
<title>Vascular Thickening Adds to Robustness and Lodging Tolerance</title>
<p>The findings presented in this study provide an exhaustive account of cell size associated comparisons between the diploid and the derived isogenic clonal polyploid (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Tables 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). Such an elaborated account on ploidy associated changes has not been presented before. It is observed that with the increase in cell size in the tetraploid there are associated changes in the constituting tissues and organs, including cell wall thickening, secretions and waxy/siliceous phytolith depositions, and more particularly the hypodermal sclerenchyma thickness in the culm and leaf by a factor of &#x003E; 50% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). It would be obvious that such enhanced thickening in the vascular tissues and depositions in the cuticular regions would impart physical robustness. The relative ratio toward thick walled sclerenchymatous regions would further add to robusticity, and in turn tolerance to physical pressures. Such a manifestation is in tune with the ecological behavior of neopolyploids known to demonstrate larger phenotypic and ecological ranges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Barker et al., 2012</xref>), through avoidance of competition with their established diploid parents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Hegarty et al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>The extracellular matrix constituting the cell wall is mainly composed of polysaccharides and structural proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Burton et al., 2010</xref>). The cell types appear to have a typical size range closely associated with function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Amodeo and Skotheim, 2016</xref>), characteristically optimized for cell fitness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Miettinen and Bj&#x00F6;rklund, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Vargas-Garcia et al., 2018</xref>). This is achieved through constant adjustment of cell wall composition and rearrangement of wall polysaccharides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cosgrove, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baker et al. (2017)</xref> have hypothesized that tetraploidy results in trait disintegration allowing for transgressive phenotypes emanating from changs in morphological, anatomical and physiological traits. A balanced ratio of structural components in the cell wall rearrangement facilitates wall rigidity, flexibility for cell dynamics, and enhanced potential for growth and development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Westermann, 2021</xref>), that could enable wider adaptability and robusticity to the polyploids. All this fits well in present set of things.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS2">
<title>Cell Size Contributes to Enhanced Physiological Efficiency and Increased Productivity</title>
<p>The key observation made out in this study is that there is an increase in cell size/wall thickening of the constituent cells of different tissues and organs on account of ploidy change. Such an effect is global and is observable in the overall organization of the polyploid clone (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Tables 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). This is more clearly discerned in the size of stomatal guard cells, epidermal cells and essential oil secretory cells, and physiological activity in terms of chlorophyll content and waxy secretion/phytolith deposition. The increase in lumen size of the secretory cell is approximately double the volume compared to the source diploids, but in terms of overall area occupied by such cells this is accounted to &#x223C;25%, which is also reflected in terms of essential oil concentration and yield of biomass and productivity of the economic product (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<p>A clear instance of increase in cell size as measured at the level of stomatal guard cells with ploidy change across the species has earlier been observed in <italic>Coffea</italic> spp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Mishra, 1997</xref>), and in relation to essential concentration in <italic>Cymbopogon</italic> spp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Janaki-Ammal and Gupta, 1966</xref>), and at autopolyploid level in different species of <italic>Cympopogon</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lavania et al., 2012</xref>). Extensive study undertaken by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Soenarko (1977)</xref> on systematics and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Lavania (1988)</xref> on cytology, lists the occurrence of natural ploidy series across the species with 2<italic>n</italic> = 20, 40, 60, wherein <italic>C. khasianus</italic> belongs to 2<italic>n</italic> = 60 series. A comparison of stomatal guard cells and essential oil secretory cells shows corresponding increase in cell size with ploidy series. Obviously, the stomata/essential oil secretory cells in <italic>C. khasianus</italic> are distinctly larger compared to natural diploids, and the same is reflected in the derived autopolyploids sporting further enlargement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lavania et al., 2012</xref>), and is commensurate to ploidy elevation.</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Doyle and Coate (2019)</xref> provide an elaborated account on the impact of genome doubling on the biology of cell vis-a-vis physiological and morphological novely. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Trojak-Goluch et al. (2021)</xref> have discussed the prospective applications of artificial polyploidy in plant breeding of industrial crops. Whereas, manifestation of &#x201C;gigas&#x201D; effect in the phenotype is a common feature reflected in the neopolyploids but decrease in the ratio of nuclear membrane to chromatin brings more surface area to come in contact to genetic activity enabling higher physiological activity and developmental changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lavania et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Doyle and Coate, 2019</xref>) in general, and secondary plant products in particular (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Lavania, 2005</xref>). Since stomata are associated with various physiological activities in cell like water and CO<sub>2</sub> exchange, therefore, ploidy level may influence physiological activities too (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Lea et al., 1977</xref>). Of course, manifestation of such effect could be genotype and species dependent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Lavania, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lavania et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S5">
<title>Concluding Remarks</title>
<p>Artificial polyploidy is known to increase cell size in plants; axiomatically it is likely to enhance cell size of organs and tissues involved in metabolite production. However, effect of such polyploidy mediated changes could be species specific that could be inferred from micro-morphological examination of key components. <italic>Cymbopogon</italic> is a perennial C4 aromatic grass with numerous stiff stems arising from a short, rhizomatous root stock, indigenous to tropical and sub-tropical parts of the world. In these aromatic grasses the essential oil is stored in secretory channels that run parallel to the leaf mesophyll on the abaxial side embedded in between the vascular cylinders. The essential oil synthesis is at its maximum secretion with the onset of blooming. However, the fast growing tillers reaching the blooming stage are prone to lodging when challenged by strong winds and heavy showers. Therefore, realizing plant hardiness is considered an important requirement for optimum harvest. The present study on the development of lodging tolerant plants is an important step that could be achieved through induced polyploidy, vis-a-vis adding to enhanced productivity without causing any adverse effect (related to seed-based cultivation posed on account of autopolyploidy) on cultivation since the cultivation of this grass is done through vegetative plantation as the standard practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>YV conceptualized and reviewed the manuscript. UL conceived the experimentation, performed the field evaluation, and drafted the manuscript. MS and SL performed micromorphological analysis and histological studies. SS and SB jointly did cytological screening. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="pudiscl1" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="S8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was funded by the CSIR Emeritus grant to SL and INSA Senior Scientist support to UL.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alix</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x00E9;rard</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwarzacher</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heslop-Harrison</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Polyploidy and interspecifc hybridization: partners for adaptation, speciation and evolution in plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>120</volume> <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>194</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcx079</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28854567</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amodeo</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skotheim</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Cell-size control.</article-title> <source><italic>Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>a019083</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yarkhunova</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vidal</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ewers</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weinig</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Polyploidy and the relationship between leaf structure and function: implications for correlated evolution of anatomy, morphology, and physiology in Brassica.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume>:<issue>3</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-016-0957-3</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28056801</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barker</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baute</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.-L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>&#x201C;Duplications and turnover in plant genomes,&#x201D;</article-title> in <source><italic>Plant Genome Diversity</italic></source>, <volume>Vol. 1</volume>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Greilhuber</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dolezel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wendel</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Vienna</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>169</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burton</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gidley</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fincher</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Heterogeneity in the chemistry, structure and function of plant cell walls.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Chem. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>724</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>732</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nchembio.439</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20852610</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cosgrove</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Diffuse growth of plant cell walls.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>176</volume> <fpage>16</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.17.01541</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29138349</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Antioxidant response to drought, cold and nutrient stress in two ploidy levels of tobacco plants: low resource requirement confers poly tolerance in polyploids?</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Growth Regul.</italic></source> <volume>66</volume> <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10725-011-9626-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Doyle</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coate</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Polyploidy, the nucleotype, and novelty: the impact of genome doubling on the biology of the cell.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>180</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/700636</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hegarty</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barker</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brennan</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abbott</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hiscock</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Changes to gene expression associated with hybrid speciation in plants: further insights from transcriptomic studies in Senecio.</article-title> <source><italic>Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B</italic></source> <volume>363</volume> <fpage>3055</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3069</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Janaki Ammal</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>B. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1966</year>). <article-title>Oil content in relation to polyploidy in <italic>Cymbopogon</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B</italic></source> <volume>64</volume> <fpage>334</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>335</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf03052137</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dwivedi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kukreja</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bagchi</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name></person-group> <role>(eds.)</role> (<year>2000</year>). <source><italic>Cymbopogon- the Aromatic Grasses Monograph.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Lucknow</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lal</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chandra</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chauhan</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Misra</surname> <given-names>H. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srikrishna</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>A high yielding variety of lemongrass (<italic>Cymbopogon khasianus</italic>) &#x2018;CIM-SUWARNA&#x2019; suitable for water stress/rainfed/marginal land conditions.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Med. Arom. Pl. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>32</volume> <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lavania</surname> <given-names>U. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Karyomorphological observations in <italic>Cymbopogon</italic> Sprengel.</article-title> <source><italic>Cytologia</italic></source> <volume>53</volume> <fpage>517</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>524</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1508/cytologia.53.517</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lavania</surname> <given-names>U. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Genomic and ploidy manipulation for enhanced production of phyto-pharmaceuticals.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Genet. Resour.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>170</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>177</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/pgr200576</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lavania</surname> <given-names>U. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Plant speciation and polyploidy: in habitat divergence and environmental perspective.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleus</italic></source> <volume>63</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13237-020-00311-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lavania</surname> <given-names>U. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Ploidy dependence of chromosomal variation in callus cultures of <italic>Hyoscyamus muticus</italic> L.</article-title> <source><italic>Protoplasma</italic></source> <volume>145</volume> <fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf01323256</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lavania</surname> <given-names>U. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Evolutionary genomic change paralleled by diferential responses of 2&#x00D7; and 4&#x00D7; calli cultures.</article-title> <source><italic>Experientia</italic></source> <volume>46</volume> <fpage>322</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>324</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf01951778</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lavania</surname> <given-names>U. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lavania</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Basu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Misra</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mukai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Autopolyploidy differentially influences body size in plants, but facilitates enhanced accumulation of secondary metabolites, causing increased cytosine methylation.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant J.</italic></source> <volume>71</volume> <fpage>539</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>549</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05006.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22449082</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lavania</surname> <given-names>U. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vimala</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Synthetic hybrid speciation: a resource for breeding novel lineages for secondary metabolites.</article-title> <source><italic>Nucleus</italic></source> <volume>65</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13237-022-00384-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lea</surname> <given-names>H. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunn</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koch</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Stomatal diffusion resistance in three ploidy levels of smooth bromegrass.</article-title> <source><italic>Crop Sci.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>91</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183x001700010026x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levin</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Am. Nat.</italic></source> <volume>122</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/284115</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levin</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <source><italic>The Role of Chromosomal Change in Plant Evolution.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levin</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Plant speciation in the age of climate change.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>124</volume> <fpage>769</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>775</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcz108</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31250895</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lewinsohn</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dudai</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tadmor</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Katzir</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ravid</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Putievsky</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Histochemical localization of citral accumulation in lemongrass leaves (<italic>Cymbopogon citratus</italic> (D.C.) Stapf. Poaceae).</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Bot</italic></source> <volume>81</volume> <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/anbo.1997.0525</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maherali</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walden</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Husband</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Genome duplication and the evolution of physiological responses to water stress.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>184</volume> <fpage>721</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>731</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02997.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19703115</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miettinen</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bj&#x00F6;rklund</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Cellular allometry of mitochondrial functionality establishes the optimal cell size.</article-title> <source><italic>Dev. Cell</italic></source> <volume>39</volume> <fpage>370</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>382</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2016.09.004</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27720611</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Stomatal characterization at different ploidy levels in Coffea.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>80</volume> <fpage>689</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>692</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/anbo.1997.0491</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moraes</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Engel</surname> <given-names>T. B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forni-Martins</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Barros</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Felix</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cabral</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Are chromosome number and genome size associated with habit and environmental niche variables? Insights from the Neotropical orchids.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann.Bot.</italic></source> <fpage>mcac021</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcac021</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35143612</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pandit</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pocock</surname> <given-names>M. J. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kunin</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Ploidy influences rarity and invasiveness in plants.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>99</volume> <fpage>1108</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1115</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01838.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parry</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smithson</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1958</year>). <article-title>Silicification of bulliform cells in grasses.</article-title> <source><italic>Nature</italic></source> <volume>181</volume> <fpage>1549</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1550</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00530.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22188340</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramsey</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramsey</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Ecological studies of polyploidy in the 100 years following its discovery.</article-title> <source><italic>Phil.Trans. R. Soc. B.</italic></source> <volume>369</volume>:<issue>20130352</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2013.0352</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24958925</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soenarko</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>The genus <italic>Cymbopogon</italic> Sprengel (Gramineae).</article-title> <source><italic>Reinwardtia</italic></source> <volume>9</volume> <fpage>225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>375</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Flower diversity and angiosperm diversification.</article-title> <source><italic>Methods Mol. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>1110</volume> <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-4614-9408-9_4</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24395253</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stebbins</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>A brief summary of my ideas on evolution.</article-title> <source><italic>Am J Bot.</italic></source> <volume>86</volume> <fpage>1207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1208</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2656985</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10449401</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>teBeest</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>LeRoux</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brysting</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suda</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kubesov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>109</volume> <fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcr277</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22040744</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trojak-Goluch</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kawka-Lipi&#x0144;ska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wielgusz</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Praczyk</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Polyploidy in industrial crops: applications and perspectives.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Breed. Agronomy</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>2574</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy11122574</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van de Peer</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ashman</surname> <given-names>T.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Polyploidy: an evolutionary and ecological force in stressful times.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell</italic></source> <volume>33</volume> <fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/plcell/koaa015</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33751096</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van de Peer</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mizrachi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marchal</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The evolutionary significance of polyploidy.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Rev. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>18</volume> <fpage>411</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>424</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrg.2017.26</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28502977</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vargas-Garcia</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghusinga</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Cell size control and gene expression homeostasis in single-cells.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>116</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.coisb.2018.01.002</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29862376</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Villa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montagna</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pierce</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Endemism in recently diverged angiosperms is associated with polyploidy.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>223</volume> <fpage>479</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>492</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11258-022-01223-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wendel</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The wondrous cycles of polyploidy in plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Am. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>102</volume> <fpage>1753</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1756</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.1500320</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26451037</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Westermann</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Two is company, but four is a party&#x2014;Challenges of tetraploidization for cell wall dynamics and efficient tip-growth in pollen.</article-title> <source><italic>Plants</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<issue>2382</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants10112382</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34834745</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wilkinson</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1979</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>The plant surface</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Anatomy of the Dicotyledons</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Metcalf</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chalk</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Clarendon Press</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yogendra</surname> <given-names>N. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nazeer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eresha, Yadav</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baskaran</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pragadheesh</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Comparative morphological assessment of lemongrass (<italic>Cymbopogon</italic> spp.) cultivars for oil yield, chemical composition and quality parameters under southern region of India.</article-title> <source><italic>Madras Agric. J.</italic></source> <volume>108</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29321/MAJ.10.000564</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35428308</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The plant cell wall: Biosynthesis, construction, and functions.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Integr. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>63</volume> <fpage>251</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>272</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jipb.13055</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33325153</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>