<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1141692</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Comparative transcriptome profiling provides insights into the growth promotion activity of <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> strain SLU99 in tomato and potato plants</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hanifah</surname>
<given-names>Nurul Atilia Shafienaz binti</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1048764"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghadamgahi</surname>
<given-names>Farideh</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1284010"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname>
<given-names>Samrat</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/533910"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ortiz</surname>
<given-names>Rodomiro</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/202395"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Whisson</surname>
<given-names>Stephen C.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/313019"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Vetukuri</surname>
<given-names>Ramesh R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/312953"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Kalyandurg</surname>
<given-names>Pruthvi B.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2162894"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Plant Breeding, Horticum, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Lomma</addr-line>, <country>Sweden</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Agrobiodiversity and Environment Research Centre, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI)</institution>, <addr-line>Serdang, Selangor</addr-line>, <country>Malaysia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Cell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute</institution>, <addr-line>Dundee</addr-line>, <country>United Kingdom</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Islam A. Abd El-Daim, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Ho Won Jung, Dong-A University, Republic of Korea; Alfonso M&#xe9;ndez-Bravo, Morelia Unit, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Pruthvi B. Kalyandurg, <email xlink:href="mailto:pruthvi.balachandra@slu.se">pruthvi.balachandra@slu.se</email>; Ramesh R. Vetukuri, <email xlink:href="mailto:ramesh.vetukuri@slu.se">ramesh.vetukuri@slu.se</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1141692</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>10</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>03</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Hanifah, Ghadamgahi, Ghosh, Ortiz, Whisson, Vetukuri and Kalyandurg</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Hanifah, Ghadamgahi, Ghosh, Ortiz, Whisson, Vetukuri and Kalyandurg</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The use of biocontrol agents with plant growth-promoting activity has emerged as an approach to support sustainable agriculture. During our field evaluation of potato plants treated with biocontrol rhizobacteria, four bacteria were associated with increased plant height. Using two important solanaceous crop plants, tomato and potato, we carried out a comparative analysis of the growth-promoting activity of the four bacterial strains: <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> SLU99, <italic>Serratia plymuthica</italic> S412, <italic>S. rubidaea</italic> AV10, and <italic>S. rubidaea</italic> EV23. Greenhouse and <italic>in vitro</italic> experiments showed that <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> SLU99 promoted plant height, biomass accumulation, and yield of potato and tomato plants, while EV23 promoted growth in potato but not in tomato plants. SLU99 induced the expression of plant hormone-related genes in potato and tomato, especially those involved in maintaining homeostasis of auxin, cytokinin, gibberellic acid and ethylene. Our results reveal potential mechanisms underlying the growth promotion and biocontrol effects of these rhizobacteria and suggest which strains may be best deployed for sustainably improving crop yield.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>PGPR - plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>beneficial bacteria</kwd>
<kwd>IAA</kwd>
<kwd>ethylene</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Serratia</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>transcriptome (RNA-seq)</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Svenska Forskningsr&#xe5;det Formas<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001862</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="89"/>
<page-count count="163"/>
<word-count count="7682"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Symbiotic Interactions</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The plant rhizosphere is a significant carbon sink (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Strand et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Drigo et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>), and represents an ecosystem hosting a diverse microbial community, including a variety of phytopathogens. The co-evolution of plants and microbial communities has led to the formation of complex symbiotic associations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Delaux and Schornack, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdelfattah et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Several studies have indicated that plants recruit specific microbial communities through root exudates, positively regulating the rhizosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Besserer et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">De Weert et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Rudrappa et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). Through secreting secondary metabolites such as pyrrolnitrin and fusaricidin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Burkhead et&#xa0;al., 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Vater et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), outer membrane vesicles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">McMillan et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) and phytohormones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Tsukanova et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), microbial communities assist plants in their defence against pathogens by priming plant defences while keeping severe immune responses to a minimum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Van Wees et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). Termed biological control agents (BCA), several bacterial genera including <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, <italic>Serratia</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, and <italic>Azospirillum</italic> compete in the rhizosphere environment with pathogens through siderophore biosynthesis, antibiosis, lytic enzyme production and detoxification, thus protecting the plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Loper, 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Loper and Henkels, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Compant et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Anzalone et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Some species of rhizospheric BCA, known as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), have long been known to enhance plant growth through the secretion of auxin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">P&#x159;ikryl et&#xa0;al., 1985</xref>), cytokinin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Tien et&#xa0;al., 1979</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Timmusk et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>), 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Glick et&#xa0;al., 1994</xref>), nitrogen fixation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bal et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), volatile organic compound (VOC) production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Tahir et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), and phosphate solubilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Son et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Olanrewaju et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Many PGPR modulate root architecture, promote shoot elongation, and increase chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Diagne et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). One of the most common alterations induced by PGPR in the root system architecture is the increased formation of lateral roots (LR) and root hairs (RH), thus assisting in improved water and nutrient acquisition from the soil. Changes in root system architecture (RSA) could be caused by PGPR interference with the signaling in the main hormonal pathways regulating plant root development, namely auxin and cytokinin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ali et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Dodd et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). PGPRs also promote plant growth by reducing stress-related ethylene levels <italic>via</italic> ACC deaminase activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Glick et&#xa0;al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Hardoim et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Amna et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). PGPR have been demonstrated to be beneficial for several important crop species including tomato, apple, grapes, and cereals such as rice, wheat and maize (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Kumari et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>
<italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. are Gram-negative, chemoheterotrophic, motile rod-shaped bacteria that are adapted to a wide range of ecological niches. Extensive research has shown that several <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> strains function as PGPR through diverse metabolic capabilities. <italic>P. putida</italic> isolate WCS358 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Zamioudis et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>) and <italic>P. chlororaphis</italic> subsp. <italic>aurantiaca</italic> strain JD37 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Fang et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>) isolated from potato rhizosphere promote plant growth in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> and maize, respectively. <italic>P. putida</italic> isolate GR12-2 enhances root elongation through the ethylene pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Glick et&#xa0;al., 1994</xref>) and root branching by producing cyclodipeptides that modulate auxin responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ortiz-Castro et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Furthermore, we have recently demonstrated that <italic>P. aeruginosa</italic> encodes genes for tryptophan biosynthesis and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) synthesis, and promotes tomato growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ghadamgahi et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> strain WCS365 has been shown to colonize both tomato and potato rhizospheres (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Mercado-Blanco and Bakker, 2007</xref>). <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> strain WCS417 inhibits primary root elongation while stimulating LR and RH development through auxin signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Zamioudis et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>
<italic>Serratia</italic> sp. are Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae. Several species of <italic>Serratia</italic> are reported to enhance plant growth, such as <italic>S. fonticola</italic> strain AU-P3 and <italic>Serratia</italic> sp. SY5 that promote growth in pea and maize plants, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Koo and Cho, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Devi et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Recently, it was reported that <italic>Serratia rubidaea</italic> strain ED1 promotes seed germination in quinoa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Mahdi et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>A shift in societal acceptance away from using harmful and often expensive chemical fertilizers to a safer and natural alternative, combined with the increasing challenges of climate change and the growing world population, has resulted in PGPR drawing increased attention. The effects of PGPR-plant interactions on molecular mechanisms are complex and may vary depending on the strain or consortia of strains, plant species, and receiving environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Tsukanova et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Understanding how a beneficial bacterium improves the growth and health of a specific crop in a specific environment is therefore critical.</p>
<p>The complex effects of PGPR on plant gene expression, including genes that play key roles in signal transduction, metabolism, and catabolism of plant hormones have been reported in several studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Shen et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Tsukanova et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Wei et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). However, studies on global transcriptomic changes induced by PGPR treatment in the context of plant growth and development are limited. Moreover, to our knowledge, there is no report on the transcriptome profiling of potato plants under PGPR treatment. Understanding how plants including potato and tomato respond to PGPR treatment will greatly empower the usage of PGPR towards enhancing sustainable agriculture.</p>
<p>The aim of this study was to conduct a holistic study on the effect of PGPR on potato and tomato growth and select the best-performing PGPR to gain insights into their mechanism of action. The strains used in this study were isolated from potato and tomato rhizosphere soils. <italic>In vitro</italic> antagonistic analysis indicated a strong activity against plant pathogens, including <italic>P. colocasiae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Kelbessa et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>)<italic>, P. infestans</italic> and <italic>R. solani</italic> (unpublished). To that end, we carried out a field trial with six bacteria with biological control activity on potato plants in a high disease pressure <italic>P. infestans</italic> infested field. Selected strains associated with increased potato growth were then tested under greenhouse conditions for growth-promoting activity. Further, we carried out transcriptome profiling of potato and tomato roots and leaves treated with the bacterial supernatant to gain insight into the growth promotion mechanisms of <italic>P. fluorescens.</italic>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Field trial</title>
<p>Field experiments were carried out in the summer of 2020 using the potato cultivar Kuras. A total of six bacterial isolates that displayed antagonistic activity against <italic>Phytophthora infestans</italic> under lab conditions were assessed for their plant growth promotion activity. These strains include <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> SLU99, <italic>Serratia rubidaea</italic> EV23 and AV10, <italic>S. plymuthica</italic> S412 and AS13, and <italic>S. proteamaculans</italic> S4. A single colony of each bacterial strain was cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) liquid for 16 h at 28&#xb0;C. Then the cultures were centrifuged at 3000 &#xd7; g for 10 min and the bacterial cells were resuspended in 5 L sterile water to a final OD<sub>600</sub> 0.2. The bacterial suspension was transferred to a 5 L pressure sprayer for field application, and water treatment was used as a control. The testing site was Mosslunda, near the city of Kristianstad, Sweden (55&#xb0;58&#x2019;00.3&#x201d;N 14&#xb0;07&#x2019;03.0&#x201d;E) where the average daily temperature ranged between 12 and 18&#xb0;C and average monthly precipitation was 42-64 mm, with an average daylength was 17.5 hours. The experiment was carried out in a plot with four rows of 10 meters in width and 15 meters in length. The experimental design consisted of randomized block design with four blocks. Each block contained all eight treatments distributed randomly, with 10 plants per treatment. The potato plants were sprayed with six biocontrol bacteria (individual treatments) once every two weeks for a period of eight weeks. Statistical analysis of plant height was performed using JMPpro software.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Greenhouse and PGPR treatment</title>
<p>To evaluate the effects of selected rhizobacteria on tomato and potato plant growth, a pot experiment was conducted for each crop in two separate plant cultivation chambers (biotron). Nine and ten biological replicates were used for tomato and potato, respectively. The tomato seeds were surface sterilized using 3% sodium hypochlorite (v/v) followed by washing with sterile water three times before sowing in a 105-hole seed tray filled with nursery soil. At 25 days after sowing, uniform four-leaf stage seedlings were transplanted into 1 L pots containing 325 g of nursery soil (1 seedling/pot). For bacterial inoculations, strains SLU99, EV23, AV10 and S412 were cultured as described in the previous section. Thirty-five milliliters of bacterial suspensions at OD<sub>600</sub> 0.2 prepared with 1 &#xd7; phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or only 1 &#xd7; PBS (control treatment) was added to the roots of 25-day-old tomato seedlings. For potato, all seed tubers were first cleaned with water, treated with 100 ppm gibberellic acid, and dried for eight days to promote bud initiation. Prior to planting in 2 L pots (containing 650 g nursery soil), the seed tubers were inoculated with bacteria suspension at OD<sub>600</sub> 0.2 prepared with 1 &#xd7; PBS or with only 1 &#xd7; PBS for 15 min.</p>
<p>The inoculation was repeated twice, once at 10 and 30 days after transplanting (DAT) for tomato or days after planting (DAP) for potato with 35 ml bacterial suspension (OD<sub>600</sub> 0.2) per plant in both crops to ensure the growth of bacteria in the soil. The liquid was poured 2-3 cm from each plant&#x2019;s base and 5 cm deep in the soil. For the duration of the experiments, the plants were grown in two separate growth chambers in 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiods supplemented with 250 &#xb5;mol m-2 s-1 light, temperatures of 20-23&#xb0;C and 60% humidity for 60 days. The plant positions within the growth chambers were randomly rearranged at least twice a week.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Phenotyping</title>
<p>To determine the effects of selected rhizobacteria on plant growth, parameters of plant height, total plant dry weight and yield were measured. Plant height was measured from the soil surface to the tip of the plant every ten days from planting until harvest. The yield of tomato and potato were measured by total fruit or tuber number and total fresh weight. Firstly, fruit or tubers were harvested, counted, and weighed. Then, the shoot and root systems were separated. Leaves were separated from the plant by cutting the leaf petiole, and the stems were cut. The number of leaves was counted and recorded. The intact roots were gently shaken to remove soil, briefly washed with water, and gently blotted dry using paper towels. Then, immediately the roots, leaves, stems, and fruits/tubers were separately placed in paper bags and oven-dried at 65&#xb0;C until they reached constant weight. Finally, the dry weight was measured using a precision scale and recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Chlorophyll content index measurement</title>
<p>The chlorophyll content of tomato and potato plants grown in the growth chamber were measured at harvest using the MC-100 Chlorophyll Concentration Meter (Apogee Instruments Inc., Logan, UT, USA). The MC-100 was calibrated to measure chlorophyll concentration with units of chlorophyll content index (CCI) and zeroed before commencing measurement according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions (Apogee Instruments, 2018). For tomato plants, the measurements were made by clipping the sensor onto the second terminal leaflet on the fifth fully expanded leaf from the top of each plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Matsuda et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). For potato plants, the measurements were made on the top point of the top leaflet of the 4th compound leaf (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Li et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Soil sampling and analysis</title>
<p>To evaluate the effects of rhizobacteria applications on soil nutrient content, rhizosphere soils were collected and pooled from all pots of each bacterial treatment for analysis. For the control treatment, soils were collected from eight randomly selected non-inoculated plants. 30g of dried soil samples were sent to the LMI AB testing laboratory (Helsingborg, Sweden) for analysis. The soils sampled before planting and at harvest were analyzed for pH, soil organic matter (SOM), electrical conductivity (EC), total nitrogen, available phosphorus (P), and available potassium (K).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>
<italic>In vitro</italic> growth conditions for plants</title>
<p>Tomato seeds or potato explants were grown in half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) culture medium (M0221; Duchefa Biochemie B.V., Haarlem, The Netherlands), pH 5.8, supplemented with 0.25% (w/v) Phytagel (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, United States), 0.05% (w/v) 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES) and 1% sucrose (w/v) (Duchefa Biochemie B.V., Haarlem, The Netherlands). For SLU99 treatment, bacteria were cultured overnight in LB until an OD<sub>600</sub> of 2 was reached. Cell-free supernatant was obtained by centrifuging at 3000 &#xd7; g for 10 min, filtered through a 0.22-&#x3bc;m filter and mixed with &#xbd; MS medium at 1:10 ratio before plating. For mock treatment, 0.22-&#x3bc;m sterile filtered liquid LB media was mixed with &#xbd; MS media at 1:10 ratio before plating seeds or explants. Tomato var Moneymaker seeds were obtained from Plantagen AB and were surface sterilized with 3% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 5 min and washed three times with sterile water. Seeds were then plated either on control or SLU99 supernatant supplemented &#xbd; MS plates and stratified for 48 h at 4&#xb0;C. For potato plants, the explants from sterile potato plants were grown either on mock-treated or SLU99 supernatant supplemented &#xbd; MS media in plant tissue culture boxes. The plants were grown in a growth chamber with 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiods and temperatures of 20-22&#xb0;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Transcriptome analysis</title>
<p>For RNA-seq analysis, leaf or root samples were collected for each treatment and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted from three biological replicates using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Each biological replicate represented a pool of leaves or roots from three individual plants. The quality and integrity of the RNA was measured using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, California, USA). Library preparation was carried out using a  TruSeq RNA poly-A selection kit (Illumina, Inc.). Sequencing was performed at National Genomics Infrastructure (NGI), Stockholm on an Illumina NovaSeq6000 S4 platform. Adapter sequences and poor quality reads (&lt;Q30) were removed using BBduk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Bushnell et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Next, cleaned data were fed into STAR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Dobin et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>) for alignment against the reference genome. FeatureCounts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Liao et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>) was used for the quantification of aligned reads. Finally, R package DEseq2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Love et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>) was used for the analysis of differential gene expression and normalization. For volcano plots, R package ggplot2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ito and Murphy, 2013</xref>) was used. Pathway and enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes was carried out with the R package clusterProfiler (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Wu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>RT-qPCR analysis</title>
<p>Total RNA (1 &#x3bc;g) extracted for the purpose of transcriptome analysis was used for reverse transcription using qScript cDNA synthesis kit (Quantabio, Beverly, MA) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. 4 &#x3bc;L of 10-fold diluted cDNA was used as a template for the real-time PCR. Quantitative PCR was performed using DyNAmo Flash SYBR green kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions with three biological replicates and three technical replicates for each biological replicate. Relative expression levels of each of the target genes were normalized to that of tomato tubulin (<italic>SlTub</italic>) gene for quantification using the &#x394;&#x394;CT method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Livak and Schmittgen, 2001</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Plant growth-promoting traits of <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> and <italic>Serratia</italic> species</title>
<p>We investigated six bacterial strains with biological control activity, <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> SLU99, <italic>Serratia rubidaea</italic> EV23, AV10, <italic>Serratia plymuthica</italic> AS13, S412, and <italic>Serratia proteamaculans</italic> S4. To evaluate the growth promotion activity of these bacteria, potato plants grown in field conditions were subjected to treatment with these bacteria. Four out of the six tested strains, SLU99, EV23, AV10 and S412 resulted in significantly increased plant height, compared to the water treated control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of bacterial inoculations on the height of potato plants grown under field conditions. Strains used were <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> SLU99, <italic>Serratia rubidaea</italic> EV23 and AV10, <italic>S. plymuthica</italic> S412 and AS13, and <italic>S. proteamaculans</italic> S4. Asterisks indicated statistical significance (* p &lt; 0.001; Dunnett&#x2019;s test, n=40 plants).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1141692-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To examine the effectiveness of plant growth promotion, potato and tomato plants grown under greenhouse conditions were inoculated with the four selected strains. Inoculation with <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> SLU99 significantly increased plant height, total dry weight, and yield of tomato plants by 13.3%, 34.5%, and 183.9%, respectively, compared to non-inoculated plants. Meanwhile, <italic>S. rubidaea</italic> AV10-treated tomato plants had 12.3% greater total dry weight than non-inoculated plants. On the other hand, inoculation with <italic>S. rubidaea</italic> EV23 and <italic>S. plymuthica</italic> S412 had no significant effect on all morphological parameters tested on tomato plants (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A&#x2013;F</bold>
</xref>). Furthermore, inoculation with both SLU99 and EV23, individually, significantly increased potato plant height, yield, and total plant dry weight (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Inoculation with AV10 promoted plant growth as total plant dry weight but not plant height, and vice versa for S412 on potato. Nevertheless, all inoculated plants had significantly higher tuber yields compared to the controls. The highest increase in yield for potato was recorded for EV23 (15%) and SLU99 (13.7%), followed by AV10 and S412 treated plants with 11.3%, and 10.7%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Plant height at 30 and 60 days after transplanting, yield, and total dry weight of tomato and potato plants inoculated with <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> SLU99, <italic>Serratia rubidaea</italic> EV23, AV10, <italic>S. plymuthica</italic> S412 and control (mock inoculation) under greenhouse conditions.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Plant height at 30 DAT (cm)</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Plant height at 60 DAT (cm)</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Yield/plant (g)</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Total plant dry weight (g)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">Tomato</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Potato</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Tomato</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Potato</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Tomato</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Potato</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Tomato</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Potato</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>P. fluorescens</italic> SLU99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">70.50<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.80<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">149.0<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.8<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48.5<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>S. rubidaea</italic> EV23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.57<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66.12<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.0<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">150.7<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.6<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.8<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>S. rubidaea</italic> AV10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.90<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.81<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.7<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">145.8<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.3<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.2<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>S. plymuthica</italic> S412</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.77<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64.76<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.3<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">145.0<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.2<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.4<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.20<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.10<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.8<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">131.0<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33.3<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43.8<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>p</italic> value</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2420</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0709</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0131</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0005</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0103</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0152</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Means without a common letter (a, b, c) are significantly different by LSD test at 95% confidence level.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of bacteria inoculations on the phenotypic characteristics of tomato and potato plants. Dry weight of different tomato <bold>(A&#x2013;D)</bold> and potato <bold>(G&#x2013;J)</bold> plant parts, and tomato fruit <bold>(E)</bold>, potato tuber <bold>(K)</bold> and number of tomato and potato leaves <bold>(F, L)</bold> per plant. Yellow and green color bar plots represent measurements for tomato and potato, respectively. Means of root and stem dry weight were not significantly different among treatments. Strains used were <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> SLU99, <italic>Serratia rubidaea</italic> EV23 and AV10, <italic>S. plymuthica</italic> S412. Means within the same bar graph without a common letter are significantly different by LSD&#x2019;s test at 95% confidence level. Each value is the mean of nine and ten biological replicates per treatment for tomato and potato plants, respectively. Error bars represent standard deviations (SD).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1141692-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Plant height increased rapidly during the vegetative stage until fruit set (40 DAT), or until the start of tuber initiation (30 DAP) for tomato and potato plants, respectively, and was not significantly different among treatments. Thereafter, during the fruit growth stage (50-60 DAT), a significant effect of bacteria inoculation on tomato plant height was observed (P=0.0431 and P=0.0131 at 50 and 60 DAT, respectively) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, a 4.2% reduction in tomato plant height was observed when plants were treated with EV23 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Applications of SLU99 resulted in increased tomato leaf (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2E</bold>
</xref>) and fruit number (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2F</bold>
</xref>) compared to other treatments. Consequently, SLU99-treated tomato plants had 39.7% and 191.2% more leaf and fruit dry weights, respectively, compared to non-inoculated plants.</p>
<p>For potato plants at 30 DAP, swelling stolon tips were observed in all treatments suggesting tuber initiation had started. The effect of bacteria inoculation on potato plant height was only significant during the tuber bulking stage (40-60 DAP) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). In addition, all bacteria except S412 significantly increased tuber dry weight over control plants (P=0.0003) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2J</bold>
</xref>). However, the dry weight of other plant parts was not enhanced by bacteria treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2G&#x2013;I, K, L</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Relative chlorophyll content was significantly higher after SLU99 application in tomato (P=0.0188) and potato plants (P=0.0287) but was not elevated after EV23, AV10 and S412 treatments compared to the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative chlorophyll content of tomato <bold>(A)</bold> and potato <bold>(B)</bold> plants inoculated with rhizobacteria. The values presented are mean values of relative chlorophyll content in the unit of Chlorophyll Content Index (CCI) measured using an Apogee MC-100 Chlorophyll Concentration Meter at harvest. Each value is the mean of 90 readings from nine biological replicates for tomato and 100 readings from ten biological replicates for potato per treatment. Means within the same bar graph without a common letter are significantly different by LSD&#x2019;s test at 95% confidence level.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1141692-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Additionally, at harvest, inoculation with SLU99 resulted in 3.4% higher total nitrogen (TN) in the tomato grown soil, while&#xa0;inoculation of EV23, AV10 and S412 resulted in 10.7%, 7.7% and 24.3% lower TN over control treatment, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The elements P and K were slightly increased in tomato grown soil after SLU99 treatment, whereas EC and SOM were decreased. In potato grown soil, all bacterial treatments increased available K over the control by 22.2%-66.7%. TN in potato grown soil decreased in a small range after SLU99, EV23 and AV10 treatments (2.1%-6.2%). Meanwhile, the available P, pH, EC, and SOM at harvest of soils grown with potato were not affected by bacteria treatments (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). In summary, inoculation of SLU99 significantly promoted the growth of tomato and potato plants, and EV23 promoted the growth of potato plants grown in a controlled environment as reflected by high chlorophyll content, total plant biomass and yield.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Effects of rhizobacteria inoculation on growth of <italic>in vitro</italic> grown tomato and potato plants</title>
<p>To gain insights into the mechanisms behind growth promotion, tomato and potato plants were grown in MS media supplemented with the sterile-filtered bacterial culture supernatant. When compared to the mock treatment, tomato seeds grown in the&#xa0;SLU99-supernatant supplemented media showed a higher germination rate, increased root growth and shoot height, and enhanced number of lateral roots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A, B</bold>
</xref>). Potato explants grown in the media supplemented with SLU99 supernatant resulted in increased shoot height by 24.6% (<italic>p</italic> = 0.02) compared to the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4C, D</bold>
</xref>). SLU99 treatment also increased root growth and resulted in the formation of adventitious roots and secondary adventitious roots (SAR), which emerge from aerial parts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> SLU99 on plants grown <italic>in vitro</italic>. Growth of tomato seedlings upon treatment with culture supernatant of SLU99 <bold>(B)</bold> compared to mock treatment <bold>(A)</bold>. Growth of potato plants treated with <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> SLU99 <bold>(D)</bold> compared to control treatment <bold>(C)</bold>. Arrows indicate secondary adventitious roots developed upon treatment with SLU99. Insets in <bold>(C, D)</bold> are representative stereo microscope images at root induction. The scale bar in the inset images represents 1 mm.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1141692-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis</title>
<p>To gain insights into the mechanisms of SLU99-mediated growth promotion in tomato and potato plants, RNA extracted from the roots and leaves grown in the media supplemented with the supernatant of SLU99 was subjected to transcriptome profiling. A total of 1193 and 2226 genes were differentially expressed (log2FC &gt;1.5, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) in the roots of tomato and potato, respectively, compared to the control samples (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>; q-value or padj value information can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Excel files 1&#x2013;4</bold>
</xref>). Among them, 1076 and 996 genes were upregulated, and 117 and 1230 genes were downregulated in the respective samples (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5A, B</bold>
</xref>). In tomato leaves, a total of 1732 DEGs were detected (log2FC &gt;1.5, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) with 1322 genes upregulated and 410 genes downregulated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold>
</xref>). For potato leaves, we identified 959 (log2FC &gt;1.5, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) when treated with SLU99 compared to the control samples. Of the identified DEGs, 206 were upregulated, and 753 genes were downregulated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Characteristics of the DEGs in tomato and potato plants treated with <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> SLU99 culture supernatant.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">
</th>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="2" align="center">Tomato</th>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="2" align="center">Potato</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">
</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Root</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Leaf</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Root</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Leaf</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Upregulated</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1675</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2024</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1787</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">411</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Log2FC &gt; 1.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1094</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1467</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1012</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">209</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">p value &lt; 0.05</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1076</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1322</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">996</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Downregulated</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">319</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">841</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2253</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Log2FC &lt; 1.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">118</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">420</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1251</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">772</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">p value &lt; 0.05</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">117</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">410</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1230</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">753</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for tomato and potato roots <bold>(A, B)</bold> and leaves <bold>(C, D)</bold> treated with the culture supernatant of <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> SLU99, compared to the mock treatment. Upregulated genes are shown as blue dots at the right side of each plot; downregulated genes are shown as pink dots at the left side of each plot; non-differentially expressed genes are shown as green dots clustered at the centre (centred around Log2FC 0) of each plot.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1141692-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>We performed KEGG pathway enrichment analysis to gain a better understanding of the functional categories of the DEGs in response to the PGPR culture supernatant treatment. In the treated root samples, a total of 300 and 753 genes were grouped into enriched pathways in tomato and potato, respectively, and a total of 382 and 259 genes were grouped into enriched pathways in the treated leaves of tomato and potato, respectively. Treatment resulted in enrichment for genes involved in plant hormone signal transduction pathway (37 and 33 genes, respectively), zeatin biosynthesis (15 and 13 genes), plant-pathogen interactions (37 and 25 genes) and MAPK signaling pathway (30 and 19 genes) in both tomato and potato leaves. Additionally, a total of 40, 76, 44 and 25 genes related to the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway were enriched in the roots and leaves of tomato and potato upon treatment with SLU99 culture supernatant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs in the transcriptomes of tomato and potato roots <bold>(A, B)</bold> and leaves <bold>(C, D)</bold> treated with the culture supernatant of <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> SLU99, compared to the mock treatment. The size of the circles in each plot represents the number of DEGs annotated for that pathway or process. The gene ratio on the x-axis represents the ratio of the count of core enriched genes to the count of pathway genes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1141692-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To compare the effects of the tomato and potato samples, we examined the overlap of the DEG products among the roots and leaves. The analysis showed an overlap of 164 gene products in the root samples, and 95 in the leaf samples upon SLU99 treatment in potato and tomato plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7A, B</bold>
</xref>). Within the species, there was an overlap of 515 gene products between root and leaf samples of tomato, while 265 similar gene products were responsive in the root and leaf samples of potato (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7C, D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>The overlap of products of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in tomato and potato roots <bold>(A)</bold> and leaves <bold>(B)</bold>, root and leaf samples of tomato <bold>(C)</bold> and potato <bold>(D)</bold> after treatments with <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> SLU99 supernatant.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1141692-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>SLU99 regulates phytohormonal biosynthesis and signal transduction pathways</title>
<p>One of the major objectives of this study was to elucidate the changes in the host transcriptomes that are important for PGP activity. Phytohormones, as a result of their complex interaction and crosstalk, regulate various cellular processes involved in plant growth and development. The gibberellins (GAs) play an important role in several developmental processes including seed germination. Upon SLU99 treatment in tomato root, <italic>gibberellin 3-beta-dioxygenase 1</italic>-like (<italic>GA3OX1</italic>), a gene involved in the biosynthesis of GA was upregulated (log2FC 1.9, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05). On the other hand, in tomato leaves, <italic>gibberellin 2-beta-dioxygenase 8</italic> (<italic>GA2ox8</italic>), a gene involved in the deactivation of GA, was upregulated (log2FC 1.6, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f8" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Heatmap of key differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in different phytohormonal pathways upon treatment with <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> SLU99 culture supernatant. GA, gibberellic acid; CK, cytokinin. Asterisks indicated statistical significance (*p &lt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1141692-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The hormones auxin and CK are major players in the regulation of signaling pathways underlying plant growth and development. In tomato, <italic>tryptophan synthase beta subunit 1</italic> (<italic>TSB1</italic>)-like, responsible for increased in tryptophan biosynthesis, and <italic>YUCCA8</italic>, responsible for the last enzymatic step from indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPA) to IAA were upregulated 16 and 3-fold (log2FC 4 and 1.6) in leaf and root samples, respectively. Additionally, in potato roots, SLU99 treatment resulted in increased expression (log2FC 3.3) of <italic>L-tryptophan-pyruvate aminotransferase 1 (TAA1)-</italic>like, which encodes an enzyme that converts L-tryptophan to IPA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The activation of auxin biosynthesis genes and production of IAA by SLU99 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Kelbessa et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) prompted us to analyze the differences in the expression of genes involved in auxin signaling pathways. Major auxin-responsive genes such as <italic>Gretchen Hagen 3</italic> (<italic>GH3</italic>) and <italic>small auxin up RNA</italic> (<italic>SAUR</italic>) are transcriptionally regulated by auxin at early stages of signal transduction. Following treatment with SLU99 culture supernatant, expression of the <italic>IAA-amido synthetase GH3.1 (GH3.1)</italic>, important for maintaining auxin homeostasis increased significantly (log2FC 6.8, 4.6 and 1.6 in tomato root, tomato leaf and potato root, respectively) in comparison to the mock treatment. Within the SAUR family, five and seven genes were differentially expressed in the tomato and potato plants, respectively. Additionally, <italic>PIN2</italic>, a root-specific auxin transporter and <italic>PIN8</italic>, a constitutively active&#xa0;auxin transporter were also upregulated in the potato plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The gene encoding CK hydroxylase, an enzyme that catalyzes the biosynthesis of trans-zeatin (tZ), a biologically active CK, was strongly upregulated (log2FC 7.5) upon treatment with SLU99 in tomato roots. On the other hand, in tomato leaf <italic>CK dehydroxygenase 3</italic> (<italic>CKX3</italic>), involved in the degradation of CK was upregulated 4-fold (log2FC 2) compared to the mock treatment. Furthermore, <italic>zeatin O-glycosyltransferase</italic> (<italic>ZOG1</italic>) and <italic>zeatin O-xylosyltransferase</italic> (<italic>ZOX1</italic>) were upregulated in tomato leaves (log2FC 5.4 and 3.5), while only <italic>ZOG1</italic> was upregulated in the tomato and potato roots (log2FC 2.1 and 1.6). <italic>ZOG1</italic> and <italic>ZOX1</italic> are involved in the conversion of tZ to a stable and reversible O-glycosylzeatin and O-xylosylzeatin, respectively.</p>
<p>The PGP activity of bacteria is also attributed to the changes in the plant hormone ethylene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Poupin et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Since SLU99 displayed ACC deaminase activity, we examined changes in the expression of genes encoding the enzymes of the ethylene biosynthesis pathway. <italic>1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate_synthase-</italic>like (<italic>ACS</italic>) involved in the synthesis of ACC, a direct precursor of ethylene, and <italic>1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate_oxidase</italic> (<italic>ACO</italic>) subsequently oxidizes ACC to ethylene. In tomato, <italic>ACS</italic> and <italic>ACO1</italic> were upregulated in roots (Log2FC 5.1 and 1.8, respectively), while <italic>ACO1</italic> and <italic>ACO4</italic> were upregulated in leaves (Log2FC 3.2 and 2.6, respectively). In potato, <italic>ACS2</italic> was upregulated in roots (log2FC 4.1), while <italic>ACS4</italic> was upregulated in leaves (log2FC 2.2). <italic>ACO</italic> homologs were upregulated both in the roots and leaves (log2FC 2.9 and 1.7, respectively), while <italic>ACO1, ACO5</italic> and <italic>ACO11</italic> were upregulated in leaves (log2FC 2.1, 2.1 and 3.3, respectively). Lysine histidine transporters (LHT) are associated with the transportation of ACC. When treated with SLU99 supernatant, <italic>LHT8</italic> was upregulated in both tomato and potato roots and tomato leaves by 3.6, 2.5 and 2.5-fold (log2FC), respectively, while <italic>LHT1</italic> was upregulated only in tomato leaves (log2FC 1.6). To validate the observed gene expression differences in the NGS data we employed RT-qPCR. We analyzed three key genes involved in the ethylene pathway, <italic>SlACS</italic>, <italic>SlACO1</italic>, and <italic>SlLHT8</italic> that showed increased gene expression following SLU99 treatment (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), in agreement with the findings from RNA-seq. Taken together, these results indicate that treatment with the culture supernatant from SLU99 stimulates the accumulation of phytohormones auxin, CK and ethylene.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Reprogramming of host transcriptional networks</title>
<p>The discovery of several DEGs involved in signal transduction pathways in response to SLU99 treatment suggests strong regulation of host transcription factor networks. To investigate the interaction of SLU99 with the plant transcriptional network, DEGs encoding TFs were identified and assigned to families using the plant transcription factor database. In total, DEGs belonging to 24 different TF families were identified with the greatest number of DEGs identified in the root samples compared to the leaf samples (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). In the tomato and potato roots, a total of 112 and 182 TF encoding DEGs were found, whereas 62 to 92 DEGs were found in leaf samples, implying significant reprogramming of the host transcriptional network. The HD-ZIP TF genes were exclusively upregulated in tomato plants (11 upregulated and 2 downregulated), while 14 HD-ZIPs were downregulated in potato. Notably, the strongest upregulation was found for <italic>ATHB12</italic> (log2FC 9.6) followed by <italic>ATHB40-like</italic> (log2FC 6.4), and <italic>ATHB7-like</italic> (log2FC 3.4) in tomato leaves. <italic>ATHB12</italic> and <italic>ATHB7</italic>, considered paralogs, belong to the class-I HD-ZIP TF family and were also upregulated in root samples (log2FC 2.1 and 2.0, respectively). <italic>ATHB40</italic>, on the other hand, is a class-II HD-ZIP TF that was upregulated in the root (log2FC 3.7). <italic>ATHB12</italic> and <italic>ATHB7</italic> are associated with root elongation and leaf development, albeit at different stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">R&#xe9; et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Hur et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). <italic>ATHB40</italic> is a negative regulator of primary root development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Mora et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition to the PGP-related TF encoding DEGs, we also&#xa0;identified several DEGs encoding TFs involved in defence-related pathways, namely, WRKY, MYB, MYC, HSF, and NAC TFs.&#xa0;WRKY TFs are global regulators of host responses to phytopathogens. Treatment with SLU99 culture supernatant triggered differential expression of 14 WRKY genes in tomato and 11 genes in potato. Two of the WRKY TF encoding genes, <italic>WRKY30</italic> and <italic>WRKY45</italic>, involved in defence against biotic and abiotic stresses, were upregulated in common between tomato and potato. <italic>WRKY6, WRKY55</italic>, and <italic>WRKY71</italic> were uniquely upregulated in tomato leaf and, along with <italic>WRKY33B</italic> and <italic>WRKY75</italic>, are involved in defence against necrotrophic fungal pathogens. <italic>WRKY40</italic> and <italic>WRKY41</italic>, genes involved in abiotic stress tolerance, were strongly upregulated in tomato leaves (log2FC 9.0 and 4.5, respectively), and were downregulated in potato leaves upon SLU99 treatment (log2FC -2.1 to -2.7). The <italic>MYC2</italic> TF upregulated (log2FC 5.1) in tomato roots upon SLU99 treatment indicates a role in JA-mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR). Furthermore, treatment with SLU99 induced expression of several R-gene orthologs such as <italic>Cf-2,2-like</italic> (log2FC 2.2)<italic>, Cf-9</italic> (log2FC 3.4)<italic>, RPM1</italic> (log2FC 1.7)<italic>, RPS5</italic> (log2FC 4.1), <italic>CSA1</italic> (log2FC 4.8) and <italic>Alternaria stem canker resistance</italic> (log2FC 1.6) in tomato leaves, <italic>LEAF RUST 10 DISEASE-RESISTANCE LOCUS RECEPTOR-LIKE PROTEIN KINASE-like 1.1</italic> (<italic>LRK10</italic>) (log2FC 2.9 and 5.3 in root and leaf, respectively), <italic>TMV resistance protein N</italic> gene (log2FC 6.0) in tomato root and <italic>putative late blight resistance protein homolog R1A-10</italic> (log2FC 1.6) and <italic>R1A-3</italic> (log2FC 1.5) in potato leaves.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Several soilborne rhizobacteria have long been known to promote plant growth across a wide range of plant species. In this study, six bacterial strains were chosen for their biocontrol potential and tested on potato plants in a late-blight hotspot field. Four of the strains that directly impacted the height of the potato plant in the field were chosen for detailed examination in a controlled environment to further evaluate their growth-promoting function. These strains included <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> strain SLU99, <italic>S. rubidaea</italic> strains EV23 and AV10, and <italic>S. plymuthica</italic> S412.</p>
<p>In the growth chamber, all four strains enhanced at least two growth variables in potato plants, indicating that all tested strains significantly impact potato growth, which is consistent with the field evaluation. However, the effect of these strains on the dry matter accumulation is only noticeable in the tuber, which accounts for more than 60% of the total dry weight, suggesting that PGPR treatment promotes photosynthate translocation into tubers. In contrast, growth-promotion activity in tomato plants is strain-dependent with SLU99 and AV10 improving plant height and total dry weight. Furthermore, SLU99 improved chlorophyll content, total leaf number and leaf area, suggesting enhanced light interception and photosynthesis rate explaining the obtained higher tomato fruit yield.</p>
<p>Intriguingly, although all four strains are favorable to potato yield, only SLU99 is significantly beneficial to tomato yield. Previous research found that bacterial consortiums aid plant growth by enhancing stress tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Silambarasan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Kelbessa et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Recently, results from our group demonstrated that SLU99 is compatible with strains EV23 and AV10 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Kelbessa et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), implying that these bacteria could co-exist as a consortium in the rhizosphere. Considering that all these strains are potent biocontrol agents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Kelbessa et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), a bacterial consortium of these strains could act synergistically to contribute to reducing disease under natural conditions. Moreover, plant exudates attract rhizobacteria to colonize the roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bais et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). It has been demonstrated that the composition of root exudates varies between cultivars of the same species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) and thus cultivar-specific traits might have contributed to a negative regulatory effect of the colonization of <italic>Serratia</italic> species in the tomato variety used in this study.</p>
<p>PGPR also enhance the mobilization of locally available nutrients for plant uptake by solubilizing P, K, and Zn, and nitrogen fixation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Prasanna et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). N and K are the most abundant nutrients in plant tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Sardans and Pe&#xf1;uelas, 2015</xref>). Potato cultivation takes up K in large quantities and is very important to gain a higher yield of marketable tubers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Khan et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Our results suggest increased K in the soil following the treatment with PGPR, consistent with a previous study that showed <italic>Enterobacter cloacae</italic>, a PGPR, led to a higher amount of K in the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ghadam Khani et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). However, further research validation is required to assess the impact of PGPR on soil nutrient contents. On the other hand, in tomato, TN, available P and K were slightly increased after SLU99 treatments, indicating that this strain may have facilitated nutrient availability for plant uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Meena et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Phytohormone-mediated signal transduction and their interplay regulate several physiological processes in plant growth and development. Phytohormones also mediate cellular responses during abiotic and biotic stress. Rhizobacterial-stimulated plant growth is intrinsically linked to the production of phytohormones, siderophores, and secretion of ACC-deaminase that reduces ethylene biosynthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). Accordingly, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis suggested that treatment with SLU99 culture supernatant resulted in significant differential expression of genes involved in plant hormone signal transduction. Genes involved in the biosynthesis of zeatin, a naturally occurring CK that promotes cell division in plants, were significantly differentially expressed in both potato and tomato leaves upon SLU99 treatment. Strain SLU99 enhanced the expression of <italic>CK hydroxylase</italic> in tomato root suggesting an increase in the biosynthesis of trans-zeatin, which is reported to be transported through the xylem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Osugi et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). However, excess CK needs to be stored to be protected against CK oxidases. Conversion of zeatin to O-glucosyl- and O-xylosyl-zeatin, a reversible process, is important for the storage of CK. Upregulation of <italic>ZOG1</italic> and <italic>ZOX1</italic> genes in the current study suggests the CK is synthesized in excess and is stored in roots and leaves, upon SLU99 treatment in tomato.</p>
<p>The increase in the germination of the tomato seeds requires specific reprogramming of the GA pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Groot and Karssen, 1987</xref>). Moreover, the presence of GA in the root meristem and elongation zone is necessary for the normal growth of the root. <italic>GA3OX</italic> encodes a key enzyme involved in the last step in the biosynthesis of the GA and is reported to be expressed in the root elongation zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Barker et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). SLU99 culture supernatant treatment of tomato plants resulted in an increased expression level of <italic>GA3OX</italic>, suggesting an increase in the GA in the roots. GA homeostasis is necessary for plant growth and development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Richards et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). GA 2-oxidation mediated by the <italic>GA2ox</italic> gene family is reported to be a major GA inactivation pathway that functions throughout <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Schomburg et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Rieu et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>) and is necessary for maintaining GA levels in peach (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cheng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Upregulation of <italic>GA2ox8</italic> in tomato leaves suggests PGPR aid in maintaining GA levels. Our results of increased expression of genes encoding DELLA-GAI and a slight increase of AP2/ERF in tomato leaves are in line with reports showing lowered GA levels are also associated with improved stress tolerance through DELLA-mediated activation of AP2/ERF (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Colebrook et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Castro-Camba et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>It is well-established that several auxin-producing PGPR regulate auxin localization and distribution in the plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Tsukanova et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Rhizobacterial-produced auxin has also been shown to be important for PGPR-mediated morphological changes in plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Spaepen et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Treatment with these PGPR also resulted in increased levels of endogenous auxin and is associated with root growth. Indeed, local auxin maxima in the pericycle is necessary for the formation of lateral root primordia and their subsequent development into lateral roots. However, the effect of exogenous auxin on the root is concentration dependent. At higher concentrations, exogenous auxin inhibits root growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Ivanchenko et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Consequently, large amounts of auxin generated by some rhizobacteria strains, such as <italic>Enterobacter</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Park et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>)<italic>, P. fluorescens</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Zamioudis et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>) and <italic>P. syringae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Loper and Schroth, 1986</xref>) inhibit primary root elongation in lettuce, <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>, and sugar beet, respectively. In short, while auxin is an important contributing factor to root growth, regulating endogenous auxin levels is also crucial. <italic>GH3</italic> genes, upon induction by IAA accumulation, encode enzymes involved in the conjugation of free IAA to amino acids thereby maintaining auxin homeostasis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Staswick et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). Our study is consistent with earlier reports of <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> producing auxin and with increased lateral root formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ortiz-Castro et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Additionally, treatment with SLU99 also impaired primary root elongation in potato plants. Taken together, our results support the hypothesis that treatment with SLU99, while increasing the endogenous IAA levels through upregulation of <italic>YUCCA8</italic>, and utilizing necessary auxin for lateral root development, also aided in maintaining its homeostasis through GH3.1 mediated conjugation of free auxin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f9" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;9</label>
<caption>
<p>A proposed model illustrating the effect of <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> strain SLU99 on different phytohormonal pathways in tomato <bold>(A)</bold> and potato <bold>(B)</bold> plants.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1141692-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Higher auxin levels are also associated with increased ethylene biosynthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Fa Yang and Hoffman, 1984</xref>). Regulating cellular ethylene content is a critical aspect of plant growth and development. Application of exogenous auxin is also reported to increase expression of <italic>ACS</italic> genes that encode enzymes involved in the conversion of <italic>S</italic>-adenosylmethionine to ACC, the ethylene precursor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Tsuchisaka and Theologis, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Niu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Considering that PGPR produce auxin, it can be hypothesized that the auxin produced by PGPR result in increased expression of <italic>ACS</italic>, and thus might promote ACC production. Providing further evidence of ethylene synthesis, <italic>ACO1</italic>, which encodes ACC oxidase, the enzyme required for the synthesis of ethylene from ACC, is also upregulated upon SLU99 treatment. However, higher ethylene levels not only inhibit root development but also trigger an adaptive response such as growth inhibition and delayed flowering (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Ravanbakhsh et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). PGPR belonging to diverse genera are reported to produce ACC deaminase, an enzyme that lowers host ACC levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Glick, 2005</xref>). It is important to note that although bacteria produce ACC deaminase, due to the higher substrate affinity of ACC oxidase than ACC deaminase, the ethylene level in the plant cannot be totally eliminated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Glick et&#xa0;al., 1998</xref>). Intriguingly, two differentially expressed genes, <italic>LHT8</italic> and <italic>LHT1</italic>, belonging to the lysine histidine transporter family that was previously linked to ACC transport (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Shin et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Vanderstraeten and van der Straeten, 2017</xref>) are upregulated in treated roots and leaves, respectively, suggesting that the excess ACC may be transported to the shoot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9</bold>
</xref>). Further research using ethylene biosynthetic and signaling mutants is necessary to enhance our understanding of the involvement of PGPR in modulating ethylene levels during plant development.</p>
<p>Plant hormone homeostasis is critical in plant growth and development. Since PGPR can have a significant influence on hormone biosynthesis and signaling, plants need to cope with such differences. Upregulation of <italic>CKX3</italic>, <italic>GA2OX</italic>, and <italic>GH3</italic> in PGPR-treated plants in our study might thus be an adaptation mechanism to increased hormone levels.</p>
<p>All of the rhizobacteria strains tested here have previously been shown to have biocontrol activity against the plant pathogen <italic>Phytophthora colocasiae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Kelbessa et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), both in culture and <italic>in planta</italic>. The activation of plant metabolite pathways (growth and defence) by the rhizobacteria, and their direct antagonistic activity against pathogens, suggests that these strains will have utility in sustainable agriculture by controlling serious crop diseases and boosting yield.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: Bioproject <uri xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/851815">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/851815</uri>, accession <uri xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/</uri>, SAMN29251990, SAMN29251991, SAMN29251992, SAMN29251993.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>Conceptualization and designing the experiment: PK and RV. Methodology: NH, FG, RV, and PK. Data validation and analysis: NH, FG, SG, RV, and PK. Investigation: NH, PK, and FG. Resources: RV, RO, and PK. Writing - original draft preparation: NH and PK. Writing - review and editing: NH, RV, SW, SG, RO, and PK. Supervision and project administration: PK, RV, SW, and RO. Funding acquisition: PK, RV, and RO. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research work was supported by FORMAS (2019-01316) and the Swedish Research Council (2019&#x2013;04270), Novo Nordisk Fonden (0074727), Carl Tryggers Stiftelse (CTS 20:464), SLU&#x2019;s Centre for Biological Control and Partneskap Alnarp (PA1365-2021). SW acknowledges funding from the Scottish Government Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS) Division.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1141692/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1141692/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.xlsx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.xlsx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_3.xlsx" id="SM3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_4.xlsx" id="SM4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.pdf" id="SF1" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abdelfattah</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tack</surname> <given-names>A. J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wasserman</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Norelli</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Evidence for host&#x2013;microbiome co-evolution in apple</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>234</volume>, <fpage>2088</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2100</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/NPH.17820</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sabri</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ljung</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hasnain</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Auxin production by plant associated bacteria: impact on endogenous IAA content and growth of triticum aestivum l</article-title>. <source>Lett. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>542</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>547</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/J.1472-765X.2009.02565.X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Amna</surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Din</surname> <given-names>B. U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarfraz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kamran</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Javed</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Mechanistic elucidation of germination potential and growth of wheat inoculated with exopolysaccharide and ACC- deaminase producing bacillus strains under induced salinity stress</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.</source> <volume>183</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.ECOENV.2019.109466</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Anzalone</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Di Guardo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bella</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghadamgahi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dimaria</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zago</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Bioprospecting of beneficial bacteria traits associated with tomato root in greenhouse environment reveals that sampling sites impact more than the root compartment</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.637582</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bais</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weir</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perry</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gilroy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vivanco</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>266</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/ANNUREV.ARPLANT.57.032905.105159</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bal</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chanway</surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christopher</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Evidence of nitrogen fixation in lodgepole pine inoculated with diazotrophic paenibacillus polymyxa</article-title>. <source>Botany</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>891</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>896</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b2012-044</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barker</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernandez Garcia</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Powers</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vaughan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bennett</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Mapping sites of gibberellin biosynthesis in the arabidopsis root tip</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>229</volume>, <fpage>1521</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1534</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.16967</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Besserer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Puech-Pag&#xe8;s</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kiefer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomez-Roldan</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jauneau</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Strigolactones stimulate arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by activating mitochondria</article-title>. <source>PloS Biol.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>1239</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1247</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.0040226</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Burkhead</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schisler</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Slininger</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Pyrrolnitrin production by biological control agent pseudomonas cepacia B37w in culture and in colonized wounds of potatoes</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <elocation-id>2031</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.60.6.2031-2039.1994</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bushnell</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rood</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singer</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>BBMerge - accurate paired shotgun read merging <italic>via</italic> overlap</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0185056</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Castro-Camba</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xe1;nchez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vidal</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vielba</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Interactions of gibberellins with phytohormones and their role in stress responses</article-title>. <source>Horticulturae</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>241</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae8030241</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Functional analysis of the gibberellin 2-oxidase gene family in peach</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.619158</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>T. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bui</surname> <given-names>L. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoang</surname> <given-names>M. T. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Pseudomonas PS01 isolated from maize rhizosphere alters root system architecture and promotes plant growth</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>471</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms8040471</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Colebrook</surname> <given-names>E. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hedden</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davies</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dow</surname> <given-names>J. A. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The role of gibberellin signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Biol.</source> <volume>217</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/JEB.089938</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Compant</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duffy</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nowak</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cl&#xe9;ment</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barka</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>4951</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4959</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.71.9.4951-4959.2005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Delaux</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schornack</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Plant evolution driven by interactions with symbiotic and pathogenic microbes</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>371</volume>, <elocation-id>eaba6605</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/SCIENCE.ABA6605</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Devi</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khatri</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Subramanian</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Draft genome sequence of a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, serratia fonticola strain AU-P3(3)</article-title>. <source>Genome Announc.</source> <volume>1</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <elocation-id>e00946-13</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/GENOMEA.00946-13</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Weert</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vermeiren</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mulders</surname> <given-names>I. H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuiper</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hendrickx</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bloemberg</surname> <given-names>G. V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Flagella-driven chemotaxis towards exudate components is an important trait for tomato root colonization by pseudomonas fluorescens</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1180</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.11.1173</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Diagne</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ndour</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Djighaly</surname> <given-names>P. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngom</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngom</surname> <given-names>M. C. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ndong</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on salt stress tolerance of casuarina obesa (Miq.)</article-title>. <source>Front. Sustain. Food Syst.</source> <volume>4</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/FSUFS.2020.601004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dobin</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schlesinger</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Drenkow</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zaleski</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jha</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTS635</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dodd</surname> <given-names>I. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zinovkina</surname> <given-names>N. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Safronova</surname> <given-names>V. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Belimov</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Rhizobacterial mediation of plant hormone status</article-title>. <source>Ann. Appl. Biol.</source> <volume>157</volume>, <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>379</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/J.1744-7348.2010.00439.X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Drigo</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pijl</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duyts</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kielak</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gamper</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Houtekamer</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Shifting carbon flow from roots into associated microbial communities in response to elevated atmospheric CO2</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>10938</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10942</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/PNAS.0912421107/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.200912421SI.PDF</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Promotion of plant growth, biological control and induced systemic resistance in maize by pseudomonas aurantiaca JD37</article-title>. <source>Ann. Microbiol.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>1177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1185</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13213-012-0576-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fa Yang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoffman</surname> <given-names>N. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants</article-title>. <source>Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>189</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.001103</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghadamgahi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tarighi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taheri</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saripella</surname> <given-names>G. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anzalone</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kalyandurg</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Plant growth-promoting activity of pseudomonas aeruginosa FG106 and its ability to act as a biocontrol agent against potato, tomato and taro pathogens</article-title>. <source>Biology</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>140</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biology11010140</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghadam Khani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Enayatizamir</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Norouzi Masir</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Impact of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on different forms of soil potassium under wheat cultivation</article-title>. <source>Lett. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>514</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>521</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/lam.13132</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Glick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Modulation of plant ethylene levels by the bacterial enzyme ACC deaminase</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</source> <volume>251</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.FEMSLE.2005.07.030</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Glick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobson</surname> <given-names>C. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwarze</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pasternak</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase mutants of the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium pseudomonas putida GR12-2 do not stimulate canola root elongation</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>911</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>915</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/M94-146</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Glick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Penrose</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria</article-title>. <source>J. Theor. Biol.</source> <volume>190</volume>, <fpage>63</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jtbi.1997.0532</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Groot</surname> <given-names>S. P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karssen</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Gibberellins regulate seed germination in tomato by endosperm weakening: a study with gibberellin-deficient mutants</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>171</volume>, <fpage>525</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>531</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hardoim</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Overbeek</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Elsas</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth</article-title>. <source>Trends Microbiol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>463</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>471</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hur</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Um</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Arabidopsis thaliana homeobox 12 (ATHB12), a homeodomain-leucine zipper protein, regulates leaf growth by promoting cell expansion and endoreduplication</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>205</volume>, <fpage>316</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>328</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/NPH.12998</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ito</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Application of ggplot2 to pharmacometric graphics</article-title>. <source>CPT pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>e79</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/PSP.2013.56</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ivanchenko</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Napsucialy-Mendivil</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dubrovsky</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Auxin-induced inhibition of lateral root initiation contributes to root system shaping in arabidopsis thaliana</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>740</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>752</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/J.1365-313X.2010.04365.X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kelbessa</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dubey</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Catara</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghadamgahi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ortiz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vetukuri</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Potential of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to improve crop productivity and adaptation to a changing climate</article-title>. <source>CABI Reviews</source> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/cabireviews.2023.0001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kelbessa</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghadamgahi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhattacharjee</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vetukuri</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Antagonistic and plant growth promotion of rhizobacteria against phytophthora colocasiae in taro</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>1</elocation-id>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.1035549</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>M. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akhtar</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahmood-ul-Hassan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahmood</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Safdar</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Potato tuber yield and quality as affected by rates and sources of potassium fertilizer</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>664</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>677</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01904167.2012.653072</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Koo</surname> <given-names>S.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>K.-S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization of a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, serratia sp. SY5</article-title>. <source>J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>1431</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1438</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mallick</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Solanki</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Solanki</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hora</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): modern prospects for sustainable agriculture</article-title>. <source>Plant Heal. Under Biot. Stress</source>, <fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>127</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-981-13-6040-4_6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Leaf positions of potato suitable for determination of nitrogen content with a SPAD meter</article-title>. <source>Plant Prod. Sci.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>317</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>322</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1626/pps.15.317</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smyth</surname> <given-names>G. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>923</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>930</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTT656</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Transcriptome profiles reveal the growth-promoting mechanisms of paenibacillus polymyxa YC0136 on tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum l.)</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.584174</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Livak</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmittgen</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2&#x2013;&#x394;&#x394;CT method</article-title>. <source>Methods</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>408</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Loper</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Role of fluorescent siderophore production in biological control of pythium ultimum by a pseudomonas fluorescens strain</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>78</volume>, <elocation-id>166</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-78-166</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Loper</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Henkels</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Utilization of heterologous siderophores enhances levels of iron available to pseudomonas putida in the rhizosphere</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>5357</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5363</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.65.12.5357-5363.1999</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Loper</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schroth</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Influence of bacterial sources of indole-3-acetic acid on root elongation of sugar beet</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>386</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>389</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/Phyto-76-386</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Love</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anders</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>550</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/S13059-014-0550-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mahdi</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hafidi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allaoui</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biskri</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Halotolerant endophytic bacterium serratia rubidaea ED1 enhances phosphate solubilization and promotes seed germination</article-title>. <source>Agric.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>224</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/AGRICULTURE11030224</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Matsuda</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ozawa</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fujiwara</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Leaf photosynthesis, plant growth, and carbohydrate accumulation of tomato under different photoperiods and diurnal temperature differences</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <fpage>150</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>158</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2014.03.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McMillan</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zebell</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ristaino</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuehn</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Protective plant immune responses are elicited by bacterial outer membrane vesicles</article-title>. <source>Cell Rep.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <elocation-id>108645</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.CELREP.2020.108645</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Meena</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maurya</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Does a rhizospheric microorganism enhance k+ availability in agricultural soils</article-title>? <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>169</volume>, <fpage>337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>347</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.MICRES.2013.09.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mercado-Blanco</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>P. A. H. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Interactions between plants and beneficial pseudomonas spp.: exploiting bacterial traits for crop protection</article-title>. <source>Antonie van Leeuwenhoek</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>367</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>389</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/S10482-007-9167-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mora</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perotti</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez-Grand&#xed;o</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ribone</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cubas</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>AtHB40 modulates primary root length and gravitropism involving CYCLINB and auxin transporters</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>324</volume>, <elocation-id>111421</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.PLANTSCI.2022.111421</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Exogenous auxin-induced ENHANCER OF SHOOT REGENERATION 2 (ESR2) enhances femaleness of cucumber by activating the CsACS2 gene</article-title>. <source>Hortic. Res.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>uhab085</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/HR/UHAB085</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Olanrewaju</surname> <given-names>O. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Babalola</surname> <given-names>O. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting bacteria</article-title>. <source>World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11274-017-2364-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ortiz-Castro</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campos-Garc&#xed;a</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xf3;pez-Bucio</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Pseudomonas putida and pseudomonas fluorescens influence arabidopsis root system architecture through an auxin response mediated by bioactive cyclodipeptides</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Growth Regul.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>254</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>265</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00344-019-09979-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Osugi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kojima</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takebayashi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ueda</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kiba</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sakakibara</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Systemic transport of trans-zeatin and its precursor have differing roles in arabidopsis shoots</article-title>. <source>Nat. Plants</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nplants.2017.112</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Radhakrishnan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>I. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>IAA producing enterobacter sp. I-3 as a potent bio-herbicide candidate for weed control: a special reference with lettuce growth inhibition</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>212</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/S12088-015-0515-Y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Poupin</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greve</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carmona</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pinedo</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A complex molecular interplay of auxin and ethylene signaling pathways is involved in arabidopsis growth promotion by burkholderia phytofirmans</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <elocation-id>492</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00492</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prasanna</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nain</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rana</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shivay</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biofortification with microorganisms: present status and future challenges</article-title>. <source>Biofortification Food Crop</source>, <fpage>249</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>262</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-81-322-2716-8_19</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>P&#x159;ikryl</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van&#x10d;ura</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wurst</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Auxin formation by rhizosphere bacteria as a factor of root growth</article-title>. <source>Biol. Plant</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02902155</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ravanbakhsh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sasidharan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Voesenek</surname> <given-names>L. A. C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kowalchuk</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jousset</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Microbial modulation of plant ethylene signaling: ecological and evolutionary consequences</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>52</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-018-0436-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>R&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Capella</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonaventure</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Arabidopsis AtHB7 and AtHB12 evolved divergently to fine tune processes associated with growth and responses to water stress</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2229-14-150</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>King</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ait-ali</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harberd</surname> <given-names>N. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>HOW GIBBERELLIN REGULATES PLANT GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT: a molecular genetic analysis of gibberellin signaling</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>88</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/ANNUREV.ARPLANT.52.1.67</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rieu</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eriksson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Powers</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Griffiths</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Woolley</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Genetic analysis reveals that C19-GA 2-oxidation is a major gibberellin inactivation pathway in arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>2420</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2436</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/TPC.108.058818</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rudrappa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Czymmek</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Par&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bais</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Root-secreted malic acid recruits beneficial soil bacteria</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>148</volume>, <fpage>1547</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1556</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/PP.108.127613</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sardans</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pe&#xf1;uelas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Potassium: a neglected nutrient in global change</article-title>. <source>Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>275</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/GEB.12259</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schomburg</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bizzell</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeevaart</surname> <given-names>J. A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amasino</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Overexpression of a novel class of gibberellin 2-oxidases decreases gibberellin levels and creates dwarf plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/TPC.005975</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Comparative genomic analysis of four representative plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in pseudomonas</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-14-271</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shin</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>W. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ha</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Genetic identification of ACC-RESISTANT2 reveals involvement of LYSINE HISTIDINE TRANSPORTER1 in the uptake of 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylic acid in arabidopsis thaliana</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Physiol.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>572</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>582</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/PCP/PCU201</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Silambarasan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Logeswari</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cornejo</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kannan</surname> <given-names>V. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Role of plant growth&#x2013;promoting rhizobacterial consortium in improving the vigna radiata growth and alleviation of aluminum and drought stresses</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. pollut. Res.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>27647</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27659</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/S11356-019-05939-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Son</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>G. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cha</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heo</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Solubilization of insoluble inorganic phosphates by a novel salt- and pH-tolerant pantoea agglomerans r-42 isolated from soybean rhizosphere</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>204</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>210</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2005.02.021</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Spaepen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bossuyt</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Engelen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marchal</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vanderleyden</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Phenotypical and molecular responses of arabidopsis thaliana roots as a result of inoculation with the auxin-producing bacterium azospirillum brasilense</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>201</volume>, <fpage>850</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>861</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/NPH.12590</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Staswick</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Serban</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rowe</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tiryaki</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maldonado</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maldonado</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Characterization of an arabidopsis enzyme family that conjugates amino acids to indole-3-Acetic acid</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>616</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>627</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/TPC.104.026690</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Strand</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pritchard</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCormack</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oren</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Irreconcilable differences: fine-root life spans and soil carbon persistence</article-title>. <source>Science.</source> <volume>319</volume>, <fpage>456</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>458</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/SCIENCE.1151382</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tahir</surname> <given-names>H. A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raza</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hanif</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Plant growth promotion by volatile organic compounds produced by bacillus subtilis SYST2</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/FMICB.2017.00171</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tien</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaskins</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hubbell</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>Plant growth substances produced by azospirillum brasilense and their effect on the growth of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum l.)</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <elocation-id>1016</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.37.5.1016-1024.1979</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Timmusk</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nicander</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Granhall</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tillberg</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Cytokinin production by paenibacillus polymyxa</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>1847</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1852</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00113-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tsuchisaka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Theologis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Unique and overlapping expression patterns among the arabidopsis 1-Amino-Cyclopropane-1-Carboxylate synthase gene family members</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>136</volume>, <fpage>2982</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/PP.104.049999</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tsukanova</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#x421;h&#x435;b&#x43e;t&#x430;r</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meyer</surname> <given-names>J. J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bibikova</surname> <given-names>T. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on plant hormone homeostasis</article-title>. <source>South Afr. J. Bot.</source> <volume>113</volume>, <fpage>91</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.SAJB.2017.07.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vanderstraeten</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Straeten</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Accumulation and transport of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) in plants: current status, considerations for future research and agronomic applications</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.00038</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Van Wees</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Ent</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pieterse</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Plant immune responses triggered by beneficial microbes</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>443</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>448</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.PBI.2008.05.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vater</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herfort</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doellinger</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weydmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dietel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faetke</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Fusaricidins from paenibacillus polymyxa m-1, a family of lipohexapeptides of unusual complexity&#x2013;a mass spectrometric study</article-title>. <source>J. Mass Spectrom.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/JMS.3891</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>H.-L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Preet Padda</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Transcriptome profiles reveal the growth-promoting mechanisms of paenibacillus polymyxa YC0136 on tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum l.)</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>584174</elocation-id> doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.584174</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>clusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data</article-title>. <source>Innov. (Camb)</source> <volume>2</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>100141</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.XINN.2021.100141</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kloepper</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryu</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.TPLANTS.2008.10.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nesme</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>R&#xf8;der</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Emergent bacterial community properties induce enhanced drought tolerance in arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41522-021-00253-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zamioudis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mastranesti</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dhonukshe</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blilou</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pieterse</surname> <given-names>C. M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Unraveling root developmental programs initiated by beneficial pseudomonas spp. bacteria</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>162</volume>, <fpage>304</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>318</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.112.212597</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B89">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Root exudates metabolic profiling suggests distinct defense mechanisms between resistant and susceptible tobacco cultivars against black shank disease</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.559775</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>