<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1150832</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Root morphological and physiological traits and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi shape phosphorus-acquisition strategies of 12 vegetable species</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pu</surname>
<given-names>Zitian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Ruifang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Hong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Qingyun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1904794"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Jianheng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2022896"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Xin-Xin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1863084"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation, Hebei Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Baoding</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Mountain Area Research Institute, Hebei Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Baoding</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>College of Horticulture, Hebei Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Baoding</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Key Laboratory of North China Water-Saving Agriculture of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Baoding</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Hongbo Li, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Yang Lyu, China Agricultural University, China; Tao Zhang, Northeast Normal University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Xin-Xin Wang, <email xlink:href="mailto:sywxx@hebau.edu.cn">sywxx@hebau.edu.cn</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>08</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1150832</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>25</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Pu, Zhang, Wang, Li, Zhang and Wang</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Pu, Zhang, Wang, Li, Zhang and Wang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Trait plasticity and integration mediate vegetable adaptive strategies. However, it is unclear how patterns of vegetables in root traits influence vegetable adaptation to different phosphorus (P) levels. Nine root traits and six shoot traits were investigated in 12 vegetable species cultivated in a greenhouse with low and high P supplies to identify distinct adaptive mechanisms in relation to P acquisition (40 and 200 P mg kg<sup>-1</sup> as KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>). At the low P level, a series of negative correlations among root morphology, exudates and mycorrhizal colonization, and different types of root functional properties (root morphology, exudates and mycorrhizal colonization) respond differently to soil P levels among vegetable species. non-mycorrhizal plants showed relatively stable root traits as compared to solanaceae plants that showed more altered root morphologies and structural traits. At the low P level, the correlation between root traits of vegetable crops was enhanced. It was also found in vegetables that low P supply enhances the correlation of morphological structure while high P supply enhances the root exudation and the correlation between mycorrhizal colonization and root traits. Root exudation combined with root morphology and mycorrhizal symbiosis to observe P acquisition strategies in different root functions. Vegetables respond highly under different P conditions by enhancing the correlation of root traits. Low P supply could significantly improve the direct and indirect ways of mycorrhizal vegetable crops&#x2019; root traits axis on shoot biomass, and enhance the direct way of non-mycorrhizal vegetable crops&#x2019; root traits axis and reduce the indirect way of root exudates.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>interspecific variation</kwd>
<kwd>intraspecific variation</kwd>
<kwd>phosphorus acquisition</kwd>
<kwd>root functional traits</kwd>
<kwd>root plasticity</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="66"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="6872"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Functional Plant Ecology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Phosphorus (P) is one of the major factors limiting primary productivity in natural and agricultural ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Vitousek et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Johnston et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>), because of its low availability and mobility in most soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Schachtman et&#xa0;al., 1998</xref>). In response to P stress, plants have modulated various root mechanisms to facilitate P uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lambers et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Shen et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Lizbeth Lopez-Arredondo et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Typical root morphological changes include increasing specific root length (SRL) and fine root length ratio to simultaneously broaden the detection range of soil volume by roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Vance et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Postma et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Haling et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Plants can also mine P by raising organic acid anions, phosphatase, and proton secretion (together known as P-activated exudates) to increase the activation of insoluble inorganic P and organic P in the rhizosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hinsinger et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Richardson et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Pang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Different P acquisition abilities improves the uptake of soil P such as (1) the increase of root/shoot ratio (RSR) and root length; (2) increased SRL and decreased root tissue density (RTD) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Jonathan, 2018</xref>); (3) increased phosphatase activity and carboxylates exudation, and changed the pH of rhizosphere soil, thus increasing the availability of P in the rhizosphere soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lambers et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Jones et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Plants can develop the ability to adapt low P environment through different combinations of root traits, some plants show changes in root morphological traits, and some enhance the secretion capacity of activated P compounds in roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Li et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Wen et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Such variations in the combination of root properties were found in distinct plant species and variants of the same species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Comas and Eissenstat, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">McCormack et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Weemstra et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>), As a result, plants exhibit varying ability to acquire soil P resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Gu et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Furthermore, P stress can stimulate and accelerate the creation of symbiotic relationships between plant roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), which create symbioses with the majority of plant species and accelerate P uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Smith and Read, 2008</xref>). Outside of the root P depletion zone, the mycelial network can access inorganic P sources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Clark and Zeto, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Smith et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">van der Heijden et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The adaptive regulation of plant root morphology, P-activated exudates and mycorrhizal symbiosis is beneficial to P uptake by plants. Different mechanisms of P uptake among different strategies are existed significantly that may also be different on the basis of input costs (such as resources and energy) and advantageous to roots for every strategy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lambers et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Ryan et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Lynch, 2015</xref>). The root morphology of grasses like maize and wheat demonstrated a good adaptive response to P stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Lyu et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Wen et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Increasing the rate of P application can dramatically lower the occurrence of AMF infection in maize and wheat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Teng et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Meanwhile, legume plants showed a limited morphological response to P supply alterations, whereas root exudates showed considerable modifications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Lyu et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Till date, no research has been conducted on the root trait, root exudates, and mycorrhizal colonization of vegetable crops under different P levels. As a result, an intriguing and unanswered scientific question arises: how do vegetable crops coordinate root function features (i.e., root morphology, root exudates, and mycorrhizal traits) in response to changes in soil P availability?</p>
<p>Some of the early studies provide tremendous information by comparing the responses of root systems of different crop species to P supply information. In comparison of root physiology, certain plants demonstrated a good adaptive response to P stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Lyu et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Wen et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>); similarly, solanaceae showed strong root variation ability, broad bean (<italic>Vicia faba</italic> L.) had limited root morphological responses to varied P supplies, but there were significant alterations in root secretions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Lyu et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Wen et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). However, root secretions only had a minor inhibitory effect on broad bean roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Meanwhile, the recent research has revealed that wheat can improve the plant&#x2019;s low P tolerance by enhancing the association between above- and below-ground traits under low P conditions, several crops can maximize fitness by enhancing co-variation among root features associated to P acquisition (Wang et&#xa0;al., 2023). It is hypothesized that the soil itself has a low P content in a low P environment, and it requires physiological changes to promote P absorption. As a result, methods such as enhancing the correlation between plant root characteristic are the embodiment of various vegetable species&#x2019; low P tolerance. Mycorrhizal colonization was dramatically reduced as P application rate increased, although only slight restriction in broad bean roots was observed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Teng et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). These findings revealed that, in response to low P stress, there could be synergies and trade-offs between root function aspects of different plants, culminating in diverse subsurface methods for improving P acquisition by different crop species. However, most previous research has focused on one or two traits among crop root shape, root secretion, and mycorrhizal symbiosis, with only a few vegetable crop species addressed concurrently (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Brown et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Lyu et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Wen et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). As a result, it is necessary to monitor and analyze the response qualities of these root functional traits across a large range of vegetable crop species at the same time. This will lead to a better understanding of the interplay between root characteristics in varied soil environments, ultimately enhancing soil P uptake and the performance of vegetable crops.</p>
<p>The purpose of our study is to address: (1) how do vegetable plants coordinate root functional features (i.e., root morphology, root exudates, and mycorrhizal qualities) in response to variations in external soil P availability? (2) the effects of diverse P environments on the correlation of root characteristics in several vegetable species. This study determined the above- and below-ground features by setting the two components 12 vegetable species at two P levels), selected six genera of different crops, under varied P source environment. We primarily evaluated the two hypotheses listed below: (1) there are trade-offs among root morphology, exudates, and mycorrhizal colonization. different types of root functional characteristics (root morphology, exudates, and mycorrhizal properties) respond differently to variable soil P levels within or between vegetable species; (2) the association between root characteristics of vegetable crops is stronger at lower P availability than at higher P availability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Experimental design</title>
<p>The experiment was set up as a randomized complete block design, with two factors: (1) vegetable species: 12 vegetable species; (2) P supplies (as KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>): 40 and 200 mg P kg<sup>-1</sup> soil. The experiment was carried out with five replicates and total 120 pots were used. To reduce the effects of fixed plant position within blocks, pots within each block were re-randomized weekly.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Vegetable species and soil collection</title>
<p>We selected 12 common vegetable species, nine of the species form a symbiosis with AMF (Amaryllidaceae: allium (<italic>Allium fistulosum</italic> L., Af), garlic (<italic>Allium sativum</italic> L., As); Cucurbitaceae: cucumber (<italic>Cucumis sativus</italic> L.), melon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic>),; Compositae: lettuce (<italic>Lactuca sativa</italic> Linn.); chrysanthemum (<italic>Chrysanthemum coronarium</italic> L.); Solanaceae: pepper (<italic>Capsicum annuum</italic>), eggplant (<italic>Solanum melongena</italic> L.), tomato (<italic>Lycopersicon esculentum</italic>). Three of the species were well-known non-AM (NM) species, Chenopodiaceae: spinach (<italic>Spinacia oleracea</italic> L.), sugar beet (<italic>Beta vulgaris</italic> L.); cruciferous: rape (<italic>Brassica chinensis</italic> Linn.); These were included in the experiment based on their agronomic importance and the fact that their P-acquisition techniques are expected to differ from AM species. The 12 vegetable species show a varied evolutionary lineage and a wide range of variation in root functional properties.</p>
<p>The low-P soil fallow for two years was collected from Sun Gezhuang Village, Xiongxian County, Baoding City, Hebei Province (116&#xb0;09&#x2019; E, 39&#xb0;05&#x2019; N). The 5 mm sieved, air-dried soil was mixed thoroughly. The soil properties were as follows: pH 7.38 (ratio of clay to water was 1:2.5), total nitrogen 1.32 g kg<sup>-1</sup>, available P 2.29 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, available potassium 123 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, organic carbon 13.6 g kg<sup>-1</sup>, and total potassium 19.73 g kg<sup>-1</sup>. Plastic flowerpots (height: 15 cm, top diameter: 20 cm, and bottom diameter: 12 cm) were filled with 2 kg dry soil per pot.</p>
<p>We used a P supply of 40 mgkg<sup>-1</sup> soil for the low-P treatment (LP), and 200 mgkg<sup>-1</sup> soil for the high-P treatment (HP), KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> was used as P resource. soil was also supplemented with basal nutrients at the following rates (mg kg<sup>-1</sup>): N 100 (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>), K 327 (K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>), Ca 46 (CaCl<sub>2</sub>), Mg 4.2 (MgSO<sub>4</sub>7H<sub>2</sub>O), Fe 0.88 (EDTAFe-Na), Na 0.36 (EDTAFe-Na), Mn 1.8 (MnSO<sub>4</sub>H<sub>2</sub>O), Zn 2.5 (ZnSO<sub>4</sub>7H<sub>2</sub>O), Cu 0.57 (CuSO<sub>4</sub>5H<sub>2</sub>O) to optimize the required nutrient availability. To maintain the same soil K level among all treatments, K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> was supplied at 561 mg K kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil in the treatments at 40 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> soil. The indigenous AMF colonized the roots of crops cultivated in the native soil, no extra AMF inocula were added.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Plant growth conditions</title>
<p>The experiment was conducted in a light culture room at the west campus of Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding City, Hebei Province (39&#xb0;04&#x2019; N, 116&#xb0;09&#x2019; E). Seeds were surface-sterilized (30 min in a 5.0% (v/v) H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> solution), rinsed, and germinated in a growth chamber with a dark and humid environment at 20&#xb0;C. Depending on species, three to six uniform seedlings were planted per pot, and seedlings were later thinned to the plant number of one. Pots were watered daily by weight to 60% &#xb1; 10% field capacity. The room temperatures were maintained at 22-27&#xb0;C with relative humidity of 45%-55%. All crop varieties begin to grow on July 21st, 2019. Twelve vegetables were harvested on September 15th, 2019, and the remaining two allium vegetables were harvested on October 1st, 2019, because of their initial slow growth of allium. At time of harvest, the visual differences in shoot growth of all 12 vegetables were observed under both LP and HP conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Harvest and measurements</title>
<p>At the time of harvest, the leaves and stem were separated from the root system with scissors. The fresh biomass of the above-ground was measured and stored into the envelope to keep into the oven, which was dried at 105&#xb0;C for 30 min and 72&#xb0;C for 48 h. Shoot P concentration was determined by the standard vanado-molybdate method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Murphy and Riley, 1986</xref>) after digestion in a H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> mixture at 360&#xb0;C for 2 h. We measured ten root traits in three categories: seven root morphological traits: root biomass, root/shoot ratio, root length and fine roots (root diameter &lt; 0.2 mm) length, root diameter, SRL and specific fine root length (SFRL); and two root physiological traits: carboxylates in the rhizosphere, acid phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere; and mycorrhizal colonization. A full description of every root trait is explained as below.</p>
<p>After sampling the rhizosphere soil, all visible roots were picked out from every pot. Root samples were washed with de-ionized water and frozen at -20&#xb0;C prior to measurement of root morphological parameters. Cleaned root samples were dispersed in water in a transparent array (30 &#xd7; 20 &#xd7; 3 cm) and scanned with an EPSON scanner at a resolution of 400 dpi (Epson Expression 1600 pro, Model EU-35, Japan). The root traits such as length and diameter were determined by analysis of images using WinRHIZO Pro software (Regent Instruments Inc, Quebec, Canada) software. SRL (m g<sup>-1</sup>) was assessed as the ratio of root length over root weight. After scanning of root samples, the roots were also oven-dried at 70&#xb0;C for three days and weighed as root biomass to further calculating the root/shoot biomass ratio. In addition, we calculated SRL by root length over root biomass, assuming that roots were perfectly cylinders.</p>
<p>Acid phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere was measured according to (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Alvey et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>) using <italic>p</italic>-nitrophenylphosphate (<italic>p</italic>-NPP). The roots with tightly adhering rhizosphere soil were transferred into 200-mL vials containing 0.2 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution depending on root volume (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Murphy and Riley, 1986</xref>). The pH value of Na-acetate buffer (200 mM) was adjusted to the average pH values (5.4) of the rhizosphere soil. The rhizosphere soil in the CaCl<sub>2</sub> suspension was separated by centrifugation of 10 min at 12,000 &#xd7; <italic>g</italic> and dried at 60&#xb0;C before weighing it. The concentration of <italic>p</italic>-NPP in the supernatant was measured spectrophotometrically at 405 nm.</p>
<p>Carboxylates in the rhizosphere soil were analyzed using a reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system according to a previous report (modified from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Shen et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). The chromatographic separation was conducted on a 250 &#xd7; 4.6 mM reversed-phase column (Alltima C18, 5 Micrometers; Alltech Associates Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA). The mobile phase was 25 mM KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (pH 2.25) with a flow rate of 1 ml min<sup>-1</sup> at 31&#xb0;C. Detection of carboxylates was carried out at 214 nm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Root samples were treated with 10% (w/v) KOH solution in a 90&#xb0;C water bath for 20 min, rinsed with water, acidified with 2% (v/v) HCl for 5 min at room temperature to make it transparent, and then stained with 0.05% (w/v) nonvital Trypan blue in a 90&#xb0;C water bath for 30 minutes. Stained root fragments were placed in a lactic acid-glycerol-water (v/v/v, 1:1:1) solution overnight to remove excess stain. For each sample, 30 stained root fragments of second-order roots with an average length of 1 cm were selected randomly and observed with light microscope after mounted on two slides. Colonization by AMF (%) was assessed using the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Trouvelot et&#xa0;al. (1986)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>To find out how two shoot parameters and eleven root features of 12 distinct vegetable species responded to varied P levels, we used a two-way ANOVA with a randomized block to examine the effects of P treatments, two main factors and their interaction on shoot biomass, P concentration, and eleven root traits. Significant differences among means were based on the t-test (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). Spearman&#x2019;s correlation analysis was used to investigate the pairwise associations of root traits in order to examine possible coordination or trade-offs in variance of the two shoot parameters and eleven root traits among 12 vegetable traits. All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 26.0 statistical software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY., USA).</p>
<p>We also used principal component analysis (PCA) to investigate trait interactions and to represent vegetable species in a lower dimensional space. PCA plots were constructed in Origin 2021b (OriginLab, Northampton, MA., USA).</p>
<p>We used linear regression to investigate the associations between root trait, AMF, A-Pase, and carboxylates and shoot biomass. We anticipated that the first root trait axis would contribute to shoot biomass both directly and indirectly through its interactions with AMF, A-Pase, and carboxylates. We focused on the root trait axis rather than individual root traits because we lacked the statistical power to fit causal linkages between root traits, AMF, A-Pase, and carboxylates while meeting model fit parameter criteria.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>Shoot trait variations in response to P concentration</title>
<p>The two shoot features showed significant variance among species, as demonstrated by the two-way ANOVA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The interaction of P applications and species had a significant effect on root biomass and root P concentration (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). Low P treatment reduced the biomass of all parts of vegetables and the variation of different P application in all parts of vegetables under low P condition is consistent with the variation of biomass (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A&#x2013;F</bold>
</xref>). At the same time, the biomass and P concentration of fruit vegetables were more significantly responsive to P level changes than that of leaf vegetables. For example, which the change of solanaceae was obvious, compared with high P treatment, root, stem and leaf biomass of eggplant was reduced by 94.7%, 91.1%, and 85.2%, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A&#x2013;C</bold>
</xref>). Meanwhile, the P concentration in different parts of other vegetable crops decreased significantly except that the P concentration in stem of scallion, watermelon, and leaf of pepper increased significantly. For example, stem P concentration in onion increased 46.2% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1E</bold>
</xref>). Cucumber and watermelon leaf P concentration increased 16.2% and 29.8%, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1F</bold>
</xref>). The P concentration of non-mycorrhizal plants decreased obviously (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1D&#x2013;F</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Results of two-way ANOVA for root functional traits among 12 vegetables species and two soil phosphorus (P) treatments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Traits</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="center">Species</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="center">P treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="center">Species &#xd7;P treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">df</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">F</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>P</italic> value</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">df</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">F</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>P</italic> value</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">df</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">F</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>P</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ShB</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">268</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">638</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">75.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">RB</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">57.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">443</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">SPC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">367</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">217</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">RPC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">304</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">870</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">RD</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">64.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">SFRL</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">38.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.72</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">SRL</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">33.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.62</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">FRL</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">38.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">122</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">RL</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">127</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">456</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">67.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">RTD</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.62</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.206</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">A-Pase</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.075</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.29</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Carboxylates</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">154</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">119</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">MC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">213</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">547</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>The data in (MC) are without non-mycorrhizal species (n=10). Trait abbreviations: Shoot biomass (ShB), root biomass (RB), shoot P concentration (SPC), root P concentration (RPC), average diameter of roots (RD), specific fine root length (SFRL), specific root length (SRL), fine root length (FRL), root length (RL), root tissue density (RTD), colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (MC), the amounts of carboxylates in the rhizosphere (carboxylates) and acid phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere (A-Pase).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>The responses of root biomass <bold>(A)</bold>, stem biomass <bold>(B)</bold>, leaf biomass <bold>(C)</bold>, root P concentration <bold>(D)</bold>, stem P concentration <bold>(E)</bold>, and leaf P concentration <bold>(F)</bold> to soil phosphorus <bold>(P)</bold> availability among 12 crop species. Each value is the mean ( &#xb1; SE) of fifive replicates. * indicates significant difference between different P treatments within each species (based on Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> analysis, <italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05). Species abbreviation: allium (<italic>Allium fistulosum</italic> L., Af); garlic (<italic>Allium sativum</italic> L., As); cucumber (<italic>Cucumis sativus</italic> L., Cs); melon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic>, Cl); spinach (<italic>Spinacia oleracea</italic> L., So); sugar beet (<italic>Beta vulgaris</italic> L., Bv); rape (<italic>Brassica chinensis</italic> Linn., Bc); lettuce (<italic>Lactuca sativa</italic> Linn., Ls); chrysanthemum (<italic>Chrysanthemum coronarium</italic> L., Cc); pepper (<italic>Capsicum annuum</italic>, Ca); eggplant (<italic>Solanum melongena</italic> L., Sm); tomato (<italic>Lycopersicon esculentum</italic>, Le).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1150832-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Root trait variations in response to P concentration</title>
<p>The eleven root functional properties varied substantially among species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Eleven traits also varied significantly with the interaction of P treatment and species (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). As a result, the intensity and direction of root trait responses to P supply in different soils diverged between species. All eleven traits varied greatly among all 12 vegetables at two P levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A&#x2013;F</bold>
</xref>). At the same time, the root structure and root exudates of fruit vegetable species were more sensitive to phosphorus water than those of leaf vegetable species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A&#x2013;F</bold>
</xref>). Under the LP condition, SFRL of two solanaceae vegetables, watermelon and chrysanthemum was significantly enhanced regardless of low or high P application. Eggplant showed the prominent noticeable variation, increasing by 61.1% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>). SRL of onion, watermelon, solanaceae plants and spinach were significantly increased under low P condition, compared with the traits under the HP condition. Garlic showed the largest increase by 121% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>). RTD of onion, chrysanthemum, pepper, spinach and carrot non-mycorrhizal plants were severely altered by LP except for garden chrysanthemum, RTD of other plants was significantly decreased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>The responses of specific fine root length <bold>(A)</bold>, specific root length <bold>(B)</bold>, root tissue density <bold>(C)</bold>, fine root length <bold>(D)</bold>, root length <bold>(E)</bold>, and average diameter of roots <bold>(F)</bold> to soil phosphorus <bold>(P)</bold> availability among 12 crop species. Each value is the mean (&#xb1; SE) of five replicates. * indicates significant difference between different P treatments within each species (based on Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> analysis, <italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05). Species abbreviation: allium (<italic>Allium fistulosum</italic> L., Af); garlic (<italic>Allium sativum</italic> L., As); cucumber (<italic>Cucumis sativus</italic> L., Cs); melon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic>, Cl); spinach (<italic>Spinacia oleracea</italic> L., So); sugar beet (<italic>Beta vulgaris</italic> L., Bv); rape (<italic>Brassica chinensis</italic> Linn., Bc); lettuce (<italic>Lactuca sativa</italic> Linn., Ls);chrysanthemum (<italic>Chrysanthemum coronarium</italic> L., Cc); pepper (<italic>Capsicum annuum</italic>, Ca); eggplant (<italic>Solanum melongena</italic> L., Sm); tomato (<italic>Lycopersicon esculentum</italic>, Le).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1150832-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Compared with the three root structural traits, the morphological traits of each vegetable root altered more significantly (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Under the LP condition, cucumber, spinach, chrysanthemum, pepper and eggplant all showed similar variation of fine root length and root length, which were lower than at HP treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2D, E</bold>
</xref>). The two root morphological traits of eggplant reduced more significantly significant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2D, E</bold>
</xref>). Compared with HP, fine root length and root length of eggplant at LP were reduced 75.9%, 91.4%, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2D, E</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>LP treatment significantly enhanced mycorrhizal colonization (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>) for all 10 AM vegetable species, especially for solanaceae crops. Mycorrhizal colonization of eggplant and pepper was increased up to 35.6% and 31.3%. Despite the fact that high P treatment reduced AMF colonization in some crops, allium plants had a higher AMF colonization. For example, allium and garlic had 75.8% and 57.5% mycorrhizal colonization at LP, although HP supply considerably hindered mycorrhizal colonization, they maintained high mycorrhizal colonization (44.1% and 42.9%).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>The responses of mycorrhizal colonization <bold>(A)</bold>, the amounts of carboxylates in the rhizosphere (carboxylates) <bold>(B)</bold>, and acid phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere (A-Pase) <bold>(C)</bold> to soil phosphorus <bold>(P)</bold> availability among 18 crop species. Each value is the mean ( &#xb1; SE) of fifive replicates. * indicates significant difference between different P treatments within each species (based on Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> analysis, <italic>P</italic> &#x2264; 0.05). Species abbreviation: allium (<italic>Allium fistulosum</italic> L., Af); garlic (<italic>Allium sativum</italic> L., As); cucumber (<italic>Cucumis sativus</italic> L., Cs); melon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic>, Cl); spinach (<italic>Spinacia oleracea</italic> L., So); sugar beet (<italic>Beta vulgaris</italic> L., Bv); rape (<italic>Brassica chinensis</italic> Linn., Bc); lettuce (<italic>Lactuca sativa</italic> Linn., Ls); chrysanthemum (<italic>Chrysanthemum coronarium</italic> L., Cc); pepper (<italic>Capsicum annuum</italic>, Ca); eggplant (<italic>Solanum melongena</italic> L., Sm); tomato (<italic>Lycopersicon esculentum</italic>, Le).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1150832-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>HP supply inhibited the content of carboxylates in the rhizosphere (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). The content of carboxylates in the rhizosphere of vegetables was significantly increased (46.4% ~ 457.1%) under the LP condition compared to HP treatment. Both at LP and HP level, only A-Pase activity of onion and garlic was significantly varied (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold>
</xref>), and LP levels reduced onion A-Pase activity considerably while increasing the A-Pase activity of garlic.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>Correlations between shoot P concentration and root traits among 12 vegetables varieties</title>
<p>As indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, the LP treatment considerably increased the correlations between root features when compared to the HP treatment. Mycorrhizal colonization was substantially correlated with SRL and SFRL in the LP condition. Under the LP condition, RTD was substantially associated with mycorrhizal colonization, carboxylaters, and A-Pase as compared to the HP condition.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Phenotypic correlations coefficients among plant traits across 12 vegetables species grown at the high P level (200 mg P kg<sup>-1</sup> soil, low-left diagonal) and at the low P level (40 mg P kg<sup>-1</sup> soil, upper-right diagonal).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ShB</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">RB</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">SPC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">RPC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">RD</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">SFRL</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">SRL</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">RTD</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">A-Pase</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Carboxylates</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">MC</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ShB</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.65**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.46**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.48**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.28**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.29**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.29*</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.55**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.49**</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">RB</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.29*</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.79**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.78**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.64**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.66**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">SPC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.30**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.41**</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">RPC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.26*</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.59**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.58**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.59**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.59***</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">RD</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.30*</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.70**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.70**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">SFRL</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.52**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.99**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.46**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.27**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">SRL</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.52**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.99**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.47**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">RTD</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.43**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.64**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.64**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.49**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.37**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.35*</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">A-Pase</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.29**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.28*</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.27**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Carboxylates</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.82**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.19</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">MC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.69**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.32*</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.62**</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>The data in (MC) are without non-mycorrhizal species (n=9). Trait abbreviations: Shoot biomass (ShB), root biomass (RB), shoot P concentration (SPC), root P concentration (RPC), average diameter of roots (RD), specific fine root length (SFRL), specific root length (SRL), root tissue density (RTD), colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (MC), the amounts of carboxylates in the rhizosphere (carboxylates) and acid phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere (A-Pase). Significant correlations are in bold: *, 0.01 &lt; P &#x2264; 0.05; **, P &#x2264; 0.01.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Under LP condition, 24 groups of root traits were noticeably correlated. But at HP treatment, only 4 groups of root traits were significantly correlated. Compared with the LP treatment, the correlation of root traits of vegetable crops decreased by 83.33% at the HP level.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>Correlations among eight root traits under HP and LP conditions</title>
<p>PCA results demonstrated that 6 root functional traits of 9 mycorrhizal vegetables species in the HP treatment showed 82.8% variation in the first two components (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;S1</bold>
</xref>). At the HP level, the first two principal components (PC) made up 49.9% and 32.9% of the total variation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>). Root diameter, RTD, SRL and SFRL had a strong contribution to PC1, whereas root length and fine root length mainly contributed to PC2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>). Under the LP condition, the first two PCs made up 47.1% and 32.3% of the total variation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Principal component analysis (PCA) of six root traits for 9 mycorrhizal vegetables species in response to the high P (200 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> soil applied; <bold>(A)</bold>, the low P supply (40 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> as KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>; <bold>(B)</bold> and 3 non-mycorrhizal vegetables species in response to the high P (200 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> soil applied; <bold>(C)</bold>, the low P supply (40 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> as KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>; <bold>(D)</bold>. Trait notations: average diameter of roots (RD), specific fine root length (SFRL), specific root length (SRL) fine root length (FRL), root length (RL), root tissue density (RTD). Species abbreviation: allium (<italic>Allium fistulosum</italic> L., Af); garlic (<italic>Allium sativum</italic> L., As); cucumber (<italic>Cucumis sativus</italic> L., Cs); melon (<italic>Citrullus lanatus</italic>, Cl); spinach (<italic>Spinacia oleracea</italic> L., So); sugar beet (<italic>Beta vulgaris</italic> L., Bv); rape (<italic>Brassica chinensis</italic> Linn., Bc); lettuce (<italic>Lactuca sativa</italic> Linn., Ls); chrysanthemum (<italic>Chrysanthemum coronarium</italic> L., Cc); pepper (<italic>Capsicum annuum</italic>, Ca); eggplant (<italic>Solanum melongena</italic> L., Sm); tomato (<italic>Lycopersicon esculentum</italic>, Le).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1150832-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>PCA based on 6 root functional traits of 3 non-mycorrhizal vegetables species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4C, D</bold>
</xref>). At the HP level, the first two principal components (PC) made up 50.0% and 32.3% of the total variation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4C</bold>
</xref>). Root diameter, RTD and SRL had a strong contribution to PC1, whereas root length, fine root length and SFRL mainly contributed to PC2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4C</bold>
</xref>). At the LP level, the first two PCs made up 59.4% and 29.5% of the total variation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<title>Pathway analysis of root traits, AMF, A-Pase, carboxylates and shoot biomass</title>
<p>In the PCA, more vegetables species preferred axis 1, so axis 1 was taken as the root axis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Under the HP condition, shoot biomass of mycorrhizal vegetables species was indirectly measured by the first axis of root traits through carboxylaters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold>
</xref>; RFA; RMSEA &lt; 0.001). In addition, RFA can also direct affect A-Pase activity (path analysis model fit:RMSEA &lt; 0.001). Except for the indirect root axis-carboxylater pathway, the direct root axis pathway was improved under the LP condition (path analysis model fit: RMSEA &lt; 0.001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>). Meanwhile, RFA can also directly affect A-Pase activity and mycorrhizal colonization (path analysis model fit:RMSEA &lt; 0.001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of root traits axis, mycorrhizal colonization, (AMF) the amounts of carboxylates in the rhizosphere (carboxylates) and acid phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere (A-Pase) on shoot biomass. First axis of the root economics traits, AMF, carboxylates and A-Pase in path analysis for mycorrhizal vegetables species to the high P (200 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> soil applied; <bold>(A)</bold>, the low P supply (40 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> as KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>; <bold>(B)</bold> and non-mycorrhizal vegetables species to the high P (200 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> soil applied; <bold>(C)</bold>, the low P supply (40 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> as KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>; <bold>(D)</bold>. Red arrows indicate positive relationship, and blue arrows indicate negative relationship. Dark solid line arrow indicates significant relationships (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.01), light-colored line arrow indicates significant relationships (0.01 &lt; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) and dashed lines indicate that there is no path association (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1150832-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Under the HP condition, shoot biomass of non-mycorrhizal vegetables species was measured indirectly <italic>via</italic> the first axis of root traits through carboxylates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold>
</xref>; RFA; RMSEA &lt; 0.001). In addition, A-Pase activity can also directly affect the shoot biomass (path analysis model fit:RMSEA &lt; 0.001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold>
</xref>). Under the LP condition, only the direct pathway in the root axis affect shoot biomass (path analysis model fit: RMSEA &lt; 0.001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<title>Shoot and root growth traits of 12 vegetable species</title>
<p>P concentration in stem and leaf is not only an important indicator for evaluating P nutrition in plants, but it is also an important method for determining whether P stress inhibits crop yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Barry and Miller, 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bollons and Barraclough, 1999</xref>). In this study, the P concentration in the shoots of 12 vegetables declined at low P level, and the changes in biomass and P concentration in all regions of the vegetables appeared to be constant. Under low P condition, all vegetables showed consistent changes of shoot biomass and P concentration, especially in leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Previous researches revealed that the trade-offs between root traits and mycorrhizal colonization in nutrient acquisition play a significant impact in plant P uptake in natural ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lambers et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). According to the results, various vegetable root traits and mycorrhizal colonization demonstrated varied mechanisms for soil P uptake under low P conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>3</bold>
</xref>). Generally, low soil P availability and shoot P deficiency improve the regulation of root morphology, the release of P activated exudates, or the alternative strategy: the symbiotic interaction with AMF (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Ryan et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), whereas they are significantly inhibited by high shoot P concentration and high soil P availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Teng et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Wen et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). All of these adaptive responses indicated that plants may modify numerous root functional properties to achieve a balance of costs and benefits under varied P conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Lynch, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">van der Heijden et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Weemstra et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). We found that lettuce, chrysanthemum under low P condition had high RTD and low SRL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Exploration of bigger soil volumes in low P conditions leads to a reduced cost per unit root length (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">McCormack et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Kramer-Walter et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, spinach, beet and rape were all non-mycorrhizal vegetables (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Wang and Qiu, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Lambers et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), and we did not observe mycorrhizal colonization of these vegetable species. Non-mycorrhizal vegetables had more stable root structure and morphological characteristics (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Non-mycorrhizal plants did not exhibit stronger root exudation capabilities under low P condition. Most non-mycorrhizal plants adopt a single strategy under low P condition, and non-mycorrhizal plants acquired P by depending on root morphological and structural traits as compared to mycorrhizal vegetable species.</p>
<p>Increasing soil P availability significantly reduced the symbiotic relationship between roots and AMF (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Teng et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). We concluded that increased P levels reduced mycorrhizal colonization in all mycorrhizal plants. It is noteworthy that mycorrhizal colonization of the two alliaceae species were the highest under both low and high P conditions. This result may be due to the shorter root length, finer root length and the smaller root surface area of alliaceae species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). In addition, a large number of previous studies have reported that alliaceae plants have a relatively thicker root diameter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Itoh and Barber, 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">F&#xf6;hse et&#xa0;al., 1991</xref>), probably leading to the weak regulation of root morphology in allium plants. As a result, they rely more on mycorrhizal symbiosis to improve the detection of soil P, even under high P conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Wen et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>); for instance, the onion plants in the Netherlands showed high colonization under high P conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Galvan et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>Most vegetable species did not depend prominently on carboxylates and A-Pase to under low P stress to acquire P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3B, C</bold>
</xref>). These results were different from the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Wen et&#xa0;al. (2019)</xref>, who found under low P condition, fine-rooted plants usually showed lower carboxylater content and A-Pase activity in root sheath. Meanwhile, studies have shown that both root morphology and mycorrhizal colonization are regulated by P level (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lambers et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Shen et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). The release of P-activated secretions (such as organic acid anions) is a &#x201c;P mining&#x201d; strategy, but all of these strategies are modulated in favor of P uptake by plants. However, the input costs determined by each strategy may restrict the ability of vegetables to effectively express all strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Lynch and Ho, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Ryan et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Raven et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>); as a result, the expression form of vegetable root exudates was not important in this investigation.</p>
<p>The results showed that fruit vegetables were more responsive to changes in different P levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A&#x2013;F</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>2A&#x2013;F</bold>
</xref>). This may be fruit vegetables have different nutrient requirements compared with leaf vegetables. Leaf vegetables require more N throughout the growth cycle and more P at the peak of growth. However, the requirement of N and P of fruit vegetables was high during the whole growth cycle. Thus, the fruit vegetable species could be more inhibited by low P stress than leaf vegetable species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<title>Correlations and pathway relationship of root functional traits among vegetable species</title>
<p>In this study, we found that only a few root traits were related to shoot P concentration in both P treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), suggesting that plant P uptake was related to root biomass, root length and RTD (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). This result is consistent with the previous study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Kraft et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref>. However, the association of each individual trait with shoot growth is based on a complex trait co-variation, especially in the case of P deficiency (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Therefore, understanding the degree and pattern of trait integration among genotypes under different environmental situations might help us to better comprehend plant adaption methods. Co-variation patterns of traits represent important information about plant adaptation strategies selected under different environmental conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Laughlin, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Messier et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In this study, there was a strong correlation between root traits under low P condition (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The results supported our second hypothesis that the correlation between root traits of vegetable crops was enhanced under low P treatment. This suggests that under low P conditions, vegetable crops could improve co-variation between root characteristics, optimizing fitness. These results are consistent with the theory that trait integration generally increases with environmental stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Damian et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Delhaye et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, A-Pase and carboxylates were correlated with root traits lower (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), this is contrary to the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Shen et&#xa0;al. (2011)</xref>, suggesting that vegetable crops can maintain higher phosphatase activity and organic acid content in most combination of root and morphological traits to obtain inorganic P ultimately increasing plant yield. The covariation patterns among root traits were strongly influenced by P supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). In modern agriculture, plants with high fertilizer inputs are more conducive to P resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Milla et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), leading to the decreasing co-variation of traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Milla et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Roucou et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Root length and root/shoot ratio have great plasticity. Co-variation of traits with root reduction can potentially result in additional new trait combinations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Laughlin, 2014</xref>), to achieve diverse roles and enhance growth in high P environments.</p>
<p>We found that at high P level, vegetable crops depend on the indirect effect of root and carboxylates on crop yield. Though, vegetable crops had increased the direct effect of root at low P level. Meanwhile, mycorrhizal crops use more indirect pathways of influence, such as A-Pase activity-roots and AMF-roots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). Root morphology and regulation of AMF belong to &#x201c;P-scavening&#x201d; strategy, that enhanced the detection range of soil P in a complementary manner (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lambers et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Shen et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). In contrast, the release of P-activated secretions (e.g., carboxylates) is a &#x201c;P-mining&#x201d; technique for increasing soil P availability through coordination of exchange and chelation of insoluble phosphorus sources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Hinsinger, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Ryan et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Shen et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). Therefore, the yield of vegetable crops was significantly affected by the &#x201c;P-mining&#x201d; strategy, that is contrary to the research results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Lambers et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref>, who demonstrated that &#x201c;P-mining&#x201d; strategy was more effective when the P content in soil solution was very low and most of P was adsorbed or fixed by soil particles. We suggest that the occurrence of such phenomena may be because of soil P-mining, and vegetable crops can fully distribute their own required P. Under high P condition, the increase of root nutrient cost promotes the secretion of carboxylates, and dominance of &#x201c;P-mining&#x201d; strategy in vegetable crops. At low P level, mycorrhizal vegetables showed that both &#x201c;P-mining&#x201d; strategy and &#x201c;P-scavenging&#x201d; strategy affected vegetable yield. It demonstrates that vegetables use all means within own cost range to absorb more P. Non-mycorrhizal vegetables, on the other hand, lack mycorrhizal pathway absorption, reduce the cost and only root modifications (&#x201c;P-scavenging&#x201d; strategy) affect yield. In conclusion, vegetables can improve their ability to take up P under low P conditions by increasing the correlation of their own traits and boost the influencing pathways. Simultaneously, robust and diverse trait combinations would help vegetables produce more stable yield under varying P conditions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The present study provides a comprehensive framework for understanding how 12 vegetable species with varying P sensitivity coordinate two shoot traits and 13 root traits to acclimatize to varied P conditions. Our findings revealed that when under P stress, vegetables reduce their own exudation firstly. Non-mycorrhizal plants have relatively stable root traits, whereas solanaceae plants depend more on alterations in root morphological and structural traits. Finally, we revealed that plants were more likely to respond to low P stress by altering their own morphological structure correlation. Meantime, low P stress could significantly improve the direct and indirect ways of mycorrhizal vegetable crops&#x2019; root traits axis on shoot biomass, and enhance the direct way of non-mycorrhizal vegetable crops&#x2019; root traits axis and reduce the indirect way of root exudates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ZP, RZ and HW performed the experiment, collected the samples and the data. ZP analyzed the data and wrote the first version. HW, QL and JZ edited and revised the manuscript. XW designed the experiment and supported the fund and improved the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was financially supported by State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation (NCCIR2021ZZ-18), Key Research and Development Project of Hebei Province (21327005D), Modern Agro-industrial Technology Research System of Hebei (HBCT2021030214).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1150832/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1150832/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alvey</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bagayoko</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neumann</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buerkert</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Cereal/legume rotations affect chemical properties and biological activities in two West African soils</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>231</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1010386800937</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barry</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus nutritional requirement of maize seedlings for maximum yield</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>81</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>95</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>99</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf971065x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bollons</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barraclough</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Assessing the phosphorus status of winter wheat crops: inorganic orthophosphate in whole shoots</article-title>. <source>J. Agr Sci-Cambridge</source> <volume>133</volume>, <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>295</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0021859699007066</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>George</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barrett</surname> <given-names>G. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hubbard</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Interactions between root hair length and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation in phosphorus deficient barley (<italic>Hordeum vulgare</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>372</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-013-1718-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DeForest</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eissenstat</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Root morphology and mycorrhizal symbioses together shape nutrient foraging strategies of temperate trees</article-title>. <source>P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>113</volume> (<issue>31</issue>), <fpage>8741</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8746</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1601006113</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeto</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Mineral acquisition by arbuscular mycorrhizal plants</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>867</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>902</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01904160009382068</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Comas</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eissenstat</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>) <article-title>Patterns in root trait variation among 25 co-existing north American forest species</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>182</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>919</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>928</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02799.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Damian</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ochoa-Lopez</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaxiola</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fornoni</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dominguez</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boege</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Natural selection acting on integrated phenotypes: covariance among functional leaf traits increases plant fitness</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>225</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>546</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>557</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.16116</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Delhaye</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bauman</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seleck</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ilunga</surname> <given-names>E. I. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahy</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meerts</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Interspecific trait integration increases with environmental harshness: A case study along a metal toxicity gradient</article-title>. <source>Funct. Ecol.</source> <volume>34</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1428</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1437</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2435.13570</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Teng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tong</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Is the inherent potential of maize roots efficient for soil phosphorus acquisition</article-title>? <source>PloS One</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>e90287</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0090287</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>C. Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization is considerable at optimal Olsen-p levels for maximized yields in an intensive wheat-maize cropping system</article-title>. <source>Field Crop Res.</source> <volume>209</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2017.04.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>F&#xf6;hse</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Claassen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jungk</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus efficiency of plants II. significance of root radius, root hairs and cation-anion balance for phosphorus influx in seven plant species</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>272</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00010407</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Galvan</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burger</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuyper</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scholten</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in onion roots from organic and conventional farming systems in the Netherlands</article-title>. <source>Mycorrhiza</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>317</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>328</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00572-009-0237-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>S. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Influence of root structure on root survivorship: an analysis of 18 tree species using a minirhizotron method</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Res.</source> <volume>26</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>755</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>762</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11284-011-0833-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haling</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stefanski</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kidd</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sandral</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Differences in nutrient foraging among trifolium subterraneum cultivars deliver improved p-acquisition efficiency</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>424</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>539</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>554</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-017-3511-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hinsinger</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Bioavailability of soil inorganic p in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: A review</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>237</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>195</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1013351617532</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hinsinger</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Plassard</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaillard</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Origins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: A review</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>248</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1022371130939</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Itoh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barber</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus uptake by six plant species as related to root hairs</article-title>. <source>J. Agr Sci-cambridge</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>457</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>461</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500030010x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnston</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poulton</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fixen</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Curtin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus: Its efficient use in agriculture</article-title>. <source>Adv. Agron.</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>228</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-420225-2.00005-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jonathan</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Rightsizing root phenotypes for drought resistance</article-title>. <source>J Exp Bot.</source> <volume>69</volume> (<issue>13</issue>), <fpage>3279</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3292</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Finlay</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil-root interface</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>321</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-009-9925-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kraft</surname> <given-names>N. J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Godoy</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Levine</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Plant functional traits and the multidimensional nature of species coexistence</article-title>. <source>P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>112</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>797</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>802</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1413650112</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kramer-Walter</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bellingham</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Millar</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smissen</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Laughlin</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Root traits are multidimensional: specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>104</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1310</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.12562</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clements</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>How a phosphorus-acquisition strategy based on carboxylate exudation powers the success and agronomic potential of lupines (Lupinus, fabaceae)</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>100</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>288</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.1200474</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martinoia</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Renton</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Plant adaptations to severely phosphorus-impoverished soils</article-title>. <source>Curr Opin Plant Biol.</source> <volume>25</volume>: <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raven</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaver</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age</article-title>. <source>Trends Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>95</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>103</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shane</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cramer</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pearse</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Veneklaas</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Root structure and functioning for efficient acquisition of phosphorus: Matching morphological and physiological traits</article-title>. <source>Ann. Bot-London</source> <volume>98</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>693</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>713</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcl114</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Laughlin</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The intrinsic dimensionality of plant traits and its relevance to community assembly</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>102</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>186</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>193</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.12187</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rengel</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Competition between zea mays genotypes with different root morphological and physiological traits is dependent on phosphorus forms and supply patterns</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>434</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>137</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-018-3616-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eissenstat</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Complementarity in nutrient foraging strategies of absorptive fine roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi across 14 coexisting subtropical tree species</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>208</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>125</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>136</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13434</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biomass partitioning and rhizosphere responses of maize and faba bean to phosphorus deficiency</article-title>. <source>Crop Pasture Sci.</source> <volume>67</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>847</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>856</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/CP16015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lizbeth Lopez-Arredondo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Antonio Leyva-Gonzalez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Isabel Gonzalez-Morales</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lopez-Bucio</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herrera-Estrella</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Phosphate nutrition: Improving low-phosphate tolerance in crops</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>95</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>123</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035949</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Root phenes that reduce the metabolic costs of soil exploration: opportunities for 21st century agriculture</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>38</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1775</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1784</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.12451</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Rhizoeconomics: Carbon costs of phosphorus acquisition</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>269</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-004-1096-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lyu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rengel</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Whalley</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Major crop species show differential balance between root morphological and physiological responses to variable phosphorus supply</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.01939</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McCormack</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dickie</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eissenstat</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fahey</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernandez</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>207</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>505</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>518</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13363</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Messier</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lechowicz</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McGill</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Violle</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Enquist</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Interspecific integration of trait dimensions at local scales: The plant phenotype as an integrated network</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>105</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1775</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1790</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.12755</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Milla</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morente-Lopez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miguel Alonso-Rodrigo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin-Robles</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stuart Chapin</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
<suffix>III</suffix>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Shifts and disruptions in resource-use trait syndromes during the evolution of herbaceous crops</article-title>. <source>P. Roy Soc. B-Biol Sci.</source> <volume>281</volume>, <page-range>1471&#x2013;2954</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.2014.1429</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Milla</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osborne</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turcotte</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Violle</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Plant domestication through an ecological lens</article-title>. <source>Trends Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>463</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>469</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riley</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters</article-title>. <source>Anal. Chim. Acta</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bansal</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bohuon</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The carboxylate-releasing phosphorus-mobilizing strategy can be proxied by foliar manganese concentration in a large set of chickpea germplasm under low phosphorus supply</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>219</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>518</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>529</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.15200</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Postma</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dathe</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The optimal lateral root branching density for maize depends on nitrogen and phosphorus availability</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>166</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>590</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>U948</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.113.233916</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Raven</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Westoby</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Costs of acquiring phosphorus by vascular land plants: Patterns and implications for plant coexistence</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>217</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1420</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1427</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.14967</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delhaize</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Plant and microbial strategies to improve the phosphorus efficiency of agriculture</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>349</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>156</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-011-0950-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roucou</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Violle</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fort</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roumet</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ecarnot</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vile</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Shifts in plant functional strategies over the course of wheat domestication</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Ecol.</source> <volume>55</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2664.13029</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delhaize</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Function and mechanism of organic anion exudation from plant roots</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Phys.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>527</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>560</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.527</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tibbett</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edmonds-Tibbett</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suriyagoda</surname> <given-names>L. D. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cawthray</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Carbon trading for phosphorus gain: The balance between rhizosphere carboxylates and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in plant phosphorus acquisition</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>2170</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2180</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02547.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schachtman</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ayling</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus uptake by plants: From soil to cell</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>116</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>447</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>453</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.116.2.447</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rengel</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Role of phosphorus nutrition in development of cluster roots and release of carboxylates in soil-grown lupinus albus</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>248</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1022375229625</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>L. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus dynamics: From soil to plant</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>156</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>997</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1005</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.175232</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jakobsen</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gronlund</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant phosphorus nutrition: Interactions between pathways of phosphorus uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots have important implications for understanding and manipulating plant phosphorus acquisition</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>156</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1050</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1057</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.174581</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Read</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source>Mycorrhizal symbiosis</source> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Placella</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dayde</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernard</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robin</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Journet</surname> <given-names>E. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus availability and microbial community in the rhizosphere of intercropped cereal and legume along a p-fertilizer gradient</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>407</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>134</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-016-2949-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Teng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>R. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Characterization of root response to phosphorus supply from morphology to gene analysis in field-grown wheat</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>64</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1403</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1411</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ert023</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Trouvelot</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kough</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gianinazzi-Pearson</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Mesure du taux de mycorhizationVA d&#x2019;un syst&#xe8;me radiculaire. recherche de m&#xe9;thodes d&#x2019;estimation ayant une signification fonctionnelle</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Physiological and genetical aspects of mycorrhizae</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>GianinazziPearson</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gianinazzi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Paris</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>INRA Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>221</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vance</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uhde-Stone</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allan</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>157</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>423</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>447</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van der Heijden</surname> <given-names>M. G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Selosse</surname> <given-names>M.-A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanders</surname> <given-names>I. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: The past, the present, and the future</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>205</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1406</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1423</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13288</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Porder</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Houlton</surname> <given-names>B. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>O. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Appl.</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/08-0127.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuyper</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rengel</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal impacts on root trait plasticity of six maize varieties along a phosphorus supply gradient</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>448</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>71</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-019-04396-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants</article-title>. <source>Mycorrhiza</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>363</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00572-005-0033-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rengel</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Plasticity and co-variation of root traits govern differential phosphorus acquisition among 20 wheat genotypes</article-title>. <source>Oikos</source> <volume>2021-12-13)</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/oik.08606</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weemstra</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mommer</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Visser</surname> <given-names>E. J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Ruijven</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuyper</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohren</surname> <given-names>G. M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Towards a multidimensional root trait framework: a tree root review</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>211</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1169</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.14003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rengel</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Maize responds to low shoot p concentration by altering root morphology rather than increasing root exudation</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>416</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>377</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>389</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-017-3214-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Tradeoffs among root morphology, exudation and mycorrhizal symbioses for phosphorus-acquisition strategies of 16 crop species</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>223</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>882</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>895</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.15833</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>Z. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>S. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Increased planting density of Chinese milk vetch (<italic>Astragalus sinicus</italic>) weakens phosphorus uptake advantage by rapeseed (<italic>Brassica napus</italic>) in a mixed cropping system</article-title>. <source>Aob Plants</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <elocation-id>plz033</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aobpla/plz033</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rengel</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Increased soil phosphorus availability induced by faba bean root exudation stimulates root growth and phosphorus uptake in neighbouring maize</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>209</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>823</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>831</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13613</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>