Bacillus-based biocontrol beyond chemical control in central Africa: the challenge of turning myth into reality

Agricultural productivity in the Great Lakes Countries of Central Africa, including Burundi, Rwanda, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, is affected by a wide range of diseases and pests which are mainly controlled by chemical pesticides. However, more than 30% of the pesticides used in the region are banned in European Union due to their high toxicity. Globally available safe and eco-friendly biological alternatives to chemicals are virtually non-existent in the region. Bacillus PGPR-based biocontrol products are the most dominant in the market and have proven their efficacy in controlling major plant diseases reported in the region. With this review, we present the current situation of disease and pest management and urge the need to utilize Bacillus-based control as a possible sustainable alternative to chemical pesticides. A repertoire of strains from the Bacillus subtilis group that have shown great potential to antagonize local pathogens is provided, and efforts to promote their use, as well as the search for indigenous and more adapted Bacillus strains to local agro-ecological conditions, should be undertaken to make sustainable agriculture a reality in the region.


Introduction
The importance of agriculture for the development of societies has been demonstrated for several centuries and it employs about 43% of the world's working population (Roser, 2023).In the Great Lakes Countries of Central Africa (GLCCA), referred to in this report as Burundi, Rwanda, and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), agriculture is the main activity employing more than 94%, 46% and 60% of the working population, while contributing to 40%, 30% and 36% of gross domestic product (GDP) in Burundi, Rwanda, and DRC respectively (PND, 2018;Lokuruka, 2020;FAAPA, 2021).However, this sector faces several constraints including low soil fertility and high incidence of diseases and pests leading to food insecurity (Bjornlund et al., 2020).For example, up to 52%, 43% and 38% of children under five in Burundi, DRC and Rwanda respectively are malnourished (Lokuruka, 2020;WFP, 2021;FAO, 2023).In the GLCCA, plant diseases and pests are generally controlled by chemical pesticides, especially those affecting cash crops such as coffee, cotton, tomatoes, potatoes, vegetables, and fruits (Niyongere et al., 2015;Muliele et al., 2018;Okonya et al., 2019a).However, some phytopathogens are inefficiently managed by traditional practices, such as the use of plant extracts, while others are not controlled (Rutikanga, 2015;MINAGRI-Burundi, 2018;Korangi Alleluya et al., 2021).
Biocontrol products are the most promoted tools within the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) framework, as they are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) compared to chemical pesticides (Raveau et al., 2020).Biocontrol products include biochemicals (semiochemicals, plant extracts, plant growth regulators and organic acids), macroorganisms (insects, mites, and nematodes) and microorganisms (beneficial bacteria, fungi, protozoa, viruses, yeasts) and their derivatives (cyclic lipopeptides, enzymes, chitosan oligopolysaccharides, etc…) (DunhamTrimmer, 2023).Among microorganisms, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), including species of the Streptomyces, Paenibacillus, Pseudomonas and Bacillus genera, are the most commercially exploited for crop bioprotection, notably due to their efficient production of an arsenal of bioactive secondary metabolites (BSMs).These bacteria protect plants through direct antibiosis, competition with other pathogenic microbes for space and nutrients, and via their potential to induce plant systemic resistance (ISR) (Beneduzi et al., 2012;Wang et al., 2021;Dimkicé t al., 2022).Bacillus-based products dominate the biocontrol market compared to their PGPR counterparts (DunhamTrimmer, 2023;Helepciuc and Todor, 2023) due to their ability to form resistant endospores, allowing stable formulations and ensuring long-term survival in the environment, especially in the current climate change context (Radhakrishnan et al., 2017;Miljakovicé t al., 2020).In this review, we provide a detailed topography of plant health and crop protection in the GLCCA, address constraints within the sector, and propose promising sustainable solutions.An overview of biological alternatives to chemical pesticides is discussed, with a focus on Bacillus PGPR for potential integration as biocontrol ingredients into local agricultural systems.

Diversity of phytopathogens and their control
We performed a comprehensive survey of the major diseases and causal agents affecting crop production in the GLCCA region by compiling data from published studies (articles and books) with those obtained from governmental and non-governmental agencies in the form of reports, newspapers, or online databases.Either in the field or in storage, agricultural crops are mainly affected by microbial pathogens consisting of fungi, oomycetes, bacteria, and viruses (Table 1).The most important fungal diseases encompass late blight of potato and tomato caused by Phytophthora infestans, angular leaf spot of bean caused by Pseudocercospora griseola, early blight of tomato caused by Alternaria solani, stem rot caused by Sclerotium rolfsii, late and early leaf spot caused by Nothopassalora personata and Cercospora arachidicola on peanut.These pathogens are most commonly controlled with the chemical mancozeb or its derivatives.Metalaxyl, benomyl, iprobenfos, and copper (II) chloride and metalaxyl are other important fungicides used in the region.One of the most common bacterial diseases prevailing in the region is Xanthomonas wilt of banana caused by X. campestris pv.musacearum, but unfortunately there is no effective pesticide available to control this pathogen (Table 1).Viral plant pathogens responsible for cassava mosaic disease, cassava brown streak disease, banana bunchy top disease and maize lethal necrosis, also cause serious threat to food security in the region but here again, no efficient chemical control is available.

Limitations in local regulation of phytosanitary products and associated risks
Pesticide on the market must be regularly reconsidered by the relevant registration authorities and subsequently included in a list of approved or banned products.The aim is to ensure the quality, efficacy and safety of the chemicals used.However, there are some specific features of the management of pesticides in the GLCCA region that deserve special attention.First, many chemical pesticides banned in the European Union (EU Food Safety, 2023) are still officially registered in the GLCCA countries, representing up to 30% (Table 2) of the total number of products legally distributed (Table S1).It includes the highly hazardous but most commonly used fungicide mancozeb and the insecticides imidacloprid, acephate and dimethoate banned in EU (Lewis et al., 2016).Furthermore, some ingredients such as endosulfan and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, which have been officially discarded by governments in the GLCCA region, are still available in local markets (Ngweme et al., 2019;Bassily, 2022).Second, malpractices in the handling of chemical pesticides are common, either among traders or end-users such as farmers or industrial workers.These malpractices include the sale of adulterated products, failure to use personal protective equipment, incorrect dosage and selection of products, and application at inappropriate times (Wipfler and ter Host, 2018;Okonya et al., 2019b;Balasha et al., 2023).One of the consequences is that residues of pesticides have been found at toxic levels in crops and vegetables such as tomato and amaranth (Kavatsurwa et al., 2014;Ngweme et al., 2021;Ndisanze et al., 2022).
Consequently, some acute symptoms and even death of humans and animals due to pesticide poisoning have been reported in the region.These symptoms include reddened eyes, itchy skin, teary eyes, burning eyes, runny nose, headache, difficulty breathing, and heavy sweating (Ndayambaje et al., 2019;Okonya et al., 2019b;Balasha et al., 2023).Chronic effects of pesticide exposure, including cancer, infertility, and neurological problems (Mahmood et al., 2016), may be a reality in the region or may occur in the near future, although no official survey has been conducted to date.Several reasons may explain this chaotic situation in the region such as poverty, ignorance, and illiteracy among users (Niyongere et al., 2015;Muliele et al., 2018;Ndayambaje et al., 2019;Balasha et al., 2023), inadequate governance in the pesticide sector, and possible socio-economic influence of agrochemical companies on officials (Gaberell and Viret, 2022).

Non-biological alternatives to chemical pesticides in GLLCA
The adverse effects of chemical pesticides have prompted the worldwide scientific community and policy makers to search for alternatives and promote the so-called IPM, which is defined as a holistic approach that aims to control plant pests and diseases by mobilizing all existing methods while reducing reliance on chemicals (Stenberg, 2017).IPM promotes the development of non-biological strategies such as prevention, monitoring, and rational use of chemical phytoprotectants products, and the implementation of biological control methods, which will be discussed later.
Good agricultural practices are preventive measures consisting, for example, in the use of certified varieties, crop rotation, field sanitation and balanced fertilization.These practices have been adopted to some extent in the GLCCA region and promising results have been obtained.For example, cassava mosaic disease and maize streak disease have been controlled using resistant varieties (Legg et al., 2006;Nkurunziza et al., 2012).The banana bunchy top disease has recently been reduced via macro-and micropropagation of healthy suckers (Niyongere et al., 2013;Tchatchambe et al., 2019;Paka et al., 2021).The incidence of banana Xanthomonas wilt and potato bacterial wilt caused by R. solani has been limited via crop rotation, field sanitation, sterilization of farm tools, and avoidance of their exchange (Harahagazwe et al., 2007;Ndayihanzamaso et al., 2016;Uwamahoro et al., 2020).However, despite many attempts involving certified varieties or other agricultural practices, no substantial results have been achieved to control fungal diseases in the region using these approaches.Moreover, implementation of good agricultural practices is unfortunately hampered by several factors, including demographic pressure on arable land, the relative time required to develop new varieties, the lack of durability of resistance in developed varieties, and the consequences of climate change in the agro-ecological context (Pandit et al., 2022).
Phytosanitary products must be used in a rational way, taking into account the epidemiological factors of the specific pathogens, which are usually obtained from accurate field monitoring.Where chemicals are irreplaceable, careful consideration must be given to the dose applied and the less toxic products must be favored.For example, flupyradifurone has been proposed to replace the insecticide imidacloprid (Maloney et al., 2020) and copper hydroxide in substitution of mancozeb (FPS Health, 2023) in EU.Unfortunately, this practice is less widespread in the region, where the choice of pesticide is made at random without prior information on the disease status and on recommended products for optimal efficiency.

Implementation of biological control
Biological control is a promising approach for plant protection based on the use of living organisms and/or their derivatives.These include macroorganisms (predatory insects, mites, and nematodes),  S1).

Macroorganisms
Macroorganisms are either predators or parasitoids of the same kind of pathogenic organisms (insects, mites, or nematodes).They are used in the form of eggs, larvae, pupae, or adults to kill or parasitize the target pest (Ramalakshmi et al., 2020;DunhamTrimmer, 2023).Insect predators have been successfully used in the region to control some pests.For instance, Epidinocarpis lopezi isolated in South America, has been used to control the cassava mealy bug (Phenacoccus Manihoti) (Neuenschwander, 2001;Nyabyenda, 2005), while Gyranusoidea tebygi and Anagyrus mangicola have been developed to control the devastating mango mealy bug in Burundi (FAO, 2022).Other common predators could be introduced locally to control a range of pests.Indeed, the green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea), the Malaysian ladybird beetle (Chilocorus nigritus) and the mealybug ladybird (Cryptolaemus montrouzieri) have been reported to be effective in controlling the cotton aphid jassid, peanut thrips, sugarcane scales and coffee and mango mealybugs respectively (Ramalakshmi et al., 2020).

Biochemicals
Biochemicals in the form of plant extracts appear to be the most widely used biocontrol agents in the region.These extracts are prepared from various plant species like Azadirachta indica, Capsicum spp., Allium sativum, Tephrosia spp., Tithonia diversifolia or Ricinus communis and are used as insecticides to control various pests such as S. frugiperda on maize, Tuta absoluta on tomato, Ophiomya phaseoli, Aphis fabae on beans, etc. (Rutikanga, 2015;PES, 2021;Korangi Alleluya et al., 2021).In addition, two plant molecules azadirachtin and pyrethrin, and spinosad from actinomycetes have been registered as insecticides in Rwanda (Table S1).However, the use of these extracts is still globally rudimentary and based on traditional and communitybased knowledge.Moreover, the use of this type of products requires increased land for growing plants to prepare the extracts, which would inevitably compete with staple and cash crops for agricultural land.

Microorganisms
Several microorganisms encompassing bacteria, fungi, and yeasts are commercialized as biocontrol agents.Fungal based agents mainly include the genera Trichoderma, Metarhizium and Beauveria; while yeasts include the genera Pichia, Yarrowia and Saccharomyces.The largest group of worldwide marketed microorganisms are bacteria (up to 75%), dominated by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) of the genera Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Streptomyces (Saeed et al., 2021;Bonaterra et al., 2022;Dimkićet al., 2022).However, these globally adopted microbial-based alternatives are rarely used in the GLCCA region, and mainly as bioinsecticides such as B. thuringiensis sold in the three countries and B. bassiana and T. harzanium only registered in Rwanda.Here, an overview of the PGPR reported in literature with biocontrol activities and their mechanisms of action is presented for their possible integration into local agricultural systems in GLCCA.

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in crop protection
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria are a group of bacteria found mainly in the vicinity of plant roots, the rhizosphere.The plant provides them with nutrients in the form of root exudates, while these bacteria protect the host and promote its growth.These benefits are mediated through various pathways, including biofertilization by nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization, phytostimulation by the production of phytohormones (cytokinin, abscisic acid, auxin, gibberellins, and ethylene), stress tolerance and biological control (Vejan et al., 2016;Anckaert et al., 2021;El-Saadony et al., 2022).PGPR include several species belonging to different genera, namely Rhizobium, Azotobacter, Streptomyces, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Rhodococcus, Paenibacillus, Variovorax, Azosprillum, Bulkholderia, Serratia, Pseudomonas and Bacillus (Caulier et al., 2018).Bacterial strains of the genera Streptomyces, Paenibacillus, Pseudomonas and Bacillus are the best described and have been shown to be effective biocontrol agents against various plant pathogens through their multiple mechanisms of action such as nutrient and niche competition, antibiosis, signal interference and induction of host resistance (Wang et al., 2021).

Competition
Competition for nutrients and niches between pathogens and beneficial microbes is an important factor in limiting disease incidence and severity (Bishnoi, 2015).Indeed, rhizosphere microorganisms compete for a variety of plant root exudates, including sugars, amino acids and organic acids.These exudates also act as chemoattractants for bacteria to plant roots.These beneficial bacteria colonize the root and can inhibit the growth of soil-borne phytopathogenic microbes by competing for nutrients such as glucose, asparagine, and iron (Dutta and Lee, 2022).Besides exudates, competition for iron is the most well-studied mechanism and involves several bacterial siderophores, such as hydroxamates (Pseudomonas spp.), carboxylates (Rhizobium spp.) and catecholates (Pseudomonas spp., Bacillus spp.), which are used to extract iron from insoluble forms and sequester it from other competitors by chelation (Arguelles-Arias et al., 2009;Mazumdar et al., 2020).On the other hand, rhizobacteria outcompete other microbes for space through their ability to form biofilms, which also act as shelter-like against pathogens (Flemming et al., 2016;Singh et al., 2022).

Antibiosis
Antibiosis is a biological process in which antimicrobial substances synthesized by microorganisms inhibit or kill plant pathogens (Fira et al., 2018).These are toxins that interfere with the synthesis of the cell membrane or other metabolic processes of the pathogen and are variable depending on the PGPR species.For example, Pseudomonas spp.are known to produce 2,4diacetylphloroglucinol, phenazine, pyoluteorin, pyrrolnitrin, hydrogen cyanide and a wide range of lipopeptides such as viscosin, amphisin, orfamide, bananamide and sessilin (Wang et al., 2021;Oni et al., 2022).Bacillus spp.produce various cyclic lipopeptides (CLPs), polyketides, dipeptides, RiPPs and volatile organic compounds (Arguelles Arias et al., 2013;Caulier et al., 2019;Anckaert et al., 2021).Streptomyces species are known producers of several antibiotics such as kasugamycin (antifungal and antibacterial), polyoxin B and D, validamycin (antifungal) families (Barka et al., 2016), as well as cyclic lipopeptides such as lipopeptins recently discovered with antagonistic activity against Fusarium oxysporum (Wang et al., 2023).Paenibacillus spp.are another important PGPR, producing mainly polymyxin active against Gram-negative bacteria, fusaricidin with anti-Gram-positive bacteria and antifungal activities (Ali et al., 2021), pelgipeptins and tridecaptins with antagonistic activity against fungi and bacteria (Le et al., 2020;Costa et al., 2022).PGPR also produce lytic enzymes (the so-called cell wall degrading enzymes) such as chitinase, glucanase, cellulase, xylanase, and pectinase, which are known for their antagonistic activities against pathogens (Abdelaziz et al., 2023).

Signal interference
Like other organisms, bacteria live in communities where they communicate to obtain nutrients and perform other metabolic functions.Cell-to-cell communication within bacteria is known as quorum sensing (QS), mediated by several molecules including Nacylhomoserine lactones, oligopeptides and LuxS/autoinducers (De Kievit, 2009;Rodrıǵuez et al., 2020;Wang et al., 2021).QS is important for bacterial phenotype and virulence, biofilm formation and other physiological processes.QS-mediated metabolites from phytopathogenic bacteria can be chemically or enzymatically degraded by so-called quorum quenching (QQ) enzymes such as lactonase, acylase and oxidoreductase produced by some PGPR.This interferes with QS-regulated processes that are crucial for pathogen development (Sikdar and Elias, 2020) and some important bacterial diseases such as Pectobacterium carotovorum, Pseudomonas syringae, Ralstonia solanacearum, Erwinia amylovora have been successfully managed by using this approach (Rodrıǵuez et al., 2020).

Induced systemic resistance
Induced systemic resistance (ISR) is the process by which plants treated with PGPR species or their secreted molecules induce defense genes and develop immunity to subsequent plausible pathogen attack.PGPR-induced ISR is phenotypically similar to the well-studied systemic acquired resistance (SAR), which is activated after a first infection by an incompatible or necrotizing pathogen (Prsǐćand Ongena, 2020).This process is regulated by the jasmonate or ethylene phytohormone pathways, whereas SAR is dependent on the salicylic acid regulation pathway.The main elicitors of ISR produced by PGPR are Acyl-Homoserine Lactones, cyclic lipopeptides, rhamnolipids, N-alkylated benzylamine derivative, siderophores, volatile compounds and other metabolites with antibiotic functions such as 2,4diacetylphloroglucinol and phenazine (Prsǐćand Ongena, 2020;Wang et al., 2021;Zhu et al., 2022).These elicitors act as microbial associated molecular patterns and are perceived by specific transmembrane pattern recognition receptors, as it has been shown for the pathogen triggered-SAR.However, for a successful symbiosis with plant roots, PGPR have evolved to evade or suppress the pattern triggered immunity developed by the plant as the first line of defense (Yu et al., 2022;Seth et al., 2023).This PGPRinduced plant immunity ultimately leads to defense mechanisms such as cell wall reinforcement via deposition of lignin or callose, enhanced production of defense-related proteins (lipoxygenase, glucanase, chitinase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase) and accumulation of phytoalexins as small-size antimicrobial metabolites (Abdelaziz et al., 2023).

Bacillus as successful PGPR for biological control
Bacillus is a rod-shaped, gram-positive and spore-forming bacterium that is widespread in a variety of ecological niches (Yin et al., 2023).Phylogenetically, the Bacillus genus can be broadly divided into two clades, namely the Bacillus cereus group, which includes the well-known and most commercialized bioinsecticide B. thuringiensis, and the Bacillus subtilis group, which includes most of Bacillus strains marketed for the biocontrol of microbial pathogens (Dunlap, 2019;Nikolaidis et al., 2022).Strains in the B. subtilis group are generally recognized as safe and have therefore been used as alternatives to chemical pesticides in agriculture (Etesami et al., 2023).For example, B. licheniformis SB3086 (Ecoguard ® , Novozymes ® , Biofungicide ® , Green Relief ® ), B. pumilus GB34 (GB34 ® , Concentrated Biological Fungicide ® , Ballad ® ), B. velezensis MBI600 (Subtilex ® , Histick N/T ® ), B. velezensis GBO3 (Kodiak ® , Companion ® ), B. velezensis QST713 (Serenade ® , Rhapsody ® ) and B. velezensis FZB42 (Taegro ® , Rhizovital ® ) are among the commercial biocontrol agents from the B. subtilis group (Lahlali et al., 2022;Yadav et al., 2022).These strains are continuously attracting researchers and industrials thanks to their intrinsic ability to form resistant endospores that allow stable formulations, relatively rapid growth on different substrates, and the secretion of a wealth of bioactive secondary metabolites retaining key biocontrol functions (Prasad et al., 2023).The biosynthesis of these biochemicals involves up to 10% of the bacterial genome and includes a huge diversity of compounds produced via non-ribosomal and ribosomal pathways (Grubbs et al., 2017;Borriss, 2020;Yin et al., 2023).
Cyclic lipopeptides are a group of compounds with a fatty acid and peptide moiety that are produced via the non-ribosomal pathway involving a multi-modular enzyme complex (Iqbal et al., 2023).This machinery gives rise to a large chemical diversity with different structures, based on their amino acid sequence or on the length of the fatty acid chain.These metabolites are classified into the heptapeptides surfactins (pumilacidins/lichenisins) and iturins (iturin A, mycosubtilin, bacillomycin) and the decapeptides fengycins (plipastatins); together with their homologues of different alkyl chain lengths (C 12 -C 17 for surfactins, C 13 -C 17 for iturins and C 14 -C 18 for fengycins) (Theátre et al., 2022).They are produced by members of the Bacillus subtilis group and are known to be involved in the induction of resistance in plants (Prsǐćand Ongena, 2020;Dimkićet al., 2022;Mahapatra et al., 2022) and, thanks to their amphiphilic nature, exhibit antimicrobial activities against a wide range of pathogenic microorganisms by penetrating and disrupting the cell membrane of target organisms (Fira et al., 2018;Ngalimat et al., 2021;Puan et al., 2023).
Polyketides are bioactive metabolites synthetized via pathways catalyzed either by the polyketide synthases (difficidins and macrolactins) or by the hybrid polyketide synthases/nonribosomal peptide synthetases (bacillaene) and are structurally composed of an alternation of polyenes and carbonyl groups (Iqbal et al., 2023).They retain consistent antibacterial activity against several phytopathogens either by interfering with protein synthesis or by damaging the bacterial cell wall (Fazle Rabbee and Baek, 2020; Miao et al., 2023;Zhang N. et al., 2023).The siderophore bacillibactin is a catecholate peptide also produced via the non-ribosomal pathway that retains a high affinity for iron.This property is very important in bacterial niche competition, helping bacilli to gain advantage over their competitors by chelating available iron in the environment (Yu et al., 2011).The dipeptide bacilysin is biosynthesized via a typical non-ribosomal pathway not shared by the lipopeptide/polyketide/siderophore trio.It exhibits toxicity against bacteria by blocking peptidoglycan biosynthesis (Borriss, 2015) and against fungi by probably inhibiting fungal glycans in a manner similar to the inhibition of bacterial peptidoglycan synthesis (Han X. et al., 2021).
8 The potential of Bacillus-based biocontrol in the GLCCA region, a myth or reality The market for biocontrol agents based on strains of the B. subtilis group for the control of plant diseases is growing rapidly around the world but no product based on this bacterium is registered in the region.However, some promising preliminary studies using B. velezensis strains to control fungal diseases in Burundi and DRC have demonstrated the potential of these bacteria to adapt to local agro-ecological conditions, which could pave the way for their possible future dissemination and adoption by local farmers.Bacillus velezensis S499, isolated in Ituri/DRC in 1950s (Delcambe and Devignat, 1957), is effective against Fusarium sp. on tomato (65-70% of disease reduction) under field conditions in Burundi, and lipopeptide-mediated ISR is proposed as the main involved mechanism (Nihorimbere et al., 2010).Lipopeptides secreted by the same strain showed high in vitro antagonistic activity against pathogens isolated from maize cob such as Rhizopus stolonifer, Penicillium variable, Fusarium verticillioides.In the same study, S499 was able to efficiently reduce disease severity (39-67%) caused by these fungi in greenhouse and field conditions (Kulimushi et al., 2018).In addition, B. velezensis GA1 and its cyclic lipopeptides played an important role in the control of peanut stem rot disease caused by Athelia rolfsii, providing up to 60% of protection (Korangi Alleluya et al., 2023).
The biocontrol activity of Bacillus has also been demonstrated against important bacterial phytopathogens.For example, the application of B. subtilis to potato plants infected with R. solanacearum reduced the incidence of wilt by about 50% (Elazouni et al., 2019).Tomato bacterial wilt caused by the same bacterium was efficiently controlled by B. methylotrophicus DR-08 due to its secreted metabolites oxydifficidin and difficidin (Im et al., 2019).Bacillus megaterium USB2103 efficiently controlled common bean bacterial wilt caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv.phaseoli through ISR mechanisms (Giorgio et al., 2016).Brown sheath blight of rice caused by Pseudomonas fuscovaginae was successfully controlled (76.6%) by B. amyloliquefaciens Bk7 (Ullah Kakar et al., 2014).Other examples of Bacillus spp. with potential applications in the control of fungal and bacterial diseases for crop protection in the GLCCA are shown in Table 3.

Conclusions
This review summarizes the current phytosanitary situation in the GLCCA region and the possibility of shifting to safer and more environmentally friendly alternatives to chemical pesticides for sustainable agriculture.Several diseases and pests are devastating many crops, leading to the use of chemical pesticides despite their known hazardous nature.Although pesticide regulations exist in the three countries, their implementation is problematic with one third of registered pesticides already banned from market in EU and numerous mishandling incidents.For the sake of the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, governments in the GLCCA need to take urgent action to mitigate the harmful effects of chemical pesticides.The regulatory  systems should be reviewed and updated, and other less toxic pesticides or more sustainable control strategies should be promoted.Inspectors should be increased in number and motivation, and retailers and farmers should be made aware of pesticide regulations and the associated health and environmental risks.
Globally available alternatives inspired by integrated pest management (IPM), including good agricultural practices and biological control, are not widely used and/or in some cases nonexistent.Although a limited number of biocontrol products are registered in the region, their use has yet to become a "reality".Moreover, all available products are used against insect pests but there is no biological solution that has been developed in practical terms to fight highly prevalent fungal and bacterial diseases.Some Bacillus isolates clearly represent promising tools for the control of these microbial diseases, and their inherent ability to form resistant endospores, to grow on poor substrates such as agro-industrial residues in semi-solid systems, and their potential to secrete a vast array of bioactive secondary metabolites (Kumar et al., 2021;Bouassida et al., 2023) would allow designing stable, rich, and affordable formulations of products suitable for the local socioeconomic context.Unfortunately, although some preliminary studies have demonstrated efficacy in controlling some important local pathogens, these Bacillus-based products are still a "myth" for local farmers.Efforts should be directed toward promoting the use of already available Bacillus-based products against endemic pathogens devastating crops in local farming systems.However, bioprospecting for indigenous Bacillus strains that are well-adapted to local agro-ecological conditions and retain strong biocontrol properties should be promoted to ensure sustainable plant disease management in the region.The great potential of indigenous Bacillus strains over the commercial ones has been shown, for example in the management of grapevine trunk disease (Langa-Lomba et al., 2023) and tropical fruit diseases (Reyes-Estebanez et al., 2020).Governments of the GLCCA countries should not only encourage the investment in such biocontrol products, which are virtually absent in the region, but also facilitate their registration and commercialization.The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.The work of FN and GN was supported by the Acadeḿie de Recherche et d'Enseignement Supeŕieur-Commission de Coopeŕation au Developpement (ARES-CDD), Fedeŕation Wallonie-Bruxelles) through the PRD instrument (Title: Vers une agriculture plus performante et durable au Burundi: application de microorganismes pour ameĺiorer la santéet la croissance des plantes).VKA was funded by ARES-CCD through the "Bourse exceptionnelle" program, University of Liège scholarship and by the Schlumberger Foundation Faculty for the Future program.MO is Research Director at the FRS-FNRS (National Fund for Scientific Research) in Belgium.

TABLE 1
Microbial pathogens affecting crop production in the GLCCA region and chemical pesticides used for their control.

TABLE 2
Status of some EU banned chemical pesticides in GLCCA.

TABLE 2 Continued
R, Registered; B, Banned; NI, No Information; NRU, Not Registered but in Use; BU, Banned but in Use.

TABLE 3
Some global success stories of Bacillus isolates (subtilis group) in biocontrol of important crop pathogens reported in the GLCCA.

TABLE 3 Continued
ns, not specified.