<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2024.1434926</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Integrated management strategies increased silage maize yield and quality with lower nitrogen losses in cold regions</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Changqing</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2699258"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tong</surname>
<given-names>Bingxin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>Mengyang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Huasen</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2246016"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Jiqing</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Zhimei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Baoding</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Soil and Fertilizer Management, Zhangjiakou Soil and Fertilizer Station of Hebei Province</institution>, <addr-line>Zhangjiakou</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>College of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Hebei North University</institution>, <addr-line>Zhangjiakou</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Corina Carranca, National Institute for Agricultural and Veterinary Research (INIAV), Portugal</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Yixiang Sun, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Science, China</p>
<p>Kailou Liu, Jiangxi Institute of Red Soil, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Zhimei Sun, <email xlink:href="mailto:sunzhimei@hebau.edu.cn">sunzhimei@hebau.edu.cn</email>; Jiqing Wang, <email xlink:href="mailto:wjq-72@126.com">wjq-72@126.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>22</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1434926</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>19</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>04</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Li, Tong, Jia, Xu, Wang and Sun</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Li, Tong, Jia, Xu, Wang and Sun</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>High-yield and high-quality production of silage maize in cold regions is crucial for ensuring the sustainable development of livestock industry.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>This study first conducted an experiment to select the optimized silage maize varieties and densities using a split-plot design. The tested maize varieties were Xuntian 3171, Xuntian 16, Xunqing 858, and Fengtian 12, with each variety planted at densities of 67,500, 79,500, and 90,000 plants ha<sup>-1</sup>. Following the variety and density selection, another experiment on optimizing nitrogen management for silage maize was carried out using a completely randomized design: no nitrogen fertilizer (T1), applying urea-N 320 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> (T2), applying urea-N 240 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> (T3), applying polymer-coated urea-N 240 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> (T4), and ratios of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 9:1 (T5), 8:2 (T6), 7:3 (T7), and 6:4 (T8). T5-T8 all applied 240 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup>. The yield and quality of silage maize, nitrogen use efficiency and balance, and economic benefits were evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Results showed that Xunqing 858 had significantly higher plant height (8.7%-22.6% taller than the other three varieties) and leaf area (30.9% larger than Xuntian 3171), resulting in yield 11.5%-51.6% higher than the other three varieties. All varieties achieved maximum yields at a planting density of 79,500 plants ha<sup>-1</sup>. Integrated management strategy 7 (T7: Xunqing 858, 79,500 plants ha<sup>-1</sup>, polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N ratio of 7:3) achieved the highest yield of 73.1 t ha<sup>-1</sup>, a 6.1%-58.1% increase over other treatments. This strategy also produced the highest crude protein (11.1%) and starch (19.1%) contents, and the lowest neutral detergent fiber content (50.6%), with economic benefits improved by 10.3%-97.8% compared to other strategies. Additionally, T7 improved nitrogen use efficiency by 15.4%-94.5%, reduced soil nitrate leaching by 4.4%-36.5%, and decreased nitrogen surplus by 7.0%-46.6%.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion and discussion</title>
<p>Comprehensive analysis revealed that the integrated management strategy 7 significantly improved silage maize yield and quality in cold regions while enhancing nitrogen use efficiency and reducing the risk of nitrate leaching, aligning with green agriculture development requirements. These findings will provide vital theoretical insights and practical guidance for high-yield and high-quality silage maize production in cold regions worldwide.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="graphical">
<title>Graphical Abstract</title>
<p>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-15-1434926-g006.tif" position="anchor"/>
</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>silage maize</kwd>
<kwd>variety and density</kwd>
<kwd>nitrogen fertilizer management</kwd>
<kwd>yield and quality</kwd>
<kwd>nitrogen balance integrated management strategy</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="8"/>
<ref-count count="61"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="6366"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Nutrition</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Economic growth and improved living standards had led to a substantial increase in the consumption of dairy and meat products, and this trend continues to increase in the future (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Komarek et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Du et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). For instance, from 2013 to 2022, the per capita consumption of meat and dairy products increased by 35.16% and 30.15%, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">China Statistical Yearbook, 2014, 2023</xref>). However, the sustainable development of livestock husbandry is under threat due to the degradation of natural grasslands caused by overgrazing and drastic climate change, which in turn impacts the meat and milk supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wheeler and von Braun, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Niu et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Silage maize is becoming a good substitute for natural forage because of its economic efficiency (low cost) and excellent nutritional properties (rich in nutrition, highly palatable and digestible) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Guyader et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bilal et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Galeano et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). But now, silage maize production is facing great challenges, including the lack of superior varieties, inappropriate planting density, and suboptimal water and fertilizer management, leading to unstable and lower yields, poor feed quality, and serious environmental pollution. Therefore, it is imperative to develop high-yield, high-quality, cost-effective and eco-friendly silage maize production technology.</p>
<p>Integrated Soil-Crop System Management (ISSM) offers a practical solution for achieving synergistic improvements in yield, quality, and environmental benefits in crop production systems. By utilizing appropriate crop varieties, optimal sowing dates, suitable planting densities, and advanced nutrient and water management strategies, ISSM restructures the entire production process to align with local environmental conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). This approach has demonstrated substantially increase in summer maize grain yield, ranging from 33.0%-86.8%, while simultaneously reducing nitrogen losses by 39.0% to 88.9% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). However, the overall scheme suitable for silage maize that ensures high yield, superior quality and environmental sustainability remains unclear.</p>
<p>High-latitude and high-altitude regions generally serve as crucial bases for the development of the livestock industry. However, these regions face severe challenges, including year-round drought and cold, short frost-free periods, and soil with poor capabilities of retaining water and fertilizer. These factors make it difficult to ensure the yield and quality of silage maize, as highlighted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Yang et&#xa0;al. (2019)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bai et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. Crop yield relies on complex interactions between genotypes, environmental factors (including climate and soil conditions), and agricultural management. Among these, the yield-increasing potential of genotype is an important aspect. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Liu et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> showed that the contribution of variety improvement to grain yield was 111.4&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>. Research by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Kumar et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref> has shown that planting early-maturing varieties of silage maize in high-latitude regions could increase dry matter content, starch content, and organic matter digestibility. However, the current silage maize varieties are generally chaotic and miscellaneous, and the adaptability and resistance of different varieties have obvious differences. Meanwhile, different silage maize varieties have different optimal planting densities because of their different plant types. Evidence points towards plant density as one of the critical indicators in explaining maize yield booms in the USA and other parts of the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Duvick, 2005</xref>). In North America, optimum plant density increased at a rate of 700 plants per hectare per year during 1987-2016 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Assefa et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Furthermore, another study demonstrated that in high-altitude regions, the optimum plant density for silage maize production can be beyond 138900 plants ha<sup>-1</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Fallah and Tadayyon, 2010</xref>). However, under the condition that the density of maize hybrids continues to increase, the light conditions will deteriorate and the yield will decrease. It can be seen that the yield can be effectively improved on the basis of optimizing varieties and cooperating with the best planting density. Thus, the selection of varieties and their optimized density is of great significance to ensure the yield and quality of silage maize in this region. Additionally, sufficient nutrients are required because of higher biomass of silage maize during the whole growth period. In this case, over-fertilization is becoming common in actual production. According to our survey, the conventional nitrogen application rate of farmers in northwest Hebei province of China is as high as 320&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>. Relevant research showed that the nitrate content of groundwater in this region has reached 20~30 mg L<sup>-1</sup>, which is 2~3 times that of the American standard for drinking water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Ru et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Excessive synthetic N fertilization has resulted in severe soil degradation and environmental pollution in agricultural system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Wu et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop an integrated management strategy suited for silage maize production in cold regions.</p>
<p>In conclusion, hypothesizing that the integrated management strategy can improve the yield and quality of silage maize and reduce soil nitrogen loss in cold regions, the objectives of this study are as follows: (1) assessing the influence of the integrated management strategy on the yield and quality of silage maize in these cold regions; (2) elucidating the effects of integrated management strategy on nitrogen use efficiency, nitrogen balance, and economic benefits. The findings of this study will offer vital theoretical insights and practical guidance for enhancing yield and economic returns, promoting efficient resource utilization, and fostering the sustainable development of the livestock industry in these specified regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Experimental site</title>
<p>The experimental site (41&#xb0;28&#x2019;24&#x201d; N, 115&#xb0;1&#x2019;3&#x201d; E, altitude 1450&#xa0;m) for this study was situated at the Comprehensive Experimental Station of the National Forage System in Zhangjiakou, as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>. This area was typically a continental monsoon climate with a frost-free period lasting 100 days. The tested soil was classified as chestnut soil. The chemical properties of tested soil in 0-20&#xa0;cm layer were recorded as follows: Organic matter, 24.6&#xa0;g kg<sup>-1</sup>, alkali-hydrolyzable N, 50.1 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, available P, 13.2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, available K, 130.2 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, and pH, 8.0. The soil bulk density in 0-20&#xa0;cm, 20-40&#xa0;cm, 40-60&#xa0;cm, 60-80&#xa0;cm, and 80-100&#xa0;cm layer was 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.5, and 1.5&#xa0;g cm<sup>-3</sup>, respectively. The total precipitation amounts were 4675.3&#xa0;mm and 3921.9&#xa0;mm, and the average temperature was 17.0&#xb0;C and 17.2&#xb0;C during the growing seasons in 2018 and 2019 (shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Experimental site and climate map. <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold> represent experimental site, temperature and precipitation in 2018 and temperature and precipitation in 2019, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1434926-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Experimental design</title>
<sec id="s2_2_1">
<label>2.2.1</label>
<title>Selection of best silage maize variety and planting density</title>
<p>This experiment involved two factors, viz., maize variety and planting density. The tested four silage maize varieties as main factor included Xuntian 3171, Xuntian 16, Xunqing 858, and Fengtian 12. Three planting densities as sub-factor comprised 67,500 (A1), 79,500 (A2), and 90,000 (A3) plants ha<sup>-1</sup>. Each treatment was repeated in triplicate, with each plot measuring 7&#xa0;m by 4&#xa0;m, totaling 28 square meters. The maize was sown on May 10<sup>th</sup>, 2018, and harvested on October 8<sup>th</sup> of the same year.&#xa0;The application amount of urea (N, 46%), calcium superphosphate (P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, 18%) and potassium sulfate (K<sub>2</sub>O, 50%) were 320&#xa0;kg N ha<sup>-1</sup>, 90&#xa0;kg P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> ha<sup>-1</sup>, and 90&#xa0;kg K<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. Of this, one-third of the urea was used as base fertilizer (applied before sowing), and two-thirds as topdressing (applied at the big trumpet period). Both calcium superphosphate and potassium sulfate were applied as base fertilizers. All other management strategies were consistent with those used in typical high-yield fields.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2_2">
<label>2.2.2</label>
<title>Optimization of nitrogen management in silage maize planting system</title>
<p>Expanding upon the selection of the optimal variety (Xunqing 858) and density (79,500 plants ha<sup>-1</sup>), an experiment was conducted to optimize nitrogen fertilizer management. Eight treatments were arranged in a completely randomized design and repeated in triplicate, which included: (1) no application of nitrogen fertilizer (as control, T1); (2) applying urea-N 320&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> as traditional fertilization according with that in farmers&#x2019; practice (as integrated management 2, T2); (3) applying urea-N 240&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 3, T3); (4) applying polymer-coated urea-N 240&#xa0;kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 4, T4); (5) ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 9:1 (as integrated management 5, T5); (6) ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 8:2 (as integrated management 6, T6); (7) ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 7:3 (as integrated management 7, T7); (8) ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 6:4 (as integrated management 8, T8). Treatments T5, T6, T7, and T8 all applied 240&#xa0;kg N ha<sup>-1</sup>, and all the above treatments contained the same amount of 90&#xa0;kg P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> ha<sup>-1</sup> and 90&#xa0;kg K<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>-1</sup> as basal fertilizers according to the conventional recommended fertilizer rate in the local region. 40% N was applied before planting, and 60% N was applied during big trumpet period. The length and width of each experimental plot was 7&#xa0;m and 8&#xa0;m, respectively. Seeds were sown on May 19<sup>th</sup> and harvested on October 2<sup>nd</sup> in 2019. All other field management practices, such as weed control and irrigation, were consistent with those used in typical high-yield fields.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Sample collection and measurement</title>
<p>The agronomic traits of silage maize were measured at the milk maturity stage. For this purpose, 10 consecutive maize plants were selected from each plot to determine their plant height, stem diameter, and maximum leaf area. The maximum leaf area was calculated according to leaf length &#xd7; leaf width &#xd7; 0.75 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Sezer et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>For the determination of yield and quality of silage maize, two square meters from each plot were randomly chosen at the milk maturity stage, and the silage maize was cut at a height of 3&#xa0;cm above the ground. The harvested maize was weighed on site, and recorded. Approximately 1&#xa0;kg of the mixed sample of chopped was randomly taken for precise weight recording. All plant samples were first oven-dried at 105&#xb0;C for 30&#xa0;min and subsequently at 70&#xb0;C until reaching constant weight. The dried samples were ground. Measurements were then conducted for crude protein content (using the kjeldahl method), acid detergent fiber content (ADF, using acid detergent method), neutral detergent fiber content (NDF, using neutral detergent method), crude starch content (using rotation method), and total nitrogen content (using the kjeldahl method), as detailed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Zeng et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>.</p>
<p>Soil samples from 0-20&#xa0;cm soil layer were collected and then air-dried before sowing to determine the basic physico-chemical properties. Soil organic matter content and alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen were determined using the potassium dichromate-external heating method and alkali-dispersion method, respectively. Available phosphorus and potassium were determined using vanadium molybdenum blue colorimetry method and flame photometry method, respectively. Soil pH was measured using the glass electrode method with a water-to-soil ratio of 2.5:1. At the milk maturity stage of silage maize, post-harvest soil samples were collected randomly from three sites in each plot using an auger (inner diameter 2.0&#xa0;cm) to a depth of 100&#xa0;cm at 20cm intervals. The three samples from each plot at the same depth were thoroughly mixed to form one composite sample per depth and then transported in coolers on ice to laboratory. Fresh soil samples were immediately analyzed for nitrate nitrogen using ultraviolet spectrophotometry, and soil water content was determined after drying at 105&#xb0;C for 24&#xa0;h. Soil bulk density of each layer was measured using the ring knife method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bao, 2000</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Statistical analysis and relevant calculation</title>
<p>The significance among treatments was analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For multiple comparisons, we used Least Significant Differences (LSD) at the 5% level. Data analysis in this study was conducted using Microsoft Excel for computation and OriginPro 2022 for graphical representation.</p>
<p>The formulas used for various calculations are as follows, in line with the methodology described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Zhang et&#xa0;al. (2008)</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow><mml:mtable>
<mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mtext>Plant&#xa0;nitrogen&#xa0;uptake&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>plant&#xa0;dry&#xa0;matter&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>plant&#xa0;nitrogen&#xa0;content&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtable>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Nitrogen&#xa0;use&#xa0;efficiency&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NUE</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>
plant&#xa0;nitrogen&#xa0;uptake&#xa0;from&#xa0;treatments&#xa0;with&#xa0;N&#xa0;fertilizer</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>plant&#xa0;nitrogen&#xa0;uptake&#xa0;in&#xa0;treatments&#xa0;without&#xa0;N&#xa0;fertilizer</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>the&#xa0;application&#xa0;rate&#xa0;of&#xa0;N&#xa0;fertilizer&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mtext>Nitrogen&#xa0;agronomic&#xa0;efficiency&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NAE</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;kg&#xa0;kg</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>the&#xa0;grain&#xa0;yield&#xa0;from&#xa0;treatments&#xa0;with&#xa0;N&#xa0;fertilizer</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>the&#xa0;grain&#xa0;yield&#xa0;in&#xa0;treatments&#xa0;without&#xa0;N&#xa0;fertilizer</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>the&#xa0;application&#xa0;rate&#xa0;of&#xa0;N&#xa0;fertilizer&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mtext>Partial&#xa0;factor&#xa0;productivity&#xa0;of&#xa0;nitrogen&#xa0;fertilizer&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>PFP</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;kg&#xa0;kg</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>the&#xa0;grain&#xa0;yield&#xa0;from&#xa0;treatments&#xa0;with&#xa0;N&#xa0;fertilizer&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>the&#xa0;application&#xa0;rate&#xa0;of&#xa0;N&#xa0;fertilizer&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable></mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mtext>Nitrate&#xa0;nitrogen&#xa0;accumulation&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>the&#xa0;soil&#xa0;nitrate&#xa0;content&#xa0;in&#xa0;the&#xa0;corresponding&#xa0;soil&#xa0;layer&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>mg&#xa0;kg</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>the&#xa0;soil&#xa0;layer&#xa0;thickness&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>the&#xa0;soil&#xa0;bulk&#xa0;density&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>g&#xa0;cm</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mtext>Nitrogen&#xa0;surplus&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Chemical-N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Irrigation-N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Atmospheric&#xa0;deposition-N</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Mineralized-N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Plant&#xa0;remove&#xa0;N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>40</mml:mn>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;cm&#xa0;NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mtext>-N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable></mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>Note: Chemical N refers to nitrogen brought by fertilizer input. The irrigation-N and atmospheric deposition-N are based on the research findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Ju et&#xa0;al. (2006)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Liu et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref>, respectively. Mineralized-N refers to the amount of nitrogen absorbed by plants under the condition of no fertilization.</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Output&#xa0;value&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>$</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>yield&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>t&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>unit&#xa0;price&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>$</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;t</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mtext>Economic&#xa0;benefit&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>$</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>output&#xa0;value&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>$</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>fertilizer&#xa0;cost&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>$</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>other&#xa0;costs&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>$</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow></mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>Note: The expenses of fertilizers, the price of fresh grass, and other costs including irrigation, labor, pesticides, and machinery were calculated in accordance with the prevailing market prices of 2019.</p>
<p>To comprehensively evaluate the effects of different management strategies, the data pertaining to yield, crude protein, nitrogen uptake, nitrogen use efficiency, nitrogen surplus, and economic benefit were all standardized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) according to the formula <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>x</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mtext>x</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Std</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. Among this formula, <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im2">
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mtext>x</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> stands for average and Std stands for standard deviation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Effect of variety and density on yield and agronomic traits of silage maize</title>
<p>The yield, plant height, stem diameter, and leaf area of silage maize were significantly influenced by both variety and density. However, the interaction between these two factors only has a significant effect on leaf area, as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A&#x2013;D</bold>
</xref>. Among the four examined varieties, Xunqing 858 exhibited a significantly higher yield by 11.5%-51.6% than the other varieties. Moreover, the yield of all varieties initially increased with planting density, but subsequently decreased, and reaching its peak value at a planting density of A2 (79,500 plants ha<sup>-1</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of variety and density on yield and agronomic traits of silage maize. Panels <bold>(A-D)</bold> represent yield, plant height, stem diameter, and leaf area, respectively. A1, A2 and A3 represent planting densities of 67,500, 79,500 and 90,000 plants ha<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate that different densities of the same variety have significant differences at the level of 0.05, and different uppercase letters indicate that different varieties have significant differences at the level of 0.05. ** and * represent significance at the 0.01 and 0.05 probability level, respectively, and ns represents no significance at the 0.05 probability level. No application of nitrogen fertilizer (as control, T1); Applying urea-N 320&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> according with that in farmers&#x2019; practice (as integrated management 2, T2); Applying urea-N 240&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 3, T3); Applying polymer-coated urea-N 240&#xa0;kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 4, T4); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 9:1 (as integrated management 5, T5); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 8:2 (as integrated management 6, T6); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 7:3 (as integrated management 7, T7); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 6:4 (as integrated management 8, T8).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1434926-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Concerning agronomic traits, it was observed that the plant height, stem diameter, and leaf area of silage maize progressively diminished as the planting density increased, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2B&#x2013;D</bold>
</xref>. The stem diameter showed no significant differences among the four varieties. Xunqing 858 was distinguished by having the tallest plants and the largest leaf area. In comparison to the other varieties, the plant height of Xunqing 858 was significantly greater by 8.7%-22.6%, and its leaf area was substantially larger by 30.9% than that of Xuntian 3171.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Effect of integrated management strategies on yield and quality of silage maize</title>
<p>Compared to other treatments, the T7 treatment had the higher yield and crude protein content of silage maize, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>. Treatment 1 without nitrogen fertilizer had the lowest yield at 46.2&#xa0;t ha<sup>-1</sup>, which was significantly lower by 27.1%-36.7% than that of other fertilization treatments. T3 and T4 did not show a significant decrease in yield compared to T2, even with a reduced nitrogen application of 80&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>. Under the total nitrogen application rate at 240&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, the T7 treatment achieved the highest yield at 73.1&#xa0;t ha<sup>-1</sup>, which significantly higher than the other treatments by 6.1% to 58.1%. Furthermore, T7 also had the highest crude protein content at 11.1% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>), the highest starch content at 19.1% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold>
</xref>), the lowest acid detergent fiber at 25.9% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold>
</xref>) and the lowest neutral detergent fiber at 50.6% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3E</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of different management strategies on yield and quality of silage maize. Panels <bold>(A-E)</bold> represent yield, crude protein, starch, acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate the significant differences at the level of 0.05. No application of nitrogen fertilizer (as control, T1); Applying urea-N 320&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> according with that in farmers&#x2019; practice (as integrated management 2, T2); Applying urea-N 240&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 3, T3); Applying polymer-coated urea-N 240&#xa0;kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 4, T4); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 9:1 (as integrated management 5, T5); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 8:2 (as integrated management 6, T6); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 7:3 (as integrated management 7, T7); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 6:4 (as integrated management 8, T8).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1434926-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Effect of integrated management strategies on nitrogen use efficiency</title>
<p>As the proportion of polymer-coated urea-N was reduced, the plant nitrogen uptake, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), nitrogen partial factor productivity (PFP<sub>N</sub>), and nitrogen agronomic efficiency (NAE) exhibited an initial increase followed by a decrease, as detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. The T7 treatment displayed the highest values in all these parameters. Specifically, the plant nitrogen uptake reached 200.5&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, increased by 4.9%-51.7% compared to T1-T8, and its NUE was at 28.4%, PFP<sub>N</sub> and NAE were recorded at 58.8% and 18.2&#xa0;kg kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. These figures underscore T7&#x2019;s superior performance in terms of nitrogen utilization efficiency.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of different management strategies on nitrogen use efficiency of silage maize.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Plant nitrogen uptake<break/>(kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Nitrogen use efficiency (%)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Partial factor productivity of N fertilizer (kg kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Nitrogen agronomic <break/>efficiency (kg kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">132.2 &#xb1; 5.14 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">178.9 &#xb1; 4.58 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.6 &#xb1; 1.81 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39.9 &#xb1; 0.57 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.5 &#xb1; 0.57 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">183.0 &#xb1; 3.35 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.1 &#xb1; 1.16 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54.0 &#xb1; 0.93 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.4 &#xb1; 0.93 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">180.7 &#xb1; 2.42 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.2 &#xb1; 2.69 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53.5 &#xb1; 0.39 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.9 &#xb1; 0.39 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">186.4 &#xb1; 2.62 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.6 &#xb1; 3.20 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54.2 &#xb1; 0.17 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.7 &#xb1; 0.17 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">191.2 &#xb1; 3.68 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.6 &#xb1; 2.31 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56.7 &#xb1; 2.51 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.1 &#xb1; 2.51 ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">200.5 &#xb1; 10.72 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.4 &#xb1; 2.35 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.8 &#xb1; 3.51 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.2 &#xb1; 3.51 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">182.0 &#xb1; 2.64 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.7 &#xb1; 2.67 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54.3 &#xb1; 0.80 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.7 &#xb1; 0.80 b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Different lowercase letters indicate the significant differences at the level of 0.05. No application of nitrogen fertilizer (as control, T1); Applying urea-N 320&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> according with that in farmers&#x2019; practice (as integrated management 2, T2); Applying urea-N 240&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 3, T3); Applying polymer-coated urea-N 240&#xa0;kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 4, T4); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 9:1 (as integrated management 5, T5); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 8:2 (as integrated management 6, T6); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 7:3 (as integrated management 7, T7); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 6:4 (as integrated management 8, T8).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Effect of integrated management strategies on soil nitrate nitrogen accumulation</title>
<p>Significant differences were observed in the accumulation of nitrate nitrogen among different soil layers and treatments. Compared to the unfertilized control (T1), all fertilizer treatments significantly increased the accumulation of nitrate nitrogen in the 0-100&#xa0;cm soil layer. However, different optimized nitrogen management strategies resulted in a reduction of nitrate nitrogen accumulation in the deeper soil layer of 40-100&#xa0;cm, as indicated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>. Notably, even with the nitrogen application rate of 320&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> in T2, there was no significant difference in nitrate nitrogen accumulation in the 0-40&#xa0;cm layer compared to T3, T4, and T5, where nitrogen was reduced by 80&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>. In the 0-40&#xa0;cm layer, the accumulation of nitrate nitrogen in T6, T7, and T8 was significantly higher than that in other treatments, but the differences among these three were not significant. In the 40-100&#xa0;cm soil layer, T2 exhibited the highest accumulation of nitrate nitrogen at 52.4&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>. However, there was no significant difference among T3 to T7 treatments. Importantly, T7 showed the lowest accumulation of nitrate nitrogen (33.3&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>), effectively reducing the risk of nitrate leaching.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of different management strategies on soil nitrate nitrogen accumulation. Different lowercase letters indicate the significant differences among different treatments in the same soil layer at the level of 0.05. No application of nitrogen fertilizer (as control, T1); Applying urea-N 320&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> according with that in farmers&#x2019; practice (as integrated management 2, T2); Applying urea-N 240&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 3, T3); Applying polymer-coated urea-N 240&#xa0;kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 4, T4); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 9:1 (as integrated management 5, T5); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 8:2 (as integrated management 6, T6); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 7:3 (as integrated management 7, T7); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 6:4 (as integrated management 8, T8).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1434926-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Nitrogen balance</title>
<p>Chemical nitrogen fertilizer is the predominant nitrogen input in agricultural fields, contributing to more than 60% of the total nitrogen input (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Among all evaluated fertilizer treatments, T7 had the lowest nitrogen surplus at 115.1&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, which was 7.0% to 46.6% lower than that of the other fertilizer treatments. Additionally, T7 also had the highest total nitrogen output, recorded at 283.0&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>. This output was 3.2% to 12.5% higher compared to the other fertilization treatments, underscoring its efficiency in nitrogen utilization.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of different management strategies on nitrogen balance in soil-maize system (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Item</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">T1</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">T2</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">T3</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">T4</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">T5</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">T6</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">T7</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">T8</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="center">Input</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Chemical N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">320</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">240</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">240</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">240</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">240</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">240</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Irrigation water N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Atmospheric N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mineralized N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">132.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">132.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">132.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">132.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">132.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">132.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">132.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">132.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Output</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Plant remove N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">132.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">178.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">183.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">180.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">186.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">191.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">200.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">182.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0-40 cm NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2013;</sup>N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">83.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">68.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">72.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">72.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">81.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">82.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">92.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Total input</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">158.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">478.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">398.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">398.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">398.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">398.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">398.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">398.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Total output</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">160.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">262.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">251.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">253.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">258.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">272.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">283.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">274.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Nitrogen surplus</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-2.1 e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">215.5 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">146.6 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">145.1 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">139.3 bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">125.9 cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">115.1 d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">123.8 d</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Different lowercase letters indicate the significant differences at the level of 0.05. No application of nitrogen fertilizer (as control, T1); Applying urea-N 320&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> according with that in farmers&#x2019; practice (as integrated management 2, T2); Applying urea-N 240&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 3, T3); Applying polymer-coated urea-N 240&#xa0;kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 4, T4); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 9:1 (as integrated management 5, T5); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 8:2 (as integrated management 6, T6); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 7:3 (as integrated management 7, T7); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 6:4 (as integrated management 8, T8).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Economic benefits of integrated management strategies</title>
<p>The T7 treatment demonstrated significantly higher economic benefits compared to the other treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). In terms of output value, T7 achieved the highest value at 5102 $ ha<sup>-1</sup>, which was significantly greater than that in other treatments (T1-T5) by 8.5% to 58.1%. However, there was no significant difference in output value among T2, T3, T4, and T5. In the aspect of economic benefit, T1 had the lowest net income at 1565 $ ha<sup>-1</sup>, whereas T7 had the highest net income at 3094 $ ha<sup>-1</sup>, and the net incomes among T2, T3, and T4 treatments did not show significant differences. Among the treatments with different ratios of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N (T5-T8), the fertilizer cost for T7 and T8 was comparatively lower.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of different management strategies on the economic benefit of silage maize ($ ha<sup>-1</sup>).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Fertilizer cost</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Other costs</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Output value</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Economic benefit</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">197</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1466</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3228 &#xb1; 165 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1565 &#xb1; 165 d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">508</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1466</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4582 &#xb1; 303 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2608 &#xb1; 303 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">430</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1466</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4702 &#xb1; 151 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2806 &#xb1; 151 ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">590</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1466</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4524 &#xb1; 159 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2468 &#xb1; 159 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">574</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1466</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4430 &#xb1; 250 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2390 &#xb1; 250 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">558</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1466</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4807 &#xb1; 189 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2783 &#xb1; 189 abc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">542</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1466</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5102 &#xb1; 183 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3094 &#xb1; 183 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">T8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">526</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1466</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4770 &#xb1; 254 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2779 &#xb1; 254 abc</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Different lowercase letters indicate the significant differences at the level of 0.05. No application of nitrogen fertilizer (as control, T1); Applying urea-N 320&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> according with that in farmers&#x2019; practice (as integrated management 2, T2); Applying urea-N 240&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 3, T3); Applying polymer-coated urea-N 240&#xa0;kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 4, T4); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 9:1 (as integrated management 5, T5); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 8:2 (as integrated management 6, T6); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 7:3 (as integrated management 7, T7); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 6:4 (as integrated management 8, T8).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Effect of integrated management strategies on yield and quality of silage maize</title>
<p>Selecting excellent varieties, optimizing planting density and applying optimized fertilizer management are necessary measures for improving the quality and yield of maize (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cardwell, 1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Our results demonstrated that the integrated management strategy 7 had the highest silage maize yield (73.1&#xa0;t ha<sup>-1</sup>), with an increase of 6.1%-58.1% compared to other treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>). The primary reason for this yield increase is that favorable plant traits promote the biomass formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Dong et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). In this study, Xunqing 858 exhibited a distinct advantage in plant height and leaf area. Its plant height was significantly higher than other varieties by 8.7%-22.6%, and its leaf area was significantly higher than Xuntian 3171 by 30.9% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2B, D</bold>
</xref>). This may be attributed to the strong adaptability and stress resistance of Xunqing 858 under unique climatic conditions characterized by low temperature and a short frost-free period. Additionally, a suitable planting density created a favorable population structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Borr&#xe1;s et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Assefa et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Piao et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>), enhanced crop light utilization, and ultimately coordinated individual and population yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Li et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The integrated management strategies for silage maize not only affected yield but also impacted its nutritional value. This study found that the integrated management strategy 7 increased crude protein and starch content by 0.2%-21.5% and 0.6%-7.3% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3B, C</bold>
</xref>) compared to other treatments, respectively. This is mainly due to the optimized treatment increasing nitrate nitrogen accumulation in 0-40&#xa0;cm soil layer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>) and effectively increasing plant nitrogen uptake by 4.9%-51.7% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). These factors promoted the accumulation of enzymatic protein and photosynthesis in plants, leading to quality improvements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Effect of integrated management strategies on nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen balance</title>
<p>Poor management on water and fertilizer during the silage maize production not only leads to the wastage of nutrient resources but also contributes to nitrogen losses and decreases the nitrogen use efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Kang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Srivastava et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In recent years, improving nitrogen use efficiency by regulating or altering the transformation or release characteristics of nitrogen fertilizer applied to soil has become a prominent research topic domestically and internationally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sim et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). However, the nutrient transformation and release characteristics of commonly used slow-released fertilizers are affected by soil temperature, humidity and other factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Tlustos and Blackmer, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Husby et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Ransom et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Previous studies had shown that the integrated management strategies have a positive impact on nitrogen use efficiency and environmental effects in the plant-soil system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Similar results were founded in this study. During the harvest of silage maize, the nitrogen surplus in T7 decreased by 7.0-46.6% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>) compared to other management strategies. The main reason was that, under the condition of equal total nitrogen rate of input items, the nitrogen taken up by plants and nitrate nitrogen in 0-40&#xa0;cm soil were higher in the nitrogen balance output in integrated management strategy 7. Simultaneously, through effectively regulating the soil nitrogen supply and increasing the nitrate accumulation in 0-40&#xa0;cm soil, the reasonable ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N in the integrated management strategy 7 (7:3) met the sustained nitrogen demand during the early and later growth stages of silage maize, resulting in higher nitrogen use efficiency. Compared to other treatments, the nitrogen use efficiency, partial factor productivity of N fertilizer and nitrogen agronomic efficiency of T7 increased by 15.4%-94.5%, 3.7%-47.4% and 13.0%-91.6%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Application opportunities and barriers of integrated management strategy</title>
<p>Against the backdrop of increasing pressure on feed supply and environmental resources, achieving further improvement in silage maize yield and quality, as well as environmental protection, poses significant challenges in the development of livestock industry in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Randby et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Integrated management strategies, through optimizing crop varieties and densities and employing a balanced combination of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N, provide a practical approach to address the issues of low and unstable yield and quality, as well as nitrogen excess in silage maize production in cold regions, while reducing environmental pollution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). However, there are still many obstacles and challenges to applying and promoting these management strategies. Firstly, in terms of personnel allocation, China&#x2019;s agriculture is primarily operated by millions of small-scale farmers, which poses a significant challenge to the widespread implementation of integrated management technologies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Spielman et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cui et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Yin et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Secondly, in terms of the controllability of technology, rural areas, especially in cold regions, are sparsely populated and unattractive to young generations, making it difficult to adopt new technologies or production transformations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Lastly, in terms of economic factors, technology cost is an important driving factor in determining the implementation of this technology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Dreher et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Due to the high labor cost of fertilization, farmers are increasingly inclined to apply all fertilizers before sowing (without top dressing). Hence, farmers have a great demand for slow-released compound fertilizers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Li et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). However, the technology recommended in this study requires a reasonable proportion of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N, which increases the difficulty of popularization.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Comprehensive evaluation of different management strategies. No application of nitrogen fertilizer (as control, T1); Applying urea-N 320&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> according with that in farmers&#x2019; practice (as integrated management 2, T2); Applying urea-N 240&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 3, T3); Applying polymer-coated urea-N 240&#xa0;kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> (as integrated management 4, T4); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 9:1 (as integrated management 5, T5); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 8:2 (as integrated management 6, T6); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 7:3 (as integrated management 7, T7); Ratio of polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N at 6:4 (as integrated management 8, T8).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1434926-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To implement this effective technology strategy, we should (1) increase technical services to enable farmers to adapt and adopt more knowledge-intensive agricultural practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>); (2) increase institutional support and infrastructure construction, and transfer integrated management technologies to millions of small-scale farmers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). (3) Governments should increase policy support and financial investment in the agricultural sector. Importantly, farmers must receive proper remuneration for using this technology. Additionally, the new technology must be evaluated and receive feedback for end-user, including farmers. Also, the technology can then be further improved and better adapted to the specific agricultural conditions relevant to the end-users, reflecting a bidirectional feedback mechanism via iteration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Shen et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>In summary, concerted efforts from multiple stakeholders are required to conduct sufficient localized studies to achieve widespread application and promotion of these management strategies globally. This is paramount for realizing the green development of livestock industry. The integrated management technology was studied in cold regions in China. However, this idea and the related results can also provide important references for silage maize production in similar regions of other countries. It is only necessary to update management strategies according to local climate and soil properties to promote the sustainable development of the global livestock industry.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The integrated management strategy 7, which optimized silage maize variety Xunqing 858 with a planting density of 79,500 plants ha<sup>-1</sup>, and applied 240&#xa0;kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> with a nitrogen formula ratio of 7:3 (polymer-coated urea-N to urea-N), can effectively increase yield and quality, improve nitrogen use efficiency and economic benefits, as well as reduce soil nitrogen surplus in the silage maize production system in cold regions. However, we acknowledge that there are still planting systematic, technological, personnel and financial barriers to implementing this integrated management strategy, which requires concerted efforts from multiple stakeholders. Nevertheless, the successful application of this strategy will provide valuable insights for promoting the sustainable development of livestock husbandry facing similar challenges worldwide.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>CL: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. BT: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. MJ: Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft. HX: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JW: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. ZS: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD1901004; 2018YFD0200601), National Pastoral Industry Technology System Program of China (CARS-34).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Assefa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carter</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hinds</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhalla</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schon</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeschke</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Analysis of long term study indicates both agronomic optimal plant density and increase maize yield per plant contributed to yield gain</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>4937</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-018-23362-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Assefa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>P. V. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carter</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hinds</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhalla</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schon</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Yield responses to planting density for US modern corn hybrids: a synthesis-analysis</article-title>. <source>Crop Science.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>2802</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2817</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2016.04.0215</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>F. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Fungal communities are more sensitive to nitrogen fertilization than bacteria in different spatial structures of silage maize under short-term nitrogen fertilization</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecology.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <elocation-id>104275</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104275</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <source>Soil agro-chemistrical analysis</source> (<publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>China Agriculture Press</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bilal</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adnan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rehman</surname> <given-names>F. U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hasnain</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Usman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Javed</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Role of silage in agriculture: A review</article-title>. <source>Green Rep.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36686/Ariviyal.GR.2021.02.04.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Borr&#xe1;s</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maddonni</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Otegui</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Leaf senescence in maize hybrids: Plant population, row spacing and kernel set effects</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00002-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cardwell</surname> <given-names>V. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Fifty years of Minnesota corn production: sources of yield increase</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>984</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>990</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400060013x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Reducing environmental risk by improving crop management practices at high crop yield levels</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>265</volume>, <elocation-id>108123</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108123</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>W. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Producing more grain with lower environmental costs</article-title>. <source>Nature.</source> <volume>514</volume>, <fpage>486</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>489</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature13609</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cassman</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matson</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Integrated soil-crop system management for food security</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States America.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>6399</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6404</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1101419108</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>China Statistical Yearbook</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2014, 2023</year>). <source>National Bureau of Statistics of China</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>National Bureau of Statistics of China</publisher-name>. in Chinese.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>W. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers</article-title>. <source>Nature.</source> <volume>555</volume>, <fpage>363</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>366</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature25785</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>F. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Comprehensive evaluation of 12 silage maize varietiesin qiqihar area</article-title>. <source>Seed.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>68</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2023.09.068</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dreher</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khairallah</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ribaut</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morris</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Money matters (I): costs of field and laboratory procedures associated with conventional and marker-assisted maize breeding at CIMMYT</article-title>. <source>Mol. Breeding.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>234</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1022820520673</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Z. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oya</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nguluve</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Silage preparation and sustainable livestock production of natural woody plant</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Science.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1253178</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duvick</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (<italic>Zea mays L.</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Adv. Agronomy.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>83</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>145</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0065-2113(05)86002-X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fallah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tadayyon</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Uptake and nitrogen efficiency in forage maize: effects of nitrogen and plant density</article-title>. <source>Agrociencia.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>549</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>560</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Galeano</surname> <given-names>E. S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orrico</surname> <given-names>M. A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernandes</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Retore</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>M. S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Agronomic aspects, chemical composition and digestibility of forage from corn-crotalaria intercropping</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Science.</source> <volume>159</volume>, <fpage>580</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>588</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0021859621000848</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guyader</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baron</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beauchemin</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Corn forage yield and quality for silage in short growing season areas of the Canadian prairies</article-title>. <source>Agron. Basel.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <elocation-id>164</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy8090164</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sadras</surname> <given-names>V. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Dual-purpose winter wheat: interactions between crop management, availability of nitrogen and weather conditions</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>241</volume>, <elocation-id>107579</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107579</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>T. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Coupling effects of urea types and subsoiling on nitrogen-water use and yield of different varieties of maize in northern China</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>142</volume>, <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2012.12.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Husby</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niemiera</surname> <given-names>A. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Influence of diurnal temperature on nutrient release patterns of three polymer-coated fertilizers</article-title>. <source>HortScience.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>387</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>389</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI.38.3.387</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ju</surname> <given-names>X. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kou</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christie</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen balance and groundwater nitrate contamination: Comparison among three intensive cropping systems on the North China Plain</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollution.</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>High-resolution ammonia emissions inventories in China from 1980 to 2012</article-title>. <source>Atmospheric Chem. Physics.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>2043</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2058</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-16-2043-2016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Komarek</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dunston</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Enahoro</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Godfray</surname> <given-names>H. C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herrero</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mason-D'Croz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Income, consumer preferences, and the future of livestock-derived food demand</article-title>. <source>Global Environ. Change.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <elocation-id>102343</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102343</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Halling</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parsons</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bergkvist</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vogeler</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Dynamics and plasticity of agronomic performance and nutritive quality traits in forage maize at high latitudes</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agronomy.</source> <volume>138</volume>, <elocation-id>126532</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2022.126532</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>L. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Better performance of compound fertilizers than bulk-blend fertilizers on reducing ammonia emission and improving wheat productivity</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environment.</source> <volume>335</volume>, <elocation-id>108018</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2022.108018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Increased maize plant population induced leaf senescence, suppressed root growth, nitrogen uptake, and grain yield</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>1581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1591</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2018.09.0554</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>L. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaghaleh</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamoud</surname> <given-names>Y. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers/MOFs hydrogel with temperature and pH responsiveness for fertilizers slow-release</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Biol. Macromolecules.</source> <volume>191</volume>, <fpage>483</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>491</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.075</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>R. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Genetic gains in maize yield and related traits for high-yielding cultivars released during 1980s to 2010s in China</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>270</volume>, <elocation-id>108223</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108223</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China</article-title>. <source>Nature.</source> <volume>494</volume>, <fpage>459</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>462</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature11917</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Integrated agronomic practices management improve yield and nitrogen balance in double cropping of winter wheat-summer maize</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>221</volume>, <fpage>196</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rong</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Yield and quality of silage corn (Zea mays) as affected by type and quantity of N fertilization</article-title>. <source>Acta Prataculturae Sinica.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11686/cyxb20130607</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Overgrazing leads to soil cracking that later triggers the severe degradation of alpine meadows on the Tibetan Plateau</article-title>. <source>Land Degradation Dev.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1257</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ldr.3312</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Piao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Optimized tillage practices and row spacing to improve grain yield and matter transport efficiency in intensive spring maize</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>198</volume>, <fpage>258</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Randby</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nadeau</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karlsson</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johansen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effect of maturity stage at harvest and kernel processing of whole crop wheat silage on digestibility by dairy cows</article-title>. <source>Anim. Feed Sci. Technology.</source> <volume>253</volume>, <fpage>141</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>152</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.04.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ransom</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jolley</surname> <given-names>V. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blair</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sutton</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hopkins</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen release rates from slow- and controlled-release fertilizers influenced by placement and temperature</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>15</volume>, <elocation-id>e0234544</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0234544</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ru</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Status of the contamination and spatial-temporal variations of nitrate in groundwater of Hebei Province, China</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Resour. Environment.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>48</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13254/j.jare.2013.05.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sezer</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kiremit</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#xd6;zt&#xfc;rk</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Subrata</surname> <given-names>B. A. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osman</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akay</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Role of melatonin in improving leaf mineral content and growth of sweet corn seedlings under different soil salinity levels</article-title>. <source>Scientia Horticulturae.</source> <volume>288</volume>, <elocation-id>110376</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110376</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Q. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cong</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Agriculture green development in China: insights and advances</article-title>. <source>Front. Agric. Sci. Engineering.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>5&#x2013;19</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15302/J-FASE-2024535</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sim</surname> <given-names>D. H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>I. A. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>L. L. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hameed</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Encapsulated biochar-based sustained release fertilizer for precision agriculture: A review</article-title>. <source>J. Cleaner Production.</source> <volume>303</volume>, <elocation-id>127018</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Spielman</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Byerlee</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alemu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelemework</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Policies to promote cereal intensifcation in Ethiopia: the search for appropriate public and private roles</article-title>. <source>Food Policy.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>194</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.12.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Panda</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chakraborty</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Quantification of nitrogen transformation and leaching response to agronomic management for maize crop under rainfed and irrigated condition</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollution.</source> <volume>265</volume>, <elocation-id>114866</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114866</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tlustos</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blackmer</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Release of nitrogen from ureaform fractions as influenced by soil pH</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. America J.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>1807</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1810</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600060026x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Comparison of efficiency-enhanced management and traditional management of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in cotton fields of northwestern China</article-title>. <source>Agriculture-Basel.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1134</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture11111134</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Effect of nitrogen fertilization on corn yield, nitrogen accumulation and physiology index</article-title>. <source>J. Maize Sci.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13597/j.cnki.maize.science.2012.05.027</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>C. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Integrated systematic approach increase greenhouse tomato yield and reduce environmental losses</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Management.</source> <volume>266</volume>, <elocation-id>110569</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110569</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wheeler</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>von Braun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Climate change impacts on global food security</article-title>. <source>Science.</source> <volume>341</volume>, <fpage>508</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>513</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1239402</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luan</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Partial organic substitution for synthetic fertilizer improves soil fertility and crop yields while mitigating N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in wheat-maize rotation system</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agronomy.</source> <volume>154</volume>, <elocation-id>127077</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2023.127077</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>J. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>A dual-purpose model for spring-sown oats in cold regions of northern China</article-title>. <source>Agron. Basel.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>721</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy9110721</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ying</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Calculating socially optimal nitrogen (N) fertilization rates for sustainable N management in China</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environment.</source> <volume>688</volume>, <fpage>1162</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1171</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.398</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xin</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Z. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Silage quality and output of different maize-soybean strip intercropping patterns</article-title>. <source>Fermentation Basel.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <elocation-id>174</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/fermentation8040174</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>W. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement</article-title>. <source>Acta Pedologica Sinica.</source> <volume>05)</volume>, <fpage>915</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>924</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1003-1650.2013.12.074</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>China&#x2019;s agriculture green development: from concept to actions</article-title>. <source>Front. Agric. Sci. Engineering.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>20</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15302/J-FASE-2023512</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evers</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Werf</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Maize yield and quality in response to plant density and application of a novel plant growth regulator</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>164</volume>, <fpage>82</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>89</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ying</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Outlook of China&#x2019;s agriculture transforming from smallholder operation to sustainable production</article-title>. <source>Global Food Security.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <elocation-id>100444</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100444</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Z. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhuo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jing</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Space dynamic change of pasture amount and influence factors analysis in Xilin Gol Grassland</article-title>. <source>J. Earth Environment.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>172</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7515/JEE201602006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pullens</surname> <given-names>J. W. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xf8;rensen</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blicher-Mathiesen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olesen</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xf8;rgesen</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Agronomic and environmental factors influencing the marginal increase in nitrate leaching by adding extra mineral nitrogen fertilizer</article-title>. <source>Agriculture Ecosyst. Environment.</source> <volume>327</volume>, <elocation-id>107808</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2021.107808</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Improving the growth, lodging and yield of different density-resistance maize by optimising planting density and nitrogen fertilisation</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil Environment.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>453</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>460</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17221/178/2020-PSE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Assessment of climate change adaptation measures on the income of herders in a pastoral region</article-title>. <source>J. Cleaner Production.</source> <volume>208</volume>, <fpage>728</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>735</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.088</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>B. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effect of slow-release fertilizer and tillage practice on grain yield and nitrogen efficiency of summer maize (Z.mays L.)</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr. Fertilizer.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>821</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>829</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11674/zwyf.14526</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>