AUTHOR=Hu Ya-Lin , Zheng Zhi-Heng , Qin Chu-Qiao , Leuzinger Sebastian TITLE=Effects of litter input on soil aggregation and aggregate carbon turnover differ among three subtropical forests in southeastern China JOURNAL=Frontiers in Plant Science VOLUME=Volume 16 - 2025 YEAR=2025 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1516775 DOI=10.3389/fpls.2025.1516775 ISSN=1664-462X ABSTRACT=Background and aimsLitter input plays important roles in controlling soil aggregation and aggregate carbon (C) content. However, the effects of litter input on soil aggregate C turnover in different forest types remain unclear.MethodsWe examined the changes of aggregate mass proportion, and the litter-derived and native C content among soil aggregates after three years of aboveground and root litter input, using 13C isotope tracing in a natural forest, a Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolate) plantation, and a masson pine (Pinus massoniana) plantation in southeastern China.ResultsBelowground root litter rather than aboveground litter input enhanced soil aggregation. Litter input increased total C content across all aggregates, and the effects were no different between aboveground litter and belowground root litter input except for the >2 mm fraction. Belowground root litter input led to less native C content across three forest types. However, belowground root litter input resulted in more formation of litter-derived C than aboveground litter input under masson pine plantations, but not for both natural forest and Chinese fire plantation, suggesting a different effect of litter input on the litter-derived C formation among forest types. In addition, forest type affected soil aggregation and aggregate C turnover, and the differences in litter quantity and litter C:N ratio can explain the changes in soil aggregation and aggregate C turnover among forest types.ConclusionOur results imply that belowground root litter input plays a more important role in controlling soil aggregation and aggregate C turnover than aboveground litter, and the impact on newly litter-derived C formation depends on forest type.