ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 28 January 2025

Sec. Crop and Product Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1534625

Differences in carbon and nitrogen metabolism of soft japonica rice in southern China during grain filling stage under different light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions and their relationship with rice eating quality

  • 1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

  • 2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

  • 3. Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

  • 4. Research Institute of Rice Industrial Engineering Technology of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China

Abstract

Light and nitrogen are crucial environmental factors that significantly impact rice growth and quality formation. Currently, there is a lack of systematic research on how light and nitrogen affect carbon and nitrogen metabolism during grain filling, subsequently affecting the eating quality of rice. To address this gap, field experiments were conducted under varying light intensities and nitrogen fertilizer levels to investigate the changes in carbon and nitrogen metabolism during grain filling, the eating quality of rice at maturity, and the relationship between them. The findings revealed that, 50% light intensity suppressed carbon metabolism while stimulating nitrogen metabolism, resulting in a reduction in the C/N ratio, decreased starch content by 4.30% to 5.59%, and elevated protein content by 21.31% to 29.70%, thereby leading to decreased rice eating quality by 10.06% to 11.42%. Conversely, the application of panicle fertilizer boosted nitrogen metabolism while hindering carbon metabolism, leading to a decrease in the C/N ratio, increased protein content by 21.31% to 29.70%, and reduced starch content by1.60% to 2.93%, thereby leading to decreased rice eating quality by 4.13% to 6.71%. Correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between the C/N ratio and carbon metabolism-related enzyme activities and products, along with a significant negative correlation with nitrogen metabolism-related enzyme activities and products, suggesting that the C/N ratio can serve as an indicator of carbon and nitrogen metabolism levels. Further analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between the C/N ratio and taste value, indicating that higher levels of carbon metabolism promote the development of good rice eating quality, while nitrogen metabolism exerts an opposing influence. In summary, notable variances in carbon and nitrogen metabolism were observed within the same japonica rice cultivar under diverse light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions. These metabolic differences impact the synthesis of starch and protein in the endosperm, ultimately influencing rice quality. Our study contributes to a more profound comprehension of the regulation of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in rice by light and nitrogen fertilizer, as well as their role in determining eating quality.

1 Introduction

China is recognized as the world’s largest producer of japonica rice, with the southern rice region serving as the primary cultivation area for japonica rice production in the country. This region is renowned for its high yield per unit area and substantial total output, playing a crucial role in ensuring a stable national food supply (Zhu et al., 2021). Conventional japonica rice varieties grown in the southern regions have historically exhibited poor rice eating quality, characterized by high hardness and low viscosity. However, recent years have witnessed significant advancements in breeding new soft japonica rice varieties with low amylose content in the southern japonica rice regions (Ma et al., 2022; Zhu et al., 2021). In contrast to conventional japonica rice, these new soft japonica rice varieties demonstrate a softer and more elastic texture after cooking, thereby significantly enhancing the eating quality of southern japonica rice (Zhu et al., 2022).

Starch and protein are key determinants of rice eating quality (Li and Gilbert, 2018; Scott and Awika, 2023; Yu et al., 2023), with their synthesis and accumulation being regulated by carbon and nitrogen metabolism during the grain filling stage (Pfister and Zeeman, 2016; Zhang and Fernie, 2023). Thus, modifications in carbon and nitrogen metabolism are critical for the content and composition of starch and protein in rice endosperm, thereby influencing the overall rice eating quality. Previous research has indicated that, beyond rice genotypes, environmental factors such as light and nitrogen fertilizer significantly impact carbon and nitrogen metabolism in rice (Li et al., 2022a; Wei et al., 2018). Insufficient light levels during the grain filling stage result in reduced activity of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase in the leaves, leading to a decline in leaf photosynthetic rate and insufficient accumulation of photosynthetic products (; Wei et al., 2023). Concurrently, the activities of starch synthesis enzymes in grains, including ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, granule-bound starch synthase, and soluble starch synthase, decrease in response to diminishing light intensity (Deng et al., 2018; Li et al., 2022b). This decline results in reduced starch content in the grains, coupled with an increase in long-chain amylopectin (Deng et al., 2021). Moreover, certain investigations have indicated that inadequate light exposure can augment nitrogen accumulation in rice plants, facilitating protein synthesis in grains and consequently elevating the protein content. Nitrogen stands as a vital nutrient essential for rice cultivation. Proper nitrogen fertilizer application has been demonstrated to delay leaf senescence, enhance leaf photosynthetic efficiency, and improve the assimilation and uptake of carbon and nitrogen compounds in plants (Tanaka et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2021a). A previous investigation revealed that the delayed application of nitrogen fertilizer enhances nitrogen absorption by rice plants and augments the leaf net photosynthetic rate. This phenomenon not only boosts nitrogen and non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) accumulation in the stems post-anthesis but also enhances their efficacy in transporting these compounds to the grains. Such processes furnish an ample supply of materials for starch and protein synthesis in the endosperm (Sun et al., 2017). Nevertheless, heightened nitrogen fertilizer application frequently elevates the activities of enzymes involved in protein synthesis in grains, such as glutamine synthetase and glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase, while concurrently suppressing the activities of enzymes associated with starch synthesis. Consequently, this leads to an imbalance in the starch-to-protein ratio within the rice endosperm (Fei et al., 2023; Long et al., 2023).

While previous studies have investigated carbon and nitrogen metabolism during the filling stage and its impact on rice eating quality, most have concentrated on the impact of light and nitrogen fertilizer on carbon and nitrogen metabolism in traditional rice varieties. Additionally, existing research has predominantly examined the response of rice eating quality to individual factors such as carbon or nitrogen metabolism. However, there remains a notable gap in comprehensive research exploring how light and nitrogen fertilizer modulate carbon and nitrogen metabolism in japonica rice during the grain filling stage, particularly in southern soft japonica rice. Furthermore, there is a lack of comprehension regarding how these factors influence the synthesis of starch and protein in the endosperm and the resultant eating quality. To address this research gap, the present study utilized two widely cultivated soft japonica rice cultivars in southern China, namely Nanjing 5718 and Nanjing 9108, as experimental materials and exposed them to different light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions. This investigation explores multiple parameters, including leaf photosynthetic rate, NSC and nitrogen content in stems and grains, starch and protein content in grains, activities of enzymes associated with starch and protein synthesis, and the eating quality of rice across varied light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions. The main objective is to thoroughly elucidate the mechanisms through which light and nitrogen fertilizer modulate carbon and nitrogen metabolism during the grain filling stage of southern soft japonica rice, consequently influencing the synthesis of starch and protein and the eventual eating quality of rice.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials and experimental design

The experiment was conducted from May to November of 2021 at the experimental farm of Yangzhou University. Two widely cultivated soft japonica rice cultivars in southern China, Nanjing 5718 and Nanjing 9108, were selected as the experimental materials. A split-plot design was implemented, with cultivars serving as the main plots and light intensity and nitrogen fertilizer levels as the subplots. During the grain filling stage, two light intensity conditions were established: 100% natural light intensity (L1) and 50% natural light intensity (L2, achieved by shading with black shade nets with a transmittance of 50% from rice heading to maturity). The black shading net was customized by us from a supplier. Additionally, we conducted measurements using a lux meter to confirm its effectiveness in providing 50% shading. In conventional agricultural practices for high-quality and high-yield production in southern China, the application of 270 kg/hm² of pure nitrogen was employed, with a base fertilizer: tillering fertilizer: panicle fertilizer ratio of 3.5:3.5:3. Concerning the nitrogen application rate specified above, two panicle fertilizer levels were established: N1 (189 Kg N/hm² with 94.5 Kg each for base and tillering fertilizer, and no panicle fertilizer) and N2 (270 Kg N/hm² with 94.5 Kg each for base and tillering fertilizer, and 81 Kg for panicle fertilizer). Mechanical rice planting utilized blanket seedlings, with each hill accommodating four seedlings positioned at 30 cm by 12 cm intervals. The tillering fertilizer was administered 7 days post-transplantation, while the panicle fertilizer was applied at the fourth leaf stage from the top for each cultivar. The nitrogen fertilizer (N): phosphorus fertilizer (P2O5): potassium fertilizer (K2O) ratio was maintained at 2:1:2. Phosphorus fertilizer was applied as a single base application, whereas potassium fertilizer was evenly distributed before tillage and at the jointing stage.

2.2 Measurement of photosynthetic characteristics and SPAD

From anthesis to 42 days post-anthesis, designated rice plants that had reached flowering on the corresponding day were selected every 7 days. The net photosynthetic rate of the flag leaf was assessed utilizing a LI-6400XT portable photosynthesis system following the methodology outlined by Ye et al. (2024). Consistent positioning on the flag leaf was maintained for measurements across all treatments. The SPAD values of the flag leaf were determined using a SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter (Konica Minolta, Japan), with the average value being recorded.

2.3 Measurement of non-structural carbohydrates and nitrogen

Rice plants that flower simultaneously were marked, and the flowering period was recorded. Rice plant samples were performed at 7-day intervals from anthesis to 42 days post-anthesis. Subsequently, the rice plant was divided into stem, leaf and panicle. Enzyme inactivation was carried out at 105°C for 0.5 hours, followed by drying at 80°C until a consistent weight was attained. After drying and weighing, the samples were ground for the analysis of starch, soluble sugars, and nitrogen content.

Soluble sugars and starch levels were measured following the methodology outlined by Shouichi Yoshida et al. (1976). A 0.1 g sample was weighed into a 10 mL centrifuge tube, and 8 mL of a prepared 80% ethanol solution was added. The mixture underwent a 30-minute incubation in a water bath at 80°C, followed by cooling and centrifugation. This process was repeated thrice, and the supernatants were pooled for the determination of soluble sugars. The residue was utilized for starch determination. The anthrone colorimetric method was applied at 620 nm to analyze the content of soluble sugars and starch. Nitrogen content was determined using an automatic Kjeltec 8200 instrument (Foss, Hillerød, Denmark).

2.4 Measurement of carbon and nitrogen metabolism enzymes

Rice plants that flower simultaneously were marked, and the flowering period was recorded. Leaf and grain samples were performed at 7-day intervals from anthesis to 42 days post-anthesis. The leaf and grain samples were promptly frozen and preserved at -70°C for subsequent enzyme analysis.

Upon grain shelling, the activities of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS), soluble starch synthase (SSS), starch branching enzyme (SBE), starch debranching enzyme (DBE), glutamine synthetase (GS), and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) were individually assessed. Subsequently, upon the main vein removal from the flag leaf, the activities of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPase) and nitrate reductase (NR) were determined. All enzyme activities were measured in accordance with the protocols outlined in the respective kits provided by Shanghai Enzyme-linked Biotechnology Co., Ltd.

2.5 Measurement of starch, protein, and their components

Rice plants that flower simultaneously were marked, and the flowering period was recorded. Grain samples were performed at 7-day intervals from anthesis to 42 days post-anthesis. The grain samples were air-dried to achieve a moisture content of 14%, after which the quantities of starch, amylose, amylopectin, protein, albumin, globulin, prolamin, and glutelin were assessed.

The total starch content (TSC) was measured utilizing the Total Starch Assay Kit from Megazyme (Bray, Ireland). Amylose content (AC) was determined through the iodine adsorption method. The amylopectin content (APC) was calculated as the difference between TSC and AC. The crude protein content (PC) was analyzed using the Kjeldahl method with a Kjeltec 8200 analyzer (Foss, Hillerød, Denmark). Protein components were evaluated following the procedure outlined by Sapan et al. (1999), with glutelin being determined using a biuret colorimetric method, and albumin, globulin, and prolamin being quantified utilizing the Coomassie Blue colorimetric method (Ma et al., 2024).

2.6 Accumulation of starch, protein, and their components

The accumulation of starch and protein was modeled using the logarithmic equation y=K/(1+ea−bx) (Huang et al., 2019). Subsequently, the pertinent indicators were computed following the methodology outlined by Shi et al. (2012). The mean accumulation rate (MAR) was determined as Kb/(a-loge (100/99-1)).

2.7 Rice eating quality

The cooked rice taste parameters, encompassing appearance and taste value, were evaluated utilizing a rice taste analyzer (STA1A, Satake Corporation, Japan), with the preset detection line configured as “Japanese japonica rice” (Zhu et al., 2021). The rice-to-water ratio was standardized at 1:1.3. Three rice cakes per sample were analyzed, with each side being assessed once.

The hardness, elasticity, and adhesiveness of cooked rice were assessed employing a texture analyzer (TA.XT.Plus, Stable Micro Systems, UK). The probe underwent a controlled descent and retraction at a velocity of 1 mm/s, followed by a repetitive compression cycle (Liu et al., 2021). Each sample underwent six analyses, and the resulting average values were calculated.

2.8 Data analysis

Data processing was carried out using EXCEL 2019, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 software. Graphing and correlation analyses were conducted using Origin 2022 software.

3 Results

3.1 Differences in carbon metabolism and its products under different light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions

3.1.1 Photosynthetic characteristics of flag leaf

Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, the photosynthesis rate of L2 decreased by 13.68% to 16.28%, 13.90% to 16.40%, 19.06% to 20.01%, 21.70% to 22.51%, 23.23% to 25.30%, 25.32% to 28.30%, and 25.80% to 27.10%, respectively, from 7 days to 42 days after anthesis (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Under consistent light conditions, the photosynthesis rate of N2 compared to N1 exhibited an increase ranging from 28.20% to 35.39%, 27.39% to 34.11%, 26.02% to 31.50%, 26.79% to 30.49%, 22.71% to 30.07%, 20.24% to 27.37%, and 20.21% to 26.00%, respectively, from 7 days to 42 days after anthesis.

3.1.2 The content and accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates in stems

Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, the non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) content and accumulation of L2 at the maturity stage decreased by 8.76% to 15.37% and 17.51% to 19.74%, respectively, compared to L1 (Table 1).

Table 1

CultivarTreatmentContent (%)Accumulation (Kg/hm2)
Anthesis stageMaturity stageAnthesis stageMaturity stage
Nanjing5718L1N133.60 ± 0.22a19.51 ± 0.33a1950.14 ± 12.80d984.92 ± 16.67b
L1N231.51 ± 0.14c17.74 ± 0.23b2023.74 ± 9.13b997.14 ± 12.75b
L2N133.31 ± 0.26a17.16 ± 0.52b1914.29 ± 15.22e790.48 ± 23.79e
L2N231.21 ± 0.39c15.01 ± 0.28d1986.01 ± 24.71c810.05 ± 15.16de
Nanjing9108L1N132.71 ± 0.18b17.61 ± 0.34b1967.29 ± 11.08cd1012.83 ± 19.78ab
L1N231.06 ± 0.52c16.34 ± 0.27c2064.06 ± 34.77a1040.13 ± 16.97a
L2N132.72 ± 0.27b16.07 ± 0.49c1938.79 ± 15.57de835.47 ± 25.73cd
L2N229.76 ± 0.32d14.42 ± 0.18e1989.00 ± 21.60c850.98 ± 10.73c

Non-structural carbohydrate content and accumulation in the stems of japonica rice.

Values are mean ± SD (n = 3) and values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

100% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L1N1), 100% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L1N2), 50% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L2N1) and 50% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L2N2).

Under consistent light conditions, the NSC content of N2 at maturity stage exhibited a decrease ranging from 7.22% to 12.53% compared to N1, while the accumulation of N2 at maturity stage showed an increase of 1.27% to 2.70%.

3.1.3 The content of non-structural carbohydrates in grains

Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, the non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) content of L2 decreased by 18.17% to 25.69%, 15.95% to 24.03%, 17.88% to 23.09%, 18.84% to 22.60%, 17.97% to 24.79%, 18.41% to 26.22%, and 20.87% to 29.04%, respectively, from 7 days after anthesis to the maturity stage, in comparison to L1 (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Under consistent light conditions, in comparison to N1, the NSC content of N2 exhibited a decrease ranging from 6.88% to 15.44%, 4.96% to 14.10%, 5.09% to 9.75%, 5.21% to 8.70%, 5.22% to 12.28%, 5.00% to 12.46%, and 4.72% to 12.90%, respectively, from 7 days after anthesis to maturity stage.

3.1.4 Enzyme activities of carbon metabolism in leaves and grains

Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, compared to L1, the levels of RuBPase in L2 leaves exhibited a decrease of 3.77% to 24.03%, while the activities of AGPase, GBSS, SSS, SBE, and DBE in L2 grains decreased by 9.74% to 19.58%, 15.25% to 23.03%, 13.16% to 20.26%, 11.22% to 19.25%, and 7.63% to 18.90%, respectively, from 7 days to 42 days after anthesis (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Under consistent light conditions, in comparison to N1, RuBPase activity in N2 leaves increased by 6.87% to 16.39%, while the activities of AGPase, GBSS, SSS, SBE, and DBE in N2 grains decreased by 2.76% to 10.19%, 5.16% to 10.63%, 4.37% to 10.45%, 7.61% to 13.18%, and 3.53% to 10.89%, respectively, from 7 days to 42 days after anthesis.

3.1.5 Characterization of starch content and accumulation in brown rice

Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, in comparison to L1, the TSC, AC and APC in L2 decreased by 2.82% to 6.25%, 3.62% to 18.06%, and 1.86% to 5.44%, respectively, from 7 days to 42 days after anthesis (Figure 4). Additionally, due to the reduced MAR of starch, amylose, and amylopectin in L2 compared to L1 (Table 2), the TSA, AA, and APA of L2 decreased by 14.19% to 18.59%, 23.01% to 28.56%, and 13.46% to 17.57%, respectively, at 42 days after anthesis (Figure 4).

Figure 4

Table 2

CultivarTreatmentTotal starchAmyloseAmylopectin
MAR
(mg grain-1 d-1)
KR2MAR
(mg grain-1 d-1)
KR2MAR
(mg grain-1 d-1)
KR2
Nanjing5718L1N10.477521.920.996160.06462.200.998870.414119.760.99500
L1N20.436920.810.996810.05501.940.998870.382818.900.99576
L2N10.412318.620.994540.05031.710.999320.362616.970.99394
L2N20.388817.310.988030.04451.510.997840.343215.860.98745
Nanjing9108L1N10.382819.130.994400.04721.830.999180.335917.350.99331
L1N20.354917.930.997410.04021.620.999450.314916.350.99671
L2N10.325116.110.992240.03481.360.997210.290114.790.99115
L2N20.301114.640.993390.02931.150.997800.270613.500.99236

Characteristics of starch accumulation.

Starch accumulation was modeled using the logarithmic equation y=K/(1+ea−bx). K, the max accumulation. R2, determination coefficient of the equation. Mean accumulation rate (MAR). 100% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L1N1), 100% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L1N2), 50% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L2N1) and 50% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L2N2).

Under consistent light conditions, in comparison to N1, the TSC, AC, and APC in N2 decreased by 1.28% to 3.50%, 0.96% to 9.31%, and 0.68% to 2.95%, respectively, from 7 days to 42 days after anthesis. Similarly, reflecting the lower MAR of starch, amylose, and amylopectin in N2 compared to N1, the TSA, AA, and APA of N2 decreased by 5.94% to 8.73%, 11.54% to 14.23%, and 6.24% to 8.20%, respectively, at 42 days after anthesis.

3.2 Differences in nitrogen metabolism and its products under different light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions

3.2.1 SPAD of flag leaf

Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, compared to L1, SPAD of L2 increased by 8.40% to 12.19%, 11.31% to 14.71%, 13.01% to 14.75%, 14.16% to 17.15%, 17.24% to 20.96%, 20.58% to 24.34%, and 27.19% to 34.07%, respectively, from 7 days to 42 days after anthesis (Figure 5).

Figure 5

Under consistent light conditions, compared to N1, SPAD of N2 increased by 7.08% to 10.65%, 5.92% to 9.56%, 6.30% to 7.94%, 6.16% to 8.27%, 6.58% to 10.18%, 8.03% to 10.82%, and 7.48% to 13.30%, respectively, from 7 days to 42 days after anthesis.

3.2.2 The content of nitrogen content and accumulation in stems

Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, the nitrogen content and accumulation of L2 at maturity stage increased by 15.88% to 20.00% and 8.50% to 12.71%, respectively, compared to L1 (Table 3).

Table 3

CultivarTreatmentContent (%)Accumulation (Kg/hm2)
Anthesis stageMaturity stageAnthesis stageMaturity stage
Nanjing5718L1N10.75 ± 0.01c0.47 ± 0.001f43.36 ± 0.27d23.87 ± 0.06h
L1N20.87 ± 0.01b0.57 ± 0.003d56.04 ± 0.31b32.21 ± 0.18d
L2N10.75 ± 0.01c0.56 ± 0.01d42.83 ± 0.33d25.98 ± 0.51g
L2N20.88 ± 0.002b0.66 ± 0.003b56.14 ± 0.13b35.82 ± 0.18c
Nanjing9108L1N10.86 ± 0.004b0.49 ± 0.01e51.80 ± 0.23c28.33 ± 0.44f
L1N20.98 ± 0.03a0.59 ± 0.01c65.03 ± 1.72a37.57 ± 0.85b
L2N10.86 ± 0.004b0.59 ± 0.01c50.84 ± 0.25c30.74 ± 0.52e
L2N20.99 ± 0.01a0.71 ± 0.01a66.18 ± 0.59a42.34 ± 0.53a

Nitrogen content and accumulation in the stems of japonica rice.

Values are mean ± SD (n = 3) and values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

100% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L1N1), 100% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L1N2), 50% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L2N1) and 50% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L2N2).

Under consistent light conditions, the nitrogen content and accumulation of N2 at maturity stage increased by 17.68% to 21.16% and 32.58% to 37.87%, respectively, compared to N1.

3.2.3 The content of nitrogen in grain

Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, compared to L1, the nitrogen content of L2 increased by 10.18% to 11.24%, 11.29% to 13.07%, 12.20% to 13.02%, 10.58% to 12.89%, 10.92% to 14.76%, 11.70% to 15.82%, and 12.74% to 15.23%, respectively, from 7 days after anthesis to maturity stage (Figure 6).

Figure 6

Under consistent light conditions, compared to N1, the nitrogen content of N2 increased by 5.27% to 6.60%, 6.59% to 8.87%, 7.88% to 8.90%, 7.03% to 8.42%, 6.72% to 8.91%, 5.94% to 8.75%, and 6.27% to 7.64%, respectively, from 7 days after anthesis to maturity stage.

3.2.4 Enzyme activities of nitrogen metabolism in leaves and grains

Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, compared to L1, NR in leaves of L2 increased by 10.08% to 85.53% (Figure 7), while the activities of GOGAT and GS in grains of L2 increased by 11.15% to 28.36% and 7.54% to 26.86%, respectively, from 7 days to 42 days after anthesis.

Figure 7

Under consistent light conditions, compared to N1, NR in leaves of N2 increased by 13.25% to 49.26%, and the activities of GOGAT and GS in grains of N2 increased by 8.13% to 17.82% and 11.29% to 16.08%, respectively, from 7 days to 42 days after anthesis.

3.2.5 Characterization of protein content and accumulation in brown rice

Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, compared to L1, the content of total protein, albumin, globulin, prolamin, and glutelin in L2 increased by 11.60% to 29.26%, 1.63% to 4.21%, 6.09% to 15.36%, 6.81% to 14.49%, and 25.76% to 43.01%, respectively, from 7 days to 42 days after anthesis. Furthermore, reflecting the higher MAR of total protein and glutelin in L2 compared to L1 (Table 4), the accumulation of total protein and glutelin in L2 increased by 2.84% to 13.62% and 20.00% to 25.30%, respectively, at 42 days after anthesis (Figure 8).

Table 4A

CultivarTreatmentProteinGlutelin
MAR
(mg grain-1 d-1)
KR2MAR
(mg grain-1 d-1)
KR2
Nanjing5718L1N10.04482.200.943790.261912.980.95280
L1N20.04842.370.960380.304814.810.96897
L2N10.05072.510.971490.332716.120.97770
L2N20.05152.620.968520.363418.190.98111
Nanjing9108L1N10.03871.960.946980.197810.370.93062
L1N20.04152.100.969220.233112.080.97090
L2N10.04212.210.966220.248112.790.97381
L2N20.04272.290.973850.271114.150.97935

Characteristics of protein accumulation.

Protein accumulation was modeled using the logarithmic equation y=K/(1+ea−bx). K, the max accumulation. R2, determination coefficient of the equation. Mean accumulation rate (MAR). 100% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L1N1), 100% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L1N2), 50% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L2N1) and 50% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L2N2).

Table 4B

CultivarTreatmentAlbuminGlobulinProlamin
MAR
(mg grain-1 d-1)
KR2MAR
(mg grain-1 d-1)
KR2MAR
(mg grain-1 d-1)
KR2
Nanjing5718L1N10.03662.140.962370.03941.560.986790.02971.520.93488
L1N20.03762.170.973130.03701.520.990180.02881.530.95202
L2N10.03512.010.973390.03671.500.990330.02961.480.95276
L2N20.03402.080.975950.03481.490.992680.02881.500.95696
Nanjing9108L1N10.03142.060.959450.03311.450.981560.02751.490.93905
L1N20.03242.030.979300.03311.460.992440.02821.500.96406
L2N10.02911.840.970250.03171.430.986840.02711.460.96422
L2N20.02771.840.981260.03131.440.993560.02601.430.97452

Characteristics of protein accumulation.

Protein accumulation was modeled using the logarithmic equation y=K/(1+ea−bx). K, the max accumulation. R2, determination coefficient of the equation. Mean accumulation rate (MAR). 100% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L1N1), 100% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L1N2), 50% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L2N1) and 50% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L2N2).

Figure 8

Under consistent light conditions, compared to N1, the content of total protein, albumin, globulin, prolamin, and glutelin in N2 increased by 5.37% to 19.35%, 3.26% to 6.90%, 1.76% to 9.58%, 3.25% to 6.68%, and 14.49% to 21.57%, respectively, from 7 days to 42 days after anthesis. Moreover, reflecting the higher MAR of total protein and glutelin in N2 compared to N1, the accumulation of total protein and glutelin in N2 increased by 0.44% to 10.97% and 11.60% to 15.85%, respectively, at 42 days after anthesis.

3.3 Differences in C/N of grains under different light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions

Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, compared to L1, C/N of L2 was decreased by 25.86% to 33.19%, 24.76% to 32.81%, 26.81% to 31.95%, 27.34% to 30.47%, 27.05% to 32.79%, 27.69% to 33.95%, and 30.45% to 37.10%, respectively, from 7 days after anthesis to maturity stage (Table 5).

Table 5

CultivarTreatment7d14d21d28d35d42dMS
Nanjing5718L1N121.45 ± 0.08a36.12 ± 0.09a53.07 ± 0.86a60.26 ± 1.34a61.51 ± 0.87a61.30 ± 3.22a61.21 ± 0.88a
L1N218.49 ± 0.52c31.90 ± 0.51c46.53 ± 0.98c53.37 ± 0.44b54.05 ± 0.80b53.66 ± 1.58c54.24 ± 2.86b
L2N115.16 ± 0.26d26.86 ± 0.41d37.58 ± 0.83d43.79 ± 0.96c43.92 ± 1.16c42.95 ± 1.30e42.16 ± 1.44d
L2N212.46 ± 0.21e22.84 ± 0.14e31.66 ± 0.58e37.11 ± 0.23d36.65 ± 0.11d35.45 ± 1.18f34.11 ± 0.33e
Nanjing9108L1N120.19 ± 0.12b35.63 ± 0.40b51.89 ± 1.66b61.60 ± 0.07a61.54 ± 1.00a58.98 ± 1.66b59.50 ± 1.07a
L1N217.86 ± 0.79c31.48 ± 0.75c45.54 ± 0.66c54.30 ± 0.51b53.79 ± 0.59b51.64 ± 1.14d52.11 ± 2.20c
L2N114.97 ± 0.24d26.81 ± 0.90d37.97 ± 0.95d44.73 ± 0.83c44.89 ± 0.43c42.64 ± 0.98e41.38 ± 1.13d
L2N211.93 ± 0.25e21.15 ± 0.87e31.47 ± 0.65e37.91 ± 0.74d36.15 ± 0.52d34.33 ± 0.47f33.57 ± 0.84e

Dynamics of C/N in the grains of japonica rice after anthesis.

Values are mean ± SD (n = 3) and values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Maturity stage (MS).

100% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L1N1), 100% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L1N2), 50% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L2N1) and 50% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L2N2).

Under consistent light conditions, compared to N1, C/N of N2 was decreased by 11.55% to 20.29%, 11.65% to 21.10%, 12.21% to 17.12%, 11.44% to 15.25%, 12.12% to 19.46%, 12.43% to 19.51%, and 11.40% to 19.07%, respectively, from 7 days after anthesis to maturity stage.

3.4 Differences in carbon and nitrogen metabolism products and eating quality at maturity stage under different light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions

3.4.1 The starch, protein and its components of japonica rice (milled rice)

We further investigated the starch, protein, and their components in milled rice, which is commonly used for cooking purposes. The data concerning starch and protein in milled rice under various treatments exhibited a consistent trend with the related data observed in brown rice (Figure 4; Figure 8). Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, compared to L1, the TSC, AC, and APC of L2 decreased by 4.30% to 5.59%, 6.87% to 11.52%, and 3.62% to 5.42%, respectively (Table 6). Moreover, when compared to L1, the content of total protein, albumin, globulin, prolamin, and glutelin in L2 increased by 21.31% to 29.70%, 3.74% to 15.36%, 9.98% to 20.88%, 9.61% to 15.14%, and 22.81% to 49.28%, respectively (Table 7).

Table 6

CultivarTreatmentTSC(%)AC(%)APC(%)
Nanjing5718L1N176.67 ± 0.41a9.61 ± 0.07a67.06 ± 0.35a
L1N275.44 ± 0.40ab9.15 ± 0.09b66.29 ± 0.49a
L2N173.37 ± 0.94cd8.95 ± 0.04c64.42 ± 0.89bc
L2N271.22 ± 0.09ef8.52 ± 0.06d62.70 ± 0.09d
Nanjing9108L1N175.69 ± 0.74ab9.15 ± 0.10b66.54 ± 0.66a
L1N274.31 ± 0.38bc8.68 ± 0.05d65.63 ± 0.42ab
L2N172.26 ± 0.27de8.13 ± 0.05e64.13 ± 0.24c
L2N270.21 ± 0.91f7.68 ± 0.03f62.53 ± 0.89d

Starch and components in milled rice of japonica rice.

Values are mean ± SD (n = 3) and values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Total starch content (TSC), amylose content (AC) and amylopectin content (APC).

100% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L1N1), 100% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L1N2), 50% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L2N1) and 50% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L2N2).

Table 7

CultivarTreatmentPC (%)Content (mg/g)
AlbuminGlobulinProlaminGlutelin
Nanjing5718L1N16.66 ± 0.09f2.56 ± 0.05f3.97 ± 0.03de5.37 ± 0.02d45.19 ± 0.42d
L1N28.16 ± 0.07e2.74 ± 0.03e4.03 ± 0.05cd5.64 ± 0.08cd58.89 ± 2.34c
L2N18.35 ± 0.07d2.70 ± 0.06e4.37 ± 0.01b5.88 ± 0.14bc60.42 ± 0.95c
L2N210.03 ± 0.13a3.16 ± 0.06d4.54 ± 0.08b6.38 ± 0.04a76.74 ± 0.69a
Nanjing9108L1N16.68 ± 0.08f3.23 ± 0.01cd3.72 ± 0.06e5.41 ± 0.07d41.00 ± 0.12d
L1N28.11 ± 0.07e3.46 ± 0.04b4.28 ± 0.07bc5.83 ± 0.04c57.39 ± 1.41c
L2N18.67 ± 0.07c3.35 ± 0.01bc4.50 ± 0.06b6.23 ± 0.04ab61.20 ± 1.65bc
L2N29.84 ± 0.12b3.60 ± 0.02a5.11 ± 0.05a6.41 ± 0.01a70.49 ± 1.69ab

Protein and components in milled rice of japonica rice.

Values are mean ± SD (n = 3) and values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Protein content (PC).

100% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L1N1), 100% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L1N2), 50% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L2N1) and 50% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L2N2).

Under consistent light conditions, compared to N1, the TSC, AC and APC of N2 decreased by 1.60% to 2.93%, 4.79% to 5.54% and 1.15% to 2.67%, respectively. Additionally, when compared to N1, the content of total protein, albumin, globulin, prolamin and glutelin in N2 increased by 13.53% to 22.47%, 7.17% to 17.07%, 1.44% to 15.09%, 2.84% to 8.42% and 15.17% to 40.00%, respectively.

3.4.2 The eating quality of japonica rice (milled rice)

Under equivalent nitrogen conditions, compared to L1, the appearance, adhesiveness, elasticity, and taste values of cooked L2 rice decreased by 13.24% to 14.77%, 7.46% to 8.33%, 1.10% to 3.96% and 10.06% to 11.42%, respectively, while the hardness of cooked L2 rice increased by 13.17% to 13.99% (Table 8).

Table 8

CultivarTreatmentTexture PropertiesTaste Analyzer Properties
Hardness (g)Elasticity (%)Adhesiveness (g)AppearanceTaste Value
Nanjing5718L1N1116.83 ± 1.34d0.496 ± 0.002b1373.07 ± 10.88a8.90 ± 0.15a86.25 ± 1.10a
L1N2123.95 ± 2.13c0.505 ± 0.002a1317.78 ± 8.74b8.10 ± 0.05b80.46 ± 0.10b
L2N1133.18 ± 2.60b0.490 ± 0.003c1260.92 ± 20.61d7.66 ± 0.11c76.59 ± 0.79c
L2N2140.72 ± 1.32a0.485 ± 0.002d1219.42 ± 7.49e6.99 ± 0.20d72.16 ± 1.16d
Nanjing9108L1N1118.87 ± 2.25d0.499 ± 0.002b1354.20 ± 11.73a8.80 ± 0.17a85.55 ± 1.35a
L1N2124.56 ± 1.49c0.502 ± 0.002a1292.50 ± 22.02c8.16 ± 0.06b80.78 ± 0.47b
L2N1135.33 ± 1.07b0.489 ± 0.002c1241.40 ± 4.25de7.50 ± 0.11c75.78 ± 1.04c
L2N2140.96 ± 1.13a0.487 ± 0.002cd1192.45 ± 12.99f7.08 ± 0.05d72.65 ± 0.80d

The eating quality of rice.

Values are mean ± SD (n = 3) and values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

100% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L1N1), 100% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L1N2), 50% natural light intensity without panicle fertilizer (L2N1) and 50% natural light intensity with panicle fertilizer (L2N2).

Under consistent light conditions, compared to N1, the appearance, adhesiveness, and taste values of cooked N2 rice decreased by 5.60% to 8.99%, 3.29% to 4.56% and 4.13% to 6.71%, respectively, while hardness of cooked N2 rice increased by 4.18% to 6.09%.

3.5 Relationships between C/N and carbon and nitrogen metabolism and rice eating quality

3.5.1 Correlation analysis between carbon and nitrogen metabolism-related enzymes and products and C/N

The correlation analysis revealed a strong association between carbon and nitrogen metabolism and C/N (Figure 9). Regarding metabolic enzymes, the activities of enzymes involved in carbon metabolism displayed a positive correlation with C/N, while the activity of enzymes related to nitrogen metabolism exhibited a negative correlation with C/N. Notably, enzymes such as AGPase, GBSS, SSS, SBE, and DBE in grains demonstrated significant or highly significant positive correlations with C/N across the entire grain filling period. In contrast, NR in leaves, and GS and GOGST in grains displayed significant or highly significant negative correlations with the C/N across the entire grain filling period. Concerning metabolic products, starch and amylose, as carbon metabolic products, exhibited significant or highly significant positive correlations with C/N throughout the entire grain filling stage. Conversely, nitrogen metabolic products, particularly proteins, notably glutelin, demonstrated significant or highly significant negative correlations with C/N during the grain filling stage. Additionally, albumin, globulin, and prolamin exhibited negative or significantly negative correlations with C/N during the grain filling stage.

Figure 9

3.5.2 Correlation analysis between C/N and rice eating quality

In this study, a strong correlation was observed between the C/N in grains and both carbon and nitrogen metabolism (Figure 9). Higher C/N ratios in grains were associated with robust carbon metabolic capacity but weaker nitrogen metabolic capacity. As the C/N ratio decreased, carbon metabolism gradually weakened while nitrogen metabolism gradually enhanced (Figure 9). Subsequently, we performed a correlation analysis between the C/N ratio and rice eating quality to investigate the relationship between carbon and nitrogen metabolism and rice eating quality (Figure 10). The findings revealed a significant or highly significant positive correlation between the C/N and attributes such as elasticity, adhesiveness, appearance, and taste value of rice. Conversely, a significant or highly significant negative correlation was observed between the C/N ratio and hardness. These results suggest that the level of carbon metabolism exhibited a positive association with rice eating quality, while nitrogen metabolism showed a negative correlation with rice eating quality.

Figure 10

4 Discussion

4.1 Differences in carbon and nitrogen metabolism of japonica rice during filling stage under different light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions

In this study, compared with L1, the activity of RuBPase in L2 leaves was reduced (Figure 3), leading to a decreased capacity to assimilate CO2 (Parry et al., 2012). Consequently, the net photosynthetic rate in L2 leaves declined (Figure 1). This reduction in photosynthetic efficiency resulted in inadequate carbohydrate accumulation, thereby contributing to a decreased NSC content in both the stems and grains of L2 (Table 1; Figure 2). Additionally, we observed reduced activities of starch synthesis enzymes, including AGPase, GBSS, SSS, SBE, and DBE in L2 grains (Figure 3), which constrained the synthesis of both amylose and amylopectin (Jeng et al., 2007; Pfister and Zeeman, 2016; Wang et al., 2021). Consequently, the MAR, content, and accumulation of starch in L2 grains were all reduced compared to those in L1 (Table 2; Figure 4). Carbon and nitrogen metabolism are intricately interconnected, with nitrogen metabolism depending on carbon metabolism to supply the essential carbon skeletons (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2023b). The results of this study reveal that the carbon metabolic capacity of L2 was inferior to that of L1. This suggests that the carbon metabolism of L2 was insufficient in supplying an adequate amount of carbon skeletons for nitrogen assimilation and translocation, consequently impeding the normal transference of nitrogen from leaves to stems and grains. As a consequence, the leaves of L2 sustained an extended green period, as indicated by elevated SPAD values (Figure 5). Nonetheless, under low light conditions, the presence of blue and violet light enhances nitrogen synthesis (; Wang et al., 2015). An increased nitrogen supply compensated for the deficiency in nitrogen translocation from the leaves, resulting in higher nitrogen levels in both the stems and grains of L2 (Table 3; Figure 6). Additionally, our observations indicated elevated activities of GS and GOGAT in L2 grains (Figure 7), known to enhance protein synthesis (Fei et al., 2023; Tang et al., 2018). Consequently, the protein content of L2, comprising albumin, globulin, prolamin, and glutelin, exceeded that of L1 (Table 4; Figure 8). In conclusion, a 50% reduction in light intensity inhibited carbon metabolism but promoted nitrogen metabolism, resulting in a decrease in the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio in grains. This transition ultimately led to a decrease in starch content and an increase in protein content in the endosperm.

Nitrogen fertilization is a crucial factor in influencing nitrogen metabolism. Previous studies have found that increased nitrogen fertilization can slow down chlorophyll breakdown, thereby postponing leaf senescence (). Consistent with these findings, our study observed a comparable phenomenon wherein leaves exhibited sustained high SPAD values following the application of panicle fertilizer (N2) (Figure 5). NR serves as a pivotal enzyme in nitrogen assimilation, and its heightened activity facilitates nitrate reduction, thereby accelerating nitrogen assimilation (Liu et al., 2022). In this study, the NR activity in N2 leaves was significantly higher than in N1 (Figure 7), facilitating nitrogen assimilation and accumulation. Additionally, studies have demonstrated that the application of nitrogen fertilizer during the later stages of growth can enhance root development and maintain optimal root activity, leading to increased nitrogen absorption and utilization by the roots (; Xu et al., 2023a). Consequently, the nitrogen content in the stems and grains of N2 surpassed that of N1 (Table 3; Figure 6). Furthermore, elevated activities of GOGAT and GS were observed in N2 grains (Figure 7). The ample nitrogen availability and heightened enzyme activities supported protein synthesis and accumulation (Table 4), leading to elevated levels of albumin, globulin, prolamin, and glutelin in the endosperm of N2 in comparison to N1 (Figure 8) (Fei et al., 2023; Tang et al., 2018). Nitrogen fertilizer, besides influencing nitrogen metabolism, also impacts carbon metabolism. In this study, compared to N1, the activity of RuBPase in N2 leaves was increased (Figure 3), resulting in an enhanced photosynthetic rate of the leaves (Figure 1), promoting the synthesis of more carbohydrates (Parry et al., 2012). However, we observed that the NSC content in the stems and grains of N2 was lower than that of N1 (Table 1; Figure 2). This observation may be attributed to the significant decrease in SBE activity and its mRNA expression in rice plants under high nitrogen fertilizer conditions, consequently inhibiting starch synthesis (Hu, 2020; Hirano et al., 2005). Moreover, compared to N1, the activities of enzymes associated with starch synthesis in N2 grains were reduced (Figure 3), consequently impeding the synthesis of both amylose and amylopectin (Table 2) (Fei et al., 2023; Tang et al., 2018). Consequently, the TSC, AC, and APC of N2 were lower than those of N1 (Figure 4). In conclusion, the application of panicle fertilizer suppressed carbon metabolism while enhancing nitrogen metabolism, resulting in a reduction in the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio in grains, an elevation in protein content, and a reduction in starch content in the endosperm.

4.2 Relationship between carbon and nitrogen metabolism and rice eating quality

The present study unveiled notable differences in carbon and nitrogen metabolism of the same japonica rice cultivar across varying light and nitrogen fertilizer treatments, highlighting their impact on the ultimate rice eating quality. Previous research has indicated that the metabolic capacity of rice in terms of carbon and nitrogen can be assessed, to a certain degree, by the C/N ratio (Sun et al., 2020, 2017). In our investigation, the C/N ratio in grains under various light and nitrogen conditions exhibited the following order: L1N1 > L1N2 > L2N1 > L2N2. Subsequent analysis indicated that higher C/N ratios in grains were associated with enhanced carbon metabolism and relatively reduced nitrogen metabolism (Figure 9), a trend that aligns with previous observations (). To investigate the relationship between carbon and nitrogen metabolism and rice eating quality, a correlation analysis was conducted between the C/N ratio and taste value. The results revealed a positive correlation between the C/N ratio and rice eating quality (Figure 10), indicating that elevated carbon metabolism levels are associated with improved rice eating quality, while nitrogen metabolism exhibits a contrasting influence. In our study, elevated levels of carbon metabolism were associated with abundant NSC in grains, accompanied by increased enzyme activities of APGase, GBSS, SSS, SBE, and DBE, which facilitated starch synthesis and consequently resulted in an increase in amylose content (Figure 9). Nevertheless, it is commonly understood that a high AC is generally detrimental to the development of rice eating quality (Li et al., 2023; Tao et al., 2019), which appears to contradict our observation of a positive correlation between carbon metabolism levels and rice eating quality (Figure 10). In reality, there exists a trade-off relationship between carbon and nitrogen metabolism (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2013). Elevated carbon metabolism is frequently associated with reduced nitrogen metabolism, which can slow down nitrogen assimilation in rice plants, resulting in diminished nitrogen content and inadequate activities of GS and GOGAT in the grain. Consequently, this scenario leads to sluggish protein synthesis and a notable decrease in protein content (Figure 9). The reduced protein content counteracts the adverse effects of high AC on the texture of cooked rice (Saleh, 2017; Shi et al., 2023), thereby improving rice eating quality with increasing levels of carbon metabolism. Nitrogen metabolism levels exhibited a negative correlation with rice eating quality (Figure 10). Our study revealed that higher nitrogen metabolism levels were associated with grains containing abundant nitrogen content and increased activities of GS and GOGAT enzymes. These nitrogen and enzymes accelerate protein synthesis, leading to a significant rise in protein content, particularly the glutelin. Intensified nitrogen metabolism implies a decline in carbon metabolism, impeding starch synthesis and decreasing amylose content (Figure 9). Despite the favorable impact of low amylose content on rice eating quality, it is insufficient to counterbalance the adverse effects of high protein content on the texture of cooked rice (Yin et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2021b). Hence, heightened nitrogen metabolism results in inferior rice eating quality. In conclusion, carbon and nitrogen metabolism are intricately linked to rice eating quality, collectively influencing the synthesis of starch and protein in the endosperm through the regulation of carbon and nitrogen substrates and enzymes, thereby affecting rice eating quality.

5 Conclusion

In this study, a 50% reduction in light intensity suppressed carbon metabolism while enhancing nitrogen metabolism, leading to a reduction in the C/N ratio, decreased starch content, increased PC, and consequently, inferior rice eating quality. Conversely, the use of panicle fertilizer enhanced nitrogen metabolism while limiting carbon metabolism, resulting in a similar outcome of reduced C/N ratio, elevated PC, and diminished starch content, contributing to suboptimal rice eating quality. The C/N ratio could serve as an indicator of the carbon and nitrogen metabolic capacities, where a higher ratio indicates strong carbon metabolism and comparatively weaker nitrogen metabolism. Carbon and nitrogen metabolism were closely linked to rice eating quality, with heightened carbon metabolism favoring superior rice eating quality, while nitrogen metabolism had a contrasting impact. In summary, notable variances in carbon and nitrogen metabolism were observed within the same japonica rice cultivar under diverse light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions. These metabolic differences impact the synthesis of starch and protein in the endosperm, ultimately influencing the quality of rice. Our findings suggest that the regulation of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in rice through breeding or cultivation measures in the future represents a pivotal and promising approach to improving the rice eating quality.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

ZM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JC: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. XC: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. JY: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. LG: Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. FX: Writing – review & editing. QH: Writing – review & editing. GL: Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YZ: Writing – review & editing. HZ: Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. HW: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32372215, 32372212, 32201891), the Earmarked Fund for CARS (Rice, CARS-01), the National Key Research Program of China (2022YFD2301401), the Collaborative Promotion Project for Major Agricultural Technologies (2024-ZYXT-03-1), the Changzhou Modern Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Center Project (CAIC (2023)005) and the Priority Subject Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    Carmo-SilvaA. E.SalvucciM. E. (2013). The regulatory properties of rubisco activase differ among species and affect photosynthetic induction during light transitions. Plant Physiol.161, 16451655. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.213348

  • 2

    ChenH.LiQ. P.ZengY. L.DengF.RenW. J. (2019). Effect of different shading materials on grain yield and quality of rice. Sci. Rep.9, 992. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46437-9

  • 3

    ChenX. Y.ZhuY.MaZ. T.ZhangM.WeiH. Y.ZhangH. C.et al. (2023). Effects of light intensity and nitrogen fertilizer interaction on carbon and nitrogen metabolism at grain-filling stage and its relationship with yield and quality of southern soft japonica rice. Agronomica Sin.49, 30423062. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.22054

  • 4

    DengF.LiQ. P.ChenH.ZengY. L.LiB.ZhongX. Y.et al. (2021). Relationship between chalkiness and the structural and thermal properties of rice starch after shading during grain-filling stage. Carbohydr. Polymers252, 117212. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117212

  • 5

    DengF.WangL.PuS. L.MeiX. F.LiS. X.LiQ. P.et al. (2018). Shading stress increases chalkiness by postponing caryopsis development and disturbing starch characteristics of rice grains. Agric. For. Meteorology263, 4958. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.08.006

  • 6

    FeiL. W.YangS. C.MaA. L. Y.LunzhuC.WangM.WangG. J.et al. (2023). Grain chalkiness is reduced by coordinating the biosynthesis of protein and starch in fragrant rice (Oryza sativa L.) grain under nitrogen fertilization. Field Crops Res.302, 109098 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109098

  • 7

    HiranoT.SaitoY.UshimaruH.MichiyamaH. (2005). The effect of the amount of nitrogen fertilizer on starch metabolism in leaf sheath of japonica and indica rice varieties during the heading period. Plant Production Sci.8, 122130. doi: 10.1626/pps.8.122

  • 8

    HuQ. (2020). Effect of mid-stage nitrogen regulation on yield and quality of japonica rice with good taste quality and its physiological mechanism. Yangzhou Univ.

  • 9

    HuangM.ZhangH. D.ZhaoC. R.ChenG. H.ZouY. B. (2019). Amino acid content in rice grains is affected by high temperature during the early grain-filling period. Sci. Rep.9, 2700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38883-2

  • 10

    JengT. L.WangC. S.TsengT. H.SungJ. M. (2007). Expression of granule-bound starch synthase in developing rice grain. J. Sci. Food Agric.87, 24562463. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.v87:13

  • 11

    LiC. F.JiY.LiE. P.GilbertR. G. (2023). Interactions between leached amylose and protein affect the stickiness of cooked white rice. Food Hydrocolloids135, 108215. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108215

  • 12

    LiH. Y.GilbertR. G. (2018). Starch molecular structure: The basis for an improved understanding of cooked rice texture. Carbohydr Polym195, 917. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.04.065

  • 13

    LiJ.FengY. H.WangX. K.XuG. L.LuoZ. F.PengJ. F. X.et al. (2022a). High nitrogen input increases the total spikelets but decreases the high-density grain content in hybrid indica rice. Field Crops Res.288, 108679. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108679

  • 14

    LiQ. P.DengF.ZengY. L.LiB.HeC. Y.ZhuY. Y.et al. (2022b). Low light stress increases chalkiness by disturbing starch synthesis and grain filling of rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23, 9153. doi: 10.3390/ijms23169153

  • 15

    LiuG. D.ZhangC.GaoH.ZhangH. C.WeiH. Y. (2021). Water migration, texture and oral processing properties of semi-waxy rice during retrogradation. J. Food Sci.86, 51005106. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15959

  • 16

    LiuX. J.HuB.ChuC. C. (2022). Nitrogen assimilation in plants: current status and future prospects. J. Genet. Genomics49, 394404. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2021.12.006

  • 17

    LongX. K.GuanC. M.WangL.JiaL. T.FuX. J.LinQ. L.et al. (2023). Rice storage proteins: focus on composition, distribution, genetic improvement and effects on rice quality. Rice Sci.30, 207221. doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2023.03.005

  • 18

    MaZ. T.MaH. Z.ChenZ. F.ChenX. Y.LiuG. D.HuQ.et al. (2022). Quality characteristics of rice in southern and northern China and the effect of environments on its quality. Agronomy-Basel12, 2757. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12112757

  • 19

    MaZ. T.ZhuY.WangZ. J.ChenX.CaoJ. L.LiuG. D.et al. (2024). Effect of starch and protein on eating quality of japonica rice in Yangtze River Delta. Int. J. Biol. Macromolecules261, 129918. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129918

  • 20

    Nunes-NesiA.FernieA. R.StittM. (2010). Metabolic and signaling aspects underpinning the regulation of plant carbon nitrogen interactions. Mol. Plant3, 973996. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq049

  • 21

    ParryM. A. J.AndralojcP. J.ScalesJ. C.SalvucciM. E.Carmo-SilvaA. E.AlonsoH.et al. (2012). Rubisco activity and regulation as targets for crop improvement. J. Exp. Bot.64, 717730. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers336

  • 22

    PfisterB.ZeemanS. C. (2016). Formation of starch in plant cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.73, 27812807. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2250-x

  • 23

    SalehM. I. (2017). Protein-starch matrix microstructure during rice flour pastes formation. J. Cereal Sci.74, 183186. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2017.02.005

  • 24

    SapanC. V.LundbladR. L.PriceN. C. (1999). Colorimetric protein assay techniques. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem.29, 99108. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-8744.1999.tb00538.x

  • 25

    ScottG.AwikaJ. M. (2023). Effect of protein-starch interactions on starch retrogradation and implications for food product quality. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.22, 20812111. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.13141

  • 26

    ShiW. J.MuthurajanR.RahmanH.SelvamJ.PengS. B.ZouY. B.et al. (2012). Source–sink dynamics and proteomic reprogramming under elevated night temperature and their impact on rice yield and grain quality. New Phytol.197, 825837. doi: 10.1111/nph.12088

  • 27

    ShiS. J.ZhangG. Y.ChenL. L.ZhangW. H.WangX. D.PanK. Q.et al. (2023). Different nitrogen fertilizer application in the field affects the morphology and structure of protein and starch in rice during cooking. Food Res. Int.163, 112193. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112193

  • 28

    SunW. F.HuangA.SangY. Y.FuY.YangZ. B. (2013). Carbon–nitrogen interaction modulates plant growth and expression of metabolic genes in rice. J. Plant Growth Regul.32, 575584. doi: 10.1007/s00344-013-9324-x

  • 29

    SunY. J.SunY. Y.YanF. J.LiY.WuY. X.GuoC. C.et al. (2020). Coordinating postanthesis carbon and nitrogen metabolism of hybrid rice through different irrigation and nitrogen regimes. Agronomy10, 1187. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10081187

  • 30

    SunY. J.SunY. Y.YanF. J.YangZ. Y.XuH.LiY.et al. (2017). Effects of postponing nitrogen topdressing on post-anthesis carbon and ni-trogen metabolism in rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiencies. Agronomica Sin.43, 407419. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.00407

  • 31

    TanakaM.KeiraM.YoonD.-K.MaeT.IshidaH.MakinoA.et al. (2022). Photosynthetic enhancement, lifespan extension, and leaf area enlargement in flag leaves increased the yield of transgenic rice plants overproducing rubisco under sufficient N fertilization. Rice15, 10. doi: 10.1186/s12284-022-00557-5

  • 32

    TangS.ChenW. Z.LiuW. Z.ZhouQ. Y.ZhangH. X.WangS. H.et al. (2018). Open-field warming regulates the morphological structure, protein synthesis of grain and affects the appearance quality of rice. J. Cereal Sci.84, 2029. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2018.09.013

  • 33

    TaoK. Y.YuW. W.PrakashS.GilbertR. G. (2019). High-amylose rice: Starch molecular structural features controlling cooked rice texture and preference. Carbohydr. Polymers219, 251260. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.031

  • 34

    WangW. T.CuiW. P.XuK.GaoH.WeiH. Y.ZhangH. C. (2021). Effects of early- and late-sowing on starch accumulation and associated enzyme activities during grain filling stage in rice. Rice Sci.28, 191199. doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2021.01.008

  • 35

    WangL.DengF.RenW. J. (2015). Shading tolerance in rice is related to better light harvesting and use efficiency and grain filling rate during grain filling period. Field Crops Res.180, 5462. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.05.010

  • 36

    WeiH. Y.ZhuY.QiuS.HanC.HuL.XuD.et al. (2018). Combined effect of shading time and nitrogen level on grain filling and grain quality in japonica super rice. J. Integr. Agric.17, 24052417. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62025-8

  • 37

    WeiH.Ge JL.Zhang XB.ZhuW.DengF.RenW.et al. (2023). Decreased panicle N application alleviates the negative effects of shading on rice grain yield and grain quality. J. Integr. Agric.22, 20412053. doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2022.08.045

  • 38

    XuR.ChenS.XuC. M.LiuY. Y.ZhangX. F.WangD. Y.et al. (2023a). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer rates on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of japonica-indica hybrid rice cultivar Yongyou-1540 and its physiological bases. Acta Agron. Sin.49, 16301642. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.22040

  • 39

    XuY.ZhangK.LiS. H.ZhouY. Q.RanS. X.XuR.et al. (2023b). Carbon and nitrogen metabolism in tomato (solanum lycopersicum L.) leaves response to nitrogen treatment. Plant Growth Regul.100, 747756. doi: 10.1007/s10725-023-00969-3

  • 40

    YeM.WangZ. Y.WuM.LiH. Y.GuJ. F.YangJ. C.et al. (2024). Optimized leaf anatomy improves photosynthetic producing capacity of mid-season indica rice in the Yangtze River Basin during the genetic improvement. Eur. J. Agron.158, 127196. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2024.127196

  • 41

    YinX. T.ChenX. Y.HuJ. L.ZhuL.ZhangH.HongY. (2023). Effects of distribution, structure and interactions of starch, protein and cell walls on textural formation of cooked rice: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromolecules253, 127403. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127403

  • 42

    YoshidaS.FornoD. A.CockJ. (1976). Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. IRRI Los Baños, 6164.

  • 43

    YuX. S.WangL. S.ZhangJ. J.WangZ. G.WangK. X.DuanY. M.et al. (2023). Understanding effects of glutelin on physicochemical and structural properties of extruded starch and the underlying mechanism. Carbohydr Polym304, 120513. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120513

  • 44

    ZhangY. J.FernieA. R. (2023). The role of TCA cycle enzymes in plants. Adv. Biol. (Weinh)7, e2200238. doi: 10.1002/adbi.202200238

  • 45

    ZhangJ.ZhangY. Y.SongN. Y.ChenQ. L.SunH. Z.PengT.et al. (2021a). Response of grain-filling rate and grain quality of mid-season indica rice to nitrogen application. J. Integr. Agric.20, 14651473. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63311-1

  • 46

    ZhangL. X.ZhangC. Q.YanY.HuZ. J.WangK.ZhouJ. H.et al. (2021b). Influence of starch fine structure and storage proteins on the eating quality of rice varieties with similar amylose contents. J. Sci. Food Agric.101, 38113818. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.v101.9

  • 47

    ZhuY.XuD.ChenX. Y.MaZ. T.MaH. Z.ZhangM. Y.et al. (2022). Quality characteristics of semi-glutinous japonica rice cultivated in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River in China. J. Sci. Food Agric.102, 37123723. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.v102.9

  • 48

    ZhuY.XuD.MaZ. T.ChenX. Y.ZhangM. Y.ZhangC.et al. (2021). Differences in eating quality attributes between japonica rice from the northeast region and semiglutinous japonica rice from the yangtze river delta of China. Foods10, 2770. doi: 10.3390/foods10112770

Summary

Keywords

light intensity, nitrogen fertilizer, carbon metabolism nitrogen metabolism, C/N, eating quality, soft japonica rice

Citation

Ma Z, Cao J, Chen X, Yu J, Guodong L, Xu F, Hu Q, Li G, Zhu Y, Zhang H and Wei H (2025) Differences in carbon and nitrogen metabolism of soft japonica rice in southern China during grain filling stage under different light and nitrogen fertilizer conditions and their relationship with rice eating quality. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1534625. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1534625

Received

26 November 2024

Accepted

07 January 2025

Published

28 January 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited by

Noureddine Benkeblia, University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica

Reviewed by

Zhaowen Mo, South China Agricultural University, China

Hongmei Cai, Huazhong Agricultural University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Haiyan Wei,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics