AUTHOR=Shi Shuo , Shi Zixi , Qu Fangfang , Gong Wei , Xu Lu , Liu Chenxi 

TITLE=Analyzing canopy structure effects based on LiDAR for GPP-SIF relationship and GPP estimation

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Plant Science

VOLUME=Volume 16 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1561826

DOI=10.3389/fpls.2025.1561826

ISSN=1664-462X

ABSTRACT=The coupling between Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) and Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) is crucial for understanding terrestrial carbon cycles, with the GPP/SIF ratio regulated by canopy structure, environmental change, and other factors. While studies on canopy structure focus on how internal structure regulates light use efficiency, the impact of remotely sensed canopy structural parameters, particularly Fractional Vegetation Cover (FVC) and Leaf Area Index (LAI), on GPP-SIF coupling remains understudied. Investigating the response of canopy structure to GPP-SIF in large-scale forests supports high-accuracy GPP estimation. LiDAR offers unparalleled advantages in capturing complex vertical canopy structures. In this study, we used multi-source data, particularly LiDAR-derived canopy structure products, to analyze the annual variations in canopy structural parameters and GPP/SIF across different forest types, investigate the response of canopy structure to the GPP-SIF relationship, and employ machine learning models to estimate GPP and assess the contribution of canopy structural factors. We found that LiDAR-derived canopy structure products effectively captured vegetation growth dynamics, exhibiting strong correlation with MODIS products (maximum R²=0.95), but with higher values in densely vegetated areas. GPP/SIF exhibited significant seasonal and forest-type variations, peaking in summer. Its correlation with canopy structural parameters varied seasonally, ranging from 0.21 to 0.75. In summer, the correlation decreased by 5.53% to 30.59% compared to other seasons. In random forest models, incorporating canopy structural parameters improved GPP estimation accuracy (R2 increasing by 1.30% to 8.07%).