Abstract
In Brazil, most orchards are not irrigated and flowering usually occurs in August/September, the season with the least rainfall, making it necessary to use drought-tolerant rootstocks. Reduced scion vigor, associated with drought tolerance, are essential factors for high-density planting systems in conditions of limited water availability. The identification of molecular markers potentially associated with these characteristics is essential to accelerate the improvement of citrus rootstocks. This study aimed to identify DArTseq molecular markers related to dwarfism and drought tolerance in citrandarin rootstocks (Citrus sunki × Poncirus trifoliata) using an in silico Bulk Segregant Analysis (BSA) approach. Experiments were conducted in Barretos, a municipality in the northern region of the São Paulo state. The bulks were selected based on vegetative development and leaf rolling scores for drought tolerance. The molecular markers were identified through differences in allele frequency between the groups, and the markers putatively associated underwent functional annotation to infer candidate genes for these characteristics using the Blast2GO program with the NCBI nr database. A total of 12 candidate markers were identified and associated with the characteristics of interest, including six related to reduced vigor and six to drought tolerance. The functional annotation enabled the identification for gene sequences associated with biological processes related to plant development, root architecture, hormonal regulation, and response to abiotic stress. The identified markers represent candidate genomic regions potentially involved in vigor regulation and drought response. These results represent valuable resources for future research in citrus rootstock breeding programs.
1 Introduction
Brazil stands out as the world’s leading producer of oranges and exporter of orange juice. In 2024, it produced approximately 15.7 million tons of fruit from a harvested area of 565 thousand hectares. The state of São Paulo is the main citrus-producing region in Brazil, with approximately 12 million tons of fruit, corresponding to 77% of the national orange production (). Despite its great importance, commercial orchards rely on a limited number of varieties, which represents a high phytosanitary risk, therefore, diversification of the production base is essential to prevent problems already experienced by Brazilian citriculture (Oliveira et al., 2014).
In addition to the limited genetic base, environmental factors also pose challenges to production. In Brazil, most citrus orchards are not irrigated, and flowering generally occurs from August to September, a period of lower rainfall. This condition makes the use of drought-tolerant rootstocks and/or those more efficient under water restriction necessary. Given these conditions, the choice of rootstock becomes a critical factor in citriculture (Pompeu Junior, 2005).
Certain rootstocks can reduce canopy size by decreasing tree vigor (). Small citrus trees exhibit greater productive efficiency, allow higher planting densities, and consequently enable greater production per unit area. In addition, smaller tree size facilitates harvesting, inspection, spraying, and plant eradication in the control of HLB (Stuchi et al., 2012).
The reduction in scion development when grafted onto dwarfing rootstocks is associated with lower water potentials in leaves and stems compared to plants grafted onto vigorous rootstocks (). Dwarfing rootstocks have smaller root systems and, consequently, their roots absorb less water and nutrients from the soil (). Consequently, water transport within the plant may be restricted, leading to greater water deficit in dwarfing plants.
The rootstock Poncirus trifoliata var. monstrosa cv. ‘Flying Dragon’ is a widely used commercial dwarfing rootstock, however, it presents serious incompatibility issues with some scion cultivars and is susceptible to drought-induced water stress (Stuchi et al., 2003). Other dwarfing rootstocks derived from hybrids of trifoliate orange exist which represent alternatives for orchards under high-density planting systems ().
Hybrid selections have been developed in breeding programs in Spain () and in breeding programs conducted in Brazil by the Agronomic Institute (IAC) (Schinor et al., 2013) and by Embrapa (Ramos et al., 2015). The Sylvio Moreira Citrus Center/IAC has been conducting a citrus genetic breeding program based on controlled crosses since 1990. Populations of citrandarin hybrids (C. sunki × P. trifoliata cv. Rubidoux), selected using molecular markers, were established in different regions of the state of São Paulo. Some of these hybrids showed drought tolerance comparable to that of Rangpur lime and also conferred different plant sizes to the scion variety (; Schinor et al., 2013).
Recent studies indicate high potential in several IAC citrandarins. The citrandarin IAC 3152 Itajobi (H152) showed remarkable resilience to water stress, outperforming ‘Flying Dragon’ in water potential and photosynthetic efficiency (). The citrandarins Changsha × English Large (IAC 1711) and the citranges Troyer (IAC 385) and Carrizo (IAC 387) also show potential as rootstocks under rainfed conditions (Silva et al., 2025). Additionally, the citrandarin IAC 1600 proved to be more adapted to regions with limited water availability and high incidence of HLB (). These studies highlight the importance of developing new rootstock varieties and improving the characterization of existing ones.
In this regard, biotechnology has supported citrus breeding programs through controlled hybridization and the use of molecular markers in studies of genetic diversity, identification of zygotic and nucellar seedlings, genetic mapping, and marker-assisted selection (MAS) (; ).
In this context, high-throughput genotyping technologies stand out, such as the DArTseq™ platform (Diversity Arrays Technology–DArT), which combines genome complexity reduction methods with modern sequencing technologies, generating thousands of dominant markers distributed across the genome. In citrus, DArTseq markers have been used to construct highly dense genetic linkage maps for Citrus sunki and Poncirus trifoliata, contributing to the genetic improvement of the crop ().
Another relevant technique is Bulked Segregant Analysis (BSA) (Michelmore et al., 1991), which compares pools of individuals with contrasting phenotypes within a segregating population and genotyped with molecular markers that are polymorphic between the parents. With the emergence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, BSA approaches have drastically accelerated the process of gene identification (Schneeberger, 2014). In citrus, the BSA technique has been used to map a resistance locus for citrus nematode and for Alternaria brown spot (Xu et al., 2010; ).
The inheritance of the dwarfing trait was studied in a Flying Dragon progeny, in which the characteristic was determined by a dominant gene. In this study, BSA was used to identify three RAPD molecular markers linked to the dwarfing gene ().
These approaches, including the use of high-density molecular markers (such as DArTseq) and BSA-based strategies, have been successfully used to identify candidate genes for important traits. Song et al. (2017) used NGS and BSA to simultaneously detect two genes (qCC1 and qCC2) controlling cotyledon color in soybean. This method allows loci to be rapidly associated with candidate genomic regions.
New methods have been developed to accelerate and optimize the identification of genomic loci, such as QTL-seq (BSA QTL-seq), which uses genotype-guided bulk reconstruction through bioinformatics, allowing the simultaneous mapping of multiple traits from the same genotypic dataset (). In silico bulked segregant analysis (in silico BSA) is a computational approach that mimics traditional bulked segregant analysis using existing genotypic and phenotypic data, without the need to physically construct DNA bulks. In this method, individuals from a segregating population are virtually grouped (bulked) based on their phenotypes (e.g., extreme traits), and allele frequency differences between these digital bulks are analyzed using sequencing or marker data. By comparing these groups, researchers can identify genomic regions associated with traits of interest (QTLs) ().
The association between genes and phenotype represents an important step toward understanding the mechanisms involved in these traits. In this context, the breeding program genotyped the hybrid population of C. sunki × P. trifoliata and obtained genetic linkage maps with DArTseq markers and SNPs for P. trifoliata and C. sunki through Diversity Arrays Technology Pty Ltd (DArT P/L, Canberra, Australia) (). This same population was recently used to construct a high-density, multiplatform map and to identify HLB response QTLs in several trials (Santini-Gazaffi et al., submitted).
Despite the progress achieved in the development of new citrus rootstocks, the genetic architecture underlying drought tolerance and dwarfing remains poorly understood. Previous studies have characterized agronomic performance and stress responses of several citrandarin genotypes, and high-density genetic maps are available for the Citrus sunki × Poncirus trifoliata population. However, genomic regions associated with drought tolerance and canopy size control have not yet been systematically identified in this population using integrated phenotypic and genome-wide marker information. Furthermore, the application of in silico bulked segregant analysis (BSA) combined with DArTseq-derived markers for the dissection of these traits in citrus rootstocks remains largely unexplored.
The novelty of the present study lies in the integration of long-term field phenotyping data with high-density DArTseq genotyping and in silico BSA to identify genomic regions associated with drought tolerance and dwarfing in citrandarin rootstocks. To our knowledge, this is the first study to apply this combined approach in a segregating C. sunki × P. trifoliata population under field conditions, providing new insights into the genetic basis of two key traits for the development of resilient and high-density citrus production systems.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify genomic regions associated with drought tolerance and dwarfing in citrandarin rootstocks derived from C. sunki × P. trifoliata through the integration of field phenotypic evaluations, high-density molecular markers, and in silico bulked segregant analysis.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Experimental area
The experiment was established in 2013 in a municipality in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: Barretos (Northern Region/SP – Guanabara Farm, latitude 20°30’32.30” South and longitude 48°36’33.99” West, 536 m altitude, soil classified as Dystroferric Red Latosol, Aw climate, tropical).
Experiments were established with ‘Pera’ sweet orange grafted onto 20 rootstocks, including 17 citrandarins of C. sunki × P. trifoliata cv. Rubidoux and citrandarin IAC 1697 (C. sunki × P. trifoliata cv. Benecke). The Swingle citrumelo (SW) [C. paradisi Macfad. × P. trifoliata (L.) Raf.] and citrumelo W2 were evaluated as standard rootstock varieties (Table 1).
Table 1
| Abbreviation | Parents | Commercial name | RNC/MAPA |
|---|---|---|---|
| H18 | C. sunki x P. trifoliata cv. Rubidoux | – | |
| H26 | IAC 3026 Santamélia | 44688 | |
| H47 | – | ||
| H68 | – | ||
| H70 | – | ||
| H73 | – | ||
| H110 | – | ||
| H124 | – | ||
| H128 | IAC 3128 Guanabara | 44689 | |
| H137 | – | ||
| H139 | – | ||
| H148 | – | ||
| H150 | – | ||
| H151 | – | ||
| H152 | IAC 3152 Itajobi | 36027 | |
| H248 | – | ||
| H299 | IAC 3299 Muriti | 36025 | |
| IAC 1697 | C. sunki x P. trifoliata cv. Benecke | IAC 1697 | 21832 |
| SW | C. paradisi Macfad. x P. trifoliata (L.) Raf. | Citrumelo Swingle | – |
| W2 | Citrumelo Swingle W2 | – |
Rootstocks evaluated in the experiment, parents, commercial name, and registration number in the MAPA registry.
In both experiments, the experimental design was a randomized complete block with three replications and a variable number of plants per plot, spaced at 6.5 × 2.8 m (550 trees per hectare). For phenotypic evaluations, one representative plant per plot was used, totaling three biological replicates per genotype.
Plants were cultivated following the standard practices recommended for sweet orange production in Brazil, without pruning or fruit thinning. Weeds were controlled by mechanical mowing of natural vegetation (Brachiaria spp.) between rows, supplemented with herbicide applications along the planting rows. The experiment has been conducted under irrigation.
Environmental conditions were monitored, including precipitation and temperature (maximum, mean, and minimum), allowing characterization of contrasting water availability between years 2022 to 2025 (Figure 1). In Barretos (northern region of São Paulo), where July, August, and June had the lowest precipitation. Overall, precipitation was lower in 2024 compared to others years.
Figure 1
Based on the climatic data from northern region was slightly warmer and had lower precipitation levels, with March being the warmest month and May the coldest. These seasonal variations allowed the evaluation of plant performance under natural conditions of water restriction (deficit conditions), particularly during winter months.
2.2 Vegetative development
Plant development, represented by canopy volume (m³), was measured in 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 in three replications, with one plant per plot. The variable was determined using a graduated ruler by measuring plant height in meters (H) and canopy diameter (D), measured parallel to the ground at a height of 1.5 meters. Subsequently, canopy volume (V) was calculated using the following equation:
().
2.3 Drought tolerance
A visual assessment of drought tolerance was performed in 2022, 2024 and 2025 (winter). These assessments consisted of assigning visual scores based on the presence and/or absence of leaf curling characteristic of plants under water stress, with three repetitions per treatment, as used by Stuchi et al. (2000). Scores ranging from 1 to 3 were assigned, where: (1) significant leaf rolling, with or without a dry appearance; (2) slight leaf rolling, leaves slightly rolling; and (3) normal leaf blade, absence of leaf curling. For both analyses, three repetitions were used, one plant per plot, totaling three biological repetitions per genotype.
2.4 Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Scott-Knott mean comparison test with a significance level of α = 0.05. When necessary, a Box-Cox transformation () was applied to normalize the data distribution. The data analysis was conducted using R statistical software (version 4.4.2; Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) (R Core Team, 2024), utilizing the ExpDes.pt package () and the MASS package (Venables et al., 2002).
2.5 Selection of molecular markers
The search for genomic regions associated with dwarfing and drought tolerance traits was conducted using the Bulk Segregant Analysis (BSA) in silico approach (). The hibrids are part of a breeding program involving the segregating population derived from C. sunki × P. trifoliata, previously genotyped using DArTseq markers (), enabling the integration of phenotypic and molecular data. The DArTseq markers used were coded as 0 (absent) or 1 (present).
Plant selection for the construction of bulks related to induced tree size was performed using statistical data for the following traits: canopy height (m), canopy diameter (m), and canopy volume (m³). The selection considered groups that showed statistically significant differences according to the Scott–Knott test (α = 0.05).
For the selection of bulks associated with drought tolerance, the visual leaf curling score obtained in 2024 was used. Similarly, the selection of tolerant/intolerant bulks was performed considering groups with statistically significant differences according to the Scott–Knott test (p > 0.05), with group A classified as tolerant and group B as intolerant.
DArTseq markers association with phenotypic data was assessed by grouping the 17 evaluated hybrids into two bulks (A and B). These bulks were formed from groups with extreme values identified through analysis of variance and the Scott-Knott test for each evaluated trait. We calculated allele frequency (presence/absence) for each locus and determined the contrast between the frequencies of each bulk using the . This index, adapted from Takagi et al. (2013), is calculated as follows: . The statistical significance of the ΔAllele index was assessed using Fisher’s exact test (), with a significance level α = 0.05.
The selection of markers associated with plant size employed a conservative approach, focusing only on those markers associated with all the evaluated traits: height, diameter, and canopy volume. A Venn diagram (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/) was constructed using the molecular markers significantly associated with each trait, and only those corresponding to the intersection of the datasets were selected for subsequent analyses.
2.6 Annotation of sequences in Citrus genomes
After selecting DArTseq markers through in silico BSA, the marker sequences were aligned using BLASTn algorithm (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) against the Citrus sinensis reference genome (RefSeq ID GCF_022201045.2) available at the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) nonredundant (nr) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Gene sequences located closest to the selected markers were annotated using the Blast2GO software v. 6.0.3 ().
Similarity searches were performed using BLASTx against the NCBI nr database, applying a taxonomic filter for Viridiplantae (green plants) and an e-value cutoff of 1×10−5. Subsequently, the sequences were analyzed using InterProScan to identify conserved domains, followed by Gene Ontology (GO) term mapping and functional annotation based on the obtained GO candidates.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Vegetative development
Regarding tree height, ‘Pera’ sweet orange grafted onto H150, H248, H70, H151, H139, H124, and H18 did not differ from W2, showing greater plant height (≥3.5 m). For canopy volume, plants grafted onto H18, H124, H70, SB, H248, W2, H128, H139, and H151 did not differ from W2, exhibiting greater canopy volume (>30 m³).
In contrast, plants grafted onto H148, H110, H73, H68, H137, and H26 developed smaller trees, with heights up to 2.8 m. Plants grafted onto H110, H68, H137, and H26 induced lower canopy volume (≤20 m³). The rootstocks H18, H124, SB, H70, H128, W2, and H248 induced greater canopy diameter (Table 2).
Table 2
| Rootstock | Height (m) | Diameter (m) | Canopy volume (m3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| H18 | 3,50a | 4,73a | 41,45a |
| H26 | 2,17f | 3,67b | 15,27c |
| H47 | 3,00c | 4,07b | 26,02b |
| H68 | 2,63e | 3,67b | 18,56c |
| H70 | 3,70a | 4,33a | 36,37a |
| H73 | 2,80d | 3,93b | 22,67b |
| H110 | 2,83d | 3,73b | 20,70c |
| H124 | 3,53a | 4,47a | 36,92a |
| H128 | 3,40b | 4,27a | 32,73a |
| H137 | 2,53e | 3,60b | 17,25c |
| H139 | 3,57a | 4,07b | 30,88a |
| H148 | 2,87d | 3,87b | 22,42b |
| H150 | 3,73a | 3,67b | 26,75b |
| H151 | 3,63a | 4,00b | 30,69a |
| H152 | 3,30b | 3,80b | 25,19b |
| H248 | 3,70a | 4,13a | 33,68a |
| H299 | 3,10c | 4,00b | 26,01b |
| IAC 1697 | 3,37b | 4,47a | 35,54a |
| SW | 3,20b | 4,07b | 27,73b |
| W2 | 3,60a | 4,20a | 33,27a |
| CV (%) | 4,73 | 7,46 | 16,75 |
Height, canopy diameter, and canopy volume of ‘Pera’ sweet orange grafted onto 20 rootstocks in Barretos, (Northern Region) São Paulo State, Brazil, 2025.
Means followed by the same letter among rootstocks do not differ from each other according to the Scott–Knott test (p > 0.05).
Studies involving P. trifoliata rootstock and some of its hybrids have demonstrated their ability to reduce the height and canopy volume of ‘Valencia’ sweet orange under rainfed conditions (). According to Pompeu Junior (2005), a dwarfing rootstock is defined as one that results in a mature tree with a height of less than 2.5 m, regardless of the influence of climate, soil, or irrigation.
The SW citrumelo is a vigorous rootstock that induced greater canopy growth in ‘Valencia’ sweet orange (). According to Pompeu Junior and Blumer (2011), both SW and W2 rootstocks produced larger and more productive orange trees, with the same production efficiency as those grafted onto Rangpur lime. Therefore, it can be inferred that H18 and H128 are vigorous rootstock varieties, as they did not differ from the standard SW and W2 varieties and exhibited greater vigor regardless of location.
3.2 Drought tolerance
As observed in the climatic data presented in Figure 1, the northern region of São Paulo was under greater water deficit, particularly in 2024. In general, precipitation was lower in 2024 compared to others years. (Figure 1), which is reflected in leaf rolling scores values observed under these conditions (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Since June 2023, the citrus belt has been affected by the El Niño phenomenon, one of the five most intense events ever recorded. The combination of high temperatures, elevated evapotranspiration rates, and severe water deficit across the region resulted in a reduced number of fruits per tree ().
In ‘Pera’ sweet orange grafted onto the hybrids H18, H73, H139, H148, H150, H152, H248, H299 and SW exhibited greater drought tolerance based on visual assessment in 2024 (Table 3). These rootstocks received higher drought tolerance scores, reflecting lower levels of leaf curling. In contrast, H128, H151, H26, H68, H70, H110, W2, H124, H137 and H47 exhibited the lowest scores.
Table 3
| Rootstock | 2022 | 2024 | 2025 | Média |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H18 | 1,33b | 2,67a | 2,33a | 2,11a |
| H26 | 1,33b | 1,67b | 2,33a | 1,78a |
| H47 | 2,00a | 1,00b | 2,00a | 1,67a |
| H68 | 2,00a | 1,67b | 1,33a | 1,67a |
| H70 | 2,33a | 1,67b | 2,00a | 2,00a |
| H73 | 1,33b | 2,67a | 2,00a | 2,00a |
| H110 | 2,67a | 1,33b | 2,33a | 2,11a |
| H124 | 2,33a | 1,00b | 2,67a | 2,00a |
| H128 | 1,67b | 1,67b | 2,00a | 1,78a |
| H137 | 2,33a | 1,00b | 2,67a | 2,00a |
| H139 | 2,00a | 2,33a | 1,67a | 2,00a |
| H148 | 2,00a | 2,00a | 2,67a | 2,22a |
| H150 | 2,00a | 2,00a | 2,33a | 2,11a |
| H151 | 1,67b | 1,67b | 2,00a | 1,78a |
| H152 | 2,33a | 2,00a | 2,00a | 2,11a |
| H248 | 2,00a | 2,00a | 2,00a | 2,00a |
| H299 | 2,00a | 2,00a | 2,00a | 2,00a |
| IAC 1697 | 2,00a | 2,00a | 2,00a | 2,00a |
| SW | 1,67b | 2,00a | 2,00a | 1,89a |
| W2 | 2,00a | 1,33b | 2,00a | 1,78a |
| CV% | 23,01 | |||
Drought tolerance in ‘Pera’ sweet orange grafted onto different rootstocks (RS), evaluated based on leaf curling score in Barretos, São Paulo State, Brazil.
Means followed by the same letter among rootstocks do not differ from each other according to the Scott–Knott test (p > 0.05).
According to Schinor et al. (2013), scores ranging from 1.0 to 1.3 indicate high susceptibility, scores from 1.5 to 2.1 indicate moderate susceptibility, whereas scores between 2.2 and 3.0 indicate drought tolerance. In the same study, the citrandarins H152, H248, and H299 also exhibited high drought tolerance when used with ‘Pera’ sweet orange.
The female parent, C. sunki, was considered more tolerant, inducing higher drought tolerance scores in ‘Folha Murcha’ sweet orange. In contrast, the rootstock P. trifoliata ‘Flying Dragon’ conferred the lowest level of drought tolerance (). In Valencia sweet orange, Sunki mandarin and some of its hybrids induced greater drought tolerance (Stuchi et al., 2000; Pereira Costa et al., 2021).
3.3 Selection of DArTseq molecular markers
For the trait of drought stress tolerance, the hybrids H18, H73, H139, H148, H150, H152, H248, and H299 exhibited higher tolerance values, whereas H26, H68, H70, H128, H151, H110, H47, H124, and H137 showed lower values. These were selected to compose the tolerant and susceptible bulks, respectively. Among 27,960 DArTseq markers, it was possible to identify 12 markers through in silico Bulk Segregant Analysis (BSA) using Fisher’s exact test (Supplementary Table 1).
Regarding the canopy size induced by the rootstocks, significant markers were initially selected using Fisher’s exact test for the individual traits: tree height, canopy diameter, and canopy volume (Supplementary Table 1). Marker selection identified 368 markers putatively related with tree height, 259 with canopy diameter, and 380 with canopy volume. Among these markers, seven (7) were common to all three traits, as determined using a Venn diagram (Figure 3).
Figure 3
3.4 Functional annotation
Among the 12 significant molecular marker sequences putatively related with drought tolerance, seven aligned with gene sequences in the NCBI database of C. sinensis, and all sequences showed identity ≥ 89% (Table 4). Marker 100044107|F|0 presented multiple copies in the genome and was therefore not considered specific and was not used for annotation.
Table 4
| DArTseq | Chromosome location | Hit location | Direction | Score | Identity % | Gene ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Putatively associated with drought tolerance | ||||||
| 100026369|F|0 | Chr3 NC_068558.1 | 10.666M | forward | 84 | 97 | LOC112498199 |
| 100019255|F|0 | Chr4 NC_068559.1 | 26.612M | reverse | 129 | 100 | LOC102621883 |
| 100010748|F|0 | Chr9 NC_068564.1 | 7,550.7K | reverse | 86 | 100 | LOC102610219 |
| 100023347|F|0 | Chr2 NC_068557.1 | 3,400.5K | reverse | 97 | 92 | LOC112497242 |
| 100046832|F|0 | Chr7 NC_068562.1 | 1,231.9K | reverse | 117 | 97 | LOC107178890 |
| 100044107|F|0 | Chr1 NC_068564.1 | 2,997.8K | forward | 75 | 95 | KPL70_000629 |
| 100044107|F|0 | Chr9 NC_068564.1 | 6,987,0K | forward | 53 | 100 | LOC102617533 |
| 100023207|F|0 | Chr9 NC_068564.1 | 31,002M | reverse | 90 | 89 | KPL70_027387 |
| Putatively associated with dwarfing vigor | ||||||
| 100033871|F|0 | Chr2 NC_068557.1 | 25.234M | forward | 77 | 100 | LOC127900450 |
| 100009554|F|0 | Chr3 NC_068558.1 | 31.646M | reverse | 81 | 90 | LOC127898710 |
| 100010962|F|0 | Chr3 NC_068558.1 | 28.886M | reverse | 129 | 100 | KPL70_007989 |
| 100010962|F|0 | Chr3 NC_068558.1 | 28.991M | reverse | 119 | 98 | LOC112496823 |
| 100010962|F|0 | Chr3 NC_068558.1 | 28.487M | reverse | 106 | 94 | LOC107175105 |
| 100010962|F|0 | Chr3 NC_068558.1 | 28.672M | reverse | 95 | 91 | LOC107175243 |
| 100048650|F|0 | Chr3 NC_068558.1 | 16.190M | forward | 53 | 100 | LOC102619505 |
| 100053083|F|0 | Chr2 NC_068557.1 | 25.234M | forward | 77 | 100 | LOC127900450 |
| 100021565|F|0 | Chr3 NC_068558.1 | 41.749M | reverse | 103 | 95 | KPL70_009179 |
DArTseq molecular markers aligned to the Citrus sinensis reference genome (assembly DVS_A1.0) available at the NCBI database.
Among the seven significant molecular marker sequences putatively related with dwarfing traits, six aligned with gene sequences in the NCBI database of C. sinensis, and all sequences showed identity ≥ 91% (Table 4). Marker 100010962|F|0 aligned at more than one genomic position in C. sinensis; only sequences containing genes were annotated.
The gene sequences obtained from the C. sinensis genome were subjected to BLASTx analysis using the Blast2GO software against the NCBI nr database, with a taxonomic filter for Viridiplantae. The sequences were analyzed using InterProScan and generated Gene Ontology (GO) terms during the mapping step (Table 5 and Supplementary Table 2). Most BLAST hits corresponded to C. sinensis, followed by other Citrus species such as C. aurantifolia, C. unshiu, and C. clementina, with few hits in more distantly related species, as shown in Figure 4.
Table 5
| DArTseq associated marker | Description | Length | e-Value | Sim mean % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Putatively associated with drought tolerance | ||||
| 100026369|F|0 | protein kinase domain-containing protein | 12442 | 0.0 | 95.29 |
| 100019255|F|0 | polygalacturonase At1g48100 | 4547 | 8,86E-87 | 99.75 |
| 100010748|F|0 | putative disease resistance protein RGA3 | 5928 | 0.0 | 99.88 |
| 100023347|F|0 | Receptor-like protein 33 | 3234 | 0.0 | 99.68 |
| 100046832|F|0 | S-locus F-box protein | 1125 | 0.0 | 94.76 |
| 100023207|F|0 | Uncharacterized vacuolar membrane protein YML018C isoform X1 | 2096 | 7,26E-60 | 53.91 |
| Putatively associated with dwarfing vigor | ||||
| 100033871|F|0 | Agamous-like MADS-box protein AGL6 | 4186 | 8,06E-14 | 91.81 |
| 100009554|F|0 | ADP-ribosyl cyclase/cyclic ADP-ribose hydrolase | 10616 | 0.0 | 84.76 |
| 100010962|F|0 | ADP-ribosyl cyclase/cyclic ADP-ribose hydrolase | 13300 | 0.0 | 91.75 |
| 100010962|F|0 | Endonuclease | 97709 | 0.0 | 96.58 |
| 100010962|F|0 | hypothetical protein WN944_006731 | 81207 | 0.0 | 96.32 |
| 100010962|F|0 | ADP-ribosyl cyclase/cyclic ADP-ribose hydrolase | 6267 | 0.0 | 87.28 |
| 100048650|F|0 | Retrovirus-related Pol polyprotein from transposon TNT 1-94 | 26060 | 0.0 | 83.3 |
| 100053083|F|0 | Agamous-like MADS-box protein AGL6 | 4186 | 8,06E-14 | 91.81 |
| 100021565|F|0 | serine/threonine-protein kinase At3g07070 | 4976 | 2,26E-142 | 70.77 |
Summary of the functional annotation of genes putatively related to drought tolerance and vigor reduction in citrandarins.
Figure 4
3.4.1 Markers putatively associated with drought tolerance
In general, C. sunki has been associated with greater adaptation to water deficit conditions. Studies on C. sunki selections have demonstrated their potential for drought tolerance, such as ‘Sunki Tropical’ and ‘Sunki Maravilha’ (Neves et al., 2013; Santana-Vieira et al., 2016; Sousa et al., 2022). Thus, it can be inferred that the markers identified in this study may be associated with genetic mechanisms involved in tolerance to water deficit.
The functional annotation of the gene co-localized with marker 100026369|F|0 revealed an annotation corresponding to a protein kinase. Protein kinases are enzymes that phosphorylate other proteins using ATP. There are several types of kinases that are active at different stages of the cell cycle (Taiz and Zeiger, 2017). Protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events are important signaling processes induced by osmotic stress in higher plants. SNF1-related protein kinase 2 (SnRK2), SRK2C, is an osmotic stress-activated protein kinase in Arabidopsis thaliana that can significantly impact drought tolerance in Arabidopsis plants (Umezawa et al., 2004).
A gene associated with marker 100019255|F|0 showed similarity to polygalacturonase At1g48100. Polygalacturonases belong to the glycosyl hydrolase family and are essential homogalacturonan (HG)-hydrolyzing enzymes involved in several plant developmental processes, such as cell elongation, organ abscission, fruit ripening, microspore release, and pollen tube growth (). Polygalacturonases (PGs) modify pectins to regulate cell wall chemistry and mechanics, thereby influencing plant development (Safran et al., 2023). In Arabidopsis thaliana, deletion or overexpression of PGX3 (At1g48100) affects both cotyledon shape and the spacing and dimensions of developing stomatal pores. Loss of PGX3 impairs proper stomatal closure, while overexpression accelerates stomatal opening (Rui et al., 2017).
The gene linked to marker 100010748|F|0 was annotated as a putative disease resistance protein RGA3, a gene associated with biotic stress and involved in defense responses against other organisms. Plants possess efficient mechanisms to detect and respond to pathogen infections, such as resistance gene analogs (RGAs), which are considered potential resistance (R) genes. These genes contain conserved domains and features that play specific roles in pathogen defense (Sekhwal et al., 2015). RGA markers have already been used in Citrus for the identification, tagging, and mapping of disease resistance genes in hybrids of C. unshiu and C. nobilis (Ragayatsu et al., 2014).
Marker 100023347|F|0 was co-localized with a gene annotated as Receptor-like protein 33. Receptor-like proteins (RLPs) are cell surface receptors that play a role in disease resistance in several plant species. In addition, RLPs may be involved in plant development, such as regulating stomatal distribution (TMM) and maintaining the meristem in Arabidopsis (Wang et al., 2008).
The gene associated with marker 100046832|F|0 was annotated as S-locus F-box protein. The S-locus controls self-incompatibility and contains S determinants from the pistil and pollen. In Rutaceae, pollen S determinants generally comprise one or more F-box genes closely linked to S-RNase ().
F-box proteins belong to one of the largest protein families in plants and are involved in the regulation of many essential physiological processes, including the growth and development of roots, leaves, stems, flowers, and fruits, as well as responses to biotic and abiotic stresses (Xu et al., 2021). Regarding root development, some proteins from this family (MAX2) can inhibit primary root growth and promote root hair development (). Additionally, through auxin signaling, F-box genes (CEGENDUO) inhibited lateral root formation in Arabidopsis ().
Finally, a gene co-localized with marker 100023207|F|0 was annotated as an uncharacterized protein, Uncharacterized vacuolar membrane protein YML018C isoform X1. The YML018C protein from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has not yet had its function determined. High-throughput studies have reported that this protein is localized in the vacuolar membrane (Sturgeon et al., 2021).
Evaluating drought tolerance induced by ‘Rangpur’ lime rootstock in sweet orange (C. sinensis), it was possible to verify the transcriptional activation of genes related to soluble sugar accumulation, antioxidant metabolism, cell wall processes, biotic and abiotic stress responses, transcription factors, protein kinases, and abscisic acid (ABA) signaling, as well as the downregulation of genes associated with photosynthetic light reactions, starch metabolism, and ethylene signaling (). These results highlight the complexity of molecular responses associated with adaptation to water deficit in citrus.
Although drought tolerance mechanisms in citrus depend on the maintenance of cellular structures and metabolic processes, it is important to emphasize that the signaling, regulatory, and functional genes that confer drought tolerance are still not fully understood in citrus (). Our results indicate mechanisms related to stress signaling and perception, as well as cellular adjustment and development.
3.4.2 Markers putatively associated with dwarfing growth habit
The male parental P. trifoliata has been associated with the induction of reduced canopy size. It is considered a dwarfing rootstock, as scions grafted onto it exhibit relatively small stature; however, it is more sensitive to drought than most rootstocks (Pompeu Junior, 2005). Thus, the genes annotated in this study may be related to mechanisms involved in the induction of reduced scion growth.
Among the putatively associated markers, markers 100033871|F|0 and 100053083|F|0 were co-localized with a gene annotated as Agamous-like MADS-box protein AGL6.The MADS-box gene family is fundamental to several aspects of plant biology, particularly growth, development, and environmental adaptation, playing a role in the regulation of genes related to flowering, fruit ripening, and stress tolerance (Zhang et al., 2024). The AGAMOUS-like6 (AGL6) gene is a subfamily of MADS-box genes required for floral development in wheat ().
However, recent studies have demonstrated that the functions of this subfamily are more extensive. A meta-analysis of the MADS-box gene family found that some members exert a more indirect effect on root growth and development. In that study, AGL6 was also associated with leaf movement, a process involved in regulating the plant circadian clock, and was found to be expressed in pollen and seeds, indicating a role at different stages of plant development ().
Beyond its role in floral development, MADS-box family genes in Arabidopsis have been shown to promote root elongation while also acting as inhibitors of root growth, potentially being involved in root architecture (). In alfalfa (Medicago sativa), AGL6, together with SPL12 (SQUAMOSA-PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE), forms a genetic module that regulates root development and nodule formation (Nasrollahi et al., 2022).
Transgenic Arabidopsis plants with ectopic expression of OMADS1 (an AGL6 homolog) exhibited significantly reduced plant size, markedly early flowering, and loss of inflorescence indeterminacy. However, these effects were observed under artificial expression conditions, which complicates their interpretation ().
The genes associated with markers 100009554|F|0 and 100010962|F|0 were annotated with terms related to ADP-ribosyl cyclase/cyclic ADP-ribose hydrolase. This enzyme is involved in the production and degradation of cADPR (cyclic ADP-ribose), a signaling molecule derived from NAD+;. cADPR acts as a second messenger, primarily associated with intracellular Ca²+; mobilization ().
Cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR) was identified as a signaling molecule involved in the response to the hormone abscisic acid (ABA) and was shown to exert its effects through calcium signaling. Experiments demonstrated that cADPR levels in Arabidopsis plants increased in response to ABA treatment and prior to ABA-induced gene expression (Wu et al., 1997). The cADPR pathway is important for the regulation of gene expression in plants. Treatment of plant cells with the hormone ABA increased cADPR levels, activating specific genes. Another important function in plants, in which cADPR plays a role, is mediating the activation of genes involved in defense against pathogens ().
The gene linked to marker 100048650|F|0 was annotated as Retrovirus-related Pol polyprotein from transposon TNT 1-94. Transposable elements, or transposons, represent important components of plant genomes and may contribute to genetic variability and the regulation of gene expression. Transposons, also known as “jumping genes,” have the capacity to insert a copy of themselves into a new location within the genome, moving from one position to another (Taiz and Zeiger, 2017).
A marker (100021565|F|0) was co-localized with a gene annotated as serine/threonine-protein kinase At3g07070 (PBL26). Protein kinases are enzymes that catalyze the phosphorylation of other proteins by adding a phosphate group from ATP, thereby modifying their properties. In plants, kinases act in signal transduction pathways related to growth, development, and responses to environmental stimuli (Taiz and Zeiger, 2017).
This gene may be involved in plant growth and development (). In Arabidopsis, this kinase plays a crucial role in signal transduction that triggers pollen tube rupture. In angiosperms, the pollen tube enters the receptive synergid cell, where it ruptures to release the sperm cells. These genes encode proteins localized in the plasma membrane, and their deletion causes delayed pollen tube rupture (Xu et al., 2024).
The genetics underlying tree size control in dwarf citrus varieties are still not fully understood. Different physiological mechanisms have been reported, including the involvement of plant hormones such as gibberellins, auxins, brassinosteroids, and abscisic acid, which appear to have a strong relationship with the regulation of this trait ().
In ‘Flying Dragon’ and P. trifoliata, a potential mechanism regulating the dwarfing phenotype has been identified, associated with phytohormone signal transduction, sugar and starch degradation, lignin synthesis, and cellulose and hemicellulose degradation processes. In addition, several transcription factors, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and alternative splicing (AS) events have been identified, which may act as important contributors to the regulation of stem elongation and development in slow-growing rootstocks (). In this study, the genes co-localized with the identified candidate molecular markers were related to protein kinases, MADS-box transcription factors, and cellular signaling.
Although the results obtained allow us to identify possible genomic regions putatively associated with the evaluated characteristics, it is important to emphasize that the associations identified in this study are exploratory in nature, since they are based on correlative evidence. Thus, we highlight candidate genes with biologically plausible functions previously reported in the literature, avoiding excessive generalizations. However, further validation is needed to confirm these associations.
4 Conclusion
The rootstocks H248, H70, H151, H139, H124, H18, and W2 induced greater height (≥3.5 m) and larger canopy volume (>30 m³) in ‘Pera’ sweet orange. In contrast, the citrandarin hybrids H110, H68, H137, and H26 produced shorter plants (≤2.8 m) and, consequently, smaller canopy volume (≤20 m³).
The rootstocks H18, H73, H139, H148, H150, H152, H248, H299, and SW exhibited better drought tolerance scores. Conversely, H128, H151, H26, H68, H70, H110, W2, H124, H137, and H47 showed the poorest scores.
Overall, the more vigorous rootstocks displayed greater tolerance to water deficit, whereas the dwarfing rootstocks proved less tolerant. Noteworthy are the citrandarin hybrids H152, H148, H73, and H299, which combined reduced vigor with increased drought tolerance, making them suitable for high-density planting.
The integrated approach of field phenotyping and in silico BSA combined with DArTseq markers enabled the detection of 12 molecular markers potentially associated with the agronomic traits of interest. Of these, six were related to dwarfing habit and six to drought tolerance.
Functional annotation of the genes co-localized with the markers revealed candidate genes involved in processes such as stress signaling, hormonal regulation, cellular adjustment, defense responses, and plant development.
The genes associated with drought tolerance are related to stress signaling (protein kinases), cell wall modification (polygalacturonases), disease resistance (RGA3, RLPs), and hormonal regulation (F-box proteins). For the dwarfing trait, the identified genes are linked to developmental regulation (MADS-box transcription factors), calcium signaling (ADP-ribosyl cyclase), and signal transduction (serine/threonine-protein kinases).
These findings point to multigenic and multifactorial control of the phenotype, indicating that drought tolerance and vegetative growth regulation are complex traits, likely governed by more than one gene. However, the marker–trait associations identified here are exploratory in nature and require further validation to confirm the contribution of these genes.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
FR: Visualization, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Formal Analysis, Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. LS-G: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Software, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Data curation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Validation, Conceptualization, Visualization. Ad: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Formal Analysis, Data curation. FD: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Formal Analysis. GC: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. TM: Investigation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. FD: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Data curation, Project administration, Visualization, Validation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Conceptualization, Supervision. MY: Data curation, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Project administration, Formal Analysis, Validation, Resources.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) - 88887.695137/2022-00, INCT-Citros (FAPESP 2014/50880-0 and CNPq 465440/2014-2), the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) - 2020/07045-3, and INCT Citros III (FAPESP 2025/27032-7 and CNPq 408825/2024-3).
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.1857861/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AdhikariP. B.KasaharaR. D. (2024). An overview on MADS box members in plants: A meta-review. Int. J. Mol. Sci.25, 8233. doi: 10.3390/IJMS25158233/S1
2
BelloM. H.MoghaddamS. M.MassoudiM.McCleanP. E.CreganP. B.MiklasP. N. (2014). Application of in silico bulked segregant analysis for rapid development of markers linked to Bean common mosaic virusresistance in common bean. BMC Genomics15, 903. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-903
3
BoxG. E. P.CoxD. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc Ser. B. Methodol.26, 211–252. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x
4
Cantuarias-AvilésT.Mourão FilhoF. D. A. A.StuchiE. S.da SilvaS. R.Espinoza-NuñezE. (2011). Horticultural performance of 'Folha Murcha' sweet orange onto twelve rootstocks. Sci. Hortic.129, 259–265. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.03.039
5
CarbonnelS.DasD.VarshneyK.KolodziejM. C.Villaécija-AguilarJ. A.GutjahrC. (2020). The karrikin signaling regulator SMAX1 controls Lotus japonicus root and root hair development by suppressing ethylene biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.117, 21757–21765. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006111117
6
Castañón-SuárezC. A.ArrizubietaM.Castelán-MuñozN.Sánchez-RodríguezD. B.Caballero-CorderoC.Zluhan-MartínezE.et al. (2024). The MADS-box genes SOC1 and AGL24 antagonize XAL2 functions in Arabidopsis thaliana root development. Front. Plant Sci.15, 1331269. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1331269
7
ChengS. F.RooseM. L. (1995). Origin and inheritance of dwarfing by the Citrus rootstock Poncirus trifoliata ‘Flying Dragon’. J. Am. Soc. For. Hortic. Sci.120, 286–291. doi: 10.21273/JASHS.120.2.286
8
ChoiJ.-H.OhM.-H. (2025). Role of tyrosine phosphorylation in PEP1 receptor 1 (PEPR1) in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants14, 1515. doi: 10.3390/plants14101515
9
ChuL.LiuD.LiC.LiuJ. H. (2025). Dwarfing of fruit trees: from old cognitions to new insights. Horticulture Adv.3, 1–3. doi: 10.1007/S44281-025-00063-W
10
ConesaA.GötzS.García-GómezJ. M.TerolJ.TalónM.RoblesM. (2005). Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics21, 3674–3676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610
11
Cristofani-YalyM.BastianelM.FaldoniL.BlumerS.Pompeu JuniorJ.CamposT. M. P.et al. (2007). Seleção de citrandarins (Tangerina Sunki vs. Poncirus trifoliata) para porta-enxertos de citros. Laranja28, 71–79.
12
CuencaJ.AlezaP.VicentA.BrunelD.OllitraultP.NavarroL. (2013). Genetically based location from triploid populations and gene ontology of a 3.3-Mb genome region linked to Alternaria brown spot resistance in citrus reveal clusters of resistance genes. PLoS One8, e76755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076755
13
CurtoloM.Cristofani-YalyM.GazaffiR.TakitaM. A.FigueiraA.MaChadoM. A. (2017). QTL mapping for fruit quality in Citrus using DArTseq markers. BMC Genomics18, 289. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3629-2
14
CurtoloM.SorattoT. A. T.GazaffiR.TakitaM. A.MaChadoM. A.Cristofani-YalyM. (2018). High-density linkage maps for Citrus sunki and Poncirus trifoliata using DArTseq markers. Tree Genet. Genomes14, 5. doi: 10.1007/s11295-017-1218-9
15
DahroB.LiC.LiuJ. H. (2023). Overlapping responses to multiple abiotic stresses in citrus: from mechanism understanding to genetic improvement. Horticulture Adv.1, 4. doi: 10.1007/S44281-023-00007-2
16
De SouzaA. J. B.Cristofani-YalyM.da ConceiçãoP. M.DeviteF. T.BastianelM.RomeroP. V. S.et al. (2025). Physiological and productivity responses of Tahiti acid lime grafted onto dwarfing rootstocks under different planting and mulching practices. Front. Sustain. Food. Syst.9, 1489291. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1489291
17
DeviteF. T.BastianelM.Cristofani-YalyM.de SouzaA. J. B.GadanhotoB. P.Costa ArantesA. C.et al. (2025). Performance of Valencia sweet orange grafted onto dwarfing citrandarins. Front. Plant Sci.16, 1530396. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1530396
18
DominguesA. R.MarcoliniC. D. M.GonçalvesC. H. D. S.De ResendeJ. T. V.RobertoS. R.CarlosE. F. (2021). Rootstocks genotypes impact on tree development and industrial properties of ‘valencia’ sweet orange juice. Horticulturae.7, 141. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7060141
19
DonadioL. C.LedermanI. E.RobertoS. R.StucchiE. S. (2019). Dwarfing-canopy and rootstock cultivars for fruit trees. Rev. Bras. Frutic41, e–997. doi: 10.1590/0100-29452019997
20
DongL.WangL.ZhangY.ZhangY.DengX.XueY. (2006). An auxin-inducible F-box protein CEGENDUO negatively regulates auxin-mediated lateral root formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol.60, 599–615. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-5257-5
21
EspositoS.D’AgostinoN.TarantoF.FaniaF.PavanS.ColellaI.et al. (2026). Reverse BSA-QTLseq: A new genotype-driven bioinformatics approach for simultaneous trait mapping. Plant Commun.7, 101588. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101588
22
FerreiraE. B.CavalcantiP. P.NogueiraD. A. (2021). Expdes.Pt: Pacote Experimental Designs (Portugues). Available online at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ExpDes.pt.
23
FisherR. A. (1922). On the interpretation of χ² from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. J. R. Stat. Soc85, 87–94. doi: 10.2307/2340521
24
FUNDECITRUS (2024). Inventário De Árvores do Cinturão Citrícola De São Paulo E Triângulo/Sudoeste Mineiro: Retrato Dos Pomares Em Março De 2024 (Araraquara: Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura), 158.
25
GonçalvesL. P.Boscariol CamargoR. L.TakitaM. A.MaChadoM. A.dos Soares FilhoW. S.CostaM. G. C. (2019). Rootstock-induced molecular responses associated with drought tolerance in sweet orange as revealed by RNA-Seq. BMC Genomics20110. doi: 10.1186/S12864-019-5481-Z
26
GonzattoM. P.GriebelerS. R.SchwarzS. F. (2022). “ Dwarfing rootstocks for high-density citrus orchards,” in Fruit Industry. Eds. Kahramanoğluİ.WanC. ( IntechOpen, London), 73–87. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.102851
27
GuQ.WeiQ.HuY.ChenM.ChenZ.ZhengS.et al. (2023). Physiological and full-length transcriptome analyses reveal the dwarfing regulation in trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata L.). Plants12, 271. doi: 10.3390/plants12020271
28
GuseA. H. (2000). “ The Ca²+;-mobilizing second messenger cyclic ADP-ribose,” in Calcium: The Molecular Basis of Calcium Action in Biology and Medicine. Eds. PochetR.DonatoR.HaiechJ.HeizmannC.GerkeV. ( Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht), 109–128. doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0688-0_7
29
HadfieldK. A.BennettA. B. (1998). Polygalacturonases: many genes in search of a function. Plant Physiol.117, 337–343. doi: 10.1104/pp.117.2.337
30
HayatF.LiJ.IqbalS.PengY.HongL.BalalR. M.et al (2022). A mini review of citrus rootstocks and their role in high-density orchards. Plants11, 2876. doi: 10.3390/plants11212876
31
HsuH. F.HuangC. H.ChouL. T.YangC. H. (2003). Ectopic expression of an orchid (Oncidium Gower Ramsey) AGL6-like gene promotes flowering by activating flowering time genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol.44, 783–794. doi: 10.1093/PCP/PCG099
32
IBGE (2026). Produção Agrícola Mundial. Available online at: https://www.ibge.gov.br (Accessed January 20, 2026).
33
KongX.WangF.GengS.GuanJ.TaoS.JiaM.et al. (2022). The wheat AGL6-like MADS-box gene is a master regulator for floral organ identity and a target for spikelet meristem development manipulation. Plant Biotechnol. J.20, 75–88. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13696
34
LeeH. C. (2001). Physiological functions of cyclic ADP-ribose and NAADP as calcium messengers. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.41, 317–345. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.317
35
LiangM.CaoZ.ZhuA.LiuY.TaoM.YangH.et al. (2020). Evolution of self-compatibility by a mutant S-RNase in citrus. Nat. Plants6, 131–142. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0597-3
36
LimaR. P. M.CurtoloM.MerfaM. V.Cristofani-YalyM.MaChadoM. A. (2018). QTLs and eQTLs mapping related to citrandarins’ resistance to citrus gummosisdisease. BMC Genomics19, 516. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4888-2
37
Martínez-CuencaM.-R.Primo-CapellaA.Forner-GinerM. A. (2016). “ Influence of rootstock on citrus tree growth: Effects on photosynthesis and carbohydrate distribution, plant size, yield, fruit quality, and dwarfing genotypes,” in Plant Growth. Ed. RigobeloE. C. ( IntechOpen, London). doi: 10.5772/64825
38
MendelK. (1956). Roostock-scion relationships in Shamouti trees on light soil. Katavim: Records Agric. Res. Station.6, 35–38.
39
MichelmoreR. W.ParanI.KesseliR. V. (1991). Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.88, 9828–9832. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.88.21.9828
40
NasrollahiV.YuanZ. C.LuQ. S. M.McDowellT.KohalmiS. E.HannoufaA. (2022). Deciphering the role of SPL12 and AGL6 from a genetic module that functions in nodulation and root regeneration in Medicago sativa. Plant Mol. Biol.110, 511–529. doi: 10.1007/S11103-022-01303-7
41
NevesD. M.FilhoM. A. C.BelleteB. S.SilvaM. F. G. F.SouzaD. T.Soares FilhoW. S.et al. (2013). Comparative study of putative 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase and abscisic acid accumulation in the responses of Sunki mandarin and Rangpur lime to water deficit. Mol. Biol. Rep.40, 5339–5349. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2634-z
42
OliveiraR. P.Soares FilhoW. S.MaChadoM. A.FerreiraE. A.ScivittaroW. B.GesteiraA. S. (2014). Melhoramento Genético De Plantas Cítricas (Belo Horizonte: EMBRAPA) Vol. 35. 22–29.
43
Pereira CostaD.StuchiE. S.GirardiE. A.MoreiraA. S.da Silva GesteiraA.Coelho FilhoM. A.et al. (2021). Less is more: a hard way to get potential dwarfing hybrid rootstocks for Valencia sweet orange. Agriculture11, 354. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11040354
44
Pompeu JuniorJ. (2005). “ Rootstocks,” in Citros. Eds. MattosD.De NegriJ. D.PioR. M.Pompeu JuniorJ. ( Instituto Agronômico; Fundag, Campinas, Brazil), 61–104.
45
Pompeu JuniorJ.BlumerS. (2011). Citrumelos como porta-enxertos para a laranjeira “Valência. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras.46, 105–107. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2011000100014
46
RagayatsuD. P. P.SulistyowatiL.AiniL. Q.MartasariC. (2014). Genetic characterization of diplodia resistant in somatic hybrids of Citrus unshiu and Citrus nobilis using resistance gene analogue (RGA). J. Agric. Veterinary Sci.7, 61–70. doi: 10.9790/2380-07146170
47
RamosY. C.StuchiE. S.GirardiE. A.LeãoH. C.GesteiraA. S.PassosO. S.et al. (2015). Dwarfing rootstocks for “Valencia” sweet orange. Acta Hortic.1065, 351–354. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1065.42
48
R Core Team (2024). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Available online at: http://www.R-project.org/.
49
RuiY.XiaoC.YiH.KandemirB.WangJ. Z.PuriV. M.et al. (2017). Polygacturonase involved in expansion3 functions in seedling development, rosette growth, and stomatal dynamics in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell29, 2413–2432. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00568
50
SafranJ.TabiW.UngV.LemaireA.HabryloO.BouckaertJ.et al. (2023). Plant polygalacturonase structures specify enzyme dynamics and processivities to fine-tune cell wall pectins. Plant Cell35, 3073–3091. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad134
51
Santana-VieiraD. D. S.FreschiL.da Hora AlmeidaL. A.MoraesD. H. S.NevesD. M.dos SantosL. M.et al. (2016). Survival strategies of citrus rootstocks subjected to drought. Sci. Rep.6, 38775. doi: 10.1038/srep38775
52
Santini-GazaffiL.GazaffiR.AquinoS. O.GrattapagliaD.BastianelM.Cristofani-YalyM.et al.Multi-platform genetic mapping reveals QTLs associated with HLB response in Citrus sunki × Poncirus trifoliata Front. Plant Sci. [Submitted].
53
SchinorE. H.Cristofani-YalyM.BastianelM.MaChadoM. A. (2013). Sunki mandarin vs Poncirus trifoliata hybrids as rootstocks for Pera sweet orange. J. Agric. Sci.5, 190–200. doi: 10.5539/jas.v5n6p190
54
SchneebergerK. (2014). Using next-generation sequencing to isolate mutant genes from forward genetic screens. Nat. Rev. Genet.15, 662–676. doi: 10.1038/nrg3745
55
SekhwalM. K.LiP.LamI.WangX.CloutierS.YouF. M. (2015). Disease resistance gene analogs (RGAs) in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci.16, 19248–19290. doi: 10.3390/ijms160819248
56
SilvaL. N.VitóriaM. F.MoreiraA. S.GirardiE. A.StuchiE. S. (2025). IAC 1711 citrandarin, tetraploid citranges and Flying Dragon trifoliate as potential graft-compatible rootstocks for Pera IAC sweet orange tree. Bragantia84, e20240094. doi: 10.1590/1678-4499.20240094
57
SongJ.LiZ.LiuZ.GuoY.QiuL. J. (2017). Next-generation sequencing from bulked-segregant analysis accelerates the simultaneous identification of two qualitative genes in soybean. Front. Plant Sci.8, 1. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00919
58
SousaA. R. O.SilvaE. M. A.FilhoM. A. C.CostaM. G. C.FilhoW. S. S.MicheliF.et al. (2022). Metabolic responses to drought stress and rehydration in leaves and roots of three citrus scion/rootstock combinations. Sci. Hortic.292, 110490. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110490
59
StuchiE. S.DonadioL. C.SempionatoO. R. (2000). Drought sensibility of “Folha Murcha” sweet orange on ten rootstocks. Rev. Bras. Fruticultura22, 454–457.
60
StuchiE. S.DonadioL. C.SempionatoO. R. (2003). Performance of Tahiti lime on Poncirus trifoliata var. monstrosa Flying Dragon in four densities. Fruits58, 13–17. doi: 10.1051/FRUITS:2002032
61
StuchiE. S.GirardiE. A.SempionatoO. R.ReiffE. T.SilvaS. R.ParolinL. G. (2012). “ Trifoliata ‘Flying Dragon’: Porta-Enxerto Para Plantios Adensados e Irrigados de Laranjeiras Doces de Alta Produtividade e Sustentabilidade,” in Cruz Das Almas, vol. 152. (Cruz da Almas, BA: Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura).
62
SturgeonC. M.ZanghiN.SmithH. M.DavisE. K.RobinsonM. R.CabreraE.et al. (2021). YML018C protein localizes to the vacuolar membrane independently of Atg27p. microPubl. Biol. doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000391
63
TaizL.ZeigerE. (2017). Fisiologia E Desenvolvimento Vegetal. 6th Edn (Porto Alegre: Artmed).
64
TakagiH.AbeA.YoshidaK.KosugiS.NatsumeS.MitsuokaC.et al. (2013). QTL-seq: rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J.74, 174–183. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12105
65
UmezawaT.YoshidaR.MaruyamaK.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK.ShinozakiK. (2004). SRK2C, a SNF1-related protein kinase 2, improves drought tolerance by controlling stress-responsive gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.101, 17306–17311. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.0407758101
66
VenablesW. N.RipleyB. D.VenablesW. N. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics With s. 4th ed (New York: Springer). Available online at: https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/.
67
WangG.EllendorffU.KempB.MansfieldJ. W.ForsythA.MitchellK.et al. (2008). A genome-wide functional investigation into the roles of receptor-like proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.147, 503–517. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.119487
68
WuY.KuzmaJ.MarechalE.GraeffR.LeeH. C.FosterR.et al. (1997). Abscisic acid signaling through cyclic ADP-ribose in plants. Science278, 2126–2130. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5346.2126
69
XuY. J.LuoT.ZhouP. M.WangW. Q.YangW. C.LiH. J. (2024). Pollen-expressed RLCKs control pollen tube burst. Plant Commun.5, 100920. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.100934
70
XuK.WuN.YaoW.LiX.ZhouY.LiH. (2021). The biological function and roles in phytohormone signaling of the F-box protein in plants. Agronomy11, 2360. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11112360
71
XuX.Zhan’aoD.QifaZ.ChenC.GmitterF. G. J. (2010). Developing specific markers and improving genetic mapping for a major locus Tyr1 of citrus nematode resistance. Bioscience Methods1, 497–504. doi: 10.5376/BM.2010.01.0001
72
ZhangZ.ZouW.LinP.WangZ.ChenY.YangX.et al. (2024). Evolution and function of MADS-box transcription factors in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci.25, 13278. doi: 10.3390/ijms252413278
Summary
Keywords
blast, citrandarins, drought tolerance, Poncirus trifoliata cv. Rubidoux, SilicoDArT
Citation
Roverssi F, Santini-Gazaffi L, de Souza AJB, Devite FT, Colombo GH, Monteiro TP, de Azevedo FA and Cristofani-Yaly M (2026) DArTseq molecular markers associated with water stress tolerance and size reduction in citrandarins rootstocks. Front. Plant Sci. 17:1857861. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2026.1857861
Received
16 April 2026
Revised
03 July 2026
Accepted
16 July 2026
Published
10 August 2026
Volume
17 - 2026
Edited by
Sergio Ruffo Roberto, State University of Londrina, Brazil
Reviewed by
Panagiotis Madesis, University of Thessaly, Greece
Nirmala Devy, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Roverssi, Santini-Gazaffi, de Souza, Devite, Colombo, Monteiro, de Azevedo and Cristofani-Yaly.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fernanda Roverssi, fer_roverssi@hotmail.com; Mariângela Cristofani-Yaly, mariangela@ccsm.br
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.