AUTHOR=Barbaree Howard E. , Mathias Krista , Fries Brant E. , Brown Greg P. , Stewart Shannon L. , Ham Elke , Hirdes John P. 

TITLE=The Forensic Supplement to the interRAI Mental Health Assessment Instrument: Evaluation and Validation of the Problem Behavior Scale

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychiatry

VOLUME=Volume 12 - 2021

YEAR=2021

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.769034

DOI=10.3389/fpsyt.2021.769034

ISSN=1664-0640

ABSTRACT=Background:  Numerous validation studies support the use of the interRAI Mental Health (MH) assessment system for inpatient mental health assessment, triage, treatment planning, and outcome measurement. However, there have been suggestions that the interRAI MH does not include sufficient content relevant to forensic mental health.  We address this potential deficiency through the development of a Forensic Supplement (FS) to the interRAI MH system.  Using three forensic risk assessment instruments (PCL-R; HCR-20; VRAG) that had a record of independent cross validation in the forensic literature, we identified forensic content domains that were missing in the interRAI MH.  We then independently developed items to provide forensic coverage. The resulting FS is a single-page, 19-item supplementary document that can be scored along with the interRAI MH, adding approximately 10-15 minutes to administration time.

Method:  We constructed the Problem Behavior Scale (PBS) using 11 items from the interRAI MH and FS.  The Developmental Sample, 168 forensic mental health inpatients from two large mental health specialty hospitals, was assessed with both an earlier version of the interRAI MH and FS.  This sample also provided us access to scores on the– the PCL-R, the HCR-20 and the VRAG.  To validate our initial findings, we sought additional samples where scoring of the interRAI MH and the FS had been done.  The first, the Forensic Sample (N = 587), consisted of forensic inpatients in other mental health units/hospitals.  The second, the Correctional Sample (N = 618) was a random, representative sample of inmates in prisons, and the third, the Youth Sample (N = 90) comprised a group of youth in police custody. 
    

Conclusions:  The FS improves the interRAI MH’s ability to identify risk for negative patient experiences and assess clinical needs in hospitalized/incarcerated forensic patients. These results generalize across age groups and across health care and correctional settings.