AUTHOR=Ma Chenyi , Wang Zhe , Li Chuanwei , Lu Jing , Long Jiang , Li Ruihua , Wu Qianying , Jiang Haifeng , Du Jiang , Li Runji , Wang Peiyan , Ma Limin , Li Hongwei , Hui Shuqin , Zhao Wenli , Zhong Na , Zhao Min 

TITLE=The Clinical Consistency and Utility of ICD-11 Diagnostic Guidelines for Gaming Disorder: A Field Study Among the Chinese Population

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychiatry

VOLUME=Volume 12 - 2021

YEAR=2021

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.781992

DOI=10.3389/fpsyt.2021.781992

ISSN=1664-0640

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Purpose:</bold> As a new category proposed in the <italic>International Classification of Diseases</italic> (11th Revision) (ICD-11), the reliability and clinical utility of ICD diagnostic guidelines for gaming disorder (GD) in the Chinese population have not been studied. The purpose of this field study is to clarify the reliability, clinical utility, and cultural applicability of ICD diagnostic guidelines for GD in China and its comparability with Internet GD (IGD) in the <italic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</italic> (Fifth Edition) (DSM-5).</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> Participants included 21 paired clinical raters consisting of seven psychiatrists and 200 gaming players aged from 15 to 18 years with different risk levels of Internet addiction based on the scores of Young's Internet Addiction Test. Each participant received a semi-structured face-to-face interview by paired clinical raters at the same time. Then clinical raters made the diagnosis and filled the clinical utility questionnaire independently according to the diagnostic guidelines for GD in both ICD-11 and DSM-5.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> The diagnostic consistency coefficient (kappa value) between the paired clinical raters was 0.545 (0.490–0.600, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and 0.622 (0.553–0.691, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) for ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic guidelines, respectively, for GD. The diagnostic consistency was 0.847 (0.814–0.880, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) between GD in ICD-11 and IGD in DSM-5. Meanwhile, 86.7% of responses that agreed with the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for GD provided enough detailed implementation characteristics and showed good overall clinical applicability (86.0%), specificity (94.4%), usefulness (84.1%), and acceptable cultural adaptation (74.8%). GD in ICD-11 was slightly more accepted than IGD in DSM-5 (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), while the clinical efficiency of ICD-11 was inferior to that of DSM-5 (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001).</p><p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> This study indicates that the ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for GD have acceptable clinical reliability and high consistency with IGD in DSM-5. Their clinical applicability and cultural adaption are comparable with those of DSM-5. Although the guidelines still need to be adjusted for better implementation in China, this is already a great step committed to reducing the serious consequences caused by excessive gaming behaviors through effective identification and normative diagnosis, especially for adolescents.</p>