Skip to main content

METHODS article

Front. Psychiatry, 01 March 2023
Sec. Psychopharmacology
This article is part of the Research Topic Down the rabbit hole – the psychological and neural mechanisms of psychedelic compounds and their use in treating mental health and medical conditions View all 14 articles

Psychedelic replications in virtual reality and their potential as a therapeutic instrument: an open-label feasibility study

Updated
  • 1Institute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
  • 2Psychiatry Clinic of North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
  • 3Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

Background: Recent research has shown promising results for the therapeutic benefits of psychedelics. One popular view claims that these benefits are mediated by the subjective experiences induced by these substances. Based on this, we designed a virtual reality experience, Psyrreal, that mimics the phenomenological components of psychedelic experiences.

Aims: We aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of Psyrreal and psychedelic VR experiences in treating depressive symptoms as well as explore the effect of Psyrreal on subjective factors which have been suggested to mediate the therapeutic benefits of psychedelics.

Methods: In this open-label feasibility study, thirteen participants with mild-to-moderate depression underwent a 2-day therapeutic intervention implementing Psyrreal. Depressive symptoms were evaluated by the Emotional State Questionnaire (EST-Q2) at the start of the intervention and 2 weeks after. A thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews after Psyrreal was also conducted as an additional assessment of the method.

Results: A 2-day intervention implementing Psyrreal led to significant decreases in depressive symptoms at the 2-week follow-up (n = 10, p = 0.007, Hedges’ g = 1.046) measured by the Emotional State Questionnaire (EST-Q2). The analysis of semi-structured interviews suggests that Psyrreal could lead to insight and alterations in the sense of self in some people.

Conclusion: This work proposes a novel method using virtual reality to augment the treatment of psychological disorders as well as to precisely investigate the mediating subjective factors of the therapeutic effects of psychedelic substances. Our preliminary results suggest that VR experiences combined with psychological support show potential in treating depressive symptoms and further research into similar methods is warranted.

Introduction

“I had profound and visionary encounters with nature, and this was long before I conducted my initial experiments with LSD [lysergic acid diethylamide]. Indeed, my first experiences with LSD were very reminiscent of these early mystical encounters I had had as a child in nature. So, you see that it is even possible to have these experiences without drugs.” Albert Hoffman, cited in Grob (1).

The last two decades have seen a massive resurgence of research into psychedelics largely due to their wide range of therapeutic benefits [e.g., addiction (25), depression (610), end-of-life distress (1115), suicidality (1618), obsessive-compulsive disorder (19), migraine (20, 21), phantom-limb pain (22), for reviews see (2328)]. This has elevated interest in substance-assisted therapies, where psychedelic sessions are included as a part of the therapeutic process. Preliminary results regarding the efficacy of such methods have been promising (24, 25, 27, 29) and have even shown strong effects in patients whose ailment has not responded to conventional methods (11, 12, 15) [see also (610)]. However, it is currently unclear how psychedelic substances confer these benefits. One possibility is that the underlying mechanisms are strictly neurochemical (30, 31). The alternative proposal is that subjective experiences hold the key to the success of psychedelic interventions (32, 33). According to the latter view, therapeutic success is caused by the subjective experiences elicited by these substances, such as mystical (8, 34, 35), ego-dissolution (32, 3638) or insight experiences (5, 32, 34, 3941). If psychedelic-induced subjective experiences underlie their therapeutic effects, then it should be possible to achieve at least some of the benefits of psychedelic therapy without the substances themselves (42) simply by emulating specific aspects of psychedelic experiences. Furthermore, despite the many benefits of psychedelic therapy, there can also be some disadvantages to administering psychedelic substances (e.g., cost, legality, and contraindication) in certain population groups (4345) which highlights a necessity for finding more accessible alternatives. We propose a way to study this question by mimicking many of the wildly different subjective psychedelic experiences in virtual reality (VR), replicating the audiovisual phenomena reported during psychedelic, mystical and deep meditative experiences.

The potential of virtual reality as a therapeutic device has become an increasingly researched topic. Different VR interventions have been used in the treatment of anxiety with promising results (4649), while depression has only been investigated in a couple of studies (4649). Recent developments in VR technology suggest that it could be possible to induce mystical experiences (50, 51) and imitate parts of the phenomenology of the psychedelic state (52). Also, some recent studies have suggested that using psychedelic phenomenology in VR can lead to similar cognitive (53) and neural (54) effects as seen under psychedelic substances. Thus, these recent works raise the intriguing possibility that perhaps the implementation of such phenomenology in VR could be used to confer similar therapeutic benefits to psychedelic-augmented therapy.

In this work, we have created Psyrreal, a psychedelic-inspired virtual reality experience. While previous studies (50, 52, 55, 56) implementing psychedelic phenomenology in VR used visually relatively simple and unvarying environments, here we have incorporated a much larger set of visual effects and different environments as psychedelic experiences have massive inter-, and intraindividual variance (57, 58). The participant is taken on an immersive journey through many surreal and vastly different virtual environments which aim to convey certain concepts and narratives often reported during psychedelic experiences [e.g., connectedness (59) or ego-dissolution (60)]. Following the example of Carhart-Harris et al. (12), we conducted an open label feasibility study on healthy adults with mild to moderate depressive symptoms to guide further research into similar methods, and investigate the potential therapeutic effects of Psyrreal as well as the specific mechanisms of VR and psychedelic experiences that may confer these benefits. The primary expected outcome of the study was that a VR experience that simulates psychedelic phenomenology could, in combination with an open therapeutic setting, lead to a decrease in depressive symptoms, measured by the Emotional State Questionnaire (61) (EST-Q2). Expected secondary outcomes included increased reported intensity of mystical experiences [measured by the Revised Mystical Experience Questionnaire (29, 62, 63), MEQ30], psychological insight [Psychological Insight Questionnaire (40), PIQ] and ego-dissolution [Ego-Dissolution Inventory (60), EDI].

Materials and methods

Hardware and software

The current version of Psyrreal is a stable release of the virtual reality experience which could already be applied in a therapeutic setting. The experience will run on most modern VR headsets, and HTC Vive Pro Eye was used for development and the experiments. Epic Games Unreal Engine (UE) 4.27 was used as the development platform and the experience was written fully in Blueprint visual scripting language. The final software is distributed as open source upon request1, with the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial license.

Psyrreal imitates the audiovisual and narrative phenomenology reported during psychedelic experiences (57, 58, 6474) (Figure 1). Certain elements were also included based on descriptions of pharmacologically induced and spontaneously occurring mystical experiences (29, 72, 7581), deep meditative states (8285), and awe-inducing experiences (8689) as in some cases these offered more details about specific phenomena which also occur in psychedelic states. The phenomenological elements and concepts used in the experience (Table 1 and Supplementary material 7) were selected after careful study of the available literature on psychedelic (57, 58, 6474), meditative (8285), awe-inducing (8689), and mystical (29, 72, 7581) experiences, written reports (58, 59, 68, 76, 9092) and visual replications (66, 68, 93) of such experiences.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Screenshots of some of the environments in Psyrreal shown in sequence to exemplify the diversity of visuals presented to the user during the experience. The experience starts in a temple (top left), progresses through different levels of varying abstraction and intensity, and culminates in outer space (bottom right). See also Supplementary material 1 for more illustrations of the environments and Table 1 for more detailed descriptions of the implemented concepts. CEV stands for “closed-eye visuals.”

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Overview of elements and concepts common to psychedelic experiences and examples of their implementation in Psyrreal.

The participants begin the experience in a virtual “real world” which starts to acquire psychedelic phenomenology and continues to progress through a total of 19 distinct visual levels incorporating and combining various psychedelic effects. The visuals for the most part consist of abstract shapes and geometric patterns that would allow participants to project their own meaning to the experience. The duration of levels varies from approximately 30 s to 2 min. A specific soundtrack was composed for Psyrreal implementing narrative (e.g., varying intensity) and perceptual (e.g., temporal alterations) aspects of psychedelic phenomenology matching the visual levels. Psyrreal was validated among participants with extensive psychedelic experiences who evaluated its similarity to psychedelic experiences (see Supplementary material 3 for more details). All participants had prior experiences with lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocybin with five (out of seven) participants also having prior experiences with N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) or Ayahuasca. Participants in the validation study were recruited via social media. Five people rated at least one scene from Psyrreal to be visually very similar (4 on a scale from 0 to 5) to psychedelic experiences. Though the experience is purely audiovisual and did not include any physical stimulation, six people also rated the physical sensations induced by Psyrreal to be very similar to those experienced under the effects of psychedelics.

Therapeutic intervention using Psyrreal

Participants

The sample consisted of 13 participants (8 women, 5 men) of ages 20–58 (M = 33.8, SD = 10.6; further information on the participants can be found in the data files, linked under Supplementary material). The study was advertised on an Estonian website that promotes discussion about mental health (peaasi.ee) and recruitment was conducted through self-referral from 20th October 2021 until 8th December 2021. The sample size was determined by practical constraints and concurrent COVID-related restrictions as well as sample sizes of similar feasibility studies [e.g., (12)]. Applicability was decided based on their scores on a self-rated depression screening questionnaire (depressive scale cut-off of ≥12, see below) administered during online registration. The scores of the questionnaire were analyzed and updated with a clinical psychologist on the first day of experiments. Additional criteria for exclusion were: hypersensitivity to motion sickness, a diagnosis of psychotic disorders and schizophrenia, a history of epileptic seizures or psychotic episodes, or a family history of schizophrenia. We also excluded people who were currently undergoing treatment for depression (therapy or medication). Most participants had a previous diagnosis of depression (9 out of 13), but participants who were currently receiving treatment were excluded (see also additional analyses Supplementary material 2). All participants had normal or corrected to normal vision. Participants were asked to refrain from consuming alcohol or other substances before the experience to avoid cybersickness and potential confounding.

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Tartu and performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Participants gave written informed consent prior to participation. All 13 registered people finished the study. One participant (P6) was excluded from the analyses due to receiving antidepressant therapy at the time of the study and another was excluded due to their updated score of depressive symptoms being below the cut-off, thus leaving the final sample at 11 participants. Note that an estimated effect size of 1.11 (based on a relatively similar approach using VR to treat depression) should be detectable with a sample size of 9 [for a statistical power of 0.8, found with G*Power 3.1 (94)].

Measures

The Emotional State Questionnaire (61) (EST-Q2), a standard self-report tool for depression screening in Estonia (95), was used to evaluate differences in symptoms before the experiment and at a 2-week follow-up. A cut-off of ≥12 (threshold commonly used in clinical practice) was applied to only include participants with symptoms indicative of clinical depression. We also evaluated the response (proportion of participants showing decrease of at least 50% of baseline) and remission rate (proportion of participants showing decrease to below 12) based on EST-Q2 scores. The Montgomery−Åsberg Depression Scale (96) (MADRS) was administered by the psychologist before the experiment to validate the depressive symptoms of our sample.

One important facet of subjective experiences that could be instrumental for therapeutic benefits is the insight experience (5, 32, 40, 41). The Psychological Insight Questionnaire (40) (PIQ) was used to capture insights in our sample at the end of the first (control) and second days (Figure 2; same for the other following questionnaires). Another aspect of subjective experience that has been suggested to underlie the beneficial effects of psychedelic therapy is ego dissolution (32, 38, 97), measured here by the Ego-Dissolution Inventory (60) (EDI). Mystical experiences have also been proposed as an important mediating factor for the benefits of psychedelic compounds. Here we used The Revised Mystical Experience Questionnaire (29, 62, 63) (MEQ30) to measure the intensity of mystical experience.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. An illustration of the procedure of the experiment on day 1 and day 2, as well as measurements conducted on the 2 days of experiments and during the follow-up after 2 weeks. The green lines highlight the comparison groups used for the statistical analyses.

MEQ30, PIQ, and EDI were administered at the end of the first day and again at the end of the second day. EST-Q2 was administered during registration and 2 weeks after the experiments. More detailed descriptions of the questionnaires can be found in Supplementary material 5. Baseline scores were also reevaluated during the first discussion with the clinical psychologist at the start of the first day. A semi-structured interview about the experience was also conducted by the clinical psychologist at the end of the second day. An additional background and feedback questionnaire was administered at the end of the second day of experiments, and a feedback form was sent to the participants 2 weeks after the experiments. All questionnaires were administered in Estonian.

Study procedure

This open-label feasibility study used a one-group, uncontrolled, longitudinal design to investigate the effects of psychedelic phenomenology in VR. Experiments were conducted on two consecutive days (Figure 2; see also Supplementary material 6 for more details on the experimental setting). The first day included a diagnostic and preparative 30–45 min session with a clinical psychologist, discussing the depressive symptomology of the participant based on their scores on the EST-Q2 Depression scale (filled in during the online registration) and guiding the participants to frame questions and think about their worries. Afterward, the participants were instructed on how to use the VR equipment and partook in a demonstrative 15 min VR experience, which consisted of a 10 min guided meditation (in a cave-like environment, Supplementary Figure 10; however the participants were instructed to close their eyes for the duration of the meditation) and a further 5 min of being in a non-interactive living-room environment (default Steam VR Home room, Supplementary Figure 9). Participants were seated comfortably during both VR experiences on day 1 and 2. Then the participants had another shorter (5–10 min) discussion with a clinical psychologist and filled in the rest of the questionnaires (EDI, PIQ, and MEQ30). The demonstrative VR experience on the first day also served as a control condition for comparisons with EDI, PIQ, and MEQ30 measures. Participants were instructed to answer the questionnaires based on the 5 min spent in the living-room VR environment. EST-Q2 was not administered after the control VR as it is not a suitable measure for short term changes in mood.

The second day had a similar structure starting with a short discussion with the psychologist to evaluate the effects of the first day and to prepare the participant for the VR experience. During this, the participant was also instructed to look around freely during the experience, sit however they felt comfortable, and not to overly focus on their questions but rather to relax and focus on the experience itself. Then, the participant underwent the same guided meditation in VR as the day before which was directly followed by the 45 min long VR experience. The psychologist was waiting in the next room in case of any psychological emergencies, and a technician was present in the room with the participant to monitor the VR system. After the experience, the participant was allowed to rest for as long as they preferred and then had an integrative session (20–30 min) with the psychologist and answered the questionnaires (EDI, PIQ, and MEQ30). Follow-up EST-Q2 questionnaire was sent to the participants 2 weeks after their participation in the experiment.

The experiments were conducted in the virtual reality laboratory at the Institute of Computer Science of the University of Tartu between 29th October 2021 and 11th December 2021. For more additional details on setting and study procedure see also Supplementary material 6.

Statistical analysis

Paired sample t-tests were conducted on the before and after scores of the questionnaires (EST-Q2, EDI, PIQ, and MEQ30). All tests were two-tailed with α = 0.05. Shapiro–Wilk test confirmed approximately normal distribution for the before-after differences of all datasets. All statistical analyses were conducted with JASP (98) (version 0.16.1.0).

One participant did not fill in the questionnaire at the 2-week follow-up and was therefore excluded from the analyses concerning the EST-Q2 measure. Additionally, two participants implied in their follow-up report that they had sought psychological counseling after the intervention. Because of this, we conducted an additional analysis on all questionnaires, excluding the two participants, yielding similar results which are reported in the Supplementary material 2.

Results

Therapeutic intervention

We conducted an open-label feasibility study in adults (n = 11) with mild to moderate depressive symptoms. Note that n = 10 for the EST-Q2 measure, as one participant did not complete the follow up questionnaire. The experiments took place on two consecutive days with Psyrreal being implemented on the second day (see Figure 2). No adverse effects were reported during the administration of the VR experience, even though the participants were encouraged to express any discomfort. In the interviews afterward, four participants (out of 13) mentioned transient nausea during the VR experience.

Baseline EST-Q2 depression subscale results were M = 15.20 (SD = 2.66) and showed good consistency with the MADRS questionnaire results (r = 0.66, p = 0.010). There was a significant decrease in EST-Q2 scores at the 2 week follow-up (M = 11.00, SD = 3.74; paired samples t-test, t(9) = 3.50, p = 0.007, Hedges’ g = 1.046; Figure 3A). The response rate of the treatment was 18% and remission rate was 60%. The difference between the response and remission rate is largely due to the mild-to-moderate symptoms reported by the studied population. The anxiety scale results of the EST-Q2 showed a similar pattern, as scores decreased from baseline M = 10.10 (SD = 4.65) to M = 7.60 (SD = 4.14) after 2 weeks [t(9) = 3.73, p = 0.005, g = 0.459; Figure 3B].

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. A raincloud plot of the EST-Q2 depression scale (A) and anxiety scale (B) scores as measured before the experiment and 2 weeks after. Depicted are individual scores, as well as boxplots and density distributions of the results (N = 10).

PIQ score results were M = 24.74 (SD = 22.98) after the control condition and M = 29.09 (SD = 21.73) after the experimental condition. Paired samples t-test indicated that the change was not statistically significant [t(10) = 1.256, p = 0.238, g = 0.161].

EDI scores increased from M = 35.76 (SD = 21.14) after the control condition to M = 39.83 (SD = 27.77) post-experiment, but the change was not statistically significant [t(10) = 0.829, p = 0.426, g = 0.136]. Two participants (P2, P3) did show a large increase (>25 points) in EDI scores.

The MEQ30 average score increased from M = 39.58 (SD = 19.57) to 42.73 (σ = 18.43). The change was not statistically significant [t(10) = 0.673, p = 0.520, g = 0.137]. One participant (P3) reported a complete mystical experience (all MEQ30 subscales over 60) on day two. One participant (P7) reported a complete mystical experience on the first day, but not on the second.

While the changes of scores on PIQ, MEQ30 and EDI did not reach statistical significance, the results were highly varied. A thematic analysis (99) was conducted based on the transcripts of the integrative semi-structured interview sessions to investigate the effects of the intervention on individual participants. Extracts from the transcripts that were used in the thematic analysis can be found in Supplementary material 4. The analysis revealed certain themes that were often mentioned in the interviews (Table 2). All participants reported feeling some positive emotions during the experience with 55% of participants reporting calmness or peace and the same amount of people reporting feelings of joy, pleasure, or fun. Seven participants also reported negative emotions (sadness, fear, and anxiety) with four participants mentioning feeling sadness. A total of 45% of participants reported that they had personally relevant thoughts during the experience, for example, one participant mentioned: “From this place where I got in touch with this emotion [sadness] these other questions also started to unravel and I understood many of my [behavioural and cognitive] patterns,” (P12). Six participants mentioned that they did not reach any new understandings, while three did arrive at new beneficial understandings: “[.] this novel understanding that I can reprogram myself, that this essence of myself doesn’t exist—it’s very liberating. It gives me, in some sense, a vitality that I’m looking for,” (P7).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Common themes found in the analysis of the semi-structured interviews (n = 11). The colored bar plot indicates the proportion of participants who mentioned that theme in their interviews.

Three participants specifically highlighted a physical feeling of insight as illustrated by the following quote from participant seven: “It was a different kind of insight, like a new insight. Like a physical insight,” (P7). Five people reported changes in perspective: “[.] Like a shift in perspective - in the beginning, I was looking more at the details, afterward I was looking at the whole,” (P3). Six participants reported alterations in their sense of self with three reporting alterations in the narrative sense of self and four participants reporting alterations in the embodied sense of self. For example: “Did you experience any change or loss of your self-image or sense of self? Yes, like dissolution, yes. [.] The whole experience was so immersive that you melted into it,” (P2). A total of 36% of participants reported somatic effects during the experience: “Specifically the parts with strong motion, these almost physical experiences, those were the most impactful,” (P12).

Discussion

We created a novel VR experience based on psychedelic and mystical experiences as well as meditative states and implemented it in a therapeutic intervention for people with mild-to-moderate depression.

The results of the study suggest that using VR experiences in a therapeutic setting could be beneficial in treating depressive symptoms, with participants showing a significant reduction in depressive symptoms 2 weeks after the experiments. As this was an open-label feasibility study with a relatively small number of participants, strong conclusions about the efficacy of such interventions cannot be made. Nevertheless, as 73% of participants showed a decrease in their depressive symptoms 2 weeks after a short 2-day intervention at a 60% remission rate, further research into such methods is warranted. Additionally, a previous study using a VR experience to treat depression also reported a comparable effect (49), offering preliminary tenability for the potential therapeutic benefits of VR experiences. Anxiety scores also decreased significantly at the follow-up. However, the anxiety scores were generally low beforehand with four participants having a score indicative of an anxiety disorder (≥12). That being said, these results suggest using psychedelic-inspired virtual reality for the treatment of anxiety to also be a promising avenue for research. Additionally, results from the thematic analysis suggest that a psychedelic VR experience, when accompanied by a dedicated therapeutic setting, might be able to induce insight and understanding at least for some people. Three participants reported gaining new and beneficial insights related to their problems and two more mentioned gaining new perspectives during the experience. However, across sample the change in insightfulness rating as measured by PIQ did not reach significance, indicating great interindividual variance.

Overall, these results add some tentative support to the hypothesis that subjective experiences mediate the benefits of psychedelics. Psyrreal incorporates a wide range of elements common to psychedelic experiences such as specific audiovisual phenomenology (e.g., visual acuity enhancement and CEVs; see Table 1), different structural elements of these experiences [e.g., overwhelming and oscillating intensity, and progression of the experience (100)], and general experiential themes (e.g., mystical and ego-dissolution experiences; see Table 1). The effects of our intervention on depressive symptoms were similar (albeit weaker) to those seen in psychedelic-assisted therapy (101). While the questionnaires implemented to evaluate the subjective factors which have been found to mediate the therapeutic benefits of psychedelics did not show statistically significant changes, the results of these questionnaires were highly varied in our small sample and prevent us from making strong conclusions. However, the results of the thematic analysis suggest that implementing surreal awe-inducing environments, and intense and variable experiences in VR could facilitate insights or alterations in sense of self at least for some people. Future studies are required to confirm these speculations and evaluate the mediating factors with a larger sample and a randomized placebo-controlled trial design.

Previous similar studies using VR (50, 51) have found slightly higher results on the MEQ30 questionnaire. Specifically, the scores of the Mystical and Positive Mood subscales were higher for Isness-C (for Isness-D only the Positive Mood subscale was significantly higher) (51). However, these studies also implemented a guiding narration by a “trained drama therapist” which emphasized elements of mystical experiences (50) potentially enhancing the perception of the experience as mystical. While the current version of Psyrreal did not include narration, adding it in the future could further enhance the effect of Psyrreal. The differences on the Positive Mood subscale are likely to be influenced by the symptoms of depression prevalent in our sample and the “amplifying” effect of the experience which allowed some participants to get in touch with their negative emotions.

Possible mechanisms of psychedelic-inspired-VR-augmented therapy

Our augmented therapy intervention combined a therapeutic environment and discussion about one’s problems with an engaging VR experience. One potential mechanism how this intervention yields therapeutic benefits could be that the intense and different virtual experience amplifies the therapeutic process and provides an experiential route for the participant to get in touch with their emotions (102106) as an alternative to cognitive therapies which emphasize the role of explicit verbal discussion and reasoning (107109). According to current understandings of psychedelic therapy, psychedelic substances in contrast to conventional antidepressants serve to amplify mental content and thus help to address rather than avoid aversive memories and emotions (23, 59, 110). Some participants mentioned that they were able to access feelings that have otherwise stayed out of reach, for example one participant expressed to the psychologist: “When we met yesterday, [.] I said I could not feel sadness. We could have five more similar sessions and I still wouldn’t feel sadness. But thanks to this experience, as short as it was yesterday, suddenly this sadness arose (in me),” (P7).

A related possible mechanism is that the intensity of the experience can require relinquishing control which could result in some degree of relaxation of fixed cognitive constraints. The relaxation of top-down beliefs is suggested to be one of the possible mechanisms behind the therapeutic effects of psychedelics, wherein potentially pathological content can be accessed and overwritten (111). Letting go of control and allowing oneself to experience anything that comes up in a psychedelic experience could allow more difficult content to reach consciousness, shorten the challenging episodes and foster integration and healthy interpretation of difficult content (112, 113). This concept of “letting go” is a central element of psychedelic (59, 113, 114) and other forms of therapy (115, 116), ritual use of psychedelics (117) as well as an important part of meditative practices (84, 118120) [see also (41)]. Psyrreal mimics the oscillating and overwhelming intensity of psychedelic experiences (68). For example, some sections of Psyrreal purposefully depict high-motion visual scenes without actual physical motion that induce quite strong physical sensations and mild symptoms of cybersickness that can be “let go” (e.g., Figure 1 “Tunnel”). Hence, this somatoaudiovisual intensity could also function as something that could be accepted or surrendered to. The beneficial effects of “letting go” were also remarked by some participants, for example: “[.] Then, at one moment, I let go, thinking that it doesn’t work like this [focusing on finding answers]. [.] Then it actually started to work, yes. [.] I think that the first half of the experience you kind of get into it or start going along with it and then the answers arrive very clearly somehow,” (P12). In our study, participants were explicitly instructed to accept and let go of any emotions that might arise during the experience. While Psyrreal does not include any explicitly affective visual stimuli (the music, however, varies in its emotional tone) most participants mentioned experiencing a wide range of emotions with some explicitly reporting “getting in touch” with their emotions (see above). Therefore, we suggest that another potential therapeutic mechanism for this type of therapy could be combining a virtual emotion-eliciting experience with the preparation of “letting go.” Somewhat similar ideas have been implemented in VR-augmented exposure therapy where people are exposed to aversive virtual stimuli to facilitate habituation, inhibition or cognitive reappraisal of the psychological reaction (121123).

While the experience of being in virtual reality in itself might facilitate elements that could beneficially augment the therapeutic process, there could also be added value in implementing specific visual content from reports of subjective psychedelic and mystical experiences. Unusual, infinitely vast, and even surreal stimuli common to such experiences might result in emotions of surprise and awe, where the novel stimulus needs to be accommodated into existing cognitive structures (86). The necessity for accommodating vastly different and novel stimuli would require updating the existing mental framework (86, 124) and thereby lead to a state of plasticity or “insightfulness” (41). This could allow the subject to gain different perspectives, revise pathological beliefs, and come to new insights (105, 124, 125). Such effects have also been discussed in contemporary psychedelic science (111). In fact, awe has been suggested to be a central mediator of the beneficial effects of psychedelics (126) and a potential therapeutic asset for different mental health disorders, including depression (127). Psyrreal contains infinite abstract “worlds” as well as vast landscapes and cathedrals which could induce awe (87). Additionally, virtual environments which break the usual laws of physics might also require accommodation and induce states of relaxed beliefs (105, 128, 129).

Limitations

Despite our efforts, we are far from claiming that Psyrreal is an exact replication of psychedelic experiences. Psychedelic experiences encompass many aspects of consciousness (32, 57, 58) that we tried to replicate within the audiovisually confined medium of virtual reality. Some elements of substance-induced psychedelic experiences are inherently impossible to be implemented in virtual reality (e.g., hyperdimensional spaces, many synesthetic elements). Also, compared to psychedelics, virtual reality has some additional aspects which could contribute to the loss of immersion in the experience. For example, people might lose their immersion due to interactive elements that fail to meet their expectations or due to the graphics not being realistic enough (130).

The open-label design, small sample size and lack of controls in our reported experiment do not allow us to make strong claims about such interventions yet. We were unable to reliably estimate the effect of the control condition on EST-Q2 scores due to the 2-day design, as such short term changes (or lack thereof) would be unlikely to reflect true effects. Hence, the main comparison in depression scores could only be evaluated at least 2 weeks after the intervention. The design was chosen after careful consideration of how to best optimize resources for the purpose of evaluating preliminary results and feasibility for conducting more expensive future studies – which we now hope to conduct. Therefore, it is also possible that an expectancy bias in the participants, initial discussion with the psychologist, guided meditation or even a brief experience of non-psychedelic virtual reality might be responsible for the decrease of depressive symptoms. This is highlighted by a few participants reporting quite high results on the Psychological Insight Questionnaire and Mystical Experience Questionnaire even on the first day. While the psychologist did not apply usual therapeutic techniques and assumed the role of an observer, simply an opportunity to discuss their problems could already have had a beneficial effect.

While MEQ30 has been validated for psychedelic compounds and it has seen some use in investigating non-pharmacological methods for inducing mystical experiences [e.g., (50, 51, 131134)], we are not aware of any studies using non-pharmacological methods that have implemented a control/baseline measurement of MEQ30. Our results suggest some potential difficulties in using the MEQ30 with non-pharmacological methods, as multiple participants had confusing results with one participant reporting a complete mystical experience on day one and a further two participants who only very narrowly missed out on the threshold of a complete mystical experience. While it is not impossible that they actually had a real mystical experience on the first day, it is unlikely and they also did not describe their experience as such during their discussion with the psychologist. We speculate that certain inflated scores could be due to the subjective nature of the questionnaire, and/or difficulties in understanding the questions. As the MEQ30 instructions require people to compare a specific experience (in our case, the VR experience) to other previous experiences in their lives, the results are dependent on the intensity of similar experiences they have had in the past, as well as their previous experience with VR. This also relates to difficulties in understanding the questions: people with varying amounts of mystical experiences can have a very different understanding of the questionnaire items which is further exacerbated by the fact that mystical experiences are ineffable and hard to describe (35, 81). It is also possible that a VR experience by itself could incline some participants to report high scores on the MEQ30. Finally, it is possible that the participants scored higher due to not wanting to disappoint the experimenters, as the people conducting the experiment were friendly and supportive to create an environment where participants feel safe and comfortable. Though, due to the open-label design, participants were aware that the measurements on the first day served an introductory and demonstrative purpose.

The guided meditation and short demonstrative VR (used on the first day) could also be conducive to reporting high scores on the MEQ30, PIQ, and EDI. Additionally, the results of these questionnaires were compared between a 5 min long control VR and 45 min long Psyrreal, which limits the comparability of the conditions. The effects of meditation on inducing altered states of consciousness, insight, self-alterations and mystical experiences are well documented (8284, 132), but even a short experience with VR could have some effect for a couple of reasons. First, for people who have not had much experience with VR, the experience might be something so different that it has a strong effect on them (135). Second, the content of VR might by chance be specifically relevant to the participant, as was the case for one participant (who was excluded from the analysis) who had been pondering whether they should go traveling to the mountains with their ex-spouse. As the demonstrative VR was in a small room with a balcony view onto a mountain range the participant felt it to be very personally meaningful. Third, one of the potential mediators of the beneficial effects of psychedelic experiences as well as a crucial element of mystical experiences (32, 38, 97) — ego-dissolution, might be induced to some degree in any VR experience with an altered image of the body (136, 137). While the EDI did not show a significant change from baseline, half of the participants showed relatively high (a score of over 40) results even after the demo experience on the first day and several participants mentioned alterations in their sense of self during the integrative sessions. Therefore, it can be difficult to disentangle the effects of VR and the specific psychedelic content of our designed experience. Also, blinding procedures for such methods are complicated by a bane common to psychedelic investigation — the active condition is easily distinguishable from the control condition (44, 138, 139). The issues of blinding and confounding are important to be addressed in future studies.

Advantages of virtual reality for studying psychedelic therapy

Although virtual reality is likely a less powerful tool than psychedelic substances (52) [but see (50)], using it to augment therapy could be beneficial for those who suffer from acute side effects of psychedelics or who prefer to avoid consuming these kinds of substances. Virtual reality could also work as a stepping stone before engaging in psychedelic therapy (101) and could be used in countries where psychedelics are not available for medical use. The duration of virtual reality experiences is also less constrained than psychedelic experiences, which (in the case of LSD) can last over 16 h (140). Virtual reality experiences can be stopped at any moment (e.g., in the case of challenging experiences) or paused if the participant would like to immediately discuss something. Virtual reality could also be a powerful tool for investigating the precise therapeutic factors of subjective (e.g., psychedelic) experiences (101) which are often confounded and contain multiple interfering interactions, as it allows to test and separate different elements and concepts that might mediate beneficial effects. In other words, virtual reality allows one to study in a controlled manner which specific subjective experiences (e.g., certain visual experiences, challenging experiences, ego-dissolution) might be beneficial for therapeutic success.

Forms of meditation, audiovisual media, engaging in physical activities (e.g., dancing and hiking) could also be used as therapeutic “amplifiers” (105), but virtual reality offers an especially powerful medium for such a tool. First, it can offer a strong sense of presence and immersion in a specific environment which might be beneficial for the efficacy of such augmentation (101). Second, virtual reality is adaptable and could be tailored to the needs and specific symptomatology of the participant as well as to different disorders (e.g., anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder). For instance, in Psyrreal it is possible to remove and add specific parts of the experience to customize the virtual reality experience for the specific participant and the circumstances. Third, virtual reality could have some advantages in regard to inducing ego-dissolution (51, 105, 136, 141, 142) which could be one of the mechanisms behind the therapeutic effects of psychedelics (32, 38, 97). Fourth, virtual reality assisted therapeutic interventions have high satisfaction rates (143) and are often preferred by patients. This was also echoed by our participants who subjectively evaluated the potential effectiveness of such an intervention with a mean rating of 8.00 out of 10 (n = 12, SD = 2.30).

Future developments

The current study highlights multiple important directions for further research. First, some participants in our study mentioned that the computer graphics and lack of interactivity led to a loss of immersion in the experience. Next iterations of Psyrreal might benefit from adding a guided narration to make certain implemented concepts (e.g., connectedness or ego-dissolution) clearer, and from incorporating more interactive elements which could be beneficial for increasing immersion in the experience (144). Technical developments in the growing field of virtual reality are likely to hugely enhance designing such therapeutic experiences and could be used to develop more immersive and ‘realistic’ experiences in the near future. Second, while Psyrreal implements a wide variety of different phenomenological aspects, it could also be interesting to investigate specific components separately to help elucidate the therapeutically beneficial factors of psychedelic experiences. Furthermore, implementing an appropriate control condition is a difficult task for VR methods which could be addressed in future research (i.e., developing suitable “placebo” VR experiences). Third, combining virtual or augmented reality with, for example, sensory deprivation methods or microdosing of psychedelics might also offer intriguing avenues of research (101, 145, 146). Fourth, the results of MEQ30 and EDI highlight some issues in using these questionnaires for VR experiences (see “Limitations”). The development of new questionnaires or adaptation of existing ones for VR could be useful to investigate the effects of similar VR-based methods more reliably.

Conclusion

We developed Psyrreal, a somatoaudiovisual virtual reality experience based on psychedelic and mystical phenomenology to aid the treatment of different psychological disorders and help participants to see things from new perspectives. We observed that using this novel therapeutic tool in an augmented therapy intervention alleviates mild-to-moderate depressive symptoms. The results of the study suggest that psychedelic subjective experiences implemented through virtual reality could have therapeutically beneficial effects (potentially extending beyond depression) and that further research into similar novel tools is warranted. Implementing elements of psychedelic experiences that potentially mediate therapeutic effects in virtual reality can also help to precisely investigate and elucidate the mechanisms underlying psychedelic therapy.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of the University of Tartu. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

KK, MV, and JA designed the software. KK, MV, JP, and KT conducted the experiments. JA conceived the idea. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript, designing the experiments, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was supported by the European Social Fund through the IT Academy Programme and the Estonian Research Council grant PSG728.

Acknowledgments

We thank Aurora Ruus and Iris Tähema for composing the excellent musical score implemented in Psyrreal, Mari Munk for psychological counseling during the intervention, Anni Kuusik and Kristiina Männik for help with the guided meditation, all the participants (including those involved in the pilot studies) for their feedback. We also thank Alar Tamming, Mait Kraun, and Villem Nilbe for invaluable discussion, and Mary-Ann Kubre and Eiko Fried for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1088896/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

  1. ^ Can be requested at the website https://psyrreal.mozellosite.com.

References

1. Grob CS. A conversation with Albert Hofmann. Newsl Multidiscip Assoc Psychedel Stud Maps. (1998) 8:30–3.

Google Scholar

2. Bogenschutz MP, Forcehimes A, Pommy J, Wilcox C, Barbosa P, Strassman R. Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: a proof-of-concept study. J Psychopharmacol. (2015) 29:289–99. doi: 10.1177/0269881114565144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Garcia-Romeu A, Griffiths RR, Johnson MW. Psilocybin-occasioned mystical experiences in the treatment of tobacco addiction. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. (2014) 7:157–64. doi: 10.2174/1874473708666150107121331

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Garcia-Romeu A, Davis A, Erowid F, Erowid E, Griffiths R, Johnson M. Cessation and reduction in alcohol consumption and misuse after psychedelic use. J Psychopharmacol. (2019) 33:1088–101. doi: 10.1177/0269881119845793

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Garcia-Romeu A, Davis A, Erowid E, Erowid F, Griffiths R, Johnson M. Persisting reductions in cannabis, opioid, and stimulant misuse after naturalistic psychedelic use: an online survey. Front Psychiatry. (2020) 10:955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00955

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Gasser P, Kirchner K, Passie T. LSD-assisted psychotherapy for anxiety associated with a life-threatening disease: a qualitative study of acute and sustained subjective effects. J Psychopharmacol. (2015) 29:57–68. doi: 10.1177/0269881114555249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ross S, Bossis A, Guss J, Agin-Liebes G, Malone T, Cohen B, et al. Rapid and sustained symptom reduction following psilocybin treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychopharmacol. (2016) 30:1165–80. doi: 10.1177/0269881116675512

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Griffiths RR, Johnson M, Carducci M, Umbricht A, Richards W, Richards B, et al. Psilocybin produces substantial and sustained decreases in depression and anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancer: a randomized double-blind trial. J Psychopharmacol. (2016) 30:1181–97. doi: 10.1177/0269881116675513

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Grob CS, Danforth A, Chopra G, Hagerty M, McKay C, Halberstadt A, et al. Pilot study of psilocybin treatment for anxiety in patients with advanced-stage cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2011) 68:71–8. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.116

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Grob CS, Bossis AP, Griffiths RR. Use of the classic hallucinogen psilocybin for treatment of existential distress associated with cancer. In: Steel JL, Carr BI editors. Psychological aspects of cancer: a guide to emotional and psychological consequences of cancer, their causes and their management. Berlin: Springer (2013). p. 69–89. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4866-2_17

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Carhart-Harris RL, Bolstridge M, Day C, Rucker J, Watts R, Erritzoe D, et al. Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: six-month follow-up. Psychopharmacology. (2018) 235:399–408. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4771-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Carhart-Harris RL, Bolstridge M, Rucker J, Day C, Erritzoe D, Kaelen M, et al. Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study. Lancet Psychiatry. (2016) 3:619–27. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30065-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Osório FL, Sanches R, Macedo L, Santos R, Maia-de-Oliveira J, Wichert-Ana L, et al. Antidepressant effects of a single dose of ayahuasca in patients with recurrent depression: a preliminary report. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. (2015) 37:13–20. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2014-1496

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Sanches RF, de Lima Osório F, Dos Santos R, Macedo L, Maia-de-Oliveira J, Wichert-Ana L. Antidepressant effects of a single dose of ayahuasca in patients with recurrent depression: a SPECT study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. (2016) 36:77–81. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000436

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Palhano-Fontes F, Barreto D, Onias H, Andrade K, Novaes M, Pessoa J, et al. Rapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Psychol Med. (2019) 49:655–63. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001356

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Zeifman RJ, Singhal N, Dos Santos R, Sanches R, de Lima Osório F, Hallak J, et al. Rapid and sustained decreases in suicidality following a single dose of ayahuasca among individuals with recurrent major depressive disorder: results from an open-label trial. Psychopharmacology. (2021) 238:453–9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05692-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Zeifman RJ, Singhal N, Breslow L, Weissman CR. On the relationship between classic psychedelics and suicidality: a systematic review. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. (2021) 4:436–51. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.1c00024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Hendricks PS, Johnson MW, Griffiths RR. Psilocybin, psychological distress, and suicidality. J Psychopharmacol. (2015) 29:1041–3.

Google Scholar

19. Moreno FA, Wiegand CB, Taitano EK, Delgado PL. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of psilocybin in 9 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. (2006) 67:1735–40. doi: 10.4088/JCP.v67n1110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Schindler EAD, Sewell R, Gottschalk C, Luddy C, Flynn L, Lindsey H, et al. Exploratory controlled study of the migraine-suppressing effects of psilocybin. Neurotherapeutics. (2021) 18:534–43. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00962-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Andersson M, Persson M, Kjellgren A. Psychoactive substances as a last resort-a qualitative study of self-treatment of migraine and cluster headaches. Harm Reduct J. (2017) 14:60. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0186-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Ramachandran V, Chunharas C, Marcus Z, Furnish T, Lin A. Relief from intractable phantom pain by combining psilocybin and mirror visual-feedback (MVF). Neurocase. (2018) 24:105–10. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2018.1468469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Carhart-Harris RL, Goodwin GM. The therapeutic potential of psychedelic drugs: past, present, and future. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2017) 42:2105–13. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.84

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Muttoni S, Ardissino M, John C. Classical psychedelics for the treatment of depression and anxiety: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. (2019) 258:11–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Andersen KAA, Carhart-Harris R, Nutt DJ, Erritzoe D. Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: a systematic review of modern-era clinical studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (2021) 143:101–18. doi: 10.1111/acps.13249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Castro Santos H, Gama Marques J. What is the clinical evidence on psilocybin for the treatment of psychiatric disorders? A systematic review. Porto Biomed J. (2021) 6:e128.

Google Scholar

27. Nichols DE. Psychedelics. Pharmacol Rev. (2016) 68:264–355. doi: 10.1124/pr.115.011478

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Johnson MW, Hendricks PS, Barrett FS, Griffiths RR. Classic psychedelics: an integrative review of epidemiology, therapeutics, mystical experience, and brain network function. Pharmacol Ther. (2019) 197:83–102. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.11.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Griffiths RR, Richards WA, McCann U, Jesse R. Psilocybin can occasion mystical-type experiences having substantial and sustained personal meaning and spiritual significance. Psychopharmacology. (2006) 187:268–83. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0457-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Olson DE. The subjective effects of psychedelics may not be necessary for their enduring therapeutic effects. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. (2021) 4:563–7. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.0c00192

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Peters J, Olson DE. Engineering safer psychedelics for treating addiction. Neurosci Insights. (2021) 16:26331055211033847. doi: 10.1177/26331055211033847

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Letheby C. Philosophy of Psychedelics. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2021). doi: 10.1093/med/9780198843122.001.0001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Yaden DB, Griffiths RR. The subjective effects of psychedelics are necessary for their enduring therapeutic effects. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. (2021) 4:568–72. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.0c00194

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Bogenschutz MP, Pommy JM. Therapeutic mechanisms of classic hallucinogens in the treatment of addictions: from indirect evidence to testable hypotheses. Drug Test Anal. (2012) 4:543–55. doi: 10.1002/dta.1376

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Barrett FS, Griffiths RR. Classic hallucinogens and mystical experiences: phenomenology and neural correlates. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. (2018) 36:393–430. doi: 10.1007/7854_2017_474

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Carhart-Harris RL, Leech R, Hellyer P, Shanahan M, Feilding A, Tagliazucchi E, et al. The entropic brain: a theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs. Front Hum Neurosci. (2014) 8:20. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Ciaunica A, Safron A. Disintegrating and reintegrating the self-(In)flexible self-models in depersonalisation and psychedelic experiences. PsyArXiv. [Preprint]. (2022). doi: 10.31234/osf.io/mah78

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Stoliker D, Egan GF, Razi A. Reduced precision underwrites ego dissolution and therapeutic outcomes under psychedelics. Front Neurosci. (2022) 16:827400. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.827400

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Carhart-Harris RL. The entropic brain - revisited. Neuropharmacology. (2018) 142:167–78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.03.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Davis AK, Barrett F, So S, Gukasyan N, Swift T, Griffiths R. Development of the psychological insight questionnaire among a sample of people who have consumed psilocybin or LSD. J Psychopharmacol. (2021) 35:437–46. doi: 10.1177/0269881120967878

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Tulver K, Kaup KK, Laukkonen R, Aru J. Restructuring insight: an integrative review of insight in problem-solving, meditation, psychotherapy, delusions and psychedelics. PsyArXiv. [Preprint]. (2021). doi: 10.31234/osf.io/8fbt9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Brouwer A, Carhart-Harris RL. Pivotal mental states. J Psychopharmacol. (2021) 35:319–52. doi: 10.1177/0269881120959637

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Aday JS, Davis AK, Mitzkovitz CM, Bloesch EK, Davoli CC. Predicting reactions to psychedelic drugs: a systematic review of states and traits related to acute drug effects. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. (2021) 4:424–35. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.1c00014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Rucker JJH, Iliff J, Nutt DJ. Psychiatry & the psychedelic drugs. Past, present & future. Neuropharmacology. (2018) 142:200–18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.12.040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Schlag AK, Aday J, Salam I, Neill JC, Nutt DJ. Adverse effects of psychedelics: from anecdotes and misinformation to systematic science. J Psychopharmacol. (2022) 36:258–72. doi: 10.1177/02698811211069100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Baghaei N, Chitale V, Hlasnik A, Stemmet L, Liang H, Porter R. Virtual reality for supporting the treatment of depression and anxiety: scoping review. JMIR Ment Health. (2021) 8:e29681. doi: 10.2196/29681

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Freeman D, Reeve S, Robinson A, Ehlers A, Clark D, Spanlang B, et al. Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychol Med. (2017) 47:2393–400. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700040X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Li J, Theng YL, Foo S. Game-based digital interventions for depression therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. (2014) 17:519–27. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0481

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Falconer CJ, Rovira A, King J, Gilbert P, Antley A, Fearon P, et al. Embodying self-compassion within virtual reality and its effects on patients with depression. BJPsych Open. (2016) 2:74–80. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Glowacki DR, Wonnacott M, Freire R, Glowacki B, Gale E, Pike J, et al. Isness: using multi-person VR to design peak mystical type experiences comparable to psychedelics. Conference on human factors in computing systems - proceedings. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (2020). p. 1–14. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376649

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Glowacki, DR, Williams RR, Maynard OM, Pike JE, Freire R, Wonnacott MD, et al. Dissolving yourself in connection to others: shared experiences of ego attenuation and connectedness during group VR experiences can be comparable to psychedelics. arXiv. [Preprint]. (2021). Available online at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.07796 (accessed on June 21, 2021).

Google Scholar

52. Suzuki K, Roseboom W, Schwartzman DJ, Seth AK. A deep-dream virtual reality platform for studying altered perceptual phenomenology. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:15982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16316-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Rastelli C, Greco A, Kenett YN, Finocchiaro C, De Pisapia N. Simulated visual hallucinations in virtual reality enhance cognitive flexibility. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:4027. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08047-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Greco A, Gallitto G, D’alessandro M, Rastelli C. Increased entropic brain dynamics during deepdream-induced altered perceptual phenomenology. Entropy. (2021) 23:839. doi: 10.3390/e23070839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Denzer S, Diezig S, Achermann P, Koenig T, Mast FW. BizarreVR: dream-like bizarreness in immersive virtual reality induced changes in conscious experience of reality while leaving spatial presence intact. Conscious Cogn. (2022) 99:103283. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103283

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Drori G, Bar-Tal P, Stern Y, Zvilichovsky Y, Salomon R. Unreal? Investigating the sense of reality and psychotic symptoms with virtual reality. J Clin Med. (2020) 9:1627. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061627

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Preller KH, Vollenweider FX. Phenomenology, structure, and dynamic of psychedelic states. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. (2018) 36:221–56. doi: 10.1007/7854_2016_459

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Masters REL, Houston J. The varietes of psychedelic experience. New York, NY: Dell Publishing (1966).

Google Scholar

59. Watts R, Day C, Krzanowski J, Nutt D, Carhart-Harris R. Patients’ accounts of increased “connectedness” and “acceptance” after psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. J Humanist Psychol. (2017) 57:520–64. doi: 10.1177/0022167817709585

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Nour MM, Evans L, Nutt D, Carhart-Harris RL. Ego-dissolution and psychedelics: validation of the ego-dissolution inventory (EDI). Front Hum Neurosci. (2016) 10:269. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00269

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Aluoja A, Shlik J, Vasar V, Luuk K, Leinsalu M. Development and psychometric properties of the emotional state questionnaire, a self-report questionnaire for depression and anxiety. Nord J Psychiatry. (1999) 53:443–9. doi: 10.1080/080394899427692

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. MacLean KA, Leoutsakos JMS, Johnson MW, Griffiths RR. Factor analysis of the mystical experience questionnaire: a study of experiences occasioned by the hallucinogen psilocybin. J Sci Study Relig. (2012) 51:721–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01685.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Landes H. Õnnelikkuse seosed religioossuse ja müstilise kogemusega Eesti valimil. Tartu: University of Tartu (2020).

Google Scholar

64. Studerus E, Gamma A, Vollenweider FX. Psychometric evaluation of the altered states of consciousness rating scale (OAV). PLoS One. (2010) 5:e12412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012412

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Klüver H. Mechanisms of hallucinations. In: Terman, Merrill editors. Studies in personality. New York, N.Y: Mc-Graw-Hill (1942). p. 175–207.

Google Scholar

66. Siegel RK. Hallucinations. Sci Am. (1977) 237:132–40.

Google Scholar

67. Abraham HD. Visual phenomenology of the LSD flashback. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (1983) 40:884–9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790070074009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Kins, J. Subjective Effect Index. (n.d.). Available online at: https://effectindex.com/ (accessed on May 10, 2022).

Google Scholar

69. Kometer M, Vollenweider FX. Serotonergic hallucinogen-induced visual perceptual alterations. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. (2018) 36:257–82. doi: 10.1007/7854_2016_461

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Kraehenmann R, Pokorny D, Vollenweider L, Preller K, Pokorny T, Seifritz E, et al. Dreamlike effects of LSD on waking imagery in humans depend on serotonin 2A receptor activation. Psychopharmacology. (2017) 234:2031–46. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4610-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Kraehenmann R, Pokorny D, Aicher H, Preller K, Pokorny T, Bosch O, et al. LSD increases primary process thinking via serotonin 2A receptor activation. Front Pharmacol. (2017) 8:814. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00814

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Richards WA. Sacred knowledge: psychedelics and religious experiences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press (2016).

Google Scholar

73. Sanz C, Tagliazucchi E. The experience elicited by hallucinogens presents the highest similarity to dreaming within a large database of psychoactive substance reports. Front Neurosci. (2018) 12:7. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Strassman R. DMT: the spirit molecule. Rochester, VT: Park Street Press (2001).

Google Scholar

75. Corneille JS, Luke D. Spontaneous spiritual awakenings: phenomenology, altered states, individual differences, and well-being. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:720579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720579

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Garcia-Romeu A, Himelstein SP, Kaminker J. Self-transcendent experience: a grounded theory study. Qual Res. (2015) 15:633–54. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12583

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Griffiths RR, Richards WA, Johnson MW, McCann UD, Jesse R. Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. J Psychopharmacol. (2008) 22:621–32. doi: 10.1177/0269881108094300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Griffiths RR, Hurwitz ES, Davis AK, Johnson MW, Jesse R. Survey of subjective ‘God encounter experiences’: comparisons among naturally occurring experiences and those occasioned by the classic psychedelics psilocybin, LSD, ayahuasca, or DMT. PLoS One. (2019) 14:e0214377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214377

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Pahnke WM. Drugs & mysticism: an analysis of the relationship between psychedelic drugs and mystical consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University (1963).

Google Scholar

80. Stace WT. Mysticism and philosophy. London: Macmillan Publishers (1960).

Google Scholar

81. James W. The varieties of religious experience: a study in human nature: being the Gifford lectures on natural religion delivered at Edinburgh in 1901-1902. New York, NY: Random House (1902).

Google Scholar

82. Gamma A, Metzinger T. The minimal phenomenal experience questionnaire (MPE-92M): towards a phenomenological profile of ‘pure awareness’ experiences in meditators. PLoS One. (2021) 16:e0253694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253694

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Gifford-May D, Thompson NL. ‘Deep states’ of meditation: phenomenological reports of experience. J Transpers Psychol. (1994) 26:117–38. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Yates J, Immergut M, Graves J. The mind illuminated: a complete meditation guide integrating buddhist wisdom and brain science. DharmChicago, IL: Treasure Press (2015).

Google Scholar

85. Grabovac A. The stages of insight: clinical relevance for mindfulness-based interventions. Mindfulness. (2015) 6:589–600. doi: 10.1007/s12671-014-0294-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Keltner D, Haidt J. Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cogn Emot. (2003) 17:297–314. doi: 10.1080/02699930302297

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Chirico A, Ferrise F, Cordella L, Gaggioli A. Designing awe in virtual reality: an experimental study. Front Psychol. (2018) 8:2351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02351

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Stepanova ER, Quesnel D, Riecke BE. Understanding AWE: can a virtual journey, inspired by the overview effect, lead to an increased sense of interconnectedness? Front Digit Humanit. (2019) 6:9. doi: 10.3389/fdigh.2019.00009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Shiota MN, Keltner D, Mossman A. The nature of awe: elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cogn Emot. (2007) 21:944–63. doi: 10.1080/02699930600923668

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Erowid E, Erowid F, Thyssen S. Erowid experience vaults. (2022). Available online at: https://erowid.org/exp (accessed on May 15, 2022).

Google Scholar

91. Belser AB, Agin-Liebes G, Swift TC, Terrana S, Devenot N, Friedman H, et al. Patient experiences of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Humanist Psychol. (2017) 57:002216781770688. doi: 10.1177/0022167817706884

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Cott C, Rock A. Phenomenology of N,N-dimethyltryptamine use: a thematic analysis. J Sci Explor. (2008) 22:359–70.

Google Scholar

93. Replications. Replications. (n.d.). Available online at: https://www.reddit.com/r/replications/ (accessed on May 5, 2022).

Google Scholar

94. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. (2007) 39:175–91. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Puis L, Suija K, Ööpik P, Lomp Ü, Meister T, Kivisto K. Kokkuvõte kliinilisest auditist ,,Depressiooni diagnostika ja ravi esmatasandil“. Eesti Arst. (2017) 96:69–72.

Google Scholar

96. Davidson J, Turnbull CD, Strickland R, Miller R, Graves K. The Montgomery-Åsberg depression scale: reliability and validity. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (1986) 73:544–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb02723.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Stoliker D, Egan GF, Friston KJ, Razi A. Neural mechanisms and psychology of psychedelic ego dissolution. PsyArXiv. [Preprint]. (2021). doi: 10.31234/osf.io/aewtm

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. JASP Team,. JASP (Version 0.16.1)[Computer software]. Amsterdam (2022).

Google Scholar

99. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. (2006) 3:77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Effect Index. (n.d.). Cognitive Effects. Available online at: https://effectindex.com/categories/cognitive-effects (accessed on May 5, 2022).

Google Scholar

101. Aday JS, Davoli CC, Bloesch EK. Psychedelics and virtual reality: parallels and applications. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. (2020) 10:2045125320948356. doi: 10.1177/2045125320948356

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Amada N, Lea T, Letheby C, Shane J. Psychedelic experience and the narrative self: an exploratory qualitative study. J Conscious Stud. (2020) 27:6–33.

Google Scholar

103. Grinspoon L, Doblin R. Psychedelics as catalysts of insight-oriented psychotherapy. Soc Res. (2001) 68:677–95.

Google Scholar

104. Martinez-Tejada LA, Puertas Gonzalez A, Yoshimura N, Koike Y. Videogame design as a elicit tool for emotion recognition experiments. Conference proceedings - IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. Piscataway: IEEE (2020). p. 4320–6. doi: 10.1109/SMC42975.2020.9283321

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Gaggioli A. Transformative experience design. In: Gaggioli A, Ferscha A, Riva G, Dunne S, Viaud-Delmon I editors. Human computer confluence. Berlin: De Gruyter (2016). p. 96–121. doi: 10.1515/9783110471137-006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Riva G. Virtual reality in clinical psychology. In: Asmundson G editor. Reference module in neuroscience and biobehavioral psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier (2022). p. 91–105. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818697-8.00006-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Beck AT. Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York, NY: International Universities Press (1976). doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1977.31.4.633

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Brewin CR. Understanding cognitive behaviour therapy: a retrieval competition account. Behav Res Ther. (2006) 44:765–84. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.02.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Ellis A. Rational psychotherapy and individual psychology. J Individ Psychol. (1957) 13:38–44.

Google Scholar

110. Hartogsohn I. The meaning-enhancing properties of psychedelics and their mediator role in psychedelic therapy, spirituality, and creativity. Front Neurosci. (2018) 12:129. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Carhart-Harris RL, Friston KJ. REBUS and the anarchic brain: toward a unified model of the brain action of psychedelics. Pharmacol Rev. (2019) 71:316–44. doi: 10.1124/pr.118.017160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Gashi L, Sandberg S, Pedersen W. Making “bad trips” good: how users of psychedelics narratively transform challenging trips into valuable experiences. Int J Drug Policy. (2021) 87:102997. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102997

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Wolff M, Evens R, Mertens L, Koslowski M, Betzler F, Gründer G, et al. Learning to let go: a cognitive-behavioral model of how psychedelic therapy promotes acceptance. Front Psychiatry (2020) 11:5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Johnson MW, Richards WA, Griffiths RR. Human hallucinogen research: guidelines for safety. J Psychopharmacol. (2008) 22:603–20. doi: 10.1177/0269881108093587

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behav Ther. (2004) 35:639–65. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80013-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Hayes SC, Follette VM, Linehan MM. Mindfulness and acceptance: expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition. New York, NY: The Guilford Press (2004).

Google Scholar

117. Hartogsohn I. Set and setting in the Santo Daime. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:651037. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.651037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Analayo B. Satipaṭṭhāna: the direct path to realization. Cambridge: Windhorse Publications (2004).

Google Scholar

119. Brahmavamso A. The basic method of meditation. Petaling Jaya: Buddhist Gem Fellowship (1998).

Google Scholar

120. Kabat-Zinn J. Coming to our senses healing ourselves and the world through mindfulnes. Westport, CT: Hyperion (2005).

Google Scholar

121. Craske MG, Treanor M, Conway CC, Zbozinek T, Vervliet B. Maximizing exposure therapy: an inhibitory learning approach. Behav Res Ther. (2014) 58:10–23. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Emmelkamp PMG, Meyerbröker K. Virtual reality therapy in mental health. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. (2021) 17:495–519. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-115923

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Meyerbröker K. Virtual reality in clinical practice. Clin Psychol Psychother. (2021) 28:463–5. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2616

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Chirico A, Glaveanu VP, Cipresso P, Riva G, Gaggioli A. Awe enhances creative thinking: an experimental study. Creat Res J. (2018) 30:123–31. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2018.1446491

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Riva G, Baños RM, Botella C, Mantovani F, Gaggioli A. Transforming experience: the potential of augmented reality and virtual reality for enhancing personal and clinical change. Front Psychiatry. (2016) 7:164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00164

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Hendricks PS. Awe: a putative mechanism underlying the effects of classic psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy. Int Rev Psychiatry. (2018) 30:331–42. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2018.1474185

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Chirico A, Gaggioli A. The potential role of awe for depression: reassembling the puzzle. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:617715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.617715

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Ritter SM, Damian RI, Simonton DK, van Baaren RB, Strick M, Derks J, et al. Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. J Exp Soc Psychol. (2012) 48:961–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Aqil M, Roseman L. More than meets the eye: the role of sensory dimensions in psychedelic brain dynamics, experience, and therapeutics. Neuropharmacology. (2022) 223:109300. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Vasser M, Aru J. Guidelines for immersive virtual reality in psychological research. Curr Opin Psychol. (2020) 36:71–6. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Perry G, Polito V, Thompson WF. Rhythmic chanting and mystical states across traditions. Brain Sci. (2021) 11:101. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Vieten C, Wahbeh H, Cahn B, MacLean K, Estrada M, Mills P, et al. Future directions in meditation research: recommendations for expanding the field of contemplative science. PLoS One. (2018) 13:e0205740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205740

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Lynn SJ, Evans J. Hypnotic suggestion produces mystical-type experiences in the laboratory: a demonstration proof. Psychol Conscious Theory Res Pract. (2017) 4:23–37. doi: 10.1037/cns0000105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Russ SL, Elliott MS. Antecedents of mystical experience and dread in intensive meditation. Psychol Conscious Theory Res Pract. (2017) 4:38–53. doi: 10.1037/cns0000119

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Pan X, Hamilton A. F. C. Why and how to use virtual reality to study human social interaction: the challenges of exploring a new research landscape. Br J Psychol. (2018) 109:395–417. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12290

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Riva G, Dakanalis A, Mantovani F. Leveraging psychology of virtual body for health and wellness. In: Shyam Sundar S editor. The handbook of the psychology of communication technology. Hoboken, NY: Wiley Blackwell (2015). doi: 10.1002/9781118426456.ch24

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Gaggioli A, Chirico A, Triberti S, Riva G. Transformative interactions: designing positive technologies to foster self-transcendence and meaning. Annu Rev CyberTher Telemed. (2016) 14:169–74.

Google Scholar

138. Muthukumaraswamy SD, Forsyth A, Lumley T. Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials. Exp Rev Clin Pharmacol. (2021) 14:1133–52. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1933434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Burke MJ, Blumberger DM. Caution at psychiatry’s psychedelic frontier. Nat Med. (2021) 27:1687–8. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01524-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

140. Hutten NRPW, Mason N, Dolder P, Theunissen E, Holze F, Liechti M, et al. Mood and cognition after administration of low LSD doses in healthy volunteers: a placebo controlled dose-effect finding study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2020) 41:81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.10.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

141. Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV. Transcending the self in immersive virtual reality. Computer. (2014) 47:24–30. doi: 10.1109/MC.2014.198

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Lenggenhager B, Tadi T, Metzinger T, Blanke O. Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science. (2007) 317:1096–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1143439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Sekula AD, Downey L, Puspanathan P. Virtual reality as a moderator of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy. Front Psychol. (2022) 13:813746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813746

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Slater M, Gonzalez-Liencres C, Haggard P, Vinkers C, Gregory-Clarke R, Jelley S, et al. The ethics of realism in virtual and augmented reality. Front Virtual Real. (2020) 1:1. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2020.00001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Moroz M, Carhart-Harris RL. Employing synergistic interactions of virtual reality and psychedelics in neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 IEEE workshop on augmented and virtual realities for good, VAR4Good 2018. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE (2018). doi: 10.1109/VAR4GOOD.2018.8576882

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

146. Gómez-Busto FJ, Ortiz MI. Virtual reality and psychedelics for the treatment of psychiatric disease: a systematic literature review. Clin Neuropsychiatry. (2020) 17:365–80. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20200606

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Díaz JL. Sacred plants and visionary consciousness. Phenomenol Cogn Sci. (2010) 9:159–70. doi: 10.1007/s11097-010-9157-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Strassman R, Qualls C, Uhlenhuth E, Kellner R. Dose-response study of N,N-dimethyltryptamine in humans. II. Subjective effects and preliminary results of a new rating scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (1994) 51:98–108. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950020022002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Effect Index. (n.d.). After images. Available online at: https://effectindex.com/effects/after-images (accessed on May 5, 2022).

Google Scholar

150. Dubois J, VanRullen R. Visual trails: do the doors of perception open periodically? PLoS Biol. (2011) 9:e1001056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Gersztenkorn D, Lee AG. Palinopsia revamped: a systematic review of the literature. Surv Ophthalmol. (2015) 60:1–35. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.06.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Muthukumaraswamy SD, Carhart-Harris R, Moran R, Brookes M, Williams T, Errtizoe D, et al. Broadband cortical desynchronization underlies the human psychedelic state. J Neurosci. (2013) 33:15171–83. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2063-13.2013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Effect Index. (n.d.). Drifting. Available online at: https://effectindex.com/effects/drifting (accessed on May 5, 2022).

Google Scholar

154. St John G. The breakthrough experience: DMT hyperspace and its liminal aesthetics. Anthropol Conscious. (2018) 29:57–76. doi: 10.1111/anoc.12089

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Hammond C. DMT: ‘the spirit molecule’ explained. (n.d.). Available online at: https://www.world-of-lucid-dreaming.com/dmt.html (accessed on May 5, 2022).

Google Scholar

156. McKenna T. True hallucinations: being an account of the author’s extraordinary adventures in the devil’s paradise. San Francisco, CA: HarperOne (1994).

Google Scholar

157. White F. The overview effect: space exploration and human evolution. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin (2014). doi: 10.2514/4.103223

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Yaden DB, Iwry J, Slack KJ, Eichstaedt JC, Zhao Y, Vaillant GE, et al. The overview effect: awe and self-transcendent experience in space flight. Psychol Conscious Theory Res Pract. (2016) 3:1–11. doi: 10.1037/cns0000086

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Stepanova ER, Quesnel D, Riecke BE. Space–a virtual frontier: how to design and evaluate a virtual reality experience of the overview effect. Front Digit Humanit. (2019) 6:7. doi: 10.3389/fdigh.2019.00007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

160. Weibel DL. The overview effect and the ultraview effect: how extreme experiences in/of outer space influence religious beliefs in astronauts. Religions. (2020) 11:418. doi: 10.3390/rel11080418

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

161. Grof S. LSD Psychotherapy. Alameda, CA: Hunter House (1980).

Google Scholar

162. Lebedev AV, Lövdén M, Rosenthal G, Feilding A, Nutt D, Carhart-Harris R. Finding the self by losing the self: neural correlates of ego-dissolution under psilocybin. Hum Brain Mapp. (2015) 36:3137–53. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22833

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

163. Letheby C, Gerrans P. Self unbound: ego dissolution in psychedelic experience. Neurosci Conscious. (2017) 2017:nix016. doi: 10.1093/nc/nix016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

164. Millière R, Carhart-Harris RL, Roseman L, Trautwein FM, Berkovich-Ohana A. Psychedelics, meditation, and self-consciousness. Front Psychol. (2018) 9:1475. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01475

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

165. Millière R. Looking for the self: phenomenology, neurophysiology and philosophical significance of drug-induced ego dissolution. Front Hum Neurosci. (2017) 11:245. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00245

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

166. Nour MM, Carhart-Harris RL. Psychedelics and the science of self-experience. Br J Psychiatry. (2017) 210:177–9.

Google Scholar

167. Milliere R. Varieties of selflessness. Philos Mind Sci. (2020) 1:8.

Google Scholar

Keywords: psychedelics, virtual reality, therapy, therapeutic mechanisms of psychedelics, altered states of consciousness (ASC), VR-augmented therapy, depression, depressive disorder

Citation: Kaup KK, Vasser M, Tulver K, Munk M, Pikamäe J and Aru J (2023) Psychedelic replications in virtual reality and their potential as a therapeutic instrument: an open-label feasibility study. Front. Psychiatry 14:1088896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1088896

Received: 03 November 2022; Accepted: 10 February 2023;
Published: 01 March 2023.

Edited by:

Jacob Aday, University of California, San Francisco, United States

Reviewed by:

Hannes Simon Kettner, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
Isabel Wießner, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

Copyright © 2023 Kaup, Vasser, Tulver, Munk, Pikamäe and Aru. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Karl Kristjan Kaup, kaup.kristjan@gmail.com; Jaan Aru, jaan.aru@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.