AUTHOR=Shmulewitz Dvora , Levitin Maor Daniel , Eliashar Roi , Mikulincer Mario , Lev-Ran Shaul 

TITLE=Network analysis of Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) 3.1 items for non-medical use of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, prescription sedatives, prescription stimulants, and prescription opioids

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychiatry

VOLUME=Volume 16 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1541628

DOI=10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1541628

ISSN=1664-0640

ABSTRACT=BackgroundAt-risk substance use is a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality worldwide. The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test 3.1 (ASSIST) is widely used to screen for such use.ObjectivesUsing network analysis to reframe risky substance use as a web of interacting ASSIST symptoms to provide important suggestions about potential mechanisms underlying risky use.MethodsCross-sectional data on the ASSIST was collected via an online survey from a general population sample of Jewish adults in Israel (N=4,002; 50.4% women). Network analysis was carried out for ASSIST symptoms for non-medical use of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, prescription sedatives, prescription stimulants, and prescription opioids. First, networks were modeled for each substance, to explore the following research questions: which symptoms were most strongly related? and what are the key symptoms that compose the networks? Second, networks were compared to determine if symptom relationships differed between substances.ResultsBasic similarities were observed across substances, e.g., strongest direct associations between frequency of use and craving, and frequency of substance related problems and role interference. Role interference and craving appeared to play important roles in the networks. Differences were observed between substances in strength of associations between symptoms.ConclusionNetwork structures were similar across substances, suggesting that similar intervention approaches may be appropriate, with substance-specific strategies as warranted. Among those who use substances, addressing the effects of role interference and craving in risky substance use may help reduce substance-related harms and limit progression to full blown disorder.