AUTHOR=Liu Siqi , Chen Yixiao , Zhang Lei , Zhang Xu , Min Jiali , Yang Yaqin , Li Manru , Cai Zheya , Sun Yanwei , Wang Jiayi , Chen Zhihao , Li Hui , Chen Fazhan , Hou Jiaojiao , Shui Ruyi , Zhou Guoquan , Zhu Enzhao 

TITLE=Biomarker signatures as predictors of future impulsivity in schizophrenia: a multi-center study

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychiatry

VOLUME=Volume 16 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1620131

DOI=10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1620131

ISSN=1664-0640

ABSTRACT=IntroductionWhile clinical scales for impulsivity assessment in psychiatric settings are widely used, evidence linking laboratory biomarkers to impulsivity remains limited. This study evaluated the prognostic value of routinely collected biomarkers for future impulsivity risk and developed a machine learning–based prediction model.MethodsWe analyzed data from 1,496 first-admission schizophrenia (SCZ) patients across four specialized psychiatric hospitals (2016–2023). A total of 99 features, including 91 routinely tested biomarker measurements, four treatment-related indicators, and four demographic or psychometric variables, were evaluated. Impulsivity was assessed using the Impulsive Behavior Risk Assessment Scale within one week of admission. Five machine learning models were trained with 10-fold cross-validation (n=993) and externally validated in an independent cohort (n=503). Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and biomarker importance was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).ResultsOf 1,496 SCZ patients, 882 (59.0%) exhibited high impulsivity. CatBoost outperformed other models, achieving an AUROC of 0.749 in cross-validation and 0.719 in external testing. SHAP values identified key biomarkers, revealing heterogeneous response patterns for uric acid (UA), globulin (GLO), apolipoprotein E (APOE), and others. Combining biomarkers with clinical data improved prediction, increasing AUROC from 0.652 to 0.749 in cross-validation and from 0.655 to 0.721 in external testing. Subgroup analyses revealed sex-specific patterns, with exploratory analysis suggesting sex-modified relationships between UA and impulsivity.DiscussionThese findings highlight the utility of routine biomarkers for early identification of high-risk individuals with SCZ and suggest the importance of incorporating sex-specific factors in predictive modeling.