<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Psychol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Psychology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Psychol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-1078</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736883</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Psychology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Online Star vs. Celebrity Endorsements: The Role of Self-Concept and Advertising Appeal in Influencing Purchase Intention</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Pengfei</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/836117/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Xiaojing</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Yi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Chaojing</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Liying</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>Biao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>School of Economics and Management, Southwest University</institution>, <addr-line>Chongqing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University</institution>, <addr-line>Wuhan</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Business School, Hubei University</institution>, <addr-line>Wuhan</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Department of Business Administration, Shandong Labor Vocational and Technical College</institution>, <addr-line>Jinan</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>China Academy of Civil Aviation Science and Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Nora J. Rifon, Michigan State University, United States</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Jihoon (Jay) Kim, University of Alabama, United States; Arry Widodo, Telkom University, Indonesia</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Xiaojing Lu, <email>swuship@sina.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Personality and Social Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>23</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>736883</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>23</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>18</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2021 Shi, Lu, Zhou, Sun, Wang and Geng.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Shi, Lu, Zhou, Sun, Wang and Geng</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Despite the fact that companies increasingly value online star endorsements as Internet celebrity economy booms, scientific knowledge on the effect of online star endorsements on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention is limited. Based on the theories of self and construal level theory, this study investigates the impact of online star vs. celebrity endorsements on purchase intention and explores the underlying mechanism as well as boundary conditions. The results of four studies reveal the following: (1) Compared with no endorsement, both celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements lead to increases in consumers&#x2019; purchase intention, with no significant difference between the two. (2) Self-concept mediates these relationships; specifically, celebrity and online star endorsements activate the ideal and actual self respectively, and enhance consumers&#x2019; willingness to purchase. (3) The effect of endorsements on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention is moderated by advertising appeals. That is, celebrity endorsements enhance purchase intention when consumers are exposed to symbolic appeals in advertisements, and online star endorsements enhance purchase intention when it is matched with functional advertising appeals.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>celebrity endorsement</kwd>
<kwd>online star endorsement</kwd>
<kwd>self-concept</kwd>
<kwd>purchase intention</kwd>
<kwd>advertising appeal</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="70"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
<word-count count="11700"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="S1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Online stars, also known as Internet celebrities (<italic>wang hong</italic> in Chinese) are becoming most popular with Internet users due to the rapid expansion of social media platforms, such as YouTube, Facebook, Sina Weibo, Tik Tok, and Kuaishou. While social celebrities remain popular influencers in mainstream markets and are highly valued by companies, online stars have increasingly begun to be deployed as endorsers, for example, Bella Hadid endorsing Nike, and Papi Jiang and Zhang Dayi advertising Weibo Story. Unlike traditional celebrities, online stars often thrive in ordinary social groups like common consumers, who perceive a sense of affinity and closeness with these stars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Stever and Lawson, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Clarke et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Zhang et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Although many academic studies have confirmed the economic value of various endorser types (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Ayeh, 2015</xref>), little is known about the effectiveness of celebrity vs. online star endorsements. While researches have focused on the development of online stars, measurement of their influence, and relationships between online stars and fans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abidin and Thompson, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Clarke et al., 2016</xref>), few have examined the effect of online stars and traditional celebrities on purchase intention. Further, as businesses increasingly rely on social media platforms to promote their products, consumers are changing their purchasing habits, their state of mind, cognition or perception (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">L&#x0103;z&#x0103;roiu et al., 2020</xref>). Thus, their self-concept and purchase intention are also influenced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Verwijmeren et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Krishna, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Vrontis et al., 2021</xref>). Although the underlying processes of endorser effect have been explained by the source-attractiveness model, meaning transfer theory, matching theory, or elaboration likelihood model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Erdogan, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Erdogan and Baker, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kerr et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Zamudio, 2016</xref>), little is known about the role of the activated self-concept&#x2014;either the ideal self or actual self&#x2014;on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention. What&#x2019;s more, substantial literature has both categorized advertising appeals, such as rational and emotional appeals, hard-selling and soft-selling appeals, thought and sensory appeals, and symbolic and functional appeals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Shavitt, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Gauzente and Roy, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Lantos, 2015</xref>), and discussed the moderating effects of these appeals on various factors like consumers, cultures, products, channels, and celebrities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chang, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Choi et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Vazifehdoust et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Kunkel et al., 2018</xref>). However, research has remained largely dedicated to matching symbolic and functional appeals with different product categories but has failed to match them with celebrity and online star endorsements.</p>
<p>To address this research gap, the current study focuses on the effects of celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention. Specifically, we address the following questions: (1) What is the effect of online star endorsement (vs. no endorsement) on purchase intention? Is there a significant difference between the effects of celebrity endorsement and online star endorsement on purchase intention? (2) What is the psychological mechanism underlying the effects of these two types of endorsements? (3) How are these effects moderated by symbolic and functional advertising appeals?</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>Theory and Hypotheses</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Online Stars and Social Celebrities</title>
<p>Online stars, also called cyberspace stars, web celebrities, online celebrities, or web influencers, are usually focal figures who attract numerous fans by creating and enthusiastically sharing original texts, pictures, or videos on social media (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Stever and Lawson, 2013</xref>). They gain personal influence and public recognition by frequent interactions with fans, or present desires and wishes that are not fulfilled in practical life to draw massive attention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Zhou et al., 2018</xref>). Despite their increasing influence in endorsements, online stars have not been consistently defined across scientific researches. The current study defines &#x201C;online stars&#x201D; as self-empowered individuals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Tiggemann and Slater, 2013</xref>) who gain fame and recognition by featuring self-generated content and frequently interacting with a large follower base on social media (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Wood and Burkhalter, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Schouten et al., 2020</xref>), becoming key opinion formers and online broadcasters and hence transforming social capital into cash.</p>
<p>Unlike online stars, social celebrities are often famous actors, singers, artists, supermodels, or athletes, etc., who gain social influence with their professional talent in specific fields and are frequently shown to general public <italic>via</italic> various media forms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Driessens, 2013</xref>). With their positive images in traditional media channels and social interactions, they gain fame and reputation and are greatly favored by certain social groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Turner, 2004</xref>). Although online stars are sometimes also called &#x201C;online/web celebrities,&#x201D; the concept of &#x201C;celebrities&#x201D; is adopted in a more traditional sense in the current study, referring to individuals who become famous and popular by showing their personal talent and attractiveness, in conventional channels like movies, pictures, commercials and videos. As representatives of certain individual, social and commercial images, they are usually viewed by the public as cultural symbols.</p>
<p>Although celebrities and online stars share similarities, such as being considered to be popular, professional, and trustworthy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Choi and Rifon, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Khamis et al., 2017</xref>), the two groups actually differ greatly. Social celebrities normally gain public recognition <italic>via</italic> traditional and social media, while online stars build their reputation almost exclusively by social media platforms. Further, unlike celebrities who gain fame through contents in various media forms, online stars become self-empowered with their self-generated contents. What&#x2019;s more, online stars are often &#x201C;grassroots&#x201D; people from all walks of life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Russell and Rasolofoarison, 2017</xref>). Whereas traditional celebrities seem to be distant, online stars seem more like ordinary people and are perceived as closer to consumers. Hence, <italic>social distance</italic>, or the perceived psychological distance between the two types of endorsers and their fans, is the key factor differentiating celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Stever and Lawson, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Liu and Qin, 2014</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Celebrity Endorsements, Online Star Endorsements, and Consumers&#x2019; Purchase Intention</title>
<p>As the predictor of consumers&#x2019; buying behavior, purchase intention refers to the likelihood or desire of a customer to buy a certain product (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Burke et al., 1985</xref>). Numerous factors affect purchase intentions, such as consumer personality characteristics, product internal cues, product external cues, and consumption scenarios, etc. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Dodds et al., 1991</xref>). Advertising, a combination of the above factors, has become an effective marketing tool. For both online and offline consumers, once they are exposed to different types of endorsement advertisements, they associate the content with the endorsed products, thereby increasing purchases intention.</p>
<p>Celebrity endorsement is a long-standing and effective driver of consumers&#x2019; purchase intention. Celebrities&#x2019; public image and fame engender trust in consumers and increase their willingness to purchase the endorsed products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Ayeh, 2015</xref>). Moreover, celebrities embody special and symbolic meanings in certain sociocultural environments. Thus, symbolic meaning is injected into the products or brands that they endorse <italic>via</italic> the process of meaning transfer in consumer purchasing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Knoll and Matthes, 2016</xref>). Consumers are also likely to buy products endorsed by celebrities due to the bandwagon and halo effects. In addition, research has demonstrated that advertisements with celebrity endorsements are associated with higher information processing speeds, better product evaluations and increased purchase intention, compared with advertisements lacking such endorsements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Rs and Alawadhi, 2020</xref>). Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>H1: Compared with no endorsement, celebrity endorsements have a positive effect on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention.</p>
 </list-item>
</list>
<p>Online star endorsements represent a new type of endorsement. Similar to conventional celebrities in the sense that both are considered credible, popular and professional, online stars are recruited by more and more companies to present information and recommend purchases to their huge fan bases through impression management, expressiveness and persuasiveness. Online star endorsements are statements made by online celebrities in support of products or brands <italic>via</italic> advertisements on both traditional and social media. Based on the extant literature on famous persons, we posit that online star endorsements promote consumers&#x2019; purchase intention and that the attractiveness or personal charisma of these stars directly influences purchase intention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Park and Lin, 2020</xref>). More importantly, the unique qualities of online stars, such as their amiable, topical, and interactive nature, all contribute to consumers&#x2019; willingness to buy. Most online stars are considered &#x201C;common&#x201D; people and are naturally more amiable and appealing to consumers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Levordashka and Utz, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Jin and Ryu, 2020</xref>). Therefore, consumers are more likely to accept online stars&#x2019; product recommendations. In public discussions, online stars are topical, and their comments boost interactions, thereby promoting the dissemination of their recommendations among the fans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Elmira and Oxana, 2018</xref>). Online stars also use social media frequently to communicate with fans, which further engenders trust from these fans, who unconsciously transfer this trust to the recommended product information (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Gong and Li, 2017</xref>). Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>H2: Compared with no endorsement, online star endorsements have a positive effect on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention.</p>
 </list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Celebrity Endorsements, Online Star Endorsements, Ideal Self, and Actual Self</title>
<p><italic>Self-concept</italic> is defined as a person&#x2019;s cognitive and affective understanding of who and what they are (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Joseph, 1982</xref>). Individuals have multiple selves but see themselves as a holistic self that is activated and stabilized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Wang et al., 2000</xref>). Following most literature on consumer research, we assume that consumers&#x2019; selves take the forms of an ideal self and an actual self (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Sirgy, 1982</xref>). The ideal self is shaped by imagined ideals and goals related to what the person believes that he would like to be or aspire to become, whereas the actual self is based on the person&#x2019;s perceived self-reality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Sirgy, 1982</xref>). When activated, self-concept determines one&#x2019;s perception of and response to the environment. An individual is more willing to strengthen this self-concept and strive to seek self-enhancement or self-congruence through consuming behaviors, such as buying, presenting, or using certain products that are considered to represent an extension of the self. In this context, self-congruence theory postulates that consumers judge their self-image based on their perception of how closely their self-concept fits with the product&#x2019;s image. Self-enhancement and self-congruence thus have been considered significant theories in analyses of the connection between consumer self-concept and purchase intention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ahn et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>According to <italic>construal level theory</italic>, people make abstract mental construals of distal events that differ by the dimensions of psychological distance. Specifically, as psychological distance increases, people construe objects at a higher (more abstract) level. High-level construals, which include the general, superordinate and core features of events, are simpler, more abstract, schematic, and decontextualized representations. In contrast, low-level construals, which include the incidental and subordinate features of events, are relatively more complex, concrete, contextualized, and unstructured representations. Four dimensions of psychological distance are described in construal level theory: temporal distance, social distance, spatial distance, and hypotheticality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Stephan et al., 2011</xref>). Despite important differences between these four dimensions, all of them affect the construal level similarly with respect to predicting different psychological states, as demonstrated in the literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Milkman et al., 2010</xref>). Studies have found that, temporal distance triggers different construal levels for people, leading to the production of different selves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Kivetz and Tyler, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Freitas et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Rogers and Bazerman, 2008</xref>). The social distance generated by an individual&#x2019;s perception of social objects should have a similar effect. Therefore, we introduce construal level theory to explain why celebrity endorsement and online star endorsement arouse different self-concepts.</p>
<p>When consumers view celebrity endorsements in advertisements, they focus on the celebrities, who are idols in their mind and are perceived to be socially distant. This triggers a high-level construal, motivating the consumer to represent themselves using abstract, core, essential and general features and generating a self-concept that congruent with their own or others&#x2019; expectations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Stephan et al., 2011</xref>). In this way, celebrity endorsements inspire the ideal self, and consumers strive to maintain a stable and coherent ideal self as a means of self-reflection. As the buying process is an interaction between advertised product information and consumer self-image (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Knoll and Matthes, 2016</xref>), consumers are likely to change their attitude in response to the influence of celebrity endorsers. That is, activation of the ideal self leads consumers to pay attention to product self-presentation in advertisements. Congruence between product self-presentation and self-image drives consumers to associate the product with their personal image and social status, fostering a closer product&#x2013;consumer connection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Su and Reynolds, 2017</xref>). Consumers who perceive the product as a projection of their self-image and a symbol of the endorsing celebrity buy it to maintain, extend and enhance their ideal selves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Hong and Zinkhan, 2010</xref>). Hence, the product is a better match for the ideal self and thus promotes purchase intention. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>H3: The effect of celebrity endorsements on purchase intention is mediated by consumers&#x2019; ideal self.</p>
 </list-item>
</list>
<p>Similarly, when consumers view online star endorsements in advertisements, they focus on the online stars, who are perceived to be common persons or even friends. This perception of natural social closeness results in a low-level construal, diverting consumer s&#x2019; attention from inner features. Thus, consumers represent themselves using concrete, superficial, subordinate and contextualized psychological features and thus generating a self-concept at close range (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Qian and Park, 2021</xref>). In this way, online star endorsements activate the actual self, leading consumers to pay more attention to the actual functional value of the product, instead of its symbolic value. Strengthened as signifiers, online stars are more closely linked with the recommended products than with idols or dreams (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Khamis et al., 2017</xref>). To speed up the spread of information, these stars usually aim to facilitate the understanding of product information and thus highlight a product&#x2019;s functional value. In this case, consumers are likely to buy products endorsed by online stars to achieve a congruent self-image and extend the actual self (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Sirgy, 1982</xref>). Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>H4: The effect of online star endorsements on purchase intention is mediated by the consumers&#x2019; actual self.</p>
 </list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>Moderating Effects of Symbolic Appeal and Functional Appeal</title>
<p>Although social media platforms, such as Sino Weibo, WeChat, and Kuaishou, provide new opportunities for celebrities to promote themselves and interact with fans, the mysteriousness, distance, and idolatry associated with these celebrities remain unaffected. They remain symbolic as distant idols and dreams that are not readily approachable. The social distance between consumers and celebrities leads to activation of the ideal self, which represents consumers&#x2019; expectations and ambition. As a result, consumers who purchase the product are willing to trade some functional value, or even precious resources like time and money, in exchange for rewards, such as increased expression of their personality, identity and image. In advertisements, symbolic appeal means more emphasis on representing symbolic meaning for consumers, on the basis of creating an emotional state of mind for consumers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Johar and Sirgy, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Choi et al., 2012</xref>). As symbolic appeal in advertising is anchored on creating ideal goals and images and delivering a certain lifestyle, social status, and signified meaning <italic>via</italic> products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Wolter et al., 2016</xref>), it is a better match for consumers whose ideal self is activated by celebrity endorsements. Such consumers are more likely to purchase products endorsed by celebrities to achieve a more congruent and better extended ideal self (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang and Scheinbaum, 2018</xref>). Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>H5: Compared with functional appeal, symbolic appeal in advertisements strengthens the relationship between celebrity endorsements and consumers&#x2019; purchase intention.</p>
 </list-item>
</list>
<p>Online stars use social media platforms to release pictures, texts and videos that represent real self-images and to interact frequently with their followers. As noted previously, online stars are perceived to be ordinary people, which reduces their social distance from consumers. These interactions are more likely to activate the actual self. To guide action, such consumers who purchase a product are more likely to sacrifice internal value for increased instrumental and practical value. Functional appeal in an advertisement involves informing consumers of the main functions, outstanding performance and comparative advantages of the product <italic>via</italic> concrete, peripheral, and functional messages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Johar and Sirgy, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ashley and Tuten, 2015</xref>). In this case, consumers&#x2019; actual self is triggered by online star endorsements, resulting in a preference for functional appeal in advertisements. Such consumers are more likely to purchase products endorsed by online stars to achieve a more congruent and better extended actual self (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ahn et al., 2013</xref>). Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>H6: Compared with symbolic appeal, functional appeal in advertisements strengthens the relationship between online star endorsements and consumers&#x2019; purchase intention.</p>
 </list-item>
</list>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods|results" id="S3">
<title>Methods and Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Study Overview</title>
<p>We conducted four studies to test our hypotheses. In Study 1, we examined the influences of celebrity and online star endorsements on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention and determined that both associations were positive. In Studies 2 and 3, we explored these positive associations and determined that they are mediated by consumers&#x2019; ideal self and actual self, respectively. Finally, in Study 4, we showed that this mediation effect is conditional upon the type of advertising appeals.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>Measurements</title>
<p>To measure the constructs in our studies, we used or adapted established scales with reference to prior research (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) including all study constructs produced a satisfactory overall fit. Factor loadings (more than 0.700), Cronbach&#x2019;s alphas (over 0.700), CRs (greater than 0.700), and AVEs (ranging from 0. 529 to 0. 783) all point to high levels of reliability and convergent validity of the measurements (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). In addition, the square root of the AVE value is higher than the correlation coefficients for all latent variables, indicating that high discriminant validity.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Construct measurements.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2">Variables</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Scale items</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Factor loading</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Cronbach&#x2019;s &#x03B1;</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Endorsers</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Celebrities CR = 0.846 <italic>AVE</italic> = 0.578</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A1: This celebrity interacts with fans occasionally, keeping a sense of mystery.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.744</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.715</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">A2: This celebrity is viewed as an idol, with a strong sense of distance.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.755</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">A3: This celebrity has personal, public, social, and commercial images.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.767</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">A4: This celebrity is authoritative.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.774</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Online stars <italic>CR</italic> = 0.892 <italic>AVE</italic> = 0.673</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">B1: This online star interacts with fans frequently and is amiable.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.834</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.737</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">B2: This online star is viewed as a friend, with little sense of distance.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.833</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">B3: This online star has personal and commercial images.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.801</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">B4: This online star is very down to earth.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.813</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Consumers&#x2019; self-concept</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ideal self <italic>CR</italic> = 0.882 <italic>AVE</italic> = 0.713</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">C1: I can feel that the scenario describes my ideal self-image.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.879</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.835</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">C2: I can feel that the scenario reflects my perfect self-state.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.853</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">C3: Through the scenario, I can positively associate with the ideal self.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.800</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Actual self <italic>CR</italic> = 0.901 <italic>AVE</italic> = 0.752</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">D1: I can feel that the scenario describes my real self-image.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.902</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.878</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">D2: I can feel that the scenario corresponds to my real self-state.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.864</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">D3: Through the scenario, I can objectively associate with the real self in my work.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.834</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Advertising Appeals</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Symbolic appeal <italic>CR</italic> = 0.908 <italic>AVE</italic> = 0.766</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">E1: The product recommended in the advertisement is for people who want the best things in life.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.856</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.846</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">E2: The product recommended in the advertisement makes me stand out in a crowd.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.889</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">E3: The product recommended in the advertisement promotes my self-image.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.881</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Functional appeal <italic>CR</italic> = 0.915 <italic>AVE</italic> = 0.783</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F1: The product recommended in the advertisement is for people who want the most practical things in life.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.868</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.861</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">F2: The product recommended in the advertisement brings conveniences in my life.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.909</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">F3: The product recommended in the advertisement is very useful to me.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.877</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><hr/></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="2">Consumers&#x2019; purchase intention <italic>CR</italic> = 0.818 <italic>AVE</italic> = 0.529</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G1: I am willing to know more about this product.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.755</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.721</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="2"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">G2: I am willing to save the product information for future purchasing reference.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.738</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="2"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">G3: I will like the product recommended in this advertisement.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.700</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="2"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">G4: I am willing to share, discuss and recommend this product with others.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.716</td>
<td valign="top" align="justify"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Pilot Study and Stimuli</title>
<p>We conducted a pilot study to determine the appropriate stimuli for formal experiments. To eliminate confounding variables and ensure good validity and reliability, we used real celebrities and online stars as the experimental dataset. We also drew on authoritative selection methods developed by scholars, such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Sengupta et al. (1997)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Biswas et al. (2006)</xref> to ensure that suitable stimuli were selected for this study.</p>
<p>First, we selected all celebrities who appeared in all rankings, such as Baidu Billboard, Tencent Billboard, and Weibo Billboard, ranked them in order, and finally identified 10 celebrities of different genders, excluding those who had received negative publicity. Second, using the same selection method, we listed 20 online stars who appeared in all rankings, such as China online stars big data report, listed them in general order and finally selected 10 online stars of different genders. Third, we invited 55 undergraduates (M<sub><italic>age</italic></sub> = 21.257 years; 30 female) at a comprehensive university in Wuhan to complete a questionnaire. In this questionnaire, we listed the names of the 10 stars and 10 online stars and attached their photos, which were modified using Photoshop to ensure that they were identical in size, brightness, pixels, and colors. To rule out effects of popularity, expertise, trustworthiness and attractiveness, we introduced the widely used celebrity trait scale developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Ohanian (1991)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ding et al. (2005)</xref>. Specifically, subjects rated on the popularity, expertise, trustworthiness and attractiveness of the celebrities and online stars on 7-point semantic differential scales. For example, expertise was measured by four items with 7-point scales: expert/not an expert, experienced/inexperienced, qualified/unqualified, skilled/unskilled.</p>
<p>Using data from 52 valid questionnaires (those that lacked key information or were answered sloppily were ruled out), we selected Zhao Liying and Papi Jiang, who received the highest scores, to represent female celebrities and online stars, respectively. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>, we found no significant difference between the respondents&#x2019; perceptions of these stimuli in terms of popularity, expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. We further selected Yang Yang and Liu Yu, who also received the highest scores, to represent male celebrities and online stars, respectively. Similarly, we found no significant differences between the respondents&#x2019; perception of the common features of the celebrity and online star (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). To better allow the participants to distinguish between celebrities and online stars in the following formal experiments, we added a text description of each to the stimulus materials, drawing on the research methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Atkin and Block (1983)</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Mean scores of the properties of celebrities and online stars.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Popularity<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Expertise<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Trustworthiness<hr/></td>
<td valign="top" align="center" colspan="3">Attractiveness<hr/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Celebrities</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Online stars</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Celebrities</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Online stars</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Celebrities</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Online stars</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Celebrities</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Online stars</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>P</italic></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pilot study</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.804</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.644</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.662</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.550</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.588</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.870</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.921</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.867</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.873</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.279</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.078</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.555</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Women</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.375</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.083</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.572</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.855</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.096</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.133</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.150</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.188</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pilot study</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.737</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.933</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.432</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.618</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.529</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.655</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.983</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.047</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.857</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.035</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.800</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.417</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Men</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.075</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.740</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.749</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.769</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.327</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.232</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.777</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.112</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Study 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.688</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.744</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.807</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.564</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.532</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.843</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.462</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.403</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.830</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.302</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.032</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.340</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.011</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.937</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.795</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.464</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.115</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.205</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.009</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.309</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Study 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.702</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.667</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.705</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.533</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.426</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.671</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.521</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.596</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.640</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.143</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.227</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.617</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.961</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.973</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.103</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.156</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.501</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.830</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.017</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.307</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Study 3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.516</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.685</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.113</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.346</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.375</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.872</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.865</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.635</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.115</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.122</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.470</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.452</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.859</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.154</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.243</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.960</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.984</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.938</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.188</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Study 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.662</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.836</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.150</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.396</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.455</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.647</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.523</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.571</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.570</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.099</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.893</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.007</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.949</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.134</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.149</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.781</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.818</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.975</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.148</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01, &#x002A;&#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, &#x002A;<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.1.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>After setting our research stimuli, we processed photos of the celebrities, online stars and products as described earlier, and used Photoshop to combine these photos into single images. In each image, the celebrity or online star is shown on the left side and the product is shown in a relatively smaller shape on the right side.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>Study 1</title>
<p>In Study 1, we explored the effects of celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention. We selected a facial cleanser endorsed both by celebrities and by online stars, using a fictitious brand X to rule out any effect of brand association.</p>
<sec id="S3.SS4.SSS1">
<title>Participants and Procedure</title>
<p>One hundred and twenty participants (recruited both on-campus and off-campus) were invited to complete a questionnaire in exchange for a bookmark of &#x00A5;2 as a gift. 117 valid questionnaires were collected (M<sub><italic>age</italic></sub> = 22.836 years, SD<sub><italic>age</italic></sub> = 4.472 years; 56.9% female). Three questionnaires were considered invalid because they lacked key information or were answered sloppily.</p>
<p>First, participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: celebrity endorsement, online star endorsement or no endorsement (shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). They were given materials describing certain conditions, as in the following example: &#x201C;You want to buy a facial cleanser. When you are browsing information on a famous online shopping site, you see an advertisement for Brand X facial cleanser endorsed by celebrities [endorsed by online stars/that is not endorsed].&#x201D; We described celebrities and online stars in the stimulus material and selected Zhao Liying and Papi Jiang as examples of celebrities and online stars, respectively. Specifically, in the celebrity endorsement materials we described as follows: &#x201C;Zhao Liying is now a top star, known as the most popular actress.&#x201D; In the online star endorsement materials, the description read &#x201C;Papi Jiang is an online star with a large number of fans, who is rated as the most popular online personality.&#x201D; Then, referring to the pilot study, we measured the common features of them, to rule out the effects of these characteristics. After that, the participants were asked to complete the remaining three parts of the questionnaire. In the first part, we presented advertisements featuring celebrities, online stars or no endorsers to the participants, who were then asked to rate items concerning obvious celebrity and online star characteristics, such as &#x201C;This celebrity is viewed as an idol, with a strong sense of distance&#x201D; (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The items were adapted from scales by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Hess (2003)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Stever and Lawson (2013)</xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Cohen et al. (2016)</xref>. In the second part, participants were asked to evaluate their purchase intention to purchase the product under the three conditions. This section was based on the scale by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Dodds et al. (1991)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Ma et al. (2015)</xref>, with four items, such as &#x201C;I will like the product recommended in this advertisement&#x201D; (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). All items in this study were rated on 7-point Likert scales (1 = &#x201C;strongly disagree,&#x201D; 7 = &#x201C;strongly agree&#x201D;). In the last part, participants entered their demographic information.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Stimulus material in Study 1 (blurred for legal and copyright reasons). On a famous online shopping site, an advertisement for Brand X facial cleanser is endorsed by celebrities (is endorsed by online stars/is not endorsed). Image reproduced with permission from Rui Chu Cultural Development Co., Ltd.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpsyg-12-736883-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="S3.SS4.SSS2">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS4.SSS2.Px1">
<title>Manipulation Check</title>
<p>We manipulated the perceptions of celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements by assigning participants to different conditions. The results revealed that participants&#x2019; perceptions of the endorsing conditions were consistent with the types of endorsers. A significantly greater number of participants in the celebrity endorsement condition considered the advertisement as being endorsed by celebrities (M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 5.129, <italic>SD</italic> = 1.017; M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 3.397, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.747, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). In the condition of online star endorsement, a significantly greater number of participants considered the advertisement as being endorsed by online stars (M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 2.939, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.887; M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 4.871, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.687, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). Therefore, the manipulation of celebrities and online stars was effective. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>, there were no significant differences between the participants&#x2019; perception of the common traits of celebrities and online stars (M<sub><italic>celebrity popularity</italic></sub> = 4.688, <italic>SD</italic> = 1.011; M<sub><italic>online star</italic> popularity</sub> = 4.744, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.937, <italic>p</italic> = 0.807), (M<sub><italic>celebrity expert</italic><italic>ise</italic></sub> = 4.564, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.795; M<sub><italic>online star</italic> expert<italic>ise</italic></sub> = 4.532, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.464, <italic>p</italic> = 0.843), (M<sub><italic>celebrity trustworthiness</italic></sub> = 4.462, <italic>SD</italic> = 1.115; M<sub><italic>online star</italic> trustworthiness</sub> = 4.403, <italic>SD</italic> = 1.205, <italic>p</italic> = 0.830), (M<sub><italic>celebrity attractiveness</italic></sub> = 5.302, <italic>SD</italic> = 1.009; M<sub><italic>online star attractiveness</italic></sub> = 5.032, <italic>SD</italic> = 1.309, <italic>p</italic> = 0.340).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4.SSS2.Px2">
<title>Hypothesis Testing</title>
<p>One-way ANOVA showed that differences in the product endorsers influenced participants&#x2019; willingness to purchase products [<italic>F</italic>(1, 117) = 37.135, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001]. Compared with no endorsement, both celebrity endorsement (M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 4.903, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.784; M<sub><italic>control</italic></sub> = 3.613, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.656, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) and online star endorsement increased participants&#x2019; purchase intention (M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 4.772, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.766; M<sub><italic>control</italic></sub> = 3.613, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.656, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). These results support Hypotheses 1 and 2. The results also showed that the influences of celebrity endorsers and online star endorsers on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention were not significantly different.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="S3.SS4.SSS3">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The results of Study 1 mainly verified the effects of celebrity and online star endorsements on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention and proved a lack of significant difference between these effects. However, the factors driving this effect were not examined. Therefore, we conducted the following study to explore the mediating mechanism.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS5">
<title>Study 2</title>
<p>The main purpose of Study 2 was to verify that celebrity and online star endorsements activate consumers&#x2019; ideal self or actual self, respectively, thereby enhancing their purchase intention. Specific stimulus information for study 2 is available in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Appendix</xref>.</p>
<sec id="S3.SS5.SSS1">
<title>Participants and Procedure</title>
<p>One hundred and fifty participants (recruited both on-campus and off-campus) were asked to complete the questionnaire in exchange for a bookmark of &#x00A5;2 as a gift. 137 valid questionnaires were collected (M<sub><italic>age</italic></sub> = 23.456 years, SD<sub><italic>age</italic></sub> = 4.451 years; 58.1% female). 13 questionnaires were ruled out because they lacked key information or were answered sloppily.</p>
<p>Like in Study 1, we selected Zhao Liying and Papi Jiang as endorsers in this study; however, we replaced the facial cleanser with a computer, which was fictitiously branded &#x201C;X&#x201D; to ensure the effectiveness of manipulation by avoiding associations with existing brands. We replicated the manipulation procedure involving all other pictures used in Study 1.</p>
<p>We also conducted an experiment to examine the psychological mechanism by which celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements influence purchasing behavior. We replicated all the materials (except the product) and steps used in the previous study and added a new step in which the participants were asked to score their ideal and actual selves using a 4-item scale developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Cohen et al. (2016)</xref>. This step was taken after completion of the first two steps of the experiment. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, the constructs of ideal self and actual self were each measured by three items on 7-point Likert scales.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="S3.SS5.SSS2">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS5.SSS2.Px1">
<title>Manipulation Check</title>
<p>We first confirmed the effectiveness of all manipulations. The results revealed that a significantly greater number of participants in the celebrity endorsement condition considered the advertisement as being endorsed by traditional celebrities (M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 4.889, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.682; M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 2.924, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.782, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). A significantly greater number of participants in the online star endorsement advertisement condition considered the advertisement as being endorsed by online stars (M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 5.095, <italic>SD</italic> = 1.002; M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 3.552, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.852, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). Therefore, the manipulation of celebrities and online stars was effective. There were no significant differences in the participants&#x2019; perceptions of common traits between the celebrities and online stars (M<sub><italic>celebrity popularity</italic></sub> = 4.702, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.961; M<sub><italic>online star</italic> popularity</sub> = 4.667, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.973, <italic>p</italic> = 0.705), (M<sub><italic>celebrity expert</italic><italic>ise</italic></sub> = 4.533, <italic>SD</italic> = 1.103; M<sub><italic>online star</italic> expert<italic>ise</italic></sub> = 4.426, <italic>SD</italic> = 1.156, <italic>p</italic> = 0.671), (M<sub><italic>celebrity trustworthiness</italic></sub> = 4.521, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.501; M<sub><italic>online star</italic> trustworthiness</sub> = 4.596, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.830, <italic>p</italic> = 0.640), (M<sub><italic>celebrity attractiveness</italic></sub> = 5.143, <italic>SD</italic> = 1.017; M<sub><italic>online star</italic> attractiveness</sub> = 5.277, <italic>SD</italic> = 1.307, <italic>p</italic> = 0.617).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS5.SSS2.Px2">
<title>Hypothesis Testing</title>
<p>We conducted a one-way ANOVA to show that different product endorsers influenced the participants&#x2019; willingness to purchase the product [<italic>F</italic>(1, 137) = 39.753, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001]. Compared with no endorsement, both celebrity endorsement (M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsements</italic></sub> = 4.893, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.748; M<sub><italic>control</italic></sub> = 3.694, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.664, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) and online star endorsement led to increases in purchase intention (M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 4.760, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.767; M<sub><italic>control</italic></sub> = 3.694, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.664, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). In different endorsing conditions, we found no significant difference in consumers&#x2019; purchase intention when the product was changed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS5.SSS2.Px3">
<title>Mediation Analysis</title>
<p>Bootstrap analysis was adopted in the current research to test mediation, since causal step regression is limited to models with one mediation variable and continuous variables. As the main effect was verified in Study 1 and 2, referring to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Schouten et al. (2020)</xref>&#x2019;s research process, we only reported the mediating effect results. With a sample size of 5,000 and 95% confidence interval (CI), the mediating effect of ideal self on celebrity endorsement was significant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>), as the CI did not include 0 (BootLLCL = &#x2212;0.239, BootULC = -0.090). In contrast, the mediating effect of actual self under this condition was not significant, as the CI contained 0 (BootLLC = &#x2212;0.076, BootULCL = 0.019). Meanwhile, the mediating effect of actual self on online star endorsement was significant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>), as the CI did not include 0 (BootLLCL = 0.026, BootULCL = 0.164), whereas the mediating effect of ideal self under this condition was not significant, with a CI containing 0 (BootLLC = &#x2212;0.011, BootULC = 0.074). In summary, celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements led to activation of the participants&#x2019; ideal self and actual self, respectively, supporting Hypotheses 3 and 4.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Mediating analysis of celebrity endorsement on purchase intention.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpsyg-12-736883-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Mediating analysis of online star endorsement on purchase intention.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpsyg-12-736883-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="S3.SS5.SSS3">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In addition to providing further support for Hypotheses 1 and 2, the results of Study 2 also provide support for Hypotheses 3 and 4, as they verified the mediating role of self-concept in the effects of celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements on purchase intention. To further explore the mediating role of self-concept from a different perspective, we conducted Study 3 using a priming approach. In the following section, we describe the selection of male rather than female celebrities and online stars and further alteration of product types.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS6">
<title>Study 3</title>
<p>In this study, we followed the approach developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kettle and H&#x00E4;ubl (2011)</xref> to activate the ideal and actual selves, by using the situation of drinking beer in a public or private location as the stimulus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Graeff, 1997</xref>), which is an established way to activate self-concept.</p>
<p>We proved in Study 2 that celebrity endorsements activate consumers&#x2019; ideal self, whereas online star endorsements activate the actual self, both of which promote purchase intention. We then assume that, exposed to celebrity endorsements, consumers with activated ideal self are more willing to buy products endorsed by celebrities. Similarly, after exposure to online star endorsements, consumers with activated actual self are more likely to find online star-endorsing products attractive. To further test our assumptions, we conducted Study 3.</p>
<sec id="S3.SS6.SSS1">
<title>Participants and Procedure</title>
<p>Two hundred participants (recruited both on-campus and off-campus) took part in the study in exchange for a bookmark of &#x00A5;2 as a gift. 183 valid questionnaires were collected (M<sub><italic>age</italic></sub> = 23.803 years, SD<sub><italic>age</italic></sub> = 5.173 years; 59.6% female). Seventeen questionnaires were ruled out because they lacked key information.</p>
<p>In Study 3, we replaced female endorsers with males, specifically Yang Yang and Liu Yu, as selected in the pilot study. Specific stimulus information for study 3 is available in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Appendix</xref>. Similar to study 1, study 3 included a description of male celebrities and online stars. The male celebrity is described as follows, &#x201C;Yang Yang is a celebrity with a large number of fans and is the most popular celebrity.&#x201D; As for online stars, participants read &#x201C;Liu Yu, an online star with a large number of fans, is viewed as a popular online star.&#x201D; We also replaced the computer used in Study 2 with shampoo, which was branded fictitiously as &#x201C;X.&#x201D; We used a 2 (ideal self vs. actual self) &#x00D7; 3 (celebrity vs. online star vs. control) between-subjects design to further test the mediation effect. First, based on the experimental method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Graeff (1997)</xref> to activate ideal self and actual self, we assigned participants randomly to either the ideal self or the actual self group and exposed them to materials that encouraged activation of the ideal or the real self-concept, respectively. The material for ideal self condition read as follows, &#x201C;Imagine you and your friends in a restaurant, bar, lounge, or other public places. You are considering to buy a dozen of beer and have decided to drink them in the public. That is to say, when you drink the beer, there will be a lot of people watching you and the way you drink beer.&#x201D; For actual self condition, it read &#x201C;Suppose you are considering to buy a dozen of beer, and then go home to drink them to relax. Namely, you will drink beer in a private place with no one else present (excluding family members). At this time, you can drink while watching a rented movie, your favorite TV shows, or sports events on TV.&#x201D; Next, we asked the participants to complete the ideal and actual self scales and report their intention to buy the product. Similarly, we measured the popularity, expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness of both celebrities and online stars to rule out the effects of these factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="S3.SS6.SSS2">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS6.SSS2.Px1">
<title>Manipulation Check</title>
<p>We first confirmed the effectiveness of our manipulation. The results of our check revealed that the participants in the actual self group indeed perceived a more realistic version of themselves than those in the ideal self group (M<sub><italic>actual self</italic></sub> = 5.019, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.886; M<sub><italic>ideal self</italic></sub> = 3.500, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.863, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). The participants in the ideal self group reported a higher ideal vs. actual self score (M<sub><italic>ideal self</italic></sub> = 5.008, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.672; M<sub><italic>actual self</italic></sub> = 3.119, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.922, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). We further determined that the manipulation of celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements is appropriate. Our results showed that participants in celebrity endorsement group indeed perceived the advertisement as being endorsed by a celebrity, scoring higher than online star endorsements (M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 4.961, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.671; M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 3.377, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.953, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001), whereas in online star endorsement group, participants reported significantly higher scores for online star endorsements than celebrity endorsements (M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 5.128, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.700; M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 3.190, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.765, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). In addition, no significant difference was observed between the participants&#x2019; perceptions of the common properties of celebrities and online stars (shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS6.SSS2.Px2">
<title>Mediating Effect Analysis</title>
<p>A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between consumer self-concept and endorsement type [<italic>F</italic>(1, 183) = 12.184, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001]. Specifically, participants with activated ideal self-concept are more likely to be motivated to purchase the product with celebrity endorsements compared with those in the online star endorsement group and control group (M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 4.735, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.673; M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 4.092, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.835; M<sub><italic>control</italic></sub> = 3.518, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.909, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). However, when actual self was activated, participants in the online star endorsement group had a higher purchase intention than those in the celebrity endorsement group and control group (M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 5.084, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.742; M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 4.483, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.571; M<sub><italic>control</italic></sub> = 3.654, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.738, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). That is, online star endorsements increased purchase intention by activating consumers&#x2019; actual self-concept. The results supported Hypotheses 3 and 4.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Effects of endorsement types and self-concept on purchase intention.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpsyg-12-736883-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="S3.SS6.SSS3">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The results of Study 3 further proved that consumers&#x2019; self-concept is a key factor connecting celebrity and online star endorsements with consumers&#x2019; purchase intention. However, the first three experiments did not examine the boundary conditions of these effects. We conducted Study 4 to test the moderating effect of appeal types in advertisement.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS7">
<title>Study 4</title>
<p>In this study, to examine the conditional factors for the effects of celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements on purchase intention, we introduced symbolic appeal and functional appeal in advertisements as moderating variables. We then sought appropriate types of verbal descriptions in advertisements. We conducted this study to test Hypotheses 5 and 6.</p>
<sec id="S3.SS7.SSS1">
<title>Participants and Procedure</title>
<p>Three hundred adults (recruited both on-campus and off-campus) participated in exchange for a bookmark of &#x00A5;2 as a gift. 262 valid questionnaires were collected (M<sub><italic>age</italic></sub> = 23.145 years, SD<sub><italic>age</italic></sub> = 4.663 years; 39.3% female). Thirty-eight incomplete questionnaires were ruled out.</p>
<p>We selected celebrities and online stars using the same process described in Study 1, replacing facial cleanser used in that study with a mobile phone, which we branded fictitiously as &#x201C;Y&#x201D; to ensure the effectiveness of manipulation.</p>
<p>The experiment was most similar to that of Study 1, except that the moderating variables were included and measured. We employed a 2 (advertising appeal: symbolic vs. functional) &#x00D7; 3 (endorser: celebrity vs. online star vs. control) between-subjects design to further test the moderating effect. First, the participants were randomly assigned to four treatment groups and two control groups. They read materials similar to those used in Study 1, only with a different product type. Specific stimulus information for this study is available in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Appendix</xref>. Next, we manipulated the advertisement appeal by presenting stimulus materials to the participants and describing the symbolic or functional value accordingly. The symbolic appeal description was as follows: &#x201C;This mobile phone makes you more attractive, helps expressing your personality fully in the crowd, creates a perfect image and ultimate experience for you.&#x201D; For functional appeal, the description read: &#x201C;This mobile phone is absolutely easy to use, with fast operating speed, long battery life, short charging time and ultra-wide camera angle, meeting various needs for work and entertainment.&#x201D; We also measured popularity, expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness of both celebrities and online stars to rule out the effects of these characteristics. Then, we exposed the participants to advertisements endorsed by either celebrities or online stars, or with no endorsers and asked to them complete the measurement items. They also rated the materials in terms of symbolic appeal and functional appeal based on a scale developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bhat and Reddy (1998)</xref>. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, symbolic appeal and functional appeal were each measured with three items on 7-point Likert scales (1 = strongly disagree; 7 = strongly agree), such as &#x201C;The products recommended in this advertisement are for people who want the best things in life.&#x201D;</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="S3.SS7.SSS2">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS7.SSS2.Px1">
<title>Manipulation Check</title>
<p>A one-way ANOVA was used to confirmed the effectiveness of our manipulation. As expected, participants in the celebrity endorsement group reported significantly higher scores for celebrity endorsements than for online star endorsements (M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 5.221, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.845; M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 3.546, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.769, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). Participants in the online star endorsement group reported significantly higher scores for online star endorsements than for celebrity endorsement (M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 5.039, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.715; M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 3.071, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.852, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001).</p>
<p>In symbolic appeal group, participants assigned significantly higher scores to symbolic appeal than to functional appeal (M<sub><italic>symbolic appeal</italic></sub> = 5.118, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.666; M<sub><italic>functional appeal</italic></sub> = 3.541, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.982, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). Conversely, in functional appeal group, participants assigned significantly higher scores to functional appeal than to symbolic appeal (M<sub><italic>functional appeal</italic></sub> = 5.181, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.707; M<sub><italic>symbolic appeal</italic></sub> = 3.216, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.724, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001). Further, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>, participants did not perceive significant differences between the common traits of celebrities and online stars.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS7.SSS2.Px2">
<title>Moderating Effect Analysis</title>
<p>The results of the interaction test showed a significant moderating effect [<italic>F</italic>(1, 262) = 19.328, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001]. Specifically, in the symbolic appeal condition, celebrity endorsements had a significantly stronger effect on purchase intention (M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 5.625, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.450) than online star endorsements (M<sub><italic>online star endorsements</italic></sub> = 4.514, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.558) and no endorsement (M<sub><italic>control</italic></sub> = 3.457, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.834) (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). In the functional appeal condition, online star endorsement had a significantly stronger effect on purchase intention (M<sub><italic>online star endorsement</italic></sub> = 5.668, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.453) than celebrity endorsement (M<sub><italic>celebrity endorsement</italic></sub> = 4.440, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.498) and no endorsement (M<sub><italic>control</italic></sub> = 3.617, <italic>SD</italic> = 0.705) (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). In other words, symbolic appeal is more closely matched with celebrity endorsements as a driver of consumers&#x2019; purchase intention, while functional appeal is more closely matched with online star endorsements, thus supporting Hypotheses 5 and 6.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Effects of endorsement types and advertising appeals on purchase intention.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpsyg-12-736883-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="S3.SS7.SSS3">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Following the first three studies, we introduced advertising appeal as a moderating variable in Study 4. Our results revealed that the mechanism underlying the influences of different types of endorsement on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention differs for advertisements involving symbolic appeal vs. functional appeal.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>General Discussion</title>
<p>Research on celebrity endorsement generally suggest that popularity, expertise and trustworthiness increase consumers&#x2019; purchase intention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Carroll and Ahuvia, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Wang and Scheinbaum, 2018</xref>). However, few studies have focused on the effects of celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements on purchase intention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Jin and Ryu, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Schouten et al., 2020</xref>). We hypothesized that self-concept and advertisement appeal play significant roles in shaping consumers&#x2019; purchase intention. Across four studies, we confirmed the following: (1) Both celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements increase consumer purchase intention, in ways that are not significantly different. Similar to traditional celebrities, online stars also attract and convince consumers using their popularity, trustworthiness and expertise (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Zamudio, 2016</xref>). Furthermore, online stars interact more frequently with consumers and are therefore considered more like friends, enhancing consumers&#x2019; reliance on and trust in online star endorsements and drives purchase intention. (2) Self-concept plays a mediating role in this process. Consumers whose ideal self-concept is activated by celebrities are more willing to buy products endorsed by celebrities, who are perceived to be socially distant. However, consumers whose actual self-concept is activated by online stars are more likely to purchase products endorsed by them. (3) Matching between different advertising appeals and endorsement types relates to the effects of endorsements on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention. When ideal self is activated, consumers seek a product reward related to personality or identity-expression. As a symbolic appeal in an advertisement conveys social status and meaning of the product, consumers&#x2019; willingness to buy increases when this appeal is matched with a celebrity endorsement. Similarly, consumers&#x2019; purchase intention is higher when a functional appeal is matched with online star endorsements because consumers seek instrumental and utilitarian product rewards once their actual self has been activated.</p>
<sec id="S4.SS1">
<title>Theoretical Contributions</title>
<p>The current research is among the first to precisely define the concept of online stars and differentiate it from the concept of celebrities in a traditional sense. As most prior studies focus on the effects of celebrity endorsements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Atkin and Block, 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Biswas et al., 2006</xref>), the influence of online star endorsements is rather understudied due to limited differentiation between the two groups. Though online stars are distinct from celebrities in the sense that they are socially much closer to consumers, our research suggests that celebrity and online star endorsements are not significantly different in their ability to increase consumers&#x2019; purchase intention. Seemingly incongruent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Schouten et al. (2020)</xref>&#x2019;s findings, where significant difference in trustworthiness was found between online stars and celebrities, our study shows that both groups influence purchase intention likewise, as we understand online stars as similarly trustworthy to traditional celebrities since they are both famous to the public.</p>
<p>A second contribution is the importance of exploring the mechanism underlying the effects of online star endorsements and celebrity endorsements. Based on the theories of self and construal level theory, our results show that self-concept mediates the influence of online star endorsements and celebrity endorsements on purchase intention. While extant literature on endorsement effects seem rather confined to investigating the expertise, popularity, trustworthiness, and attractiveness of the endorsers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Park and Lin, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Schouten et al., 2020</xref>), our research provides a new perspective by examining consumers&#x2019; self-concept in different endorsing situations, supplementing the literature on self-concept and consumer purchase intention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Oumlil and Erdem, 1997</xref>).</p>
<p>Third, instead of considering emotional/rational appeal as boundary conditions like previous endorsement studies did (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Ruiz and Sicilia, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Andreu et al., 2015</xref>), we have found a better moderator using symbolic/functional appeal when investigating celebrity/online star endorsements effects. By examining the moderating effect of advertising appeals, we have gained a better understanding of the situations wherein celebrity endorsements and online star endorsements increase purchase intention.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS2">
<title>Practical Implications</title>
<p>Our research has important practical implications for advertising and product marketing researches. When considering endorsers, managers may select both celebrities and online stars in accordance with current marketing practice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Milkman et al., 2010</xref>), as they influence purchase intention in a similarly significant way. For example, Mercedes-Benz selected traditional celebrities and a popular streamer to endorse its products.</p>
<p>Second, our results also suggest managers consider the significance of appropriately matching the advertising appeal with the endorser type. Specifically, companies may adopt symbolic appeal when a celebrity endorses their product, reinforcing consumers&#x2019; ideal self and promoting purchase intention. Similarly, using functional appeal to match online star endorsers, companies activate consumers&#x2019; actual self and drive them to buy.</p>
<p>Third, enterprises should consider promoting purchase intention by activating consumer self-concept, which is dynamic and malleable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Freitas et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Hong and Zinkhan, 2010</xref>). Different activation of consumers&#x2019; self-concept increases their willingness to buy products endorsed by either celebrities or online stars to maintain a congruent self. Therefore, celebrity-endorsed products might describe themselves for benefits, such as personal charisma or perfect image in public places, to activate the ideal self. Likewise, companies using online star endorsements to activate the actual self, might encourage consumers to purchase by providing information on product core functions to meet their diverse needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS3">
<title>Limitations and Future Research</title>
<p>This research also has some limitations. First, research on online stars remains at a nascent stage. Although we included celebrities and online stars of both sexes in our studies, we failed to include online stars of an older age because most of them are between 18 and 35. Future research might examine the influence of celebrity endorsers and online star endorsers of different ages on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention as the pool of online stars expands. Second, this research only validates the interaction of advertising appeals with endorsement types. Future research could examine other possible moderating variables, such as consumer cultural factors, consumer involvement, communication channels and consumption contexts. Third, this research only measures the independent effects of celebrity or online star endorsers. Future studies could investigate the influence of using a combination of celebrity and online star endorsements on consumers&#x2019; purchase intention.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="S5">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6">
<title>Ethics Statement</title>
<p>All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the School of Economics and Management, Xinan University, China. The participants gave written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>PS was involved in the whole process of the research. XL, CS, LW, and BG contributed to conduct the experiments and perform the statistical analysis. PS, XL, and YZ wrote, revised, read the manuscript, and reviewed and coordinated the final article as a whole. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s12">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was funded by the Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education (No. 20XJC790006) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. SWU1909798).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>We would like to thank all the members of our team who has spent lots of time on this study, and we also thank Y. Z.&#x2019;s team for the careful modification of the grammar of the manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="S10" sec-type="supplementary material"><title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736883/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736883/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.pdf" id="DS1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abidin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Buymylife.com: Cyber-femininities and commercial intimacy in blogshops.</article-title> <source><italic>Wom. Stud. Int. Forum</italic></source> <volume>35</volume> <fpage>467</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>477</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wsif.2012.10.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahn</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ekinci</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Self-congruence, functional congruence, and destination choice.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Busin. Res.</italic></source> <volume>66</volume> <fpage>719</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>723</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andreu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casado-D&#x00ED;az</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mattila</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of message appeal and service type in csr communication strategies.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Busin. Res.</italic></source> <volume>68</volume> <fpage>1488</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1495</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.039</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashley</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tuten</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Creative strategies in social media marketing: An exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement.</article-title> <source><italic>Psychol. Market</italic>.</source> <volume>32</volume> <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mar.20761</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Atkin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Block</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Effectiveness of celebrity endorsers.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Advertis. Res.</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00704.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ayeh</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Travellers&#x2019; acceptance of consumer-generated media: An integrated model of technology acceptance and source credibility theories.</article-title> <source><italic>Comput. Hum. Behav.</italic></source> <volume>48</volume> <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.049</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhat</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reddy</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Symbolic and functional positioning of brands.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Consu. Market.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>32</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/07363769810202664</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Biswas</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Biswas</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The differential effects of celebrity and expert endorsements on consumer risk perceptions: The role of consumer knowledge, perceived congruency, and product technology orientation.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Advertis.</italic></source> <volume>35</volume> <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00913367.2006.10639231</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burke</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hatfield</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mullet</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Accumulation of heat shock proteins in field-grown cotton.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol</italic>.</source> <volume>78</volume> <fpage>394</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>398</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.78.2.394</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16664252</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carroll</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahuvia</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love.</article-title> <source><italic>Market. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>89</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11002-006-4219-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Cultural masculinity/femininity influences on advertising appeals.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Advertis. Res.</italic></source> <volume>46</volume> <fpage>315</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>323</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2501/S0021849906060296</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoon</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paek</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>&#x2018;Thinking and feeling&#x2019; products and &#x2018;utilitarian and value-expressive&#x2019; appeals in contemporary TV advertising: a content analytic test of functional matching and the fcb model.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Market. Commun.</italic></source> <volume>18</volume> <fpage>91</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13527266.2010.484581</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rifon</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Who is the celebrity in advertising? Understanding dimensions of celebrity images.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Popu. Cult.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>304</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>324</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1540-5931.2007.00380.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clarke</surname> <given-names>T. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adler</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Celebrity chef adoption and implementation of social media, particularly pinterest: A diffusion of innovations approach.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Hospital. Manage.</italic></source> <volume>57</volume> <fpage>84</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.06.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aronson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steele</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>When beliefs yield to evidence: Reducing biased evaluation by affirming the self.</article-title> <source><italic>Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull.</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>1151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1164</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The effect of morality reputatidn on evaluations to celebrity endorser and endorsfment.</article-title> <source><italic>Acta. Psychol. Sin.</italic></source> <volume>37</volume> <fpage>382</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>389</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dodds</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Monroe</surname> <given-names>K. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grewal</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers, product evaluations.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Market. Res</italic>.</source> <volume>28</volume> <fpage>307</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>319</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/002224379102800305</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Driessens</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Celebrity capital: Redefining celebrity using field theory.</article-title> <source><italic>Theo. Soc.</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>543</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>560</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elmira</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oxana</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>&#x2018;Instafamous&#x2019;&#x2013;credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media.</article-title> <source><italic>Inform. Commun. Soc.</italic></source> <volume>29</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1369118X.2018.1438491</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Erdogan</surname> <given-names>B. Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Celebrity endorsement: A literature review.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Market. Manage.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>291</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>314</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1362/026725799784870379</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Erdogan</surname> <given-names>B. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Towards a practitioner-based model of selecting celebrity endorsers.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Advertis.</italic></source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02650487.2000.11104782</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Freitas</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Langsam</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moeller</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Seeing oneself in one&#x2019;s choices: construal level and self-pertinence of electoral and consumer decisions.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exper. Soc. Psychol.</italic></source> <volume>44</volume> <fpage>1174</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1179</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gauzente</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Message content in keyword campaigns, click behavior, and price-consciousness: A study of millennial consumers.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Retail. Consu. Serv</italic>.</source> <volume>19</volume> <fpage>78</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.09.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Engaging fans on microblog: The synthetic influence of parasocial interaction and source characteristics on celebrity endorsement.</article-title> <source><italic>Psychol. Market.</italic></source> <volume>34</volume> <fpage>720</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>732</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mar.21018</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Graeff</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Consumption situations and the effects of brand image on consumers&#x2019; brand evaluations.</article-title> <source><italic>Psychol.Market.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume> <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199701)14:13.0.CO;2-O</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hess</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Measuring distance in personal relationships: The relational distance index.</article-title> <source><italic>Perso. Relations</italic></source> <volume>10</volume> <fpage>197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>216</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1475-6811.00046</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zinkhan</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Self-concept and advertising effectiveness: The influence of congruency, conspicuousness, and response mode.</article-title> <source><italic>Psychol. Market.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mar.4220120105</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>S. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryu</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>&#x201C;I&#x2019;ll buy what she&#x2019;s wearing&#x201D;: The roles of envy toward and parasocial interaction with influencers in Instagram celebrity-based brand endorsement and social commerce.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Retail. Consu. Serv.</italic></source> <volume>55</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102121</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johar</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sirgy</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Advertis.</italic></source> <volume>20</volume> <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00913367.1991.10673345</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Joseph</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Consu. Res.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume> <fpage>287</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>300</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/208924</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kerr</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schultz</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kitchen</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mulhern</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beede</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Does traditional advertising theory apply to the digital world? A replication analysis questions the relevance of the elaboration likelihood model.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Advertis. Res.</italic></source> <volume>55</volume> <fpage>390</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>400</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2501/JAR-2015-001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kettle</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>H&#x00E4;ubl</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The signature effect: Signing influences consumption-related behavior by priming self-identity.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Consu. Res.</italic></source> <volume>38</volume> <fpage>474</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>474</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/659753</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khamis</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Welling</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Self-branding, &#x201C;micro-celebrity&#x201D; and the rise of Social Media Influencers.</article-title> <source><italic>Celebr. Stud.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>191</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>208</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/19392397.2016.1218292</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kivetz</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tyler</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Tomorrow I&#x2019;ll be me: the effect of time perspective on the activation of idealistic versus pragmatic selves.</article-title> <source><italic>Organiz. Behav. HuM. Decis. Proces.</italic></source> <volume>102</volume> <fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Knoll</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matthes</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: A meta-analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Acad. Market. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>60</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11747-016-0503-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krishna</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Consu. Psychol.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>332</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>351</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/shsconf/20173300022</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kunkel</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hodge</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The influence of advertising appeals on consumer perceptions of athlete endorser brand image.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. Spo. Manage. Q.</italic></source> <volume>30</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/16184742.2018.1530688</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lantos</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <source><italic>Consumer behavior in action: Real-life applications for marketing managers.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Milton Park</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Routledge Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>L&#x0103;z&#x0103;roiu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neguri&#x0163;&#x0103;</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grecu</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grecu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitran</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Consumers&#x2019; decision-making process on social commerce platforms: Online trust, perceived risk, and purchase intentions.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Psychol.</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>:<issue>890</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00890</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32499740</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levordashka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Utz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Ambient awareness: From random noise to digital closeness in online social networks.</article-title> <source><italic>Comput. Hum. Behav.</italic></source> <volume>60</volume> <fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.037</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27375343</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Detecting and tagging users&#x2019; social circles in social media.</article-title> <source><italic>Multime. Syst.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00530-014-0435-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Core versus peripheral innovations: The effect of innovation locus on consumer adoption of new products.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Market. Res.</italic></source> <volume>52</volume> <fpage>309</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>324</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1509/jmr.13.0337</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11670861</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Milkman</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rogers</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bazerman</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>I&#x2019;ll have the ice cream soon and the vegetables later: A study of online grocery purchases and order lead time.</article-title> <source><italic>Market. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10696679.1997.11501746</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ohanian</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>The impact of celebrity spokesperson&#x2019;s perceived image on consumers&#x2019; intention to purchase.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Advertis. Res.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oumlil</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erdem</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Self-concept by gender: A focus on male-female consumer.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Market. Theo. Pract.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10696679.1997.11501746</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The effects of match-ups on the consumer attitudes toward internet celebrities and their live streaming contents in the context of product endorsement.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Retail. Consu. Servi</italic>.</source> <volume>52</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101934</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Influencer-brand fit and brand dilution in china&#x2019;s luxury market: The moderating role of self-concept clarity.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Busin. Manage.</italic></source> <volume>1</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rogers</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bazerman</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Future lock-in: Future implementation increases selection of &#x201C;should&#x201D; choices.</article-title> <source><italic>Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decis. Proces.</italic></source> <volume>106</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.08.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rs</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alawadhi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of celebirity endorsement on consumers purchase intention in the mediation effect of brand image.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Busin. Res.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>454</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>468</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20491/isarder.2020.855</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ruiz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sicilia</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>The impact of cognitive and/or affective processing styles on consumer response to advertising appeals.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Busin. Res.</italic></source> <volume>57</volume> <fpage>657</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>664</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00309-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Russell</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rasolofoarison</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Uncovering the power of natural endorsements: A comparison with celebrity-endorsed advertising and product placements.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Advertis.</italic></source> <volume>36</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02650487.2017.1348033</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schouten</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janssen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verspaget</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Celebrity vs. Influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and Product-Endorser fit.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Advertis</italic>.</source> <volume>39</volume> <fpage>258</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>281</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sengupta</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goodstein</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boninger</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>All cues are not created equal: Obtaining attitude persistence under low-involvement conditions.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Consu.Res.</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>361</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/209488</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shavitt</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Evidence for predicting the effectiveness of value-expressive versus utilitarian appeals: A reply to Johar and Sirgy.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Advertis</italic>.</source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00913367.1992.10673367</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sirgy</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Consu. Res.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume> <fpage>287</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>300</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stephan</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liberman</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trope</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The effects of time perspective and level of construal on social distance.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exper. Soc. Psychol.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>397</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>402</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.001</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21836728</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stever</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lawson</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Twitter as a way for celebrities to communicate with fans: Implications for the study of parasocial interaction.</article-title> <source><italic>Nor. Am. J. Psychol</italic>.</source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>354</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reynolds</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of brand personality dimensions on consumers, perceived self-image congruity and functional congruity with hotel brands.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Hospital. Manage</italic>.</source> <volume>66</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tiggemann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Slater</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Netgirls: The internet, facebook, and body image concern in adolescent girls.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Eat. Disord.</italic></source> <volume>46</volume> <fpage>630</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>633</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/eat.22141</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23712456</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <source><italic>Understanding Celebrity.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Sage Publications</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vazifehdoust</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Najafi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Najafi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Behboudi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Using rational and emotional appeals in online advertisements for muslim customers.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Isla. Market.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>124</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/JIMA-07-2012-0039</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Verwijmeren</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karremans</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stroebe</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wigboldus</surname> <given-names>D. H. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The workings and limits of subliminal advertising: The role of habits.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Consu. Psychol</italic>.</source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>206</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>213</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jcps.2010.11.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vrontis</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Makrides</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Christofi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thrassou</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Social media influencer marketing: A systematic review, integrative framework and future research agenda.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Consum. Stud.</italic></source> <volume>45</volume> <fpage>617</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>644</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ijcs.12647</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bristol</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mowen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chakraborty</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Alternative modes of self-construal: Dimensions of connectedness-separateness and advertising appeals to the cultural and gender-specific self.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Consu. Psychol.</italic></source> <volume>9</volume> <fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>115</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1207/S15327663JCP0902_5</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33486653</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scheinbaum</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Enhancing brand credibility via celebrity endorsement: Trustworthiness trumps attractiveness and expertise.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Advertis. Res.</italic></source> <volume>58</volume> <fpage>16</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2501/JAR-2017-042</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wolter</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brach</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cronin</surname> <given-names>J. J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Symbolic drivers of consumer&#x2013;brand identification and disidentification.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Busin. Resea.</italic></source> <volume>69</volume> <fpage>785</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>793</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>N. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burkhalter</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Tweet this, not that: A comparison between brand promotions in microblogging environments using celebrity and company-generated tweets.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Market. Communicat.</italic></source> <volume>20</volume> <fpage>129</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>146</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13527266.2013.797784</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zamudio</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Matching with the stars: How brand personality determines celebrity endorsement contract formation.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Res. Market.</italic></source> <volume>33</volume> <fpage>409</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>427</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.07.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A Study on the short videos that continue to affect the popularity factors of the Chinese Internet Celebrity-Papi Jiang.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Asia. Stu.</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>65</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>88</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21740/jas.2020.02.23.1.65</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Social communication and sentiment analysis of Web Celebrities: A case study of web popular milk tea brand HEYTEA.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Busin. Econom</italic>.</source> <volume>38</volume> <fpage>70</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1336/f.2018.04.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list></back>
</article>