AUTHOR=Skorinko Jeanine Lee McHugh , John Melissa-Sue , Doyle Aidan , Carvajal Erker Natalia , Figueroa Matthew , Harnois Jeffrey , Gately Grace , Spear Sarah , Marotta Satia , McKenna Casey , Rossi Lisa , Heather Kenedi , Jaskoviak Tyler , Vega Daniel , Vimal Avik , Kobeissi Mariam , Selkow Maia , Rondina Katherine , Ho Karen , Iannacchione Alisionna , Sanchez Marisol , Heyer Keely , Pittelli Catherine , Bendremer Emily TITLE=You and me versus the rest of the world: the effects of affiliative motivation and ingroup partner status on social tuning JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychology VOLUME=Volume 14 - 2023 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1060166 DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1060166 ISSN=1664-1078 ABSTRACT=

Bandura argues that individuals are more likely to engage in social learning when they identify with a social model and when they are motivated or rewarded. Therefore, in the present work, we investigate how these two key factors, perceived similarity and affiliative motivation, influence the extent to which individuals engage in social tuning or align their views with an interaction partner—especially if their partner’s attitudes differ from the larger social group. Experiment 1 (170 participants) explored the role of perceived similarity through group membership when needing to work collaboratively with a collaboration partner whose climate change beliefs differed from a larger social group. Experiment 2 (115 participants) directly manipulated affiliative motivation (i.e., length of interaction time) along with perceived similarity (i.e., Greek Life membership) to explore if these factors influenced social tuning of drinking attitudes and behaviors. Experiments 3 (69 participants) and 4 (93 participants) replicated Experiment 2 and examined whether tuning occurred for explicit and implicit attitudes towards weight (negative views Experiment 3 and positive views Experiment 4). Results indicate that when individuals experience high affiliative motivation, they are more likely to engage in social tuning of explicit and implicit attitudes when their interaction partner belongs to their ingroup rather than their outgroup. These findings are consistent with the tenets of Social Learning Theory, Shared Reality Theory, and the affiliative social tuning hypothesis.