AUTHOR=Stahelski Anthony , Radeke Mary Katherine , Reavis Maxie 

TITLE=Social perception inferences of computer-generated faces: an Asian Indian and United States cultural comparison

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychology

VOLUME=Volume 14 - 2023

YEAR=2023

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174662

DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174662

ISSN=1664-1078

ABSTRACT=Results from research with computer-generated faces has demonstrated that participants are able to make different trait inferences to different generated faces. However only a few studies using computer-generated faces with crosscultural samples have been done. This study compared the facial trait inference results from India and the United States, using three validated neutral expression computer-generated faces from the University of Chicago Perception and Judgement Lab database as facial stimuli. The three faces varied in perceived threat. Participants were asked about the attractiveness, pleasing-ness (to look at), honesty, and potential threat in each of the three faces. Results indicated that participants from both cultural samples made the same inferences to the three faces; participants rated the attractiveness, pleasing-ness, and honesty highest in the low threat face and lowest in the high threat face. Indian participants perceive the high threat face to be less threatening than the US participants. Participants were also asked about the emotional expression on each of the faces, even though the faces were presumably neutral. United States participants were significantly more likely to indicate that the faces in all three threat conditions were emotionally neutral, compared to Indian participants, reflecting a cultural In-group bias, in which members of a culture are more accurately able to identify expressions on faces from their own culture.Computer-generated faces are increasingly used in facial inference studies to enhance participant focus solely on facial structure features. This study expands the use of computer-generated faces by comparing Indian and American participant reactions to a set of computer-generated faces. Results indicated that participants from the two cultures made both similar and dissimilar inferences to the presented faces.No animal studies are presented in this manuscript.