The complex interplay between personality and sport has captivated the attention of researchers, coaches, and athletes for decades. Central to this discourse are two conflicting perspectives: the skeptical view, which argues that personality has a minimal effect on athletic ability, and the gullible perspective, which asserts a substantial influence of personality traits on sports performance. Recent studies, however, have introduced more nuanced theories, aiming to capture the multifaceted nature of this relationship. A comprehensive meta-analysis by Sutin et al. (2016) stands as a testament to this, offering compelling evidence regarding the association between personality and physical activity patterns. The study revealed that individuals with higher neuroticism levels were inclined toward inactivity, while those possessing elevated levels of extraversion, openness, and conscientiousness displayed reduced inactivity. These correlations remained significant, even when considering the shared variance between these traits. Remarkably, factors like age and sex did not alter these relationships, emphasizing the significant role of inherent tendencies in determining one’s engagement in physical activity. From the skeptical viewpoint, Davis, when assessing the personality traits of elite hockey players, found no correlation with their performance levels (Davis, 1991). In contrast, a large volume of literature spanning thousands of articles highlights the significance of personality within sports. Yet, it’s crucial to note that many of these studies employ different personality theories and testing methods, adding complexity to the interpretation of findings. For instance, an analysis of 42 British athletic groups’ mean scores on Cattell’s 16-PF questionnaire shed light on how personality traits might impact athletic performance. Interestingly, while top athletes showed lower anxiety levels than their less skilled peers, their anxiety was still above the population average, challenging the common notion that sports personalities are stable extraverts (Knapp, 1974). A crucial factor that differentiates one person from another is their unique personality (Karageorghis et al., 2021).

Indeed, while personality differences between individuals might appear subtle, their implications can be profound. Personality, as defined by Burger (2011), refers to consistent patterns of behavior and internal processes stemming from the individual. Historical work by E. W. Scripture at Yale University underscores the potential for cultivating certain personality traits through sports (Franz, 1898), emphasizing that sports success is, to a considerable extent, influenced by personality (Allen et al., 2013). Notably, Hartung and Farge’s assessment of middle-aged male runners revealed these athletes scored higher than the general populace in areas like intelligence, imagination, and self-sufficiency, among others (Hartung and Farge, 1977). Meanwhile, Cui Guofu’s research on elite Chinese race walkers found that introverted athletes outperformed extroverted ones, particularly among male participants (Cui, 1989).

In the sports domain, a longstanding question remains: is an athlete’s behavior primarily determined by the situation they find themselves in, or by their inherent personality? One intriguing study explored whether personality differences attracted individuals to sports, termed the “gravity hypothesis,” or if participation in sports molded an individual’s personality, the “developmental hypothesis.” Early findings suggested that team sport participants consistently scored higher on extroverted sport scales compared to individual sport participants and non-participants, thereby lending credence to the gravity hypothesis (Eagleton et al., 2007). Another significant theory to consider is the “performance hypothesis” posited by García-Naveira and Ruiz-Barquín (2013) (see also García-Naveira and Ruiz-Barquín, 2016; Garcia-Naveira and Ruiz-Barquín, 2020). This hypothesis emphasizes that certain personality traits are intrinsically linked with enhanced sports performance. It posits that these traits, to a certain degree, assimilate into the high-performance sports context, implying that athletes with these traits might naturally align better with the demands and rigors of elite sports competition. Instead of adhering to fixed notions of personality types, such as the Myers–Briggs typology, theories of person–environment fit (PEFT) advocate for a dimensional approach. This perspective views personality traits as influenced by and reflective of specific environments (Levy and Ruggieri, 2019).

Yet, the discussion extends beyond simply determining if personality affects sports participation and performance. It’s essential to highlight, as pointed out by multiple authors, including García Naveira (2010), García-Naveira et al. (2011), García-Naveira and Ruiz-Barquín (2016), and Piedmont et al. (1999), that personality’s influence is twofold. On one hand, it can directly affect the sporting action itself, and on the other, it can exert an indirect influence on the surrounding context and actions intimately tied to an individual’s sports performance. It’s crucial to discern the nature of this influence. Distinguishing between the direct and indirect effects of personality on sports behavior introduces additional complexity. A direct effect implies that personality traits linearly impact athletic performance. Conversely, an indirect effect suggests that personality traits shape other variables—like motivation or resilience—which subsequently affect sports outcomes. Allen et al. (2013) delved into this, investigating how personality shaped organized sports, its implications for athletic achievement, individual differences, and team dynamics. Their findings highlighted the interplay of both genetic and environmental factors, providing pivotal insights for applied sports psychology. Further exploring this theme, Allen and Laborde (2014) emphasized the predictive power of personality traits for both sports performance and broader physical activity. Their work uncovered connections between personality traits and various determinants, including the psychological state of athletes, harmful exercise behaviors, and even factors like strength and flexibility in older populations. Roberts and Woodman (2017) expanded the scope, focusing on the role of traits like narcissism and alexithymia in sports performance. Their call for an interactionist perspective underscores the intricate dance between personality and performance. Finally, a landmark study by Laborde et al. (2019) embarked on a sweeping overview of trait-based research in sports and exercise psychology. Analyzing a vast array of abstracts, they identified 64 unique traits clustered into 15 overarching themes, with traits like anxiety, self-efficacy, and perfectionism emerging as recurrent focal points. Their rigorous analysis linked many of these traits to the Big Five personality dimensions, although not all associations were straightforward.

Though many studies have explored the impact of personality in sports, it’s important to understand the diverse developmental trajectories of personality theory. Schools of personality development, such as psychoanalysis, behaviorism, social learning, cognitive theory, and humanistic theory, aim to elucidate how personality emerges and evolves over a lifetime (Cloninger, 2009). A vast body of literature, comprising thousands of articles, has examined the sports personality domain (Ruffer, 1976), with numerous investigations underscoring the significance of personality within the realm of sports. Each researcher used a different personality theory and test method, making the results difficult to analyze.

A prominent approach within psychological research, the trait or dispositional theory, seeks to quantify enduring patterns of behavior, cognition, and emotion termed as “traits” (Kassin, 2003). Rooted in this approach, the Big Five Personality Model emerged as a pivotal framework. Historically, by analyzing personality-related terms from dictionaries in the late 1920s, psychologists discovered the inherent structure of personality traits within our language. Factor analyses distilled these traits into five core factors: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to new experiences (Babcock and Wilson, 2020). The consistent appearance of these factors across studies led to the refinement of the Big Five Model (Goldberg, 1981).

According to this model, the terrain of human personality is primarily constituted by five central traits (Vealey, 2002; Allen et al., 2013; Gill et al., 2017):Neuroticism, defined by anxiety and tension vs. emotional stability. Extraversion, characterized by sociability and enthusiasm opposed to introversion. Openness, signified by adaptability and curiosity. Agreeableness, encompassing kindness and cooperativeness. Conscientiousness, marked by discipline and organization. This model posits that individual personalities are composed of varying degrees of these traits, with specific behaviors emerging as a result (McCrae and John, 1992). For instance, while conscientious individuals gravitate toward organization, neurotic individuals might be more self-conscious. The Big Five offers invaluable insights into personality differences, emphasizing the importance of individualized training approaches in sports (Rhodes et al., 2002).

Currently, sports psychologists are fervently exploring the Big Five traits (Lochbaum et al., 2010; Singley et al., 2012; Merritt and Tharp, 2013). Furthermore, they are examining additional traits like tolerance (Sheard and Golby, 2010) and their associations with athletes’ mental states and behaviors. Numerous studies have unveiled significant correlations between these traits, such as neuroticism and self-consciousness, and athletic performance (Piedmont et al., 1999; Wann et al., 2004). Allen et al. (2013) deduced from an extensive review that personality traits correlate with long-term athletic success. Their findings revealed that sports participants typically display greater extraversion than non-athletes. Moreover, team athletes in high-risk sports showed increased extraversion and reduced conscientiousness compared to those in lower-risk individual sports. As evidenced by Rhodes and Smith (2006), extraversion and conscientiousness positively influence physical activity, while neuroticism can serve as a deterrent.

The interaction between personality and sports performance, while multifaceted, undeniably influences the trajectory of sports success. From questioning the centrality of personality in determining athletic performance to drawing insights from the Big Five personality model, opinions vary, but there is a consensus that individual personality traits have a critical impact on athletic outcomes. In the pursuit of a comprehensive review, the objective is to address an evident lacuna in the extant literature. While there are five preceding reviews, the most recent one dating to 2019, a systematic exploration of the subject matter remains absent. Given the burgeoning research in this domain, a current and rigorous review is both relevant and imperative. By focusing on the Big Five personality traits, this review aims to utilize a standardized methodology to systematically assess their influence on sports performance. It is hypothesized that the Big Five traits significantly impact athletic performance, and the findings of this review will amalgamate the prevailing understanding of this association. Furthermore, this investigation will offer recommendations for future research, encompassing a variety of sports disciplines for comparative evaluation.

The review was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline (Page et al., 2021). Methods for conducting this review were pre-specified in a registered protocol on PROSPERO (CRD42022364000).

Table 1 displays the particulars of the selected studies. Cross-sectional studies (references) adhered to the review criteria. All included studies received ethical approval from their respective institutions. According to the table, studies have examined how personality traits relate to athletic performance using the Five Factor Model (FFM). It provides information on the authors and year of publication, sample size (N) and demographics, type of sport, athlete level, personality measurement tools, sports performance metrics, and other variables assessed in each study. The studies encompass a diverse range of sports, such as swimming, rock climbing, basketball, soccer, canoeing, boxing, fast walking, computer-based soccer games, motor performance, rowing, and martial arts. Various instruments have been employed to measure the FFM, including the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R), the Big Five Inventory-2 Short Form (BFI-2-S), and the IBM Watson Personality Insights Service. Additionally, the studies utilize different approaches to assess sports performance, such as race wins, competition rankings, and specific performance tests. Some of the investigations also examine other psychological variables, like grit, coping strategies, and subjective well-being.

Among the 23 studies incorporated in the analysis, the earliest publication dates back to 1999 (Piedmont et al., 1999), while the remaining studies were published between 2011 and 2022, with a peak of five articles in 2021 (Fabbricatore et al., 2021; Klatt et al., 2021), three of which were authored by Piepiora (Piepiora et al., 2021; Piepiora and Piepiora, 2021; Piepiora, 2021a). The included research encompasses four studies in Chinese and the rest in English. The investigations span an array of sporting disciplines, comprising individual and team events, fundamental physical fitness assessments, and innovative e-sports. Soccer research features prominently, with four articles dedicated to the subject. The studies encompass a broad age range, from 12 to 96 years, and extend beyond professional athletes to include the general population and individuals with disabilities. In many studies, personality characteristics have a certain impact on the performance of athletes in various sports. Characteristics such as openness, agreeableness, neuroticism, extraversion, and conscientiousness affect the performance of rock climbing, football, canoeing, boxing, and other sports to varying degrees. Moreover, an athlete’s personality traits can influence their emotional and physiological state leading up to a competition, which correlates with psychological aspects like anxiety and self-confidence. The well-being of athletes is related to their personality, and personality characteristics are also different among athletes of different ages. Generally speaking, personality characteristics have a certain reference value in the selection, training, and psychological adjustment of athletes.

Table 2 summarizes the key findings from the 23 reviewed articles, highlighting the outcomes related to the five unique personality traits: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism, as observed across these studies. Though personality traits may not have a direct impact on swimming performance, they can indirectly influence it through mental skills (Fabbricatore et al., 2021). Openness and agreeableness have been linked with climbing performance (Ionel et al., 2022), while neuroticism and conscientiousness are associated with performance in female soccer players (Piedmont et al., 1999). Furthermore, personality traits have been demonstrated to predict the performance of elite Chinese rowers (Lin et al., 2011) and the subjective well-being of Chinese athletes in esthetically demanding and combat sports, with average ages of 14 and 18 years, respectively (Liu, 2011). The five-factor model of personality can distinguish varying levels of sports involvement and pinpoint the coping techniques adopted by athletes (Allen et al., 2011). In the elderly, there’s a notable link between personality traits (like neuroticism, extraversion, openness, and conscientiousness) and energy consumption. This suggests potential impacts on health aspects like weight management and lifespan (Terracciano et al., 2013). Neuroticism has been identified as crucial for comprehending athletes’ emotional and physiological states before competition due to its association with anxiety, arousal, and self-confidence (Balyan et al., 2016). Furthermore, personality attributes have been linked to performance outcomes in diverse sports, rowing being one of them (Stine et al., 2019), Chang Quan, Nan Quan, Taijiquan (Yuan, 2020), and young male soccer players (Kalinowski et al., 2020). In eSports, notable variances in traits like extraversion, agreeableness, and openness were detected between players at lower ranks and those at the higher tiers of the Legendary League (LoL) (Matuszewski et al., 2020). Sports champions typically exhibit lower neuroticism and higher scores in the other five dimensions, suggesting that neuroticism is a determining factor in the level of achievement.

In summary, this comprehensive review of 23 studies emphasizes the importance of accounting for personality traits in the recruitment and training of athletes, as these traits can influence problem-solving skills in sports and result in performance disparities.

Table 3 displays an evaluation of the methodological integrity and potential bias present in the studies that were reviewed. By using the quality assessment of the 22 items in the STROBE statement, most of the analyses used technical terms in the title or abstract to describe the design of their studies (82.6%; k = 19). All studies presented the background of the survey, participant inclusion criteria, data sources, and evaluation methods for each study variable, and reported the results of the survey (100%, k = 23). Almost all surveys presented key elements of design (95.6%; k = 22) and outcomes that defined all predictors and potential factors (91.3%; k = 21) in the outcomes. Eighty-three percent (k = 19) of the studies listed clear goals and made prior assumptions. Eighty-seven percent (k = 20) of the studies referenced pre-listed objectives and summarized key results. 78.2% (k = 18) of the surveys described the setting of the study, location, and date, including recruitment, contact, follow-up, and time period for data collection, and gave information on participant characteristics (e.g., demographic, clinical, and sociological) and exposure and potential confounders. In addition, subgroup and interaction analyses and sensitivity analyses were reported in 73.9% (k = 17) of the findings. The results of 69.5% (k = 16) of the studies took objectives, limitations, diversity of analyses, results of similar studies, and other relevant evidence into account. 65.2% (k = 15) of the study data gave an unadjusted estimate, giving a confounder-adjusted estimate and its precision (e.g., 95% confidence interval). 60.8% (k = 14) of the studies described the statistical methods used, the number of individuals at each stage, and discussed the limitations of the study at the end of the results, taking into account potential sources of bias or imprecision. More than half of the studies explained how quantitative variables were treated in the analysis (56.5%; k = 13). Only 30% of the studies discussed the generalizability of the findings (k = 7). How the sample size was derived was explained in only 21.7% (k = 5) of the results. Only four studies (17.3%) described methods to address bias in the study and received funding.

This retrospective analysis provides the most comprehensive statistical review to date of the relationship between personality and athletic performance and confirms that the Big Five personalities are associated with athletic performance. It is clear that the Big Five personality model can provide a practical level of statistical prediction for socially important sports performance standards. Athlete personality traits can be used to predict athletic performance and provide direction for recruiting athletes and preparing for competition. Such as openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, which have been found to predict performance in specific sports (e.g., rock climbing, rowing), neuroticism appears to negatively affect sports performance, and lower levels of neuroticism are associated with higher performance (e.g., soccer, boxing, and martial arts). It is important to note that the personality characteristics of athletes in different sports may vary, highlighting the importance of considering the specific requirements of each sport (e.g., team sports, extreme sports). These findings may vary by sport, level of competition, and other factors such as cultural and social influences. Therefore, future researchers and scholars need further research to better understand the complex relationship between the five-factor model of personality and sports performance in different situations.

Individuals characterized by openness tend to appreciate diversity, pursue novel experiences, and exhibit curiosity and insight regarding their surroundings. These traits align with the characteristics required for rock climbing, which encompass both sport climbers and boulderers. A positive correlation has been observed between openness scores and climbing performance (Ionel et al., 2022). Risk-taking is frequently deemed a crucial subcomponent of openness, resulting in participants in high-risk sports demonstrating significantly elevated levels of extraversion and experiential openness (Tok, 2011). A robust predictive index exists between performance in Nanquan and openness to experience (Yuan, 2020). Similarly, openness is a vital attribute in American football. Consequently, systematic personality testing among athletes is advocated during the selection process for top-tier American football competitions (Piepiora et al., 2021).

A strong correlation exists between conscientiousness and team events. In assessments of football and basketball performance, conscientiousness demonstrates a positive association with sports achievements (Kalinowski et al., 2020; Siemon and Wessels, 2022). In team sports, individual performance substantially influences competition outcomes, indicating that traits such as self-control, diligence, responsibility, and reliability contribute to enhanced performance. In contrast, specific individual exercises, including swimming and aerobic activity, exhibit no relationship with conscientiousness, aligning with earlier research. The incremental validity of researchers’ incapacity to predict endurance athletes’ performance via conscientiousness and motivation has been substantiated (Perry et al., 2017). Notwithstanding that descriptors like “diligence,” “dependability,” and “persistence” encapsulate conscientious traits, and persistence appears essential for endurance sports, the present investigation reveals no association between these elements.

Extroversion, a personality dimension, is typically associated with individuals who exhibit talkativeness, confidence, and affability. In the realm of sports, extroverted athletes are capable of engaging in effective communication with teammates, coaches, and competitors, fostering a conducive atmosphere and enhancing performance. This advantage becomes particularly salient in team sports contexts. For instance, extroverted NBA players exhibit positive correlations with various performance metrics. Basketball athletes displaying pronounced extroversion are more capable of tolerating pain due to the inherent nature of team sports (Siemon and Wessels, 2022). These individuals relish camaraderie, support, and competition while striving toward shared objectives. This notion is substantiated by the mediating effect of extraversion on performance effectiveness in relation to the task-centered approach to stress among football players (Kalinowski et al., 2020). Interestingly, a survey of individual event champions also revealed markedly high extraversion traits (Piepiora, 2021b). This observation aligns with the proclivity of active individuals to exhibit traits such as energetic demeanors, fast-paced lifestyles, confidence, and positive emotions, all of which fall within the domain of extraversion. Moreover, extroversion has been linked to increased aerobic capacity (Terracciano et al., 2013).

Agreeableness, which focuses on qualities like trust, altruism, modesty, compassion, cooperation, and honesty, is distinct from extraversion. Athletes in team sports often score higher in agreeableness compared to those in individual sports. Given its socially-oriented nature, this correlation seems logical (Nia and Besharat, 2010). But studies in beach volleyball, basketball, and American football have not confirmed this result (Klatt et al., 2021; Siemon and Wessels, 2022), in contrast to individual sports such as canoeing. There is a significant relationship between agreeableness and sport performance in rowing, with elite athletes with high agreeableness having better performance (Liu, 2011; Stine et al., 2019).

Among the “Big Five” personality dimensions, neuroticism stands out as the sole attribute with an inherently negative implication. This trait is intrinsically linked to the autonomic nervous system’s excitation levels, with neurotic individuals possessing highly unstable systems characterized by rapid agitation onset and a prolonged return to baseline (Eysenck, 1967). A plethora of research findings demonstrate that athletes exhibiting lower neuroticism levels exhibit superior sports performance, with team sports champions displaying reduced neuroticism relative to their counterparts (Piepiora, 2021a). Additionally, elite athletes exhibit lower neuroticism levels compared to non-elite athletes (Vealey, 1992), and those participating in exercise display lower neuroticism scores than non-exercise participants (McKelvie et al., 2003). Concurrently, certain studies reveal that female athletes generally possess higher neuroticism levels compared to their male counterparts (Allen et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2011), though this observation is contextually specific to Nanquan (Yuan, 2020).

The relationship between personality and performance varies across athlete levels. Studies focusing on high-level athletes, such as those aiming for the NBA, elite canoeists, or national team members, frequently highlight traits like conscientiousness, neuroticism, and agreeableness as predictive of performance outcomes (Liu, 2011; Siemon and Wessels, 2022). Notably, low neuroticism and high conscientiousness often correlate with better performance in these elite settings. This is consistent with the results of a study conducted by Steca et al. (2018), who found that more successful athletes displayed higher levels of agreeableness, conscientiousness, and emotional stability compared to those who were less successful. In non-elite athletes, the Five Factor Model of personality shows a complex relationship with sports performance. Unlike elite counterparts with distinct profiles, these athletes exhibit a wide personality range, where traits like agreeableness can predict climbing prowess (Ionel et al., 2022), while neuroticism might influence outcomes in computer-based soccer (Balyan et al., 2016) and martial arts (Yuan, 2020). It’s imperative, as underscored by García Naveira (2010), Garcia-Naveira and Ruiz-Barquín (2020), and Piedmont et al. (1999), to make a clear distinction between studies. Some research focuses on disparities grounded in the athletes’ competitive tiers, while others delve into the intricate relationships between personality traits and performance metrics.

Other studies have shown a correlation between personality traits and energy expenditure in elderly individuals, and found a significant correlation between neuroticism, extroversion, openness, and conscientiousness with energy expenditure during peak walking speed (Terracciano et al., 2013). But this is contrary to the latest study, Personality traits did not moderate intervention effects on physical functioning (Kekäläinen et al., 2023). It’s evident that the influence of personality on performance can be multifaceted and may vary based on the sport, the competitive tier, and individual factors. When considering differences among sports, athletes in high-risk sports may be characterized by their thrill-seeking nature and openness to experiences. Meanwhile, those in team sports, like soccer, often display more extroversion but may be less emotionally stable compared to individual sport athletes. Furthermore, team sport participants tend to balance personal and group needs, whereas those in individual sports lean more toward individualism (García Naveira, 2010). In essence, the intricate interplay between personality and performance underscores the importance of considering both the individual’s psychological makeup and the unique demands of their chosen sport when evaluating and predicting athletic success.

By compiling and analyzing an extensive array of pertinent literature, this review offers a thorough and insightful examination of the associations between the five personality traits and athletic performance. The investigation encompasses not only the overarching connections between these traits and performance but also delves into the impacts of various sport types, athletic populations, and athletes’ ages on these relationships. The findings hold substantial relevance for sports psychologists, coaches, athletes, and sports administrators, furnishing valuable guidance for selection processes, training, and psychological interventions.

However, the comprehensive nature of the research domains addressed and the diverse characteristics of sports and populations could introduce heterogeneity into the study, potentially affecting the results’ robustness and precision. Additionally, distinct cultural backgrounds may exert differential influences on personality traits and athletic performance, thereby constraining the applicability of the findings across diverse cultural contexts. In summary, while this review sheds light on the interplay between the five personality traits and sports performance, further meticulous and exhaustive research is necessary to surmount existing limitations and furnish more reliable evidence for practitioners.

We suggest the following directions for future research: Utilize longitudinal study designs to establish causal relationships between the Big Five personality traits and athletic performance more effectively. Perform cross-cultural investigations to assess how the connections between personality traits and sports performance might differ in various cultural settings, thereby increasing the applicability of research findings. Examine the relationships between personality traits and athletic performance in specific sports and populations, such as team sports, individual sports, aerobic sports, and among professional, amateur, and youth athletes, offering tailored guidance for practitioners. Evaluate the impact of targeted psychological interventions focusing on personality traits in enhancing sports performance, assisting sports psychologists and coaches in designing effective approaches. Apply advanced statistical methods like structural equation modeling and multilevel analysis to deepen our understanding of the relationships between personality traits and sports performance while accounting for potential interactions and moderating variables. Investigate the interplay between personality traits and other psychological aspects, including motivation, self-efficacy, and emotion regulation, to gain a more comprehensive perspective on the psychological mechanisms driving sports performance. By addressing these suggestions, future research can contribute to a richer understanding of the links between the Big Five personality traits and athletic performance, ultimately providing valuable support for practitioners in the field.

This systematic analysis reveals that the relationship between personality and sports performance is influenced by various factors, including the type of sport, the athletic population, and the athletes’ age. The analysis indicates that, aside from neuroticism, openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, and agreeableness display positive correlations with sports performance. Conscientiousness and extraversion emerge as predominant personality traits in team sports, contributing to team cohesion and, ultimately, improved outcomes. The influence of openness and agreeableness varies across different sports, with no definitive consensus on the specific sports they benefit. Overall, the findings offer promising insights into the potential of personality as a predictor of athletic performance. As a result, stakeholders such as applied sports psychologists, coaching staff, athletes, and sports administrators must adequately comprehend the role of personality and its pertinence to success in major competitions. Practitioners should advocate for the integration of personality assessment and development programs within the training process. To achieve this, a more profound understanding and utilization of personality concepts in physical education and sports are required, along with the development of effective, user-friendly personality tools and well-founded, easily implemented training programs.

YS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.