The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Sport Psychology
Volume 15 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1301978
This article is part of the Research Topic Psychological Factors in Physical Education and Sport - Volume IV View all 18 articles
Social Support, Network, and Relationships Among Coaches in Different Sports: A Systematic Review
Provisionally accepted- 1 School of Sports of Rio Maior, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Rio Maior, Santarém, Portugal
- 2 Quality of Life Research Center (CIEQV), Santarém, Portugal
- 3 Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
- 4 Independent researcher, Santarém, Portugal
- 5 Instituto Politecnico de Setubal (IPS), Setúbal, Setubal, Portugal
- 6 Department of Social Psychology, Social Anthropology, Social Work and Social Services,University of Malaga, Málaga, Spain
The study aims to analyze scientific publications on the association between social networks, social relationships, and social support for sports coaches. It seeks to identify the types and levels of social support provided by various agents, and to understand the impact of this support on coaches' well-being. The goal is to help coaches better utilize social support, thereby enhancing their quality of life, work, and performance. This study systematically reviewed 11 scientific articles to investigate the association between social support, social networks, and social relationships in sports coaches. It aimed to identify the types and levels of social support offered to coaches by family members, peers, and friends. Our research utilized the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and assessed study quality using the STROBE Statement. Eligibility was determined by the PECOS criterion based on the search strategy terms. Our findings indicate that social support has significant positive effects on sports coaches. It enhances self-compassion, prevents burnout symptoms, boosts job and life satisfaction, and reduces stress levels.Organizational support, characterized by clear guidelines, guidance, and autonomy, yielded positive outcomes. Conversely, the absence of social support correlated with negative outcomes for coaches, including lower self-compassion, increased stress and burnout symptoms, reduced job and life satisfaction, and heightened work-family conflict. Coaches' social networks encompassed family members, peers, friends, and other sources, with friends perceived as the most influential. Maintaining an effective social support network is crucial for coaches' performance and psychological well-being.In conclusion, this systematic review emphasizes the importance of social support for coaches in both their personal and professional lives, noting its positive effects and the negative consequences of its absence. Given the demanding nature of coaching, improving social support systems can enhance coaches' well-being and the success of sports activities.
Keywords: social support, Social network, social relationships, Sport, coaching
Received: 25 Sep 2023; Accepted: 21 Aug 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Ferreira, Rodrigues, Sobreiro, Silva, Santos, Carvalho, Hernández-Mendo and Rodrigues. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Filipe Rodrigues, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
João G. Ferreira
1,2