1 Introduction
Facial expressions play a critical role in intra-individual emotional functions (Finzi and Rosenthal, 2016) as well as inter-individual social functions (Keltner and Kring, 1998). Facial expressions have been proposed to be more important in late adulthood, given the increased value placed on intimate social relationships (Carstensen, 2006, 2021; Carstensen et al., 1999). In studies examining changes in emotional functioning over the course of adulthood, older adults' facial expressions in response to emotional stimuli have mainly been examined through comparison with those of young adults (e.g., Levenson et al., 1991).
Consistent with the notion of emotional functions of facial expressions, several studies in young adults have reported that the production of facial expressions showed coherence with the subjective experience of emotional feeling (e.g., Mauss et al., 2005; Evers et al., 2014; Sato et al., 2020, 2021; Sato and Kochiyama, 2022). For example, a study measured dynamic ratings of subjective emotional valence (i.e., hedonic tone ranting from positive to negative; Barrett, 2006) and facial electromyography (EMG) activity of the corrugator supercilii (i.e., brow lowering muscle) and zygomatic major (i.e., lip corner-pulling muscle) while participants watched emotional films (Sato et al., 2020). The results showed that the EMG activity of the corrugator supercilii and zygomatic major muscles was negatively and positively associated with the dynamic valence ratings, respectively. These findings are theoretically important because they empirically support the long-lasting idea that subjective emotional experience depends on the perception of bodily responses (James, 1884; Friedman, 2010; Lang, 1994). Furthermore, this issue could be practically important, because a previous study showed that the coherence between subjective emotional experience and bodily responses to emotional stimuli is associated with psychological wellbeing (Brown et al., 2020).
However, the coherence between emotional experience and facial expressions has not been fully examined in older adults. This issue could be interesting because several studies have suggested that older, compared with young, adults have improved emotional wellbeing (Carstensen, 2006, 2021; Charles, 2010; Carstensen et al., 1999; Charles and Piazza, 2023). One may expect that older adults would have stronger subjective–facial emotional coherence than young adults. This paper reviews the research conducted to date on this topic and describes our speculative hypotheses (cf. Currie, 2023).
2 Coherence between facial expressions and subjective emotional experience in older adults
Several previous studies have examined either the production of facial expressions or subjective emotional experience in older adults and reported mixed findings (Supplementary Table 1). Specifically, a substantial number of studies showed no age-related differences in facial expression production (Emery and Hess, 2011; Kunz et al., 2008; Lohani and Isaacowitz, 2014; Malatesta et al., 1987; Nangle et al., 2018; Saito et al., 2022; Seider et al., 2011; Tsai et al., 2000; van Reekum et al., 2011), although some studies reported less intense (Kunzmann et al., 2017; Labuschagne et al., 2020; Levenson et al., 1991; Magai et al., 2006; Pedder et al., 2016; Rohr et al., 2017; Saito et al., 2023) or more intense (Magai et al., 2006; Malatesta-Magai et al., 1992; Phillips et al., 2008; Zempelin et al., 2021) facial expressions in older than young adults. Fölster et al. (2014) reviewed the literature and concluded that there are no age-related differences in spontaneous facial expressions. Likewise, studies have reported different results with respect to subjective emotional experience, including comparable (Emery and Hess, 2011; Kunz et al., 2008; Malatesta et al., 1987; Nangle et al., 2018; van Reekum et al., 2011), weaker (Kunzmann et al., 2017; Labuschagne et al., 2020; Levenson et al., 1991; Malatesta-Magai et al., 1992; Saito et al., 2022, 2023; Tsai et al., 2000), or stronger (Labuschagne et al., 2020; Lohani and Isaacowitz, 2014; Magai et al., 2006; Pedder et al., 2016; Phillips et al., 2008; Rohr et al., 2017; Saito et al., 2023; Seider et al., 2011; Zempelin et al., 2021) subjective emotional responses in older adults relative to young adults. In short, the data do not consistently suggest alteration in either facial expressions or subjective emotional experience in older adults. Furthermore, the studies were not specifically concerned with coherence between these emotional responses.
Few studies have compared the coherence of facial expressions with subjective emotional experience between older adults and their young counterparts (Lohani et al., 2018; Saito et al., 2022, 2023) according to our computer-based search of abstract and citation databases of the literature. In Lohani et al. (2018), the researchers presented film clips to induce sad feelings as emotion-eliciting stimuli and measured the dynamic ratings of arousal (i.e., the feeling of activation; Barrett, 2006) and facial EMG of the corrugator supercilii in older and young participants. The results showed no significant age differences in the correlations between the subjective ratings and facial EMG. However, the null finding may be at least partially explained by the ratings measured in the study. Previous studies testing young adults and reported subjective–facial emotional coherence reported the links between the ratings of valence, but not arousal, and facial expressions (Bradley and Lang, 2000).
In Saito et al. (2023), five film clips that were categorically labeled as anger, sadness, neutral, contentment, and amusement, were used, and the coherence between dynamic valence ratings and facial EMG of the corrugator supercilia and zygomatic major muscles was assessed by adopting the procedures used in a previous study that demonstrated emotional coherence in young adults (Sato et al., 2020). The researchers compared correlation coefficients between older and young adults and found that the negative correlation between valence ratings and corrugator EMG activity was weaker in older adults (Figure 1A). More specifically, lower valence ratings (i.e., greater unpleasantness) were associated with greater corrugator EMG activity, and the association between brow activity (i.e., frowning, which reflects unpleasant feelings) and unpleasant emotions was weaker in older adults than in young adults, indicating less emotional coherence between subjective experience and brow activity in the former group.
Figure 1
Mean (with standard error) intra-individual correlation coefficients between subjective valence ratings and facial electromyography (EMG) activity in young (black bars) and older (white bars) adults. (A) Valence–corrugator (i.e., brow lowering muscle) EMG correlation during emotional film viewing in Saito et al. (2023). (B) Valence–masseter (i.e., chewing muscle) EMG correlation during gel-type food consumption in Saito et al. (2022). Both studies showed significantly weaker subjective–facial emotional coherence in older than young adults.
Saito et al. (2022) used food to elicit emotions similarly showed age-related differences in the coherence between facial expressions and subjective experience. In that study, various subjective ratings and facial EMG activity of the corrugator supercilia, zygomatic major, masseter (i.e., chewing muscle), and suprahyoid (i.e., swallowing muscle) were assessed in older adults while they consumed the flavored gel-type foods. Compared with young adults, the coherence of valence and wanting ratings with masseter EMG activity was lower in older adults (Figure 1B).
Taken together, among three studies that tested this topic, the two recent ones (Saito et al., 2022, 2023) suggested that the degree of coherence between subjective experience, specifically its qualitative aspects, and the production of facial expressions in response to emotional stimuli (film clips and food) differs according to age, i.e., is weaker in older adults. As described above, weaker subjective–facial emotional coherence in older adults appears not to be explained by their impairments in subjective emotional experiences or the production of facial expressions.
3 Discussion
Given that the mind–body coherence and wellbeing are related (Brown et al., 2020; Mauss et al., 2011), and that older adults tend to report higher levels of wellbeing than people in other stages of life (Carstensen et al., 1999; Carstensen, 2006, 2021), why is it that the coherence between subjective experience and facial expressions is weak in older adults?
We hypothesize that the coherence between the subjective experience and facial expressions may weaken with age as an emotional coping. It has been reported that older adults are better able to cope with emotions (Burr et al., 2021; Charles and Carstensen, 2008; Eldesouky and English, 2018; Scheibe and Blanchard-Fields, 2009; Neubauer et al., 2019; Lohani and Isaacowitz, 2014; Sims et al., 2015; Shiota and Levenson, 2009; however, see Isaacowitz, 2022) and use more emotional coping than young adults (Puente-Martínez et al., 2021). For instance, older adults were more successful than younger adults in terms of both deploying attentional resources (Scheibe et al., 2015; Mikkelsen et al., 2021) and positive reappraisal (Lohani and Isaacowitz, 2014; Shiota and Levenson, 2009). It has also been demonstrated that, rather than implementing response-focused coping, older adults are likely to use antecedent emotional coping (i.e., situation selection) in their daily lives, which is assumed to contribute to their ability to cope with emotions (Sims et al., 2015). Interestingly, several studies have reported that a repressive emotional coping style (Weinberger et al., 1979), which can induce low mind–body coherence (Schwerdtfeger and Kohlmann, 2004) and is traditionally regarded as maladaptive coping (Schwartz, 1990), sometimes serves adaptive functions, such as promoting resilience following extremely aversive events (e.g., Coifman et al., 2007; for a review, see Bonanno, 2005). Likewise, it may be possible that low subjective–facial emotional coherence in older adults has adaptive benefits on their emotional wellbeing.
However, there are several limitations in our speculation. First, few studies have investigated the coherence between facial expressions and subjective emotions in older adults, and those that did used limited methodologies compared with studies that were not specifically concerned with coherence. Thus, future research is warranted to confirm the robustness of the findings. Second, even assuming that older adults have weak subjective–facial emotional coherence, different factors may account for their high levels of wellbeing. The empirical evidence is needed to test the relationship between the subjective–facial emotional coherence and wellbeing in older adults.
In conclusion, studies examining the degree of coherence between subjective experience and facial expressions have demonstrated that older adults showed less coherence of subjective experience with corrugator and masseter EMG activity in response to emotional stimuli (films and food). We speculate that the weak coherence between subjective experience and facial expressions may serve as an emotional coping that is seemingly functionally adaptive for people in late adulthood.
Statements
Author contributions
WS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AS: Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by funds from the Japan Science and Technology Agency Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (grant number JPMJCR17A5).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417609/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Barrett L. F. (2006). Valence is a basic building block of emotional life. J. Res. Pers.40, 35–55. 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.006
2
Bonanno G. A. (2005). Resilience in the face of potential trauma. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.14, 135–138. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00347.x
3
Bradley M. M. Lang P. J. (2000). “Measuring emotion: behavior, feeling, and physiology,” in Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion, eds. R. D. Lane, and L. Nadel (New York: Oxford University Press), 242–276.
4
Brown C. L. Van Doren N. Ford B. Q. Mauss I. B. Sze J. W. Levenson R. W. (2020). Coherence between subjective experience and physiology in emotion: individual differences and implications for well-being. Emotion20, 818–829. 10.1037/emo0000579
5
Burr D. A. Castrellon J. J. Zald D. H. Samanez-Larkin G. R. (2021). Emotion dynamics across adulthood in everyday life: older adults are more emotionally stable and better at regulating desires. Emotion21, 453–464. 10.1037/emo0000734
6
Carstensen L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science312, 1913–1915. 10.1126/science.1127488
7
Carstensen L. L. (2021). Socioemotional selectivity theory: the role of perceived endings in human motivation. Gerontologist61, 1188–1196. 10.1093/geront/gnab116
8
Carstensen L. L. Isaacowitz D. M. Charles S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity. Am. Psychol.54, 165–181. 10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
9
Charles S. T. (2010). Strength and vulnerability integration: a model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychol. Bullet. 136, 1068–1091. 10.1037/a0021232
10
Charles S. T. Carstensen L. L. (2008). Unpleasant situations elicit different emotional responses in younger and older adults. Psychol. Aging23, 495–504. 10.1037/a0013284
11
Charles S. T. Piazza J. R. (2023). Looking back, forging ahead: Fifteen years of Strength and Vulnerability Integration (SAVI). Curr. Opin. Psychol.55:101751. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101751
12
Coifman K. G. Bonanno G. A. Ray R. D. Gross J. J. (2007). Does repressive coping promote resilience? Affective-autonomic response discrepancy during bereavement. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol.92, 745–758. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.745
13
Currie A. (2023). Science & speculation. Erkenntnis88, 597–619. 10.1007/s10670-020-00370-w
14
Eldesouky L. English T. (2018). Another year older, another year wiser? Emotion regulation strategy selection and flexibility across adulthood. Psychol. Aging33, 572–585. 10.1037/pag0000251
15
Emery L. Hess T. M. (2011). Cognitive consequences of expressive regulation in older adults. Psychol. Aging26, 388–396. 10.1037/a0020041
16
Evers C. Hopp H. Gross J. J. Fischer A. H. Manstead A. S. Mauss I. B. (2014). Emotion response coherence: a dual-process perspective. Biol. Psychol. 98, 43–49. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.003
17
Finzi E. Rosenthal N. E. (2016). Emotional proprioception: treatment of depression with afferent facial feedback. J. Psychiat. Res. 80, 93–96. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.06.009
18
Fölster M. Hess U. Werheid K. (2014). Facial age affects emotional expression decoding. Front. Psychol.5:73441. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00030
19
Friedman B. H. (2010). Feelings and the body: the Jamesian perspective on autonomic specificity of emotion. Biol. Psychol. 84, 383–393. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.10.006
20
Isaacowitz D. M. (2022). What do we know about aging and emotion regulation?. Persp. Psychol. Sci.17, 1541–1555. 10.1177/17456916211059819
21
James W. (1884). What is an emotion?Mind9, 188–205. 10.1093/mind/os-IX.34.188
22
Keltner D. Kring A. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Rev. General Psychol.2, 320–342. 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.320
23
Kunz M. Mylius V. Schepelmann K. Lautenbacher S. (2008). Impact of age on the facial expression of pain. J. Psychosom. Res.64, 311–318. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.09.010
24
Kunzmann U. Rohr M. Wieck C. Kappes C. Wrosch C. (2017). Speaking about feelings: further evidence for multidirectional age differences in anger and sadness. Psychol. Aging32, 93–103. 10.1037/pag0000142
25
Labuschagne I. Pedder D. J. Henry J. D. Terrett G. Rendell P. G. (2020). Age differences in emotion regulation and facial muscle reactivity to emotional films. Gerontology66, 74–84. 10.1159/000501584
26
Lang P. J. (1994). The varieties of emotional experience: a meditation on James-Lange theory. Psychol. Rev.101, 211–221. 10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.211
27
Levenson R. W. Carstensen L. L. Friesen W. V. Ekman P. (1991). Emotion, physiology, and expression in old age. Psychol. Aging6, 28–35. 10.1037/0882-7974.6.1.28
28
Lohani M. Isaacowitz D. M. (2014). Age differences in managing response to sadness elicitors using attentional deployment, positive reappraisal and suppression. Cognit. Emot.28, 678–697. 10.1080/02699931.2013.853648
29
Lohani M. Payne B. R. Isaacowitz D. M. (2018). Emotional coherence in early and later adulthood during sadness reactivity and regulation. Emotion18, 789–804. 10.1037/emo0000345
30
Magai C. Consedine N. S. Krivoshekova Y. S. Kudadjie-Gyamfi E. McPherson R. (2006). Emotion experience and expression across the adult life span: insights from a multimodal assessment study. Psychol. Aging21, 303–317. 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.303
31
Malatesta C. Z. Izard C. E. Culver C. Nicolich M. (1987). Emotion communication skills in young, middle-aged, and older women. Psychol. Aging2, 193–203. 10.1037/0882-7974.2.2.193
32
Malatesta-Magai C. Jonas R. Shepard B. Culver L. C. (1992). Type A behavior pattern and emotion expression in younger and older adults. Psychol. Aging7, 551–561. 10.1037/0882-7974.7.4.551
33
Mauss I. B. Levenson R. W. McCarter L. Wilhelm F. H. Gross J. J. (2005). The tie that binds? Coherence among emotion experience, behavior, and physiology. Emotion5, 175–190. 10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.175
34
Mauss I. B. Shallcross A. J. Troy A. S. John O. P. Ferrer E. Wilhelm F. H. et al . (2011). Don't hide your happiness! Positive emotion dissociation, social connectedness, and psychological functioning. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol.100, 738–748. 10.1037/a0022410
35
Mikkelsen M. B. Tramm G. O'Toole M. S. (2021). Age-group differences in instructed emotion regulation effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Aging36, 957–973. 10.1037/pag0000627
36
Nangle M. R. Bailey P. E. Henry J. D. Khlentzos G. S. Varcin K. J. Whitton A. E. (2018). Age invariance in rapid facial affective reactions to emotionally valenced stimuli. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol.71, 1687–1697. 10.1080/17470218.2017.1345960
37
Neubauer A. B. Smyth J. M. Sliwinski M. J. (2019). Age differences in proactive coping with minor hassles in daily life. J. Gerontol.: Series B74, 7–16. 10.1093/geronb/gby061
38
Pedder D. J. Terrett G. Bailey P. E. Henry J. D. Ruffman T. Rendell P. G. (2016). Reduced facial reactivity as a contributor to preserved emotion regulation in older adults. Psychol. Aging31, 114–125. 10.1037/a0039985
39
Phillips L. H. Henry J. D. Hosie J. A. Milne A. B. (2008). Effective regulation of the experience and expression of negative affect in old age. J. Gerontol. Series B, Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.63, 138–145. 10.1093/geronb/63.3.P138
40
Puente-Martínez A. Prizmic-Larsen Z. Larsen R. J. Ubillos-Landa S. Páez-Rovira D. (2021). Age differences in emotion regulation during ongoing affective life: a naturalistic experience sampling study. Dev. Psychol.57, 126–138. 10.1037/dev0001138
41
Rohr M. K. Wieck C. Kunzmann U. (2017). Age differences in positive feelings and their expression. Psychol. Aging32, 608–620. 10.1037/pag0000200
42
Saito A. Sato W. Ikegami A. Ishihara S. Nakauma M. Funami T. et al . (2022). Subjective–physiological coherence during food consumption in older adults. Nutrients14:4736. 10.3390/nu14224736
43
Saito A. Sato W. Yoshikawa S. (2023). Altered emotional mind–body coherence in older adults. Emotion24, 15–26. 10.1037/emo0001249
44
Sato W. Kochiyama T. (2022). Exploration of emotion dynamics sensing using trapezius EMG and fingertip temperature. Sensors22:6553. 10.3390/s22176553
45
Sato W. Kochiyama T. Yoshikawa S. (2020). Physiological correlates of subjective emotional valence and arousal dynamics while viewing films. Biol. Psychol.157:107974. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107974
46
Sato W. Murata K. Uraoka Y. Shibata K. Yoshikawa S. Furuta M. (2021). Emotional valence sensing using a wearable facial EMG device. Scient. Rep.11:5757. 10.1038/s41598-021-85163-z
47
Scheibe S. Blanchard-Fields F. (2009). Effects of regulating emotions on cognitive performance: What is costly for young adults is not so costly for older adults. Psychol. Aging24, 217–223. 10.1037/a0013807
48
Scheibe S. Sheppes G. Staudinger U. M. (2015). Distract or reappraise? Age-related differences in emotion-regulation choice. Emotion15, 677–681. 10.1037/a0039246
49
Schwartz G. E. (1990). “Psychobiology of repression and health: a systems approach,” in Repression and Dissociation: Implications for Personality Theory, Psychopathology, and Health, ed. J. L. Singer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 405–434.
50
Schwerdtfeger A. Kohlmann C. W. (2004). “Repressive coping style and the significance of verbal-autonomic response dissociations,” in Defense Mechanisms: Theoretical, Research, and Clinical Perspectives, eds. U. Hentschel, G. Smith, J. G. Draguns, and W. Ehlers (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 239–278.
51
Seider B. H. Shiota M. N. Whalen P. Levenson R. W. (2011). Greater sadness reactivity in late life. Soc. Cognit. Affect. Neurosci.6, 186–194. 10.1093/scan/nsq069
52
Shiota M. N. Levenson R. W. (2009). Effects of aging on experimentally instructed detached reappraisal, positive reappraisal, and emotional behavior suppression. Psychol. Aging24, 890 −900. 10.1037/a0017896
53
Sims T. Hogan C. Carstensen L. L. (2015). Selectivity as an emotion regulation strategy: Lessons from older adults. Curr. Opin. Psychol.3, 80–84. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.02.012
54
Tsai J. L. Levenson R. W. Carstensen L. L. (2000). Autonomic, subjective, and expressive responses to emotional films in older and younger Chinese Americans and European Americans. Psychol. Aging15, 684–693. 10.1037/0882-7974.15.4.684
55
van Reekum C. M. Schaefer S. M. Lapate R. C. Norris C. J. Greischar L. L. Davidson R. J. (2011). Aging is associated with positive responding to neutral information but reduced recovery from negative information. Soc. Cognit. Affect. Neurosci.6, 177–185. 10.1093/scan/nsq031
56
Weinberger D. A. Schwartz G. E. Davidson R. J. (1979). Low-anxious, high-anxious, and repressive coping styles: psychometric patterns and behavioral and physiological responses to stress. J. Abnormal Psychol.88, 369–380. 10.1037/0021-843X.88.4.369
57
Zempelin S. Sejunaite K. Lanza C. Riepe M. W. (2021). Emotion induction in young and old persons on watching movie segments: facial expressions reflect subjective ratings. PLoS ONE16:e0253378. 10.1371/journal.pone.0253378
Summary
Keywords
facial expressions, subjective experience, mind-body coherence, older adults, emotional coping
Citation
Sato W and Saito A (2024) Weak subjective–facial coherence as a possible emotional coping in older adults. Front. Psychol. 15:1417609. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417609
Received
15 April 2024
Accepted
19 August 2024
Published
04 September 2024
Volume
15 - 2024
Edited by
Jin Narumoto, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan
Reviewed by
Markku Kilpeläinen, University of Helsinki, Finland
Álvaro Ruiz-García, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre, Spain
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Sato and Saito.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wataru Sato wataru.sato.ya@riken.jp
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.