AUTHOR=Horton Calen J. , Walsh Lisa C. , Rodriguez Anthony , Kaufman Victor A. 

TITLE=Who does singlehood best? A latent profile analysis

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychology

VOLUME=Volume 16 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1509349

DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1509349

ISSN=1664-1078

ABSTRACT=Researchers have begun to address heterogeneity in the single population. Historically, singles have been differentiated either by their marital history (e.g., widowed, divorced, never-married) or by whether they considered their singlehood voluntary. However, these approaches leave many unanswered questions about heterogeneity among singles. Addressing heterogeneity is important in light of recent interest in understanding how well-being varies across categories of singles. In the present study, we address this question by using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) on a large cross-sectional sample of American singles (N = 4,835). Using LPA, we identified nine distinct profiles of singles differentiated by their romantic relationship goals (partner-seekers, casual-daters, and non-daters) and the perceived pressure they report experiencing from others to find a romantic partner (low-pressure, medium-pressure, and high-pressure). We then compared the profiles on levels of well-being, ill-being, personality, and socialization, as well as demographic, socioeconomic, and relationship history variables. Our analysis reveals several patterns of cross-category variability in outcomes, including some outcomes that vary primarily by romantic relationship goals, some that vary primarily by pressure, and others that vary according to a combination of both. Our results also suggest that two groups (low-pressure casual-daters and low-pressure non-daters) fare particularly well. They are also relatively common, comprising 30% of the sample. A third group—high-pressure non-daters—fare very poorly, and though they comprise only a small proportion of the sample (1.5%) the implications of this group are substantial when considered at national scale. The implications of these findings for research on singlehood and well-being are discussed.