AUTHOR=Zybarth David , Inhestern Laura , Bergelt Corinna 

TITLE=Psychometric re-evaluation of the German version of the Physicians’ Reaction to Uncertainty Scale

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Psychology

VOLUME=Volume 16 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1552177

DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1552177

ISSN=1664-1078

ABSTRACT=IntroductionUncertainties are an integral part of medicine and can lead to adverse effects if not addressed. However, assessing these uncertainties can be a challenging task. The Physicians’ Reaction to Uncertainty (PRU) scale is a widely used tool to assess behavioral and emotional reactions to uncertainty. This study aims to examine the factorial structure and re-evaluate the psychometric properties of the German version in a heterogeneous sample of physicians.MethodsWe conducted an online survey among German physicians, irrespective of their medical specialties. We calculated means, standard deviations, and difficulty and discrimination indices for the items. We computed Cronbach’s alpha for all subscales. We used confirmatory factor analyses to assess factorial validity due to discrepancies in the assignment of item 5 between the original and the German versions. In the original version, item 5 was assigned to the subscale “anxiety due to uncertainty.” In contrast, in the, based on exploratory factor analysis, it was assigned to the subscale “concern about bad outcomes.” We tested three models: Model 1 (the original version), Model 2 (the German version), and Model 3 (which excludes item 5).ResultsA total of 136 physicians (59% were women) from 22 different medical specialties participated in this survey. The German version exhibited good psychometric properties. Most item difficulties were acceptable, and all items demonstrated good item discrimination indices. The Cronbach’s alpha values were satisfactory for all subscales. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed a Heywood case for all models, which necessitated setting the variance of item 14 to zero. The fit indices for Models 1 and 2 were insufficient. Model 3 showed superior fit indices (robust root mean square error of approximation = 0.064, robust Tucker–Lewis index = 0.952, robust comparative fit index = 0.962). The Akaike’s information criterion and Bayesian information criterion statistics indicated a substantially better fit for Model 3 compared to Models 1 and 2.DiscussionThe 14-item German version of the Physicians’ Reaction to Uncertainty Scale demonstrated good psychometric properties in a heterogeneous sample of physicians. It serves as a valuable tool for assessing uncertainty and facilitating international comparisons of uncertainty scores and training effects. However, the German version appears to require further adaptation, particularly regarding item 5.