Abstract
Introduction:
Colours have been used as a complementary aid in the treatment of physical and mental disorders for centuries. There is substantial anecdotal evidence supporting the use of colours in therapeutic contexts, but scientific evidence remains limited. This review aimed to map existing literature on colour preferences among individuals with common mental health disorders, examine patterns across different diagnostic categories, and identify differences compared to healthy participants.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in four databases. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guide for scoping reviews. Studies that assessed the favourite or preferred colour of individuals diagnosed with mental health disorders were reviewed. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADS) and Elliot’s guide for evaluating the quality of colour and psychological research.
Results:
A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. Colour preferences were generally assessed using the Lüscher colour test, coloured cardboards, or digital colour representation. Distinct preferences for colours were observed across diagnostic categories—blue was preferred among those with depressive disorders, grey among those with anxiety-related disorders, and black among those with schizophrenia. Achromatic colours such as black or grey were not preferred by healthy participants. Healthy populations exhibited geographical variation in colour preferences, with European participants tending to prefer blue, while Asian participants preferred red and yellow. In contrast, no clear geographical patterns were observed among individuals with mental health disorders; preference patterns varied according to the diagnostic category.
Conclusion:
Colour preferences differed noticeably across various categories of common mental health disorders and from those of healthy individuals.
Systematic review registration:
The scoping review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework and the URL: https://osf.io/khr8q.
1 Introduction
Nearly one in seven individuals around the world were living with a mental health disorder in 2019, and this prevalence increased by 26%–28% during the COVID-19 pandemic (World Health Organization, 2022). The development of fast and inexpensive methods of diagnosis and ancillary treatment protocols for common mental health disorders is essential to address the global mental health crisis. For centuries, colour therapy has been used in traditional medicine, with practitioners exposing patients to coloured lights applied to different body areas to promote calm or energise, influence mood, and support physical and mental health (Azeemi et al., 2019). Currently, colours are used as a complement in treating various disorders (Au and Assavarittirong, 2021; Darewych and Riedel Bowers, 2018; Fitria et al., 2022; Kim and Kang, 2013), and colour therapy is advertised on websites. However, scientific evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of colour therapy is absent (Azeemi and Raza, 2005). Since colours are associated with mood and emotions (Jonauskaite and Mohr, 2025), colours may potentially serve as markers of mental wellbeing, mental states, or mental health disorders (Max and Scott, 1969; Martín López and Fernández Díaz, 2022; Han and Lee, 2017).
Colour perception starts with light absorption by the three types of cone photoreceptors in the retina and can be described by three perceptual values (Wyszecki and Stiles, 2000). Perceptually, colour is characterised by hue, chroma, and lightness, enabling the communication of colours by ascribing values to each of these three dimensions. One of the most common systems for this kind is the Munsell atlas, which is widely used in colour vision research (Munsell, 1905; Newhall et al., 1943). Quantitative description of colour is based on the results of colour matching experiments, which form the basis of the Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage (CIE) XYZ and related colour systems (Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage, 2004). While the CIE XYZ colour system and the Munsell atlas system provide accurate representations of colour for the majority of people, these systems do not describe colours as they are seen by 8% of men and 0.5% of women with colour vision deficiency (Birch, 2012). Therefore, screening for colour deficiencies is essential in research.
People usually communicate their experience with colours using colour terms, such as ‘red’, ‘green’, and ‘blue’. These terms correspond to concepts of colours, which have different symbolic meanings in different cultures (Littlemore et al., 2023), and cannot be directly related to actual colours because they describe large colour categories with variable boundaries (Witzel, 2019). While the association between colour terms and emotions is largely defined by culturally specific symbolic meanings of the colour, the association between actual colours and emotions may tap into the unconscious mind that is less influenced by cultural conventions and therefore may be better suited as markers of mental wellbeing (Jonauskaite et al., 2020b; Wang et al., 2014; Littlemore et al., 2023).
Swiss psychotherapist Max Lüscher developed a colour test to identify personality traits and the current emotional state of an individual through the unconscious selection of colour preferences from a set of coloured plates (Max and Scott, 1969). While some studies supported the use of the Lüscher test for the diagnosis of psychological disorders (Turubarova et al., 2025; Stanzani Maserati et al., 2019; Rahn, 1976), others argued that the Lüscher test is an unreliable diagnostic tool (Donnelly, 1974; Picco and Dzindolet, 1994; French and Alexander, 1972). Unfortunately, the Lüscher test is not standardised; neither its CIE coordinates nor Munsell values have been documented. Therefore, it is difficult to compare results from different laboratories. Many studies on the psychological effects of colour do not accurately specify the colours that they use or do not control for colour deficiency. Nevertheless, such studies can serve as a baseline for exploring patterns of colour choice based on mood states. Improving their methodological rigour could help bridge the gap between colour science and psychological research.
When mapping colours to mental health assessment, colour preferences and colour-to-emotion associations can vary based on mood and behaviour. For example, people with mood disorders and anxiety-related disorders tend to prefer unsaturated, grey tones, while individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) avoid the colour red, as it potentially triggers underlying negative emotions (Bobic and Pavicevic Lukrecija, 2007). In contrast, healthy individuals usually dislike brown, black, white, or grey colours (Carruthers et al., 2010; Garvey and Luxenberg, 1987; Nolan et al., 1995; Ran et al., 2017; Sharma et al., 2012) and most often prefer yellow or bright colours (Carruthers et al., 2010). There were differences in the drawings of healthy participants and individuals with diverse psychological symptoms when observed under chromatic and achromatic conditions. However, the differences were more prominent in chromatic drawings, as the number of colours was less in individuals with diverse psychological symptoms, and black was the main colour in their drawings (Jue and Kwon, 2013).
There are reports of impaired motor and visual functions among individuals suffering from certain psychiatric conditions. Functional vision loss, reduced contrast sensitivity due to altered dopaminergic neurotransmission, and colour vision impairments are associated with depressive disorders, bipolar disorders, and schizophrenia (Salmela et al., 2021; Tao et al., 2024; Gupta et al., 2024; Tran et al., 2024; Barrick et al., 2002; Deisenhammer et al., 2022; Bubl et al., 2009). The increased colour discrimination thresholds, decreased colour sensitivity, and colour vision deficits have been observed in bipolar disorder, depressive disorders, and schizophrenia, respectively (Tran et al., 2024; Barrick et al., 2002). Reduced contrast gain at the retinal level has also been reported as a marker in depressed patients (Bubl et al., 2010). These changes at every level of processing information may explain the preference for unsaturated, dark-toned colours, and self-reports of a grey or colourless perception among individuals with mental health disorders.
This review aimed to determine whether individuals with mental health disorders differ in their colour preferences from healthy individuals and if colour preferences can be used as markers in the identification of mental health disorders. This review explored colour preferences using actual colours rather than colour terms, as colour terms are shaped by linguistic context or societal meanings, while responses to perceptual stimuli could reflect biological predispositions or sensory experiences with colour (Wang et al., 2014).
2 Methods
This review was registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/khr8q). This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) (Tricco et al., 2018). This review adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review framework, and the population (adults with mental health disorders), concept (colour preferences), and context (different diagnostic categories with no restriction on gender, ethnicity, or geographic area) were used for the construction of the review (Pollock et al., 2023; Peters et al., 2024).
2.1 Identification of studies
2.1.1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Studies were included in the review if (1) colour preferences were reported among adults aged more than 18 years with mental health disorders; (2) actual colours (not colour terms) were shown through printed paper/cardboards, wall paints, digital colours on the computer, or treatment in the form of coloured capsules; (3) at least three of the four unique hues were used; and (4) mental health disorders were identified based on validated methods such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or the ICD. The study selection was not restricted to a particular geographic location. Studies were excluded if (1) the studies only assessed colour preferences among healthy participants and not individuals with mental health disorders and (2) the colour choices were assessed through paintings/artworks of the participants.
2.1.2 Search strategies and databases
The literature search for this review was conducted in three steps. The initial search was conducted in PubMed, OVID MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar databases. The second search was conducted using appropriate keywords, Boolean operators, and subject headings in all the relevant databases. ProQuest and thesis searches were also used for the identification of grey literature. Finally, a manual search of the reference lists of the relevant literature was also performed. The literature search was restricted to English-language publications using English search terms and was conducted from database inception to December 2023. Studies that were not available in English translation were excluded. The search was conducted between May 2024 and August 2024 by two independent reviewers (SK and RS) and was reviewed again in May 2025. The detailed search strategy is provided in Supplementary material. The search outputs were exported to EndNote, and the selection of the studies, removal of duplicates, and screening of the literature were performed within EndNote. The study selection process is provided in a flowchart according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
2.2 Data charting
The data were extracted in a pre-defined form that was specific to the current review. This extraction form was developed by one of the reviewers (SK) and was agreed upon by the other reviewers. After finalising the potentially eligible studies for review, the two independent reviewers evaluated the full text for inclusion in the current review, and reasons for exclusion were documented at each stage. The data extraction was carried out separately by the two reviewers, and the data were collated at the end to include all relevant information. Any discrepancy was resolved through discussions with the third reviewer (MV) until an agreement was reached.
A narrative synthesis of the review is reported, and the results are compiled according to the presentation and usage of colours, colour preferences among individuals with mental health disorders and healthy participants, and geographical or cultural differences in colour preferences.
2.3 Quality assessment
The quality appraisal was conducted to provide contextual insights into the methodological strengths and limitations of the included studies and was not used as a basis for study exclusion. The Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADS) and “Guidelines for a High-Quality Study on Color and Psychological Functioning,” as recommended by Elliot, were used to assess the methodological quality of the reviewed studies (Harrison et al., 2021; Elliot, 2019). The first tool consists of 13 items rated on a 3-point scale, with 0 representing no mention at all and 3 representing complete information, and the second tool consists of five items evaluated as one if they were controlled and zero if they were not controlled (Table 1). Raw scores and percentages were reported directly, without assigning quality rankings, in accordance with the recommendations of the selected appraisal tools. Extraction of data and quality assessments were conducted separately by the two independent reviewers, and the inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC) with a 95% confidence interval.
Table 1
| S no | Reviewed studies | Q1.1 | Q1.2 | Q1.3 | Q1.4 | Q1.5 | Q1.6 | Q1.7 | Q1.8 | Q1.9 | Q1.10 | Q1.11 | Q1.12 | Q1.13 | Score | Q2.1 | Q2.2 | Q2.3 | Q2.4 | Q2.5 | Score | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | Total (%) | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | SK | RS | Total (%) | ||
| 1 | Carruthers et al. (2010) | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 76.9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 40 |
| 2 | Garvey and Luxenberg (1987) | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 66.6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Korkmaz et al. (2016) | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 69.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Kuloğlu et al. (2002) | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 71.7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | Nolan et al. (1995) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48.7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| 6 | Ran et al. (2017) | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 74.3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 |
| 7 | Ross et al. (2010) | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 74.3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 80 |
| 8 | Schapira et al. (1970) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 61.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 |
| 9 | Sharma et al. (2012) | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 53.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | Hettiarachchi and Perera (2021) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 58.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| 11 | Bobic and Pavicevic Lukrecija (2007) | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 66.6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| 12 | Tao et al. (2015) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 64.1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 60 |
| 13 | Fernando et al. (1992) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 56.4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | Cernovsky and Fernando (1988) | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 43.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | Cernovsky et al. (1997) | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 58.9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | Holmes et al. (1985) | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 53.8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quality assessment of the reviewed studies by the reviewers.
Q1.1: The theoretical concepts supporting the research, Q1.2: clear statement of aims, Q1.3: research setting, Q1.4: target population, Q1.5: appropriate sampling techniques, Q1.6: rationale for choice of data collection tool, Q1.7: format and content of data collection tool, Q1.8: description of data collection tool, Q1.9: recruitment data provided, Q1.10: justification of analytic method selected, Q1.11: the appropriate method of analysis, Q1.12: inclusion of appropriate stakeholders in research, and Q1.13: critical discussion of strengths and weaknesses. Q2.1: Participant naiveté and confidentiality, Q2.2: assessment of and the omission of participants with colour vision deficiency, Q2.3: sample size estimation, Q2.4: colour specification and control, and Q2.5: background colour and illumination.
3 Results
3.1 Selection of literature
The initial literature search in the databases resulted in 1,077 articles. After removing duplicates, there were 774 articles for title and abstract screening, and the full texts of 126 articles were screened. This review included 16 published works, and the data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Figure 1 represents the flowchart of the study review process. There were 4,239 participants in the 16 included studies, among whom 35.98% (n = 1,525) were healthy volunteers and 64.02% (n = 2,714) were diagnosed with common mental health disorders. Depressive disorders (15.4%) were the most commonly studied, followed by anxiety and related disorders (10%), post-traumatic stress disorder (4.4%), schizophrenia (3.5%), and somatoform disorders (2%). Two of the studies did not classify participants (n = 1,212, 28.59%) into specific disorders. Table 2 provides a summary of this review.
Figure 1
Table 2
| Sno | Title | Mental health disorder category | Brief methodology | Presentation of colours | Number of colours used | Identification of mental health disorder | Preferred colour—mental health disorder (in order) | Preferred colour—healthy participant | Geography | Reports before and after therapy Methods and results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carruthers et al. (2010) | Depressive and anxiety-related disorders | Favourite colour and mood colour were assessed through a questionnaire that included an assessment of depression and anxiety, as well as the colour preferences. | Colour wheel based on The Munsell system was developed and printed on paper Hues—red, yellow, orange, green, blue, purple Four shades of each of the above colours Pink and brown Two achromatic colours—black and white | 38 | HAD scale | Blue Grey | Blue | Europe | No |
| 2 | Garvey and Luxenberg (1987) | Depressive disorder | Colour preferences were assessed among patients referred to a psychiatric clinic and were compared with those of healthy controls | Abstract colours Lüscher colour test | 8 | Hamilton depression scores Patients referred from the psychiatric outpatient department Controls were staff from the hospital | No difference | Yellow | America | No |
| 3 | Korkmaz et al. (2016) | Depressive and anxiety-related disorders | Participants were asked the first colour that comes to mind and their favourite colour using coloured cardboards | Abstract colours Coloured cardboards | 8 | Beck anxiety depression inventory | Blue Black Grey | Not assessed | Europe | No |
| 4 | Kuloğlu et al. (2002) | Depressive and anxiety-related disorders | Participants were asked to select a preferred colour from a set of colours presented on a cardboard | Abstract colours 4 cm2-coloured cardboards | 8 | DSM 4 | Green | Not assessed | Europe | No |
| 5 | Nolan et al. (1995) | Depressive disorder | Participants were given a demographic questionnaire, followed by printed colours and the Beck Depression Inventory | Abstract colours Colours printed on the paper, along with a questionnaire | 7 | BDI | Black | Other colours except black or brown | America | No |
| 6 | Ran et al. (2017) | Depressive and anxiety-related disorders | Colour preferences for abstract colour and environmental colours were assessed. For abstract colours, pairs of printed colours were presented, and for environmental colours, digital stimuli of different hospital ward walls were presented. | Abstract colours—coloured cards Environmental colours—hospital wards with different wall colours presented digitally | 9 | HAMA and HAMD | Blue | Red Blue Yellow | Asia | Antidepressant drug therapy No significant difference before and after therapy |
| 7 | Ross et al. (2010) | Depressive disorder | A pilot study that evaluated the effectiveness of colour therapy. Change in colour preferences before and after light therapy was assessed | Audio-Bio Colour system—digitally administered colour preference test 12 rows, 8 colours in squares presented in random order Each colour is presented 8 times Participants are instructed to discard 4 colours in each row | 12 | DSM 4 and for the level of depression PHQ9 | Blue | Not assessed | America | A weekly light session/colour routine was given as therapy. Different coloured lights were projected on the participant’s body Before therapy—blue After therapy—green and red |
| 8 | Schapira et al. (1970) | Anxiety-related disorder | Antidepressant drugs were administered in tablets of three different colours. The effectiveness of using different coloured tablets was assessed, thereby assessing the role of colours in the treatment of mental health disorders | Antidepressant drugs were given in the form of different coloured tablets | 3 | Clinically identified patients with anxiety during treatment A self-rated scale was used that was developed by Lader and Wing | No difference | Not assessed | Europe | Antidepressant drug therapy No significant difference before and after therapy |
| 9 | Sharma et al. (2012) | Depressive and anxiety-related disorders | The Lüscher colour test was used to identify the colour preferences among individuals with anxiety- and mood-related disorders | Abstract colours Lüscher colour test | 8 | ICD depression criteria | Grey | Blue Dislike black | Asia | No |
| 10 | Hettiarachchi and Perera (2021) | Depression, anxiety, and stress | Individuals with mobility impairments were assessed for mood- and anxiety-related disorders. They were exposed to different coloured wall panels in the hospital ward. The depression and anxiety ratings before and after exposure to different coloured wall panels were assessed | Environmental colours—wall colour | 3 | DASS 21S | Green | Not assessed | Asia | The wall panel was installed, and the participants were exposed to different wall colours. Depression and anxiety improved in green colour Yellow caused mild anxiety. |
| 11 | Bobic and Pavicevic Lukrecija (2007) | Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) | The colour preferences of prisoners of war were assessed to understand the association between PTSD and colour preferences | Abstract colours Lüscher colour test | 8 | DSM IV Psychodiagnostics testing and interviews | Green Violet | Not assessed | Asia | No |
| 12 | Tao et al. (2015) | Schizophrenia | Colour preferences of individuals with schizophrenia were compared with those of healthy volunteers | Abstract colours Colours presented on a monitor with a grey background colour | 11 | Schizophrenia diagnosed using ICD 10, followed by the ZKPQ test to assess personality traits | Black Brown | Green Yellow | Asia | No |
| 13 | Fernando et al. (1992) | Bipolar and schizophrenia | Colour preferences among individuals with mania, schizophrenia, and healthy volunteers were assessed to understand the role of colour preferences as a diagnostic sign | Abstract colours Lüscher colour test | 8 | DSM III R ICD 9 | No difference | No difference | America | No |
| 14 | Cernovsky and Fernando (1988) | Schizophrenia | Colour preferences among individuals with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers | Abstract colours Lüscher colour test | 8 | DSM III and ICD 9 | No difference | No difference | America | No |
| 15 | Cernovsky et al. (1997) | Schizophrenia | Colour preferences of individuals with borderline personality disorders and healthy individuals were assessed | Abstract colours Lüscher colour test | 8 | DSM III R | Black Red | Grey brown | America | No |
| 16 | Holmes et al. (1985) | NA | The association between colour preferences and psychiatric disorders was assessed | Abstract colours Lüscher colour test | 8 | DSM III | Yellow Red Blue | Not assessed | America | No |
Summary of the results from the review of 16 studies.
3.2 Classification of mental health disorders
Mental health disorders were classified based on validated scales or clinical assessment. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) was commonly used for the classification of common mental health disorders, and the version varied based on the year of administration. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale/Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMD and HAMA), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS) were used as measures (Table 2).
3.3 Usage of colours in the assessment of colour preferences
The number of colours used in the assessment of colour preferences ranged between 3 and 38, while the majority of studies used the Lüscher colour test. Korkmaz et al. (2016) and Kuloğlu et al. (2002) used the same colours as those used in the Lüscher test but replaced violet with pink to understand the association between colour and emotion (Korkmaz et al., 2016; Kuloğlu et al., 2002). However, there was no explanation for using pink instead of violet. Hettiarachchi and Hettiarachchi and Perera (2021) and Schapira et al. (1970) used only three of the four unique hues (red, green, yellow, and blue) (Schapira et al., 1970; Hettiarachchi and Perera, 2021). Achromatic colours (black and white) were used in 14 of the 16 studies (Table 2).
As the representation of colours plays a major role in understanding the relationship between sensory perception of colour and emotional response, Carruthers et al. (2010) developed a colour wheel based on the Munsell colour system with six primary colours (orange in addition to the five principal Munsell colours—red, green, yellow, blue, and purple), pink, and brown (Carruthers et al., 2010). These eight primary colours, along with achromatic colours (black, white, and grey), were presented in four different saturation levels/shades. This provided the participants a wider range of colour choices and may also help in understanding the connotations of the dark and light shades of the same colour.
3.4 Colour preferences among healthy individuals
Healthy participants in the included studies (Carruthers et al., 2010; Garvey and Luxenberg, 1987; Nolan et al., 1995; Ran et al., 2017; Sharma et al., 2012; Tao et al., 2015; Fernando et al., 1992; Cernovsky and Fernando, 1988; Cernovsky et al., 1997) reported varied colour preferences, and yellow was the most preferred colour, followed by green, red, and blue. None of the reviewed studies reported healthy participants preferring black, grey, or white.
3.5 Colour preferences among individuals with mental health disorders
Studies reported either the frequency of the preferred colour or favourite colour (Carruthers et al., 2010; Korkmaz et al., 2016; Kuloğlu et al., 2002; Nolan et al., 1995; Sharma et al., 2012; Hettiarachchi and Perera, 2021; Bobic and Pavicevic Lukrecija, 2007; Holmes et al., 1985) or ranked the preference of colour from most appealing to least appealing (Garvey and Luxenberg, 1987; Ross et al., 2010; Fernando et al., 1992; Cernovsky et al., 1997; Cernovsky and Fernando, 1988; Ran et al., 2017; Tao et al., 2015; Schapira et al., 1970) (Table 2). The results of colour preferences are compiled as the colour preferences for abstract colours, environmental colours, and the change in colour preferences after therapy (Table 2). Abstract colours refer to the representation of colours on paper, cardboard, or digital screens and environmental colours refer to the representation of colour in indoor settings such as room colour or wall colour.
When participants were instructed to pick a colour from printed sheets or digital materials without any specific instruction, blue was the preferred colour, followed by red, green, and grey. Participants with depressive disorders preferred blue and grey, while violet and brown were their least preferred colours (Carruthers et al., 2010; Korkmaz et al., 2016; Ran et al., 2017; Ross et al., 2010; Sharma et al., 2012). Participants with anxiety and related disorders preferred grey but did not prefer brown or yellow, while participants with post-traumatic stress disorder preferred violet and green equally, with the least preference given to brown, red, and grey (Bobic and Pavicevic Lukrecija, 2007; Hettiarachchi and Perera, 2021; Kuloğlu et al., 2002).
When participants were asked to rank colours in order of their liking, blue was ranked first, followed by green among participants with depressive disorders, while those diagnosed with schizophrenia preferred black more than other colours (Cernovsky et al., 1997; Tao et al., 2015; Garvey and Luxenberg, 1987; Ran et al., 2017). Healthy volunteers and participants with mental health disorders ranked the colours similarly, with no significant differences in the order of colour ranking (Fernando et al., 1992; Cernovsky and Fernando, 1988).
The preferences for colour for indoor environments, such as hospitals, classrooms, or indoor decor, were evaluated among participants with schizophrenia and depressive disorders. Participants with schizophrenia preferred black and red for the living room decor but did not prefer grey (Cernovsky et al., 1997). Individuals with depressive disorders preferred blue for the classroom environment and green for the hospital environment but did not prefer yellow, as it induced anxiety (Hettiarachchi and Perera, 2021). Among those with depressive disorders, purple ranked second among the preferred colours for indoor environments, while yellow, orange, black, and grey were the least preferred colours (Ran et al., 2017).
3.6 Change in colour preferences after therapy
The colour preferences were assessed before and after therapeutic interventions using two methods: therapy using antidepressants (Ran et al., 2017; Schapira et al., 1970) and exposure to colours as a therapy (Ross et al., 2010; Hettiarachchi and Perera, 2021) (Table 2). Antidepressant drugs were administered as coloured capsules, and the mood status of the participants was assessed using a self-rating scale and physician assessment (Schapira et al., 1970). No statistically significant differences were observed between different coloured capsules, but a trend towards improved mood with yellow-coloured capsule was observed (Schapira et al., 1970). In addition, during antidepressant therapy, preference for grey decreased after therapy, and preference for yellow increased (Ran et al., 2017). Participants were exposed to colours on a digital screen as therapy, or the room colours were altered to understand the preferences of colour before and after therapy. The colour preferences after exposure to different colours resulted in increased preferences for green and red and a decreased preference for blue (Hettiarachchi and Perera, 2021; Ross et al., 2010).
3.7 Geographical and cultural preferences
The studies were conducted across Asian (n = 5), American (n = 7), and European (n = 4) regions, with nine studies reporting colour preferences among healthy participants (Table 2). A distinct pattern was observed among healthy volunteers: Europeans preferred blue, Asians preferred red and yellow, and healthy Americans exhibited more varied preferences. Individuals diagnosed with mental health disorders did not report a consistent region-specific pattern of colour preferences (Table 2). Instead, colour preferences appeared to be influenced by the diagnostic category. Participants with depressive disorders and anxiety-related disorders preferred blue and green, whereas those diagnosed with schizophrenia preferred black.
Given that both healthy European participants and individuals with depressive disorders preferred blue, this pattern was examined further within the reviewed studies. Among the included studies, only one European study directly compared healthy volunteers with individuals with depressive disorders using blue hues of varying brightness (Carruthers et al., 2010). In this study, healthy volunteers preferred brighter shades of blue, while those with depressive disorders preferred darker shades of blue. The remaining studies did not include hues with varying brightness, limiting broader interpretation. These findings suggest that, while geographical trends may influence general colour preference in healthy populations, diagnostic factors may play a more substantial role in shaping colour preferences within clinical populations.
3.8 Quality of the studies
The inter-rater agreement is represented using the intraclass correlation coefficient, with a 95% confidence interval. The scores for the quality of studies are presented as a percentage by calculating the number of reported criteria divided by the total number (39 for QuADS and 5 for the guidelines by Elliot). For example, when a study reported the experimental setup, including background and illumination, question number five would be rated 1, if not zero. Using the QuADS tool, the score ranged between 41.03 and 79.49%, with an average score of 61.7% ± 11.5, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was found to be 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.80—0.97). The score for the tool developed by Elliot, specifically for colour psychology studies, ranged between 0 and 80%, and the majority of the studies had a score of 0 (Table 1). The intraclass correlation coefficient for quality assessment was found to be 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.71—0.97). Table 1 provides the quality assessment conducted by the reviewers.
4 Discussion
Colour preferences among individuals with mental disorders are distinct from those of healthy individuals and depend on the type of mental health disorder. There is a widespread interest in the topic of the relationship between colours and mental health, with many informal reports and anecdotal evidence available on the Internet, but there are only 16 published studies that examined the colour preferences among individuals with mental health disorders.
The general methodological quality assessment showed that overall quality was moderate. The questions that assess the analytical methods adopted and the integration of stakeholders in designing the research and data collection were graded the lowest. The quality assessment of colour psychology studies also showed that many studies did not account for the standards recommended in colour science, including diverse samples and cross-cultural validation. The majority of the studies in the review did not control for colour vision deficiency. Although no significant association between colour vision deficiency and colour–emotion association has been reported, individuals without colour vision deficiency were more consistent in associating colours with emotions than those with colour vision deficiency (Jonauskaite et al., 2021). Lack of control for colour vision deficiency can contribute to inconsistencies in the reporting of colour preferences.
Another important methodological consideration relates to the presentation and specification of colour dimensions. The reviewed studies used colour stimuli that lacked quantitative specifications, such as the Lüscher Colour Test, coloured card samples, or wall colours. Colours were described with colour names such as ‘red’, ‘green’, and ‘blue’, without specification of hue, lightness, or chroma, and stimulus presentation conditions, such as lighting and screen calibration, were not reported. This absence of colorimetric specification makes it impossible to verify whether colours labelled identically across studies were perceptually equivalent. Future research should adopt precise stimulus presentation by reporting standardised colorimetric coordinates and lighting conditions to improve reproducibility and comparability across studies.
Colour preferences and colour–emotion associations generally depend on culture, gender, and ethnicity (Taylor et al., 2013; Jonauskaite et al., 2020a). European men prefer blue/green colours over red, while European women prefer shades of red (Al-Rasheed, 2015). In China, both men and women prefer red, as it is a symbol of luck (Cheng et al., 2009; Luo, 2022; Wang et al., 2014). Indian women prefer orange to yellow hues, while British women prefer lavender hues (Bonnardel et al., 2012). Colour preferences among healthy participants show a consistent pattern when they are from geographically close regions (Jonauskaite et al., 2020a). However, the colour preferences among individuals with mental health disorders showed no region-specific pattern but were distinct for each category of mental health disorder (Table 2).
Individuals with depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and schizophrenia preferred blue, grey, and black colours, respectively (Table 2). The colour preferences after treatment changed to colours that were similar to those preferred by healthy individuals (Ran et al., 2017; Schapira et al., 1970; Ross et al., 2010; Hettiarachchi and Hettiarachchi and Perera, 2021). The mechanism of these preferences is still not clearly understood. For example, blue is reported to have both positive (calming and pleasant) and negative (depressing and sad) valence. We do not know whether individuals with depressive disorders prefer blue because they find it calming or because it is associated with feelings of depression. Individuals with depressive disorders generally show sad mood, insomnia, decreased energy levels, decreased psychomotor activity (Sekhon and Gupta, 2024), and their tendency to prefer calmness is substantial, as explained by the emotional valence theory (Palmer and Schloss, 2010; Taylor and Franklin, 2012). Preference for black among those with schizophrenia may relate to the colour’s widely recognised symbolic association (black mood, fear, unknown, and absence) and the emotional state of the individual (neuroticism) (Tao et al., 2015). One study has reported the colour preferences of prisoners of war with post-traumatic stress disorder, and they did not prefer the colour red as it triggered past traumatic events (Bobic and Pavicevic Lukrecija, 2007). Exploring colour preferences could be a useful tool in the identification of the disorder, planning of treatment approaches, and monitoring of disease progression.
This review followed established guidelines for conducting a scoping review and included studies assessing colour preferences among individuals with mental health disorders. The included studies were heterogeneous in their experimental designs and diagnostic criteria for mental health conditions, which limited the direct comparability and generalisability of the findings. Although the search strategy included major databases and grey literature sources, it was conducted using English-language search terms only. This may have introduced selection bias and limited the inclusion of relevant studies published in other languages and not translated to English, thereby narrowing the breadth of the evidence base.
5 Conclusion
Colour preferences vary systematically across mental health disorders and differ from those of healthy individuals. Individuals with mood disorders, anxiety disorders, PTSD, and schizophrenia tend to prefer darker, unsaturated colours, whereas healthy participants favour brighter hues. These patterns should be interpreted with caution given the moderate methodological quality and heterogeneity of the included studies, including a lack of standardised colour specification. Colour has the potential to be used as a complementary marker in the diagnosis and monitoring of mental health disorders. However, a necessary step in this direction is using stimuli that are colorimetrically characterised.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
SK: Methodology, Conceptualization, Data curation, Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Software, Visualization, Project administration. RS: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Software, Formal analysis, Project administration, Visualization. FS: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. MV: Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Validation.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. SK is funded by the University of Auckland Doctoral Scholarship. The funding providers had no role in the design and conduct of the study or in the preparation, review, or approval of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author MV declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1832200/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Al-RasheedA. S. (2015). An experimental study of gender and cultural differences in hue preference. Front. Psychol.6:30. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00030,
2
AuT. Y.AssavarittirongC. (2021). The overview of utilizing complementary therapy to relieve stress or anxiety in emergency department patients: animal-assisted therapy, art therapy, and music therapy. Ment. Health: Glob. Challenges J.4. doi: 10.32437/mhgcj.v4i2.125
3
AzeemiS. T. Y.RazaS. M. (2005). A critical analysis of Chromotherapy and its scientific evolution. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med.2, 481–488. doi: 10.1093/ecam/neh137,
4
AzeemiS. T.YousufH. M.RafiqI. I.KazmiS. R.AzeemiA. (2019). The mechanistic basis of chromotherapy: current knowledge and future perspectives. Complement. Ther. Med.46, 217–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.08.025,
5
BarrickC. B.TaylorD.CorreaE. I. (2002). Color sensitivity and mood disorders: biology or metaphor?J. Affect. Disord.68, 67–71. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00358-X,
6
BirchJ. (2012). Worldwide prevalence of red-green color deficiency. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A29, 313–320. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.29.000313,
7
BobicJasminkaPavicevic Lukrecija, and MilicaGomzi. (2007). Post-traumatic stress disorder and color preference in released prisoners of war. Stud. Psychol.49, 223–232.
8
BonnardelV.BeniwalS.DubeyN.PandeM.BimlerD. (2012). Color preferences: a British/Indian comparative study. Colour and Environment: Proceedings of the AIC 2012 Interim Meeting. 102–105
9
BublE.KernE.EbertD.BachM.Van ElstL. T. (2010). Seeing gray when feeling blue? Depression can be measured in the eye of the diseased. Biol. Psychiatry68, 205–208. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.02.009,
10
BublE.Van ElstL. T.GondanM.EbertD.GreenleeM. W. (2009). Vision in depressive disorder. World J. Biol. Psychiatry10, 377–384. doi: 10.1080/15622970701513756,
11
CarruthersH. R.MorrisJ.TarrierN.WhorwellP. J. (2010). The Manchester color wheel: development of a novel way of identifying color choice and its validation in healthy, anxious and depressed individuals. BMC Med. Res. Methodol.10:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-12,
12
CernovskyZ. Z.FernandoL. M. D. (1988). Color preference of ICD-9 schizophrenics and Normal controls. Percept. Mot. Skills67, 159–162. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.67.1.159,
13
CernovskyZ. Z.FernandoM. L. D.HusseinF.FernandoM. C. K. (1997). Color preferences of borderline patients and of normal controls. Percept. Mot. Skills84, 1347–1353. doi: 10.2466/pms.1997.84.3c.1347,
14
ChengF. F.WuC. S.YenD. C. (2009). The effect of online store atmosphere on consumer’s emotional responses - an experimental study of music and colour. Behav. Inf. Technol.28, 323–334. doi: 10.1080/01449290701770574
15
Commission Internationale de l'Éclairage (2004). Colorimetry. 3rd Edn Vienna: CIE Central Bureau(CIE 15:2004).
16
DarewychO. H.Riedel BowersN. (2018). Positive arts interventions: creative clinical tools promoting psychological well-being. Int. J. Art Ther.23, 62–69. doi: 10.1080/17454832.2017.1378241
17
DeisenhammerE. A.StrasserA.KemmlerG. (2022). Reduced ability to discriminate Colours–an under-recognised feature of depressive disorders? A pilot study. Int. J. Psychiatry Clin. Pract.26, 321–326. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2021.1993263,
18
DonnellyF. A. (1974). The Luscher color test: reliability and selection preferences by college students. Psychol. Rep.34, 635–638. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1974.34.2.635
19
ElliotA. J. (2019). A historically based review of empirical work on color and psychological functioning: content, methods, and recommendations for future research. Rev. Gen. Psychol.23, 177–200. doi: 10.1037/gpr0000170
20
FernandoM. L. D.CernovskyZ. Z.HarricharanR. (1992). Color preference of DSM-III-R bipolars and normal controls. Soc. Behav. Pers.20, 247–250. doi: 10.2224/sbp.1992.20.4.247
21
FitriaV.ErnawatiD.Hayatun NufusE.NovianaK. (2022). The effectiveness of Hiper (Harapan Ibu Tentang Persalinan) coloring therapy to reduce fear of facing childbirth during a pandemic. Indones. J. Glob. Health Res.4:911. doi: 10.37287/ijghr.v4i4.1397
22
FrenchC. A.AlexanderA. B. (1972). The Luscher color test: an investigation of validity and underlying assumptions. J. Pers. Assess.36, 361–365. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1972.10119772
23
GarveyM. J.LuxenbergM. (1987). Comparison of color preference in depressives and controls. Psychopathology20, 268–271. doi: 10.1159/000284510,
24
GuptaA.TranJ.FabianoN.DhirV.LaroseK.LaskerI.et al. (2024). Colour vision defects in schizophrenia Spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Neurosci. Appl.3:104046. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104046,
25
HanS.LeeD. (2017). The effects of treatment room lighting color on time perception and emotion. J. Phys. Ther. Sci.29, 1247–1249. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1247,
26
HarrisonR.JonesB.GardenerP.LawtonR. (2021). Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies. BMC Health Serv. Res.21. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06122-y
27
HettiarachchiA.A.PereraD.R. (2021). Impact of colour on depression, anxiety and stress levels of physically disabled patients in health care facilities. 14th International Research Conference - FARU 2021. 61–70
28
HolmesC. B.FoutyH. E.WurtzP. J.BurdickB. M. (1985). The relationship between color preference and psychiatric disorders. J. Clin. Psychol.41, 746–749. doi: 10.1002/10974679(198511)41:6%3C746::AID-JCLP2270410603%3E3.0.CO;2-Q,
29
JonauskaiteD.Abu-AkelA.DaelN.OberfeldD.Abdel-KhalekA. M.Al-RasheedA. S.et al. (2020a). Universal patterns in color-emotion associations are further shaped by linguistic and geographic proximity. Psychol. Sci.31, 1245–1260. doi: 10.1177/0956797620948810,
30
JonauskaiteD.CamenzindL.ParragaC. A.DioufC. N.Mercapide DucommunM.MüllerL.et al. (2021). Colour-emotion associations in individuals with red-green colour blindness. PeerJ9:e11180. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11180,
31
JonauskaiteD.MohrC. (2025). Do we feel Colours? A systematic review of 128 years of psychological research linking Colours and emotions. Psychon. Bull. Rev.32, 1457–1486. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02615-z,
32
JonauskaiteD.ParragaC. A.QuiblierM.MohrC. (2020b). Feeling blue or seeing red? Similar patterns of emotion associations with colour patches and colour terms. i-Perception11:2041669520902484. doi: 10.1177/2041669520902484,
33
JueJ.KwonS. M. (2013). Does colour say something about emotions?: laypersons’ assessments of colour drawings. Arts Psychother.40, 115–119. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2012.12.005
34
KimM. K.KangS. D. (2013). Effects of art therapy using color on purpose in life in patients with stroke and their caregivers. Yonsei Med. J.54, 15–20. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.1.15,
35
KorkmazS.ÖzerÖ.KayaŞ.KazganA.AtmacaM. (2016). The correlation between color choices and impulsivity, anxiety and depression. Eur. J. Gen. Med.13, 47–50. doi: 10.29333/ejgm/1592
36
KuloğluM.AtmacaM.TezcanA. E.UnalA.GeciciO. (2002). Color and number preferences of patients with psychiatric disorders in eastern Turkey. Percept. Mot. Skills.94, 207–213. doi: 10.2466/pms.2002.94.1.207,
37
LittlemoreJ.BolognesiM.Julich-WarpakowskiN.LeungC. H.SobrinoP. P. (2023). Metaphor, Metonymy, the Body and the Environment: An Exploration of the Factors that Shape Emotion-Colour Associations and their Variation Across Cultures. Cambridge University Press.
38
LuoS. (2022). Examining the association between color and mood. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Education, Language and Art (ICELA 2021), 253–259. Paris: Atlantis Press
39
Martín LópezL.Fernández DíazA. B. (2022). Interior environment design method for positive mental health in lockdown times: color, textures, objects, furniture and equipment. Designs6:35. doi: 10.3390/designs6020035
40
MaxL.ScottI. (1969). The Luscher Color Test. Edited by Scott (Trans and Ed) Ian. New York: Random House.
41
MunsellA. H. (1905). A Color Notation. Boston: G.H. Ellis Co.
42
NewhallS. M.NickersonD.JuddD. B. (1943). Final report of the OSA subcommittee on the spacing of the Munsell colors. J. Opt. Soc. Am.33, 385–418. doi: 10.1364/JOSA.33.000385
43
NolanR. F.DaiY.StanleyP. D. (1995). An investigation of the relationship between color choice and depression measured by the Beck depression inventory. Percept. Mot. Skills81, 1195–1200. doi: 10.2466/pms.1995.81.3f.1195,
44
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71,
45
PalmerS. E.SchlossK. B. (2010). An ecological valence theory of human color preference. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA107, 8877–8882. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906172107,
46
PetersM. D. J.GodfreyC.McInerneyP.MunnZ.TriccoA. C.KhalilH. (2024). Scoping reviews. JBI Evid. Synth. doi: 10.46658/JBIMES-24-09
47
PiccoR. D.DzindoletM. T. (1994). Examining the Lüscher color test. Percept. Mot. Skills79, 1555–1558. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.3f.1555,
48
PollockD.PetersM. D. J.KhalilH.McInerneyP.AlexanderL.TriccoA. C.et al. (2023). Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid. Synth.21, 520–532. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00123,
49
RahnR. C. (1976). Lüscher color theory: civilians and criminals. Art Psychotherapy3, 145–155. doi: 10.1016/0090-9092(76)90020-X
50
RanM.TanX.JiangG.ChenX.YangH.YuanG. (2017). Probe into color preference in inpatients with depressive disorders. J. Psychiatr. Brain Sci.2. doi: 10.20900/jpbs.20170010
51
RossM. J.GuthrieP.HarperS. H.DeeseM. N. (2010). The color preferences of treatment resistant depressed patients: a pilot study. Subtle Energ. Energy Med. J. Arch.21, 47–54.
52
SalmelaV.SocadaL.SöderholmJ.HeikkiläR.LahtiJ.EkelundJ.et al. (2021). Reduced visual contrast suppression during major depressive episodes. J. Psychiatry Neurosci.46, E222–E231. doi: 10.1503/jpn.200091,
53
SchapiraK.McClellandH. A.GriffithsN. R.NewellD. J. (1970). Study on the effects of tablet colour in the treatment of anxiety states. Br. Med. J.1, 446–449. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5707.446,
54
SekhonS.GuptaV. (2024). “Mood Disorder,” in StatPearls, (Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing).
55
SharmaA.SharmaV.SinghT. B. (2012). A study of trigunas and color preferences among patients of depression and obsessive compulsive disorder. Indian J. Posit. Psychol.3, 58–61.
56
Stanzani MaseratiM.MitoloM.MediciF.D’OnofrioR.OppiF.PodaR.et al. (2019). Color choice preference in cognitively impaired patients: a look inside Alzheimer’s disease through the use of Lüscher color diagnostic. Front. Psychol.10:1951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01951
57
TaoB. K.-L.XieJ. S.MargolinE. (2024). Functional vision disorder: a review of diagnosis, management and costs. Br. J. Ophthalmol.108, 1479–1485. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-324856,
58
TaoB.XuS.PanX.GaoQ.WangW. (2015). Personality trait correlates of color preference in schizophrenia. Transl. Neurosci.6, 174–178. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2015-0018,
59
TaylorC.CliffordA.FranklinA. (2013). Color preferences are not universal. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.142, 1015–1027. doi: 10.1037/a0030273
60
TaylorC.FranklinA. (2012). The relationship between color-object associations and color preference: further investigation of ecological valence theory. Psychon. Bull. Rev.19, 190–197. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0222-1,
61
TranJ.GuptaA.FabianoN.DhirV.LaroseK.LaskerI.et al. (2024). Colour vision impairments in bipolar disorder: a systematic review. Neurosci Appl.3:104057. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104057,
62
TriccoA. C.LillieE.ZarinW.O’BrienK. K.ColquhounH.LevacD.et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med.169, 467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
63
TurubarovaA.Pozdniakova-KyrbiatievaE.HordiienkoN.ZherebtsovaT. (2025). The influence of color on the psycho-emotional state of individuals across different age periods. Public Adm. Law Rev.2, 111–125. doi: 10.36690/2674-5216-2025-2-111-125
64
WangT.ShuS.MoL. (2014). Blue or red? The effects of colour on the emotions of Chinese people. Asian J. Soc. Psychol.17, 152–158. doi: 10.1111/ajsp.12050
65
WitzelC. (2019). Misconceptions about colour categories. Rev. Phil. Psych.10, 499–540. doi: 10.1007/s13164-018-0404-5
66
World Health Organization (2022). Mental disorders. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders (Accessed July 6, 2026).
67
WyszeckiG.StilesW. S. (2000). Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae. 2nd Edn New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Summary
Keywords
colour preferences, diagnostic marker, mental health, mood and anxiety disorders, scoping review
Citation
Krishnamurthy S, Shen R, Sundram F and Vorobyev M (2026) Colour preferences among individuals with common mental health disorders: a scoping review. Front. Psychol. 17:1832200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1832200
Received
16 March 2026
Revised
15 May 2026
Accepted
24 June 2026
Published
22 July 2026
Volume
17 - 2026
Edited by
Flavia De Simone, Suor Orsola Benincasa University, Italy
Reviewed by
Natanael Antonio Dos Santos, Federal University of Paraíba, Brazil
Jemima Teji, University College London, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Krishnamurthy, Shen, Sundram and Vorobyev.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Misha Vorobyev, m.vorobyev@auckland.ac.nz
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.