ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Neuropsychology
Mapping Cognitive Targeting and Discursive Conditions Associated with Emotional Exploitation in the Russia–Ukraine Conflict (2014–2026): A Text-as-Data Analysis of Strategic Framing and Semantic Structure
- JC
Juan Camilo Urazan 1
- MG
Marelo Gaete Fernandez 2
- SR
Sara Russo 3
- LM
Lina Maria Patricia Manrique Villanueva 1
- GO
Guillermo Orozco Becerra 1
1. Escuela Superior de Guerra (ESDEG), BOGOTÁ D.C., Colombia
2. Universidad Arturo Prat, Iquique, Chile
3. Centro Alti Studi per la Difesa, Rome, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Introduction: Cognitive warfare has become a central dimension of contemporary conflict because it targets perception, attention, interpretation, and judgment through strategically organized communicative environments. This study analyzed the semantic structure of public discourse on the Russia--Ukraine conflict between 2014 and 2026 to identify how cognitive targeting and discursive conditions associated with emotionally salient framing are distributed across actor settings, and to assess whether these patterns support the interpretation of cognitive warfare as an empirically observable structural dimension of the conflict. Methods: The study used a quantitative-computational text-as-data design implemented in R on a stratified corpus of 173 documents, including institutional documents, think tank reports, press and analytical coverage, and official statements. After standardized preprocessing, the corpus was examined through correspondence analysis, lexical specificity analysis, semantic co-occurrence networks, and nonparametric tests of group differences. Results: The analysis identified a dual semantic architecture composed of a cognitive dimension centered on information, media, disinformation, influence, and narrative construction, and an operational dimension associated with events, territoriality, and military action. Think tank reports concentrated the lexicon linked to the cognitive dimension, whereas press and analytical coverage dominated the operational dimension. Conclusion: The findings indicate that cognitive warfare functions as an autonomous and systematically distributed component of conflict discourse. Methodologically, the study shows that text-as-data approaches can recover latent structures of cognitive targeting in heterogeneous corpora and can help map the discursive environments within which cognitive and affective processes may later be examined in psychological and neuropsychological research.
Summary
Keywords
conflict, disinformation, Emotion-Cognition Interaction, Russia, Strategic communication, Ukraine
Received
14 April 2026
Accepted
29 May 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Urazan, Fernandez, Russo, Manrique Villanueva and Orozco Becerra. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Juan Camilo Urazan
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.