AUTHOR=Peng Xin , Yin Jin , Wang Yi , Chen Xinrui , Qing Liyuan , Wang Yunna , Yang Tong , Deng Dan 

TITLE=Retirement and elderly health in China: Based on propensity score matching

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Public Health

VOLUME=Volume 10 - 2022

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.790377

DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2022.790377

ISSN=2296-2565

ABSTRACT=Background: The relationship between retirement and health is important to the formulation of retirement related policies but is a controversial topic, perhaps because selection bias has not been well addressed in previous studies through traditional analysis methods. Using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), this study explored the potential impact of retirement on the health of elderly Chinese individuals, adjusting for selection bias. 
Methods: We balanced the baseline differences between retirement groups and working groups based on nearest neighbor matching and genetic matching with a generalized boosted model (GBM), and regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of retirement on the health of elderly individuals. 
Results: No significant difference was found in any of the covariates between the two groups after matching. Genetic matching performed better than nearest neighbor matching in balancing the covariates. Compared to the working group, the retirement group had a 0.79 (95% CI: 0.65~0.96, P<0.05) times higher probability of self-reported physical pain, a 0.55 (95% CI: 0.43~0.69, P<0.001) times higher probability of depression, and a 0.76-point (95% CI: 0.53~0.99, P<0.001) improvement in cognitive status score. For women, but not men, the probability of self-reported physical pain was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.53~0.95, P<0.05) times higher in the retirement group than in the working group. For those with the low education levels, but not middle or high levels, the retirement group had 0.63 (95% CI: 0.46-0.87, P=0.004) times higher self-reported physical pain and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.50-0.95, P=0.02) times higher depression than the working group. Compared with the working group, the cognitive status of the retirement group was significantly higher by 1.43 points in the lower education level (95% CI: 1.03-1.83, P<0.001) and 0.37 points in the middle level (95% CI: 0.12-0.62, P<0.001); there was no difference at the high level.
Conclusions: Retirement can exert a beneficial effect on the health of elderly individuals. Therefore, the government and relevant departments should consider this potential effect when instituting policies that delay retirement.