AUTHOR=Wang Danni , He Qiangsheng , Xia Bin , Zheng Jie , Cao Wangnan , Su Shaochen , Hu Fulan , Li Jiang , Zhang Yuelun , Ren Zhengjia , Li Xue , Wu Xinyin , Huang Yafang , Tang Yongjiang , Wei Fuxin , Zou Huachun , Jiang Huaili , Huang Junjie , Meng Wenbo , Bai Ming , Yang Kehu , Yuan Jinqiu , on behalf of the Chinese Health RIsk MAnagement Collaboration (CHRIMAC) TITLE=A protocol of Chinese expert consensuses for the management of health risk in the general public JOURNAL=Frontiers in Public Health VOLUME=11 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1225053 DOI=10.3389/fpubh.2023.1225053 ISSN=2296-2565 ABSTRACT=Introduction

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) represent the leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide. Robust evidence has demonstrated that modifiable lifestyle factors such as unhealthy diet, smoking, alcohol consumption and physical inactivity are the primary causes of NCDs. Although a series of guidelines for the management of NCDs have been published in China, these guidelines mainly focus on clinical practice targeting clinicians rather than the general population, and the evidence for NCD prevention based on modifiable lifestyle factors has been disorganized. Therefore, comprehensive and evidence-based guidance for the risk management of major NCDs for the general Chinese population is urgently needed. To achieve this overarching aim, we plan to develop a series of expert consensuses covering 15 major NCDs on health risk management for the general Chinese population. The objectives of these consensuses are (1) to identify and recommend suitable risk assessment methods for the Chinese population; and (2) to make recommendations for the prevention of major NCDs by integrating the current best evidence and experts’ opinions.

Methods and analysis

For each expert consensus, we will establish a consensus working group comprising 40–50 members. Consensus questions will be formulated by integrating literature reviews, expert opinions, and an online survey. Systematic reviews will be considered as the primary evidence sources. We will conduct new systematic reviews if there are no eligible systematic reviews, the methodological quality is low, or the existing systematic reviews have been published for more than 3 years. We will evaluate the quality of evidence and make recommendations according to the GRADE approach. The consensuses will be reported according to the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT).