AUTHOR=Vojtech Lucia , Paktinat Shahrokh , Luu Tiffany , Teichmann Stella , Soge Olusegun O. , Suchland Robert , Barbee Lindley A. , Khosropour Christine M. 

TITLE=Use of viability PCR for detection of live Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Reproductive Health

VOLUME=Volume 5 - 2023

YEAR=2023

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/reproductive-health/articles/10.3389/frph.2023.1199740

DOI=10.3389/frph.2023.1199740

ISSN=2673-3153

ABSTRACT=The current testing approach to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection relies on nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). These tests are highly sensitive, but do not distinguish between active infection and residual bacterial nucleic acid which may remain after resolution of infection, or via cross-contamination. Better methods to assess the viability of CT detected in clinical samples would be useful in determining the relevance of CT detection in a variety of clinical settings. The goal of this study was to test viability PCR (vPCR) as a method to distinguish viable bacteria from nonviable CT.The vPCR relies on a propidium monoazide dye, which intercalates into DNA from dead organisms and prevents their detection in PCR for the ompA gene. We used digital PCR to quantify absolute genome copy numbers. We validated the vPCR approach using stocks of CT with known viability. Then, we tested total DNA, viable CT DNA, and culture results from 18 vaginal specimens and 25 rectal specimens, all of which had tested positive by NAAT. In laboratory stocks of CT, vPCR using defined ratios of heat-killed to live bacteria tracked closely with expected results. In vaginal specimens, vPCR and total DNA results were correlated, though total DNA genomes outnumbered viable genomes. As expected, vPCR detected more total genomes than culture results. Both vPCR and total DNA correlated with culture results. Ten rectal NAAT positive specimens were negative by total DNA PCR, vPCR, and were negative or inconclusive by culture. Of the 6 rectal specimens that were culture positive, all were total DNA and vPCR positive. vPCR additionally detected viable bacterial DNA in 8 specimens which were NAAT+ and culture negative, though levels were very low. Conclusions: vPCR is a fast and easy method to assess viability in clinical specimens and is more correlated with culture results than total DNA PCR. Inconsistent ratios between total DNA and vPCR results suggest that the amount of dead bacteria varies considerably in clinical specimens. Results from rectal specimens suggest that many NAAT positive specimens do not in fact represent live replicating bacteria, and likely result in significant overuse of unnecessary antibiotics.