ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Robot. AI
Sec. Field Robotics
Benchmarking Robots for Everyday Environments: From Lab Experiments to Real-World Operations
- RM
Raphael Memmesheimer 1
- MO
Martina Overbeck 2
- DB
Dominik Beyer 2
- BK
Björn Kral 3
- SB
Sabine Bellmann 2
- SS
Sven Schneider 4
- JZ
Jan Zimmermann 4
- AM
Anna-Maria Meer 5
- MK
Medina Klicic 6
- SR
Simone Roth 6
- CS
Carolin Straßmann 6
- AA
Alexander Arntz 6
- MW
Marlene Wessels 7
- JK
Johannes Kraus 7
- PS
Paul Schweidler 8
- TS
Tristan Schnell 2
- CZ
Christoph Zimmermann 2
- BP
Benedikt Pulver 9
- WS
Wilhelm Stork 2
- MG
Martin Gersch 3
- SB
Sven Behnke 10
- AR
Arne Roennau 11
1. University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
2. Forschungszentrum Informatik, Karlsruhe, Germany
3. Freie Universitat Berlin, Berlin, Germany
4. Institut fur Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung, Sankt Augustin, Germany
5. Fraunhofer-Institut fur Produktionstechnik und Automatisierung IPA, Stuttgart, Germany
6. Hochschule Ruhr West - Campus Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany
7. Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz, Mainz, Germany
8. HFC Human-Factors-Consult GmbH, Berlin, Germany
9. TUV SUD AG, Munich, Germany
10. Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, Bonn, Germany
11. Karlsruher Institut fur Technologie, Karlsruhe, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
This study introduces an interdisciplinary framework for benchmarking robots deployed in public environments, addressing the gap between traditional laboratory metrics and real-world benchmarking requirements. We evaluate three distinct robots across diverse use cases—outdoor park cleaning, pedestrian underpass cleaning, and interactive library assistance—each representing unique challenges in public daily life. Over a three-year benchmarking process (2023– 2025) comprising seven benchmarking events, a consensus workshop and six on-site evaluations (two per use case), we utilized realistic indoor and outdoor test environments to assess not only technical performance but also the broader implications of deploying robots in unstructured, human-centric settings. An expert panel, spanning robotics, human-robot interaction, safety, and economics, systematically developed and refined an evaluation concept to analyze the transition from laboratory prototypes to operational systems. Our findings highlight critical factors for successful deployment, including task fulfillment, interaction quality, safety, and economic feasibility. This work provides actionable insights for researchers and practitioners aiming to bridge the gap between robotic innovation and real-world applicability.
Summary
Keywords
Benchmarking methodology, field robotics, human-robot interaction, Public spaces, real-world deployment, Robot safety, service robotics, social robotics
Received
18 June 2026
Accepted
31 August 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Memmesheimer, Overbeck, Beyer, Kral, Bellmann, Schneider, Zimmermann, Meer, Klicic, Roth, Straßmann, Arntz, Wessels, Kraus, Schweidler, Schnell, Zimmermann, Pulver, Stork, Gersch, Behnke and Roennau. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Raphael Memmesheimer; Martina Overbeck; Dominik Beyer
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.