<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Soil Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Soil Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Soil Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2673-8619</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsoil.2023.1097965</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Soil Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Tracing <sup>33</sup>P-labelled organic phosphorus compounds in two soils: New insights into decomposition dynamics and direct use by microbes</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wasner</surname>
<given-names>Daniel</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2098227"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prommer</surname>
<given-names>Judith</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zezula</surname>
<given-names>David</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2153285"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mooshammer</surname>
<given-names>Maria</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/95784"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Yuntao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/626336"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wanek</surname>
<given-names>Wolfgang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/36901"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Soil Resources, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich</institution>, <addr-line>Zurich</addr-line>, <country>Switzerland</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Center of Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science</institution>, <addr-line>Vienna</addr-line>, <country>Austria</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Department of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg</institution>, <addr-line>Salzburg</addr-line>, <country>Austria</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory</institution>, <addr-line>Berkeley, CA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Federica Tamburini, ETH Z&#xfc;rich, Switzerland</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Sebastian Loeppmann, University of Kiel, Germany; Steffen A. Schweizer, Technical University of Munich, Germany</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Daniel Wasner, <email xlink:href="mailto:daniel.wasner@usys.ethz.ch">daniel.wasner@usys.ethz.ch</email>; Wolfgang Wanek, <email xlink:href="mailto:wolfgang.wanek@univie.ac.at">wolfgang.wanek@univie.ac.at</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Soil Biogeochemistry  Nutrient Cycling, a section of the journal Frontiers in Soil Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>23</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>3</volume>
<elocation-id>1097965</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>14</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>18</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Wasner, Prommer, Zezula, Mooshammer, Hu and Wanek</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wasner, Prommer, Zezula, Mooshammer, Hu and Wanek</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Organic phosphorus (Po) compounds constitute an important pool in soil P cycling, but their decomposition dynamics are poorly understood. Further, it has never been directly tested whether low molecular weight Po compounds are taken up by soil microbes in an intact form, which reduces the dependence of their P acquisition on extracellular phosphatases.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We investigated the short-term fate (24 h) of five 33P-labelled Po compounds (teichoic acids, phospholipids, DNA, RNA and soluble organophosphates) and 33P-labelled inorganic P (Pi) in two soils.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>We found indications that soil microbial breakdown of phosphodiesters was limited by the depolymerization step, and that direct microbial uptake of Po occurred to a substantial extent.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>We postulate a trade-off between direct Po uptake and complete extracellular Po mineralization. These findings have profound consequences for our understanding of microbial P cycling in soils.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>organic phosphorus</kwd>
<kwd>soil microbes</kwd>
<kwd>phosphorus uptake</kwd>
<kwd>decomposition</kwd>
<kwd>depolymerization</kwd>
<kwd>microbial activity</kwd>
<kwd>phosphatase</kwd>
<kwd>soil phosphorus cycle</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="111"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="10838"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Phosphorus (P) is a key constituent of the cellular machinery across all life forms, and it is increasingly recognized that the P cycle has important implications for global carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling, as the dynamics of these cycles are closely interlinked (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). In contrast to the high demand for P by organisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>), the bioavailability of P in soils - the prime source of P in terrestrial ecosystems &#x2013; can be low, thereby often creating a situation of P limitation in ecosystems. The amount of bioavailable P in soils thus represents a crucial bottleneck in P cycling, as it sets a frame for how much P can enter the biotic component of the terrestrial P cycle.</p>
<p>Bioavailable P in soils is considered to be mainly supplied in inorganic form (P<sub>i</sub>) by desorption/dissolution processes from the solid phase and by decomposition and mineralization of organic P (P<sub>o</sub>) compounds, with their relative contribution strongly varying between ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>). Organic P constitutes 20-80% of total soil P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>), and is therefore an essential component in the terrestrial P cycle. The pool of P<sub>o</sub> consists of a highly heterogeneous group of compounds, such as phosphate monoesters (phosphomonoesters), phosphate diesters (phosphodiesters) and organic phosphonates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>). Moreover, a range of organic phosphorus compounds in soil still remains uncharacterized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>). A considerable fraction of extractable soil P<sub>o</sub> has been shown to consist of large molecules (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>), and to be closely associated with large structures of soil organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>). Different P<sub>o</sub> compounds have different chemical properties, pathways of decomposition and therefore degrees of bioavailability to soil microbes. Microbial turnover and root cell lysis release especially phosphodiesters into soils, as those are the major P components of all living microbial and plant cells, including nucleic acids (DNA and RNA), phospholipids and teichoic acids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). Different from previous estimates of the predominance of phosphomonoesters (e.g. phytates &#x2013; inositol polyphosphates) in soil P<sub>o</sub>, 2D-NMR and back-calculation of the <italic>in situ</italic> soil P<sub>o</sub> speciation showed that phosphodiesters like RNA (41%), phospholipids (28%) and DNA (22%) dominate the soil P<sub>o</sub> pool (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>).</p>
<p>Major strides have been recently made towards a better understanding of soil P speciation, but also in soil P<sub>i</sub> dynamics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>) and in linking microbial community structure with soil P availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). In contrast to these advances, much less is known about (i) the pathways and controls of soil P<sub>o</sub> decomposition and P<sub>o</sub> mineralization and (ii) whether or not microbes can directly utilize low molecular weight P<sub>o</sub> compounds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>). The P<sub>o</sub> decomposition process involves cleavage of the compounds by extracellular phosphatases, which are produced by plants and microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). The cleavage of phosphodiesters is mediated by specific phosphodiesterases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>), and the final dephosphorylation of the formed phosphomonoesters to free P<sub>i</sub> is performed by acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>). If P<sub>i</sub> is the main form acquired by all organisms to meet their P demand and given that phosphomonoesterases are abundant and ubiquitous in soils, soil P cycling might be rate-limited by the depolymerization and cleavage of diesters to smaller oligomers and to monomers (phosphomonoesters), while dephosphorylation of phosphomonoesters to P<sub>i</sub> is rapid (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). In this case, the initial breakdown step may determine the rate of P<sub>o</sub> mineralization. An analogous situation is known from soil N transformation processes, where depolymerization of high molecular weight organic N compounds such as proteins, chitin or peptidoglycan represents the bottleneck of soil N cycling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Schematic representation of soil P cycle processes. Bio-available P<sub>o</sub> is mineralized extracellularly, where phosphodiesters are depolymerized by phosphodiesterases, yielding smaller phosphomonoesters. Phosphomonoesters can be dephosphorylated by phosphomonoesterases, and the resulting bio-available P<sub>i</sub> can be taken up by the microbial community. In microbes, P<sub>o</sub> compounds are synthesized and mineralized. P<sub>i</sub> can be exuded by microbes, and P<sub>o</sub> is mainly released into soil <italic>via</italic> microbial turnover. Soil P<sub>i</sub> (and P<sub>o</sub>) are subject to sorption and desorption processes. The current paradigm is that bio-available P<sub>o</sub> cannot be directly taken up by soil microbes. Fluxes in red are in the focus of this study.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-03-1097965-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Tracing the pathways and measuring the gross rates of P<sub>o</sub> decomposition requires homogeneously radio-isotopically labelled (<sup>33</sup>P or <sup>32</sup>P) and purified P<sub>o</sub> compounds, which are rarely (nucleotides, glucose-6-phosphate) or not at all commercially available and very expensive to obtain by custom synthesis. To our knowledge, few studies have therefore directly traced the decomposition and fate of radiotracer-labelled organic P compounds in soils. To date, only radio-P labelled RNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>), a cytosine dinucleotide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>), phytate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>), glucose-6-P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>) and bacterial or fungal necromass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>) have been studied. Further, except for Harrison (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>), studies have been carried out with only one P<sub>o</sub> compound per study, thus impeding comparative assessments of decomposition dynamics of various P<sub>o</sub> forms in different soils. Actual decomposition dynamics of most P<sub>o</sub> compounds in soil and their controls have therefore remained largely elusive.</p>
<p>The current paradigm in soil microbial ecology is that microbes fully meet their P demand by the uptake of P<sub>i</sub>. Utilization of P<sub>o</sub> therefore only occurs after complete extracellular mineralization of P<sub>o</sub> through phosphatases to P<sub>i</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>). For this purpose, soil microbes produce a wide range of phosphomonoesterases (acid and alkaline phosphatases, phytases, phosphonatases) and phosphodiesterases (nucleases, phospholipases, glycerophosphodiesterases). However, some of the responsible genes are restricted to smaller phylogenetic groups while others are relatively ubiquitous (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>). Transporters for P<sub>i</sub>-uptake are ubiquitous and well-studied in bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>) and fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>). P<sub>i</sub> is efficiently taken up against steep concentration gradients by high affinity phosphate:H<sup>+</sup> symporters (PHT protein family). In contrast, transporters for P<sub>o</sub> compounds are less thoroughly studied. While some P<sub>o</sub> uptake systems were only recently discovered (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>), others are well understood in model organisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>). For example, uptake systems for glycerol-3-phosphate (GlpT), hexose-6-phosphate (UhpT) and phosphoglycerate (PgpT) belonging to the organophosphate:phosphate antiporter (OPA) family are well known (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>), and have been characterized in several species of bacteria and eukaryotes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>). Despite awareness of the existence of microbial P<sub>o</sub> transporters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>), we lack knowledge about the occurrence and potential ecological relevance of direct microbial P<sub>o</sub> uptake in the soil environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>). Direct uptake of P<sub>o</sub> compounds could shortcut the extracellular mineralization step and potentially directly fuel salvage pathways or precede intracellular mineralization. Microbial use of P<sub>o</sub> would therefore not be exclusively regulated by the production of extracellular enzymes, but rather be subject to metabolic controls that involve the balance between extracellular P<sub>o</sub> mineralization and direct uptake.</p>
<p>In this study, we therefore assessed the decomposition kinetics of five <sup>33</sup>P-labelled P<sub>o</sub> compounds and addressed the following research questions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>): Is the mineralization rate of phosphodiester compounds (teichoic acids, phospholipids, DNA, RNA) limited by the initial depolymerization and cleavage steps to monoesters, or by dephosphorylation of the intermediate phosphomonoester to free P<sub>i</sub>? (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>) Do soil microbes directly take up and utilize P<sub>o</sub> in an intact form or only after complete mineralization to P<sub>i</sub>? To tackle these questions, we developed a novel protocol to produce <sup>33</sup>P-labelled biochemical fractions that are relevant constituents of the soil P<sub>o</sub> pool: cell walls (containing wall teichoic acids, TA), lipids including phospholipids (PL), DNA, RNA and soluble organophosphates (SOP). We added these five <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>-fractions in purified form as well as <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> to two soils (temperate cropland and temperate pasture; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) and traced the radioisotope with high temporal resolution over a time span of 24&#xa0;h into the extractable P<sub>o</sub> and P<sub>i</sub> pools of soils and microbes, utilizing sequential P extraction and isobutanol fractionation of P<sub>o</sub> and P<sub>i</sub>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Physicochemical properties and potential extracellular enzyme activities of the two soils used in this study.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Parameter</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Soil</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">Arable</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Pasture</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bedrock</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Limestone</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Limestone</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sand (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Silt (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Clay (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH<sub>(CaCl2)</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Organic C (mg g<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total N (mg g<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total P (&#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1774.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1720.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total extractable P (&#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Extractable P<sub>i</sub> (&#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Extractable P<sub>o</sub> (&#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Microbial P (&#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">108.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">P diesterase (nmol pNP g<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">391 (S.E. &#xb1; 11)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">119 (S.E. &#xb1; 26)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">P monoesterase (nmol pNP g<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">630 (S.E. &#xb1; 48)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">842 (S.E. &#xb1; 82)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="fnT2_1">
<p>All data presented in this table describes the soils in their unmanipulated state at the start of the incubation experiments. P<sub>i</sub>, inorganic phosphorus; P<sub>o</sub>, organic phosphorus; S.E., standard error.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Soil characterization and experimental design</title>
<p>Two agricultural topsoils (0-15&#xa0;cm, Luvisols on limestone) were collected from an arable field and a pasture site grazed by cattle at Moarhof [Trautenfels, Styria, Austria; 47&#xb0;31&#x2019;04&#x2019;&#x2019; N, 14&#xb0;04&#x2019;31&#x2019;&#x2019; E; 640&#xa0;m a.s.l.; MAT: 7&#xb0;C; MAP: 1230&#xa0;mm; see (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>)] in September 2016. We selected the arable and pasture soils under the assumption that contrasting management should lead to major differences in organic vs. inorganic P cycling. Phosphorus cycling in the pasture should be more dominated by organic P, through intense topsoil rooting and high microbial activity, while cycling in the cropland should be dominated by inorganic P through decadal mineral P fertilizer amendment. Soils were sieved to 2&#xa0;mm and stored air dried, and two weeks prior to the experiments they were rewetted to 60% of their water holding capacity and kept at room temperature (25&#xb0;C). Sand content was determined by wet sieving to 0.05&#xa0;mm, after suspending the soil in 5% (w/v) sodium hexametaphosphate, clay content was calculated by using a pipette method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>) and silt content was calculated by difference. Soil pH was measured in 10 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub> in a 1:5 (w/v) soil slurry using an ISFET electrode (Sentron, Netherlands). Soil organic C and total soil N were measured by elemental analyser (CE1110, Thermo Fisher), after removal of carbonates by HCl treatment. Potential activities of extracellular phosphomonoesterases and -diesterases were measured one time after two weeks of pre-incubation, directly before the start of the experiment. The measurements were done photometrically in triplicates using p-nitrophenyl (pNP) coupled substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">51</xref>), at native soil pH using a modified universal buffer (MUB, exact description in the reference) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>). Briefly, 1.5&#xa0;g of soil were dissolved in 40&#xa0;ml of MUB and dispersed by ultrasonication with an energy input of 8.5 J ml<sup>-1</sup>. Subsequently, the soil slurry was mixed 1:1 (v/v) with 5 mM substrate solutions (pNP-phosphate for phosphomonoesterase, and bis-pNP-phosphate for phosphodiesterase, in MUB) in Eppendorf tubes, using wide pore pipette tips. After incubation for 1&#xa0;h at 20&#xb0;C under continuous shaking, the tubes were centrifuged at 10 000&#xa0;g, and the supernatant was mixed with 1 M NaOH (10:1 (v/v)) to terminate enzyme activity and start the color reaction. Samples were diluted and transferred to a 96-well microtiter plate, and in addition a standard row was prepared by a 1:2 dilution series of 1 mM p-nitrophenol, as well as substrate controls without soil slurry. Absorbance of all wells was read at 410 nm with a microplate photometer (Tecan Infinite M200, Tecan Trading AG). Values were corrected for substrate controls, and potential extracellular enzyme activities were expressed as nmol pNP g<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>. Soil total P was determined colorimetrically with the malachite-green method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>) after ignition (450&#xb0;C, 5&#xa0;h) of 0.5&#xa0;g dry soil and subsequent extraction with 20 mL 0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> for 16&#xa0;h. Soil P<sub>i</sub> was determined on unignited soils using the same protocol, and total P<sub>o</sub> by difference. In brief, the malachite green method was applied to quantify P<sub>i</sub> in soil extracts (after dilution with deionized water) as follows: 200 &#xb5;L of the respective extracted solution were pipetted into a microtiter plate. First, 40 &#xb5;L of malachite green reagent A (16.8&#xa0;ml of 95 &#x2013; 97% H2SO4 and 1.76&#xa0;g (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>6</sub>Mo<sub>7</sub>O<sub>24</sub> 4H<sub>2</sub>O, filled up to 100&#xa0;ml with H<sub>2</sub>O) were added, and after 10&#xa0;min 40 &#xb5;L of reagent B (0.875&#xa0;g polyvinyl alcohol (MW = 72 000&#xa0;g mol<sup>-1</sup>) with 87 mg malachite green oxalate in 250&#xa0;ml H<sub>2</sub>O) were added. After 45&#xa0;min of incubation, the absorbance was read at 610 nm with a microplate photometer. A 1:2 dilution series of 32 &#xb5;M KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> was used as concentration standards. Total dissolved P (TDP) and P<sub>i</sub> were measured in 0.5 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub> extracts after acidification with 2.75 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> (10% (v/v)), with or without acid persulfate digestion with 5% (v/v) acidic persulfate (0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> + 0.5 M Na<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>8</sub>, autoclaved at 121&#xb0;C for 60&#xa0;min) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">54</xref>), using the malachite green method. Microbial P was measured using chloroform (CHCl<sub>3</sub>) fumigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">55</xref>). Soil was incubated in CHCl<sub>3</sub> saturated atmosphere for 48&#xa0;h to lyse microbial cells. After fumigation, acid persulfate-digestion as described above was performed on 0.5 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub> extracts, yielding TDP of the soil plus the microbial biomass. P<sub>i</sub> concentration was measured colorimetrically by the malachite green method. Microbial P was calculated as the difference in TDP between fumigated and unfumigated samples, applying an extraction factor k<sub>EP</sub> of 0.4 based on an established literature value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">55</xref>). Soil parameters are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Production of <sup>33</sup>P-labelled organic compounds</title>
<p>To produce and purify <sup>33</sup>P-labelled organic compounds, the gram-positive bacterium <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> was grown in liquid medium amended with <sup>33</sup>P-labelled orthophosphoric acid. We then applied optimized biochemical fractionation protocols to fractionate the <sup>33</sup>P enriched culture into the five biochemical compound groups for use as substrates in the incubation experiment: cell walls containing wall teichoic acids (TA, glycerophosphate diester polymers), lipids including phospholipids (PL), DNA, RNA and soluble organophosphates (SOP). We did not investigate the fate of inositol phosphates, which are major P storage compounds in higher plants. Inositol phosphates, particularly myo-inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6), often accumulate in soils and constitute a large proportion of the soil phosphomonoester P<sub>o</sub> pool, due to their resistance to mineralization and strong sorption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>). Though microbes have been reported to produce IP6, the production of <sup>33</sup>P-labelled IP6 by plants or microbes remains very complicated, and we therefore did not include this compound class in this study. To keep losses of <sup>33</sup>P-substrate by radioactive decay as low as possible, the entire labelling and biochemical fractionation procedure was performed twice, directly before each of the two incubation experiments with either soil. A detailed description of the enrichment and fractionation protocol is provided in the supplementary material (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary S1</bold>
</xref>.1 Production of <sup>33</sup>P-labelled organic compounds).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Incubation experiment</title>
<p>We performed the incubation experiment twice, each time for one soil (i.e., arable and pasture). Each of the five <sup>33</sup>P-labelled organic substrates plus inorganic <sup>33</sup>P (P<sub>i</sub>) were applied individually to the soils. The <sup>33</sup>P activity that was applied to each sample ranged between 1.5 and 44 kBq, depending on substrates and soils (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). A schematic overview of the workflow of the incubation experiments is given in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<p>Every soil x substrate combination was incubated in triplicates in 50 mL polypropylene tubes at room temperature, and incubations were stopped at seven time points (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 10, 24&#xa0;h). All substrates were applied in 200 &#xb5;L deionized water on 2&#xa0;g fresh soil equilibrated at 60% WHC, except for PL. Because of its amphiphilic character, the PL fraction was first dissolved in chloroform (CHCl<sub>3</sub>) and added onto 180 mg acid washed glass beads (&#x2264;106 &#xb5;m) in small aliquots. After the evaporation of CHCl<sub>3</sub>, the beads were mixed with the soil aliquots and 200 &#xb5;L deionized water was added. At the end of the incubations, we performed a sequential P extraction with 0.5 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub> to extract available soil P (P<sub>soil</sub>) and subsequently microbial P (P<sub>mic</sub>). The detailed protocol is given in the supplementary material (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary S1</bold>
</xref>.2 Sequential extraction). To separate P<sub>i</sub> and P<sub>o</sub>, isobutanol fractionation was conducted as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">59</xref>), on aliquots of P<sub>soil</sub> and P<sub>mic</sub>, in which P<sub>i</sub> binds to acidified molybdate which then is partitioned into the isobutanol phase, while P<sub>o</sub> remains in the aqueous phase. The solution ratios applied were 1.5 mL extract plus 1.5 mL acidified molybdate, 3 mL isobutanol and 3 mL Milli-Q water. In all P fractions (P<sub>o</sub> and P<sub>i</sub> of each, P<sub>soil</sub> and P<sub>mic</sub>) as well as in unfractionated P<sub>soil</sub> and P<sub>mic</sub> extracts after acidification by addition of 10% (v/v) 2.75 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, <sup>33</sup>P was quantified <italic>via</italic> liquid scintillation counting after addition of Ultima Gold Scintillation cocktail (10:1 and 16:1 liquid scintillation cocktail to sample ratio for isobutanol and aqueous samples, respectively) using a Tri-Carb1600-TR counter (Packard, PerkinElmer). To separate high molecular weight (HMW) and low molecular weight (LMW) fractions in the nucleic acid treatments, 1.5 mL of the P<sub>soil</sub> extract was centrifuged through Amicon Ultra - 2 mL Centrifugal Filters (3 kDa molecular weight cut-off) for 90&#xa0;min (6500&#xa0;g, 15&#xb0;C). The ultrafiltrate was then readjusted to 1.5 mL and rejoined the common workflow before isobutanol fractionation, whereas the concentrate was directly measured by liquid scintillation counting. Technical recoveries of added <sup>33</sup>P without soil were run in triplicates for all substrates (200 &#xb5;L organic and inorganic <sup>33</sup>P substrates added to 20 mL 0.5 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub>), in order to assess their behavior during isobutanol fractionation and to measure recoveries by 0.5 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub> extraction. To avoid potential contamination of P<sub>i</sub> in the isobutanol phase with extracted phospholipids, 2.5 mL of P<sub>soil</sub> and P<sub>mic</sub> of the PL treatment were briefly mixed with 1 mL of CHCl<sub>3</sub> and phases were separated before isobutanol fractionation of the aqueous phase.</p>
<p>Concentrations of P<sub>i</sub> were measured colorimetrically in the isobutanol P<sub>i</sub> fractions by applying the molybdenum-blue method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>), and in P<sub>soil</sub> and P<sub>mic</sub> after acidification with 2.75 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> (10% (v/v)) by using the malachite-green method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>). Total dissolved P (TDP) was also quantified by the malachite-green method after digestion of P<sub>o</sub> in P<sub>soil</sub> and P<sub>mic</sub> with 5% (v/v) acidic persulfate (0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> + 0.5 M Na<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>8</sub>, autoclaved at 121&#xb0;C for 60&#xa0;min). P<sub>o</sub> concentrations were then calculated as difference between TDP and P<sub>i</sub>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Calculations and statistical analysis</title>
<p>All measured <sup>33</sup>P activities were corrected for radioactive decay. Technical recoveries showed that large organic molecules do not partition into the aqueous P<sub>o</sub> fraction during isobutanol fractionation, but are precipitated at the interlayer between the two phases. The aqueous fraction of the isobutanol fractionation therefore does not represent the entire <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> fraction. For this reason, in the treatments with TA, PL and SOP, we calculated the activity of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> in soil as <sup>33</sup>P<sub>soil</sub> (<italic>i.e.</italic> total <sup>33</sup>P in P<sub>soil</sub> - extract before isobutanol fractionation) minus <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub>, and similarly the activity of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> in the microbial pool as <sup>33</sup>P<sub>mic</sub> (<italic>i.e.</italic> total <sup>33</sup>P in P<sub>mic</sub> extract before isobutanol fractionation) minus <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub>. In the treatment with inorganic P, the <sup>33</sup>P activities in the P<sub>i</sub> and P<sub>o</sub> fraction of soil were proportionally fitted to P<sub>soil</sub> (<italic>i.e.</italic> total <sup>33</sup>P in P<sub>soil</sub> extract before isobutanol fractionation). In the nucleic acid treatments, the <sup>33</sup>P activities in the P<sub>i</sub> and P<sub>o</sub> fraction of soil were proportionally fitted to P<sub>soil</sub> minus P in the HMW fraction (<italic>i.e.</italic> total <sup>33</sup>P in P<sub>soil</sub> - extract before isobutanol fractionation minus <sup>33</sup>P in HMW-NA fraction). This is because <sup>33</sup>P in the concentrate of the ultrafiltration was quantified directly without undergoing isobutanol fractionation, and therefore was not affected by the bias arising through interlayer precipitation. <sup>33</sup>P recoveries in the different organic and inorganic fractions of P<sub>soil</sub> and P<sub>mic</sub> were calculated relative to the decay-adjusted technical recoveries, and specific activities (SA) of the P<sub>o</sub> pools were calculated as Bq &#xb5;g<sup>-1</sup> P<sub>o</sub>-P using the P<sub>o</sub> concentrations obtained with acidic persulfate digestion and subsequent malachite-green quantification.</p>
<p>We calculated the degree of the mineralization of <sup>33</sup>P labelled P<sub>o</sub>-substrates as the percentage of soil extractable <sup>33</sup>P present in inorganic form. This calculation was done for each time point and all five <sup>33</sup>P-labelled organic substrates and is subsequently referred to as the degree of substrate mineralization. This measure informs on the form (P<sub>o</sub> vs. P<sub>i</sub>) of available P (derived from the <sup>33</sup>P-labelled substrate) in the extractable soil pool.</p>
<p>We estimated the biosynthesis of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> from <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> taken up for all organic treatments, based on our observations of P<sub>o</sub> biosynthesis in the P<sub>i</sub> treatments. For this, we assumed that the microbial communities of each soil allocate a fixed percentage of the available amendment-derived P<sub>i</sub> into intracellular P<sub>o</sub> biosynthesis. Based on the values from the P<sub>i</sub> treatment, we calculated this percentage for each soil and time point as the microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> activity over the soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> activity *100. To calculate the activities of <sup>33</sup>P invested into biosynthesis for each soil, time point and treatment, we multiplied the observed soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> activities in the organic treatments with this factor. Finally, microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> was corrected for biosynthesis by subtraction of this activity, and to obtain <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratios of cumulative <sup>33</sup>P uptake, the same activity was added to microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub>. By basing these calculations for each treatment and time point on the actual measured soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> activities, the estimate of P<sub>o</sub> biosynthesis from P<sub>i</sub> with this method accounts for P<sub>i</sub> sorption over time, extracellular substrate mineralization and P<sub>i</sub> contaminations of the added substrates.</p>
<p>All statistical analyses were performed with R statistical software (R 3.5.2). Phosphatase activities and <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> recoveries (P<sub>i</sub> treatment, at 0&#xa0;h and 10&#xa0;h autoclaved) were compared between the soils with either Student`s t-Test or Welch`s t-Test after testing homogeneity of variance with the Bartlett test. After testing the assumption of variance homogeneity with Levene&#x2019;s tests, ANOVA was performed to test whether soil P<sub>i</sub> or TDP pools changed after substrate addition. <italic>Post-hoc</italic>-tests (Fisher&#x2019;s least significant difference test) were applied to test for pair-wise differences between the treatments and native pool sizes. After testing the assumption of variance homogeneity with Levene&#x2019;s tests, two-way-ANOVA was applied to test for differences in extraction efficiencies between the two soils and the six substrates. Linear regression was applied to the <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratios of microbes versus the degree of substrate mineralization of extractable soil P for all organic substrates in both soils. The assumption of heteroscedasticity of the models was tested with the Breusch-Pagan test, and in case of violation weighted least squares regression was applied, using the inverse of the fitted values as weights. We tested for differences in the dynamics of the labelled substrates between the soils, and for changes of <sup>33</sup>P recovery over time. For this, we applied factorial repeated measures ANOVA to the <sup>33</sup>P recoveries of all pools, using the R-package &#x201c;ez&#x201d;. The assumption of sphericity was tested with the Mauchley&#x2019;s test, and in case of violation Greenhouse-Geisser (GG) adjustment was applied. Significant outliers from the time series were identified with Grubb`s test.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>General observations about the experimental design</title>
<p>The addition of organic <sup>33</sup>P substrates only caused negligible changes in extractable soil P<sub>i</sub> (-8.8% to + 6.3%) and P<sub>o</sub> (+ 0.8% to + 77.3%) concentrations relative to the P<sub>i</sub> treatment (no &#x2018;spike&#x2019;, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S2</bold>
</xref>). This means that soil P concentrations of the treatments were similar to natural <italic>in situ</italic> conditions. More specifically, after <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> substrate additions (at time point zero), only the extractable soil P<sub>o</sub> pool of the pasture soil varied significantly between treatments (ANOVA, p-value &lt; 0.05), increasing by 1%-77% relative to unamended controls, i.e. reaching 101% to 177% of the native P<sub>o</sub> pool. Addition of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> substrate neither affected extractable soil P<sub>i</sub> pools in pasture (ANOVA, p-value = 0.34) nor in arable (ANOVA, p-value = 0.58) soils.</p>
<p>Mineralization, uptake and immobilization processes of the applied <sup>33</sup>P compounds took place very rapidly, within the first 2 to 4&#xa0;h of incubation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), and markedly slowed down afterwards. This shows that the short observation period of 24&#xa0;h was suitable to observe trends in the decomposition of the various P<sub>o</sub> substrates, while minimizing the potential effect of intesa PC10 ndelay po ang response ng pc rfering longer-term processes such as remineralization and microbial turnover.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Recoveries of experimentally added <sup>33</sup>P in extractable soil and microbial organic (P<sub>o</sub>) and inorganic (P<sub>i</sub>) phosphorus pools over 24&#xa0;h, showing the integrated temporal dynamics of decomposition processes, sorption and microbial P uptake for six different P compounds. <sup>33</sup>P recoveries (mean of triplicates &#xb1; S.E.) of all pools and time points are displayed as percentages of the initially added <sup>33</sup>P activity. In the nucleic acid treatments <bold>(E, F)</bold>, soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> is fractionated into low molecular weight (LMW) P<sub>o</sub> (&lt;3kDa) and high molecular weight (HMW) P<sub>o</sub> (&gt;3kDa) size classes. In all other treatments <bold>(A-D)</bold>, P<sub>o</sub> represents extracted P<sub>o</sub>, without size fractionation. In the case of TA <bold>(C)</bold> and PL <bold>(D)</bold> additions, extractable P<sub>o</sub> does not represent the intact added substrates (which are unextractable), but organic break down products. In the case of P<sub>o</sub> additions <bold>(B-F)</bold>, microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> recovery was corrected for cell internal biosynthesis of P<sub>o</sub>, as described in detail in the methods section. Pi, inorganic phosphate; TA, cell wall teichoic acids; PL, phospholipids; SOP, soluble organophosphates.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-03-1097965-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Recovery dynamics of <sup>33</sup>P in the extractable soil pool</title>
<sec id="s3_2_1">
<label>3.2.1</label>
<title>General recovery dynamics of <sup>33</sup>P in the extractable soil pool</title>
<p>The <sup>33</sup>P recovery kinetics of the amended substrates (P<sub>i</sub>, SOP, TA, PL, DNA, RNA) from soil showed differences and commonalities between the different <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> compounds as well as between the two soils (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> recoveries decreased significantly over time in all P<sub>o</sub> treatments except for TA. Soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> recoveries of the substrates and their breakdown products (except for LMW-DNA, i.e. the low molecular weight DNA fraction) differed significantly between the two soils. Further, the temporal dynamics of SOP and NA treatments were significantly different between the two soils (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). We found higher extractable soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> recoveries (from 3.4% for TA to 28.9% for SOP averaged across all time points) in the arable soil for all P<sub>o</sub> treatments. This could be caused by lower <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> sorption, and/or potentially higher extracellular mineralization activity in the arable soil as compared to the pasture soil. P<sub>i</sub> sorption, assessed as the non-extractable fraction of added <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub>, was significantly lower in arable soil (mean 51.0% &#xb1; 1.9% standard deviation (S.D.)) than in pasture soil (66.9% &#xb1; 5.9% S.D.) (Welch`s t-Test, p-value &lt; 0.05). Moreover, phosphodiesterase activity was 3-fold higher in the arable soil (Student`s t-Test, p-value &lt; 0.05) with 391 nmol pNP g<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>, whereas phosphomonoesterase activities did not differ significantly between the soils (Student`s t-Test, p-value = 0.07) with 630 nmol pNP g<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup> for the arable soil and 842 nmol pNP g<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup> for the pasture soil (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Differences of <sup>33</sup>P recovery from extractable soil and microbial organic (P<sub>o</sub>) and inorganic (P<sub>i</sub>) phosphorus pools, across time and between soils.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="center">Pool</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Cor.</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="center">Soil</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="center">Time</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="center">Soil x time</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">d.f.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">F</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">p-value</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">d.f.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">F</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">p-value</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">d.f.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">F</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">p-value</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GG</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">142.15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.60</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.55</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.60</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.90</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GG</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">967.20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.16</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mic.</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GG</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.35</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.80</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.73</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.80</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mic.</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">321.70</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.23</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">SOP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GG</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">232.48</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">177.55</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GG</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">807.81</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.50</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.86</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.50</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mic.</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.50</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">0.23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mic.</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">352.68</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.72</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">TA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.41</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.19</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">0.35</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.32</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.90</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GG</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">988.82</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">38.54</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mic.</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.46</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">0.48</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.39</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mic.</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">652.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">81.88</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.53</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">PL</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102.30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.15</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">119.72</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.93</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.93</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mic.</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GG</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.67</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.72</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mic.</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.85</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">342.12</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DNA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">61.55</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.53</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub> HMW</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GG</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.89</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub> LMW</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.63</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.50</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.68</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GG</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">812.58</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.59</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mic.</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">526.68</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.01</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mic.</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">937.57</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">111.32</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">RNA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GG</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5392.76</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.40</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub> HMW</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GG</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5237.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.32</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub> LMW</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GG</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">45.85</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.82</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Soil</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">145.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.98</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mic.</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>o</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">579.43</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.20</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Mic.</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.76</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.43</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.94</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.05</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="fnT2_2">
<p>Recoveries were tested for differences between soils, changes over time and differences in temporal dynamics between the soils. Factorial repeated measures ANOVAs were performed with the <sup>33</sup>P recovery percentages of the time points 0.5 to 24&#xa0;h, n = 3. If the assumption of sphericity was violated, Greenhouse-Geisser (GG) adjustment was applied, as indicated in the column &#x201c;Cor.&#x201d;. The respective adjusted degrees of freedom (d.f.), F and p-values are reported. TA, cell wall teichoic acids; PL, phospholipids; SOP, soluble organophosphates. Soil, extractable soil P pool; Mic., extractable microbial P pool. P-values &lt; 0.05 are bold.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_2">
<label>3.2.2</label>
<title>Recovery dynamics of soluble organophosphates in the extractable soil pool</title>
<p>In the SOP treatments, the soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> pool declined rapidly, leading to almost complete mineralization in the arable soil after 10&#xa0;h. In the pasture soil, mineralization slowed down after 4&#xa0;h as indicated by the time kinetics of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> formation from <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>, reaching P<sub>i</sub> recovery values of 8.8% (&#xb1; 0.3% S.D.) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_3">
<label>3.2.3</label>
<title>Recovery dynamics of teichoic acids and phospholipids in the extractable soil pool</title>
<p>In the case of TA and PL additions, extractable soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> continued to decline over the course of 24&#xa0;h, with a slowdown after 2 to 4&#xa0;h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2C, D</bold>
</xref>). In both treatments, only a small fraction of the applied <sup>33</sup>P was recovered in soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> (1.3% for TA and 16.2% for PL, averaged across both soils at 0&#xa0;h), and this pool did not change significantly over time when TA was added, while it significantly declined in the PL treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). TA and PL are phosphodiesters which contain subunits of glycerophosphate. Both phosphodiester compounds are not directly extractable with NaHCO<sub>3</sub> as such, due to the following: in the case of TA their polymeric form and covalent binding within bacterial cell walls and in the case of PL their hydrophobicity render them unextractable by NaHCO<sub>3</sub>. The labelled P<sub>o</sub> in TA and PL therefore only becomes extractable after breakdown of the compounds into smaller and water-soluble units, such as glycerol-3-phosphate. The data therefore can be assumed to show the integral of two consecutive steps in the decomposition processes of <sup>33</sup>P labelled PL and TA: breakdown to small water-soluble molecules (extractable soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>), followed by complete mineralization (to soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_4">
<label>3.2.4</label>
<title>Recovery dynamics of nucleic acids in the extractable soil pool</title>
<p>In both nucleic acid (NA) treatments (DNA and RNA), ultrafiltration was performed to separate soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> into low molecular weight-NA (&lt;3 kDa; LMW) and high molecular weight-NA (&gt;3 kDa; HMW) fractions. The LMW-fraction thus contained nucleotide monomers and small oligomers [max. 4 to 9 nucleotides, depending on the degree of hydration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">60</xref>)], whereas the HMW-fraction contained NA oligomers and polymers larger than that. Again, the data showed two steps in the decomposition process of these <sup>33</sup>P labelled compounds: <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> in the LMW-NA fraction is an indicator for breakdown of HMW compounds into oligonucleotides and mononucleotides, and soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> is a measure for complete mineralization of the added <sup>33</sup>P-NA by phosphomonoesterases. In both soils, recovery of HMW-<sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> decreased significantly (from 51.6% at 0&#xa0;h to 23.7% after 24&#xa0;h, averaged across both NA treatments and both soils), while recovery of LMW-<sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> remained very low at all times without significant changes (between 1.5% at 0&#xa0;h and 0.9% after 24&#xa0;h, averaged across both NA treatments and both soils) and recovery of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> increased slowly in the arable soil and stagnated in the pasture soil (from 4.6% to 8.7% and between 2.9% and 3.9%, respectively, averaged across of both NA treatments) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2E, F</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Microbial uptake of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> and <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub>
</title>
<sec id="s3_3_1">
<label>3.3.1</label>
<title>Direct uptake of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>
</title>
<p>With the experimental approach in this study, <sup>33</sup>P derived from labelled P<sub>o</sub>-substrates can be traced into the extractable organic fraction of the microbial biomass pool (P<sub>mic</sub>). However, <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> in P<sub>mic</sub> can stem from direct uptake of intact P<sub>o</sub> forms (pathway 1) and from extracellular <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> mineralization to <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub>, followed by cellular <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> uptake and subsequent intracellular <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> biosynthesis (pathway 2). To disentangle the source of measured intracellular <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> between both pathways, we estimated intracellular <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> biosynthesis using incubations with <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> addition. Only a small amount of <sup>33</sup>P was recovered in the microbial P<sub>o</sub> pools of these control treatments (0 to 2.5%, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>), indicating that cell internal biosynthesis of extractable P<sub>o</sub> during the 24&#xa0;h incubation period was limited. To correct microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> pools of the P<sub>o</sub> treatments for intracellular P<sub>o</sub> biosynthesis, we assumed that microbes allocated a fixed percentage (as observed in the <sup>33</sup>Pi additions) of the available substrate-derived P<sub>i</sub> into biosynthesis. While strong increases of available P<sub>i</sub> could theoretically change microbial P metabolism <italic>via</italic> induction of P<sub>i</sub> assimilation or formation of polyphosphates, this should not have been triggered in our treatments. After substrate addition, soil P<sub>i</sub> concentrations in the P<sub>o</sub> treatments did not differ significantly from the P<sub>i</sub> treatments (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S2</bold>
</xref>), supporting the assumption that microbial P metabolism was comparable between treatments. The observation of microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> that remains after accounting for P<sub>o</sub> biosynthesis from P<sub>i</sub> in all treatments thus indicates direct uptake of intact <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> compounds into the microbial biomass.</p>
<p>Biosynthesis-corrected recoveries in the microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> pool after 24&#xa0;h are therefore indicative for direct uptake of intact <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> compounds into the soil microbial biomass. They ranged between 0.7% (&#xb1; 0.2% S.D.) for TA in the arable soil and 9.6% (&#xb1; 2.0% S.D.) for RNA in the pasture soil. Biosynthesis-corrected recoveries of <sup>33</sup>P in the microbial P<sub>o</sub>-pool were significantly lower in arable (SOP: 2.4%, TA: 1.2%, PL: 4.4%, DNA: 2.8%, RNA: 1.0%, averaged across all time points) than in pasture soil (SOP: 3.0%, TA: 1.5%, PL: 5.5%, DNA: 5.8%, RNA: 9.4%, averaged across all time points), except for the SOP treatment which did not differ significantly between soils (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3_2">
<label>3.3.2</label>
<title>Temporal dynamics of microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> and <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> uptake</title>
<p>In the SOP and NA treatments, the temporal dynamics of microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> recoveries varied significantly between the soils. Across soils the temporal changes of microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> recoveries were not significant in the TA, PL and SOP treatments. In the SOP and NA treatments, extractable microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> recoveries increased rapidly initially and then remained stable (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2B-F</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratio of P<sub>mic</sub> is an indicator for the amount of substrate-derived P<sub>o</sub> that is directly taken up into microbial biomass relative to the amount of substrate-derived P<sub>o</sub> that is taken up as P<sub>i</sub> after external mineralization. The ratio is calculated for successive timesteps (0.5 to 24&#xa0;h), based on timestep-integrated and biosynthesis-corrected <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> and <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> recoveries. In the arable soil, microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratios were lower than in the pasture soil (0.68 compared to 2.86, averaged across all P<sub>o</sub> treatments and all considered time points). However, three potential methodological problems need to be considered: (i) Intracellular dephosphorylation of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> causes an increase in <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> and a decrease in this ratio, underestimating intact P<sub>o</sub> uptake. (ii) Continued extraction of soil P<sub>i</sub> in the apparent P<sub>mic</sub> pool could lead to an overestimation of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> in P<sub>mic</sub> and a subsequent underestimation of the microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratio. (iii) On the other hand, sorption of microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> to soil during the extraction could lead to an opposite bias. As the pasture soil showed a higher P<sub>i</sub> sorption capacity (66.9% compared to 51.0% in arable soil), these unquantified processes obstruct a direct comparison of the microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratio between the soils and may skew absolute values of the ratio. However, any such affect can be assumed to be independent of incubation time, thus allowing to consider the relative temporal patterns of treatment-specific microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratios. The <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratios of P<sub>mic</sub> decreased over time for most substrates, and this decrease was significantly related to the decline of available <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> in the soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S3</bold>
</xref>). For all P<sub>o</sub> amendments we found that the microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratios were well above 0 (in many cases above 1, ranging up to 8), indicating uptake of intact P<sub>o</sub> compounds. Furthermore, the dynamics of the <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratio of P<sub>mic</sub> differed between soils (e.g. PL and TA versus NA dynamics) and between different P<sub>o</sub> treatments. The microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratio for RNA after 1&#xa0;h incubation time in pasture soil was a significant outlier (Grubb`s test, G = 1.661, p-value = 0.06) and was excluded from further analysis.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Ratios of cumulative P<sub>o</sub>:P<sub>i</sub> uptake from labelled substrates decline with progressing substrate mineralization in P<sub>soil</sub> mineralization in Psoil. , shown for the arable <bold>(A)</bold> and pasture <bold>(B)</bold> soil. Data points are the means of triplicates for time points 0.5 to 24&#xa0;h (the temporal pattern within each treatment proceeds from left to right). For both nucleic acid treatments (DNA, RNA), substrate mineralization is given for for total extractable NAs [high molecular weight (HMW) + low molecular weight (LMW)] and for the LMW fraction only. Fitted significant models are shown with 95% confidence intervals. For model descriptions, see <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S3</bold>
</xref>. Microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratios are calculated based on <sup>33</sup>P activity [Bq] and were corrected for biosynthesis to obtain the <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratio of cumulative <sup>33</sup>P uptake as explained in detail in the &#x201c;methods&#x201d; section. The degree of substrate mineralization is the percentage of extractable soil <sup>33</sup>P in inorganic form, <italic>i.e.</italic> P<sub>i</sub>. Pi = inorganic phosphate; TA, cell wall teichoic acids; PL, phospholipids; SOP, soluble organophosphates.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fsoil-03-1097965-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Decomposition dynamics of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> compounds</title>
<sec id="s4_1_1">
<label>4.1.1</label>
<title>Decomposition dynamics of teichoic acids and phospholipids</title>
<p>We observed comparable trends in the decomposition dynamics of TA and PL, which both contain P in the form of glycerophosphates, either polymeric in wall teichoic acids or linked to fatty acids in phospholipids. We found that the extractable intermediate breakdown products (<sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>) of TA and PL were mineralized to a higher degree in the arable than in the pasture soil (72.7% compared to 26.1%, averaged across both treatments and all considered time points; see the degree of substrate mineralization, x-axis in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). This suggests that depolymerization by phosphodiesterases may be the rate limiting step of TA and PL decomposition in the arable soil (high degree of substrate mineralization). In the pasture soil, either mineralization through phosphomonoesterases seems to (co)limit complete TA and PL decomposition (lower degree of substrate mineralization), or a larger amount of mineralized P may be rendered bio-unavailable through higher P<sub>i</sub> sorption as compared to the arable soil. The lack of accumulation of intermediate breakdown products in <sup>33</sup>P<sub>soil</sub> over time demonstrates that glycerophosphate is promptly consumed, either by the direct use by microbes or by rapid dephosphorylation to <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> by phosphomonoesterases, in line with earlier studies [e.g <italic>(</italic>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">62</xref>)]. The observed decomposition and mineralization of TA is in contrast with the hypothesis that teichoic acids are resistant to decomposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">63</xref>). Mechanisms for the breakdown of wall teichoic acids under P limiting conditions are known (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">64</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>), and it has also been observed that soil bacteria can produce specialized phosphodiesterases (glycerophosphodiesterases) to utilize exogenous teichoic acid as the sole P source (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">66</xref>), thereby releasing glycerol-3-phosphate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">67</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">68</xref>). Interestingly, enzymes from the same highly conserved family (glycerophosphodiesterases) are known to be involved in the breakdown of both TA and PL (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">69</xref>). We also observed rapid initial breakdown of PL, similar to Tollefson and McKercher (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">70</xref>). There are at least three alternative pathways for the first step of soil microbial breakdown of PL, all yielding different breakdown products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">71</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">73</xref>). Since we observed direct uptake of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> (see discussion below), and transporters are only known for glycerol-3-phosphate, we hypothesize that a substantial part of the PL breakdown occurred <italic>via</italic> a pathway which yields glycerophosphate, choline and fatty acids as products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">71</xref>). This pathway likely involves phospholipase D, which cleaves off the headgroup from the phospholipid (e.g. choline, ethanolamine) leaving phosphatidic acid behind, and phospholipase B (or A1 plus A2) that cleaves phosphatidic acid into two fatty acids and one glycerol-3-phosphate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">74</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">75</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_1_2">
<label>4.1.2</label>
<title>Decomposition dynamics of nucleic acids</title>
<p>The second group of compounds with commonalities in decomposition dynamics are the nucleic acids. While the <sup>33</sup>P activity recovered in HMW fractions in P<sub>soil</sub> decreased (from 51.6% to 23.7% over 24&#xa0;h, averaged across both NA treatments and both soils), the recovered activity of <sup>33</sup>P in the LMW fractions remained low (between 1.5% and 0.9% over 24&#xa0;h, averaged across both NA treatments and both soils) and the recovery of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> generally increased over time (from 3.7% to 6.3% over 24&#xa0;h, averaged across both NA treatments and both soils) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2E, F</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Intact nucleic acids (which are recovered in the HMW-NA pool) need to be broken down into nucleotides (which are recovered in the LMW-NA pool) before mineralization. Therefore, the LMW-NA pool reflects the net product of inputs <italic>via</italic> HMW-NA breakdown and outputs due to mineralization and microbial uptake (and sorption). There is a constant flux of <sup>33</sup>P through the LMW-NA pool, as nucleotides are the intermediate product between depolymerization and mineralization. The constant and low recoveries of LMW-<sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2E, F</bold>
</xref>) therefore strongly indicate that substrate-derived nucleotides do not accumulate. This means that NA depolymerization to free nucleotides and oligonucleotides is the rate-limiting step in the decomposition of nucleic acids in soil, while dephosphorylation of phosphomonoesters (nucleotides) occurs rapidly and therefore is not rate limiting. Extracellular DNA in soil is thought to be cleaved into duplex oligonucleotides of 400 bp length by restriction endonucleases; studies in pure culture showed cleavage of HMW-DNA to oligonucleotides of ~7 bp likely by endonucleases and further hydrolysis <italic>via</italic> exonucleases into mononucleotides by DNases, although this has not yet been shown <italic>in situ</italic> in soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">76</xref>). Others observed that fragmentation dynamics during DNA decomposition varied between different soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">77</xref>). While it is still not clear which phosphodiesterases of the different nuclease types are involved in soil NA decomposition and who produces those in soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">77</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">79</xref>), our findings are in line with earlier observations. Phosphodiesterase activity was previously found to be rate-limiting in labile P<sub>o</sub> turnover in pasture soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">80</xref>), and other studies reported rapid mineralization of free added nucleotides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">81</xref>). It has been implied that RNA can be used as a viability marker as it degrades more rapidly in soils in comparison with DNA, although comparable half-lives of 0.5 - 1.5 days of DNA and RNA in soils have also been reported previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">82</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">84</xref>). In this study, we found similar recovery dynamics of HMW-DNA and HMW-RNA within each soil, pointing to similar decomposition rates of environmental DNA and RNA.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_1_3">
<label>4.1.3</label>
<title>Decomposition dynamics of soluble organophosphates</title>
<p>Recovery of intact organophosphates (SOP) from P<sub>soil</sub> decreased rapidly (58.2% to 13.4% over the first 4&#xa0;h, averaged across both soils), initially with concomitant but moderate increases in the soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> pool (18.7% to 21.6% over the first 4&#xa0;h, averaged across both soils). The SOP substrate presumably consisted mostly of phosphomonoesters (sugar phosphates, organic acid phosphates, nucleotides, nucleotide sugars, cofactors etc.), which are likely to be rapidly mineralized in soil by the ubiquitous acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterases. However, after one hour <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> in P<sub>soil</sub> also started to decrease, with continued decreases in <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>. This indicates that other processes aside from mineralization must have contributed to the <sup>33</sup>P removal from P<sub>soil</sub>. Patterns of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> recovery resembled those observed in the P<sub>i</sub> treatments and were thus likely caused by sorption of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> and by microbial uptake. However, it is unlikely that sorption played a large role in the observed <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> decreases, since another study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">81</xref>) found very rapid completion &#x2013; within 15 to 45 minutes &#x2013; of sorption processes of small phosphate monoesters in an Eutric Cambisol under meadow. It has been proposed that sorption dynamics of P<sub>o</sub> compounds depend on the size and structure of their organic moieties, which have lower surface affinities than phosphate groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">85</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">87</xref>). Small molecules as in the SOP treatment may therefore exhibit comparatively rapid initial sorption upon addition to soil because the effect of the organic moieties over the phosphate groups may be less dominant due to their small size. In addition, phosphate monoesters also have a high ability to form insoluble complexes with polyvalent cations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">86</xref>). The same study which observed rapid completion of initial sorption of phosphate monoesters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">81</xref>) found rapid initial mineralization and respiratory utilization of <sup>14</sup>C-labelled glucose-6-phosphate and adenosine phosphates, gradually slowing down after 6 and 24&#xa0;h, respectively. Two studies using <sup>14</sup>C and <sup>33</sup>P labelling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>) also found rapid utilization of glucose-6-phosphate, with no more major changes in <sup>33</sup>P recovery after 2 to 3 days. Another possible explanation could be rapid uptake of <sup>33</sup>P, and assimilation into non-extractable P<sub>mic</sub>. <sup>33</sup>P that is used to build up structures that are embedded in macromolecules (<italic>e.g.</italic> teichoic acids in cell walls) or that are hydrophobic (<italic>e.g.</italic> phospholipids) may not be extractable anymore with the methods applied in this study. Assimilation of labelled substrate into non-extractable microbial pools has been observed previously elsewhere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">88</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Direct microbial uptake of P<sub>o</sub> versus uptake of P<sub>i</sub> after extracellular mineralization</title>
<sec id="s4_2_1">
<label>4.2.1</label>
<title>Direct uptake of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> in general</title>
<p>The low microbial P<sub>o</sub> biosynthesis in soils amended with P<sub>i</sub> clearly points to intermittent storage (e.g. polyphosphates) and slow metabolism of P<sub>i</sub> in the soil microbial communities, showing a decoupling of uptake and metabolism of P<sub>i</sub>. Direct P<sub>o</sub> uptake contributed to <sup>33</sup>P uptake in all P<sub>o</sub> treatments, and in both soils (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The contribution of direct P<sub>o</sub> uptake to cumulative <sup>33</sup>P uptake into P<sub>mic</sub> seemed lower in the arable than in the pasture soil (with a <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratio of P<sub>mic</sub> of 0.68 compared to 2.86, averaged across all P<sub>o</sub> treatments and all considered time, see also <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). This could eventually be caused by a higher sorptive loss of microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> during extraction in the pasture soil. However, the arable soil also had a 4-fold higher native extractable P<sub>i</sub> concentration than the pasture soil (30.7 &#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup> compared to 7.0 &#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup>, see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), and a higher percentage of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>soil</sub> was present as P<sub>i</sub> (72.7% compared to 26.1%, averaged across both treatments and all considered time points, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Both these aspects render a real difference between the soils plausible. The <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratios of P<sub>mic</sub> decreased in both soils, as the progression of extracellular substrate mineralization over 24&#xa0;h decreased <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> availability through substrate consumption and concomitantly increased <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Direct P<sub>o</sub> uptake therefore decreases with observational time due to the continuous action of the phosphomonoesterases converting <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> to <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i.</sub> Hence, these patterns reveal that the P<sub>o</sub> : P<sub>i</sub> ratio of cumulative uptake of P<sub>o</sub>-derived P is ultimately governed by the form in which it is available. This actually causes a situation in soils where microbial P<sub>o</sub> uptake transporters compete with extracellular phosphomonoesterases for organic substrates. Direct uptake of organic P may be of greater relative (and absolute) importance under conditions of low P<sub>i</sub> availability, regardless of whether low P<sub>i</sub> availability is caused by lower extracellular mineralization or higher P<sub>i</sub> sorption.</p>
<p>The observed stagnation of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> accumulation in P<sub>mic</sub> of the TA, PL and SOP treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>) is likely to be the net result of several (possible) processes: (i) <italic>In situ</italic> production and decomposition of unlabelled P<sub>o</sub> compounds in P<sub>soil</sub>, contributing to a decrease in the specific activities of soil P<sub>o</sub> pools (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S2</bold>
</xref>), thus leading to a decline in net <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> accumulation at constant P<sub>o</sub> uptake rates, (ii) intracellular P<sub>o</sub> mineralization decreasing the microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> recoveries, and (iii) the intracellular production of insoluble (non-extractable) <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> diesters. For instance, another study found that labelled DNA, which was cleaved and then assimilated by bacterioplankton, became non-extractable with time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">88</xref>). Overall, the above mentioned processes would contribute to an underestimation of direct P<sub>o</sub> uptake in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2_2">
<label>4.2.2</label>
<title>Direct uptake of nucleic acids</title>
<p>It is commonly thought that NA-derived P cannot be taken up in an intact organic-bound form (<italic>i.e.</italic> nucleotide). Rather it is thought that nucleotides are first dephosphorylated, and that P-free nucleosides and P<sub>i</sub> are taken up independently by nucleoside transporters and PHT transporters, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">89</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">90</xref>). Empirical evidence for direct uptake of intact LMW nucleotides in non-parasitic organisms is scarce (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">91</xref>), but recently transporters of the nucleotide transport protein (NTT) family, previously known from intracellular parasites, have been found in free-living prokaryotes and eukaryotes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>). NTTs either exchange nucleotides across membranes (<italic>e.g.</italic> ADP for ATP, ADP for NAD<sup>+</sup>) or are H<sup>+</sup>:nucleotide symporters allowing efficient net uptake of nucleotides. NTTs could thus play an important role in the environment, contributing to the direct uptake of NA-derived P. Alternatively to nucleotide uptake, polymeric NA, such as DNA molecules, might also be actively transported across the cell envelope and into the cytoplasm, by a process called transformation in bacterial cells. Transformation aims at DNA molecules with ranges reported from 300 bp to more than 50 kb length (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">92</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">93</xref>), and therefore would clearly relate to DNA-P<sub>o</sub> from the HMW fraction in this study. This ability is taxonomically widespread but it is unknown whether it is common in soil microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">76</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">93</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">94</xref>). Furthermore, RNA presumably cannot be taken up in intact form by any process analogous to transformation, although other studies found indications for intact uptake of HMW-RNA in yeast (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">95</xref>) and for intact, energy-dependent uptake of oligonucleotides including RNA by <italic>Candida albicans</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">96</xref>). Our data suggest that direct uptake of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> derived from DNA and RNA may have taken place <italic>via</italic> transporters for nucleotides (NTT), after decomposition of LMW-NA to oligo- and mononucleotides by exo- and endonucleases.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2_3">
<label>4.2.3</label>
<title>Direct uptake of teichoic acid and phospholipid decomposition products</title>
<p>Glycerolphosphodiesterases (GlpQ) hydrolyze wall teichoic acids and phospholipids, yielding glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) amongst other byproducts. Uptake transporters for G3P (GlpT) are well known and belong to the organophosphate:phosphate antiporter (OPA) family. Often GlpT and GlpQ are co-localized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>). Recently, a novel potential P<sub>o</sub> transporter was found in bacteria, which is a component of the phosphorus utilization system (PUS) clusters. These contain the genes of the two-component PusCD system alongside with phosphodiesterases, where PusC and D likely represent a G3P transporter and a lipoprotein cap (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>). The known diversity of G3P transporters therefore renders direct uptake of G3P likely.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2_4">
<label>4.2.4</label>
<title>Direct uptake of soluble organophosphates</title>
<p>We also observed direct uptake of P<sub>o</sub> compounds from the group of soluble organophosphates. However, in this treatment, the mineralization proceeded so rapidly that <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> uptake outpaced that of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> right from the beginning, without major changes in the <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>:<sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> ratio of P<sub>mic</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The fraction of soluble organophosphates derived from bacterial cells is a complex mixture of compounds (sugar phosphates, nucleotide sugars, nucleotides, phosphoamino acids, organic polyphosphates, phosphonates <italic>etc.</italic>) and it is possible that only some of them can be taken up directly in an intact form, depending on the presence of suitable uptake transporters. For sugar phosphates, several transporters belonging to the OPA family are known, and these have been found in a variety of bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">97</xref>). There is also evidence for direct uptake of hexose phosphates in fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">98</xref>). Another uptake system from the same family is known to transport phosphoenolpyruvate and phosphoglyceric acid into bacteria, and further transporters for several phosphonates have been characterized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2_5">
<label>4.2.5</label>
<title>Cell internal fate of directly taken up <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>
</title>
<p>In our study, the <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> taken up directly remained at least partially in organic form, showing that complete intracellular mineralization did not take place within 24&#xa0;h. The P derived from P<sub>o</sub> compounds could undergo phosphoryl transfer to ATP and enter central metabolic pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>). Shortcutting cell internal metabolic pathways would be beneficial by saving costs for associated enzymes and skipping energy requiring steps. Salvage pathways using intact nucleotides have been suggested to be an important use of extracellular DNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">76</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">93</xref>). All antiporters of the OPA family transport intermediates of the glycolytic pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99">99</xref>), <italic>e.g.</italic> glycerol-3-phosphate, an intermediate of phospholipid synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">73</xref>), which could directly contribute to the host metabolism. P<sub>o</sub> uptake <italic>via</italic> OPA antiporters, however, has been suggested to be inefficient for bacterial P nutrition, because it requires efflux of P<sub>i</sub> or P<sub>o</sub> anions in order to take up P<sub>o</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>). Similarly, many of the nucleotide transporter proteins (NTT) exchange ADP for ATP, or NAD<sup>+</sup> for ADP, serving purposes of energy gain with little net gain in P. Only a few NTTs for unidirectional proton-driven nucleotide import are known (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">100</xref>). However, efficient re-uptake of secreted P<sub>i</sub> by phosphate:H<sup>+</sup> symporters (PHT family) might allow for continuous P<sub>o</sub> uptake with net P gain. While P<sub>i</sub> uptake clearly serves P nutrition, P containing organic molecules could also be used as sources of energy and C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>) and in some cases N.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Ecological implications of direct P<sub>o</sub> uptake by microbes</title>
<p>As direct microbial uptake of P<sub>o</sub> is not perceived as an integrated component of the soil P cycle, we here consider some aspects that possibly have important ecological implications compared to complete extracellular mineralization. (i) The ability of direct uptake of P<sub>o</sub> compounds reduces the dependence of P acquisition on extracellular phosphatases, especially phosphomonoesterases, since phosphate diesters still require a certain degree of extracellular enzymatic breakdown. Firstly, the efficacy of extracellular phosphatases in soils can be reduced by suboptimal pH, or by the presence of metal ions, polyvalent anions or chelating agents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">101</xref>), condensed organic molecules (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">102</xref>), and by sorption to clay minerals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">103</xref>). Secondly, extracellular enzyme production requires an investment of N (and C), and thus, under N-limiting conditions, excretion of phosphatases may not be an adequate P acquisition strategy. N additions have been shown to enhance extracellular phosphatase activity under a wide range of conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B104">104</xref>), suggesting that microbes can allocate excess N to phosphatase enzyme production. Under N-limiting conditions direct P<sub>o</sub> uptake may be beneficial, because of reduced N investment into phosphatase production. (ii) Complete mineralization by extracellular enzymes might promote the risk of losing cleaved P<sub>i</sub> to soil P<sub>i</sub> sorption/precipitation processes. Sorption of P<sub>i</sub> can remove a considerable fraction of free P<sub>i</sub> or of mineralized P in soils, particularly in highly weathered soils with high content of Fe/Al oxyhydroxides and aluminosilicates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B105">105</xref>). Since P<sub>o</sub> sorption is weaker and slower than that of P<sub>i</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B106">106</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">107</xref>), P<sub>i</sub> becomes more rapidly inaccessible compared to P<sub>o</sub>. (iii) The general advantage of direct access to organic P substrates could also affect plant-microbe interactions, as plants and microbes compete for available P over short timescales (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B108">108</xref>). Since there is limited evidence for direct P<sub>o</sub> uptake by plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B109">109</xref>), P taken up in organic form by microbes might not be directly available to plants at any time, and microbes possessing this capability could therefore have an advantage over plants.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Methodological limitations</title>
<p>The applied methodology captures net changes in pool sizes (<sup>33</sup>P recoveries relative to the activity added) over time, and therefore does not allow conclusions on underlying gross process rates. However, extractable soil <sup>33</sup>P pools (<sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> and <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> in P<sub>soil</sub>) provide a realistic picture of biologically available P and of the involved ecologically relevant net P processes. Aside from this, it must be considered that <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> and <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> are subject to abiotic immobilization processes such as sorption to soil particles and precipitation with cations (as indicated by soil P<sub>o</sub> specific activities, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S2</bold>
</xref>). Estimates of extracellular mineralization after accounting for P<sub>i</sub> sorption indicate that mineralization of <sup>33</sup>P labelled organic substrates is likely underestimated by the quantification of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> in the extractable soil P pool (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S3</bold>
</xref>). This is caused by continuous sorption of parts of the <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> that is produced by mineralization of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> compounds. However, we argue that this ongoing sorption of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> does not confound the interpretation of the data when viewing P<sub>soil</sub> as the available P pool; it just prohibits conclusions about gross mineralization rates. As for sorption of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub>, several studies that investigated the time kinetics of sorption of organic P compounds found a rapid slowdown of sorption after the first 60&#xa0;min (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">81</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">85</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">87</xref>). According to this, losses of <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> from the extractable soil pool by sorption should strongly decline after the fast initial sorption of added <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> substrate is complete. Further, phosphomonoesters are known to have a higher affinity for complexation with cations and get more strongly stabilized by sorption than phosphodiesters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">86</xref>). To directly quantify sorption of P<sub>o</sub> compounds in soil remains an open challenge. There is yet no method for isotope pool dilution approaches or isotope exchange kinetic approaches (which are often used to assess P<sub>i</sub> sorption and the size of the bioavailable P<sub>i</sub> pool) which reliably inhibits microbial activity as well as the activity of extracellular phosphatases without affecting soil structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B110">110</xref>). However, as long as biotic mineralization of added <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> compounds cannot be reliably inhibited without affecting sorption dynamics, P<sub>o</sub> sorption dynamics in real soils remain hard to determine, and therefore empirical data on P<sub>o</sub> sorption will remain constrained to artificial abiotic systems. Because of the above mentioned processes, the observed decreases in soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> and the dynamics of soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> do not necessarily reflect biological processes alone, and gaps in the balance between apparent P<sub>o</sub> mineralization, the amount of soil <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> recovery and microbial uptake of <sup>33</sup>P can arise. Similar restrictions apply to the quantification of P<sub>o</sub> uptake; several possibilities for hidden gross fluxes of <sup>33</sup>P &#x2013; for instance incorporation into unextractable microbial P<sub>o</sub> pools or intracellular P<sub>o</sub> mineralization &#x2013; might lead to an underestimation of actual P<sub>o</sub> uptake.</p>
<p>Further uncertainty of the applied methodology comes from the unknown fate of polyphosphates during P extraction and fractionation of P<sub>i</sub> and P<sub>o</sub> from the soil. In the case of high soil P<sub>i</sub> supply, bacteria and fungi can take up P<sub>i</sub> in excess of their demand and store it in the form of inorganic polyphosphates, serving as intermittent stores for P<sub>i</sub> and energy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B111">111</xref>). The behavior of such polyphosphates during isobutanol fractionation is unknown, and polyphosphates might theoretically be partitioned into the microbial P<sub>o</sub> fraction as an artefact. However, we can safely exclude that all observed microbial <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> is polyphosphate synthesized from <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub>, as this would require that polyphosphate synthesis had not occurred in the <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> treatment, but consistently in all <sup>33</sup>P<sub>o</sub> treatments. Moreover, significant <italic>in situ</italic> synthesis of polyphosphates by soil microbes is only expected under high P<sub>i</sub> availability, while in this study substrate additions did not lead to significant changes in concentrations of available soil P<sub>i</sub> relative to the P<sub>i</sub> control treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>4.5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>We presented evidence that decomposition of all tested phosphodiester compounds (cell wall teichoic acids, phospholipids, DNA and RNA) was rate-limited by the initial breakdown step carried out by phosphodiesterases, while the resulting simple phosphomonoesters (such as nucleotides and glycerophosphates) were rapidly dephosphorylated by phosphomonoesterases in most cases. This indicates that depolymerization sets the pace for the decomposition of high molecular weight P<sub>o</sub> compounds, with phosphodiesterase-activities representing the bottleneck in P<sub>o</sub> decomposition. This study did not allow for direct quantification of the abiotic sorption of intact P<sub>o</sub> compounds. However, we could show that abiotic sorption processes strongly reduced <sup>33</sup>P<sub>i</sub> recoveries, and likely also competed with microbial uptake of P<sub>i</sub> after extracellular P<sub>o</sub> mineralization.</p>
<p>Up to date, the possibility of direct microbial uptake of P<sub>o</sub> in soils has been widely overlooked. Here we presented indications that this process occurred to a substantial extent in two agricultural soils. Thus, we showed that direct microbial uptake of P<sub>o</sub> constitutes a P-acquisition pathway in the soil P cycle that does not require complete extracellular mineralization and subsequent P<sub>i</sub> uptake. We further found that cumulative net microbial P<sub>o</sub> uptake seemed to be driven by the availability of intact phosphomonoesters. Direct P<sub>o</sub> uptake could be competing or complementary to extracellular P<sub>o</sub> mineralization, depending on whether it is subject to different or to interconnected controls. Further research will be necessary to investigate the interplay of these two pathways, to assess the quantitative importance of direct P<sub>o</sub> uptake in soil systems, and to elucidate the ecological consequences of this process. Systematic studies of the distribution of phosphatases and P<sub>o</sub> uptake transporters across the soil microbial diversity will be necessary to answer these questions. Organic P plays a central role in the P cycle of most soils, and accounting for direct microbial P<sub>o</sub> uptake and the potential of phosphodiesterase activities to control overall P<sub>o</sub> mineralization rates will substantially enhance our understanding of soil P cycling (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref> as <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Data Sheet 2</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>WW designed the experiment, DW and WW developed the methods with contributions from YH. DW, JP and DZ conducted the laboratory work, DW analyzed the data, and DW and WW interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript with contributions from MM. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>We are grateful to the continuous support by the University of Vienna, in terms of basic funding, instruments, and lab space, without which this study would not have been possible.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We would like to thank Johann P&#xfc;sp&#xf6;k and Sabine Maringer for their support in the laboratory, and two reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript. D.W. would like to thank Sonja Reiterlehner deeply for all her support and patience.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoil.2023.1097965/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoil.2023.1097965/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_2.xlsx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.pdf" id="SF1" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_2.pdf" id="SF2" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_3.pdf" id="SF3" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>YP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Law</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pak</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences.</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>7</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<page-range>2261&#x2013;82</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-7-2261-2010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kattge</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>D&#xed;az</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lavorel</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prentice</surname> <given-names>IC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leadley</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xf6;nisch</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>TRY - a global database of plant traits: TRY - a GLOBAL DATABASE OF PLANT TRAITS</article-title>. <source>Glob Change Biol</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>17</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<page-range>2905&#x2013;35</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thornton</surname> <given-names>PE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Post</surname> <given-names>WM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems: Global soil microbial biomass c, n and p</article-title>. <source>Glob Ecol Biogeogr</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>22</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<page-range>737&#x2013;49</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/geb.12029</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zechmeister-Boltenstern</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keiblinger</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mooshammer</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pe&#xf1;uelas</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richter</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sardans</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The application of ecological stoichiometry to plant&#x2013;microbial&#x2013;soil organic matter transformations</article-title>. <source>Ecol Monogr</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>85</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>133&#x2013;55</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/14-0777.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Condron</surname> <given-names>LM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sinaj</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fardeau</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Processes governing phosphorus availability in temperate soils</article-title>. <source>J Environ Qual</source> (<year>2000</year>) <volume>29</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010003x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>B&#xfc;nemann</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Assessment of gross and net mineralization rates of soil organic phosphorus &#x2013; a review</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>89</volume>:<fpage>82</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>98</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.06.026</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <source>Soil organic phosphorus: a review of world literature</source>. <publisher-loc>Wallingford, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CABI Publishing</publisher-name> (<year>1987</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Post</surname> <given-names>WM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus transformations as a function of pedogenesis: A synthesis of soil phosphorus data using hedley fractionation method</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences.</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>8</volume>(<issue>10</issue>):<page-range>2907&#x2013;16</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-8-2907-2011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Darch</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blackwell</surname> <given-names>MSA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hawkins</surname> <given-names>JMB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haygarth</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A meta-analysis of organic and inorganic phosphorus in organic fertilizers, soils, and water: Implications for water quality</article-title>. <source>Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>44</volume>(<issue>19</issue>):<page-range>2172&#x2013;202</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10643389.2013.790752</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reusser</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tamburini</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neal</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verel</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McLaren</surname> <given-names>TI</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The molecular size continuum of soil organic phosphorus and its chemical associations</article-title>. <source>Geoderma.</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>412</volume>:<fpage>115716</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115716</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reusser</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Piccolo</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vinci</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Savarese</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cangemi</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cozzolino</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus species in sequentially extracted soil organic matter fractions</article-title>. <source>Geoderma.</source> (<year>2023</year>) <volume>429</volume>:<fpage>116227</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116227</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Magid</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tiessen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Condron</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Dynamics of organic phosphorus in soils under natural and agricultural ecosystems</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Piccolo</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editor. <source>Humic substances in terrestrial ecosystems</source>. <publisher-loc>Amsterdam, Netherlands</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier Science B. V.</publisher-name> (<year>1996</year>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-044481516-3/50012-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joner</surname> <given-names>EJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Microbial turnover of phosphorus in soil</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldwin</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Organic phosphorus in the environment</source>. <publisher-loc>Wallingford, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CABI Publishing</publisher-name> (<year>2005</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>B&#xfc;nemann</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prusisz</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ehlers</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Characterization of phosphorus forms in soil microorganisms</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>B&#xfc;nemann</surname> <given-names>E K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Phosphorus in action, soil biology 26</source>. <publisher-loc>Heidelberg, Germany</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name> (<year>2011</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vincent</surname> <given-names>AG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schleucher</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giesler</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wardle</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Soil phosphorus forms show only minor changes across a 5000-year-old boreal wildfire chronosequence</article-title>. <source>Biogeochemistry.</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>159</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10533-022-00910-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Achat</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Augusto</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gallet-Budynek</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Loustau</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Future challenges in coupled c&#x2013;N&#x2013;P cycle models for terrestrial ecosystems under global change: a review</article-title>. <source>Biogeochemistry.</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>131</volume>(<issue>1&#x2013;2</issue>):<fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>202</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10533-016-0274-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Helfenstein</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jegminat</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McLaren</surname> <given-names>TI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Soil solution phosphorus turnover: derivation, interpretation, and insights from a global compilation of isotope exchange kinetic studies</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences.</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>15</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<page-range>105&#x2013;14</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-15-105-2018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wanek</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zezula</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wasner</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mooshammer</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prommer</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A novel isotope pool dilution approach to quantify gross rates of key abiotic and biological processes in the soil phosphorus cycle</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>16</volume>(<issue>15</issue>):<page-range>3047&#x2013;68</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-16-3047-2019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Augusto</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goll</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Helfenstein</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Toward a global model for soil inorganic phosphorus dynamics: Dependence of exchange kinetics and soil bioavailability on soil physicochemical properties</article-title>. <source>Glob Biogeochem Cycles</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>36</volume>(<issue>3</issue>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2021GB007061</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cade-Menun</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>CW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tremblay</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Long-term land use affects phosphorus speciation and the composition of phosphorus cycling genes in agricultural soils</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<elocation-id>1643</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.01643</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ou</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Remarkable effects of microbial factors on soil phosphorus bioavailability: A country-scale study</article-title>. <source>Glob Change Biol</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>3;gcb</volume>:<fpage>16213</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.16213</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Siles</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Starke</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martinovic</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parente Fernandes</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orgiazzi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bastida</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Distribution of phosphorus cycling genes across land uses and microbial taxonomic groups based on metagenome and genome mining</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>174</volume>:<fpage>108826</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108826</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>AE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simpson</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability update on microbial phosphorus</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>156</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>989&#x2013;96</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.175448</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>George</surname> <given-names>TS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giles</surname> <given-names>CD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Menezes-Blackburn</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Condron</surname> <given-names>LM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gama-Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaisi</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Organic phosphorus in the terrestrial environment: a perspective on the state of the art and future priorities</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>427</volume>(<issue>1&#x2013;2</issue>):<fpage>191</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>208</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-017-3391-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Nucleases: diversity of structure, function and mechanism</article-title>. <source>Q Rev Biophys</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>44</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0033583510000181</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lidbury</surname> <given-names>IDEA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>ARJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fraser</surname> <given-names>TD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bending</surname> <given-names>GD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>AME</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Identification of extracellular glycerophosphodiesterases in pseudomonas and their role in soil organic phosphorus remineralisation</article-title>. <source>Sci Rep</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>7</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>2179</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-02327-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Walter</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Unsleber</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rismondo</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jorge</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peschel</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gr&#xfc;ndling</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phosphoglycerol-type wall and lipoteichoic acids are enantiomeric polymers differentiated by the stereospecific glycerophosphodiesterase GlpQ</article-title>. <source>J Biol Chem</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>295</volume>(<issue>12</issue>):<page-range>4024&#x2013;34</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.RA120.012566</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nannipieri</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giagnoni</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Landi</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Renella</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Role of phosphatase enzymes in soil</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>B&#xfc;nemann</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oberson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Phosphorus in action, soil biology 26</source>. <publisher-loc>Heidelberg, Germany</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name> (<year>2011</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schimel</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bennett</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>NITROGEN MINERALIZATION: CHALLENGES OF a CHANGING PARADIGM</article-title>. <source>Ecology.</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>85</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>591</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>602</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/03-8002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jan</surname> <given-names>MT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tonheim</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Protein breakdown represents a major bottleneck in nitrogen cycling in grassland soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>41</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<page-range>2272&#x2013;82</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.08.013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wanek</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mooshammer</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bl&#xf6;chl</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hanreich</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richter</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Determination of gross rates of amino acid production and immobilization in decomposing leaf litter by a novel 15N isotope pool dilution technique</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>2010</year>) <volume>42</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<page-range>1293&#x2013;302</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noll</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wanek</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Direct measurement of the <italic>in situ</italic> decomposition of microbial-derived soil organic matter</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>141</volume>:<fpage>107660</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107660</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Labile organic phosphorus mineralization in relationship to soil properties</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>1982</year>) <volume>14</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>343&#x2013;51</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(82)90004-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jayachandran</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwab</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hetricic</surname> <given-names>BAD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Mineralization of organic phosphorus by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>1992</year>) <volume>24</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<fpage>897</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>903</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(92)90012-M</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>JK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cartwright</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The comparative plant availability of <sup>32</sup> p <italic>myo</italic> -inositol hexaphospha.te and KH <sub>2</sub> <sup>32</sup> PO <sub>4</sub> added to soils</article-title>. <source>Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal</source> (<year>1971</year>) <volume>2</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<page-range>375&#x2013;81</page-range>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Spohn</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuzyakov</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus mineralization can be driven by microbial need for carbon</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>61</volume>:<fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.02.013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heuck</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weig</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spohn</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Soil microbial biomass C:N:P stoichiometry and microbial use of organic phosphorus</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>85</volume>:<page-range>119&#x2013;29</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.029</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kapoor</surname> <given-names>KK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haider</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Mineralization and plant availability of phosphorus from biomass of hyaline and melanic fungi</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J</source> (<year>1982</year>) <volume>46</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<page-range>953&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600050014x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van Veen</surname> <given-names>HW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phosphate transport in prokaryotes: molecules, mediators and mechanisms</article-title>. <source>Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek</source> (<year>1997</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<page-range>299&#x2013;315</page-range>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>AE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>George</surname> <given-names>TS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hens</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simpson</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Utilization of soil organic phosphorus by higher plants</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldwin</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Organic phosphorus in the environment</source>. <publisher-loc>Wallingford, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CABI Publishing</publisher-name> (<year>2005</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Solhtalab</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thongsomboon</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aristilde</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Strategies of organic phosphorus recycling by soil bacteria: acquisition, metabolism, and regulation</article-title>. <source>Environ Microbiol Rep</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>14</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1758-2229.13040</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Beever</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burns</surname> <given-names>DJW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus uptake, storage and utilization by fungi</article-title>. In: <source>Advances in botanical research.</source> <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press INC</publisher-name>). (<year>1981</year>) <fpage>127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>219</lpage>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065229608600348">https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065229608600348</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Major</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Embley</surname> <given-names>TM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>TA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phylogenetic diversity of NTT nucleotide transport proteins in free-living and parasitic bacteria and eukaryotes</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol Evol</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>9</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>480&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gbe/evx015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Winkler</surname> <given-names>HH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Distribution of an inducible hexose-phosphate transport system among various bacteria</article-title>. <source>J Bacteriol</source> (<year>1973</year>) <volume>116</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>1079&#x2013;81</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jb.116.2.1079-1081.1973</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lidbury</surname> <given-names>IDEA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borsetto</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>ARJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bottrill</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>AME</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bending</surname> <given-names>GD</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Niche-adaptation in plant-associated bacteroidetes favours specialisation in organic phosphorus mineralisation</article-title>. <source>ISME J</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>15</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>1040&#x2013;55</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-020-00829-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maloney</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ambudkar</surname> <given-names>SV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sonna</surname> <given-names>LA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varadhachary&#x2019;</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Anion-exchange mechanisms in bacteria</article-title>. <source>Microbiol Rev</source> (<year>1990</year>) <volume>54</volume>:<fpage>17</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mr.54.1.1-17.1990</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lemieux</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>DN</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Glycerol-3-phosphate transporter of escherichia coli: Structure, function and regulation</article-title>. <source>Res Microbiol</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>155</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<page-range>623&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.resmic.2004.05.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wanner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus assimilation and control of the phosphate regulon</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Neidhardt</surname> <given-names>FC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Curtiss</surname> <given-names>R</given-names> <suffix>III</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ingraham</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>ECC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Low</surname> <given-names>KB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Magasanik</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Escherichia coli and salmonella: Cellular and molecular biology. American society for microbiology, ed. 2</source> . (<publisher-loc>Washington, D.C</publisher-loc>.: <publisher-name>American Society for Microbiology Press</publisher-name>) (<year>1996</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>49</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noll</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wanek</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Environmental effects on soil microbial nitrogen use efficiency are controlled by allocation of organic nitrogen to microbial growth and regulate gross n mineralization</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>135</volume>:<page-range>304&#x2013;15</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.05.019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>50</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>WP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A micro-pipette method for soil mechanical analysis</article-title>. <source>Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal</source> (<year>1987</year>) <volume>18</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103628709367799</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<label>51</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sinsabaugh</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klug</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Collins</surname> <given-names>HP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yeager</surname> <given-names>PE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petersen</surname> <given-names>SO</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Characterizing soil microbial communities</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>GP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coleman</surname> <given-names>DC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bledsoe</surname> <given-names>CS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sollins</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research</source>. <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name> (<year>1999</year>). Available from: <uri xlink:href="https://lter.kbs.msu.edu/pub/2713">https://lter.kbs.msu.edu/pub/2713</uri>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<label>52</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tabatabai</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Soil enzymes</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Weaver</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Angle</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bottomley</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bezdicek</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tabatabai</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Methods of soil analysis part 2 microbiological and biochemical properties</source>. <publisher-loc>Madison, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Soil Science Society of America</publisher-name> (<year>1994</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<label>53</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>D&#x2019;Angelo</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crutchfield</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vandiviere</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Rapid, sensitive, microscale determination of phosphate in water and soil</article-title>. <source>J Environ Qual</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>30</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<page-range>2206&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq2001.2206</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<label>54</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rowland</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haygarth</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Determination of total dissolved phosphorus in soil solutions</article-title>. <source>J Environ Qual</source> (<year>1997</year>) <volume>26</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>410&#x2013;5</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600020011x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<label>55</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brookes</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Powlson</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jenkinson</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>1982</year>) <volume>14</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>319&#x2013;29</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(82)90001-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<label>56</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Quiquampoix</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mousain</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Enzymatic hydrolysis of organic phosphorus</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldwin</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Organic phosphorus in the environment</source>. <publisher-loc>Wallingford, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CABI Publishing</publisher-name> (<year>2005</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<label>57</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Amadou</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faucon</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Houben</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>New insights into sorption and desorption of organic phosphorus on goethite, gibbsite, kaolinite and montmorillonite</article-title>. <source>Appl Geochem</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>143</volume>:<fpage>105378</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105378</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<label>58</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jayachandran</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwab</surname> <given-names>AP</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Hetrick BAD. partitioning dissolved inorganic and organic phosphorus using acidified molybdate and isobutanol</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J</source> (<year>1992</year>) <volume>56</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>762&#x2013;5</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(92)90012-M</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<label>59</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mooshammer</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wanek</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schnecker</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wild</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leitner</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hofhansl</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Stoichiometric controls of nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in decomposing beech leaf litter</article-title>. <source>Ecology.</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>93</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>770&#x2013;82</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/11-0721.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<label>60</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Corbridge</surname> <given-names>DEC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <source>Phosphorus: Chemistry, biochemistry and technology, sixth edition</source>. <publisher-loc>Boca Raton, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CRC Press</publisher-name> (<year>2013</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<label>61</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bowman</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cole</surname> <given-names>CV</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Transformations of organic phosphorus substrates in soils evaluated by NaHCO3 extraction</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci</source> (<year>1978</year>) <volume>125</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<page-range>49&#x2013;54</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00010694-197801000-00008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<label>62</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Drobn&#xed;kov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Factors influencing the determination of phosphatases in soil</article-title>. <source>Folia Microbiol (Praha)</source> (<year>1961</year>) <volume>6</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>260&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02872531</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<label>63</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mclaughlin</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alston</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phosphorus cycling in wheat-pasture rotations. III. organic phosphorus turnover and phosphorus cycling</article-title>. <source>Soil Res</source> (<year>1988</year>) <volume>26</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>343</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/SR9880343</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<label>64</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Physiology of lipoteichoic acids in bacteria</article-title>. In: <source>Advances in microbial physiology</source>. <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name> (<year>1988</year>). p. <fpage>233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>302</lpage>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065291108603495">https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065291108603495</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<label>65</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>CL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>FKK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koo</surname> <given-names>BM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>El-Halfawy</surname> <given-names>OM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>French</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gross</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Identification of two phosphate starvation-induced wall teichoic acid hydrolases provides first insights into the degradative pathway of a key bacterial cell wall component</article-title>. <source>J Biol Chem</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>291</volume>(<issue>50</issue>):<page-range>26066&#x2013;82</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M116.760447</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<label>66</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wise</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glickman</surname> <given-names>RS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Teimer</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Teichoic acid hydrolase activity in soil bacteria</article-title>. <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci</source> (<year>1972</year>) <volume>69</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<page-range>233&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.69.1.233</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<label>67</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kusser</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fiedler</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A novel glycerophosphodiesterase from <italic>Bacillus pumilus</italic>
</article-title>. <source>FEBS Lett</source> (<year>1984</year>) <volume>30;166</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>301&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0014-5793(84)80100-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<label>68</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jorge</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Unsleber</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mayer</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peschel</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Staphylococcus aureus counters phosphate limitation by scavenging wall teichoic acids from other staphylococci <italic>via</italic> the teichoicase GlpQ</article-title>. <source>J Biol Chem</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>293</volume>(<issue>38</issue>):<page-range>14916&#x2013;24</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.RA118.004584</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<label>69</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Corda</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mosca</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohshima</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grauso</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yanaka</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mariggi&#xf2;</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The emerging physiological roles of the glycerophosphodiesterase family</article-title>. <source>FEBS J</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>281</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>998</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1016</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/febs.12699</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<label>70</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tollefson</surname> <given-names>TS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McKercher</surname> <given-names>RB</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The degradation of 14C-labelled phosphatidyl choline in soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>1983</year>) <volume>15</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>145&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(83)90095-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<label>71</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hayaishi</surname> <given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kornberg</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Metabolism of phospholipides by bacterial enzymes</article-title>. <source>J Biol Chem</source> (<year>1954</year>) <volume>206</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>647&#x2013;63</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50833-X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<label>72</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>&#xd6;linger</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Margesin</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kandeler</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Enzymes involved in phosphorus metabolism</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Schinner</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#xd6;hliner</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kandeler</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Margesin</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Methods in soil biology</source>. (<publisher-name>Berlin</publisher-name>: <publisher-loc>Springer</publisher-loc>) (<year>1996</year>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-60966-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<label>73</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Larson</surname> <given-names>TJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ehrmann</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boos</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Periplasmic glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase of escherichia coli, a new enzyme of the glp regulon</article-title>. <source>J Biol Chem</source> (<year>1983</year>) <volume>258</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<page-range>5428&#x2013;32</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0021-9258(20)81908-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<label>74</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jorge</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Unsleber</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G&#xf6;hring</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mayer</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peschel</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Utilization of glycerophosphodiesters by <italic>Staphylococcus aureus: Staphylococcus aureus</italic> uses GPDs</article-title>. <source>Mol Microbiol</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>103</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>229&#x2013;41</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mmi.13552</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<label>75</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barman</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gohain</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bora</surname> <given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tamuli</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phospholipases play multiple cellular roles including growth, stress tolerance, sexual development, and virulence in fungi</article-title>. <source>Microbiol Res</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>209</volume>:<fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2017.12.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<label>76</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Levy-Booth</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campbell</surname> <given-names>RG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gulden</surname> <given-names>RH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hart</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Powell</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klironomos</surname> <given-names>JN</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Cycling of extracellular DNA in the soil environment</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>39</volume>(<issue>12</issue>):<page-range>2977&#x2013;91</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.06.020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<label>77</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blum</surname> <given-names>SAE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lorenz</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wackernagel</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Mechanism of retarded DNA degradation and prokaryotic origin of DNases in nonsterile soils</article-title>. <source>Syst Appl Microbiol</source> (<year>1997</year>) <volume>20</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>513&#x2013;21</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0723-2020(97)80021-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<label>78</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Torti</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lever</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>J&#xf8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>BB</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Origin, dynamics, and implications of extracellular DNA pools in marine sediments</article-title>. <source>Mar Genomics</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<page-range>185&#x2013;96</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.margen.2015.08.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<label>79</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wasmund</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pelikan</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schintlmeister</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wagner</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Watzka</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richter</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Genomic insights into diverse bacterial taxa that degrade extracellular DNA in marine sediments</article-title>. <source>Nat Microbiol</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>6</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<page-range>885&#x2013;98</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41564-021-00917-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<label>80</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haygarth</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phosphatase activity in temperate pasture soils: Potential regulation of labile organic phosphorus turnover by phosphodiesterase activity</article-title>. <source>Sci Total Environ</source> (<year>2005</year>) <volume>344</volume>(<issue>1&#x2013;3</issue>):<fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.02.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<label>81</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fransson</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phosphatase activity does not limit the microbial use of low molecular weight organic-p substrates in soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol Biochem</source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>39</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<page-range>1213&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.11.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<label>82</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pietramellara</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ascher</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borgogni</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ceccherini</surname> <given-names>MT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guerri</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nannipieri</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Extracellular DNA in soil and sediment: fate and ecological relevance</article-title>. <source>Biol Fertil Soils</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>45</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>219&#x2013;35</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-008-0345-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<label>83</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dubelman</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zapata</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huizinga</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uffman</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Environmental fate of double-stranded RNA in agricultural soils</article-title>. <source>Smagghe G editor PloS One</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>9</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<elocation-id>e93155</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0093155</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<label>84</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kunadiya</surname> <given-names>MB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burgess</surname> <given-names>TI</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dunstan</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>StJ. Hardy</surname> <given-names>GE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Persistence and degradation of <italic>Phytophthora cinnamomi</italic> DNA and RNA in different soil types</article-title>. <source>Environ DNA</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>3</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>92</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>104</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/edn3.127</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<label>85</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stewart</surname> <given-names>JWB</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Kinetics of adsorption of organic and inorganic phosphates by short-range ordered precipitate of alumnium</article-title>. <source>Can J Soil Sci</source> (<year>1990</year>) <volume>70</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>461&#x2013;70</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/cjss90-045</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<label>86</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Celi</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barberis</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Abiotic stabilization of organic phosphorus in the environment</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldwin</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Organic phosphorus in the environment</source>. (<publisher-loc>Wallingford, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CABI Publishing</publisher-name>) (<year>2005</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<label>87</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>YP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>XH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sparks</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Sorption and desorption characteristics of organic phosphates of different structures on aluminium (oxyhydr)oxides: Sorption-desorption of organic p on Al oxyhydroxides</article-title>. <source>Eur J Soil Sci</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>65</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>308&#x2013;17</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ejss.12119</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<label>88</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>J&#xf8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobsen</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Bacterial uptake and utilization of dissolved DNA</article-title>. <source>Aquat Microb Ecol</source> (<year>1996</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<page-range>263&#x2013;70</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3354/ame011263</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B89">
<label>89</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Acimovic</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coe</surname> <given-names>IR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Molecular evolution of the equilibrative nucleoside transporter family: Identification of novel family members in prokaryotes and eukaryotes</article-title>. <source>Mol Biol Evol</source> (<year>2002</year>) <volume>19</volume>(<issue>12</issue>):<page-range>2199&#x2013;210</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004044</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B90">
<label>90</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cabrita</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldwin</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Young</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cass</surname> <given-names>CE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Molecular biology and regulation of nucleoside and nucleobase transporter proteins in eukaryotes and prokaryotes</article-title>. <source>Biochem Cell Biol</source> (<year>2002</year>) <volume>80</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<page-range>623&#x2013;38</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/o02-153</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B91">
<label>91</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wickner</surname> <given-names>RB</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Mutants of <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic> that incorporate deoxythymidine-5&#x2032;-Monophosphate into deoxyribonucleic acid in vivo</article-title>. <source>J Bacteriol</source> (<year>1974</year>) <volume>117</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<page-range>252&#x2013;60</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jb.117.1.252-260.1974</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B92">
<label>92</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Finkel</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kolter</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>DNA As a nutrient: Novel role for bacterial competence gene homologs</article-title>. <source>J Bacteriol</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>183</volume>(<issue>21</issue>):<page-range>6288&#x2013;93</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.183.21.6288-6293.2001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B93">
<label>93</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mell</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Redfield</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Natural competence and the evolution of DNA uptake specificity</article-title>. <source>J Bacteriol</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>196</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<page-range>1471&#x2013;83</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.01293-13</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B94">
<label>94</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dubnau</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>DNA Uptake during bacterial transformation</article-title>. <source>Nat Rev Microbiol</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>2</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>241&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro844</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B95">
<label>95</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bloemers</surname> <given-names>HPJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koningsberger</surname> <given-names>VV</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Uptake of large molecular weights radioactive RNA by protoplasts of saccharomyces carlsbergensis</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> (<year>1967</year>) <volume>214</volume>:<page-range>487&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/214487a0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B96">
<label>96</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Disney</surname> <given-names>MD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haidaris</surname> <given-names>CG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>DH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Uptake and antifungal activity of oligonucleotides in <italic>Candida albicans</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci</source> (<year>2003</year>) <volume>18;100</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>1530&#x2013;4</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0337462100</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B97">
<label>97</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dietz</surname> <given-names>GW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The hexose phosphate transport system of escherichia coli</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Meister</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editor. <source>Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology, volume 44</source>. <publisher-loc>Hoboken, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</publisher-name> (<year>1976</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B98">
<label>98</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lyon</surname> <given-names>AJE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lucas</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The phosphorus metabolism of rhizopus stolonifer and chaetomium sp. with respect to phosphorus translocation</article-title>. <source>New Phytol</source> (<year>1969</year>) <volume>68</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>971&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.1969.tb06497.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B99">
<label>99</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Albermann</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weiner</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tr&#xf6;ndle</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weuster-Botz</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sprenger</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Utilization of organophosphate:phosphate antiporter for isotope-labeling experiments in e</article-title>. <source>coli FEMS Microbiol Lett</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>361</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>52</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1574-6968.12612</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B100">
<label>100</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haferkamp</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmitz-Esser</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wagner</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neigel</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horn</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neuhaus</surname> <given-names>HE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Tapping the nucleotide pool of the host: novel nucleotide carrier proteins of protochlamydia amoebophila</article-title>. <source>Mol Microbiol</source> (<year>2006</year>) <volume>60</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<page-range>1534&#x2013;45</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05193.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B101">
<label>101</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nash</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haygarth</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Condron</surname> <given-names>LM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McDowell</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>AE</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Using organic phosphorus to sustain pasture productivity: A perspective</article-title>. <source>Geoderma.</source> (<year>2014</year>) <volume>221&#x2013;222</volume>:<page-range>11&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.12.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B102">
<label>102</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Joanisse</surname> <given-names>GD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bradley</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Preston</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munson</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Soil enzyme inhibition by condensed litter tannins may drive ecosystem structure and processes: the case of kalmia angustifolia</article-title>. <source>New Phytol</source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>175</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>535&#x2013;46</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02113.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B103">
<label>103</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tietjen T</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wetzel</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Extracellular enzyme-clay mineral complexes: Enzyme adsorption, alteration of enzyme activity, and protection from photodegradation</article-title>. <source>Aquat Ecol</source> (<year>2003</year>) <volume>37</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<page-range>331&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/B:AECO.0000007044.52801.6b</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B104">
<label>104</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marklein</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Houlton</surname> <given-names>BZ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems</article-title>. <source>New Phytol</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>193</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>696</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>704</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03967.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B105">
<label>105</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barrow</surname> <given-names>NJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Soil phosphate chemistry and the p-sparing effect of previous phosphate applications</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>397</volume>(<issue>1&#x2013;2</issue>):<page-range>401&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-015-2514-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B106">
<label>106</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lilienfein</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qualls</surname> <given-names>RG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uselman</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bridgham</surname> <given-names>SD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Adsorption of dissolved organic and inorganic phosphorus in soils of a weathering chronosequence</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci Soc Am J</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>68</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>620&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj2004.6200</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B107">
<label>107</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Condron</surname> <given-names>LM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>BL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cade-Menun</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Chemistry and dynamics of soil organic phosphorus</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Sims</surname> <given-names>JT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharpley</surname> <given-names>AN</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Phosphorus: Agriculture and the environment agronomy 46</source>. <publisher-loc>Madison, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Soil Science Society of America, Inc.</publisher-name> (<year>2005</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B108">
<label>108</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vandecar</surname> <given-names>KL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lawrence</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oberbauer</surname> <given-names>SF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Das</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tully</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Biotic and abiotic controls on diurnal fluctuations in labile soil phosphorus of a wet tropical forest</article-title>. <source>Ecology.</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>90</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<page-range>2547&#x2013;55</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/08-1516.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B109">
<label>109</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>AE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>PR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delhaize</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>FA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Plant and microbial strategies to improve the phosphorus efficiency of agriculture</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>349</volume>(<issue>1&#x2013;2</issue>):<page-range>121&#x2013;56</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-011-0950-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B110">
<label>110</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sinaj</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The isotope exchange kinetic technique: A method to describe the availability of inorganic nutrients. applications to K, p, s and zn</article-title>. <source>Isotopes Environ Health Stud</source> (<year>1997</year>) <volume>33</volume>(<issue>1&#x2013;2</issue>):<fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10256019808036360</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B111">
<label>111</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kornberg</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>NN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ault-Rich&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Inorganic polyphosphate: A molecule of many functions</article-title>. <source>Annu Rev Biochem</source> (<year>1999</year>) <volume>37</volume>:<page-range>89&#x2013;125</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-58444-2_1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>