MINI REVIEW article

Front. Space Technol.

Sec. Space Exploration

Sleep and circadian disruption during human spaceflight: mechanisms, operational consequences, and countermeasures

  • 1. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

  • 2. Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Sleep loss and circadian misalignment are recurrent features of human spaceflight and represent an integrated threat to astronaut health, cognition, and operational performance. This narrative review examines the mechanisms that destabilize sleep in space, distinguishes sleep disturbance from clinically diagnosed sleep disorders, evaluates current countermeasures, and identifies priorities for exploration-class missions. Altered light exposure, irregular schedules, high workload, noise, constrained sleeping environments, stress, and possible microgravity-related physiological changes can disrupt coordination between circadian timing and homeostatic sleep pressure. This may result in shortened and fragmented sleep, altered sleep architecture, and insomnia-like symptoms. Evidence from shuttle, International Space Station, and analog missions associates sleep deficiency and circadian misalignment with reduced vigilance, slower psychomotor responses, increased stress, and greater medication use. Timed light, protected sleep opportunities, workload management, environmental control, strategic naps, and carefully selected pharmacological interventions offer complementary benefits, but none is sufficient alone. Long-duration missions will require individualized, multimodal fatigue-risk management integrating validated monitoring, adaptive lighting, autonomous scheduling, and conservative medication protocols. Emerging precision strategies combine wearable physiological biomarkers and research-grade multi-omics profiles with personalized chronotherapy and closed-loop environmental control, although staged validation is required before operational deployment. Key knowledge gaps concern clinically defined sleep disorders, interactions between sleep regulation and other spaceflight hazards, individual and sex-specific responses, and the durability of countermeasures during lunar and Martian missions. Sleep should therefore be treated as a mission-critical system variable rather than solely as an individual medical complaint.

Summary

Keywords

astronaut sleep, Circadian Rhythm, countermeasures, Fatigue risk management, Human spaceflight, insomnia, Long-duration missions, sleep deficiency

Received

04 August 2026

Accepted

12 August 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Baatout and Goedegebure. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Sarah Baatout

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics