AUTHOR=Zhou Shihong , Cai Deng , Chen Chunji , Luo Jizhuang , Wang Rui TITLE=Preoperative Changes of Lung Nodule on Computed Tomography and Their Relationship With Pathological Outcomes JOURNAL=Frontiers in Surgery VOLUME=Volume 9 - 2022 YEAR=2022 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.836924 DOI=10.3389/fsurg.2022.836924 ISSN=2296-875X ABSTRACT=Background

Whether changes of lung nodules on computed tomography could bring us helpful information related to their pathological outcomes remained unclear.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was carried out among 1,185 cases of lung nodules in Shanghai Chest Hospital from January 2015 to April 2017, which did not shrink or disappear after preoperative follow-up over three months. Their imaging features, changes, and clinical characteristics were collected. A separate analysis was performed in nodules with or without growth in long-axis diameter after follow-up, searching significant changes related to nodule malignancy and the median interval of follow-up for reference. Further study was performed similarly in malignant nodules for discrimination of malignant grading.

Results

Most nodules were stable (n = 885, 75%), whereas others grew (n = 300, 25%). For predicting nodule malignancy, increase in density (>10 Hounsfield units, median follow-up of 549 days) played an important role in growing group whereas it failed in stable group, and the increase in size was less significant in growing group. For discrimination of malignant grading, increase in density (>70 Hounsfield units, median follow-up of 366 days) showed its significance in stable group, and so did increase in size in growing group (maximum diameter growth >3.3 mm, median follow-up of 549 days, or average diameter growth >3.1 mm, median follow-up of 625 days).

Conclusions

There were significant changes of lung nodules by follow-up on computed tomography, related to their pathological outcomes. The predictive power of increase in density or size varied in different situations, whereas all referred to a long-time preoperative follow-up.