https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery RSS Feed for Frontiers in Surgery | New and Recent Articles en-us Frontiers Feed Generator,version:1 2026-07-08T19:49:27.249+00:00 60 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1830529 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1830529 2026-07-08T00:00:00Z Case Report Elvin Jia Hong LeeZhun Shen TanAzlanudin AzmanIsa Azzaki ZainalMuhammad Zahid Abdul MuienIan Chik https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1852407 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1852407 2026-07-08T00:00:00Z Case Report Tudor-Alexandru PopoiuDan BrebuRares BorceanAdrian VaduvaMircea Selaru https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1882426 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1882426 2026-07-08T00:00:00Z Systematic Review Jiyuan LiaoYuchen DuanYunfei LuWenjie Liu https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1897151 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1897151 2026-07-08T00:00:00Z Review Qihao ZhaoFuling SongMeimei CuiHaoping JiaRongzhan FuGuanghan WuDongsheng Zhou https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1825806 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1825806 2026-07-08T00:00:00Z Original Research Hao YaoJingqiao LiXu ZhangBin WangXuewu ZhouXiaoliang Yang  0.05), including excellent (32 vs. 33), good (14 vs. 13), and fair (0 vs. 3) results. The patient aesthetics scores were 8.8 ± 1.8 vs. 8.1 ± 1.1 (P < 0.05). The patient satisfaction scores were 8.9 ± 1.6 vs. 8.1 ± 1.2 (P < 0.05) based on the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction questionnaire.ConclusionsDepressed distal radial malunions at the distal levels can be treated via a 5 mm incision. External fixation through this small incision may be effective in maintaining radial height, especially in patients with osteoporosis. Usually, owing to a non-necessity for secondary implant removal in some patients, this technique results in acceptable outcomes in total treatment cost, total off work time, and patient satisfaction. The technique can be an alternative in addition to plate fixation. However, more factors should be considered when selecting the treatment strategy.]]> https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1835514 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1835514 2026-07-08T00:00:00Z Case Report Sui-Ling PerezRakesh R. NairNoah S. LlanerasEmily GarateixLidia SabaterRoberto A. Miki https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1852643 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1852643 2026-07-08T00:00:00Z Case Report Zeyan ChenJiancong ChenGuoliang WangZhenfeng Zhang https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1813508 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1813508 2026-07-08T00:00:00Z Perspective Eugene Rezk https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1859811 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1859811 2026-07-08T00:00:00Z Case Report Asma SghaierSabri Youssef https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1761954 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1761954 2026-07-07T00:00:00Z Original Research Yu SunGang Pu https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1807406 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1807406 2026-07-07T00:00:00Z Review Shuiwang ZhaoJiaxin LiuBei LiHaoLi ZhangRong TianShenqiao YangLi Zhu https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1868881 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1868881 2026-07-07T00:00:00Z Original Research Xin WangSihan WuMenghao WangTianhang WuXiangyu ZhengFei LiXiaowei WangZhihan HuXinyi ChenQiming ZhaoXiaoping ChenYue Chen 90 days) satisfaction scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsSixty-two implants were placed in 31 patients. The mean follow-up was 8.3 ± 2.1 months. Implant placement was successful in all cases, and no intraoperative reshaping was required. Late postoperative satisfaction scores were significantly higher than early postoperative scores (P < 0.01). At late follow-up, 28 patients (90.3%) were satisfied or very satisfied. Transient postoperative edema occurred in all patients, and transient upper-lip or infraorbital-region hypoesthesia occurred in 12 patients (38.7%), resolving spontaneously within 3 months. No infection, implant exposure, migration, extrusion, chronic inflammation, sinus tract formation, or permanent infraorbital nerve injury was observed.ConclusionIntegrated polyetheretherketone patient-specific implants appear to be a feasible option for selected patients with multi-subunit midface concavity and normal or essentially normal occlusion. The integrated patient-specific design may support customized skeletal augmentation across adjacent midfacial subunits and individualized aesthetic planning. Further studies with longer follow-up, comparative controls, and objective three-dimensional outcome assessment are warranted.]]> https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1814872 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1814872 2026-07-07T00:00:00Z Case Report Xing-Kai KangBin WuJing WangYi-Zhou ShaoTao Wang https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1750514 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1750514 2026-07-07T00:00:00Z Original Research Bo WangXiaojun DengXinguo SunZhang HuHuiping LiQiong Yan  0.05). The intervention group showed significantly shorter times to first flatus, defecation, bowel sound recovery, first ambulation, and reduced hospital stay (all P < 0.001). Complication rates, including LEDVT and pulmonary infection (2.63% vs. 8.33%) were lower in the intervention group (all P<0.05). The intervention group also exhibited improved coagulation profiles, lower HADS anxiety/depression scores, and higher health behavior scores (allP<0.001).ConclusionTPB-based perioperative intervention accelerates recovery, reduces LEDVT and complications, optimizes coagulation, alleviates negative emotions, and enhances health behaviors, supporting its integration into standard perioperative care for LC patients.]]> https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1811255 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1811255 2026-07-07T00:00:00Z Original Research Jun Hee LeeHyeong Hun SongByung Mo GuSoon Young HwangKook Nam HanHyun Koo Kim https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1841068 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1841068 2026-07-07T00:00:00Z Review Vladislav MuldiiarovZachary M. Bauman https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1883256 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1883256 2026-07-06T00:00:00Z Case Report Majed Yahya M. AlshahraniFares RayzahIbrahim M. ALmanjahiAbdullah A. AlquziHisham Sabry AbdelhafizYahya Shabi https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1859732 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1859732 2026-07-06T00:00:00Z Review HaiLian ChenShuang ZouLinlin Zheng https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1864578 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1864578 2026-07-06T00:00:00Z Case Report Abdulrahman AlaseemFahad AlshayhanMansor AldaijyZiyad AlsuwailemRayan AlfayezWaleed AlbishiHisham AlsanawiIbrahim Alshaygy https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1886182 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1886182 2026-07-06T00:00:00Z Original Research Linling GuiHui MaTao ZhuRunwu SunYuan CaiTing GaoHaitao ChenXufei Duan