https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery RSS Feed for Frontiers in Surgery | New and Recent Articles en-us Frontiers Feed Generator,version:1 2026-04-29T20:35:09.666+00:00 60 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1779653 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1779653 2026-04-29T00:00:00Z Case Report Yinghao ZhuYang LouXianguo Chen https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1800944 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1800944 2026-04-29T00:00:00Z Original Research Gaole HeHaopeng LiLiang YanZhongkai LiuTeng Lu https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1777076 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1777076 2026-04-29T00:00:00Z Case Report Xun GuoZhuohang LiuZheng LiuHongquan Fan https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1720182 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1720182 2026-04-29T00:00:00Z Original Research Mingjian LiJiahui LiuLianshu DingJing XuYanxia DengPengcheng Wang https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1763803 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1763803 2026-04-29T00:00:00Z Original Research Yongde YangJiawei XuRong LiaoYanlin Zhou https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1816291 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1816291 2026-04-29T00:00:00Z Original Research Duan WenboFang GuofangWu JiachangSang HongxunCao Lei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1791457 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1791457 2026-04-29T00:00:00Z Review Cong DengYongxing XuMaolin ZhongShihong Li https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1779069 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1779069 2026-04-29T00:00:00Z Original Research Mohammad AladailehSaleh A. Ba-ShammakhJoud Al RamadnehYousef BadranMusab Al-A’athalAlmu’atasim KhameesTayseer Al-tawarahAnas AljaiuossiBassem Al BatainehMohammad AL-Smirat  0.05).ConclusionsOpen deroofing plus albendazole in Northern Jordanian children was associated with low recurrence and acceptable morbidity. Expanded ultrasound screening, community zoonosis education, and WHO-aligned protocols are needed.]]> https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1769996 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1769996 2026-04-29T00:00:00Z Review Bo LiuWeimin WuWeigang HuHuarong ZhengTianyao Lan https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1750755 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1750755 2026-04-29T00:00:00Z Original Research Zhi-da ChenYuan-jie JiangBin LinXiao-yang HuYu-zhe ZengHui LiuTao-yi Cai https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1801458 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1801458 2026-04-28T00:00:00Z Case Report Jigang JingYuting WuHua Zhuang 5 mm in 3 cases; contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was performed in 6 cases, showing inhomogeneous hyperenhancement in 2 cases and homogeneous isoenhancement in 4 cases. Among the 9 rectal NECs (G3), 8 presented with localized irregular thickening of the rectal wall, 7 invaded perirectal tissues or organs, all lesions were hypoechoic or heteroechoic with muscularis propria infiltration, and 4 cases had enlarged local lymph nodes. Compared with rectal cancer, the distribution of T stage (T1 vs. T2–4) differed significantly (P = 0.016), whereas no significant differences were noted in gender, age, distance from the lower margin of the lesion to the intersphincteric sulcus, lesion length, lesion thickness, or N stage (all P > 0.05). The overall concordance rate between ultrasonographic staging and surgical pathological staging was 70.6% (12/17) for all rectal NENs, with 87.5% (7/8) for NETs and 55.6% (5/9) for NECs. A limitation of this retrospective feasibility study is its relatively small sample size (n = 17), which needs further verification in future multi-center large-sample studies.ConclusionsRectal NETs exhibit characteristic TRUS manifestations and require differentiation from polyps, adenocarcinomas, and inflammatory lesions. Transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (TR-CEUS), though not widely adopted, is feasible for the preoperative assessment of rectal NENs and may be valuable for follow-up after endoscopic resection to monitor recurrence.]]> https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1734148 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1734148 2026-04-28T00:00:00Z Original Research Domenico GalettaFederico ReaStefano MargaritoraAgostini VanessaFrancesco FaccioloFranca MelfiGianluca GugginoRoberto CrisciCollaborators and Participating Institutions 66%).ResultsOverall, a total of 49 (82%) participants scored the proposed statements. The consensus was reached in 35/39 issues (89.7%). Responders agreed (>90%) that medical (comorbidities, anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies) and surgical factors (pleural adhesions, procedures on parietal pleura and chest wall resection) influenced BTS. Use of VIBeS has gained broad positive acceptance (>90%). Effects of BTS have achieved a broad positive consensus both for intraoperative and post-operative ones (surgeon stress, overall costs, length of operation, postoperative complications) (>73%). Modality of reduction and management of BTS (use of appropriate hemostatic products according to the coagulation status and VIBeS) has obtained a broad positive consensus.ConclusionsThe expert panel of Italian thoracic surgeons reached an agreement on the majority of issues of Delphi survey (factors, effects and management of BTS). The use of a VIBeS is recommended. In the absence of prospective and randomized studies on management of BTS, this document may be useful for reducing practice variation among thoracic surgeons facing intraoperative bleeding.]]> https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1735378 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1735378 2026-04-28T00:00:00Z Original Research Tieyuan SunLinna WeiPan HuXiaolong YouLubin LiuMingbo Liu https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1801218 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1801218 2026-04-24T00:00:00Z Original Research Yingying ShiLan WeiQiyuan BaoJunxiang WenZhusheng ZhangZhuochao LiuQi LiuJie ChenXiaoqing Yang https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1738809 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1738809 2026-04-24T00:00:00Z Case Report M. De RobertisP. P. CotrufoN. Khaled MansourP. OlivaC. CappelliE. StucchiA. BaramG. CapoU. CariboniG. MercanteM. FornariF. PessinaC. Brembilla https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1740978 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1740978 2026-04-24T00:00:00Z Original Research Sirui DingXiaolong ChenTienan FengXuequn HuangLi ShenHaifa Hong https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1814772 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1814772 2026-04-24T00:00:00Z Original Research Wenbin GaoXianpu SongYanhua FengChuo Liu  0.05). The sedation failure rate in the study group was 8.0% (8/100), and all 8 cases achieved effective sedation after rescue dosing with one additional spray (15μg for 10.7–19.4 kg, 25 μg for 19.4–28.0 kg) intranasal dexmedetomidine hydrochloride; no sedation failure was observed in the control group. No serious adverse reactions were observed in either group. Preoperative and intraoperative cooperation in the study group was significantly better than that in the control group, and the incidence of agitation was significantly lower (P < 0.01), 95%CI: 0.0–0.2. No serious adverse reactions were observed in either group. Preoperative heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and mean arterial pressure were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). Intraoperatively, the study group maintained more stable vital signs, with significantly lower heart rate and mean arterial pressure than the control group (P < 0.05), 95%CI for heart rate: 8.2–15.7; 95%CI for mean arterial pressure: 5.1–10.3, all within normal physiological ranges.ConclusionPreoperative intranasal dexmedetomidine hydrochloride is an effective and safe regimen for improving intraoperative cooperation, stabilizing vital signs, reducing agitation, and enhancing cosmetic suture quality and family satisfaction in children with emergency facial trauma.]]> https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1794712 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1794712 2026-04-23T00:00:00Z Case Report Xiangyu ZongQicai LiChunpu LiHongtao GeXuemei YangYingze ZhangTianrui Wang https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1787138 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1787138 2026-04-23T00:00:00Z Case Report Mohammad ShawirMohammad AbdulkarimMohammed ElnibrasHaneen BrnawiMarei Al amariRoaa Ghazi KhanElsadig ShiekedienYazeed Al Jabri https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1778083 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1778083 2026-04-23T00:00:00Z Case Report Shiyu PanChangxi ChenGun ChenJiande GongXianhao YingHongliang Li