<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Sustain. Food Syst.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Sustain. Food Syst.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2571-581X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fsufs.2020.00002</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Sustainable Food Systems</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Extractability, Distribution Among Different Particle Size Fractions, and Phytotoxicity of Cu and Zn in Composts Made With the Separated Solid Fraction of Pig Slurry</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Clemente</surname> <given-names>Rafael</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/820827/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>S&#x000E1;ez-Tovar</surname> <given-names>Jos&#x000E9; Antonio</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Bernal</surname> <given-names>Maria Pilar</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/423537/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Centro de Edafolog&#x000ED;a y Biolog&#x000ED;a Aplicada del Segura, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Campus Universitario de Espinardo</institution>, <addr-line>Murcia</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Paula Alvarenga, Higher Institute of Agronomy, University of Lisbon, Portugal</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Guanghui Yu, Tianjin University, China; Giovanni Vallini, University of Verona, Italy</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Maria Pilar Bernal <email>pbernal&#x00040;cebas.csic.es</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="present-address" id="fn001"><p>&#x02020;Present address: Jos&#x000E9; Antonio S&#x000E1;ez-Tovar, Department of Agrochemistry and Environment, EPSO, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Waste Management in Agroecosystems, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>29</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<elocation-id>2</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>03</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2020 Clemente, S&#x000E1;ez-Tovar and Bernal.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Clemente, S&#x000E1;ez-Tovar and Bernal</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><p>The presence of elevated concentrations of heavy metals (Cu and Zn) in pig slurry and, particularly, in the solid fraction obtained after solid-liquid separation is a limiting factor for their use in agricultural soils. These metals are further concentrated if compost is produced from solid pig slurry. This paper studies the influence of the composting of the separated solid phase of pig slurry on the concentrations and solubility of Cu and Zn, and their distribution in the different particle size fractions, as well as evaluating their potential toxic effects on seed germination and seedling growth. Two composts were prepared with the solid fraction of pig slurry in a piglets and sows farm, using two different bulking agents (cereal straw and cotton gin waste). The concentrations of Cu and Zn in the mature compost were higher due to organic matter degradation; however, their solubility decreased from 0.72 and 1.76% in the solid fraction of pig slurry to 0.18 and 0.30% of total Cu and Zn, respectively, in the compost prepared with cotton gin waste. Zinc was concentrated in the smallest particle size fraction, while the Cu concentration was highest in the largest particles, and associated to the organic matter/humic fraction. The elimination of the smallest particle size fraction would not reduce significantly the total heavy metal concentration of the composts. Nevertheless, the low solubility of both metals in the composts avoided any significant toxic effect on seed germination and also in the growth test when compost was present at low rates.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>composting</kwd>
<kwd>germination index</kwd>
<kwd>heavy metals</kwd>
<kwd>pig slurry</kwd>
<kwd>solubility</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci&#x000F3;n y Universidades<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100014440</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="37"/>
<page-count count="8"/>
<word-count count="6726"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The intensive and large-scale development of pig farming has led to the concentration of pig slurry production in small areas that offer limited land for its disposal and use in agriculture (FAO, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2009</xref>; S&#x000E1;ez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2017</xref>). In addition, the application of pig slurry to agricultural soil is limited to 170 kg N ha<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in areas vulnerable to nitrate pollution (CEE, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">1991</xref>). These facts have led both farmers and researchers to seek alternative uses and management options for pig slurry, in order to avoid the need to transport, or the excessive accumulation of this material in the farm, with the consequent environmental concern that this may pose (Burton and Turner, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2003</xref>). Frequently, pig slurry is separated into its solid and liquid fractions through different physico-chemical processes in farms (Popovic et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2012</xref>), which allows the management of both fractions separately (S&#x000E1;ez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2017</xref>). While the liquid fraction can be used as nutrient-rich irrigation water on agricultural land in the vicinity of the farm, the solid fraction can be either transported further for landspreading or subjected to microbial stabilization processes (i.e., composting; Santos et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2016</xref>; S&#x000E1;ez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2017</xref>).</p>
<p>However, the concentrations of potentially toxic heavy metals (mainly Cu and Zn) in the slurry may prevent its use in agricultural soils devoted to food production (Moral et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2008</xref>). Such metals, despite being essential micronutrients for plant and crop growth, can become toxic above their corresponding threshold concentrations. The high concentrations of these metals in pig slurry derive from their use as ZnO and CuSO<sub>4</sub> in feed additives in pig farms (especially during pregnancy and in the post-weaning phase; Carlson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">1999</xref>; Woodworth et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">1999</xref>). After solid-liquid separation, the metals from the slurry are recovered mostly in the solid fraction (Popovic et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2012</xref>; S&#x000E1;ez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2017</xref>), which can be a major factor limiting the use of this waste material for direct agricultural use or for preparation of high quality compost (Ko et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2008</xref>; Bernal et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2017</xref>; S&#x000E1;ez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2017</xref>). Therefore, repeated application of the solid fraction of pig slurry or its derived composts to soil, as fertilizer in crop production, can build up metals in the soil with the corresponding environmental risk, as has been found already for sewage sludge and municipal solid waste (MSW) and their derived composts (Hargreaves et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2008</xref>; Smith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>). The use of compost rich in heavy metals would affect not only soil, but also surface and groundwater and the surrounding environment, and may end in the introduction of the contaminants into the food chain (Smith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>).</p>
<p>A potential alternative use for pig slurry is as a soil improver in the restoration of trace element contaminated soils (Clemente et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2012</xref>; Mart&#x000ED;nez-Fern&#x000E1;ndez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2014</xref>), where the addition of low amounts of metals with the slurry would not significantly increase their contents in the soil and would, therefore, suppose no environmental risk (Pardo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2014</xref>). The use of fresh, raw pig slurry, or its separated solid fraction in contaminated soils has been shown to be an effective alternative for the recycling of this material, as it helps to stabilize the contaminants in the soil (Clemente et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2019</xref>) and promotes the establishment of a self-sustainable and long-lasting vegetation cover (Pardo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2014</xref>) in otherwise completely bare soils. Compost from MSW, green waste, or olive-mill wastes has been found to be efficient in reducing the availability and solubility of heavy metals during the remediation of contaminated soils (Farrell and Jones, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2010</xref>; Pardo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2016</xref>). The use of compost made with the solid fraction of pig slurry as a component of the substrate used for the cultivation of bioenergy crops (S&#x000E1;ez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2016</xref>) has also been shown to be a valid management alternative for pig slurry solids.</p>
<p>The bioavailable fraction of the contaminants (the one that can be easily taken up by the plants and other living organisms present in the soil) has been recently proposed as the fraction that has to be regulated and monitored in remediation procedures and for which the corresponding legislation and maximum allowed limits have to be defined (Alvarenga et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2018</xref>). Notwithstanding, the fact that the bioavailability of the metals in the soils may change over time must be also contemplated, especially after the application of biodegradable organic materials, and total concentrations equally limited and regulated. Therefore, the availability (solubility and/or extractability) of the contaminants present in the organic materials used in remediation procedures may have to be taken into account&#x02014;in addition to the total contents in these materials&#x02014;when precise restoration plans are designed. The solubility or extractability of heavy metals in compost and other organic materials can be assessed by the use of single extraction reagents, such as neutral salt solutions, and sequential extraction procedures (Walter et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2006</xref>; Smith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>; Alvarenga et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2015</xref>). In any case, these extraction procedures are operationally defined, and bioassays are strongly recommended to complement chemical information in toxicity/risk assessment (van Gestel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2001</xref>).</p>
<p>The heavy metal concentrations, both total and bioavailable, in compost from organic wastes have lately received increasing attention. This is a relevant issue in the European Union, where environmental policies aim to increase the recycling of biodegradable wastes and composts on land and to prevent inputs of contaminants entering the soil (Smith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>). Most of the studies carried out in this regard have focused on sewage sludge, MSW, and the composts derived from them. For instance, heavy metals are mainly associated with finer particle size classes in mechanically-segregated MSW (Sharma et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">1997</xref>). Consequently, the mechanical screening of these composts to remove the fine fraction has been considered as a useful technique to reduce heavy metal concentrations in the marketed composts and therefore to increase their agricultural value (Smith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>). Regarding bioavailability, most studies have found that the extractability and availability of the metals decrease throughout the composting and maturation periods (Eneji et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2003</xref>; Amir et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2005</xref>).</p>
<p>The concentrations of metals in the feedstock used for composting, not the type of feedstock, affect the final concentrations in the compost (Smith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>). However, the availability of metals can depend on both the content in the feedstock and the maturation state of the compost. In fact, Soumar&#x000E9; et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2003</xref>) reported higher concentrations of Zn in the water-soluble and exchangeable fractions of a peat-based substrate, compared to green waste compost, despite a lower total Zn concentration in the former, which highlights the importance of the physico-chemical characteristics of the organic materials regarding metal bioavailability.</p>
<p>Therefore, the objective of this work was to study the influence of the bio-oxidation/maturation processes on the concentrations and solubility of heavy metals (Zn and Cu) during the composting of the separated solid phase of pig slurry, and their distribution in the different particle size fractions, evaluating their potential toxic effects on seed germination and seedling growth. We hypothesized that the bioavailability and toxicity of Cu and Zn in pig slurry can be reduced through the stabilization of the organic matter during composting, and that Cu and Zn may be associated mainly with a specific particle size (fine) fraction of the compost that could be easily removed by sieving for reducing their concentration in the full compost.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Compost Samples</title>
<p>The composts studied in the experiment were prepared with a mixture of the solid fraction (SF) of pig slurry obtained from a piglets and sows farm located in southeast Spain and two different bulking materials: cereal straw and cotton gin waste. The SF was isolated using a screw-press system for solid-liquid separation (without flocculants). Two composting piles were prepared within the farm facilities: Pile 1, mixing the separated SF (SF1, solid fraction stored for one month) with cereal straw, as bulking agent, in a trapezoidal pile (3:2, v:v; 4.8 m<sup>3</sup>); and Pile 2, mixing SF (SF2, freshly separated) with cotton gin waste (2:1, v:v; 19.3 m<sup>3</sup>). The windrow system with aeration by mechanical turning was used for both piles. The bio-oxidative phase of Pile 1 lasted for 75 days (with 3 mechanical turning events in total) and that of Pile 2 for 120 days (with 5 mechanical turning events in total); the total composting times (including the maturation period) were 170 and 187 days, respectively. Compost samples were obtained by mixing seven sub-samples taken from seven representative sites of the corresponding pile, covering the whole profile (from the top to the bottom of the pile). Further details of the composting process can be found in S&#x000E1;ez et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2017</xref>).</p>
<p>The original solid fractions (SF1 and SF2) and the final mature composts (1 and 2) were characterized physico-chemically (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Tables 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). The moisture content was determined after drying at 105&#x000B0;C for 24 h and the organic matter (OM) concentration by loss on ignition at 550&#x000B0;C for 24 h. The electrical conductivity (EC) and pH were measured in 1:10 water extracts (w/v). The water-soluble organic carbon (C<sub>w</sub>) was determined in 1:20 (w/v) water extracts, using an automatic analyzer for liquid samples (TOC-V CSN Analyzer, Shimadzu, Japan). The total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) were determined in an automatic elemental microanalyzer (EuroVector Elemental Analyser, Milano, Italy). The humic-like fractions were extracted with 0.1 M NaOH (C<sub>EX</sub>) from the composts and from the different particle size fractions, and from these the fulvic acid-like C (C<sub>FA</sub>) was separated through acid precipitation of the humic acid-like C (C<sub>HA</sub>); C<sub>EX</sub> and C<sub>FA</sub> were analyzed in an automatic carbon analyzer for liquid samples, and C<sub>HA</sub> was calculated as the difference.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Characteristics of the composts and the solid fractions of pig slurry used for composting (SF1 and SF2).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SF1</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SF2</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Compost 1</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Compost 2</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Moisture (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">85.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">EC (dS m<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">OM (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TOC (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">432</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">390</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">250</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">288</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C<sub>w</sub> (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C<sub>HA</sub> (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C<sub>EXT</sub> (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TN (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.059</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">P (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">K (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fe (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2090</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1117</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4762</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4247</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mn (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">578</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">395</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">737</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">739</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ni (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pb (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>The concentrations of Cu and Zn are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref></italic>.</p>
<p><italic>EC, electrical conductivity; OM, organic matter; TOC, total organic carbon; C<sub>w</sub>, water-soluble carbon; TN, total nitrogen</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Total and 0.1 M CaCl<sub>2</sub>-extractable metal concentrations in the solid fractions of pig slurry (SF1 and SF2), the initial composting mixtures (Pile 1 and Pile 2), and the mature composts (Compost 1 and Compost 2).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Total Zn</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;" colspan="2"><bold>Zn CaCl</bold><sub><bold><bold>2</bold></bold></sub></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Total Cu</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;" colspan="2"><bold>Cu CaCl</bold><sub><bold><bold>2</bold></bold></sub></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>(mg kg<sup><bold>&#x02212;1</bold></sup>)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>(mg kg<sup><bold>&#x02212;1</bold></sup>)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>(% Total)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>(mg kg<sup><bold>&#x02212;1</bold></sup>)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>(mg kg<sup><bold>&#x02212;1</bold></sup>)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>(% Total)</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SF1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3098 &#x000B1; 32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56 &#x000B1; 1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">249 &#x000B1; 3.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9 &#x000B1; 0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pile 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2931 &#x000B1; 99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10 &#x000B1; 0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">205 &#x000B1; 21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4 &#x000B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Compost 1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5552 &#x000B1; 32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47 &#x000B1; 1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">351 &#x000B1; 17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5 &#x000B1; 0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SF2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3270 &#x000B1; 91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56 &#x000B1; 1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">269 &#x000B1; 4.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8 &#x000B1; 0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pile 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4720 &#x000B1; 12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41 &#x000B1; 0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">173 &#x000B1; 5.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2 &#x000B1; 0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Compost 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5651 &#x000B1; 40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17 &#x000B1; 2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">335 &#x000B1; 17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6 &#x000B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.18</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The solid fractions, final compost samples, and initial mixtures for composting were analyzed for their pseudo total heavy metal concentrations through microwave (ETHOS1, Milestone) assisted acid digestion (HNO<sub>3</sub>/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>; 4:1, v/v) followed by measurement in an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Thermo iCE 3000 series).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Particle Size Fractionation</title>
<p>The mature composts were mechanically sieved at different particle sizes (mm): &#x0003C; 0.05; 0.05&#x02013;0.5; 0.5&#x02013;1.0; 1&#x02013;2; and &#x0003E;2, using a vibratory sieve shaker (RETAC-3D, RETSCH). The different particle size fractions of the mature composts were analyzed for total Cu and Zn as indicated previously, and for soluble and exchangeable Cu and Zn through 0.1 M CaCl<sub>2</sub> extraction (1:10, w/v; 16 h) and measurement by atomic absorption spectrophotometry.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Phytotoxicity Test</title>
<p>The potential phytotoxicity of the composts was evaluated through a direct acute toxicity plant growth test (ISO 15 799.1999), using different proportions of compost with an artificial soil (100/0, 50/50, 25/75, 12.5/87.5, 6/94, 3/97, and 0/100, w/w%). The artificial soil was prepared according to OECD 207.1984. Around 80 g of the corresponding mixtures (at 70% of their WHC) were placed in plastic seedbeds (10 replicates for each mixture). One seed of <italic>Zea mays</italic> L. was sown in each hole and the plants were left to grow for 2 weeks after 50% of the plants had emerged in the controls (artificial soil without compost), in a growth chamber with controlled temperature and relative humidity (11/13 h day/night cycles at 25/18&#x000B0;C and 58/70% relative humidity). For each treatment the number of emerged seedlings was recorded and the fresh weight of the plants (aboveground and roots) determined. The growth index for the fresh weight (g per aboveground of the plants) was expressed as a percentage with respect to the control (artificial soil without compost). The EC50 and LC50 (the compost concentration, in v/v%, at which plant fresh weight and seedling emergence, respectively, were reduced by 50%) were calculated by applying a linear regression analysis to the relationship between the logarithm of the percentage compost concentration and the percentage toxic effect on plant growth (fresh weight) and seedling emergence.</p>
<p>An indirect seed germination index (GI) test was performed using compost water extracts (1:10, w/v; 24 h) and <italic>Lepidium sativum</italic> L. (cress) seeds (Zucconi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">1981</xref>; de Bertoldi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">1983</xref>). Ten seeds were placed on filter paper in plastic Petri dishes, 2 ml of the water extracts were carefully added, the seeds were covered with a new layer of filter paper, and the dishes were closed. The Petri dishes (10 per extract and dilution, including deionized water controls) were wrapped in aluminum foil and incubated for 3 days at 21&#x000B0;C. The germination index (GI) was calculated from the percentage of seed germination (G) and root elongation (R), determined in comparison with the results for the controls, as: GI = [G &#x000D7; R]/100.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>The IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 software was used for the statistical analysis. The standard deviation of the means was calculated for the chemical composition of the compost. A one-way ANOVA was performed to determine the effects of the different particle size fractions on the chemical parameters for each compost; and data were also subject to two-way ANOVA (General Linear Model) using particle size fraction and compost as independent factors. Differences between means were determined using Tukey&#x00027;s test. Before the statistical analysis, the data were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov&#x02013;Smirnov test. Pearson&#x00027;s correlation coefficients between the chemical parameters and the TE concentrations of the different fractions and composts were also determined.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec>
<title>Evolution of Metals Availability During Composting</title>
<p>The solid fractions of slurry obtained by screw press separation on the farm showed elevated concentrations of Zn and Cu (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The concentrations of Cu in SF1 and SF2 were similar to those reported in other pig slurry separation studies (Popovic et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2012</xref>), but the concentrations of Zn were higher in the present study (&#x0003E;3,000 mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> dw). This was probably because the pig slurry studied here was mainly produced by piglets, and this slurry has a higher concentration of Zn than that from fattening pigs (Moral et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2008</xref>), since Zn is provided as a feed additive (ZnO) to piglets in order to avoid digestion problems and to improve nutrients assimilation (Carlson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">1999</xref>; Woodworth et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">1999</xref>). Also, Zn and Cu are excreted at relatively higher rates than other feed constituents (Shepard and Sapinelli, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2012</xref>), and over 90% of Cu and Zn has been reported to be retained in the solid fraction of pig slurry after solid-liquid separation using different technologies (Ria&#x000F1;o and Garc&#x000ED;a-Gonz&#x000E1;lez, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2014</xref>).</p>
<p>The total concentrations of Cu and Zn increased in both piles during composting (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>) due to the degradation of organic matter (OM) and the consequent loss of weight in the piles (Ko et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2008</xref>; Smith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>). According to S&#x000E1;ez et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2017</xref>), the increase is most evident in the earlier stages of composting, when the rate of OM degradation is highest, in agreement with previous observations (Hsu and Lo, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2000</xref>; Ko et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2008</xref>). The Zn concentrations were greater than those found in compost prepared with pig slurry from fattening pigs (Santos et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2016</xref>), confirming its origin from the piglet diet. Therefore, the total concentrations of Cu and, especially, Zn were very high in both composts; the values for Zn were well above the limit established for compost in Spain and for fertilizer products in Europe (Ministerio de la Presidencia, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2017</xref>; EU, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2019</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present experiment, the concentrations of the metals (Cu and Zn) in soluble and exchangeable forms (0.1 M CaCl<sub>2</sub>-extractable) were very low in comparison with the total values, showing low percentages of extractability, and both tended to decrease from the solid fraction to the mature compost, especially in compost 2 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). The values found for Cu were lower than those reported by Alvarenga et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2015</xref>) for compost from MSWs with lower total-Cu concentrations (180 mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), giving an extractable/total Cu concentration ratio similar to that in the initial untransformed wastes (solid fraction and initial mixtures) in the present experiment. However, Alvarenga et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2015</xref>) found values of 0.1 M CaCl<sub>2</sub>-extractable Zn in compost from MSW and from agricultural wastes similar to those found here, although their composts had lower total-Zn concentrations. This indicates that the Cu and Zn in the pig slurry composts have very low solubility, compared to other common composted materials. Decreases in heavy metal availability in different organic residual materials, especially MSW, have been found during the composting process, including the maturation period (Smith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>). Amir et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2005</xref>), using a sequential extraction, found that &#x0003C;2% of the total heavy metals were easily available (extracted in dilute KNO<sub>3</sub>) in mature sewage sludge compost, and that the Cu and Zn were mainly associated with organic and carbonate fractions. The OM stabilization and humification processes, which occur during composting, could facilitate heavy metal (especially Cu) interaction with ligands of greater complexing strength, rendering them less bioavailable (Smith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>). Humic substances have been suggested as the main sites of metal sorption in compost (Song and Greenway, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2004</xref>), which is greater for Cu than for Zn. Then, the lower concentration of humic-like substances (NaOH-extractable C and C<sub>HA</sub>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>) found in compost 1 (prepared with cereal straw), with respect to compost 2 (prepared with cotton gin waste), could be responsible for the slightly greater proportion of available Cu and Zn in compost 1 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Therefore, the bulking agent used had a significant effect on the solubility of metals, which may have affected both the degradation of the OM during composting and the OM humification process (S&#x000E1;ez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2017</xref>). Also, the lower value of pH found in compost 1, with respect to compost 2, could have contributed to the higher solubility of Cu and Zn in the former. So, in addition to the feedstock for composting, the physico-chemical characteristics of the final compost affected the solubility and availability of Zn and Cu.</p>
<p>The particle size distribution of both mature composts followed a similar pattern: the coarsest fraction (&#x0003E;2 mm) was the most abundant and the finest fraction (&#x0003C;0.05 mm) the least abundant, with a tendency for the abundance to increase with the particle size (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Tables 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). The OM and TOC concentrations (as well as C<sub>HA</sub> and C<sub>FA</sub>) decreased with the particle size, which indicates that the inorganic components dominated in the smallest particles with the highest TN concentrations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Characteristics of the different particle size fractions in Compost 1.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Particle size (mm)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.05</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.05&#x02013;0.2</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.2&#x02013;0.5</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.5&#x02013;1</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>1&#x02013;2</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003E;2</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>ANOVA</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Size distribution (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.d.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">OM (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.2c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.3c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.9b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.2a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.4a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">55.8ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TOC (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">206b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">256a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">284a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">273a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">270a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TN (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.2a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21.9b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.2b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.1b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.4b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.8b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C<sub>HA</sub> (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.d.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.33b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.15b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.14b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.83a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.27a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C<sub>FA</sub> (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.d.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.28b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.09a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.50a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.41a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.13a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Zn (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10239a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6141b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5351bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4325d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4510cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5246c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cu (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">246d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">291c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">333b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">330b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">350ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">368a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CaCl<sub>2</sub>-Zn (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.d.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53.7a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39.6c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.2b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.3c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.7bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CaCl<sub>2</sub>-Cu (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.d.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.22b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.27ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.41ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.34ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.42a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>n.d., not determined. Values followed by the same letter in each row are not significantly different according to Tukey&#x00027;s test at p &#x0003C; 0.05. <sup>&#x0002A;</sup>, <sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup>, and <sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup> indicate significant at p &#x0003C; 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p>Characteristics of the different particle size fractions in Compost 2.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Particle size (mm)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003C;0.05</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.05&#x02013;0.2</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.2&#x02013;0.5</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.5&#x02013;1</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>1&#x02013;2</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x0003E;2</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>ANOVA</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Size distribution (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.d.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">OM (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.4d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.9d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.0c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.9ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">62.2a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.8b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TOC (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">211b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">208b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">220b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">268a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">268a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">277a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TN (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.1a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.5c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.7c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.5c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.2ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.6bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C<sub>HA</sub> (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.d.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.40c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.43c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.70b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.53b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.85a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C<sub>AH</sub> (g kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.d.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.s.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Zn (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7202a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5316bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4957bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4573c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5465b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4964bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cu (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">270d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">286cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">293bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">291cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">350a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">314b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CaCl<sub>2</sub>-Zn (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.3b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.6a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.3a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.6a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.5a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.4a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CaCl<sub>2</sub>-Cu (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.s.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>n.d., not determined. Values followed by the same letter in each row are not significantly different according to Tukey&#x00027;s test at p &#x0003C; 0.05. n.s., <sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup> and <sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup> indicate not significant and significant at p &#x0003C; 0.01 and 0.001, respectively</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption><p>Significance of the ANOVA factors for the characteristics of the composts (General Linear Model).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Factors</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>OM</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>TOC</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>TN</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>C<sub><bold>HA</bold></sub></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>C<sub><bold>FA</bold></sub></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Total-Zn</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Total-Cu</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>CaCl<sub><bold>2</bold></sub>-Zn</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>CaCl<sub><bold>2</bold></sub>-Cu</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Particle size</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.s.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Compost</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.s.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">P &#x000D7; C</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.s.</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n.s.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>n.s., <sup>&#x0002A;</sup>, <sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup>, and <sup>&#x0002A;&#x0002A;&#x0002A;</sup> indicate not significant and significant at p &#x0003C; 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In both composts, the highest Zn concentrations were found in the smallest particle size fraction (&#x0003C;0.05 mm), with the lowest TOC and C<sub>HA</sub> concentrations, while, contrastingly, the concentrations of Cu were highest in the largest particle size fraction (&#x0003E;2 mm) that had the highest TOC, C<sub>HA</sub>, and C<sub>FA</sub> concentrations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Tables 3</xref>&#x02013;<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). In fact, Zn is added to the piglet diet as ZnO (Carlson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">1999</xref>), which is mainly excreted and recovered in the slurry (Moral et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2008</xref>), unaltered by the animal. This together with the low Zn(II) complexing capacity of the humic fraction (Hern&#x000E1;ndez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2006</xref>) and its ability to precipitate as Zn oxides at high pH values, suggest that the Zn in mature compost was mainly linked to hardly soluble inorganic forms. Total Zn concentration was correlated positively total-N (<italic>r</italic> = 0.555, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01 data of both compost), and negatively with OM and TOC (all at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001). Regarding extractable-Zn concentrations, negative correlations were found with C<sub>HA</sub>, C<sub>FA</sub> and C<sub>EX</sub> (all at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001), all supporting the idea of Zn being scarcely retained in the organic fraction, and mainly linked with inorganic compounds. The highly significant correlations found between the Cu concentration and both TOC (<italic>r</italic> = 0.850 and 0.656 for composts 1 and 2, significant at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001 and 0.05, respectively; <italic>r</italic> = 0.756 at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001 for the data of both composts) and OM (<italic>r</italic> = 0.855 and 0.757 for composts 1 and 2, significant at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001 and 0.01, respectively; <italic>r</italic> = 0.692 at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001 for the data of both composts) reveal the suitability of this metal for retention by the OM. Also, the correlation between the concentration of extractable-Cu and that of C<sub>HA</sub> and extractable-C was significant in both cases at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01 (<italic>r</italic> = &#x02212;0.590 and &#x02212;0.558, respectively), but the negative relationship indicates the retention of Cu by the humified OM produced during composting. Hern&#x000E1;ndez et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2006</xref>) concluded that the stability constant of Cu complexes with humic acids are much larger than the corresponding values for Zn, even in pig slurry organic matter.</p>
<p>Due to the largest concentrations of Zn in the smallest particle size fraction, the removal of this fraction by mechanical screening of the composts could be seen as an option to reduce the concentration of this metal in marketable compost, as usually done for MSW compost. However, its elimination would remove only a small amount of the total metal content of the composts (0.28 and 0.64% of total Zn in Compost 1 and Compost 2, and 0.10 and 0.52% for Cu, respectively; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>), maintaining virtually unaltered metal concentrations, since this fraction represented only a minor part of the compost (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Tables 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Contribution (mg kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) of each particle size fraction to the total Cu and Zn concentrations in the composts (concentration in the fraction &#x000D7; proportion of the fraction in the compost).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fsufs-04-00002-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Phytotoxicity Test and Germination Index</title>
<p>The GI increased for both piles throughout the composting process, from scarce seed germination in the initial mixtures (GI&#x0003C;1% in both composts) to 87.8 and 80.2% in final composts 1 and 2, respectively, which indicates the absence of phytotoxicity. Therefore, in spite of the relatively high total concentrations of Zn and Cu in the composts, the low solubility of the metals meant that they did not have any relevant toxic effects on <italic>L. sativum</italic> seed germination, underlining the relevance of metal availability to phytotoxicity.</p>
<p>In the growth test performed with <italic>Z. mays</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>), there were significant decreases in aerial biomass when compost was present at &#x02265;12.5% in the substrate, with root growth affected at 50% compost. Both composts stimulated the growth of maize seedlings when present at up to 3&#x02013;6%, with respect to the control soil without compost; Compost 1 also stimulated root growth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). S&#x000E1;ez et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2016</xref>) found that the presence of low rates of pig slurry compost (&#x0003C;20%) in a growing medium was beneficial for plant growth, as the compost provided essential plant nutrients (mainly N, P, and K). But, when high proportions of the composts were applied in the present experiment, Compost 1 was not able to maintain correct root growth, which resulted in a greater decrease in the growth index than for Compost 2.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Fresh weight of the aboveground and roots of <italic>Zea mays</italic> (g per treatment) and the Growth Index, at different proportions of compost, in the toxicity test. Bars (aboveground or roots) with the same letter are not significantly different according to Tukey&#x00027;s test at <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fsufs-04-00002-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The calculated values of EC<sub>50</sub> were 29% for Compost 1 and 40% for Compost 2, which indicates greater toxicity of Compost 1. In addition, the values of LC<sub>50</sub> (related to seedling emergence) indicated that Compost 1 applied at 62% can provoke a lethal effect on 50% of the seeds, while for Compost 2 no harmful effects were found.</p>
<p>S&#x000E1;ez et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2016</xref>) found that maize seed germination was delayed in growing media prepared with pig slurry compost mixed with coir or biochar at proportions &#x0003E;20% (v:v), with reduced plant growth; however, the percentage seed germination was reduced only at proportions &#x0003E;60%. In that study, the reduction of salinity and of the available Cu and Zn concentrations (so that they did not provoke plant metal stress), as well as the removal of the volatile organic compounds from the compost, were identified as the main benefits of the use of biochar in substrates prepared with pig slurry compost. In agreement with the present results, the authors concluded that the use of pig slurry compost as a component of growing media was only feasible at low ratios (&#x0003C;20%), to avoid phytotoxic effects.</p>
<p>All these results indicate that the presence of Zn and Cu at high concentrations in these composts did not negatively affect seed germination and plant growth when the composts were used at low rates, compatible with agricultural doses. But, the application of high proportions of both composts in the soil under real field conditions can cause the long-term accumulation of Cu and, mainly, Zn in the soil and changes in their solubility and availability leading to negative effects on plants.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s4">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The high total concentrations of Cu and, especially, Zn in the solid phase of the pig slurry led to metal-rich composts. The highest concentration of Zn occurred in the smallest particles whereas Cu remained preferentially in the largest particles with the highest contents of OM and the humified fraction. The elimination of the smallest particle size fraction by mechanical screening would not reduce significantly the total Zn concentration of the composts. Despite the elevated total concentrations, the low solubility of both metals in the mature composts avoided any significant toxic effect on seed germination and also on plant growth when used up to 3&#x02013;6% in the growing media, according to the short-term phytotoxicity tests. Long-term (repeated) compost application could build up the levels of Cu and Zn in the soil, and changes in availability or solubility may occur during organic matter degradation process.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability-statement" id="s5">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>RC performed the statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. JS-T carried out the experimental work under the supervision of MB who revised and corrected the manuscript.</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>The authors wish to thank Dr. D. J. Walker for the English revision of the manuscript and acknowledge support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alvarenga</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clemente</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garbisu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Becerril</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>&#x0201C;Indicators for monitoring mine site rehabilitation,&#x0201D;</article-title> in <source>Bio-Geotechnologies for Mine Site Rehabilitation, 1st Edn</source>., eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>M. N. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Campos Favas</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maiti</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Amsterdam</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>49</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>66</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-812986-9.00003-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alvarenga</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mourinha</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santos</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Palma</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sengo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Sewage sludge, compost and other representative organic wastes as agricultural soil amendments: benefits <italic>versus</italic> limiting factors</article-title>. <source>Waste Manag</source>. <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>44</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>52</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.027</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25708406</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amir</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hafidi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Merlina</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Revel</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Sequential extraction of heavy metals during composting of sewage sludge</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>801</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>810</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.016</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15811408</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bernal</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sommer</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qing</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guoxue</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michel</surname> <given-names>F. C.</given-names> <suffix>Jr.</suffix></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Current approaches and future trends in compost quality criteria for agronomic, environmental, and human health benefits</article-title>. <source>Adv. Agron</source>. <volume>144</volume>, <fpage>143</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>233</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/bs.agron.2017.03.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burton</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <source>Manure Management.</source> Treatment strategies for sustainable agriculture, second ed. Silsoe Research Institute, Lister and Durling Printers, Flitwick, Bedford, UK.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carlson</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Link</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Early- and traditionally weaned nursery pigs benefit from phase-feeding pharmacological concentrations of zinc oxide: effect on metallothionein and mineral concentrations</article-title>. <source>J. Animal Sci</source>. <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>1199</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1207</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2527/1999.7751199x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10340587</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>CEE</collab></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources</article-title>. <source>Off. J. Eur. Commun. L</source> <volume>375</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clemente</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arco-L&#x000E1;zaro</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pardo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;n</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x000E1;nchez-Guerrero</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sevilla</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Combination of soil organic and inorganic amendments helps plants overcome trace element induced oxidative stress and allows phytostabilisation</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source> <volume>223</volume>, <fpage>223</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>231</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.056</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30784729</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clemente</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pardo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez-Fern&#x000E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernal</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The use of a halophytic plant species and organic amendments for the remediation of a trace elements-contaminated soil under semi-arid conditions</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mat.</source> <volume>223&#x02013;224</volume>, <fpage>63</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>71</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.048</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22595543</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Bertoldi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vallini</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pera</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>The biology of composting: a review</article-title>. <source>Waste Manag. Res</source>. <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>157</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>176</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0734242X8300100118</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eneji</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Honna</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamamoto</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Masuda</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Endo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Irshad</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>The relationship between total and available heavy metals in composted manure</article-title>. <source>J. Sustain. Agric.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>125</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>34</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1300/J064v23n01_09</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>EU</collab></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 of The European Parliament and of The Council of 5 June 2019 laying down rules on the making available on the market of EU fertilising products and amending Regulations (EC) No 1069/2009 and (EC) No 1107/2009 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003</article-title>. <source>Off. J. Eur. Union L</source> <volume>170</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>114</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>FAO</collab></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <source>The State of Food and Agriculture. Livestock in the Balance</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0680e/i0680e.pdf">http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i0680e/i0680e.pdf</ext-link> (accessed October 11, 2019).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farrell</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Use of composts in the remediation of heavy metal contaminated soil</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mat.</source> <volume>175</volume>, <fpage>575</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>582</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.044</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19910114</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hargreaves</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adl</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Warman</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A review of the use of composted municipal solid waste in agriculture</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2007.07.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hern&#x000E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Plaza</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Senesi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Polo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Detection of copper(II) and zinc(II) binding to humic acids from pig slurry and amended soils by fluorescence spectroscopy</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut</source>. <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>212</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>220</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2005.11.038</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16442681</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hsu</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lo</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Effect of composting on characterization and leaching of copper, manganese, and zinc from swine manure</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut</source>. <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>119</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>127</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00198-6</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11444000</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ko</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>K. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Umeda</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of maturity parameters and heavy metal contents in composts made from animal manure</article-title>. <source>Waste Manag</source>. <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>813</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>820</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17629693</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez-Fern&#x000E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arco-L&#x000E1;zaro</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernal</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clemente</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Comparison of compost and humic fertiliser effects on growth and trace elements accumulation of native plant species in a mine soil phytorestoration experiment</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Eng.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>588</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>597</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.105</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Ministerio de la Presidencia</collab></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Real Decreto 999/2017 de 24 de noviembre, por el que se modifica el Real Decreto 506/2013, de 28 de junio, sobre productos fertilizantes</article-title>. <source>BOE</source> <volume>296</volume>, <fpage>119396</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>119450</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moral</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>P&#x000E9;rez-Murcia</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>P&#x000E9;rez-Espinosa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moreno-Caselles</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paredes</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rufete</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Salinity, organic content, micronutrients and heavy metals in pig slurries from South-eastern Spain</article-title>. <source>Waste Manag</source>. <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>367</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>371</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2007.01.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17419044</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pardo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bes</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernal</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clemente</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Alleviation of environmental risks associated with severely contaminated mine tailings using amendments: modelling of trace elements speciation, solubility and plant accumulation</article-title>. <source>Environ. Toxicol. Chem</source>. <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>2874</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2884</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/etc.3434</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pardo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clemente</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Epelde</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garbisu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernal</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of the phytostabilisation efficiency in a trace elements contaminated soil using soil health indicators</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater</source>. <volume>268</volume>, <fpage>68</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>76</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24468528</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Popovic</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hjorth</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus, copper and zinc in solid and liquid fractions from full-scale and laboratory-separated pig slurry</article-title>. <source>Environ. Technol.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>2119</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2131</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09593330.2012.660649</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23240207</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ria&#x000F1;o</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garc&#x000ED;a-Gonz&#x000E1;lez</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>On-farm treatment of swine manure base on solid-liquid separation and biological nitrification-denitrification of liquid fraction</article-title>. <source>Environ. Manag</source>. <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>87</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>93</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.10.014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>S&#x000E1;ez</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Belda</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernal</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fornes</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biochar improves agro-environmental aspects of pig slurry compost as a substrate for crops with energy and remediation uses</article-title>. <source>Ind. Crops Prod</source>. <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>97</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>106</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.08.035</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>S&#x000E1;ez</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clemente</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bustamante</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ya&#x000F1;ez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernal</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of the slurry management strategy and the integration of the composting technology in a pig farm &#x02013; Agronomical and environmental implications</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Monitor</source>. <volume>192</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>67</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.040</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28135588</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Santos</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bustamante</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tortosa</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moral</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernal</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Gaseous emissions and process development during composting of pig slurry: the influence of the proportion of cotton gin waste</article-title>. <source>J. Clean. Prod</source>. <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>81</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.084</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Canditelli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fortuna</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cornacchia</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Processing of urban and agro-industrial residues by aerobic composting: review</article-title>. <source>Energy Convers. Manag</source>. <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>453</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>78</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0196-8904(96)00068-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shepard</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sapinelli</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Trace elements in feed manure and manured soils</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Qual</source>. <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>1846</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1856</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq2012.0133</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>A critical review of the bioavailability and impacts of heavy metals in municipal solid waste composts compared with sewage sludge</article-title>. <source>Environ. Int.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>142</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>156</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envint.2008.06.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18691760</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Q. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Greenway</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>A study of the elemental leachability and retention capability of compost</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Monit.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>31</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>37</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/b310840f</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14737468</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soumar&#x000E9;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tack</surname> <given-names>F. M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verloo</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Characterisation of Malian and Belgian solid waste composts with respect to fertility and suitability for land application</article-title>. <source>Waste Manag.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>517</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>22</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0956-053X(03)00067-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12909092</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Gestel</surname> <given-names>C. A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van der Waarde</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Derksen</surname> <given-names>J. G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van der Hoek</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veul</surname> <given-names>M. F. X. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bouwens</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>The use of acute and chronic bioassays to determine the ecological risk and bioremediation efficiency of oil-polluted soils</article-title>. <source>Environ. Toxicol. Chem</source>. <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>1438</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1449</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/etc.5620200705</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11434283</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walter</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x000ED;nez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cala</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Heavy metal speciation and phytotoxic effects of three representative sewage sludges for agricultural uses</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut</source>. <volume>139</volume>, <fpage>507</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2005.05.020</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16112313</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Woodworth</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tokach</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nelssen</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goodband</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x00027;Quinn</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fakler</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>The effects of added zinc from an organic zinc complex or inorganic sources on weanling pig growth performance</article-title>. <source>J. Animal Sci</source>. 77(Suppl 1):61.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zucconi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pera</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forte</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Bertoldi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Evaluating toxicity of immature compost</article-title>. <source>BioCycle</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>54</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>57</lpage>.</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure"><p><bold>Funding.</bold> This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MCIU), the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigaci&#x000F3;n (AEI) and the European Regional Development Funds (FEDER) through the project RTI2018-100819-B-I00.</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>