Front. Sustain. Food Syst. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2571-581X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00086 Sustainable Food Systems Correction Corrigendum: A Survey of Consumer Perceptions of Plant-Based and Clean Meat in the USA, India, and China Bryant Christopher 1 * Szejda Keri 2 Parekh Nishant 2 Deshpande Varun 2 Tse Brian 3 1Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom 2The Good Food Institute, Washington, DC, United States 3Center for Long Term Priorities, Hong Kong, China

Edited and reviewed by: Cor Van Der Weele, Wageningen University and Research, Netherlands

 *Correspondence: Christopher Bryant c.j.bryant@bath.ac.uk

This article was submitted to Climate-Smart Food Systems, a section of the journal Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

 23 06 2020 2020 4 86 30 01 2020 14 05 2020 Copyright © 2020 Bryant, Szejda, Parekh, Deshpande and Tse. 2020 Bryant, Szejda, Parekh, Deshpande and Tse

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on A Survey of Consumer Perceptions of Plant-Based and Clean Meat in the USA, India, and China by Bryant, C., Szejda, K., Parekh, N., Desphande, V., and Tse, B. (2019). Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3:11. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00011 clean meat cultured meat cell-based meat plant-based meat consumer acceptance consumer behavior

An author's name was incorrectly spelled as “Varun Desphande.” The correct spelling is “Varun Deshpande”.

In addition, the percentage of consumers in India who were willing to consume cultured meat was slightly under-reported. This was due to human error caused by reading numbers from the wrong column of a table.

A correction has been made to the Results section, subsection Descriptive Statistics, sub-subsection Acceptance, paragraph 1:

“We see a similar pattern with regards to purchase likelihood, which was also substantially higher in China and India compared to in the USA. In the USA, 23.6% were not at all likely to purchase clean meat; 46.6% were somewhat or moderately likely, and 29.8% were very or extremely likely. In China, 6.7% were not at all likely to purchase clean meat; 33.9% were somewhat or moderately likely, and 59.3% were very or extremely likely. In India, 10.7% were not at all likely to purchase clean meat; 32.9% were somewhat or moderately likely, and 56.3% were very or extremely likely.”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.