AUTHOR=Mishra Jyotsna , Bevers Kyle , Li Keguo , Zare Armaan , Heisner James S. , Tong Ailing , Kwok Wai-Meng , Stowe David F. , Camara Amadou K. S. 

TITLE=Differential Ca2+ handling by isolated synaptic and non-synaptic mitochondria: roles of Ca2+ buffering and efflux

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience

VOLUME=Volume 17 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/synaptic-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnsyn.2025.1562065

DOI=10.3389/fnsyn.2025.1562065

ISSN=1663-3563

ABSTRACT=Mitochondria regulate intracellular calcium ion (Ca2+) signaling by a fine-tuned process of mitochondrial matrix (m) Ca2+ influx, mCa2+ buffering (sequestration) and mCa2+ release (Ca2+ efflux). This process is critically important in the neurosynaptic terminal, where there is a simultaneous high demand for ATP utilization, cytosolic (c) Ca2+ regulation, and maintenance of ionic gradients across the cell membrane. Brain synaptic and non-synaptic mitochondria display marked differences in Ca2+ retention capacity. We hypothesized that mitochondrial Ca2+ handling in these two mitochondrial populations is determined by the net effects of Ca2+ uptake, buffering or efflux with increasing CaCl2 boluses. We found first that synaptic mitochondria have a more coupled respiration than non-synaptic mitochondria; this may correlate with the higher local energy demand in synapses to support neurotransmission. When both mitochondrial fractions were exposed to increasing mCa2+ loads we observed decreased mCa2+ sequestration in synaptic mitochondria as assessed by a significant increase in the steady-state free extra matrix Ca2+ (ss[Ca2+]e) compared to non-synaptic mitochondria. Since, non-synaptic mitochondria displayed a significantly reduced ss[Ca2+]e, this suggested a larger mCa2+ buffering capacity to maintain [Ca2+]m with increasing mCa2+ loads. There were no differences in the magnitude of the transient depolarizations and repolarizations of the membrane potential (ΔΨm) and both fractions exhibited similar gradual depolarization of the baseline ΔΨm during additional CaCl2 boluses. Adding the mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (mNCE) inhibitor CGP37157 to the mitochondrial suspensions unmasked the mCa2+ sequestration and concomitantly lowered ss[Ca2+]e in synaptic vs. non-synaptic mitochondria. Adding complex V inhibitor oligomycin plus ADP (OMN + ADP) bolstered the matrix Ca2+ buffering capacity in synaptic mitochondria, as did Cyclosporin A (CsA), in non-synaptic. Our results display distinct differences in regulation of the free [Ca2+]m to prevent collapse of ΔΨm during mCa2+ overload in the two populations of mitochondria. Synaptic mitochondria appear to rely mainly on mCa2+ efflux via mNCE, while non-synaptic mitochondria rely mainly on Pi-dependent mCa2+ sequestration. The functional implications of differential mCa2+ handling at neuronal synapses may be adaptations to cope with the higher metabolic activity and larger mCa2+ transients at synaptosomes, reflecting a distinct role they play in brain function.